W912QR20R0025-0001.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Professional Services for Management and Planning Support
Solicitation number
W912QR20R0025
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W912QR20R0025-0000.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CIVIL/OPS/ENVIRONMENTAL BR

ATTN: GLENN W MOON

600 DR M L KING JR PL RM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2236

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 13

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR20R0025

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Apr-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3.EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Apr-2020

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE 964860

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR20R0025-0001

W912QR20R0025

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES - AMEND 001

Solicitation W912QR20R0025 for the Professional Services for support of the United States Army Reserve Command (USARC); Army Reserve Installation Management Directorate (ARIMD); Army Reserve Division in their work on various Military programs and Regional Support Commands (RSC’s) within the United States and Puerto Rico is hereby modified as follows:

a. Offerors must acknowledge all amendments.

b. Method of submital has changed to electronic submitals only. As such, Section L, PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL OF OFFERS, is hereby deleted and replaced to allow for electronic submitals.

c. The due date and time for responses remains the same 06 May 2020 at 03:00 PM Eastern Time.

d. All other information remains the same.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The number of offeror copies required has decreased by 5 from 6 to 1.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

ELECTRONIC SUBMITAL INSTR

Proposals: ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH DOD SAFE. No paper copies, CD-ROMs or facsimile submissions will be accepted. Electronic Proposal Submission is required through the Army’s Electronic File Sharing Service, DOD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil). The DOD SAFE Application is used to send large files to individuals that would normally be too large to send via email. There are no user accounts for SAFE. Authentication is handled via email.

Anyone has access to DOD SAFE, and the application is available for use by anyone. The SAFE “Getting Started Guide” has information on how to utilize the system (https://safe.apps.mil/about.php). Instructions for uploading are as follows:

1. Send an email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist to receive the link to drop off your proposal. This will need to be completed three (3) business days prior to proposal due date.

a. Glenn Moon, Contract Specialist at Glenn.w.moon@usace.army.mil

b. Emily Moore, Contracting Officer at Emily.A.Moore@usace.army.mil

2. You will receive an email with the link to submit your drop-off. The link will be provided no later than two

(2) business days prior to the proposal due date.

3. Short Note to the Recipients: Click the Add Files or Drag and Drop your files. For file description, enter

W912QR20R0025-FIRMNAME.

4. Click Upload button to send documents.

5. Guest users will need to check their email to verify their email address before the recipients will be notified. (Government-issued Common Access Cards (CACs) are not required).

File Size Limitations: Offerors are advised to follow the DOD SAFE instructions for uploading files. DOD SAFE supports delivery up to 8GB. If needed, Offerors are advised to break the files down into smaller sections in order to upload it to the system. In such cases, please divide the sections as logically as possible and be sure to clearly name the files as specified below.

File Naming Convention: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention:

W912QR20R0025-FIRMNAME-VOLUME I

W912QR20R0025-FIRMNAME-VOLUME II

Each file name shall begin with the solicitation number followed by the firm’s name and a brief file description.

Please see examples above.

File Organization: Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be 10 or larger. Pages shall be letter sized (larger page sizes (such as 11x17 fold-outs, etc.) will be counted as two pages. Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors. Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented. Information pertaining to more than one evaluation factor should be repeated in the each section for each factor.

Upload Completion & Deadline: Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on the solicitation document. The time & date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion / delivery time & date recorded within DOD SAFE site. Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files (e.g. 10MB or more) will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208.

Electronic Files: Files shall be in their native format (i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text. Text and graphics portfolios of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by Microsoft Office or Adobe applications. Data submitted in a spreadsheet format shall be readable by MS Excel (all cells and formulas should be unlocked).

Any information, presented in a proposal that the Offeror wants safeguarded from disclosure to other parties must be identified and labeled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017),” subparagraph (e), which is found in Section L of the RFP. The Government will endeavor to honor the restrictions against release requested by Offerors, to the extent permitted under United States law and regulations.

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

SECTION L – PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL OF OFFERS

1. SUBMITTAL OF OFFERS

1.1 Offerors submitting proposals for these projects should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and money will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror’s Past Performance, Management, and Price and Pro Forma Information to successfully complete the projects. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the Request for Proposal (RFP). Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award. Requirements stated in this RFP are minimums. A table of contents is provided in Table I below:

Table I – Proposal Format

VOLUME I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTORS (Three Ring Binder) TAB A Factor I - Past Performance TAB B Factor II - Management Plan VOLUME II – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION (Separate Sealed Envelope) TAB A Standard Form 33, Solicitation Offer and Award TAB B Contract Rate Pricing TAB C Pre-Award Information/Joint Venture and Mentor-Protégé Agreements TAB D Compensation for Professional Employees

1.2 Clarifications of Provisions for this RFP. All questions including those from an offeror regarding the meaning or interpretation of this RFP shall be requested in writing via bidder inquiry in ProjNet as indicated in the Request for Proposal (See ProjNet Instructions in RFP).

1.3 Offerors shall submit their proposals electronically via DOD SAFE in accordance with the the provided

Electronic submital instructions no later than the time and date specified in Block 9 of Standard Form 33.

Glenn Moon is the sole point of contact for this acquisition.

1.4 Content of Proposals. The Government intends to make the award selection without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission; however, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

1.5 The proposal must be complete and contain the offeror’s most favorable terms. The proposal shall address and contain the information set forth in the solicitation. The information will be used by the Source Selection Evaluation Board to evaluate each proposal. Offerors are advised that conciseness and relevance of the proposal is important and unrelated information that is not pertinent may reduce evaluation ratings.

Additionally, should the proposal include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the proposal may be determined to be “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award.

1.6 Offerors are required to submit a proposal made up of a Technical Proposal and a Price Proposal. All proposal materials shall be provided electronical via DOD SAFE with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified below. Volume I, Technical Proposal Evaluation Factors, SHALL be submitted in original electronically via DOD SAFE.

Volume II, (Price and Pro Forma Information) SHALL be submitted in original electronically via DOD

SAFE. There is a limit of 50 pages total (excluding Tab dividers, Title Page, Table of Contents, List of Acronyms). Pages are to be numbered consecutively throughout the submittal. Small font size (no smaller than 9) is permissible for usage in charts and tables as long as it is easily readable. Letters, awards, or other commendations do count toward the 50 page limitation. All pages must be 8 ½” x 11”. Format restrictions will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted which exceeds the specified limits will not be evaluated.

*NOTE: Provide the complete Volume I proposal submittal including text, renderings, drawings, photographs, etc.

in accordance with the Electronic Submital instructions. Provide the complete Volume II proposal electronically via DOD SAFE with the final price breakout schedule. HARDCOPY SUBMITALS WILL

NOT BE ACCEPTED.

2. VOLUME I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTORS - SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Tab A – Factor I - Past Performance - Submission Requirements

2.1.1 The offeror shall provide summary descriptions of up to five (5) completed or substantially completed projects of similar scope to this contract. Projects, for purpose of this solicitation, are defined as contracts, including individual task orders that are complete or substantially complete.

*Substantially complete status for purposes of this section refers to projects that are, at a minimum, 75% or more complete based on project cost and scope.

2.1.2 If submitting as a joint venture, the joint venture offeror may submit its own projects or projects completed or substantially completed by one of its joint venturers. Note that small business joint ventures are required to submit a copy of their joint venture agreement in accordance with Section L, Paragraph 3.3, below.

2.1.3 The projects provided should best illustrate the qualifications and experience of the offeror; at a minimum each project should address the following information:

a. Project name and location;

b. Brief description reflecting capabilities described in Section C of this solicitation;

c. Percentage of work performed by prime contractor (work not subcontracted);

d. Contract type (firm fixed price, fixed fee, cost plus fixed fee, performance based, etc.);

e. Customer (by name and type, i.e. government, private sector);

f. Percent of project completion (if not completed) and site closure status with regulators (if applicable);

g. The negotiated price/cost vs. actual price (or price-to-date); and

h. Proposed schedule vs. actual schedule.

2.1.4 Provide references for all of the project experience identified above. Referenced information should include:

a. Project name,

b. Location,

c. Owner’s name,

d. Point of contact, and

e. Telephone number.

2.1.5 Include any ratings, letters, awards, etc., which support past performance on these projects.

2.1.6 A sample Project Detail Sheet is attached, but Offerors may use their own formats so long as all required information is provided, keeping in mind the formatting and page limitations at Section L, Paragraph 1.6, above.

2.1.7 To the greatest extent practicable, offerors should provide past performance quality information on the attached USACE/NAVFAC PPQ form or should provide a CPARS evaluation. Failure to provide past performance quality information in either of these formats may result in the Source Selection Evaluation Board being unable to fully evaluate submitted projects.

2.2 Tab B – Factor II – Management Plan - Submission Requirements

2.2.1 Provide a management plan for the project that describes the following:

a. How your labor, resources, and subcontractors will be coordinated and used to ensure successful completion of the project;

b. How you will manage, supervise and coordinate the subcontractors' work, and who in the organization will be responsible for this management and coordination;

c. Your home office support capabilities and home office staffing;

d. The scheduling process for multiple, simultaneous contracts; and

e. Your process for submitting invoices.

2.2.2 When writing and submitting the management plan, offerors should keep in mind the formatting and page limitations at Section L, Paragraph 1.6, above.

3. VOLUME II – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION (SEALED ENVELOPE) -

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Tab A – Standard Form 33 and the Contract Rate Schedule - Submission Requirements

3.1.1 The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 33 (SF33), which is included in Section B of this solicitation.

3.1.2 The offeror is cautioned that the SF33 must contain an original signature in Block 17 of the form.

3.1.3 The offeror shall provide the name, title, telephone number, and email address of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Additionally, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

3.2 Tab B – Contract Rate Pricing - Submission Requirements

3.2.1 The offeror shall complete the Contract Rate Schedule, which is included in Section B of this solicitation.

3.2.2 All total hourly rates shall include overhead, general and administrative costs, labor burden fringes, or other costs, but shall be exclusive of profit.

3.2.3 Profit will negotiated on a Task Order basis.

3.3 Tab C – Pre-Award Information/Joint Venture and Mentor-Protégé Agreements - Submission

Requirements

3.3.1 The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section K, Representations and Certifications.

3.3.2 The offeror shall submit the following information:

a. Number of years the firm has been in business

b. Name, address and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c. A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

d. Financial capability – Submit proof of financial ability with the most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities. Include the names, address and telephone number of firm’s banking institution

3.3.3 Small business offerors (e.g., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSBC, etc) submitting a proposal as a Joint Venture or

Mentor-Protégé Joint Venture shall submit evidence from the Offeror's SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or Business Opportunity Specialist.

3.3.4 Small Business Joint Venture agreements and approved 8(a) Mentor-Protégé agreements must be submitted with the proposal.

3.4 Tab D – Compensation for Professional Employees - Submission Requirements

3.4.1 The offeror shall submit their "total compensation plan" in accordance with FAR 52.222-46(a), setting forth salaries and fringe benefits proposed for the professional employees who will work under the contract.

3.4.2 The offeror shall also submit supporting information, to include data, such as recognized national and regional compensation surveys and studies of professional, public and private organizations, used in establishing the total compensation structure, pursuant to FAR 52.222-46(a).

3.4.3 Per FAR 52.222-46(d), failure to comply with the provisions of 52.222-46 may constitute sufficient cause to justify rejection of a proposal.

PROJECT DETAIL SHEET

Your firm’s name _______________________________________________________________

Name of Project/Location/________________________________________________________

General Scope of Project

Your role (prime, joint venture, subcontractor) and work your company self-performed

Percentage of Work completed by Prime Contractor Personnel: ___________________________%

Contract Cost/Price:

At Award: $_______________ Reason for the cost/price growth:

Final Co/Pr $_______________ ___________________________________

Award Date: ____________

Scheduled Completion: _____________ Reason for the time growth:

Actual Completion: _____________ ___________________________________

Extent and type of work you subcontracted out

Owner’s Point of Contact (POC) for reference (name and company and telephone number)

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE

AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE

COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance

E VG S M U N

with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

(End of Summary of Changes)

SF30
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION L

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .