Other Transaction Authority Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 69 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912QR-FY28FTBLISS-OTA
About this file
Other Transaction Authority Questionnaire
This document is an Other Transaction Authority (OTA) questionnaire designed to gather information from interested industry partners to help shape the Government's final acquisition strategy for a facility development project. The questionnaire collects basic business identification information including company name, address, point of contact details, CAGE code, Unique Entity Identifier, socioeconomic status, and intended participating role (prime contractor, subcontractor, design firm, or other).
The questionnaire focuses on early contractor involvement and collaborative project delivery approaches. It requests information regarding the minimum level of project detail required prior to Phase 1 (Design/Pre-construction) to assess project viability, recommended collaborative mechanisms (such as joint design charrettes, target-value design workshops, or phased scoping approvals) for the initial 30-90 days, and respondents' experience executing Progressive Design-Build (PDB), Construction Manager at Risk (CM@R), or similar highly collaborative delivery methods involving designers, builders, and owners working together before finalizing a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). Additional sections seek feedback on whether the proposed PDB and CM@R OTA strategy incentivizes participation, alternative acquisition strategies or risk-sharing arrangements that could improve quality, delivery speed, or cost, and each firm's maximum bonding capacity both as a sole prime contractor and as a joint venture partner.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Other Transaction Authority Questionnaire
Interested industry partners are requested to respond to the following questions to help shape the final acquisition strategy:
1. Business Name
2. Business Address
3. Point of Contact (Name, Title,)
4. Phone Number
5. Email Address
6. Cage Code
7. Unique Entity Identifier
8. Socio Economic Status (Other than Small, Small Business, 8(a), etc.)
9. Participating Role (Prime, Subcontractor, Design Firm, other)
OTA / Early Contractor Involvement:
10. What minimum level of detail (e.g., Statement of Need, conceptual site plans, target budget) does your firm require prior to entering Phase 1 (Design/Pre-construction) to feel confident in the project's viability?
11. What collaborative mechanisms (such as joint design charrettes, target-value design workshops, or phased scoping approvals) do you recommend the Government implement in the first 30-90 days to rapidly transition from a "blank page" to a mutually agreed-upon baseline?
12. Describe your experience executing Progressive Design-Build (PDB), Construction Manager at Risk (CM@R), or other highly collaborative delivery methods where designer and builder worked collaboratively with the owner before locking in a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
Feedback on the Acquisition Strategy & Alternatives:
13. Does the proposed PDB and CM@R OTA strategy incentivize your firm to participate?
Why or why not?
14. Are there alternative acquisition strategies, commercial phasing arrangements, or risk-sharing terms that the Government has not considered that would yield a higher quality facility, faster delivery, or lower cost?
Bonding Capability:
15.Specify your maximum bonding (single and aggregate) as a sole prime contractor and/or as a joint venture.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .