Solicitation Amendment W912PF25QA0150001.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

The purpose of this amendment is as follows:

a) To postpone the due-in date from 14 July 20205 to 18 July 2025.

b) To modify Addendum to FAR 52.212-2. The changes are in yellow.

c) To correct the name of Attachment #5

d) To reply to the following Request for Information:

QUESTION 1: We are reviewing the documents and on page 115 of the solicitation it says that sub-contracting is not allowed, is that correct?

ANSWER: This is correct. No sub-contracting is allowed.

QUESTION 2: We are sending this email to ask whether the services, frequencies, and square meters of the areas included in Solicitation ID W912PF25QA015 are the same as those in the current contract.

ANSWER: Some services, frequencies, and square meters could be different.

QUESTION 3: We are sending this email to ask if you are able to provide an excel file for compiling the clin for the economic offer and an excel file for the list of Facilities to receive services.

ANSWER: No, we are not. You are required to submit your economic offer filling in the solicitation "Continuation of Supplies or Services and Prices / Costs". The list of Facilities is inserted in the solicitation, paragraph 8.5.

QUESTION 4: Please provide the information about the number of workers currently employed, their salary level based on current CCNL, the base salary and the working hours of each person currently working for the cleaning services. The new contractor has to be compliant to Art, 4 of CCNL, of the cleaning sector that entails the obligation to hire the personnel performing the current cleaning services, in order to safeguard the occupational side, to guarantee the same occupational levels and hourly parameters.

ANSWER: Information is not available.

QUESTION 5: Please confirm that the type of contract under which workers are currently register is national CCNL for staff employed by companies providing cleaning / multi-service services ANSWER: Contract data does not include this information.

QUESTION 6: Please provide the total number of each type of dispenser (soap, paper towels, toilet tissue) and their brands. Then please specify if the new contractor has to replace all the dispensers at the beginning of the contract or to replace only the damaged ones.

ANSWER: We do not have only one brand of soap dispenser, paper towels and toilet tissue but the quoters can consider at least two soap dispensers and paper towels per bathroom and one paper tissue for wc toilets. Complete list of drawings of buildings covered by this contract is included in TE-8 Floor plans. Replacement or repairs are not included in the contract (Government in house personnel will take care of this).

QUESTION 7: Please provide the name of existing contractor, contract number and the awarded price.

ANSWER: The current contractor is N.S.I. NIGRA SERVIZI ITALIA S.R.L. The contract number is W912PF20P0001. At time of award the base and all Option Value (Total Contract Value) was $1,335,390.65. This is the information posted on SAM website at time of award.

QUESTION 8: Please specify if the quantity and the frequencies are different from the last RFQ.

ANSWER: Cleaning services quantity and frequencies were modified in compliance with internal US requirement.

W912PF25QA0150001

List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

The following documents are made part of this Request for Quotation:

Attachment #1 Performance Work Statement consisting of 89 pages dated 28 January 2025

Attachment #2 FTE8 Floor plans consisting of 85 sheets

Attachment #3 - Suitability of Contractor

Attachment #4 Self Certification for Antimafia Communication

Attachment #5 Certification FAR 52.222-56

Attachment #6 Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment #7 Single Document for the Assessment of Interferial Risk (DUVRI: Documento di Valutazione dei Rischi di Interferenza) consisting of 13 pages dated 20 December 2024

Attachment #8 - First Aid Plan Review Oct20 (English)

Attachment #9 - Piano di Primo Intervento Aggiornamento Ott20

Attachment #10 - Hazard General List (English & Italian) dated July 2008

Addendum to Evaluation - Commercial Product and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 W912PF25QA015

A. This acquisition will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, and FAR 13.5 Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items and as supplemented by agency. The source selection process is Lowest Price Technically Acceptable(LPTA). Award will be made to the lowest priced quote that meets or exceeds all the minimum mandatory criteria in the solicitation evaluation factors. Award will be on an "all or none" basis.

Quoters are put on notice that:

a. The non-price factors will be evaluated on an "acceptable/unacceptable" basis.

b. The non-price factors are evaluated for acceptability and not ranked.

c. The term "Quoter" means an individual firm or a Joint Venture. ATI are not allowed. Subcontracting is NOT allowed.

d. Tradeoffs are not permitted.

e. The quoters must provide all required information or the quote will not be considered.

f. In order to be eligible for an award, a quote shall be rated "acceptable" on all non-price factors.

g. The U.S. Government intends to evaluate quotes and award a contract without discussions; however, the U.S. Government reserves the right to hold discussions. It should be noted that there is no obligation on the part of the Government to make an award to any Quoter in response to this Request for Quote

h. Quoters may be asked to clarify some issues regarding the non-price factors to enhance U.S. Government understanding of them. Such clarifications shall NOT be used to cure quote deficiencies or material omissions enter into discussions, and/or otherwise revise the quote.

i. Before awarding, the Government will make a responsibility determination by analyzing whether the apparent successful quoter complies with the requirements of FAR subpart 9.104.

j. The Government intends to enforce all the solicitation/quote submission requirements outlined in Addendum to 52.212-1.

Failure to comply with the solicitation requirements may result in a quoter's quote being rejected. All quote information is subject to verification by the Government.

Exceptions to the terms, conditions, and/or provisions of this solicitation or assumptions within the quote will result in a determination that a quoter is ineligible to be considered for award.

k. Quoters are cautioned that while the Government will not evaluate every Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirement for the purposes of the source selection evaluation, the awardee will be required to comply with the Base PWS requirements during contract performance. The Government may determine, at its discretion, that quoter's quote is unacceptable if the quote indicates that: it cannot or will not meet any of the Base PWS requirements. Unacceptable quotes may be rejected.

l. The Technical Evaluation Board (T.E.B.), comprised of experts appointed by the Contracting Officer, will evaluate the factors listed below, with the concurrence of the Contracting Officer.

m. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotes:

Factor I - Technical

Sub-Factor 1: Company Experience

Sub-Factor 2: Key Personnel

Factor II - Past Performance

Factor III - Price (SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/STANDARD FORM 1449)

EVALUATION APPROACH: Non-price factors are evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis, assigning ratings of "acceptable" or "unacceptable" as defined below.

Acceptable Quote meets the requirement of the solicitation

Unacceptable Quote does not meet the requirement of the solicitation

B. Factor I - Technical

1. Sub-Factor 1 - Company Experience

The Government will evaluate this Sub-factor on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In order to be determined acceptable in this evaluation Sub-factor, the Government will evaluate the quote to ensure Quoter provided at least one (1), but NO MORE than three (3) examples of contracts performed by the company that are recent(within the last three (3) years form the solicitation release date) and relevant in scope and magnitude. If submitting more than one contract, the contracts cannot be combined, and each contract shall be recent and relevant on its own. Relevant in scope means a contract for custodial services, with in Italy, similar to the performance-based requirements specified in Part 5 of the attached PWS. Relevant in magnitude means a contract that includes a yearly value of no less than ). For each example provided, the Euro 250,000.00 ($270,299.49 Quoter shall have identified:

1) Contract number (if available).

2) Contract name and brief description of the requirement.

3) Period of performance (start date and completion date).

4) Contract value for each year of performance.

5) Contract Organization; and

6) Point of Contact for Contract Organization with email and phone number.

In case of a Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile) recent and relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile) entity. If the Joint Venture(Consorzio Stabile) does not have such experience, recent and relevant experience shall be submitted for at least one partner. The experience factor for Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile) is still limited to a total of three(3) relevant experience projects. Recent experience means at least one project currently being performed or completed within three (3) years of the solicitation release date. Relevant in scope means a contract for custodial services, within Italy, similar to the performance-based requirements specified in Part 5 of the attached PWS. Relevant in magnitude means a recent contract that includes a yearly value of no less than Euro 250,000.00

If submitting more than one contract, the contracts cannot be combined, and each contract shall be recent and ($270,299.49).

relevant on its own.

2. Sub-Factor 2: Key Personnel

The Government will evaluate the Sub-factors on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In order to be determined acceptable in this evaluation factor, the Government will evaluate the quote to ensure that the following minimum requirements are met: all

i. The Quoter submitted a resume (in English) for the Project Manager/On-Site Manager. The resume shows evidence that the Project Manager/On-Site Manager has at least three (3) years of experience in facilities management and that he/she is able to speak, read and write in English, at least to fluency level 4 in accordance with paragraph 8.10 "TE-10 Language Fluency Clarification".

ii. The Quoter submitted a resume (in English) for the Quality Control Manager. The resume shows evidence that the Quality Control Manager has at least three (3) years of experience infacilities management and that he/she is able to speak, read and write in English, at least to fluency level 4 in accordance with paragraph 8.10 "TE-10 Language Fluency Clarification".

iii. The Quoter submitted a Letter of Commitment stating that the Project Manager/On-Site Manager will be available if the quoter is awarded the contract. Letters of Commitment are signed by both the quoter and the Project Manager/On-Site Manager and were provided on the quoter's official letterhead. Letter of Commitment is valid for not less than one year from the date of submission of the quote.

iv. The Quoter submitted a Letter of Commitment stating that the Quality Control Manager will be available if the quoter is awarded the contract. Letters of Commitment are signed by both the quoter and Quality Control Manager and were provided on the quoter's official letterhead. Letter of Commitment is valid for not less than one year from the date of submission of the quote.

C. Factor II - Past Performance

Evaluation: Past performance will be evaluated to determine if the quoter has performed favorably for previous contracts of a similar scope as the services required in this solicitation. The Government will evaluate a quoter's past performance to determine if past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (see below) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance. The quoter's past performance record must be determined to be acceptable in order to be considered for award. Quoter(s) must demonstrate successful past performance of the quoter as evidenced by information gathered concerning at least one (1) but NO than three (3) contracts and subcontracts that are recent (within the last three (3) years form the solicitation MORE release date) and relevant in scope and magnitude. If submitting more than one contract, the contracts cannot be combined, and each contract shall be recent and relevant on its own. Relevant in scope means a contract for custodial services, within Italy, similar to the performance-based requirements specified in Part 5 of the attached PWS. Relevant in magnitude means a contract that includes a yearly value of no less than 250,000 ($270,299.49).

Quoter(s) must submit the information as per Attachment 2 (Past Performance Questionnaire) for each of the contracts provided. If there are subcontractors or partnerships, they will be evaluated in the same manner as the Prime.

Past performance will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:

Ratin g

Description

Acce ptable

Based on the quoter's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort, or the quoter's performance record is unknown (see note below).

Unac cepta ble

Based on the quoter's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of a quoter without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the quote may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the quoter shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, an unknown rating shall be considered acceptable.

a. If the quoter is a Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile), past performance should be submitted for at least one (1)but no more than three (3) projects completed by the Joint Venture entity, within three

(3) years from the solicitation release date and that are for custodial services, within Italy, similar to the performance-based requirements specified in Part 5 of the attached PWS. Relevant in magnitude means a contract that includes a yearly value of no less than Euro 250,000 ($270,299.49). If submitting more than one contract, the contracts cannot be combined, and each contract shall be recent and relevant on its own. have such past If the Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile) does not performance, relevant and recent past performance shall be submitted for at least one partner.

b. In case of a Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile), all proposed partners will be assessed individually, and the results will then be assessed in their totality to derive the quoter's past/present performance.

c. The Government is not limited to Past Performance information submitted by Quoters in conducting Past Performance evaluations. The Government may consider past performance information from other sources such as: the offeror's former customers, business associates, federal, state, and local government agencies; the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases;

interviews with Program Managers and Contracting Officers.

d. Letters of commitment shall have been included for each firm comprising the Joint Venture (Consorzio Stabile) for their past performance to be considered.

e. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the quoter.

D. Factor III - Price (SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/STANDARD FORM 1449)

a. The Government will evaluate quotes using price analysis described in FAR 13.106-3 to ensure the price is fair and reasonable. Priced quotes should support the proposed Factors and Sub-factors and will be evaluated for total price, completeness, and reasonableness. The Quoter whose price is determined to be incomplete or unreasonable will not be considered for award.

b. The price quote will be evaluated but not rated. The individual CLINs will be totaled to determine the quoter's total proposed price. The quote will be reviewed to determine the reasonableness of price and the quoter's understanding of the work and ability to perform the PWS requirement.

Completeness: Pricing will be reviewed to determine if all price information requested by the solicitation has been submitted.

Reasonableness: The total evaluated price will be evaluated for reasonableness, defined as the degree to which the proposed prices compare to the prices a reasonably prudent person would expect to incur for the same or similar service.

c. The Government will evaluate Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs of the solicitation to ensure valid pricing was submitted for each field.

d. A price reasonableness approach will be utilized by the Government to determine that the proposed prices offered are fair and reasonable and that a "buy-in" or unbalanced pricing between CLINs or option periods is not occurring.

e. The base period and all option periods shall be included in the price calculation. Should the Government determine proposed prices are unrealistically low (an indication of "buy-in"), this will be considered a performance risk and may be deemed ineligible for contract award.

f. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding six (6) months of the quoter's final option period price to the quoter's total price.

g. An assessment of the reasonableness of each proposed price will be made. The Contracting Officer will perform a price analysis of each quote. Offerors are required to price the base and option periods.

Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential six (6) month extension of services period. The Government may choose to exercise the extension of services at the end of any performance period (base or option periods).

h. In evaluating price reasonableness, other than cost and pricing data shall be utilized.

KO DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING, UNIT 31423 BOX 77

APO, AE 09630

UNITED STATES

SONIA ZANOBINI, EMAIL: SONIA.ZANOBINI2.LN@ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: 314-645-8762

AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: