Attachment_1_-_SOW_Laboratory_Analysis_Services_20190808.pdf

BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA)

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) FOR

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICES FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN KOREA

8 Aug 2019

1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK REQUIRED UNDER THIS SOW

Furnish all lab or, tools, equipment, and materials to provide Environmental Laboratory Testing Services to obtain technically valid and legally defensible environmental analytical data if and when requested by the Government. All work to be done in accordance with the attached terms and provisions. It is understood that no one lab will always be capable of performing all requested analyses. Labs may subcontract analyses; however, labs must meet quality and all applicable certification requirements in this SOW.

2.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Far East District (FED) needs to conduct chemical analysis tests of materials associated with various activities and that it does not possess the in-house capability of conducting the field sampling and chemical analysis of industrial wastes and waters, soils, sediments, sludge, ground waters, surface waters, oils, paint chips, and other environmental samples. The Contractor in support of FED programs shall perform field sampling support and analytical services.

2.1 LABORATORY CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS

The objective of this contract is to obtain technically valid and legally defensible environmental data that will meet or exceed the required site-specific Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). This contract describes the management policies, objectives, principles, and procedures, which will be used to generate data of the required quality.

This contract also defines the quality assurance program for oversight of the Contractor activities and for the evaluation of the analytical data generated by the Contractor. All work performed under this contract shall meet the applicable portions of the Department of Defense Quality System Manual (DoD QSM) for Environmental Laboratories, EM 200-1-3, ISO/IEC 17025, specific SW-846 methods in this SOW, and any revisions to that document. The laboratory shall maintain active and the current National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) accreditation. Additionally the laboratory shall maintain active and the current ROK Water Quality Measurement Agency (수질측정대행업).

2.2 PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS

Laboratory management shall provide competent personnel who are able to operate specific equipment, perform environmental tests, evaluate lab results, and sign lab reports.

When using staff who are undergoing training, appropriate supervision shall be provided.

Personnel performing specific tasks shall be qualified on the basis of appropriate education, training, experience and/or demonstrated skills as determined by laboratory management. All personnel shall be responsible for complying with all quality assurance/quality control requirements that pertain to their organization/technical function. The Contractor is allowed to perform dual function in organization. The Contractor shall provide to the FED with the resumes for all of its personnel that will be associated with this contract. Summary of changes in personnel in the Contractor shall be provided to the FED as they occur. Resumes of new personnel and their responsibilities shall be provided as they are added to the staff of the Contractor.

2.2.1 PROJECT MANAGER

Project Manager (PM) is responsible for preparing the requirements for the project, maintaining the lab schedule, ensuring that technical requirements are met by the laboratory, and advising internal personnel and customers of variances. The PM will also be responsible for posting invoices on a secure internet location. The PM will provide technical guidance and necessary laboratory related information to the lab personnel and to the client, and provide peer review of the final document to ensure accuracy of the information and data.

2.2.2 SAMPLING PERSONNEL

The Contractor shall have experienced sampling technicians available with one week notice to support in the collection of samples during field events. Personnel shall have a field sample collection experience in soil, sediment, surface water, ground water and waste samples. Sampling personnel shall meet the training requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazardous Waste and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) and provide training certifications. The use of respiratory protection may be required during some sampling efforts. Trained sampling personnel will be required to sample in accordance with a project specific Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP), and Corps of Engineers health and safety requirements including OSHA requirements (29 CFR 1910 and 1926) and the USACE’s Safety and Health Requirements Manual (EM 385-1-1). The sampling personnel shall be aware of the potential hazards associated with the handling of chemicals and contaminated samples. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to take all necessary measures to ensure the health and safety of its employees and to prevent releases of hazardous materials to the environment.

Asbestos sampling personnel shall have US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) equivalent Asbestos Building Inspector certificate.

3.0 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS

USEPA approved sampling methods following the Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (USEPA 2007) and Korean Standard Test Method, will be used to provide definitive- level quantitative analytical data that will meet the applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements. Whenever these methods are used, the requirements and procedures of chapter 1-4 of SW-846 shall also be followed as applicable to performance of laboratory work. Many aspects of procedures specified by SW-846 are ambiguous or offer alternatives for choices of action. The content of any USACE approved project work plan, sampling and analysis plan, and/or quality assurance project plan, will provide clarification as to the specific options for execution of laboratory analyses that will be acceptable to USACE. If there is a conflict between the content of any project work plan, sampling and analysis plan, and/or quality assurance project plan, and the minimum requirements of SW-846, then the content of any project work plan, sampling and analysis plan, and/or quality assurance project plan will take precedence for execution of work for this contract. In the absence of project specific documents, the analytical requirements of the most currently published version of the DOD QSM apply.

3.1 REQUESTED ANALYSES

Requested test items based on the USFK Regulation 201-1. Test items and method for each matrix are provided in Table 1.

3.2 GENERAL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS

To ensure that quality data are continuously produced during analysis and allow the eventual compliance review, systematic QC checks are incorporated into the analyses.

Systematic QC checks include replicates, standards, surrogates, or spiked samples and are incorporated into the analyses to show results remain reproducible and that the analytical method is actually measuring the quantity of target analytes without unacceptable bias.

3.3 TARGET COMPOUND LISTS

Target analyte lists necessary for a project should be identified within project contract documents based upon project-specific data quality objectives. However, for instances where a particular SW-846 method is specified but the target analyte list for the method is not, the requirements presented in the DOD QSM version 5.0 or

5.1 shall be applied.

3.4 METHOD PERFORMANCE

For each method performed, the lab shall maintain documentation that demonstrates the lab's performance of the method within sensitivity and precision/bias as stated in the published method to include a detection limit (DL) study for each matrix, determine an appropriate limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) for each compound and matrix based upon the calculated DL, demonstrate precision and bias of the method by analyzing laboratory control samples and other QC check samples; and the laboratory shall have, in-house, the appropriate standards for all target analytes.

3.5 ANALYTICAL PROCESS DOCUMENTATION

The lab must maintain documentation to clearly show how all of the analytical values were obtained to include but not limited to logbooks, chain-of-custody records, sample work sheets, bench sheets, instrument printout, and other documents relating to the sample or sample analysis.

3.6 LABORATORY SAMPLE HANDLING REQUIREMENTS

3.6.1 SAMPLE HANDLING AND DELIVERY

The Contractor shall furnish all the applicable sample containers and coolers necessary for the collection and shipment of field samples. The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) will be responsible for making arrangements for delivery of samples to the Contractor. Prior to such delivery, the COR will notify Contractor by e-mail or phone, the expected delivery of samples to the laboratory. The contractor shall also provide the delivery of samples from FED to the contractor’s laboratory facility when requested. Arrival of samples to contractor’s laboratory facility must occur within 24 hours from the time contractor is notified that the samples are ready for delivery. When the samples are delivered to SubContractor by Contractor, all soil and groundwater samples shall be received by the analyzing Laboratory at 2 – 6 ºC. Be aware that soil or groundwater samples received by the SubContractor at temperatures higher than 6 ºC shall be declared invalid and will require resampling at no additional cost to the Government. If insufficient time is available between sample shipping from the Contractor and receipt by the SubContractor, then additional ice must be used to reduce temperatures to the desired range.

3.6.2 SAMPLE RECEIPT

The receiving laboratory’s chain-of-custody, sample storage, and distribution for analysis shall be documented per specific laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs) and project requirements. Individual ' Cooler Receipt Forms ' or similar, shall be used by the laboratory for each cooler to verify sample condition, including proper sample containers, volumes, preservation, etc. and document any problems noted.

Corrective action will be required for any deficiencies identified. It is required that all coolers contain at least one temperature blank. The temperature blank should be a 40-ml VOA vial filled with water and placed in a representative position inside the cooler.

The laboratory should document when the temperature blank was positioned inappropriately or was not representative of the cooler temperature measurement on the Cooler Receipt Form. The chain-of-custody form, any shipping documents, completed cooler receipt forms, telephone conversation record forms, and any corrective action forms will be maintained by the laboratory for each shipment and included in the reporting package when the results are submitted.

3.6.3 SAMPLE STORAGE

All samples and their associated extracts must be stored under conditions that will preserve their integrity and preservation and demonstrated to be free from all potential contaminants. The Contractor maintain in appropriate condition for all samples and their associated extracts for a minimum of sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the final data report at FED for those samples. After that time, the Contractor is responsible for the disposal of the samples and extracts in compliance with all Korean National, Provincial, and local regulations (if the Contractor is located in Korea) or all Federal, State, and local regulations (if the Contractor is located in the U.S.) at the Contractor's expense.

3.6.4 RETURN OF SHIPPING MATERIALS BY CONTRACTOR

Contractor shall make arrangements to return any Government furnished coolers and other usable materials (trays, blue ice packs, etc.) to FED within 30 calendar days after receipt of samples

3.6.5 SAMPLE SECURITY AND TRACKING

The laboratory shall maintain the integrity of the samples received, their associated extracts, and the data generated. Limited and controlled access to all laboratory areas shall be maintained. If required by the project, the laboratory should maintain sample and extract chain-of-custody within the laboratory at all times through the use of appropriate documentation and forms, otherwise strict internal chain-of-custody would not be required.

3.6.6 SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES

Holding times are defined from the date the sample is collected in the field to the date the sample is prepared (or extracted) or analyzed by the Contractor. All samples shall be handled in such a manner that all sample extraction and analysis holding times are met.

Sufficient time shall also be allowed for the reanalysis of samples within holding times should calibration, method, or quality control failures occur. These holding times are summarized in Appendix B, EM-200-1-3. The various projects requiring analytical support via this contract award are very critical in supporting the District’s mission.

Because of these projects are non-routine monitoring and there is no chance of re-sampling, it is important that analyses be done correctly with acceptable quality within the required holding time. Once the contractor takes custody of the samples the contractor is solely responsible for the sample handling, storage, and other transportation of the samples to their other subcontractor’s laboratory.

4.0 DATA VALIDATION AND REPORTING

4.1 DATA VALIDATION

Internal data validation process shall consist of data generation, reduction, and a minimum three levels of documented review. In each stage, the review process shall be documented using an appropriate checklist form that is signed and dated by the reviewer. The analyst who generates the analytical data has the prime responsibility for the correctness and completeness of the data.

Each step of this review process involves evaluation of data quality based on both the results of the QC data and the professional judgment of those conducting the review. All data generated and reduced shall follow well-documented in-house protocols.

4.1.1 LEVEL 1 TECHNICAL DATA REVIEW

Each analyst at the Contractor reviews the quality of their work based on an established set of guidelines. The review criteria as established in each method, in this contract, or within the Contractor shall be used. This review shall, at a minimum, ensure that: (1) Sample preparation information is correct and complete; (2) Analysis information is correct and complete; (3) The appropriate SOPs have been followed; (4) Analytical results are correct and complete; (5) QC samples are within established control limits; (6) Blanks and laboratory control samples are within appropriate QC limits; (7) Special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met; and (8) Documentation is complete (e.g., all anomalies in the preparation and analysis have been documented, anomaly forms are complete, holding times are documented, etc.). Level 1 data review shall be documented by using a checklist form and by the signature and date of the reviewer.

4.1.2 LEVEL 2 SUPERVISORY DATA REVIEW.

Level 2 review shall be performed by a supervisor or data review specialist at the Contractor whose function is to provide an independent review of the data package. This review shall also be conducted according to an established set of guidelines and is structured to ensure that: (1) All appropriate laboratory SOPs have been followed; (2) Calibration data are scientifically sound, appropriate to the method, and completely documented; (3) QC samples are within established guidelines; (4) Qualitative identification of sample components is correct; (5) Quantitative results are correct; (6) Documentation is complete and correct (e.g., anomalies in the preparation and analysis have been documented, anomaly forms are complete, holding times are documented, etc.); (7) The data are ready for incorporation into the final report; and (8) The data package is complete and ready for data archive. Level 2 review shall be structured so that all calibration data and QC sample results are reviewed and all of the analytical results from at least 10% of the samples are checked back to the bench sheet. If no problems are found with the data package, the review is complete. If any problems are found with the data package, an additional 10% of the sample results shall be checked back to the bench sheet. This cycle then repeats until either no errors are found in the data set checked or all data has been checked. All errors and corrections noted shall be documented. Level 2 data review shall also be documented on a checklist with the signature and date of the reviewer.

4.1.3 LEVEL 3 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA REVIEW.

Level 3 review is performed by the quality assurance officer or the program administrator at the Contractor. This review should be similar to the review as provided in Level 2 except that it should provide a total overview of the data package to ensure its consistency and compliance with this contract. All errors noted shall be corrected and documented. Level 3 data review shall also be documented on a checklist with the signature and date of the reviewer.

4.2 REPORTING DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS

All detected concentrations shall be reported as actual detected values corrected for % moisture (dry-weight) for soil samples and corrected for any sample dilutions for both solid and liquid matrixes. The sample dilution factor (DF) shall be clearly reported with each project sample.

4.3 REPORTING NON-DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS

In general, non-detected concentrations should be reported as "<X," or "XU" where "X" denotes some numerical value and "U" represents a data qualifier for "not detected." When non-detected concentrations are reported as "ND," the term "ND" should be assigned a numerical value for each target analyte based on the DOD QSM requirement to report the data using the LOD, LOQ or the reporting limit (RL) as applicable. LOD, LOQ or RL values should also be corrected for % moisture and sample dilution factors as described above.

4.4 DATA DELIVERABLES

All reports and data shall be archived for a minimum of five (5) years. The standard reporting format requires the reporting of all analytical results along with the supporting QC information. An electronic deliverable shall also be required with each format which will allow the automated uploading of analytical data to FED.

4.4.1 SAMPLE GROUPS

For the purposes of this contract, each shipment of samples (which can be identified by the assignment of a unique work order number) for any one project on any one calendar day shall be reported as a package, unless otherwise approved by FED. The Contractor may end up running samples from different work orders together in the same analytical batch for the same parameter.

4.4.2 STANDARD DATA REPORTING FORMAT

Contractor reports shall be structured to clearly present the entire contract required items. This report shall be organized as follows:

4.4.2.1 GENERAL DISCUSSION

Description of sample types received, tests performed, any problems encountered, and general comments shall be given here. The work order number and project shall be clearly identifiable.

A table shall be presented that clearly shows all samples received that includes the FED sample identification, the Contractor sample identification, the sample matrix, and the tests assigned.

Another table shall be presented that summarizes all failed QC parameters along with corrective actions taken by the Contractor.

4.4.2.2 ANALYTICAL DATA

Data shall be reported by sample or by test. Pertinent information shall include, at a minimum, field sample identification, FED sample identification, Contractor sample number, date sample collected, date sample received at the Contractor, date sample extracted/prepared, date sample analyzed, extraction/preparation/cleanup/analysis procedure(s) used, laboratory preparation batch number(s), laboratory analytical batch number(s), dilution factors, all analytes tested for and their associated reporting limits, matrix, units, % solids for solid samples, surrogate and internal standard recoveries, and sample description, including preservation. Any other factors that could affect the sample results, e.g., air bubbles in volatile organic analysis (VOA) sample vials, excess headspace in soil VOA containers, the presence of multiple phases, etc., shall also be noted. Data for sediment samples shall be reported on a dry weight basis. Both the original and diluted results shall be reported for samples that are reanalyzed due to certain analytes that have exceeded calibration ranges. Results shall be combined together on a single report sheet.

4.4.2.3 LABORATORY PERFORMANCE AND MATRIX SPECIFIC QC INFORMATION

All of the associated method QC information, even if this information was run on another clients sample, shall be reported. This information shall include method blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix duplicates, matrix spikes, matrix spike duplicates, surrogate spikes, and other method specific QC that may have been run. Spiking levels shall be clearly shown. This QC information must be specific to the batch that the field sample analysis was associated with.

Batch numbers shall be clearly shown. Method specific QC information must be reported with all acceptance criteria clearly shown. All method QC must meet the acceptance requirements as stated in this contract. Any deviations from these acceptance criteria must be identified with appropriate corrective actions that have been conducted.

4.4.2.4 OTHER INFORMATION

Any other information that is pertinent to these samples shall also be reported. This shall include copies of original work order letters, original COC forms, copies of cooler receipt forms, copies of any telephone conversation record sheets, and copies of any other forms (e.g., corrective action forms, level 1, level 2, and level 3 data review and validation forms, etc.).

The laboratory shall maintain on file all of the supporting data and documentation for these samples for a minimum of five (5) years. The Contractor shall provide raw data for all of the field samples, QC samples, calibration data and verification standards.

4.4.2.5 PRESENTATION

Sample data and associated method quality control information shall be reported in a standard format as a complete packet representing a batch of samples. The method quality control information should be presented in a standard order following the sample data results. The Contractor should maintain the standard order of reporting to the maximum extent possible.

4.5 REPORT TURNAROUND TIME.

Turnaround time shall be fourteen (14) calendar days for standard delivery from the time of sample pickup. Three accelerated turnaround times, 48 hours, 72 hours or 7 calendar days from the time of sample receipt may also be requested. Payment for accelerated turnaround will be modified upon failure of the Contractor to meet the required turnaround time (e.g., for 72 hour turnaround if the results are received in five (5) calendar days the payment will be for 7 day turnaround). For accelerated turnaround, the Contractor can send the results by facsimile or e-mail initially and follow-up with the standard report.

5.0 CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING (CMR)

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address: http://www.ecmra.mil. Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year of contract performance. Contractors may direct questions to the help desk at help desk at: http://www.ecmra.mil to review user manuals and gain an understanding about the data fields that will be included in the reporting structure that is hosted at http://www.ecmra.mil/.

6.0 OPSEC/SECURITY

6.1 AT LEVEL I TRAINING

All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access Army installations, facilities and controlled access areas shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 14 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. The contractor shall submit http://www.ecmra.mil/ http://www.ecmra.mil/ http://www.ecmra.mil/ certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer, if a COR is not assigned, within 5 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel.

AT level I awareness training is available at the following website: http://jko.jten.mil

6.2 ACCESS AND GENERAL PROTECTION/SECURITY POLICY AND

PROCEDURES ACCESS AND GENERAL PROTECTION/SECURITY

POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall provide all information required for background checks to meet installation access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements (FAR clause 52.204-9, Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel) as directed by DOD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any individual facility or installation change, the Government may require changes in contractor security matters or processes.

5.2.1 FOR CONTRACTORS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE CAC, BUT REQUIRE

ACCESS TO A DOD FACILITY OR INSTALLATION

Contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with adjudication standards and procedures using the National Crime Information Center Interstate Identification Index (NCIC-III) and Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) (Army Directive 2014-05/AR 190-13), applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative), or, at OCONUS locations, in accordance with status of forces agreements and other theater regulations.

5.3 IWATCHING TRAINING

The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall brief all employees on the local iWATCH program (training standards provided by the requiring activity ATO). This local developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the COR. This training shall be completed within 5 calendar days of contract award and within 14 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 30 calendar days after contract award.

7.0 REFERENCES

7.1 National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standard, EPA/600/R-

04/003, 5 June 2003.

7.2 ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, 15 May 2005.

http://jko.jten.mil/

7.3 UNITED STATES FORCES KOREA Regulation 201-1, Environmental Governing Standards, 18 June 2012.

7.4 Department of Defense Environmental Data Quality Workgroup, Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual, Final Version 5.1, dated 2007.

7.5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), EPA QA/G-6 dated April 2007.

7.6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SW 846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, SW 846, 3rd Edition, 1986 and Revision 6, November 2004.

7.7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual EM-385-1-1, Safety and Health Requirements Manual, 30 November 2014.

7.8 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual EM-200-1-3, Requirements for the Preparation of Sampling and Analysis Plans, 1 February 2001.

7.9 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual EM-200-1-6, Chemical Quality Assurance for Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Projects, 10 October 1997.

7.10 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual EM-200-1-10, Guidance for Evaluating Performance Based Chemical Data, 30 June 2005.

7.11 USFK Regulation 201-1, Environmental Governing Standards, 18 June 2012.

7.12 ROK Ministry of Environment Notice No. 2018-65, Official Test Methods for Water Contamination

Table 1. Test items and method list for Laboratory Services Contract

ITEM

NO. Matrix DESCRIPTION Test Method

(or equivalent)

0001AA Soil / Water TPH, Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons EPA 8015

0001AB Soil / Water TPH, Diesel/Oil Range Hydrocarbons EPA 8015

0001AC Soil / Water TPH, Gasoline/Diesel/Oil Range Hydrocarbons EPA 8015

0001AD Soil / Water BTEX & MTBE, SW 846 EPA 8021/8260

0001AE Soil / Water Volatile Organics, SW 846 EPA 8260

0001AF Soil / Water Semivolatile Organics, SW 846 EPA 8270

0001AG Soil / Water Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, SW 846 EPA 8270

0001AH Soil / Water Elements, Single By ICP, SW 846 EPA 6010

0001AJ Soil / Water Elements, Single By ICP/MS, SW 846 EPA 6020

0001AK Soil / Water Mercury, SW 846 EPA 7473

0001AL Soil / Water OP Pesticides, SW 846 EPA 8141

0001AM Soil / Water OC Pesticides, SW846 EPA 8081

0001AN Soil / Water OC Herbicides, SW 846 EPA 8151

0001AP Soil / Water Dioxin, SW 846 EPA 8290

0001AQ Soil / Water PCBs, SW 846 EPA 8082

Drinking water Testing for Table 3-3, 3-7, 3-10 and 3-12 of USFK Regulation 201-1

0001AR Drinking Water Elements, Single By ICP, Drinking Water EPA 200.7

0001AS Drinking Water Elements, Single By ICP/MS, Drinking Water EPA 200.8

0001AT Drinking Water Mercury, Drinking Water EPA 245.1

0001AU Drinking Water Volatile Organics, Drinking Water EPA 524.2

0001AV Drinking Water Semivolatile Organics, Drinking Water EPA 525.2

0001AX Drinking Water Chlorinated Acids, Drinking Water EPA 515.4

0001AY Drinking Water Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) / 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP), Drinking Water EPA 504.1

0001AZ Drinking Water Glyphosate, Drinking Water EPA 547

0001BA Drinking Water Endothall, Drinking Water EPA 548.1

0001BB Drinking Water Diquat, Drinking Water EPA 549.2

(or equivalent)

0001BC Drinking Water OP Pesticides, KSTM, Drinking Water KSTM

0001BD Drinking Water Carbamates, Drinking Water EPA 531.1

0001BE Drinking Water Organohalide Pesticides, Drinking Water EPA 505

0001BF Drinking Water 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) EPA 1613B

0001BG Drinking Water Gross Alpha And Beta EPA 900

0001BH Drinking Water Combined Radium-226 And 228 903.1 & 904

0001BJ Drinking Water Uranium EPA 200.8

0001BK Drinking Water Strontium-90 EPA 905

0001BL Drinking Water Tritium EPA 906

0001BM Drinking Water Phenol EPA 420.4

0001BN Drinking Water Color SM 2120B-2011

0001BP Drinking Water Hardness, CaCO3 SM 2340B

0001BQ Drinking Water Odor KSTM

0001BR Drinking Water Potassium Permanganate Consumption KSTM

0001BS DW / Water Asbestos EPA 100.2

0001BT DW / Water Cyanide, SW 846 / Drinking Water SM 4500CN

0001BU DW / Water Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500NH3 D-

0001BV DW / Water Anions, Each EPA 300

0001BX DW / Water Total Coliform KSTM

0001BY DW / Water Total Dissolved Solids EPA 160.1

0001BZ DW / Water Total Suspended Solids EPA 160.2

0001CA DW / Water Total Solids EPA 160.3

0001CB DW / Water pH EPA 150.1

0001CC DW / Water Turbidity EPA 180.1

0001CD DW / Water Electrical Conductivity EPA 120.1

0001CE DW / Water Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) / Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) EPA 637.1

0001CF Water Alkalinity KSTM

(or equivalent)

0001CG Water BOD KSTM

0001CH Water COD KSTM

0001CJ Water Oil And Grease EPA 1664

Waste water Testing For Table 4-7 of USFK Regulation 201-1

0001CK Waste Water - Normal Hexane Extracts KSTM

0001CL Waste Water - Phenols KSTM

0001CM Waste Water -Cyanide KSTM

0001CN Waste Water - Elements, Single By ICP KSTM

0001CP Waste Water - Hexavalent Chromium KSTM

0001CQ Waste Water - Mercury KSTM

0001CR Waste Water - Organic Phosphorous KSTM

0001CS Waste Water - Fluoride, F KSTM

0001CT Waste Water -PCBS KSTM

0001CU Waste Water -Total Coliform Bacteria KSTM

0001CV Waste Water -Total Suspended Solid KSTM

0001CX Waste Water -Total Nitrogen KSTM

0001CY Waste Water -Total Phosphorus KSTM

0001CZ Waste Water -Trichloroethylene(TCE) /Tetrachloroethylene(PCE) KSTM

0001DA Waste Water -Alkylbenzene Sulfonate (ABS) KSTM

0001DB Waste Water -Dioxin, KSTM KSTM

Hazardous Waste Testing for Appendix B of USFK Regulation 201-1

0001DC Hazardous Waste Ignitability EPA 1010A

0001DD Hazardous Waste Corrosivity EPA 9040C

0001DE Hazardous Waste Reactivity SW846 CHAP 7.3

0001DF Hazardous Waste Metals, TCLP Extract EPA 1311 / 200.7 /

0001DG Hazardous Waste Volatile Organics, TCLP Extract EPA 1311 / 8260

0001DH Hazardous Waste Semivolatile Organics, TCLP Extract EPA 1311 / 8270

(or equivalent)

0001DJ Hazardous Waste OC Pesticides, TCLP Extract EPA 1311 / 8081

0001DK Hazardous Waste OC Herbicides, TCLP Extract EPA 1311 / 8151

0001DL Asbestos Asbestos Bulk Testing By NVLAP Certified Laboratory*, 7 Day Turnaround EPA 600/R-93/116

0001DM Asbestos Asbestos Dust Testing By NVLAP Certified Laboratory*, 7 Day Turnaround ASTM D-6480

0001DN Asbestos Asbestos Bulk Testing By NVLAP Certified Laboratory*, 30 Day Turnaround EPA 600/R-93/116

0001DP Asbestos Asbestos Air Testing By AIHA Certified Laboratory*, 7 Day Turnaround NIOSH 7400

0001DQ Lead Lead Paint Chip Testing By NLLAP Certified Laboratory*, 14 Day Turnaround EPA 7420

0001DR Lead Lead Drinking Water Testing By NLLAP Certified Laboratory*, 14 Day Turnaround EPA 200.8

0001DS Lead Lead Dust Testing By NLLAP Certified Laboratory*, 14 Day Turnaround EPA 7420

4001EB Field Support Asbestos Sampling Support Certified AHERA Inspector N/A

4001EC Field Support Sampling Support Certified HAZWOPER N/A

Notes:

1. Replace Bid Item No designations for the First Option and Second Option Period with "1001AA and 2001AA" respectively.

2. Method version numbers shall be equal or higher than the numbers cited.

3. Matrix-specific MDL studies and SOPs must be submitted for all analytes prior to the start of work.

4. Laboratory certificates requirement

- All the items shall be tested by NELAP accredited laboratory or ROK Water Quality Measurement Agency.

- Asbestos bulk and air and dust samples shall be tested by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP) accredited laboratory.

- Lead paint and drinking water samples shall be tested by The National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP) accredited laboratory.

5. Holding time and sample preservation: see Appendix B, Table B-1 of EM 200-1-3.

6. Reporting Requirement

- PDF documents with case narrative

- Electronic data deliverable (EDD) format

- Sample results (Soil samples corrected for moisture content)

- Method blank

- Lab control sample

- Matrix duplicate

- Matrix spike

- Matrix spike duplicate

- Surrogate recoveries

7. Sampling Support Requirement

- Asbestos sampling personnel shall have US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) equivalent Asbestos Building Inspector certificate and provide training certificates. Asbestos sampling work includes supporting of asbestos bulk sampling from the building material, repair damaged area and sample packing with FED team.

- Sampling personnel shall meet the training requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hazardous Waste and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) and provide training certificates. Sampling support includes supporting of waste water, storm water, hazardous waste and soil sampling with FED team.

8 Aug 2019