Am1.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 3

0001 13 April 2010

W912PL

CONTRACTING DIVISION

P.O. BOX 532711

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-09-R-0053

26 March 2010

Replace page 00110-4 of Section 00110 and 00120-4 of Section 00120.

The first sentence of the Tab # 1 Factor #1 description shall read: "Offeror shall identify a minimum of two or more (2) Design Build and one or more (1) Design-Bid-Build projects of a similar scope, dollar minimum magnitude of $5,000,000.00 and complexity it has successfully completed within the past five years."

00110-4 Amendment 0001

TAB #1

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR DESIGN BUILD

AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD CONTRACTS, SPECIFICALLY

CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO

OFFICE BUILDINGS, HANGERS, FACILITIES,

UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS, FLIGHT SIMULATORS,

WING HEADQUARTERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION

SUBFACTOR NO. 1a: Design and Construction Processes SUBFACTOR NO. 1b: Construction Safety Methods

TAB #2 FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND

PROCEDURES

TAB #3

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE ON SIMILAR

CONTRACTS, SPECIFICALLY CONSTRUCTION

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OFFICE BUILDINGS,

HANGERS, FACILITIES, UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS,

FLIGHT SIMULATORS, WING HEADQUARTERS, AND

OTHER CONSTRUCTION

TAB #4

FACTOR 4: CORPORATE/MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

SUBFACTOR NO. 4a: Capability to Manage & Control Project SUBFACTOR NO. 4b: Key Personnel SUBFACTOR NO. 4c: Offeror’s Workload SUBFACTOR NO. 4d: Offeror’s succession plan

(a) Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Submit detailed response to the evaluation factors under each of the tabs as follows:

TAB #1 FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR DESIGN BUILD AND DESIGN-BID-

BUILD CONTRACTS, SPECIFICALLY CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO OFFICE BUILDINGS, HANGERS, FACILITIES, UNMANNED AERIAL

SYSTEMS, FLIGHT SIMULATORS, WING HEADQUARTERS, AND OTHER

CONSTRUCTION

Offeror shall identify a minimum of two or more (2) Design Build and one or more (1) Design- Bid-Build projects of a similar scope, dollar minimum magnitude of $5,000,000.00 and complexity it has successfully completed within the past five years. Provide a description of the project, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion, the completion date of the award and the name, address and telephone number of the client. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Offeror may include projects completed by predecessor companies.

SUB-FACTOR NO. 1a, DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES. This sub-factor will be evaluated on the basis of demonstrated knowledge and experience performing Design Build and Design-Bid-Build projects requiring design and construction requirements.

00120-4 Amendment 0001 other impacts on the evaluation.

Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

(b) The adjectival rating, of the Technical Proposal may be negatively affected if the specified information is not provided in the specified location in accordance with the submission instructions in Section 00 01 10.

(c) The adjectival rating of the Technical Proposal may be negatively affected if the proposals are generic, vague, or lacking in detail.

(d) The degree of risk to the Government inherent in the offerors technical proposal will be a consideration under this factor.

(e) The Government may consider a proposal based on a deficient offer if the Government elects to enter into discussions with offerors and all deficiencies are remedied in revised proposals.

I. LIST OF EVALUATION FACTORS, SUB-FACTORS AND SPECIFIC TECHNICAL

EVALUATION CRITERIA

In order to be considered technically acceptable, technical proposals must meet the following minimum requirements:

TAB #1 FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR DESIGN BUILD AND DESIGN-BID-

BUILD CONTRACTS, SPECIFICALLY CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO OFFICE BUILDINGS, HANGERS, FACILITIES, UNMANNED AERIAL

SYSTEMS, FLIGHT SIMULATORS, WING HEADQUARTERS, AND OTHER

CONSTRUCTION

Offeror shall identify a minimum of two (2) or more Design Build and one or more (1) Design- Bid-Build projects of a similar scope, dollar minimum magnitude of $5,000,000.00 and complexity it has successfully completed within the past five years. Provide a description of the project, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion, the completion date of the award and the name, address and telephone number of the client. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Offeror may include projects completed by predecessor companies.

SUB-FACTOR NO. 1a, DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES. This sub-factor will be evaluated on the basis of demonstrated knowledge and experience performing Design Build and Design-Bid-Build projects requiring design and construction requirements.

SUB-FACTOR NO. 1b, CONSTRUCTION SAFETY METHODS. This sub-factor will be evaluated on the basis of demonstrated successful performance of Design Build and Design-Bid-Build projects while employing safety protocols.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror can identify two (2) or more completed Design Build and one (1) or more completed Design-Bid-Build