Attachment 3 PPS for 08-Q-0112.doc

DOC document 134 KB Posted May 30, 2008

Attached to: JAF Mail Transport
Solicitation number: W91B4N-08-Q-0112
Issued by: Department of the Army

About this file

From the source

Attachment 3 PPS

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
08-Q-0112-0004.doc	DOC document	Aug 16, 2008
08-Q-0112-0002.pdf	PDF	Jun 16, 2008
Attachment 5 DD Form 254.pdf	PDF	Jun 10, 2008
08-Q-0112-0001.pdf	PDF	Jun 10, 2008
Attachment 4 DD Form 250.pdf	PDF	Jun 10, 2008
08-Q-0112 JAF Mail Transport.pdf	PDF	May 30, 2008
Attachment 1 SOW for 08-Q-0112.pdf	PDF	May 30, 2008
Attachment 2 QASP for 08-Q-0112.pdf	PDF	May 30, 2008

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

W91B4N-08-Q-0112

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

JAF Transport Services Bagram Regional Contracting Center Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan

GENERAL INFORMATION: (Completed by the Offeror) Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name:

Point of Contact:

Email Address:

Telephone Number:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Detailed Description of Work performed by the Offeror on this project:

Contract Number Provided by Offeror:

Dollar Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Note:

If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the:

FORMCHECKBOX

Prime Contractor

Sub-Contractor

Key Personnel B.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

Title:

Name of Company:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email::

RETURN COMLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

TSgt Robert Powell

E-mail Address:

robert.e.powell@afghan.swa.army.mil

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF U OR M.

Unsatisfactory

(U) Marginal

(M) Neutral

(N)

Satisfactory (S)

Very Good

(V) Exceptional

(E)

CONFIDENCE

LITTLE

CONFIDENCE

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SIGNIFICANT

CONFIDENCE

HIGH

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No performance record is identifiable.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Normal contractor emphasis should preclude any problems.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has significant confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has high confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

The CONTRACTOR:

Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

FORMCHECKBOX

Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

FORMCHECKBOX

Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

FORMCHECKBOX

Did contractor personnel conduct themselves in a professional manner during the contract performance?

FORMCHECKBOX

Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

FORMCHECKBOX

Identified problems as they occurred.

FORMCHECKBOX

10.

Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

FORMCHECKBOX

11.

Displayed initiative to solve problems.

FORMCHECKBOX

12.

Developed realistic progress schedules.

FORMCHECKBOX

13.

Met established project schedules.

FORMCHECKBOX

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

Unsatisfactory

(U) Marginal

(M) Neutral

(N) Satisfactory

(S) Very Good

(V) Exceptional

(E)

CONFIDENCE

LITTLE

CONFIDENCE

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SIGNIFICANT

CONFIDENCE

HIGH

CONFIDENCE

14.

Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

FORMCHECKBOX

15.

Was responsive to contract changes.

FORMCHECKBOX

16.

Provided adequate project supervision.

FORMCHECKBOX

19.

Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

FORMCHECKBOX

20.

Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

FORMCHECKBOX

21.

How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

FORMCHECKBOX

22.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in the space below this question:

FORMCHECKBOX

YES

FORMCHECKBOX

23.

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, explain in the space below this question:

FORMCHECKBOX

YES

FORMCHECKBOX

24.

Is the contractor rated in CPARS? (If unknown, leave blank)

FORMCHECKBOX

YES

FORMCHECKBOX

Add any additional remarks below:

27 May 08

Attachment #3

Page 2 of 3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.