Am2_W912PL-15-R-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 3

0002 Apr 30, 2015

W912PL

Corps of Engineers - Los Angeles District Contracting Division, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suit 930

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-15-R-0003

Mar 20, 2015

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV. W912PL-15-R-0003.

See attached Continuation Pages for description of amendment.

Sandra Oquita

CONTRACTING OFFICER

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

SF-30 Continuation page - 1 Amendment 2

Continuation from Block 14 of SF-30

This amendment is issued to:

1) 00 10 00 - CLIN SCHEDULE

Revise Clin Schedule to include Asbestos testing in Bldg 258 exterior walls and to abate assumed ACM present in vermiculite insulation contained in the exterior walls.

(CLIN 0007 & 0008)

2) 01 22 00 SUPPLEMENTRY INSTRUCTIONS

Revised paragraph 1.1.4.

3) STATEMENT OF WORK

a) Paragraph 5.0 - Added new requirement to test for ACBM in exterior walls and assume that is present for bidding purposes.

4) 01 10 10 SPECIFIC TECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CRITERIA

a) Paragraph 2.3 - Deleted text and added new text.

b) Paragraph 2.10.1 - Added new text.

c) Revise Paragraph 4.14.

d) Paragraph 4.8 - Added new requirement to test for ACBM in exterior walls and assume that is present for bidding purposes.

e) Paragraph 4.14.91 - Deleted text and added new text.

f) Paragraph 4.78.10.1- Revised text.

g) Paragraph 6.5.4-Required Contractor to remove FFE as directed by COR.

h) Paragraph 6.9.3 - Deleted text and added new text.

i) Paragraph 6.11.10 - Added new text.

j) Paragraph 6.11.13 - Deleted text and added new text.

k) Paragraph 6.12.1 - Deleted text and added new text.

l) Paragraph 6.13.7.1 - Deleted text and added new text.

m) Paragraph 12.2.6.1 - Deleted text and added new text.

n) Paragraph 12.2.24.2 - Added new text.

o) Paragraph 12.2.24.3.3 - Deleted text and added new text.

p) Paragraph 13.1.8 - Deleted text and added new text.

q) Paragraph 13.1.3.10 Revised text.

r) Paragraph 14.2.1- Added new text.

s) Paragraph 14.2.1.4 - Added new text.

t) Paragraph 14.2.3 - Deleted text and added new text.

u) Paragraph 14.2.7.2 - Deleted text and added new text.

v) Paragraph 14.3 - Deleted text and added new text.

w) Paragraph 14.4 - Deleted text and added new text.

x) Paragraph 15.2.1.5 - Added new text.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

SF-30 Continuation page - 2 Amendment 2

y) Paragraph 15.3.11 - Added new text.

z) Paragraph 15.3.12 - Added new text.

aa) Paragraph 15.4.18 - Deleted text and added new text.

bb) Paragraph 15.4.19 - Added new text.

cc) Paragraph 15.4.27 - Added new paragraph.

dd) Paragraph 15.4.28 - Added new paragraph.

ee) Paragraph 16.5 - Added new text.

ff) Paragraph 16.8 - Deleted text and added new text.

gg) Paragraph 16.10 - Deleted text and added new text.

hh) Paragraph 18.3 - Added new text.

5) 01 10 11 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN CRITERA ROOM BY ROOM REQUIREMENTS

a) Paragraph 1.6.1 - Deleted text and added new text.

b) Paragraph 4.39.9.2 - Deleted the whole paragraph.

c) Paragraph 4.65.10.1 - Deleted the whole paragraph.

6) Drawing Sheet C-141 - SITE PLAN

a) Pavement scope and extents change.

7) APPENDIX EE Building Code Analysis

a) Replace Title Page APPENDIX EE with new page containing Building Code Methodology

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003 AMEND 2

SECTION 00 10 00 – CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PLANT, LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, ETC.

NECESSARY TO PERFORM ALL WORK IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS

AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE CONTRACT TO INCLUDE ALL

ATTACHMENTS THERETO.

Item Estimated Unit No. Description Quantity Unit Price Amount

BASE BID

0001 Design 1 Job **** $

0002 Demolition Existing Buildings 1 Job **** $

0003 Primary Building Complex complete to 5' outside the building

1 Job **** $

0004 Site Work and Utilities outside the 5' building line

1 Job **** $

Renovate Bldg 447/448 for Temp Occupancy

Job

0006 LEED 1 Job **** $

Test Exterior Walls Bldg 258 for Hazardeous Material

Job

0008 Abate ACBM Contaminated 1 Job **** $ ___________ Vermiculite Insulation in Exterior Walls Bldg 258

TOTAL BASE BID ITEMS 0001 - 0008 $

Section 00 10 00-Page 1

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 1 Amendment 2

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS: …………..…………………………

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: ..……………………………………………………...2

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: ………………………………………………………………………….2

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT: ………………………………………………………………………………….3

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE: ……………………………………………………………………………3

1.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME ): …………………………..3

1.6. CONTENT FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II): …………………………………. 3

1.7. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II): ……………… 4

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET: …………………………………………………………………………7

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 2 Amendment 2

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1.1.1. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors in Section 00 22 16.

1.1.2. Each Offeror must submit a Price Proposal, Volume I, and a Technical Proposal Volume II as separate distinct volumes. The Price Proposal, and Technical Proposal, must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

1.1.3. All information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. No proposed price information should be included in the response to the technical evaluation factors.

1.1.4. All written portions: Proposal is limited to (35) Thirty-five single sided pages for Factors 1 through 5. Pages submitted past this limit will not be evaluated. The Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) and up to 10 pages of Resumes (single sided) will not be included in the above page count.

Performance Assessment Reports (PAR) will be included in the page count, however, attachments such as any letters of appreciation or similar correspondence will not count against the page limitation. An additional 10 pages will be added for Factor 6, Small Business Participation Plan and an additional 15 pages for the Subcontracting Plan, which is required to be submitted by Large Business with the proposal.

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1.2.1. All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” size sheets (e.g., fold-outs) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

1.2.2. All drawing sheets: 22” x 34” (1/2 size 11”x17”), 24" x 36" or 30" x 42" format. Full or half- size sets are acceptable, but must include a minimum of one (1) full-size set; half-size sets must be readable.

1.2.3. Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

1.2.4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

1.2.5. Offerors must provide one (1) CD Rom disk of all the following Design Technical Criteria (AutoCAD 2000 & MS WORD 2000) and Offerors Performance Capability with technical proposal. Offerors will not be required to submit electronic copies of catalog cuts.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 3 Amendment 2

TAB #1 SF 1442

TAB #2

The Completed Pricing Schedule with the Offeror’s proposed contract line item prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for the Base Bid Items. Do not round off to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission.

TAB #3 A Bid Guarantee (e.g., Standard Form 24, “Bid Bond”) TAB #4 Representations & Certifications TAB #5 Teaming Agreement or Irrevocable Subcontractor Offer (if applicable) TAB #6 Subcontracting Plan (if required)

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT:

1.3.1. Offeror(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE:

1.4.1. Offers shall be received by the Los Angeles District COE no later than the time and date specified as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

1.5. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

1.5.1. Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original only

1.5.2. Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs: The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

1.6. CONTENT FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.6.1. TAB 1 – TECHNICAL APPROACH (VOLUME II):

Factor 1: Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.2. TAB 2 – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS (VOLUME

II):

Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.3 TAB 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT PROJECTS (VOLUME II)

1.6.4. TAB 4 – MANAGEMENT PLAN (VOLUME II)

1.6.5. TAB 5 –PROPOSED SCHEDULE (VOLUME II)

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 4 Amendment 2

1.6.6 TAB 6 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

Submission Requirements:

All offerors (both large and small businesses) will be evaluated on the extent of participation of small business concerns in performance of this contact opportunity.

The offeror’s Small Business Participation Plan, submitted in the Technical Proposal, must meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business participation goal of 20% based on the total contract value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). The work to be performed directly by a small business prime offeror will also be evaluated as Small Business participation.

All offerors must complete and submit the Small Business Participation Plan form.

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Participation Plan to be evaluated under Small Business Participation Plan Factor. The Offeror shall articulate how the Offeror intends to meet the small business objectives described in the Small Business Participation Plan Factor.

1.6.7 DRAWINGS –

Must be submitted in accordance with Section 00120 and are included in the requirements under Factor 4, Technical Approach. All drawings shall be either full size (22" x 34") or half size (11" x 17") as described in Section 01012.

1.7. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.7.1. Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal: Submit the original and 4 additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format.

1.7.1.1. Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart. The main tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is thirty-five (35) pages.

An additional 10 pages will be added for Factor 6, Small Business Participation Plan and an additional 15 pages for the Subcontracting Plan, which is required to be submitted by Large Business with the proposal.

1.7.1.2. Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Offeror(s) must submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the following volumes and tabs:

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 5 Amendment 2

VOLUME TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VOLUME II

TAB #1

TECHNICAL APPROACH

(Factor 1 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #2

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

(Factor 2 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #3 PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT CONTRACTS

(Factor 3 in Section 00 22 16) VOLUME II TAB #4 MANAGEMENT PLAN (Factor 4 in Section 00 22 16)

VOLUME II

TAB #5 PROPOSED SCHEDULE (Factor 5 in Section 00 22 16)

VOLUME II

TAB #6 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (Factor 6 in Section 00

22 16)

Instructions regarding responses to the evaluation factors are detailed in Section 00120, entitled, “Proposed Evaluation and Contract Award”

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 6 Amendment 2

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Offeror)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number: Task Order (TO) Number if Applicable:

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost Reimbursement Hybrid (explain)

Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active Complete Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. LEED Certification Building Construction:

10. Warranty or other problems encountered and how resolved:

11. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable): Check one of the following blocks:

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A performance questionnaire has been sent to the reference(s) listed in Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 7 Amendment 2

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

1.8.1. Format for the Proposal Cover Sheet: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c)(i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 22 00.

The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-15-R-0003

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 8 Amendment 2

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL

CONTENTS

NUMBER REQUIRED

VOLUME I

PRICE PROPOSAL/

PRO-FORMA

REQUIREMENTS

--PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

-- SF 1442 AND AMENDMENTS

--PRICING SCHEDULE

--OFFER GUARANTEE (“BID BOND”)

--REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

1 ORIGINAL ONLY

TECHNICAL

APPROACH,

METHODS

AND

PROCEDUR

ES

- NARRATIVES

ORIGINAL + 4 SETS

CONSTRUCTION

EXPERIENCE ON

SIMILAR

CONTRACTS

PROJECTS OF SIMILAR TYPES, SCOPES

AND COMPLEXITY

-RECENT RELEVANT TEAMING

EXPERIENCES

VOLUME II PAST

PERFORMANCE ON

RECENT RELEVANT

CONTRACTS

-PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE

CHECK

-RELEVANT PROJECT SUMMARY

-RECENT RELEVANT PROJECT

INFORMATION

MANAGEMENT

PLAN

- PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

- CONSTRUCTION KEY PERSONNEL’S

RESUME

- ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

PROPOSAL

SCHEDULE

-PROJECT SCHEDULE NARRATIVE

-PROPOSED SCHEDULE

DRAWINGS

-CIVIL SITE PLAN,

-OVERALL FLOOR PLAN,

-EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 9 Amendment 2

Small Business Participation Plan (Form)

(1) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime or { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Businesses { } Woman-Owned Small Business { } HUB Zone Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business { } HBCU/MIs

(2) Submit the total combined percentage (must equal 100%) of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Sub-contractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Percentage of Total Contract Dollars/Price

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) % Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) %

(3) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of small business.

The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Gentleman Concierge (HubZone) and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB

2%; VOSB 2%);.

SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantaged Businesses % HUB Zone Small Business % Woman Owned Small Business % Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB _% Veteran Owned Small Business % HBCU/MIs _%

(4) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small:

Small Disadvantaged Businesses:

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 10 Amendment 2

Women-Owned Small:

HUB Zone Small:

Veteran Owned Small:

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small:

HBCU/MI:

(5) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either -- written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

(6) Large Business Subcontracting Past Performance: Describe the extent to which you attained applicable goals for contracts that required you to submit a Subcontracting Plan. You may include copies of up to three ISRs (Individual Subcontracting Reports) to validate your past performance. You may also submit an explanation of your efforts, where you failed to meet goals.

Additional Important Note for Large Businesses only.

Small Business Sub-Contracting Plans (FAR 52.219-9)

Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan, large business offerors must also submit a Subcontracting Plan (Individual Contract Plan) as required by FAR 52.219-9. Large businesses will not be eligible for award if they fail to submit an acceptable Subcontracting Plan.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 11 Amendment 2

SAMPLE COVER LETTER

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance. you may provide the requested information by email to Sandy Oquita Sandra.Oquita@usace.army.mil. or call at (213) 452-3249.

• The Government is requesting receipt of this information by 2:00 p.m. on 16 April 2015.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance.

Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Ms. Sandy Oquita by telephone

(213) 452-3249.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment mailto:Sandra.Oquita@usace.army.mil.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 12 Amendment 2

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address:DUNs Number: Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explaind ifferences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE

WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 13 Amendment 2

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST

REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 14 Amendment 2

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 15 Amendment 2

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to

Government changes

F-35 Maintenance Hangar (4 Bay) & AMU, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-15-R-0003

00 22 00 -Page 16 Amendment 2

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

(please attach additional pages if necessary):

F-35A MAINTENANCE HANGAR/AMU 1968

BLDG 257

1 Amendment 0002

1.0 STATEMENT OF WORK:

1.1 Objective of this Contract: Demolish existing Bldg 258 and design and construct a new F-35A

Maintenance Hangar and Aircraft Maintenance Unit, along with a new F-15 Strike Aircraft Maintenance Unit, on Nellis AFB, as described in this document (specifically Section 01 10 10), in accordance with the criteria contained herein by using industry standard materials and efficient practices, and to meet the operational requirements of the Air Force. The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, material, tools and Design-Build services to perform the design and construct the complete, operational facility and site features along with demolition of the existing site facilities of this project titled FY15 F-35A Maintenance Hangar/AMU; Building 257.

2.0 BACKGROUND FOR THE PROJECT:

2.1 Base Description: The "Home of the Fighter Pilot," Nellis Air Force Base is home to the U.S. Air

Force Warfare Center, the largest and most demanding advanced air combat training mission in the world. Nellis provides training for composite strike forces which include every type of aircraft in the Air Force inventory. Training is conducted in conjunction with air and ground units of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and air forces from our allied nations. The crews train at Nellis AFB in order to become the best combat aviators in the world.

2.2 Background: Nellis AFB is the designated bed down location for Force Development and Evaluation, and the USAF Weapon School for the F-35A weapon system. A 4-bay maintenance hangar with an attached Aircraft Maintenance Unit, adequately sized and configured, is required to support the permanent bed down of 24 Primary Training Aircraft beginning FY14/2. The F-35A Hangar/AMU is required to support flight line maintenance for both test and weapon school aircraft and fall under the 57th Maintenance Group. The F-35A is designed with state of the art technology and composite materials to meet stealth mission requirements. Dedicated maintenance facilities are required to maintain these unique, one of a kind systems. Because the Nellis flight line and ramp is at capacity, this new facility must be sited over the existing F-15 Strike, forcing their relocation.

3.0 SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS:

3.1 Scope: This project will construct an approximately 65,000 square foot F-35A Hangar and AMU and F-15 Strike AMU at Nellis Air Force Base.

3.2 Proposed Siting: The proposed F-15/F-35A Maintenance Hangar/Aircraft Maintenance Unit (AMU) will be located where Building 258 is currently located; bounded by Tyndall Avenue to the northwest, Building 262 to the northeast, the Flight line to the southeast, and Building 256 to the southwest.

3.3 Building Construction: Maintenance Hangar walls will consist of braced structural steel framing and sub-framing members faced with insulated metal wall panels providing a minimum rating of R-19. A concrete masonry wainscot will be applied at the exterior wall face. A 1-Hour fire-rated non-bearing masonry separation wall is required between the Hangar and other occupied areas in accordance with ETL 02-15. Exterior non-bearing CMU walls shall be designed per requirements of UFC 4-010-01. The AMU Squadron Operations Facility will be a two story steel framed structure located adjacent to the Maintenance Hangar and the Support High-Bay. The AMU facility will be enclosed with non-bearing CMU walls, and separated from other structures with seismic joints. All CMU walls will be non-bearing, and designed per requirements of UFC 4-

010-01. The Support Bay and Propulsion Maintenance Shop comprise a single-story high-bay structure adjacent to both the AMU Squadron Operations Facility and Maintenance Hangar. The construction type is similar to the AMU facility and consists of a steel structure enclosed by insulated metal wall panels and non-bearing CMU walls.

4.0 OPTIONAL BID ITEMS:

4.1 None, see Bid Schedule.

5.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL TESTING AND DISPOSAL

5.1 It is assumed that there is vermiculite that has been contaminated with asbestos in insulation in the existing building 258 exterior walls. Contractor shall bid accordingly. After award, Contractor shall test for this material. If asbestos is not present, a credit modification shall be issued to delete this work.

01 10 10 - 1 Amendment 0002

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 01 10 10

SPECIFIC TECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CRITERIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SCOPE

2. SUMMARY DESCRIPTIONS

3. DESCRIPTION OF CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONS

4. DESIGN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

5. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

6. CIVIL DESIGN

7. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

8. GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

9. STRUCTURAL DESIGN

10. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

11 LIFE SAFETY

12. MECHANICAL DESIGN

13. PLUMBING DESIGN

14. FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN

15. ELECTRICAL DESIGN

16. FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS

17. ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEMS

18. TELECOMMUNICATIONS DESIGN

01 10 10 - 2 Amendment 0002

1. SCOPE

1.1 Design and construct the renovation of the NAFB F-35A HANGAR AND AMU, F- 15 STRIKE AMU at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, in accordance with the criteria contained herein and using industry standard materials and efficient practices. The objective of this contract is to design and construct the required facility as described in this document and Section 01 10 11, Room-by-Room Requirements, and to meet the operational requirements of the Air Force. The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and material to perform the design and construct the complete, operational facility. The Contractor is responsible for visiting the site during a prescheduled site visit of all bidders prior to submitting his proposal

1.2 The Contractor shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications and other documents or publications upon which construction is based. The design of architectural, interior design, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, landscape and other engineering features of the work shall be accomplished, reviewed, approved and sealed by engineers, architects and interior designers who are licensed professionals with a minimum of six years experience to practice in their respective professional field in a state or possession of the United States. The structural interior design (SID) shall be designed/supervised by a registered or certified (as appropriate for the state) interior designer who is NCIDQ certified.

The Contractor’s team shall include a LEED accredited professional (LEED AP).

The LEED AP shall have the responsibility to coordinate the design and construction efforts in achieving a USGBC LEED Silver rating, using LEED for New Construction version 3. A Registered Roofing Consultant or a Professional Engineer or Registered Architect who deals primarily with roofing design shall also be included as part of the design team. The Government will identify a Commissioning Agent to be involved in the design and construction of the facility.

1.3 The design and construction of this project shall conform to the “Installation Development and Design (ID2) Handbook for Nellis and Creech Air Force Bases, Nevada” dated August 2011 (see Appendix B of this RFP) and the requirements contained in this solicitation. Features differing from the ID2 and the requirements in this RFP may be allowed if said changes otherwise provide the same level of function, quality and performance established in Solicitation. The Government will be the sole authority in determining if changes are acceptable.

All applicable design goals stated in the ID2 Handbook and as modified by the Nellis Requirements/Guidance document (see Appendix C of this RFP) shall be incorporated into project. Contractor shall comply with and implement all applicable technical constraints, considerations, and policies stated in the ID2 Handbook unless an alternate approach is stated in project scope of work or approved by Contracting Officer.

1.4 The Contractor is responsible and liable for the complete design and shall not assume that the provided design criteria and drawings in this solicitation will alleviate him from performing any additional design as required to produce a complete set of construction documents. The following provisions shall be maintained in the Contractor’s design:

01 10 10 - 3 Amendment 0002

1.4.1 Provision 1: Gross Square Feet: The Contractor’s design shall provide at least the same square foot area overall, and on a room by room basis as shown in the Government’s conceptual design.

1.4.2 Provision 2: Equivalent Functional Arrangement: The Contractor’s design shall provide equivalent functional arrangement of rooms and spaces as shown in the Government’s conceptual design.

1.4.3 Provision 3: Overall Site Limits: The Contractor’s design shall be limited to the general extents of the Project site shown in the Government’s conceptual design.

1.4.4 Provision 4: Gross Glazing Area: The Contractor’s design shall provide at a minimum, the same overall glazing area as shown in the Government’s conceptual design. Glazing area may be increased, but not decreased from that indicated in the Government’s conceptual design.

1.4.5 Provision 5: Sustainable Design: The Contractor’s design is required to meet the sustainable design guidelines required by this RFP. If the Contractor determines that alternate assemblies or functional arrangements are better suited for the achievement of sustainable design goals, the Contractor may propose those changes. Changes can only be incorporated under the review and approval of the Government.

1.5 The Government’s conceptual site drawings indicate the general location of the facility, its approximate maximum size, and other system parameters that represent functional relationships of the project program. The Contractor’s design shall maintain functional relationships regardless of individual design decisions/changes made.

1.6 The Government’s conceptual facility and site design provided in the RFP documents illustrates intent and functional relationships and does not indicate all necessary construction requirements or components. The written RFP describes associated technical, performance and systems requirements. The Contractor is responsible for the complete Project design, shall retain all responsibilities, and be recognized as the Designer of Record.

01 10 10 - 4 Amendment 0002

2. SUMMARY DESCRIPTIONS

2.1 This project will construct an approximately 65,000 square foot F35A Hangar and AMU and F15 Strike AMU at Nellis Air Force Base. The project shall be designed within the criteria prescribed in UFC 1-200-01, UFC 3-600-01, and operations and maintenance manuals. See paragraph 4.14 for a list of applicable codes and criteria.

2.2 This project is intended to construct an F-35A Maintenance Hangar/AMU and F- 15 Strike AMU using economical design and construction methods to accommodate the mission of the facility. The facility will be compatible with applicable DoD, Air Force and Base Design Standards. In addition, local materials and construction techniques shall be used where cost-effective, preferably, reinforced concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel frame, standing seam metal roof, fire detection/protection, utilities, landscaping, roads, parking, hangar apron, access roads and parking pavements, lighting and markings, high expansion fire protection system, communication support, demolition of one facility (1,850 SM), temporary facilities during construction and all other necessary support. This project will comply with antiterrorism / force protection requirements.

2.3 The F-35A Hangar will be configured and constructed as a standard aircraft maintenance unit. Aircraft clearances will be in accordance with AF Handbook 32-1084, Table 7.2 and the F-35 Lightning II Facilities Requirements Document (FRD), as developed by Lockheed Martin Corporation. Hangar clear height will be based on the F-15 airframe. The Hangar will be configured into two separated maintenance bays, each capable of housing two F-35A aircraft (or one F-15, each bay). The west bay will include a 7 ton bridge crane. Per the FRD, the minimum bridge crane hook height for F-35A support operations is 18 feet above finished floor elevation. Final installation elevations of the crane shall consider minimum clearances required around the noted aircraft envelopes. The hangar bay will be provided with a high expansion foam fire protection system. An overhead service door with fire curtain will be installed in the separation wall to facilitate materials transfer between the hangar bays. Inverters will be located in the Electrical room adjacent to the hangar. A trench drain will be installed just inside the sliding doors. Hangar doors will be horizontal sliding insulated steel panel type, floor supported. The Hangar floor slab will be level to facilitate aircraft maintenance operations. Elevation of the Hangar floor will be 18 inches below the floor elevation of the AMU administrative, supply and support areas per Base directive.

2.4 The F-35A Aircraft Maintenance Unit (AMU) squadron operations area will consist of administrative offices, restrooms and showers, a break/ready room with kitchenette, debriefing rooms, conference room, and a supply area with security vault, a support area and a propulsion maintenance shop.

2.5 Administrative offices shall be provided for F-35A AMU personnel and support contractors in compliance with facility user activity and space requirements. A debriefing office, the secured communications room will be constructed as Special Access Program Facilities (SAPF) complying with JAFAN 6/9 requirements. SAPF walls and penetrations shall provide a minimum sound

01 10 10 - 5 Amendment 0002 attenuation rating of STC-50. The break room will include 12 workstations with seating along the walls for use as temporary turn-around offices, and have space for wall-mounted TVs. The conference room shall be unclassified and provide space for a minimum of 25 people, have a large TV monitor for morning meetings, 1 quad, and a conference phone. The break room shall also include a kitchen/convenience area with cabinets, refrigerator (GFGI), sink, and garbage disposal.

2.6 A supply area and secured storage vault shall be located adjacent to the Maintenance Hangar and provide space for storing and issuing tools and materials in support of AMU operations. The supply area will include a customer service counter with lockable roll-up counter door. The vault will be constructed to requirements of JAFAN 6/9 based on classification of materials being stored, and have an X09 lockset. The supply area and vault will be single-story, with no occupants located above it. Cypher locks will be provided in this area.

2.7 The support area will be a high-bay providing space for shipping, receiving, and material inspection activities. Material access from the exterior will be through an overhead service door sized in accordance with the F-35 Lightning II FRD as developed by Lockheed Martin Corporation. The support area will include a customer service counter with lockable roll-up counter door and a shipping/receiving office equipped with data and network connections. Two compressed air connections are required, and this areas needs to be adjacent to the Battery Maintenance room, which requires two charging stations, a dedicated line, and a 30-amp isolated circuit.

2.8 The propulsion maintenance shop will be a single story high-bay area designed to support minor F-35A engine maintenance…