Attachment B_Ratings Tables.pdf
PDF 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912QR25R0003
About this file
This document is an attachment containing rating tables for evaluating proposals in response to a federal contract opportunity for architect/engineer services for roofing and building envelope design, evaluation, and analysis services.
The key details are: The contract opportunity is for a 5-year single award task order contract (SATOC) valued up to $15 million to provide a variety of architect/engineer services primarily for roofing and building envelope repair and replacement projects for the Army Reserve nationwide. Selection criteria include professional qualifications, specialized experience/technical competence, capacity, past performance, and volume of DoD A-E contract awards. The opportunity is set aside for small businesses, including small disadvantaged, woman-owned, HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned, and veteran-owned. Proposals are due by October 7, 2024, with an estimated start date of December 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment A_Blank PPQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Ratings:
Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.
TABLE 1
Professional Qualifications, Specialized Experience/Technical Competence, Capacity, and Volume of DoD
AE Contract Awards Ratings
Adjectival Rating Description
Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the synopsis and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.
TABLE 2
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Rating Description
Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Neutral No relevant past performance information is available.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .