Am2_W912PL-15-R-0009.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 2

0002 Mar 30, 2015

W912PL

CONTRACTING DIVISION

915 Wilshire Blvd

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-15-R-0009

Feb 13, 2015

FY15 F-35 Weapons School at Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, Nevada

1. Replace SF-1442, Solicitation, Offer and Award. Proposal due date is extended.

See continuation page for remainder of changes.

Christina Chavez

CONTRACTING OFFICER

FY-15 F-35A Weapons School, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0009

SF-30 Continuation page Amendment 2

SF-30 Continuation Sheet – Block 14 - Amendment 2

Amendment issued to revise the following:

1) Replace sections with included sections / pages:

Section # Section Title

SF-1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award (Proposal Due Date extended to April 10, 2015)

00 22 16 Supplemental Instructions to Proposers - clarify Factor 1, Experience; and Factor 3, Technical Approach.

00 70 00 Conditions of Contract - paragraph 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee on page 91 - provided missing amounts of Bid Guarantee.

01 10 10 Specific Engineering and Design Criteria – replace Paragraph 5.14.7 clarifying number of parking spaces.

01 10 12 Design After Award – delete Paragraphs 1.13.4.3.1 and 1.13.4.3.2 on page 3

01 50 00 Temporary Construction Facilities – replace Paragraph 3.6 on page 10 – clarified project safety fence requirements.

2) Other:

Revise Amendment 1 Life Support Area Rm 109, Support Facilities, Compressed Air clarifying compressed air requirements.

FY-15 F-35A Weapons School, Nellis AFB W912PL-15-R-0009 Las Vegas, NV

TABLE OF CONTENTS - 1 Amendment 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SF-1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award Am1 Am2

DIVISION 00 – BIDDING REQUIREMENTS, CONTRACT FORMS AND CONTRACT CONDITIONS

Section Title

00 10 00 Bid Schedule and Certificate of Offeror’s Principal

00 21 16 Instructions to Proposers

00 22 00 Supplementary Instructions

00 22 16 Supplementary Instructions to Proposers Am2

00 45 00 Representations and Certifications

00 70 00 Conditions of the Contract Am2

00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions Am1

00 73 46 Wage Rates

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION and APPENDICES (including DRAWINGS) – dated September 2014, updated January 2015 Am2

(See ).

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

1. SOLICITATION NO.

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.

CODE

6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date)

11. The contractor shall begin performance

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and

b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

is, is not required.

local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.

calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

W912PL-15-R-0009

USACE, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CESPLCT

CONTRACTING DIVISION

915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Design and construct a 1,521 SM administration, instructional and operations facility in support of the F-35 aircraft and to support the Weapons School Complex at Nellis AFB, NV. Facility shall be two stories with secure Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities (SCIF) and Special Access Program Facility (SAP-F) facilities on each floor. Included are mass briefing room, briefing rooms, instruction rooms, simulator rooms and supporting administration rooms. Supporting facilities include fire detection/protection, utilities, landscaping, roads/parking, security and communications support. Facility shall match architecture and elevations of the adjacent Remote Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Weapons school. This project will comply with DoD antiterrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-010-01 and be certified Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.

In accordance with FAR 36/DFARs 236, the estimated construction price range for this project is: Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000

Estimated duration of the project is 600 calendar days.

100% Small Business Set-Aside Competitive Procurement

NOTE: Contractor must be registered with the central contractor registration at https://www.sam.gov in order to receive a Government contract

SEE ITEM 7

OTSE A. ADIKHAI 213-452-3248

02/13/2015

04/10/2015 see **

** Section 00 73 00

Amendment 2

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement by the Government in writing within stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE.

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

26. ADMINISTERED BY

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print)

31c. DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) BACK

31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

CAGE: DUNS:

FY-15 F-35A Weapons School, Nellis AFB

W912PL-15-R-0009

SECTION 00 22 16 - 1

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

(LPTA)

III. LIST OF EVALUATION FACTORS (VOLUME II) AND SPECIFIC

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

IV. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL…………………………………………………………………… 9

V. INITIAL EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II)……………………. 9

VI. EVALUATION OF PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)……………………………………… 10

VII. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS………………………………………... 10

VIII. DISCUSSION PROCESS………………………………………………………………….… 10

IX. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS……………………………………………………………. 11

X. DEBRIEFINGS………………………………………………………………………………… 11

XI. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PREAWARD COSTS……………………………………… 11

SECTION 00 22 16 - 2

SECTION 00 22 16

PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in Part FAR 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

The Government will make award to the offeror submitting the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The Government will first review non-cost technical proposals to determine which are acceptable to the Government.

Responses that the offeror understands, or will comply with the specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications, and general or overly broad responses such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, will be treated as non-responsive and may be rated unacceptable.

The objective of the Government is to award a contract to an offeror who submits a proposal that when evaluated is determined to meet the acceptability levels established in the solicitation for each non-cost evaluation factor. Each non-cost evaluation factor will receive a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The award will be made to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated proposed price.

III. LIST OF EVALUATION FACTORS (VOLUME II) AND SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EVALUATION

CRITERIA

In order to be considered technically acceptable, proposals must meet the following minimum acceptable requirements:

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

This factor will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s successful experience and proposed team’s experience (key subcontractors) on projects of similar type, scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the work that is required under this RFP.

SECTION 00 22 16 - 3

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate experience on similar contracts. Offeror shall identify overall experience with two (2) projects similar in scope, magnitude and complexity as the RFP project that the offeror has successfully completed as the prime contractor within the past five

(5) years. Offeror shall also demonstrate their Designer has this experience by submitting two projects similar in scope and complexity. Offeror should explain how and why Offeror considers this to be similar to the RFP project. Offeror and Offeror’s Designer should also demonstrate at least one project utilizing Design Build. Offeror may demonstrate this overall experience with Teaming Partners, or Joint Ventures. However, there must be a signed agreement in the Proposal that these entities will be part of the Offeror’s project team. Offeror and Offeror’s Desinger shall show at least one project that demonstrates experience in facilities containing large area (approximately 2000 sf) Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities (SCIF) and/or Special Access Program Facility (SAP-F) areas; however, this does not need to be shown on the same project. The offeror should demonstrate experience in sustainable construction and development based on projects that have achieved US Green Building Council’s LEED Silver certification. SCIF/SAP-F and LEED experience can be demonstrated by Offeror, Teaming partner, Joint Venture or Key Subcontractor. Provide a brief description of each project, describe its scope of the work, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR # 2 : PAST PERFORMANCE

Identify all contracts, including Federal, State, local government and private/commercial, for efforts similar to the Government requirement of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity which are either successfully completed within the past five years. Include projects shown in Factor 1 including Designer’s projects. For each project identified, describe the scope of the work, contract price at the time of award, project cost growth during contract performance, and contract price at the time of completion. Include explanation of the reasons for cost growth.

Describe for each project the contract performance period set forth in the contract, time growth during contract performance, if any, and the number of days from the start of the project to acceptance by the owner/government agency. Include explanation for reasons for time growth.

Offerors shall identify recent projects that illustrate LEED certified building construction performance. Identify and describe any warranty issues raised by the owner, and how the problems were resolved; if no warranty issues were raised, offerors should so state. Offerors are encouraged to provide information on problems encountered on the projects and the offeror’s corrective action. Past performance on State, local, and private/ commercial contracts will be evaluated equally with past performance on Federal contracts. Offerors are encouraged to provide information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation. Important Note: See paragraph 5 below

SECTION 00 22 16 - 4

Regarding required consent for release of subcontractor past performance information. For each project, submit the following information in the formats provided at the end of this Section:

Furnish a Performance Assessment Report (PAR) for each referenced contract. If an official written performance evaluation/rating was not received, so indicate. A past performance questionnaire must be sent to the reference if a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the Performance Assessment Report. The Offerors are also encouraged to submit any letters of appreciation or similar correspondence that the Contractor received from the Owner/Customer at the time of contract performance/completion.

However, the Offeror(s) is neither required nor requested to have the Owner/Customer write such a letter for the purpose of this solicitation. The Performance Assessment Report (PAR) will be included in the page count limitation. Formats for the Performance Assessment Report have been provided in Section 00 22 00.

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2 for PAST PERFORMANCE where a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the performance assessment report. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Complete PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offerors are unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offerors should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government point of contract, Mrs. Sandra Oquita via email at sandra.oquita@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will not be included in the page count limitation. Formats for the Past Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

1. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information available for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), included Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owners representatives(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

mailto:sandra.oquita@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 22 16 - 5

2. In conducting the performance risk assessment, the government may use data provided by the Offeror and data obtained from other sources, including automated databases, contacting the owner or contracting officer of the project. The “References’ Past Performance/Quality Questionnaire” (Past Performance Reference Check in Section 00110) is one of the means that may be used by the government to collect past performance information. The Government may contact references other than those identified by the Offeror. The Government may also take into consideration the Offerors performance of contracts with the Agency.

3. The evaluation will take into consideration the Offerors record of conformance to contract specifications and standards of good workmanship; the Offerors safety performance, the Offerors adherence to contract cost, the Offerors adherence to contract schedule, including the administrative aspects of performance; the Offerors history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment to customer satisfaction, and timely award and management of subcontracts;

4. The evaluation will take into account the number and severity of problems, the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record.

5. The performance record of proposed major subcontractors and proposed key personnel might also be considered.

6. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted unless all of the information required for evaluation purposes as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror(s) technical proposal. Offeror(s) that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

7. Release of Subcontractor Past Performance Information. Past performance information pertaining to a proposed subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the Offeror(s) by the Government without the proposed subcontractor’s consent. Therefore, if subcontractor past performance information is being utilized by the Offerors, the Offerors must also submit as part of its technical proposal the subcontractor’s consent to release of its past performance information by the Government to the Offerors. If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the prospective prime contractor can be notified, but no details can be discussed without the proposed subcontractor’s permission.

Standard for Acceptability: Based on the offeror’s performance records, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

SECTION 00 22 16 - 6

FACTOR #3 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to perform and satisfy all design/build construction contract requirements. Responses to this factor must discuss the offeror’s technical understanding of the design/build work requirements and their commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and integrated construction schedule. Technical approach shall demonstrate how the site, architectural, structural, electrical, communications, mechanical, plumbing, security and force protection issues will be addressed. Provide details on how the SCIF and/or SAP-F criteria will be met. Provide detail on HVAC systems and their operation. Provide details on how energy conservation requirements and mandates will be met and how LEED will be met. Discuss phasing and discus any interim completions dates needed. Discuss site boundary constraints and any potential impacts to adjacent facilities. Discuss Design and Construction approaches and controls along with Quality Control methodologies. Provide Offeror’s preliminary proposed floor plans, exterior elevations and site plans if different from those in the RFP.

FACTOR #4 SCHEDULE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to schedule the design and construction of the project. The offeror shall show that the design portion shall be completed to allow time for government reviews. The schedule shall show the remaining time for construction activities.

contract performance to demonstrate the schedule. The offeror shall provide a proposed construction schedule which identifies what it considers the critical construction milestones for the project and provides enough detail to support the proposed duration(s). The Government will evaluate the proposed schedule to determine if the Offeror’s plan assures completion within the specified Performance Period or a shorter duration proposed by the Offeror. The schedule will be evaluated to determine whether it is, complete, reasonable, realistic, and achievable. Offeror may provide a brief description to discuss the offeror’s technical understanding of the work requirements that may not be evident in a milestone schedule, and convey the commitment to accomplish all work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and schedule, the quality of the Offeror’s approach. Also construction methodology, quality control procedures, fundamental commissioning and the workability of the approach as well as the technical feasibility to perform successfully and achieve the required LEED certification level. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical understanding of the design, construction & logistical requirements to accomplish work, quality of the offeror’s schedule approach, workability of the approach as well as the technical feasibility to perform successfully. This schedule shall clearly show how it compares to the number of calendar days and the sequence of construction as stated in

SECTION 00 22 16 - 7

the RFP. The schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which critical milestones are to be achieved. Give special attention to the following tasks:

1. Show the mobilization phase, including events associated with coordinating any submittals and Government review.

2. Include significant infrastructure, utility relocations phasing, long lead procurement items, submittals and government review. Indicate the Offeror’s understanding of the relationship between utility and infrastructure requirements and main facility construction needs.

3. Show the construction phase for each major feature of construction. The schedule shall indicate the Offeror’s understanding of critical path features and building construction.

4. Include long lead material submittals and government review.

5. Show SCIF/SAP-F submittal and approval processes.

6. Include LEED submittals and documentation required to earn the credits identified in the

LEED Checklist shown in Section 01 33 29 Table 1. In addition to submittals, the sschedule should identify specific LEED activities that require significant time and relation to other construction activities, such as preconstruction submittals, indoor air quality testing, commissioning activities, and the LEED certification requirements with the USGBC/GBCI beyond the completion of physical construction.

7. Show proposed completion date of the project and the total proposed project duration in calendar days.

8. Schedules showing durations for Government review of design or project submittals that are shorter than described in the RFP will be considered a deficiency, and will receive an unfavorable rating. Schedules showing total project duration exceeding the Performance Period will receive an Unacceptable rating.

FACTOR #5 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to satisfy all design/build contract requirements within its Corporate Management Structure. The Government will evaluate corporate and construction management structure, experience and qualifications of the key personnel and major subcontractors proposed for the project to include the capability to staff, manage, resource and control successful projects. Personnel will be evaluated on their overall professional experience and on specific experience on projects of similar type, SECTION 00 22 16 - 8 scope, and complexity to the work required under this RFP. Note, for CQC requirements, at the Contracting Officer’s discretion, the CQC Manger need not have the specified degree if they meet the following experience factor: 10 years in the construction industry, 5 of which are as a defined CQC Manager.

contract performance to demonstrate corporate management structure.

1. The offeror shall provide a narrative and visual representation. The Government will evaluate the management structure of illustrated organizational charts, described levels of personnel authority of the individuals involved specifically with this project and the involvement of the construction team, including major subcontractors. The management structure should enhance communication flow within the construction team as well as with the customer.

2. The offeror shall provide résumés for persons directly responsible for carrying out the construction requirements of this contract. The narrative should also address the LEED accredited personnel that will be a part of the construction teams. The Government will evaluate construction personnel directly responsible for carrying out the day-to-day operations of this contract. Professional qualifications and years of relevant experience will both be assessed. Specifically the proposed Project Manager, Construction Site Superintendent, LEED Accredited Professional(s), Safety Manager, and Quality Control (QC) individual(s)’ respective qualifications, responsibilities, and authority levels.

3. The RFP specifications provide specific qualification standards for certain key persons in terms of education, experience and training. Submission of a key person who does not meet at least the minimum threshold qualifications may result in this factor being rated unacceptable.

4. The offeror must explain its present workload, how its resources would be used to meet both its current workload and this project, and the availability of the proposed team to execute the contract. The Government will evaluate present workload and how its resources would be allocated among the competing interests, and the availability of a team to execute the contract

5. The Government will evaluate Offeror's Succession Plan: The offer must explain a succession plan for replacement of key partners or personnel, including project management, site superintendence, quality control, and safety management. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability to perform in the event it needs to replace business partners, key personnel, including positions for project, site superintendence, construction quality control and safety.

IV. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

The offeror’s adherence to prescribed page and formatting limitations prescribed will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted which exceeds the

SECTION 00 22 16 - 9

specified limit will NOT be evaluated. For example, the Government will not evaluate excess information. If four pages are submitted in response to an item with a three page limitation, the information of the fourth page will not be evaluated.

The technical proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the technical specifications. Non-compliance with the technical specifications will be considered a deficiency and an Unacceptable adjectival rating will be assigned.

V. INITIAL EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II)

The offeror’s conformance with the specified format and submission requirements will be considered during the technical evaluation. Failure to comply with the format and/or the submission requirements may be seen as indicative of the type of problems that could be expected during contract performance. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rated as unacceptable. The offeror’s adherence to prescribed page and formatting limitations prescribed will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted which exceeds the specified limit will NOT be evaluated. Offerors may be given a chance to clarify certain aspects of their proposal and to resolve minor or clerical

SECTION 00 22 16 - 10

mistakes. However, offerors are not given an opportunity to respond to any identified weaknesses or deficiencies or revise their proposals.

The technical proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the technical specification.

Technical proposals are given an overall rating of either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”.

The evaluation factors will be rated either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” based upon the standards listed within the RFP. A rating of “Unacceptable” for any evaluation factor will result in an overall rating of “Unacceptable” and the proposal will be ineligible for award

Based upon review of the initial evaluation results, the SSA will decide to either (1) approve award without discussions, or (2) enter into discussions process

VI. EVALUATION OF PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

The LPTA procedure is applied to known, firm requirements where a fair and reasonable price determination is based on adequate price competition. Therefore, price analysis will normally be used to determine the total evaluated price to support the selection of the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror.

The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it is realistic for the work to be performed, reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with the Offeror’s Technical Proposal. All offers with separately priced line items or sub line items will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

VII. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

Offerors may be given a chance to clarify certain aspects of their proposal and to resolve minor or clerical mistakes. However, offerors are not given an opportunity to respond to any identified weaknesses or deficiencies or revise their proposals.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and issue a Contract without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions and receive revised proposals if later determined to be necessary.

VIII. DISCUSSION PROCESS

The primary objective of discussions is to maximize the Government’s ability to obtain best value, based on the requirement and the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation.

As a minimum, during discussions, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) through the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) shall indicate to, or discuss with, each offeror in the competitive range the following: (a) any adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not yet had an opportunity to respond, (b) significant weaknesses, and (c) any deficiencies that have been identified during the evaluation.

SECTION 00 22 16 - 11

This is accomplished through the release of Evaluation Notices (ENs). All ENs shall clearly indicate the type of exchange being conducted (e.g. clarification, communication, etc). Any EN addressing a proposal deficiency or weakness shall clearly indicate that a deficiency/weakness exists. The PCO is encouraged to discuss other aspects of the offeror’s proposal that could in the opinion of the PCO be altered or explained to enhance materially the proposal’s potential for award.

IX. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

At the conclusion of discussions, each offeror still within the competitive range shall be given an opportunity to submit a Final Proposal Revision (FPR) by a common cutoff date and time.

After receipt of the FPR, the SSEB shall complete evaluation of the FPR. The evaluation criteria from the solicitation shall continue to be the basis for evaluation.

X. DEBRIEFINGS

The PCO shall ensure offerors are debriefed, if requested, in accordance with FAR

15.505 and FAR 15.506, as applicable.

XI. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PREAWARD COSTS

The Request for Proposal does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of the initial and/or any subsequent proposals or for any other costs incurred prior to execution of the Contract.

-END OF SECTION 00 22 16-

FY-15 F-35A Weapons School, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0009

00 70 00 – Page 91

(End of clause)

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% percent of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

(End of provision)

52.228-2 ADDITIONAL BOND SECURITY (OCT 1997)

The Contractor shall promptly furnish additional security required to protect the Government and persons supplying labor or materials under this contract if--

(a) Any surety upon any bond, or issuing financial institution for other security, furnished with this contract becomes unacceptable to the Government.

(b) Any surety fails to furnish reports on its financial condition as required by the Government;

(c) The contract price is increased so that the penal sum of any bond becomes inadequate in the opinion of the Contracting Officer; or

(d) An irrevocable letter of credit (ILC) used as security will expire before the end of the period of required security.

If the Contractor does not furnish an acceptable extension or replacement ILC, or other acceptable substitute, at least 30 days before an ILC's scheduled expiration, the Contracting officer has the right to immediately draw on the ILC.

(End of clause)

52.228-5 INSURANCE--WORK ON A GOVERNMENT INSTALLATION (JAN 1997)

(a) The Contractor shall, at its own expense, provide and maintain during the entire performance of this contract, at least the kinds and minimum amounts of insurance required in the Schedule or elsewhere in the contract.

(b) Before commencing work under this contract, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing that the required insurance has been obtained. The policies evidencing required insurance shall contain an endorsement to the effect that any cancellation or any material change adversely affecting the Government's interest shall not be effective (1) for such period as the laws of the State in which this contract is to be performed prescribe, or (2) until

Nellis AFB, NV | SECTION 01 10 10

BLACK & VEATCH | Civil Design 5-9

Curb and Gutter 5.14.4 PCC shall be utilized for all curb and/or gutter work. Curb and gutter shall be provided around all paved areas designated for vehicular traffic except where new pavement matches existing pavement. Curb and gutter shall be used around all landscaped areas, parking lot islands, and between paved drives and sidewalks. Short breaks in the curb may be used in sump locations to allow the surface flow of stormwater runoff. Extruded curbs are not allowed.

Concrete Walkways and Building Entrance Pads 5.14.5 Contractor shall assume walkways are to have a minimum width of 10 feet. This width may be reduced during the Contractor design phase and with approval from the Contracting Officer.

Walkways providing access to a building shall be centered on the doorway served. A PCC building entrance pad shall be provided at all doorways (overhead and personnel) regardless of whether the adjacent surface is paved or unpaved and regardless of the type of adjacent pavement proposed. At a minimum, the building entrance pad shall extend 5 feet from the building and 1 foot beyond the edge of the door opening on either side (5’ x 5’ min). Walkways and entrance pads are to be constructed of PCC with four inch minimum thickness and be constructed of standard non-colored, broom-finished concrete.

Handicapped Access 5.14.6 Handicap parking and van accessible stalls shall be provided in the quantity and dimensions per American Disabilities Act and Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) standards. Handicap ramps shall be provided where required. Handicap access to the facility shall also be designed per ABA standards and an ABA accessible route must be designated.

Parking 5.14.7 Contractor shall design parking according to UFC 3-201-01 Civil Engineering. Contractor shall reference sheet C-101 of Appendix E and develop a parking layout that maximizes the number of stalls in the lot..

Pavement Marking and Signage 5.14.8 Contractor to provide pavement markings, crosswalks marking, traffic control, and information signs as required by the most recent version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Contractor shall submit a pavement marking and signage plan as part of the required design documents.

Building Access Drives 5.14.9 Access drives leading up to the building shall be minimum 14 foot wide and constructed of asphaltic concrete. The drives shall be provided a 6 inch wide, minimum 5 inch thick, flat (not raised), concrete strip along the edges. The edges shall be provided minimum steel for temperature shrinkage reinforcement.

F-35A Weapons School W91238-11-D-0007 Nellis AFB, NV

SECTION 01 10 12 Page 3 successfully resolved and concurred with for construction, each sheet of the drawings and each page of the specifications and Design Analysis shall be stamped "For Construction”, accordingly. See paragraph 2.2 for the number of copies and submittal distribution requirements. “For Construction” electronic drawings and specifications shall be provided on compact disc in the quantity shown in paragraph 2.2. Drawings shall be in both AutoCAD and PDF and the specifications shall be in both MS Word and PDF.

1.12.1. Once the “For Construction” is concurred with, any changes to the plans and specifications shall be submitted as a deviation in accordance with the DB Contractor prepared Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES.

1.13. Design and Construction Schedule

1.13.1. As described by Paragraph 1.13.3 this project will follow a sequential schedule method (construction starts after design is complete) for design-build. All review comments for a particular portion of the work must be appropriately addressed and applicable construction techniques for unusual construction conditions must be properly defined and accepted.

Therefore, the contractor may begin construction on portions of the work for which the Government has reviewed the final design submission and the contractor has satisfactorily addressed all Government review questions/concerns and the Contracting Officer provides authorization to proceed. If this portion of the work is sensitive to weather (heat, cold, rain, snow, or any other weather situation) or any other situation precluding normal construction techniques, the contractor shall also submit to the Contracting Officer a plan to conduct this work (referencing and following industry standards or more stringent government standards) for compliance review.

1.13.2. Every feature of the project must be fully designed prior to the start of the construction process for that feature. The contractor shall minimize the number of design submittals to no more than two (correction submittals not counted) unless approved by the Contracting Officer.

1.13.3. The following design grouping table describes the areas of design to be submitted. The contractor shall designate how it will package the design consistent with its overall plan for permitting and construction of the project. Note that LEED certification related submittals and meetings are required throughout the entire design and construction period of performance. Refer to Section 01 10 10, Part 4.5 for details.

Where: 60% = Preliminary Design Submittal (60%) in accordance with paragraph 1.16.3. 100% = Final Design Submittal (100%) in accordance with paragraph 1.16.4. CF = Corrected Final / sealed & signed “For Construction” documents in accordance with paragraph 1.16.5

Major Areas in Submittal / Submittal No. 1 2 3 Site Work, Utilities, Foundations, Structural Framing, Architectural, Interiors, Mechanical, Fire Protection & Alarm, Electrical, Communications

60% 100% CF

1.13.4. The contractor shall have the freedom to establish the design and construction schedule within the Construction Performance Period of service at the approval of the Contracting Officer.

1.13.4.1. The contractor shall include on the schedule a 21 calendar day period for the government to conduct a compliance review for each submittal. A compliance review conference shall follow the compliance review period. The contractor shall include on the schedule a 14 calendar day period for the government to conduct a back check review of the Corrected Final Design submittal.

1.13.4.2. The contractor shall include on the schedule a 3 calendar day period (1 day for travel 2 for meeting) for a compliance review conference related to each submittal; no meeting is required for back check submittals. These conferences shall not be scheduled during a weekend or holiday or on a day of the week that is adjacent to a day of a weekend or holiday.

This typically will leave Tuesdays, Wednesdays, or Thursdays for these conferences.

1.13.4.3. Special Scheduling Requirements:

1.13.4.3.1. The existing sewer line that is under the facility footprint shall be relocated per Drawing C-102. The relocated sewer line shall be constructed, tested and in full operation prior to demolition of the segment to be removed.

Coordinate the switch-over schedule with the Contracting Officer for approval no less than 60-days prior to the scheduled switch-over.

1.13.4.3.2. The existing domestic water line that is under the facility footprint shall be relocated per Drawing C-102.

Amenndment 2 l1cohjrl Cross-Out l1cohjrl Cross-Out

SECTION 01 10 12 Page 4

The relocated domestic water line and all affected lateral lines shall be constructed, tested and in full operation prior to demolition of the segment to be removed. Disruption of domestic water service to all adjacent facilities shall be minimized, and fire protection service operability must be maintained at all times. Coordinate the switch-over schedule with the Contracting Officer for approval no less than 60-days prior to the scheduled switch-over.

1.13.4.3.3. The existing overhead power distribution line that is adjacent to the facility footprint that provides power to building 118 and 122 and site lighting is being removed (see drawing CD100) and routed underground as part of a new feed to the new F-35A building per Drawing C-121. The new electric duct bank system, conductors, and re-located building transformers shall be constructed, installed, tested and in full operation, to the fullest extent possible prior to demolition of the segment to be removed and before start of facility construction. Disruption of power supply to all adjacent occupied and operating facilities shall be minimized and coordinated with other power outages and with the Contracting Officer. Coordinate the switch-over schedule with the Contracting Officer for approval no less than 60-days prior to the scheduled switch-over. Contractor shall be responcible for temporary power for outages that extend beyond.

1.13.4.3.4. The existing overhead power distribution line that runs parallel to Holloman Rd.