AMEND 0001_W912PP22R0018.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT I �

CONTRACT ID CODE

I

PA

E OF PAGES

I 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE W912PP 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE I

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ALBUQUERQUE See Item 6

CORPS OF ENGINEERS

4101 JEFFERSON PLAZA, N.E.

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

W912PP22R0018

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10/18/2022

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE I FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

D The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers D is extended. [gj is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning _____ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor D is not [g] is required to sign this document and return ___ 1 __ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Two Phase Design Build MQ-9 Formal Training Unti (FTU) Ops Facility, Holloman Air Force Base (HAFB), Otero County, New

Mexico.

1. This is Amendment No. 0001 to Soliciation No. W912PP22R0018. The following revisions shall be incorporated into the specifications. All other provisions shall remain unchanged.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 1 0A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

Previous edition unusable

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 {REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87109-3435

10/31/2022

W912PP22R0018

AMENDMENT No. 0001

2. SPECIFICATIONS: Delete the following listed pages and substitute the pages attached hereto. On the revised pages, for convenience, changes are emphasized by STRIKETHROUGH for deletions and UNDERLINE for additions from the previous issue. All portions of the revised (or new) pages shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

Delete Page Insert Page

00 22 16 - Supplementary Instructions to Proposers, Pages 18, 22, 28 and 30 of 111

00 22 16 - Supplementary Instructions to Proposers, Pages 18, 22, 28, and 30 of 111

3. DRAWING CHANGES: The following drawings have been revised and the sequence number changed to indicate such revision:

Delete Page Insert Page

NA

////////LAST ITEM////////

2.2.1.3 Phase Two will be evaluated on Phase Two Factors 1 through 5. Technical Factors 1 through 4, are listed in descending order of importance. Factor 1 is the most important factor. Factor 2 is less important than Factor 1. Factor 3 is less important than Factors 1 and 2. Factor 4 is significantly less important than Factors 1-3. Technical Factors 1-4, when combined, are of equal importance to Factor 5, Price.

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Each volume shall be submitted electronically. There are two electronic options: via email or using the DoD SAFE (formerly AMRDEC SAFE) if proposals are too large to send via email. When using SAFE, Offerors are required to request a drop off code from the Contract Specialist (Diana Keeran), diana.m.keeran@usace.army.mil prior to the proposal due date and time. It is recommended that offerors contact the Contract Specialist, prior to the receipt of proposal date and time, to verify that their proposal has been successfully submitted, as the DoD SAFE website does not generate a confirmation email.

3.2 Each paragraph shall be single spaced and be separated by at least one blank line.

A standard, 1210-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 10-point and may be produced in landscape mode. All text shall be legible and easily read by a reasonable person. Sheet size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, however if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 x 17 inches shall be used. Each 11 x 17 page shall count as one (1) single page toward the page count.

3.3 The following volume of material shall be submitted for Phase One:

Location Factor # Description Relative

Importance Page Limitation

Tab A N/A Proposal Cover Sheet, SF1442 Corporate, Partnership, Joint Venture (JV) Certificates, Copy of JV Agreement or Teaming Agreement (If Applicable), Financial Capacity

Not Rated

N/A

Tab B Factor 1 Relevant Contractor Experience Most Important

Factor

Tab C Factor 2 Past Performance Second Most

Important Factor financial statements will be treated as confidential. The Financial Standing Questionnaire provided at the end of this section of the RFP is required to be submitted under this section.

5.2 Tab B: Factor 1 -- Relevant Contractor Experience

5.2.1 Experience in Relevant Projects

5.2.1.1 The offeror shall submit examples of recent construction projects which best illustrate the experience of the construction contractor on relevant projects of similar scope, type, complexity, size and magnitude as defined below. A minimum of three (3) Construction projects but not more than five (5) are to be submitted for the Prime Contractor. A minimum of two (2) projects but not more than three (3) are to be submitted for the design firm. Limit the information for Factor 1 to twenty (20) pages or less. All narratives must contain sufficient detail to demonstrate recency and relevancy.

5.2.1.2 The Government may consider projects more relevant if they consist of all the recency and relevancy criteria listed below. Offerors are encouraged to submit a combination of projects demonstrating as many relevant characteristics as possible. For the purposes of evaluation under this factor, more consideration may be given (i.e. projects may be determined more relevant) to an offeror that demonstrates experience on projects that involve the following:

5.2.1.2.1 Performance by the offeror as the Prime Contractor

5.2.1.2.2 Previous experience between the Contractor and Designer of Record

5.2.1.2.3 Construction Complete Projects, or approximately 70% construction complete, (measured by performance period days) within the last 7 years from the closing date of the RFP. Projects completed more than 7 years before the RFP closing date will not be considered for evaluation purposes. Projects submitted for the design firm must be 100% designed and under construction or construction complete within the last 7 years. Projects for construction firm (Prime Contractor) must be at least 70% construction complete within the last 7 years from the closing date of the RFP.

5.2.1.2.4 Experience with projects that involve Anti-terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) compliant construction.

5.2.1.2.5 Experience with design and construction of Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 compliant secure facilities.

5.2.1.2.6 Experience with constructing large, complex military facilities with multiple secure areas

5.2.1.2.7 Experience with design and construction of facilities utilizing back up power generation and specialized computer flooring systems

5.2.1.2.8 Experience with design or construction on DoD Facilities.

5.2.1.2.9 Projects greater than 50,000 sf and/or over $30,000,000 in construction costs may be considered more relevant.

5.2.1.3 As this is a Best Value trade-off, the more characteristics above that are met for each submitted project under this Factor, the greater the possibility of a higher technical rating.

5.3.12.5 RELEVANCY: The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

Relevancy is not separately rated; however, it will be used to establish what is relevant which shall include items such as similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming.

5.3.12.6 QUALITY ASSESSMENT: This aspect assesses the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

5.3.12.7 Performance Confidence Assessment: Past performance information collected will be reviewed to determine the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information, which will be incorporated into the performance confidence assessment. Based on an offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance the most appropriate performance confidence rating will be assigned.

5.4 Tab C: Factor 3: Key Personnel

5.4.1 This Tab evaluates the offeror’s key personnel. Use the Personnel Resume form provided at the end of this section to provide qualifications for the Key Personnel who will be dedicated to this project. Resume information to be provided shall be limited to no more than four (4) pages per person. Lines may be added to the Personnel Resume form as needed to allow input of additional information. To qualify for Phase Two, the offeror’s design entity is required to have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines and must meet the requirements specified in this section of the RFP. In the event of contract award, these personnel, as identified, must be used on this project except as allowed in Section 00 10 10 and Division 1 – General Requirements of the Phase Two RFP, regarding substitution of key personnel after award.

The Offeror MUST provide a resume for the following Key Personnel:

a. Program/Project Manager for entire Project (Design and Construction)

b. On-Site Project Superintendent

c. Senior Architect (Designer of Record)

d. Senior Civil Engineer (Designer of Record)

e. Senior Structural Engineer (Designer of Record)

f. Senior Electrical Engineer (Designer of Record)

g. Senior Mechanical Engineer (Designer of Record)

h. Senior Fire Protection Engineer (Designer of Record)

All Resumes must include the following information:

The minimum qualification requirements for the On-Site Construction Project Manager, On Site Superintendent, shall be in accordance with the following: The minimum experience requirements for the On-Site Construction Project Manager are at least 10 years construction and construction management experience, with at least 5 years of On-Site Construction Project management experience.

The project on site superintendent must have a minimum of 10 years experience in construction with at least 5 of those years as a superintendent on projects similar in size and complexity. The individual must be familiar with the requirements of EM 385-1-1 and have experience in the areas of hazard identification and safety compliance. The individual must be capable of interpreting a critical path schedule and construction drawings. The qualification requirements for the alternate superintendent are the same as for the project on site superintendent. The Contracting Officer may request proof of the superintendent's qualifications at any point in the project if the performance of the superintendent is in question.

5.5 Tab E: Factor 4: Management Approach

5.5.1 Provide information that describes the offeror’s organization and intended management approach to project management and execution. Limit the information to ten (10) pages. At a minimum, the narrative MUST address the key points listed below.

5.5.1.2 Discuss your management approach to successfully complete this construction project, including:

5.5.1.3 Identify and explain the roles and responsibilities of team members that will perform major or critical aspects of construction phases including lines of authority in decision making. Provide an organization chart identifying on-site and remote positions and staff

5.5.1.4 Describe your approach to managing the design and construction of a new ICD705 compliant Flight Training Unit facility.

5.5.1.5 Describe how you will communicate and coordinate construction issues throughout the construction period. Provide a discussion on: 1) Coordinating working space and site access with the Corps of Engineers, 2) Identifying elements of quality control and project safety, and 3) Discuss approach to RFIs, submittals and Modification process with the Corps of Engineers on this project.

5.5.2 Evaluation Criteria

5.5.2.1 The Government will evaluate strengths, weaknesses, and any deficiencies in the proposal. The Offeror MUST, at a minimum, address the