Am5.pdf

11. CONlRACT IDCODE OF PAGESIPAGElAMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 22

2. AMENDMEN1IMuuIFIC ...ITON NO 3. EFFE IVE A 4. REQUI ITI

0005 Jul 30, 2009 NA

6, ISSUED BY 00"' W912PL 7, ADMINISTERED BY

(I appicOIe), " HASEREQ NQ IS. PROJECT NO, I

(If or1l<", ,hanlrem 6) CODE

LOS JillGELES DISTRICT, CORPS

P. O. BOX 532711

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

OF ENGINEERS

See Block 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No" 5freer, counly, State and ZIP Code!

'X

Ir 1'

CODE FACILITYCOOE

9A. AMENuMENT Of SOLICIATION NO.

W912PL-09-R-0029

9B,OATED (SEE ITEM II)

Apr 29, 2009 lOA. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO lOB. DATED ISEE ITEM 13) o The .bove numbered ",Iiei"nion" amended a, «o! t"'th i~J'em 14. Th" hour.M d.,e'P<'t,(,ed ro. receIpt orOffers lEI is ei:lended, 0 is nOl e.ten<led

Offer< mu" acknowledge ,eceipI of IhlS amendmen' prior (0 ,he hcur .nd da,e <pe<:ifi~d In 'he ",IICit."on 0' as amended, by one of the follOWing methods:

la)By completing item' B and 15, and relurning ~cpie< or the amerldm~nl;(bl B, ackrlOwledgir.g receipl of Ihi' .mendmen, 01\ each copy of 'he offer submil tPd' or Ic) By ,epara,e leIter or telegram which include' a reference to the .olicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE ~LACE

DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS ~RIOR 10 THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by 'irrue of 'hIS am~ndment your de'ire 10 change .n ofter .I,~ody ,ubmiTled ,u,h ,hang~ may b~ mad<o,b~ 1l,leqrarn or lener, o(p'ided each ,el<'g,am or I"""r make' refe'ence 10 the <olici""ion and Ihis '''\~nOm"nl,and 0' '""e"ed PI"" 10 ih~ open'ng houT and da,e 'petihed.

11 ACCOlJNlING AND APPROPIRAT10N DATA (lfrequirNJ)

1l. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBEO IN ITEM 14.

CrlEC( ON~

------j n

A THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANTTO:

NO.INIT~M'OA

(Spe<:ifYaUlhority) THE CHANGES SET FORTli IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTIlACT OHDER n' TriE AOOIIE NUMBeRED CONlIlACT/ORQER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES dfJfJrdfJrooliOfldtJl~, ele. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANlTOTriE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.10W'1 i,u~h d' change' in paying offtc", n n° nilS SUF~LEMENTAlAGREEMENT I ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITYOF:

OTHER (5pecifY Iype ofmodifkaliO/1 and oUlhorily)

E.IMPORTANT: Contractor IE] IS not, CJ is required to 5ign thi5 document and return _____ copies to the Issuing office.

14, DESCRIPTlON OF AMENDMENT/MODIFK:ATION ( Df9onilod by UCF ''''II"" hear!in'l' indudmg ,olldtarloniconlractsubject matter whe", r"d'ibi"J MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) IN SUPPORT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS {VA)PROJECTS PRIMARILY IN THE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT AND IN SUPPORT OF VA PROJECTS WITHIN THE SOUTH

PACIFIC DIVISION, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.

Amendment is to extend the proposal dUe date from 3 August 2009 to 6 August 2009.

Revised SF 1442 attached Sections 00 01 10 and 00 01 20 - Replace in its entirety (correction of paragraph numbering and provide complete table of content) Section 00 10 10 - Replace Page 00 10 10-3 - Item e-1-4 deleted Delete and replace attached drawings - Sheet Numbers 6, 21 and 24 of 78 a Excep, as provided herein all term, and conditions or 'ne oocument rel"'''f\Ced In I,~m QA or lOA" heretofore changed. remain, unchanged and in full force and e!fee'

1SA. NAME AND TITLE UI- ~I,",NER (Typ"orpri,t) 16A. N ME ANuTITLE OF CONTRACTING Ul-FI.EM (Typ"orprim!

I 5B. CONTRIICl"OllJOf f E!ID~

(5i'lnoru,e of pmon oUlhonled rn signl

15C.DATESIGNED 16B. UNITED STATtSO~ AMERICA

15rgnmu'e ofc""I'ocrm'l Officer)

1&C, DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540{)1·1 <;2· ElQ70 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV, 10 83) Fre.iou' pdi';on unu,abl" P",,,,,bed byG$A FAR (4B CFRI 53,243

; SOLICITATION NUMBER ' 2, TYPE OF SOLICITATION 3, DATE ISSUED I, PAGE OF PAGES

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

D SEALED BID (IFB) .

229 J,pr 20G~ - OF~?12PL-09-R-0029(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) [X] NEGOTIATED (RFP) \

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be wily completed by the offeror.

4 CONTRACT NUMBER :; REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER I' PROJECT NUf.4BER

7, ISSUED BY CODE B ADDRESS OFFER TO

LTSACE, Lo' Angeles District See r tern 7 Contracting Division, West Region Branch 9:5 Wilshire Blvd, 10th Floor p o. Box 532711, Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325

B TELEPHONE NUMBER (Inolude area code) {NO COLLECT CALLS!

.... 1 ,A. NAME

9, FOR INFORMATION CALL TIN.r;. FRAZIER/PAT BONILLA 21]/452-3252/3255

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidGer".

10, THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED I.'. THESE DQCUMENTS (Till.,. Id"n~1ying number, dete):

MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) IN SUPPORT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS (VA) PROJECTS PRIMARILY IN THE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT AND IN SUPPORT OF VA PROJECTS WITHIN THE SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. The overall contract,work shall consist of but not limited to hospital related architectural, civil, mechanical, electrical, structural, environmental, infectious disease control disciplines, hospital related asbestos & lead based paint abatement.

hospital related construction work consisting of but not limited to general construction.

alteratiohs, removal and replacement of existing structure, removal of existing building interior finishes, building interior site clearing, site clearing. earthwork, pavement, concrete, masonry. structural, carpentry, interior work, roofing work. mechanical, electrical, communications, HVAC, fire sprinkler systems, painting, building appurtenant work, infectious disease control, phasing of work in an operational hospital environment, coordination with operational hospital staff. This contract will have a base period and 1-year option periods_ The estimated cost range of this acquisition is $49,500,000_00

The solicitation will be advertised in accordance with FAR 36.3 entitled "Two Phase Design Build Selection Procedures".This procurement is a 100\ set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business firms. See Section 00700, clause entitled, "NOTICE OF TOTAL SERVICE-DISABLED VETEFAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE (MAY 2001)", FAR 52.219-27, for further information.

OFFERORS PLEASE NOTE: This project may be delayed. cancelled or revised at any time during the solicitation, negotiation and/or award process.

11. The Conlractor shali begin performance wilhin --"C0,-- c'llendar d'lr-; and complele il wilhin __• calendar days 'liter r8ce;ving o award, [K] notice to proceed. This performance period is lliJ mandelory, D nagoliable. (See *Section 00800

128. CALENDAR DAYS 12A THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFQR~ANCE PAYMENT aONDS~ (I' "YES,· indicate wittlln how many calender days after ewarCin Item 128.'

[]YES D NO

13, ADDITiONAL SOLICITATION REQUIRE~ENTS

A. Sealed oilers. in Oll~inal 'lnd ** copies to perform the work required ere due et the place specified in nem 8 by :: , 00 PM (hour) local lime 2009 Aug 06 (date). It this is a sealed biO solicitation, offers will ba pubiicly opened attha! time. Sealed envelopes conlaJning oHers shall be marked \0 show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation num~ar, and lhe dale 'lnd ~n16 o!'fars are due.

B. An offer guaranlee 0 il;. D is not required

C All oilers are SUbject 10 tile (1) work 'equirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated ,n the solicilation In lull lexl or by relerence.

D Offers proViding less lhan 120 calendar days lor Governmem acceptance alter the dale oilers ere due will not be conSidered and wilt be releclad, ,jSN 7540_01·155·!212 14':2·103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV 4-85) lEG, Des'gned \l~ng Penoln\ Pco, W"iSIDIOR, Oel 95 Pc.,c"De~ D~' GSA· FAR ;~8 erRi 5,.230·1,:JiAmendment 0005 - Phase II

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

14, NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15, TELEPHONE NUMBER Iinciudearea code)

{) F,ll.x

DUNS NO.;

CAGE CODE NO.

TAX 10 NO.;

16 REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if differem than Ilem 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required althe prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicrtation, if this offer IS eccepled by the Govemment in writing wilhin celendar days affer lhe date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or grearer than the minimum reqUirement slated in 130. Failure lo insert any number means the offeror accepts Ihe minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS ~ I

18. The offeror agrees 10 furnish any required pertormance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offfjror acknowledges receipt ofamendments to Ihe sollcllation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

2OA. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or pnnt) 2OB, SiGNATURE 2OC. OFFER DATE

AWARD (fo ba compleled by Govemment)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22, AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24,SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN iN (4 copies unless oth8fWise specified)

26 ADMINISTERED BY CODE

~ liTEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN CO

010 U,S.C, 2S04(cl ( )

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

MPETrflON PURSUANT TO

041 U,S.C, 253(cl {

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

026, NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor Is required to sign this document and return copies to the ISSUIng office,) Contractor agrees (0 furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requiremants idanltfied on this form and any continuation sheelS Jor the consideration staled in lhis contrac1. The rights and obligations of lhe parties (0 this conlract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) lhe solicitation, and

(c) lhe clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract

30A NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type Or pnntJ

30B SIGNATURE [SOC DATE

o 29, AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby aCGepled as to the rtems listed. This award consummate~ the contract, which consisls of (a) lhe Government solicilalion and your offer, and (d) lhis conlract award, No further cormaclUal document is necessary.

31A NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or prinl)

31 C AWARD DATE 318, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,y

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV 4-65\

Amendment 0005 - Phase II

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W912PL-09-R-0029, Phase 11 USACE. Los Angeles District Recommission Isolation Rooms.

VA Lorna Linda, San Bernardino. CA

SECTION 00 01 10

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

I. WHO MAY SUBMIT

II. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

III. WHERE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL

IV. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

V. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

VI. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

VII. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VIII. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

Amendment 0005 SECTION 00 01 10

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W912PL-09-R-0029, Phase II

Recommission Isolation Rooms, VA Loma Linda, San Bernardino, CA

J. WHO MAY SUBMIT

This is Phase II of the 2-Phase Design-Build RFP. Only those successful offerors that were determined to be in the competitive range from the PhliSe I portion ofthe source selection are eligible to submit a proposal for evaluation.

n. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

In order 10 effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive intormation sufficiently detailed that clearly indicate compliance with the proposal submission requirements.

Ill. WHERE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL

Offeror.'> shall submit their proposal packages to the USACE contracting activity address sho"'TI ill Section

00100 RFP.

IV SUBMISSION DEADLINE

Proposals shall be received by thc USACE contracting activity no later than the lime and date specified in on thc SF-1442 of the RFP.

V. PROPOSAL REQU1REMENTS AND SUBMISSlON FORMA T

(a) Three-ring binders are preterred. Do nol use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion ofadditional pages.

(b) "Confidential" projects cannol be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation liS specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Govemment liS part of the Offeror's technical proposal. Offeror's that include in their proposal information that they do not want disclosed to the public tor any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, "Instruetions to

Offeror----eompetitive Aequisirion", paragraph (3), "Restriction on disclosure and use of data".

(c) The Corps of Engineers recognizes that Sllbmittals by the Offeror may contain confidential or proprietary information; howevcr, the Government reservcs the right to make inquiries into the information disclosed. The submission of false or misleading information may be grollnds for disqualification ofthe proposal.

VI. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

(a) Number of Sets: Submit One (I) original and one copy only.

(b) This section does not count in the page count of the technical proposal.

(c) Format and Contents shall be Tabbed as shown below:

TAB # A SF~ 1442, Corporate Certificate. with acknowledgemenr of amendments

TAB # B SECTlON 00010 TASK ORDER 0001 PRICING SCHEDULE

TAB#C BID GUARANTEE, STANDARD FORM 24 "BID BOND"

TAB#D PREAWARD SURVEY DATA INFORMATION·

·TAS #0 PREA WARD SURVEY DATA- In accordance with FAR 9.103(a)..contracts shall be awarded

Amendmenr 0005 SECTION 00 01 10

- 2

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W9l2PL-09-R-0029, Phase II USACE, Los Angeles District Recommission Isolation Rooms, VA Lorna Linda, San BemardillO, CA to responsible prospcctive contracwrs only. To be detennined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the standards at FAR 9.104 that requires a prospective contractor [0 have adequate financial resources to perfonn the contract or the ability to obtain them. As an aid in assessing rcsponsibility, thc offeror shall provide the following two items:

J) a lener of reference from their bank or financial institution that demonstrates the offeror's resources or thc ability to obtain them for the proposed comraet, and

2 ) a current financial statement

VII. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

(a) Number of Sets and Pages of the Technieal Proposal: Submit original and two (2) additional sets of the wrinen Technical ProposaL with each set separately packaged. The Technical Proposals shall be in 8-J/2" x 1J" fonnat, bound as a single document, with single-sided pages. This includes any examples of sketches, drawings, pictures, schedules, and organizational chan. Do nO[ use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font sty Ie such as script. or condensed print. The Technical Proposals shall have a cover sheet that shall conform to the requirements of paragraph V of this section. The Technical Proposals shall bc separated with section tabs, and the tabs shall clearly identify the contents of each scction. Maximum number of pages for Technical Proposal is fifty (SO) pages. Each page shall bc sequentially numbered for that section. The cover and thc section tabs will not be evaluated and are considered as hclping to organize the material contents ofthe proposal.

(b) Fonnat and Contents ofthc Technical ProposalfList ofTabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The tabs below directly correlate to the evaluation factors idcntified in Section 00 0 I 20.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB A FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH

TAB B

FACTOR 2: PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND

PRELlMTNARY SCHEDULE

TAB C FACTOR3: MANAGEMENT PLAN

(c) Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each ofthe tabs as follows:

a, Tab A. FACTOR I: TECHNICAL APPROACH. Provide narratives and drawings to describe your unique technical design solution. These elements must reinforce each other and should be self-explanatory in presenting your technical solution, L) Narratives. The uarrative shall cover all features of the proposed design for all the disciplines required. The Offeror shall make a statement that their design complies with the most current regulations, standards, codes, and design requiremcnts in this solicitation. The narrative shall include but not necessarily be limited to the following:

(a) Infectious Disease rcquirements - Include the rationale for the major features of the design. Clearly delineate the elements of c01l5truction. Provide a site-specific description of the requirements to include infectious disease special requirements. Describe how the analysis of hospital environment infonnation has been used to develop an understanding of the proposed construction. Describe how maintenance is 10 be perfonned including any required equipmenr.

- 3

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W9l2PL-09-R-0029, Phase II

Recommission Isolation Rooms, VA Lorna Linda, San Bernardino, CA

(b) ARCHlTECTURAL - Describc aesthetic fcatures, if required.

b. Tab B. FACTOR 1: PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION, NARRATIVE AND PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE:. Preliminary Schedule includes a narrative, proposed contract duration, and a schedule to includc a gnat chart.

I.) Contract Duration and Narrative. By narrative, address how yon will maintain, update and use your schedule for example resources, work days, number of hours, and uumber of crews. Specifically state the number or calendu days you are proposing for completion of this project. The Offeror shaH include the following statcment within this narrative: "We propoJie to accomplish lhis project in __ (insert number) calendu days (to include coordination with hospital stafT) and acknowledge that this duration become contractually binding in thc event or contract awant." The proposed duration should also be the same as shown in the gnat chart that is submitted for this evaluation factor. Be advised that any assessment of liquidated damages will be based on the proposed duration aceepted by the Government.

2.) Preliminary Schedule. The preliminary schedule shall be inserted within Tab B of the biuder in graphic format, submit a proposed schedule in calendu days for the design and construction of Ihis projeet. Do not submit a schedule in workdays. The preliminary schedule will. after task order award, be rcplaced with a final schedule as required in thc Project Sehedule Section 013201 of the solicitation.

The preliminary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by wnich milestones are to be achieved. Assume an NTP date of 30 August 2009. Give special attention to the following tasks:

• Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the design submittals and associated Government review requirements;

• Show the construction phase for each major feature of construction; including, site work, utilities, and material and equipment lead times, as applicable. The schedule shall demonstrate the Offeror's understanding ofthc relationship between design after award and construction;

for the purposes of this submission tnat tne Government will exercise the options; and show project eloscout activities, including as applicable, commissioning, As-Builts, O&M mannal submission, and turnover of the pr~iect.

c. ..I.il.h.£. FACTOR3: MANAGEMENT PLAN

1.) Key Pcrsonnel. Use the Personnel Resume Form shown at the end of this Section to provide qualifications for the kcy personnel who will be dedicated to this project. Lines may be added to the Personnel Rcsume form, as needed, to allow input of additional infonnation. In the event of contract award, these personnel, as identified, must be used on this project except as allowed in Section 00800, Special Contract Requirements, regarding substitution of key personnel after award.

(a) Construction Team: Include the Construetion Project Manager, Construction Site Superintendent, Contractor Quality Control Manager, and Safety Manager.

(b) Design Team: Include the Desi.gn Project Manager, Design Quality Control Manager, Civil Engineer, Geotechnieal Engineer, Structural Engineer. State whieh individuals will be the registered designers of record for this project and provide their respective year of professional registration (see FAR clause 52.236-25). Providing design team members with 5·years experience or more with the current finn is advantageous, but not requircd.

(Cl Provide letters of commitment for all key personnel on the Primary Design/Construction

- 4

Design Build MATOC. VA Projects W912PL-09-R-0029, Phase II

Recommission Isolation Rooms, VA Lorna Linda, San Bemardino. CA prqject team and any proposed altemate personnel. By identifYing the key personnel, the Offeror is making a commitment that, barring unforeseen eireumstances, they are the personnel who will be assigned to the project. A letter of commitment from each firm committing specific individuals from the finn may be provided in lieu of separate letters for cach individual. After eontract award, substitutions for any key personnel or alternates shall require the Contracting Officer's approval. Note: A single letter of commitment may idenrify and commit multiple key personnel.

2.) Narrative/Organizarion Chart. Provide a narrative addressing each of the following irems along with an overall organization chart that graphicallY depiets the key positions, their interrelationships in your design-build team, and clear lines of authority and communieation chain of the organization and its major subcontractors.

(a) Prime Contractor: Describe the organization, responsibilities, and lines of authority including those for the Quality Control personnel established to complete the design and construction of this project. Describe the proposed management structure for the design and construction team. Discuss if the team has worked rogether previously and how the design and construction process will be managed, to include a discussion on how changes will be handled and a discussion ofdelegation of authority within the team. State why your [lIm is especially qualified to undertake this project.

(b) Design Team: Describe the organization, responsibilities, lines of authority established to complete the design, and how design changes will be handled. Describe the responsibility of the designers dming the construction phase. State why your design finn(s) is especially qualified to undertake this project.

(c) Design-Build Management: Describe how the Design-Build management team organization will interact during design and construction, including the role of the key subcontractors during design and construcTion. Also, how they will interrelate with the hospital staff and patients.

The intent is that Ihe offeror describe how the prime contractor. designer of record, and key subcontractors interact during construction and how the prime contractor, designers and key subcontractor, superintendent, CQC Manager, Safety Manager. construction PM interact during design.

- 5 •

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W9J2PL-09·R-0029, Pha<;e II

Recommission Isolation Rooms, VA Lorna Linda., San Bernardino, CA

VIII. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

(a) Fonnat for the Technical Proposal Cover Sheet: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c)(i Hv). This provision, titled "Instructions to Offerors-Compelitive Acquisition," has been provided in full text in Section 00100.

(b) Tne fonnat is as follows:

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

I. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of tne Offeror and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extenl of agreement with all tenns, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnisn any or all items as required:

4. Names, titles, and telepnone and facsimile numbers (and electronie addresses jf available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Ofteror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Amendment 0005 SECTION 0001. to -6

Design Build MATOC, VA Pro.ie<:ts W912PL-09·R-0029, Phase II

Recornmission Isolation Rooms, VA Loma Linda. San Bernardino, CA

PERSONNEL RESUME FORM

(VOLUME 2, TABC)

Check applicable block:

KEY PERSONNEL:

CONSTRUCTION TEAM:

[ ] Construction Projeet Manager [ ] Construction Site Superintendent [ ] Contractor Quality Control System Manager [ ] Safety Manager

DESIGN TEAM:

[ ] Design Project Manager [} Structural Engineer [ 1Architect [ 1Mechanieal Engineer [ ] Civil Engineer [ ] Electrieal Enginccr [ ] Geotechnical Engineer

Name of Individuat: _

Employed by:

Number of years with firm: _

Numbcr of years as practicing professional in your currcnt fic1d:__

Education (degree(s)/year/ specialization):

Achievements, Special Recognition, and Honors:

Experience: (most recent to earliest)

Project: ~ Company _

Dates: From to Present:

Type of Construction:

Duties & Responsibilities:

Amendment 0005 SECTION 0001 10

- 7

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W912PL-09-R-0029, Phase II

Recommission Isolation Rooms, VA Loma Linda, San Bernardino, CA

Project: C,ompany _

Dates: From '0

Project: _____________Company

Dates: From to _

Project: __Company _, Dates: From to

Amendment 0005 SECTlON 00 01 10

- 8

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W912PL-09~R-0029,Phase II

Recommission Isolation Rooms.

VA Loma Linda, San Bernardino. CA

Duties & Responsibilities:

Amendment 0005 SECTION 0001 10

- 9

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W912PL-09-R-0029

SECTION 00 01 20

PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD

I, ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING BEST VALUE TRADEOFF

III. RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

IV. GENERAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

V. EVALUATION Ot' TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VI. LIST OF EVALUATION FACTORS, SUB-FACTORS AND SPECIFIC

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

VII. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVALUATION FACTORS

VIII. EVALUAnON OF PRICE PROPOSAL

IX. EVALUATION STANDARDS

X. BASIS FOR AWARD

XI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

XII. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

XIII. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PREAWARD COSTS

SECTION 000120Amendment 0005

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W9l2PL-09-R-0029

1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In aceordance with FAR 1.602-I(b), no task order shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures thai all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the requirement at FAR 9 that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an afTImlative detemlination of responsibility. To be detemlined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards ofF AR 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

This is the Phase II of a two phase step selection process. This phase of the solicitation will award a minimum of three (3) SDVOSB MATOC contracts. In addition, the first Task Order will be awarded to one (I) of those contraetors for a specific project as identified in this solicitation. This first task order will be awarded based on Best Value/Tradeoff.

H. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

The Government will select the offer that represents the best value to the Government by using the trade off process described in FAR Part 15. This process pennits trade-offs between price and teehn ical faetors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer. The award decision will be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source seleetion criteria in the solicitation.

Proposals shall nor use broad statement::. such as: "Offeror understands", or "will comply with the specifications". or statements paraphrasing the specifications. and general or ovcrly broad statcments such as "standard proeedures will be employed" or "well known techniques will be used". Proposals with these type of statements will be rated non-acceptable.

III. RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

All technical evaluation factors, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price and listed in descending order of importance below. The Government is conccrned with obtaining the most advantageous balance between technical merit/quality and co::.t/price to the Government. The degree of importanee of price could beeome grcater depending upon the equality of the technical proposals. If eompeting technical proposals are detennined to be essentially equal, price could become the controlling factor. lbe Government may award a contract on the basis of initial offers reeeived without discussions;

therefore, the Offeror's proposal should contain the best terms from a technical and price standpoint.

IV. GENERAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

a. The offerors confonnance with the specified fonnat and submission reguirements will be considered during the teehnical evaluation. Failure to comply with the format and/or the submission requirements may be seen as indicative ofthe type of problems that could be expected durirlg contract perlomlance. La>:k of confonnance eould therefore result in a higher risk assessment in addition to any other impacts on the evaluation. Material omission!s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

b. The adjectival rating, of the Teehnical Proposal may be negatively affected ifthe specified information is not provided in the specified location in accordanee with the submission instructions in

Seetion 00 0 I 10.

c. The adjectival rating of the Technical Proposal may be negatively affected if the proposals are generic, vague, or lacking in detail.

d. The degree of risk to the Govemment inherent in the offerors technical proposal will be a consideration under this factor.

SECTION 00 0 I 20

- 2

Amendment 0005

e. The Government will not consider any proposal based on a deftcient offer. Therefore a rating of unsatisfactory under any factor or sub·factor will make the offer ineligible, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with Offeror's and all deficiencies arc remedied in revised proposals.

V, EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

The Government wm evaluate each Offeror's tcchnical proposal based on how well the proposal addresses each oflhe Evaluation FactoI'!> listed below and further described in the submission requirements in Section 00110. The evaluation process includes an assessment of the Offeror's strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies and risks in addressing the Government's requirements as specified in the solicitation. Proposal risk, which is the risk assoeiatcd with the Offeror's proposed apprmu:h, will be considered in conjunction witn the technical merit for each factor.

VI. LIST OF EVALUATION FACTORS, SUB-FACTORS AND SPECIFIC TECHNICAL

EVALUATION CRITERIA

In order to be considered technically acceptable. technical proposals must meet the following minimum rcquirements:

Tab A. FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH. Provide narratives and drawings to describe your unique technical design solution. These elements must reinforce each other and should be self explanatory in prescnting your technical solution.

\.) Narratives. The nlllTative shall cover all features of the proposed design for all the disciplines required. The Offeror shall make a statement that their design complies with the most current regulations, standards, codes, and design rcquirements in this solicitation. The narrative shall include but not necessarily be limited to thc following:

(a) Infectious Diseasc requirements - Include the rationale for the major fcatures of the design. Clearly delineate the elemems of construction. Provide a site-specific description of the requirements to inelude infectious disease special requiremems. Describe how the analysis of hospital environment infonnation has been uscd to develop an understanding of the proposed eonstruction. Describe how maintenance is to be performed including any required equipment.

(b) ARCHITECTURAL - Dcscribe aesthetic features, if required.

b. Tab B. FACTOR 2: PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION, NARRATIVE AND PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE. Preliminary Schedule includes a narrative, proposed contract duration, and a schedule to includc a gnat chart.

I.) Contract Duration and NllITative. By narrative, address how you will maintain, update and use your schedule for example resources, work days, number of hours, and number ofcrews. Specifically ,tate the number of calendar day, you are proposing for completion of thi, project. The Offeror shall includc the following statement within this narrative: "We propose to accomplish this project in __ (insert nunlber) calendar days (10 include coordination with hospital 'taro and acknowledge that this duration become cont!"8ctually binding in the event of contract award." The proposed duration should also be the same as shown in the gnat chart that is submitted for this evaluation factOT. Be advised that any assessment ofIiquidated damages will be bascd on the proposed duration accepted by the Government.

2.) Preliminary Schedule. The preliminary schedule shall be inserted within Tab B of the binder in graphic format, submit a proposed schedule in calendar days for the design and constrUction of this projcct. Do not submit a schedule in workdays. The preliminary schedule will, after ta5k order award, be replaced with a final schedule as requircd in the Project Schedule Section 01 3201 ofthe solicitation.

The preliminary schedule shall be task oriented. indicating the number of calendar days, after nOlice to

Amendment 0005 SECTION 00 0 I 20

- 3 lJSACE, Los Angeles District proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Assume an NTP date of 30 August 2009. Give special attention to the following tasks:

• Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the design submi".als and associated Government review requirements;

• Show the construction phase for each major feature of construction; including, site work, utilities.

and material and equipment lead times, as applicable. The sehedule shall demonstrate the Offeror's understanding of the relationship between design after award and construction;

for the purposes of this submission that the Government will exercise the options; and show project closeout activities, including as applicable, commissioning, As-Buitts, O&M manual submission, and turnover of the project.

c. Tab C. FACTOR 3: MANAGEMENT PLAN

I.) Kev Personnel. Use the Personnel Resume Form shown at the end of this Section to provide qualifieations for the key personnel who will be dedicated to this project. Lines may be added to the Personnel Resume form, as needed, to allow input of additional information. In the event of contract award, these personnel, as identified, must be used on this pr~iect except as allowed in Section 00800, Speeial Contract Requirements, regarding substitution of key personnel after award.

(a) Construction Team: Include the Construction Project Manager, Construction Site Superintendent. Contractor Qua.lity Control Manager, and Safety Manager.

(b) Design Team: Include the Design Project Manager, Design Quality Control Manager, Civil Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Structural Engineer. State which individuals will be the registered designers of record for this project and provide their respective year of professional registration (see FAR clause 52.236-25). Providing design team members with 5-years experience or more with the current firm is advantageous, but not required.

(c) Provide leners of commitment for all key personnel on the Primary Des.ign/Construction project team and any proposed alternate personnel. By identifying the key personnel, the Offeror is making a commitment that, barring unforeseen circumstances., they are the personnel who will be assigned to the project. A letter of commitment from each firm commining specific individua.ls from the firm may be provided in lieu of separate leners for each individual. After contract award. substitutions for any key personnel or alternates shall require the Contracting Officer's approval. Note: A single lener of commitment may identify and commit multiple key personnel.

2.) Narrative/Organization CMrt. Provide a narrative addressing each of the following items along with an overall organization chan that graphically depicts the key positions. their interrelationsnips in your design-build team. and clear lines of authority and communication chain of the organization and its major subcontractors.

(a) Prime Contractor: Describe the organization. responsibilities. and lines of authority including those for the Quality Control personnel established to complete the design and construction of this project. Describe the proposed management strucrure for the design and construction team. Discuss if the tearn has worked together previously and how the design and construction process will be managed, to include a discussion on how changes will be handled and a discussion of delegarion of authority within the team. State why your firm is especially qualified to Wldertake this project.

(b) Design Team: Describe the organization. responsibilities, lines of authority established to complete the design, and how design changes will be handled. Describe the responsibility of the designers during the construction phase. State why your design finn(s)

Amendment 0005 SECTION 0001 20 -4

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects VV9l2PL-09-R-0029 is especially qualified to undertake this projeet.

(c) Design-Build Management: Describe how the Design·Build management team organization will interact during design and construction, including the role of the key subcontractors during design and construction. Also, how they will interrelate with the hospital staff and patients.

The intent is that the offeror describe how the prime contractor, designer of record, and key subcontractol'$ inreract during construction and how the prime contractor, designers and key subcontractor, superintendenr, CQC Manager, Safety Manager, construction PM interact during design.

VII. RELAnVE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Faclor I, Technieal Approach (TAB A), Factor 2. Proposed Contract Duration and Preliminary Schedule (TAB B), and Factor 3, Management Plan (TAB C) are listed in descending order of importance.

(See Table [.)

b. COMBINED RELATIVE IMPORTANCE, AND PRICE PROPOSAL ~ All technical evaluation faetors, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price.

Relative Importance of Evaluation Fadors

Table I. Technical Evaluafoon Facto" Criteria

Factor I: Technical Annroach Factor 2: Proposed Contract Duration and Preliminary Schedule Factor 3: Mana\!ement Plan

VIII. (VALUAnON OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Price will not be rated or combined with any other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it is realistic for the work to be performed; renects a clear understanding of the requirements; and is consistent with the Offeror's technical proposal. Additionally, all offel'$ with separately priced line items will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing, Price is a factor 1n establishing the competitive range prior to discussions (if held) and in making the final best value determination for award.

IX. [VALUATION ST ANDARDS.

Evaluation criteria (factol'$) will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions. Evaluators wilJ apply the appropriate adjective to each criterion rated. The evaluator's narrative explanation must clearly establish that the Offeror's submittal meets the definitions established below. As each criterion is evaluated an assessment of Risk will be made. The "Proposal Risk Assessment" ratings are applicable to all criteria except Past Performance. Past Performance Risk is rated using the '·Past Perfonnance Risk Assessment" rntings listed below.

a. Rating Adjecti.ves

1) OUTSTANDING - lnfonnation submitted demonstrates Offeror's potential to significantly excced performance or capability standards. The Offeror has clearly demonstrated an under~tanding of all aspects of the requirements to the extent that timely and highest quality perfonnance is anti~ipated. ~he Offeror possesses exceplional strengths that wiH significanlIy benefit the Government An aSSigned ratlng

Amendment 0005 SECTION 000120

- 5

Design Build MATOC, VA Projects W9l2PL·09-R-0029

USACE, Los Angelcs District of "outstanding" indicates that, in tenns of the specific factor, the submittal contains no significant wcaknesses, deflciencies or disadvantages. Offeror very significantly exceeds most or all solicitation requirements.

Rbk Level: Very Low.

2) ABOVE AVERAGE: - Infonnation submitted demonsrrares Offeror's potemial to excced perfonnance or capability standards. Offeror possesses multiple strengths that will benefit the Government.

The areas in which the Offeror exceeds the requirements are llI1ticipatcd to result in a high level of efficiency. produClivity. or quality. The Offeror's qualifications are responsive with few minor weaknesses, but no major weaknesses noted. An assigned rating of "Above Averagc" indicates that, in tenns of the specific faclor, any weaknesses noted are minor and should nor seriously affect the offeror's pcrtormance.

Offeror fully meets all RFP requirements and significantly exceeds many of the RFP requirements.

Risk Level: Lo,,"'

3) SATISFACTORY lnfonnation submittcd demoJlStrates Offeror's potential to meet perfonnance or capability standards. The Offeror's proposal contains weaknesses in several areas that are offset by strengths in other areas. Offeror meets all RFP requirements. No significant advantages or disadvantages.

Risk Level: Moderate

4) MARGINAL - The assignment of a rating of "Marginal" indicates that mandatory corrective action would be required to prevent significant deficiencies from affecting the overall project. The submittal is not adequately responsive or does not address thc specific factors. Offeror displays low probability of success, although the submittal has a reasonable chance of becoming at least acceptable.

Significant disadvantages.

Risk Level: High

5) SUSCE:PTIBLE TO BEING MADE ACCEPTABLE - The proposal demonstrates an approach which, as initially proposed, cannot be rated Marginal because of error(s), omission(s), or defidency(ies) which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposaL These solutions are further considered to reflect high to very high risk in that they lack clarity and precision, are generally unsupported, and do not demonstrate a complete understanding of the requirements.

Risk Level: High to Very High

6) UNSATISFACTORY - An "Unsatisfactory" rating represents major errors, omiSSIOns, or deficiencies, or has an unacceptably high degree of risk in meeting the Govemment's requirements. The Ofleror's qualifications are so unacceptable that il would have to be completely revised in order to attempt to make rhem acceptable. The submittal does not meet the minimum requirements of the RFP.

Risk Level: Very High

X. BASIS FOR AWARD

a. The Government will award a finn fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror(s) whose proposal, confonning to the solicitation, is fair llI1d reasonable, and has been dctcnnined to be most advantageous to the Government, quality (comprised of technical approach and performance capability, factors), price and other factors considered. The rated/scored technieal evaluation crireria is considered more important than and price. As technical scores llI1d relative advantages and disadvantages become less disrinct, differences in price between proposals are of increased importance in detennining the most advantageous proposal. Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in scoring and relative advantages and disadvantages between proposals are of increased importance to the detennination.

B. The Governmenr reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer. The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers. The basis of award will be a confonning offer, the price or cost of which mayor may not be the lowest. If other than the lowest offer, it must be sufficiently more

SECTION 000120

- 6

Amendment 0005

Design Build MATOC, VA Projeets W912PL-09-R-0029 USACE, Los Angeles Distriet advantageous than the lowest offer to justifY the payment of additional amounts.

c. Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price tenns in their initial oller and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discu~~ions. if deemed to be within the best interests of the Government."

d. The Government intends to award three (3) to a maximum of five (5) MATOC contracts and one

(1) task order to one of the 3 to 5 contractors awarded a contract without discussions based on initial proposals received; there tore, the proposals shall contain the offeror's best tenns from a cost and technical standpoint.

XI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

The Government intends to evaluate technical proposals withom discussiom, but reserves the right to conduct discussions and receive revised proposals iflaler detennincd to be necessary.

XII. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS.

If discussions are held. upon completion of discussions, the Government shall issue to all Phase II om~rors a request for tinal proposal revisions. Following the evaluation of final proposal revisions, the Government will select the source whose final proposal revision is most advalltageous, considering only the factors included in the solicitation.

XIII. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PREAWARD COSTS.

The Request for Proposal does not commit the Govemment to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of the initial and/or any subsequent proposals or for any other costs incurred prior to execution of the Contract.

Amendment 0005 SECTION 000120 -7

Lorna Linda Health System including plans, specifications, design analysis and distribute to required agencies in accordance wit.h section 01 33 16.

Schematic Design phase requires at least TWO (2) meet.ings with end users, contract.ing officer and project. engineer.

2. The 100% Design Documents shall be equivalent. t.o complet.e const.ruction document.s. Design Build Contractor shall not leave any part of t.he speclficat.ion or drawings incomplet.e with the intention of completing the documents as part of the Construction phase. The DESIGN BUILD CONTPACTOR shall hold a one day design progress meeting with contracting officer, hospital officials, project engineer, VA technical personnel and end users to gather comments to be incorporated into the project for the preparation of Const.ruction Documents. DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR shall prepare minutes of meeting and submit to contracting officer for comments/approval.

3. DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR shall complete Construction Documents.

4. Allow for a 30 day review of submittals by the Corps of Engineers and VA on each phase of the design.

e. Construction Schedule and Ph_sing:

1. Submit all necessary submittals and samples including construction schedule and schedule of values within 21 calendar days after issuance of Construction Notice to Proceed by the Contracting Officer and in accordance with Section 01 33 16 "Design After Awardn • Submit two copies of construction schedule, schedule of values, and all materlal/equipment submittals to architect, one copy to Army Corps of Engineers, and one copy to VA Loma Linda for review and approval.

2. No on-site work will be conducted outside the containment area.

3. Work shall normally be scheduled between 7:00 am to 4;30 pm, Monday through Friday. Some after hours work may be required.

4 . DBLETED IN AMENDMENT 5.

5. Utility outages require 14 day notification.

II. GENERAL CONTRACT RBQUIREMENTS

a. Design Build Contractor Responsibilities shall be as follows:

1. PRIOR TO DESIGN PHASE

a) The Prior to Design phase will consist of meeting with the end users [or the DES1GN BUILD CONTRACTOR to familiarize themselves with the existing system and its operation.

b) Perform necessary review and research to determine the appropriate equipment to match the existing system.

c) Submit basis of design.

2. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE

SECTION 00 10 10 - 3 AMENDMENT 5

?<3

_1 __- (l \J 6 \J gr" r.

'lil- -

"~ "'tt!H,'1 il'[ij:", • 1-, , '• :~ll·!l iii

I!

~!I

• .," W_'~II

no

"ll 11"1

1,:,, ~r:Z "f_!"~

~"I,ll no

Joil~3!"'~~

8>1 ,'.

:~I

'lIif fIJi

, c--.

l~ , " t-m rC , a ,~ a EEl.

z:3; _"_~ i~

I 1;'1

'll: \!~llrl"l'~I ~! i I."

1111": l!dl~llil:!IIIE9z

,)~ •• ~ i;'~'Il-'I'!I' I" ,I'

I 0

· r---1i¥1.

,I , ~I~ ;, :

C I I'l I

~._._._,_._J_.~~ o €I

Lj.. "" k

1'1 '. , :,"-',& i ~ ~

1-+1+-1-+-1