A02_-_SOW_-_APPENDIX_A_-_D3.pdf

Appendix A General Location Map

Appendix B Lake Shelbyville Project Map

APPENDIX C

LAKE SHELBYVILLE AREA TOWNSHIP ROAD COMMISIONERS (current list as award of contract this may change.)

Moultrie County Township Road Commissioners

ROAD DISTRICT Road Commissioners Name & Address Phone Number/Email

William (Bill) Richardson 217-874-2221 (w) DORA Box 3 doraroad@frontier.com

Dalton City 61925

Steve Chaney 217-752-6895 (w) EAST NELSON 104 Olive Street eastnelsontwnshp@consolidated.net

Allenville, IL 61951

Nick Grooms 217-543-2886 (w) JONATHAN CREEK 1501E CR 1700N jcreek@one-eleven.net

Sullivan 61951

Gary Ozier 217-873-4664 (w) LOVINGTON 314 N Washington lovingtontwp@one-eleven.net

Box 557 Lovington 61937

Andy Bernius 217-543-2524 (w) LOWE 2148 CR 1500E abernius@yahoo.com

Lovington 61937

Orville (Punch) Martin 217-665-3230 (w) MARROWBONE 1721 CR 400E punchmartin@yahoo.com

Bethany 61914

Rich Rutledge 217-728-7001 (w) SULLIVAN 518 S. Market Street sullivantwp17@gmail.com

Sullivan 61951

John Mowry 217-752-6711 (w) WHITLEY 1423 CR 550N whitleytownship@hotmail.com

Gays, IL 61928 mailto:doraroad@frontier.com mailto:eastnelsontwnshp@consolidated.net mailto:jcreek@one-eleven.net mailto:lovingtontwp@one-eleven.net mailto:abernius@yahoo.com mailto:punchmartin@yahoo.com mailto:sullivantwp17@gmail.com mailto:whitleytownship@hotmail.com

COUNTY ENGINEER Jeffrey Birch 217-728-4142 (w) 10 S Main 217-728-4746 (fax) Sullivan, IL 61951 217-620-5738 (c) jeffreybirch@moultrie.com

Technician Cameron Spesard cspesard@moultrie.com

Technician Kyle Steele kylesteele@moultrie.com

Shelby County Township Road Commissioners

ROAD DISTRICT Road Commissioners Name & Address Phone Number/Email

Brian Anderson 217-752-6812 Ash Grove 1051 Co. Hwy. 9 Windsor, IL 61957

Steve Lamar 217-895-5312 Big Spring 3428 E. 900 N. Rd.

Neoga , IL 62447

Dale Navis 217-774-5904 Clarksburg 1937 E. 800 N. Rd.

Clarksburg, IL

Donald Simpson 217-567-3509 Cold Spring 691 Co. Hwy. 15 Tower Hill, IL 62571

Lee Moffett 217-783-6326 Dry Point 1665 N. 305 E. Rd.

Cowden, IL 62422

Kevan Hennings 217-768-3994 Flat Branch 1140 E. 2500 N. Rd.

Assumption, IL 62510

Tony Smith 217-273-1587 Herrick 901 E. 100 N. Rd. (cell #) Herrick, IL 62431

Larry Syfert 217-259-9659 Holland 353 N. 2190 E. Rd. (cell #) Mode, IL 62444

Kendall Snyder 217-821-2605 mailto:jeffreybirch@moultrie.com mailto:cspesard@moultrie.com mailto:kylesteele@moultrie.com mailto:punchmartin@yahoo.com

Lakewood 680 N. 1650 E. Rd. (cell #) Lakewood, IL 62438

Appendix D-1

STANDARD TEST FOR GRADATION OF RIPRAP

Select a representative sample (Note No.1), weigh and dump on hard stand.

Select specific sizes (see example) on which to run “individual weight larger than” test. (See Note No. 2).

Procedure is similar to the standard aggregate gradation test for “individual weight retained.”

Determine the largest size stone in the sample. (100 percent size)

Separate by “size larger than” the selected weights, starting with the larger sizes. Use reference stones, with identified weights, for visual comparison in separating the obviously “larger than” stones. Stones that appear close to the specific weight must be individually weighed to determine size grouping. Weigh each size group, either individually or cumulatively.

Paragraph d above will result in “individual weight retained” figures. Calculate individual percent retained (heavier than), cumulative percent retained, and cumulative percent passing (lighter than). Plot percent passing, along with the specification curve on Eng Form 4055.

Notes

Sample Selection. The most important part of the test and least precise is the selection of a representative sample. NO “standard” can be devised; larger quarry run stone is best sampled at the shot or muck pile by given direction to the loader; small graded riprap is best sampled by random selection from the transporting vehicles. If possible, all parties should take part in the sample selection, and agree before the sample is run, that the sample is representative.

Selection of Size for Separation. It is quite possible and accurate to run a gradation using any convenient sizes for the separation, without reference to the specifications. After the test is plotted on a curve, the gradation limits may be plotted. Overlapping gradation with this method are no problem. It is usually more convenient, however, to select points form the gradation limits, such as the minimum 50 percent size, the minimum 15 percent size, and one or two others, as separation points.

APPENDIX D-2

Example Gradation

Specifications

Stone Weight in Lbs Percent Finer by Weight

400-160 100 160-80 5

Example Worksheet

Cumulative Cumulative Stone Size Individual Individual Percent Percent Lbs Wt Retained Percent Retained Retained Passing

400 0 0 - 100

160 9,600 30 30 70

80 11,200 35 65 35

20 8,000 25 90 10

30 3,200 10 100 - 32,000Lbs

NOTE:

Largest stone 251 lbs

APPENDIX D-3

GRADATION TEST DATA SHEET

Sample No. 1 ________________________

Type of Quarry___________________________ Stone Tested ________________________

Date of Test_______________________ Testing Rate ____________________Tons

Contractor________________________ Location ____________________________

TEST REPRESENTS

Contract No. District Tons

TOTAL

GRADATION

Stone Size Weight Individual Cumulative Specification (lbs) Retained % Retained % Ret. % Pass % Finer by wt

Total Weight

Remarks________________________________________________________________

I certify that the above sample is representative of the total tonnage covered by this test report

Contractor Representative______________________________________________________

Government Representative_____________________________________________________