A.3.6.1_JA_Kunsan_HAS_signed.pdf

PDF 839 KB Posted

Attached to
AE Re-design, 3rd HAS, Kunsan AB Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912UM19RAE08
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Far East

About this file

JA for Kunsan HAS

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

“For Official Use Only” See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Control No: JA19-0004

Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition

Architectural Engineering Services for CY ROKFC In-Kind, HAS Phase 1, 2 and 3 Kunsan

Airbase Korea

AMKOR A&E Inc

1. Contracting Activity: Contracting Division, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Far East District (FED).

2. Description of Action: Approval is requested for non-competitive Architect Engineer

Services purchase order.

3. Description of Services: The AE’s services include fire protection engineering, electrical engineering and other services and tasks including BIM, interior design, energy modeling, landscape design, LEED support and rendering. The AE’s services supplements, and is coordinated to, that of the Far East District’s in-house design team which is performing the work of all other design disciplines.

The Architect-Engineer (A-E) shall perform all work necessary for the design and preparation of documents for the construction of those items identified in the project description. The work in general consists of field investigations, conducting all required studies/reports, attending meetings/conferences, for BIM support, preparation of Landscape Design, Architectural Renderings, Comprehensive Interior Design (CID), LEED Documentation online, LEED Design Notebook, Energy Modeling, and related pre-final, back check, and contract documents, and other A-E services described hereunder. The estimated price for the work is $30,000

4. Authority Cited: 10 United States Code 2304(c)(1) as implemented in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1(a)(2)(iii), Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements, it is likely that award to any other source would result in substantial duplication of cost to the Government that would not be recovered through competition and would result in unacceptable delays in fulfilling the Government’s requirements.

5. Reason for Authority Cited:

a. Use of competitive (i.e., Brooks Act – FAR 36.6) procedures for the desired AE design services for this modification will not result in any cost savings to the Government, and will likely cost it more in terms of money and time.

b. Task order W912UM-13-D-0003-0030 was awarded 30 July 2015 to AMKOR A&E INC for the design of Calendar Year (CY) 2015 Republic of Korea Funded Construction (ROKFC) In-Kind Combine Design Packages for Hardened Aircraft Shelters Phase 1, 2, and 3 at Kunsan Airbase, Korea. The construction of this design has begun, however, due to political protests that occurred during construction on 1 April 2019 from locals concerning the location of the currently designed drainage line "N". Current drainage system connects to off-base irrigation of local farmland. Construction of overflow drainage ceased immediately following the protest by direction of ROK Government officials. Immediate re-design is required in order to maintain project progress towards its scheduled completion of May 2020. Failure to perform the re-design will result in delay of project completion, resulting in additional costs to the Government for contractor's overhead, as well as impact to the using agency's occupancy plan for these 20 new aircraft shelters.

c. Because AMKOR A&E has already performed the majority of the services related to the design, using that architect engineer contractor’s services for the design of this project will avoid duplication in cost, amounting to an estimated $57,994 which was the total of the previous design. If we were to compete this requirement to a different firm, the Government would require the incoming A-E firm to assume responsibility for the entire design due to the additional requirement of contractor sequencing.

d. Selection of another AE for this modification would increase FED’s costs of obtaining the desired design services, since other AE firms would need to perform greater effort to evaluate and validate the existing AMKOR design and prepare their input towards the design of this modification. Moreover, selecting another AE would result in a scenario with 2 different designers of record for inter-related projects. Using competitive selection procedures would be unacceptable because such a selection would take an estimated 4 months just to advertise, negotiate and award. By comparison, negotiation and execution of the work under the projected purchase order is expected to take 1.5 months, which results in an estimated savings in 2.5 months in construction.

e. The estimated cost for these new tasks, plus validation of the original design and for another A-E to take full responsibility for the entire design would be $78,000. Therefore the comparison is $30,000 (current AE) to $75,270 (new AE) means $48,000 savings.

6. Efforts to Obtain Competition:

a. Effective competition is not anticipated for this acquisition. For the reasons stated in Paragraph 5 above it would be impractical to solicit work from A-E’s other than AMKOR.

b. Subcontracting competition. FED will advise AMKOR to place any work it needs to subcontract in accordance with the competitive procedures of the Brooks Ace and FAR 36.6

7. Actions to Increase Competition: In the future, FED will endeavor to use competitive (i.e., Brooks Act – FAR 36.6) selection procedures, in accordance with Engineer Pamphlet 715-1-7, whenever placing requirements against its IDIQ A-E services contracts or making public announcements for A-E services. FED will try to avoid situations in which designs for virtually identical projects are undertaken simultaneously or near simultaneously, by its in-house design forces and its A-E contractors.

8. Market Research: FED conducted market research by reviewing existing acquisitions among its existing IDIQ A-E services contractors to determine which contractor would best be able to provide the design services needed by the FED Engineering Division, Design Branch. FED’s market research concluded that AMKOR was the best qualified A-E contractor to provide the required services, given that it had recently produced a virtually identical design to the one being prepared by the FED Engineering Division, Design Branch for the project.

9. Interested Sources: To date, no other sources have written to express an interest. The notices required by FAR 5.201 were published on 17 June 2019, no proposals received.

10. Other Facts:

a. Procurement History

(1) W912UM-13-D-0003-0030 awarded on 15 July 2015. 100% design delivered on 31

August 2015.

(2) These contracts were awarded using procedures set out under the Brooks Act, Title 40 U.S.C Chapter 11, and FAR Subpart 36.6.

(3) Not applicable. This is the first time this specific requirement has been solicited.

(4) Not applicable. This is the first time this specific requirement has been solicited.

(5) No unusual patterns have been revealed by the history of this acquisition.

(6) Not applicable. This is the first time this specific requirement has been solicited.

b. Other Facts: None

11. Technical Certification:

I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Typed Name: Won Lee Date: __________________________

Title: Design Manager Signature: ______________________

12. Requirements Certification:

I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Typed Name: Daniel Novotny Date: __________________________

Title: Project Manager Signature: ______________________ j1edkwsl Typewritten Text 17 June 2019 j1ppfdn9 Text Box 17 June 2019

13. Fair and Reasonable Cost Determination:

I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government for this contract action will be fair and reasonable.

I hereby determine that the negotiated price to the Government for this modification is fair and reasonable based on the prices for the contract previously awarded for similar projects in the past involving the contractor, AMKOR. No certified cost or pricing data will be required since the cost of this requirement is estimated to be below the $2,000,000 threshold.

Typed Name: Brady L. Hales Date: __________________________

Title: Contracting Officer Signature: ______________________

14. Contracting Officer Certification:

I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Typed Name: Brady L. Hales Date: __________________________

Title: Contracting Officer Signature: ______________________

Approval

Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve an other than full and open competition basis pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2304(c) and FAR 6.302-1(a) (2)(iii), subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and property herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

Date: ___________________ Signature: ___________________

Date Posted:

June 16, 2019

Posting Confirmation

Solicitation #:

W912UM19RAE08

Procurement Type:

Special Notice

Title:

Notice of Intent To Sole Source, AE Design for ROKFC In-Kind, Hardened Aircraft Shelter, Phase 1, 2 and 3 Kunsan Airbase Korea

Page 1 of 1Posting Confirmation - Federal Business Opportunities: Notices

6/17/2019https://www.fbo.gov/index.php?_paction=post&print_preview=1

A-E:

Project Number & Name:

Location:

Contract / Task Order Number: W912UM-19-D-0001 TBD

Scope of AE services:

Estimated Construction Cost (ECC): $500,000 SOW date:

I. COST ESTIMATE

A. LABOR (Direct Labor + Indirect/Overhead, Prime + Subs) Design Non-Design Total (D+ND)

PROJECT MANAGEMENT and MISC. TASKS N/A $8,965.12 $8,965.12

CIVIL $25,990 $22,014 $48,004

ARCHITECTURAL $0 $0 $0

STRUCTURAL $0 $0 $0

FIRE PROTECTION $0 $0 $0

MECHANICAL $0 $0 $0

ELECTRICAL $0 $0 $0

COMMUNICATIONS $0 $0 $0

COST ESTIMATING $863 $6,154 $7,017

$26,853 $37,133 $63,986

B. TRAVEL

(Airfare, Per Diem, Car Rental, Mileage, Tolls, Parking) N/A $5,952 $5,952

C. OTHER DIRECT COSTS

(Reproduction, Materials, Supplies, Soil Borings, Lab Tests) N/A $779 $779

$26,853 $43,864 $70,718

PROFIT 10.00% $2,685 $4,386 $7,072

DBA Insurance LS $0 $0 $0

$29,539 $48,251 $77,789

$29,539 / $500,000 = 5.91%

$77,789 / $500,000 = 15.56%

II. STATUTORY LIMITATION: Total Design Fee / ECC =

III. ADMINISTRATIVE LIMITATION: Total Fee / ECC =

HDR

CY15 ROKFC In-Kind, F16R610, F17R611 and F17R612 Construct 3RD Gen

Kunsan Air Base, Korea

Reroute connection of an overflow drainage line which is intended as an overflow for extreme rains over 8"/hour for the 3rd Generation Hardened Aircraft Shelter (HAS) Phase 1-3 project to an off-base open irrigation ditch.

SUBTOTAL, LABOR

TOTAL PRICE (Costs + Profit)

SUBTOTAL, ALL COSTS A+B+C (without Profit)

A-E PROPOSAL

TAB 1: SUMMARY

10-Jun-19

1-Summary

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Source Selection Information - FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Page 1 of 1

6/7/2019

Design Non-Design Total (D+ND) n/a $2,913 $2,913

$12,612 $5,032 $17,645

$0 $0 $0

$939 $3,521 $4,460

$13,551 $11,466 $25,018 n/a $1,500 $1,500 n/a $451 $451

$13,551 $13,417 $26,968

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$13,551 $13,417 $26,968

10.00% $1,355 $1,342 $2,697

$14,907 $14,759 $29,665

$29,665

= / $500,000 = 2.98%

= / $500,000 = 5.93%

DATEIV. COORDINATION AND APPROVAL

Prepared by:

Design Manager

EDT-D

CEPOF-ED

Kwang Kyu Choe

Pamela J. LovaszApproved by:

Chief, Engineering Division

Endorsed by:

Chief, Design Management Section

Won K. Lee

EDT-D

The IGE preparer(s) and IGE approving reviewer(s) certify the IGE was developed independently and prior to receiving a formal proposal from the contractor.

INDEPENDENT GOVERNMENT ESTIMATE

II. STATUTORY LIMITATION

IGE TOTAL:

AMKOR

CY15 ROKFC In-Kind, F16R610, F17R611 and F17R612 Construct 3RD Generation Hardened Aircraft

Shelters, PH 1, PH 2 and PH 3

Reroute connection of an overflow drainage line which is intended as an overflow for extreme rains over

8"/hour for the 3rd Generation Hardened Aircraft Shelter (HAS) Phase 1-3 project to an off-base open irrigation ditch.

SUMMARY

$14,907

PROJECT MANAGEMENT and MISC. TASKS

Total Design Fee / ECC

SIGNATURE

$29,665

III. ADMINISTRATIVE LIMITATION

Total Estimated Fee / ECC

(Consultant 1)

COMMUNICATIONS

COST ESTIMATING

Reproduction

Additional consultants (without profit)

A-E costs (without profit)

PROFIT

A-E + consultants (with profit)

Professional Services (subtotal)

A-E + consultants (without profit)

(Consultant 2)

ARCHITECTURAL

Professional Services (without profit)

CIVIL

SOW date:

I. FEE ESTIMATE

STRUCTURAL

FIRE PROTECTION

MECHANICAL

ELECTRICAL

Travel

$500,000Estimated Construction Cost (ECC):

Scope of AE services:

Contract, Task Order Number:

IGE Summ

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Source Selection Information - FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Page 1 of 12

No. Sheets n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

1 2.0 4.0 6.0 6.0

0.0 0.0

1 2.0 8.0 10.0 10.0

2 4.0 8.0 12.0 24.0

4 2.0 8.0 10.0 40.0

4 2.0 8.0 10.0 40.0

2 2.0 8.0 10.0 20.0

14 ◄ SHEETS 32.0 108.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CIVIL 140.0

4.0 8.0 12.0 0.0

2.0 4.0 8.0 14.0 0.0

4.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 0.0

2.0 8.0 8.0 18.0 0.0

0 ◄ SHEETS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ARCH. 0.0

0 ◄ SHEETS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 STRUCT. 0.0

4.0 4.0 8.0 0.0

4.0 4.0 8.0 16.0 0.0

0 ◄ SHEETS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FPE 0.0

EFFORT (per sheet)

TOTAL HOURS

(Labor

Category)

PER SHEET

TOTAL

Fire Alarm Riser Plan Schematic Diagrams

Details

Sequence of Operaioans

Fire Pump

DRAWINGS

Sheet Title

Cover / Index / Notes / Abbreviations

Fire Sprinkler Floor Plans

Fire Alarm Floor Plans

Foundation Plan(s)

Enlarged Ground Plans

Cross Sections

STRUCTURAL

Struct - Sr.

Struct -

Mid

FIRE PROTECTION

Schedules

Conection Details

Misc Details

FPE - Sr. FPE - Mid FPE - Jr. Drafter

Struct - Jr. Blast - Sr. Drafter

TOTALDRAWINGS

Interior Finish Schedule

Interior Elevations / Details

Door/Window Schedules/Details

Window and Louver Details

Signage plan/Details

Ceiling Details

Exterior Elevations

Building Sections

Enlarged Floor Plans

Wall Sections

Demo Plan(s)

Floor Plan(s)

Roof Plans

Reflected Ceiling Plan(s)

TOTALDRAWINGS

Errosion Control Plans

Pavement Plans/Details

Chain Link Fence

ARCHITECTURAL

Arch - Sr. Arch - Mid Arch - Jr. Drafter IntDes - Sr IntDes - Jr

Site Plan(s)

Grading and Drainage Plan(s)

Utilities Plan(s)

Sections/Profiles

Details(Water, Sewer, Drainage)

DRAWINGS

Cover/Location / Index / Notes / Abbrevs.

Boring Logs Plan and Location

Demolition Plan(s)

CIVIL

DRAWINGS - WORKSHEET

Complete/modify the drawing lists below, as needed to prepare the IGE.

Civil - Sr. Civil - Mid. Civil - Jr. Drafter Landscap e Arch.

IGE Drawings FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 2 of 12

Task Order Number:

Scope:

Estimated Construction Cost (ECC):

Design Manager (Prepare) Org:

Government Negotiator (Review): Org:

Reroute connection of an overflow drainage line which is intended as an overflow for extreme rains over 8"/hour for the 3rd Generation

Hardened Aircraft Shelter (HAS) Phase 1-3 project to an off-base open irrigation ditch.

Won K. Lee EDT-D

$500,000

CY15 ROKFC In-Kind, F16R610, F17R611 and F17R612 Construct 3RD Generation Hardened Aircraft Shelters, PH 1, PH 2 and PH 3

SOW Date: 6/7/2019

2. PROFIT: The profit factor estimate is based on UAI, Part 15, paragraph 215.404-73-102. Range

Lowest complexity 5.00%

Less than Average complexity 6.50%

1. TECHNICAL COMPLEXITY Average complexity 7.50% 7.50%

Higher than Average complexity 8.50%

Highest complexity 10.00%

1 month to complete design/service 2.00%

6 months to complete design/service 2.50% 2.50%

2. LENGTH 11 months to complete design/service 3.00%

16 months to complete design/service 3.50%

21 months to complete design/service 4.00%

No subcontracting

1-25% subcontracting 0.50%

26-50% subcontracting 1.00%

51-75% subcontracting 1.50%

>75% subcontracting 2.00%

TOTAL PROFIT PERCENTAGE

Percentage

a. The work to be performed is described in:

1. GENERAL:

N/A (OCONUS)

10.00%

3. SUBCONTRACTING IN SUPPORT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC

PROGRAMS

Scope of Work dated: 7-Jun-19

b. The estimated design fee is developed by the detailed analysis method in accordance with FAR 36.605(A) & (B) and UAI 36.605-100.

BASIS OF ESTIMATE

IGE breakdown FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 6 of 12

Reroute connection of an overflow drainage line which is intended as an overflow for extreme rains over 8"/hour for the 3rd Generation

CY15 ROKFC In-Kind, F16R610, F17R611 and F17R612 Construct 3RD Generation Hardened Aircraft Shelters, PH 1, PH 2 and PH 3

Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category

PM QCM Arch - Sr. LEED BIM Translation (ID #) (ID #) (ID #) (ID #)

$121.36 $134.47 $117.69 $100.88 $109.27 $96.65

NON-DESIGN (PERSON-HOURS)

Field Investigation / Research 4

Kick Off meeting 4

Review Comments (management of) 4

QC/ITR (management of) 4

Coordination (FED, customer, etc) 8

Coordinating (AE's internal)

Deliverable prep (__submissions)

BIM Management

Rendering(s)

LEED Management

Value Engineering

Translations

NON-DESIGN HOURS (Subtotals) 24 24

NON-DESIGN COST $2,912.64 $2,913

Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category

Civil - Sr. Civil - Mid. Civil - Jr. BIM LEED Specs - Sr Specs - Jr (ID #) (ID #) (ID #)

$100.88 $56.38 $42.89 $109.27 $100.88 $109.27 $100.88

DESIGN (PERSON-HOURS)

Drawings 32 108

Specifications 8 8

Design Analysis 16

Cost Estimating coord / QTO's

DESIGN HOURS (Subtotals) 56 108 8 172

DESIGN COST $5,649.28 $6,089.04 $874.16 $12,612

Field Investigation / Research 8 8

Kick Off meeting 8 8

Review Comments 8 8

QC/ITR 8 8

Project Meetings

LEED/BIM

Coordinations

NON-DESIGN HOURS (Subtotals) 32 32 64

NON-DESIGN COST $3,228.16 $1,804.16 $5,032.32

CIVIL: TOTAL COSTS (D + ND) $8,877.44 $7,893.20 $874.16 $17,644.80

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

and MISC. TASKS

CIVIL TOTAL

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

IGE breakdown FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 7 of 12

Reroute connection of an overflow drainage line which is intended as an overflow for extreme rains over 8"/hour for the 3rd Generation

CY15 ROKFC In-Kind, F16R610, F17R611 and F17R612 Construct 3RD Generation Hardened Aircraft Shelters, PH 1, PH 2 and PH 3

Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category Labor Category

Cost - Sr. Cost - Mid Cost - Jr. PM (ID #) (ID #) (ID #) (ID #) (ID #) (ID #)

$69.73 $47.64 $121.36

DESIGN (PERSON-HOURS)

Cost Estimate - US format 8 8

DESIGN HOURS (Subtotals) 8 8 16

DESIGN COST $557.84 $381.12 $939

DD 1354 2 2

Cost Estimate - MND/Korea format 20 20

Project Meetings 8 8

NON-DESIGN HOURS (subtotals) 30 30 $60

NON-DESIGN COST $2,091.90 $1,429.20 $3,521

COMMS: TOTAL COSTS (D + ND) $2,649.74 $1,810.32 $4,460

$188

$148

$336

$13,551

$11,466

$25,018

Trip activity

Travel

Cost / person

Per Diem # Days # People # of trips Subtotal

Kick Off meeting $120.00 $150.00 2 3 1 $1,260

OBR $120.00 1 2 1 $240

$1,500

TRAVEL

TOTAL, Travel

NON-DESIGN ( HOURS)

TOTAL (HOURS)

DESIGN COST

NON-DESIGN COST

Total Cost (D + ND)

COST ESTIMATING TOTAL

LABOR

(ALL

DISCIPLINE

S)

DESIGN (HOURS)

IGE breakdown FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 11 of 12

Reroute connection of an overflow drainage line which is intended as an overflow for extreme rains over 8"/hour for the 3rd Generation

CY15 ROKFC In-Kind, F16R610, F17R611 and F17R612 Construct 3RD Generation Hardened Aircraft Shelters, PH 1, PH 2 and PH 3

ITEM SHEETS # of SETS Total Unit Price Full Size - B&W $1.42 Half-size- B&W 14 20 280 $0.71

8.5x11 (A4) B&W 200 20 4000 $0.05

11x17 (A3) B&W $0.10

CD ROM 2530 50 50 $1.04

$451

(Consultant 1) Rate Hours Cost

(Activity/labor category)

Design (Totals):

Travel (total):

Non-Design (Totals):

Consultant 1 (Total proposal):

(Consultant 2) Rate Hours Cost

Design (Totals):

Travel (total):

Non-Design (Totals):

Consultant 2 (Total proposal):

TOTAL, Reproduction

$52.17

REPRODUCTION

COST

$198.80

$200.00

END.

DESIGN

NON-DESIGN

CONSULTANT SERVICES

DESIGN

NON-DESIGN

IGE breakdown FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 12 of 12

2019-06-17T12:18:05+0900
LEE.WON.KYUNG.1094971736
2019-06-17T13:12:02+0900
NOVOTNY.DANIEL.CHRISTOPHER.1379520843
2019-06-17T14:06:26+0900
HALES.BRADY.L.1382862500
2019-06-17T14:06:48+0900
HALES.BRADY.L.1382862500
2019-06-17T14:20:21+0900
HALES.BRADY.L.1382862500

File details come from the government source that posted it.