Attachment C_Contractor Evaluation.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912WJ23R0002
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 - Attachment D (Updated).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 0001_Attachment E.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_D_Binding_Rates_Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sample_Task_Order.pdf | ||
| W912WJ23R0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_A_PPQ.pdf | ||
| Attachment_B_Joint_Venture_Requirements.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Final
| Technical Expertise | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Table 1 - NEPA Documents | Resources Affected by the Project | |||||||||||||||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) | Date of FONSI or ROD, or last NEPA document | For EISs, Number of Staff from the team listed in the published List of Preparers | Upland Forest, Grassland, Shrub | Estuary/Marine | Freshwater Wetland | Salt Marsh | Rivers/Streams | Eelgrass | Disciplines Provided by the Offeror's Team (from list provided) | Number of EIS Scoping Meetings Led by the Offeror's Team | Number of Public Meetings Led by the Team | For EISs, Number of Public Comments Received (>100, <100, <50) | Ecological Model Applied? (provide the name) | List any statistical analyses performed |
| Project 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Project 13 |
| Table 2 - Biological Assessments | |||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) | Federal Endangered Species Addressed |
| Project 1 | |||||||
| Project 2 | |||||||
| Project 3 | |||||||
| Project 4 | |||||||
| Project 5 |
| Table 3 - Essential Fish Habitat Assessments | ||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Project 1 | ||||||
| Project 2 | ||||||
| Project 3 |
| Table 4 - National Historic Preservation Act Surveys or Documents | |||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Type of Document (Eligibility Detemination, SAR, Phase 1, 2, or 3 Survey, Remoate Sesnin Surveeys, HABS/HAER) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Project 1 | |||||||
| Project 2 | |||||||
| Project 3 | |||||||
| Project 4 | |||||||
| Project 5 | |||||||
| Project 6 | |||||||
| Project 7 | |||||||
| Project 8 | |||||||
| Project 9 | |||||||
| Project 10 | |||||||
| Project 11 | |||||||
| Project 12 | |||||||
| Project 13 | |||||||
| Project 14 | |||||||
| Project 15 |
| Table 5 - Coastal Modeling Studies | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Project 1 | |||||
| Project 2 | |||||
| Project 3 | |||||
| Project 4 | |||||
| Project 5 |
| Table 6 - Ecological Risk Assessment | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. environmental remediation, flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Project 1 | |||||
| Project 2 | |||||
| Project 3 |
| Table 7 - Wetland Delineation | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. environmental remediation, flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Project 1 | |||||
| Project 2 | |||||
| Project 3 |
| Table 8 - Mitigation, Monitoring, and Adaptive Management Plan | |||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) | Primary Habitat(s) |
| Project 1 | |||||||
| Project 2 | |||||||
| Project 3 |
| Table 9 - Clean Air Act Emissions Studies | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Project 1 | |||||
| Project 2 | |||||
| Project 3 |
| Table 10. Personnel Qualifications | |||||||||||
| Staff Member Name | Anticipated Role in Supporting Work under the Contract | Discipline | Highest Degree | Office/Work Location | Years of Experience with the Prime Contractor | Years of Experience in the profession | Years of Experience working on Northeast Civil Works Water Resources Projects | Years of Experience working on USACE Civil Works Water Resources Projects | Years of Experience working on Military Construction and/or Environmental Master Plans | Number of EISs for which the Staff Member was the Lead Author | Number of EAs or cultural resources reports for which the Staff Member was the Lead Author |
| Acronyms | |
| AER | Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration |
| CSRM | Coastal Storm Risk Management |
| EA | Environmental Assessment |
| EIS | Environmental Impact Statement |
| FRM | Flood Risk Management |
| HABS | Historic American Buildings Survey |
| HAER | Historic American Engineering Record |
| NEPA | National Environmental Policy Act |
| ROD | Record of Decision |
Sheet1
| Technical Expertise | |
| Table 1 - NEPA Documents | Resources Affected by the Project |
tc={1E64DC3C-445C-4E45-B2B6-9A72652CA2CC}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Not trying to be difficult but I think we are slicing the bologna way to thin asking for this amount of detailed information that should otherwise be left to the contractor to provide when describing their NEPA experience. If all the offereors fill this out they are all going to look the same leaving little room to ifferentiate one contractors capabilites over another. Presenting this information in a matrix of thier own making speaks t thier abiltiy to present complex information in a clear and understandible format.
Project Name Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) Project Location (State) Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) tc={939B8AA7-EE83-430B-A4CE-9D1DCC91446B}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Should we have an acronym list?
Reply:
Good idea. Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) Date of FONSI or ROD, or last NEPA document For EISs, Number of Staff from the team listed in the published List of Preparers tc={F2285E40-6A47-4E7E-BD2B-3E6ED38BE1FD}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
| Prime or propsed team? It would seem valuable to know since the prime is responsible for the deliverable and is the POC even though the l;ions share of the work may done by the sub. | Upland Forest, Grassland, Shrub | Estuary/Marine | Freshwater Wetland | Salt Marsh | Rivers/Streams | Eelgrass | Disciplines Provided by the Offeror's Team (from list provided) | Number of EIS Scoping Meetings Led by the Offeror's Team | Number of Public Meetings Led by the Team | For EISs, Number of Public Comments Received (>100, <100, <50) | Ecological Model Applied? (provide the name) | List any statistical analyses performed |
| New Haven |
Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA): Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA):
Add example projects if it helps you.
tc={939B8AA7-EE83-430B-A4CE-9D1DCC91446B}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Should we have an acronym list?
Reply:
Good idea.
Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA): Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA):
Add things if you feel they are missing. Suggest deletions as appropriate.
| Navigation | CT | EIS | Yes | Yes | No | ||||||||||||||
| Providence River | Navigation | RI | EIS | Yes | Yes | No | 2001 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 12 | 3 | 6 | >100 | No |
| Town Pond | Ecosystem Restoration | RI | EA | Yes | Yes | No | 2000 | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 2 | NA | 3 | NA | HEP |
| Sagamore Marsh | Ecosystem Restoration | MA | EA | Yes | Yes | No | 2000 | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 2 | NA | 3 | NA | HEP |
| Table 2 - Biological Assessments | |||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) | Federal Endangered Species Addressed |
| Table 3 - Essential Fish Habitat Assessments | ||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Table 4 - National Historic Preservation Act Surveys or Documents | |||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Type of Document (Eligibility Detemination, SAR, Phase 1, 2, or 3 Survey, Remoate Sesnin Surveeys, HABS/HAER) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Table 5 - Coastal Modeling Studies | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Table 6 - Ecological Risk Assessment | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. environmental remediation, flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Table 7 - Wetland Delineation | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. environmental remediation, flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Table 8 - Mitigation, Monitoring, and Adaptive Management Plan | |||||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Type of NEPA Document (EIS or EA) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) | Primary Habitat(s) |
| Table 9 - Clean Air Act Emissions Studies | |||||
| Project Name | Primary Purpose (e.g. flood risk reduction, transportation, ecosystem restoration, navigation) | Project Location (State) | Was this a USACE Civil Works Project? | Was this a Water Resources Project (i.e. CSRM, FRM, AER, Navigation) | Was this a Military Project (e.g. military construction or master plan) |
| Personnel Qualifications |
| Staff Member Name |
tc={677EF741-7072-4386-8B9A-7DF0CF053EDC}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Identify thier affiliation Prime or Sub. and thier role in the contract. Just because they are on the list doesn;t mean the will be working on task orders.
tc={F2285E40-6A47-4E7E-BD2B-3E6ED38BE1FD}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
| Prime or propsed team? It would seem valuable to know since the prime is responsible for the deliverable and is the POC even though the l;ions share of the work may done by the sub. | Discipline | Highest Degree | Office/Work Location | Years of Experience with the Prime Contractor | Years of Experience in the profession | Years of Experience working on Northeast Civil Works Water Resources Projects | Years of Experience working on USACE Civil Works Water Resources Projects | Years of Experience working on Military Construction and/or Environmental Master Plans | Number of EISs for which the Staff Member was the Lead Author | Number of EAs for which the Staff Member was the Lead Author |
| Larry Oliver |
Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA): Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA):
Add yourself if it helps you.
tc={1E64DC3C-445C-4E45-B2B6-9A72652CA2CC}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Not trying to be difficult but I think we are slicing the bologna way to thin asking for this amount of detailed information that should otherwise be left to the contractor to provide when describing their NEPA experience. If all the offereors fill this out they are all going to look the same leaving little room to ifferentiate one contractors capabilites over another. Presenting this information in a matrix of thier own making speaks t thier abiltiy to present complex information in a clear and understandible format. Wetland Ecologist MS Concord, MA 35 37 37 35 1 4 15
Sheet2 Potential contract tasks Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA): Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA):
| What tasks are we most likely to award? | How would we evaluate capability | How would we evaluate capability | How would we evaluate capability | How would we evaluate capability |
| EIS | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| EA | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| BA | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| EFH assessment | Number (up to 10) | |||
| Feasibility study? | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Cultural resources assessment | Number (up to 10) | |||
| Ecological risk assessment | Number (up to 10) | |||
| Public meeting facilitation and logistics | Number (up to 10) | |||
| EIS Public comment responses | Number (up to 10) | |||
| Wetland delineation | Number (up to 10) | |||
| Field survey - e.g. bat, bird, benthic, fish | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Ecological benefits modeling | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Coastal hydraulic modeling | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Mitigation plan design and implementation | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Monitoring plan design and implementation | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Clean Air Act assessment | Number (up to 10) and relevance | |||
| Report preparation | measured by the overall quality of the proposal | |||
| Critical Line Items for a Cost Comparison |
Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA): Oliver, Lawrence R CIV USARMY CENAE (USA):
What are the primary disciplines we would use most frequently?
| Project manager |
| Wetland ecologist |
| Marine/estuarine ecologist |
| Wildlife biologist |
| Fish biologist |
| GIS specialist |
| Coastal engineer |
| Graphics specialist |
| Facilitator |
| Field technician |
| Indicate the number of (X) prepared over the last ten years and provide information on the 10 most relevant in the matrix |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .