Feedback Template - W91CRB-20-R-0010 Security Cooperation.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91CRB-20-R-0010
About this file
This draft solicitation is seeking industry feedback on solicitation number W91CRB-20-R-0010 for Army Security Cooperation Support services. At a minimum, the Army is requesting that interested and capable vendors provide answers to the following questions aimed at improving the draft solicitation: whether the requirements and evaluation approach are clear; if any clauses are missing or unclear; and if sufficient information is provided to submit a proposal. Feedback should be submitted using the provided template via email to john.a.harvey1.civ@mail.mil and alexander.s.obriwin.civ@mail.mil by January 22, 2020. This is a request for feedback only and not a formal request for proposals. The final solicitation will require vendors to submit a completed cost model in Microsoft Excel format. Other costs will be normalized for evaluation, with vendors proposing overhead rates according to approved disclosure statements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B08 DRAFT Solicitation_Consolidated Security Cooperation.pdf | ||
| A01 Security Cooperation CDRLs 2019.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
<Vendor Name> Feedback
| Vendor Name: |
| Submission Date: |
| Feedback Template for Draft Solicitation for Security Cooperation |
| W91CRB-20-R-0010 |
| ***Comments, recommendations, or feedback shall be referenced by: (1) number (2) Solicitation Document Title (3) Document Attachment Number ("JX") Section, Page(s) and Paragraph(s). If the comment, recommendation, or feedback is general, not specific to a section, state as such. Additional rows can be added to the table, as applicable. *** |
| Comment, Recommendation, or Feedback No. | Reference | Contractor’s Comments, Recommendations, or Feedback |
| 1 | General Question: Is the solicitation clear as to what is to be proposed and how it is to be evaluated? If not, specify what is unclear and how it may be corrected. | |
| 2 | General Question: Are there clauses that are missing, don't belong, or unclear? If so, specify. | |
| 3 | General Question: Is there sufficient information within the solicitation to properly submit a proposal? If not, specify where information is insufficient and how it may be corrected. | |
| 4 | General Question: Are there any other comments, questions, or clarifications needed? Be as specific as possible to help develop a better solicitation. | |
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 14 | ||
| 15 | ||
| 16 | ||
| 17 | ||
| 18 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 22 | ||
| 23 | ||
| 24 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 26 | ||
| 27 | ||
| 28 | ||
| 29 | ||
| 30 | ||
| 31 | ||
| 32 | ||
| 33 | ||
| 34 | ||
| 35 | ||
| 36 | ||
| 37 | ||
| 38 | ||
| 39 | ||
| 40 | ||
| 41 | ||
| 42 | ||
| 43 | ||
| 44 | ||
| 45 | ||
| 46 | ||
| 47 | ||
| 48 | ||
| 49 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .