W912QR19R0011_Specs-0006.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation W912QR19R0011 for the establishment of an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Design Build and Design Bid Build Multiple Aw ard Task Order Contract (MATOC) to support the military construction (MILCON) and operations and maintenance (O&M) funded construction requirements for the U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, Army Reserve and Air Force Reserve nationw ide programs in the Western Region is hereby amended as follow s:

See Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR19R0011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Jul-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Apr-2021

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR19R0011_Specs-0006

W912QR19R0011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006 - SUMMARY OF CH

Solicitation W912QR19R0011 Amendment #0006 Summary of Changes

a. Section 01 20 00.00 06 is replaced in it’s entirety.

b. Section 01 57 19.00 06 is replaced in it’s entirety.

c. Section 00 22 18 Paragraph 5.1.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative is amended to remove the roofing system from the building features.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00 22 18

SECTION 00 22 18

PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION OF OFFERS FOR PHASE II

1. Overview

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select up to seven (7) contractors for Firm Fixed Price Multiple Award

Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) for primarily Design and Construction (D/B) projects within the Louisville District Area of Responsibility to support the U.S. Army Reserves, U.S. Air Force Reserves, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army programs.

1.2 This is a two-phase procurement and the basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off Process. Potential offerors are invited to submit the information described in this Section 00 22 16 for review and evaluation by the Government. Following completion of the evaluation of Phase I, up to a maximum of ten (10) most highly qualified offerors will be selected to participate in Phase II. The selected offerors for Phase II will be invited to submit the information described in Section 00 22 18, Procedures for Submittal of Offers for Phase II, for review and evaluation by the Government. Price will be evaluated in Phase II through use of a sample project and binding contract rates. No seed task order will be awarded as a result of this solicitation.

Only the base MATOCs will be awarded. The basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off process.

Following completion of the Phase II evaluation, the Contracting Officer will award up to seven (7) contracts to the responsible offerors whom the Source Selection Authority determines conform to the solicitation, are fair and reasonable, and offer the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offers or to reject all offers. For Phase II submittals, requirements stated in this RFP are minimums.

1.3 The sample project has an estimated cost range between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.

NOTE: The rating information from Phase I will not be considered in Phase II or in the final selection.

2. Submittal of Offers.

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's capability for successfully completing the solicited project. For Phase II, requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums.

Innovative, creative, or cost-saving proposals that meet or exceed the requirements are encouraged and will be rated accordingly. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.

2.2 Offerors shall submit their proposals electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission

Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation. Please follow the instructions precisely as proposals must complete the upload no later than the time and date specified in the modification for Phase II.

NOTE: The Louisville District is in the Eastern Time Zone.

2.3 The Government is using a two-phase procurement approach for this design/build project. For Phase II, offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. All proposal materials shall be submitted in binders with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I for Phase II shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission

Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation and shall include the following information:

Volume I – Factor I: Design/Technical o Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings o Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative

Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

*NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab (factor or sub factor) may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information. Any specified page limits will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit(s) will not be evaluated.

2.5 Volume II for Phase II shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation and shall include the following information:

• Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule

• Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements

• Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

• Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information

*NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

3. Proposal Evaluation Process

3.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated above.

3.2 The evaluation process for Phase II essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance / Responsibility Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete, that both a technical and price proposal were received, and that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the Phase II Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements. Factor I and Factor II will be rated using Tables 5 and 6 below. The SSEB will assign an adjectival descriptor to the Technical Factors and corresponding Sub-factors (if any). The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weakness, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings (see Table 5) and risk descriptions (see Table 6) below.

3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.4 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of technical proposals and compare prices. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors

4.1 Phase II proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors and sub factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are considered approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

4.2 Volume I – Factor I: Design/Technical 1st

Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings Equal to Sub-factor 2

Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative

Equal to Sub-factor 1

4.3 Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach 2nd

4.4 Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information Not Rated

Tab A Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated Tab B Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable) Not Rated Tab C Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of

Financial Ability Not Rated

Tab D Pre-Award Information Not Rated

4.5 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

Table 5

Technical / Risk Assessment Ratings Adjectival

Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 6

Technical Risk Description Adjectival Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.

Normal contractor efforts and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

4.6 Definitions

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

7. Clarification. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation.

5. Volume I – Factor I: Design / Technical

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings:

Submit ANSI D half size scalable to fit 11” x 17” sheets. The proposed design drawings shall provide the information as follows:

BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS

Include the following:

Floor Plans Color Site Plan with all feature

NOTE: floor plans need to include all design development of all disciplines

NOTE: There is a limit of 15 (fifteen) drawings for the Design Drawings sub factor using 11” x 17” sheets.

All information must be clearly legible. Any information that is not clearly legible may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

*****************************************Amendment 0006***********************************

5.1.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative:

Provide a clear and concise narrative describing the project, while specifically addressing the following site and building features:

Architectural Mechanical Structural Site Work / Utility Connections & Routing

ASHRAE

AT/FP

Electrical Fire Protection/Suppression

NOTE: There is a limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the Design Narrative sub factor.

*****************************************Amendment 0006***********************************

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings:

Design Drawings will be reviewed for thoroughness, functionality, quality of materials, and an understanding of the project requirements. Drawings that exceed the minimum requirements or offer building system preferences listed in Section 01 20 00.00 06, Statement of Work, may receive additional consideration.

5.2.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative:

The Design Narrative will be evaluated for completeness and thoroughness by including the building features of the RFP as outlined in Section 01 20 00.00 06, Statement of Work. Proposals that offer building system preferences or demonstrate a complete understanding of the project requirements in Section 01 20

00.00 06, Statement of Work, may receive additional consideration.

6. Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

6.1 Submission Requirements:

6.1.1 Provide a management plan narrative for the project that describes how your labor, resources, designers, subcontractors, and material suppliers will be managed, supervised, coordinated, and used to ensure successful completion of the project. Additionally, the Management Plan shall include the following information:

Describe the duties of the key project delivery staff and how this team will work together to deliver the project, both during the design and construction phases.

A commissioning plan to include an outline of systems to be commissioned, commissioning timeline, and documents to be provided. Commissioning plan shall be tailored to the activities to complete the sample project

Provide an organizational chart for this project showing home office support, on-site management, and the responsible chain of command. JV offerors must show the respective areas of responsibility for each partner. Clearly delineate on-site from off-site personnel on the organizational chart.

NOTE: There is a page limit of eight (8) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the narrative portion of this factor.

NOTE: There is a page limit of one (1) single sided, 11” x 17” page, for the organizational chart portion of this factor. Any information that exceeds these page limits will not be evaluated.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

6.2.1 Management Plan

Management Plan narratives will be evaluated based on the level of understanding of the work and the involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed during construction of the project. Narratives that demonstrate a clear understanding of the project requirements and provide a thorough approach for successfully managing the solicited project may be rated more favorably by the SSEB. The offeror’s organizational chart will be evaluated based on the clarity, adequacy, capabilities, and strengths for successfully managing the solicited project.

Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information

7.1 Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

7.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

7.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The price will be evaluated on base proposal plus all options. The price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. Price will also be checked for unbalancing of line items.

Offerors are cautioned to distribute costs appropriately.

7.2 Tab B – Joint Venture Agreements

7.2.1 Submission Requirements:

If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, or the offeror listed in Block 14 is a joint venture (JV), the offeror shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a legal entity separate from the individual joint venture members. However, each member of the JV must submit its own Unique Entity Identifier (formally DUNS number) with the proposal. A copy of the offeror's signed joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. In addition to the joint venture agreement, small business offerors submitting a proposal as a Mentor-Protégé JV under the SBA 8(a) or All Small Business Mentor- Protégé programs shall submit a copy of their SBA-approved Mentor-Protégé agreement.

7.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

Small business joint venture agreements must comply with the relevant regulations in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations in order for an offeror to be eligible for any small business set-aside acquisitions and/or small business-related price preference.

7.3 Tab C – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

7.3.1 Submission Requirements:

A. Financial Capability. Submit Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities). Include the name, address, and telephone number of offeror's banking institution. If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

B. Bonding Capability. Submit information showing offeror's ability to be bonded for this project. Include the name, address, and telephone number of the offeror's bonding company.

7.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

See FAR Part 28 for information related to bonds.

7.4 Tab D – Pre-Award Information

7.4.1 Submission Requirements:

A. The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certification.

B. The offeror shall submit the following information:

a) Number of years the firm has been in business

b) Name, address, and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

7.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

(End of Summary of Changes)

BAEY 160033 Repair Fuel Cell, Dock 4, Building 1077, Beale AFB, CA

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

SECTION

01 20 00.00 06

Task Order SCOPE OF WORK

02/13

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL

The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, supplies, and consultant services and all site investigations, surveys, analysis, sampling, testing and verification of existing field conditions as required for design and construction of the Repair Fuel Cell, Dock 4, Building 1077 Project at Beale AFB, CA to result in a complete and useable Facility. Contractor shall provide complete design analysis incorporating all engineering computations, analysis, test and survey results, building code (including fire protection, life safety, environmental and accessibility) review as it pertains / affects / relates to this project, equipment and material data and documentation of existing conditions.

1.2 SCOPE OF WORK

Unless specifically noted otherwise in this Specification Section or in the base MATOC contract Volume 1 of 2 itself, all requirements of the base MATOC contract Volume 1 of 2 shall apply to this Task Order. The work includes design and construction services to repair Dock 4, Building 1077 to provide a fully functional fuel cell hangar in compliance with UFC 3-600-01, UFC 4-211- 01 and NFPA 101 (Title 1) governing fire safety and fuel cell operations.

Design and construction shall comply with the requirements contained in this Task Order Request for Proposal (RFP). The design and technical criteria contained and cited in this RFP and the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) establish minimum standards for design and construction quality. The Designers of Record shall use the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) and the requirements contained in this RFP to fully develop the technical specifications and construction drawings. The objective of this solicitation is to obtain an energy efficient, durable, maintainable and sustainable space.

The illustrations and exhibits included in this RFP illustrate the conceptual design of the project and are provided to define the scope of work and budget. The concepts provided shall be further developed by the Design/Build Contractor to comply with the customer’s functional needs.]

All demolition required to construct the project is included as part of the work of this Contract.

1.3 SITE LOCATION

This project is located in Building 1077 at Beale AFB, CA.

W912QR19R0011-0005

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

1.4 EXISTING SITE UTILITIES

1.4.1 The contractor shall verify the capacity of all utilities serving the building. Upgrading the existing utilities, (unless noted otherwise) outside the limits of construction, is not a part of this project.

1.5 BID OPTIONS

1.5.1 Option 1 – The contractor shall install gypsum board on the front (plan north) interior walls of the hangar bay from +6 feet above finished floor (AFF) to +21 feet above finished floor, Room 100, Building 1077. Paint the existing metal wainscot, new gypsum board, and CMU walls from the floor to +21 feet in hanger bay and the nose dock area.

1.5.2 Option 2 – The contractor shall install gypsum board on the front (plan north) interior walls of the hangar bay from +21 feet AFF to +31 feet AFF.

Tape, float and paint the gypsum board.

1.5.3 Option 3 – The contractor shall replace the fuel resistant floor coatings, Room 100, Building 1077.

1.5.4 Option 4 – The contractor shall service the upper and lower wheels on the hangar doors and provide electric drive motors, power cords, limit switches and door pick-ups to permit the existing hangar doors to be opened and closed without supplemental effort.

1.6 APPENDICES

Information provided in the Attachments is intended to guide the completion of the design by establishing existing conditions, and the desired character, appearance, and function of the new construction. The following Attachments are included and shall be used and strictly adhered-to in completing the design and construction of the project.

a. APPENDIX 1: 2017 Conceptual Drawings

b. APPENDIX 2: 1963 As-Built Drawings

c. APPENDIX 3: 2011 As-Built Drawings

d. APPENDIX 4: 2013 Hangar Evaluation Installation Report

e. APPENDIX 5: 2016 Dock 5 As-Awarded Fire Protection Drawings

f. APPENDIX 6: 2017 Hazardous Materials Survey

1.7 PERMITS

The Contractor shall investigate and submit any permits necessary for the construction of this project. All permit applications shall be completed by the Contractor and provided to the Contracting Officer for submittal to the appropriate agency. Contractor shall pay all permit fees. Copies of all permits shall be provided to the USACE.

1.8 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

1.8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

The contractor shall comply with the National Environmental Protection Act and all other Air Force Environmental regulations.

1.8.2 DUST CONTROL

Contractor shall maintain all work areas free from excess dust to such reasonable degree as to avoid causing a hazard to base personnel or surrounding facilities. Dust control shall be performed as the work proceeds and whenever a dust nuisance or hazard occurs.

1.8.3 ASBESTOS No asbestos containing material shall be used.

1.8.4 MSDS SHEETS

A Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is required for all building materials except for wood, glass, or steel. The MSDS shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer with the contractor’s final design submission.

1.8.5 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT

Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer (CO) the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for chemical materials to be used during the project prior to the contract award in accordance with FAR Clause 52.223-3. The Contractor shall provide MSDSs’ to the Contracting Officer for review prior to the contractor bringing products on the installation. The contractor must inventory all chemical materials, including but not limited to: solvents, paints, degreasers, greases, Ozone Depleting Substances, and oils, brought on base. A chemical material inventory must be maintained when used containing the nomenclature, manufacturer, part number, quantity, storage location, and the process in which the material is used. All chemical materials shall be managed in accordance with federal, state, local, and Installation regulations.

1.8.6 PAINT

All paints must meet Green Seal Certification and be low VOC. See the table below for additional guidance. Paint containing lead shall not be used during any painting process. An MSDS shall be submitted for all paint products used.

For this kind of product:

VOCs (in g/L) shall not exceed:

Flat Topcoat 50

Non-Flat Topcoat 100

Primer or Undercoat 100

Floor Paint 100

Anti-Corrosive Coating 250

Reflective Wall Coating 50

Reflective Roof Coating 100

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

1.8.7 PLUMBING FIXTURES AND TRIM

No plumbing fixture trim shall be installed unless they conform to the voluntary standard NSF/ANSI Standards 24 and 61. Products certified under these standards are tested to ensure no leaching from the fixtures exceeds 11 parts per billion of lead.

1.8.8 POTABLE WATER

If construction or modification of a potable water system is included as a part of the task order scope of work, the contractor is responsible to insure that all potable water connections are protected adequately with anti-siphon devices in accordance with the plumbing code. An ASSE approved anti-siphon device shall be attached to the hose bib prior to mixing chemicals, etc. A backflow prevention device must be installed at each location potable water enters a facility. This includes fire suppression.

1.8.9 WASTE WATER

Absolutely no chemical products shall be allowed to be dumped in any drainage system, storm drain, wash rack, septic system or sanitary sewer. All remaining and residual chemicals shall be taken away by the contractor.

1.8.10 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTCES

The contractor shall implement the best management practices set forth in the AF Form 813 attached to this section.

1.8.11 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

Soil disturbance during this project, including equipment staging areas, shall require erosion control measures. For projects that disturb more than an acre, a Notice of Intent (NOI) must be approved by the applicable State EPA, DOW or DEQ prior to any soil being disturbed as well as a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) reviewed and accepted by the government.

For projects that disturb less than an acre of soil, an erosion control plan is required prior to soil disturbance.

1.9 NOT USED

1.10 NOT USED

1.11 NOT USED

1.12 NOT USED

1.13 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS

1.13.1 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER

In addition to the superintendent, CQC staff and safety staff required by this section and MATOC TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL and SECTION 01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, the contractor shall provide a full time Construction Project Manager for the entire life of this contract including both the design and construction

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

1.13.2 SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER

The SSHO shall be:

a. assigned as SSHO, but may have duties as the Superintendent, and shall not be the CQC System Manager.

b. The SSHO and any alternate shall meet the qualifications included in

MATOC TECHNICAL SPECIFICTIONS SECTION 01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY

REQUIREMENTS.

c. The Contractor shall identify the SSHO for this project and shall submit qualifications to the Government in resume form for acceptance.

1.13.3 The appropriate CQC personnel shall be present at the construction site as needed during work related to their areas of responsibility. In addition to the requirements of MATOC TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 45

00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL, designer CQC personnel resumes and site visit frequency shall be identified in the Design Quality Control Plan (DQCP) and accepted by the government.

2.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

2.1 GENERAL

The Contractor shall prepare complete construction documents for all work designed as required by the RFP. The construction documents to be prepared shall include, but are not limited to, construction drawings, specifications, submittals, and design analysis as required in Section 01 33 16.00 10 DESIGN DATA (DESGIN AFTER AWARD). Materials and equipment shall be limited to those specified except that where no specific material and equipment is specified or no basis of design is identified, the Contractor shall use materials and equipment accepted within the construction industry and in compliance with Design Criteria.

2.2 DESIGN

The Contractor shall prepare a 100% design for the project in accordance with the RFP using industry standard materials and efficient practices. The design of the materials selected shall be high quality, durable and easily maintained. The Contractor shall be responsible for the professional quality, code compliance, technical accuracy, and coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other documents or publications upon which the design and construction are based. It shall be the responsibility

BAEY 160033 Repair Fuel Cell, Dock 4, Building 1077, Beale AFB, CA

**SAFETY PAYS**

AMENDMENT #004*****************************************************************

phases. The Construction Project Manager shall have a degree in Construction Management or Engineering with a minimum of 5 years of documentable experience managing projects of increasing complexity and scale.

The Project Manager does not have to be present full time on-site, but needs to be dedicated to this project alone. The following personnel are required full-time during all activities; superintendent(s); SSHO; CQC Manager; CQC discipline specific professional;

************************************************************AMENDMENT #004

AMENDMENT #005*****************************************************************

*************************************************************AMENDMENT #005

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

of the Design/ Build Contractor to verify the accuracy of the documents provided.

All work described within SECTION 01 20 00.00 06 TASK ORDER SCOPE OF WORK shall conform to the requirements of Section 01 33 16.00 10 DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD), latest version of the USACE Louisville District Design Guide, the latest version of all applicable International Building Codes, the latest version of the NFPA Standards, the latest versions of applicable UFC Codes, the latest version of the Beale AFB Installation Development Design (ID2), Beale AFB Design Compatibility Guide, the latest versions of the codes, criteria, references, and standards referenced herein and in MATOC

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

and the latest versions of UFGS Guide specifications referenced herein. Refer to drawings and the appendices for further details.

All applicable Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS): Louisville District (LRL) versions of the guide specifications shall be used in all cases where they are applicable; these specification sections have a 5th level identifier of 06 (Example: 23 05 93.00 06).

The order of precedence for all other specification sections shall be as follows:

1. USACE-Louisville editions with 5th level identifier of 06

2. Air Force editions with 5th level identifier of 40.

3. Unified edition with no 5th level identifier.

References from UFC and UFGS shall be criteria. References from the International Mechanical Code and International Plumbing Code shall be criteria; apply references from these documents in accordance with the UFC (Example: References to the International Fuel Gas Code must be considered to be references to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 54 and NFPA 58.) Comply with the most stringent requirements. In the case of conflict, the following order of precedence shall be followed:

1. The specific requirements of this specification section.

2. Military Criteria including UFC.

3. Industry Criteria including IMC and IPC.

4. Unified Facilities Guide Specifications.

2.3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INTENT

The intent of this RFP section is to describe the requirements for appearance, function, materials, and types of construction in sufficient detail to enable engineering and design to be completed by the Contractor.

2.4 COORDINATION BETWEEN THE VARIOUS DISCIPLINES

The Contractor shall be responsible for the coordination between all disciplines in order to fulfill the requirements of this contract and to provide for a complete, integrated, and functional design.

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

2.5 QUALITY OF WORK

2.5.1 Construction documents shall be of sufficient detail to afford a clear understanding of the construction work required. The work shall be organized in a manner that shall assure thorough coordination between the various details on the drawings and the specifications. The Contractor shall crosscheck all work until all conflicts have been reconciled.

2.5.2 Where not more specifically described in any of the various sections of this RFP, workmanship shall conform to all of the methods and operations of best standards and accepted practices of the trade or trades involved, and shall include all items of fabrication, construction, or installation regularly furnished or required for completion (including any finish), and for successful operation as intended.

2.5.3 All work shall be executed by personnel or workers skilled in their respective lines of work.

2.5.4 When completed, all parts shall have been durably and substantially built and shall present a neat, workmanlike appearance.

2.5.5 Acceptance of completed work shall be based on its conformance to this request for proposal (RFP), all RFP references and the contractor’s accepted Technical Proposal. Nonconforming work shall be rejected. The Government is not obligated to accept nonconforming work at a reduced price.

The contractor shall start replacement or correction of rejected work within 10 calendar days after receipt of the rejection notice.

2.6 RFP DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA

2.6.1 All designs and construction document drawings and specifications shall be prepared to comply with the RFP. The RFP documents set forth the parameters for the development of a full and complete design.

2.6.2 RFP documents are provided as a performance standard. The Contractor is required to independently prepare and submit for approval a complete design. The Contractor’s Design Professionals shall independently confirm and be responsible for the technical accuracy and adequacy of all aspects of the design.

2.6.3 All remaining design work necessary for a “full and complete” design shall be performed by the Contractor based on the design criteria as required by the RFP. No deviations from the criteria shall be allowed unless prior approval is obtained from the Contracting Officer. All questions or problems encountered by the Contractor in following criteria shall be promptly submitted with recommendations to the Contracting Officer for approval.

2.6.4 TASK ORDER SCOPE OF WORK defines the design and performance criteria. The applicable building codes and standards shall be used as the minimum criteria to develop the construction documents for areas of work not specifically defined.

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

2.6.5 SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD) defines the format and submittal requirements in which the design and the construction documents shall be prepared by the Contractor.

2.6.6 The Division 01 technical specifications included in this RFP provide additional design criteria to define performance. The technical specifications are not complete specifications and have not been developed or intended to be used as construction document specifications. They specify minimum requirements that shall be required in the final design and construction.

The Contractor's Designers of Record shall develop all necessary construction document technical specifications for all areas of the work, from the latest 48 division UFGS Guide specifications. The technical specifications shall be developed from the 48 division Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS). The Louisville District (LRL) versions of the UFGS shall be used in all cases where applicable. All other specifications shall be the UFGS guide specifications unless otherwise indicated or not available. The specifications shall be edited to include installation specific requirements.

If a specification section is not available in UFGS, the Designer of Record shall develop one using a Specs Intact template. See SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD)for further technical specification preparation requirements.

2.7 APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS

Unless a specific document version or date is indicated, use criteria from the most current references including any applicable addenda, unless otherwise stated in the contract or task order, as the date of the Contractor’s latest accepted proposal or date of issue of the contract or task order solicitation, whichever is later. In the event of conflict between References and/or Applicable Military Criteria, apply the most stringent requirement, unless otherwise specifically noted in the contract or task order.

This list is not intended to be a complete list. All work shall be designed and constructed to meet all state and federal codes, standards and laws.

Refer to the technical specifications for other standards and references not listed below.

AMENDMENT #002************************************************************

Uniform Facilities Criteria (UFC)

Louisville District Military Design Guide (LDMDG)

Installation Design Guides/Technical Design Guides

US Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual EM 385-1-1,current edition

IBC - International Building Code, current edition (2018)

IMC - International Mechanical Code, current edition

IPC - International Plumbing Code, current edition

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

2.8 ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

The facilities shall be fully accessible to physically disabled persons and shall conform to ABA Accessibility Standard for Department of Defense facilities, October 2008.

2.9 FORCE PROTECTION & ANTI-TERRORISM CONSIDERATIONS

This facility qualifies as a low-occupancy facility in accordance UFC 4-010- 01 and UFC 4-010-02. No additional force protection / antiterrorism considerations are required.

2.10 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT

The design shall be developed using the English system of units.

2.11 REQUIRED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS

The contractor shall provide the following design professionals for the design of this project with the experience indicated below:

NEC - National Electrical Code, current edition (2020)

NFPA - National Fire Protection Association Codes and Standards, current edition

ANSI - American National Standards Institute Standards

IES - Illuminating Engineering Society Lighting Handbook

NEMA - National Electrical Manufacturer's Association

NESC - National Electrical Safety Code, current edition (2017)

UL - Underwriters Laboratories

ASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers

OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Act Requirements.

ABA Accessibility Standard for Department of Defense Facilities (October 2008)

UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities (2016), Change 3 (2019).

Federal Property Management Regulations 41 C.F.R. Chapter 1

Air Force Sustainable Design and Development Implementing Guidance (2011)

*************************************************************AMENDMENT #002

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

The contractor shall provide the following design professionals for the design of this project with the experience indicated below:

Mechanical Engineer (Designer of Record) with at least 10 years of experience in HVAC design.

Electrical Engineer (Designer of Record) with at least 10 years of experience in electrical design.

Structural Engineer (Designer of Record), registered in the State of California, with at least 10 years of experience in structural and seismic design.

Architect (Designer of Record) with at least [10] years of experience in building renovation design.

Fire Protection Engineer (Designer of Record) A registered professional engineer (P.E.) who has passed the fire protection engineering written examination administered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveys (NCEES) and has relevant fire protection engineering experience.

All designers of record shall be registered professionals (professional engineer, registered architect or certified by NCIDQ) in a state within the United States of America. A post-award construction submittal with resumes detailing the experience and credentials of the designers shall be included in the DQCP.

2.12 DESIGN SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION MATRIX

Submittal Reviewers & Mailing Addresses Copies Required

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2

CELRL-ED-M-R

ATTN: Nick Turpen 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Place Louisville, KY 40202-2232

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2 Sacramento Resident Office ATTN: Fred Martin 2194 Ascot Avenue Rio Linda, CA 95673-9988

9 CES/CEN (Robert Chambers) 2 6451 B Street Bldg. 2535 Beale AFB, CA 95903

* Submittals shall include both electronic and hard copies. All hard copies shall be half-size, except for the certified final submittal.

3.0 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

3.1 SUMMARY

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

3.1.1 The requirements include:

a. Construction considerations and use of the premises.

b. Protection of personnel and Government property.

c. Construction facilities and job site standards.

d. The requirements of this section apply to the entire project including all amendments or modifications that may be issued to modify the contract documents.

3.2 GENERAL INFORMATION

3.2.1 Contractor shall have exclusive use of all spaces for execution of the construction work as defined in the requirements of this RFP; Entrance into and interface with the surrounding facilities shall be coordinated in advance with the Contracting Officer. The project site is within the fenced boundaries of a United States Department of Defense Military Installation.

Access shall require advance notice and security passes at all times. The contractor is responsible for obtaining all security passes.

3.2.2 The superintendent in charge of this work shall personally contact the Contracting Officer’s Representative a minimum of 72 hours before starting work on the contract, before restarting work after a lengthy delay, and prior to moving workers and equipment from one site of work to another.

3.2.3 Coordinate all construction activities with:

a. Contracting Officer’s Representative

b. Base Fire Department

c. Base Security/Police

d. Base Civil Engineer

e. Building Occupants

f. Airfield Manager

3.2.4 Prior to the start of any construction operations whatsoever, a schedule of work or operations in proper sequence shall be submitted by the contractor for approval by the Contracting Officer’s Representative so as to cause a minimum amount of disruption to the normal flow of traffic on streets, pedestrian travel, installation security, and facility operations.

3.2.5 Coordinate all Construction and Use of Premises Activities with the Contracting Officer’s Representative.

3.2.6 Coordinate with Contracting Officer’s Representative the scheduling and routing of work, personnel access and material deliveries for the work.

3.2.7 The Contractor shall coordinate with Installation security regulations and personnel regarding worker and vehicle identification, badging, and permits. See paragraph entitled CONTRACTORS BADGES in MATOC

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 50 05 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

**SAFETY PAYS**

SECTION 01 20 00.00 06

3.2.8.1 High-ranking officers, foreign dignitaries, or DOD employees may approach you. Only the Contracting Officer can make changes to the contract.

3.2.8.2 Bulletin Board.