AMENDMENT_0001_MCCOOK_GFI_STORAGE_W912P614R0031.pdf

W81G66

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SUBJECT: W912P6-14-R-0031, TRANSPORTATION, STORAGE AND INCIDENTAL WORK INVOLVING INSPECTION OF McCOOK MAIN

TUNNEL SYSTEM - MAIN GATES & EQUIPMENT (GOVERNMENT FURNISHED ITEMS (GFI))

-- UNDER THIS AMENDMENT 0001, THE GOVERNMENT IS FURNISHING AND INCORPORATING ATTACHMENTS 1 THROUGH 3 INTO THE PROPOSAL PACKAGE THAT WERE INADVERTENTLY OMITTED WHEN THE SOLICITATION WAS PUBLISHED AT FBO.GOV ON 22

SEPTEMBER 2014.

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THIS AMENDMENT REVISES VARIOUS AREAS OF THE SOLICITATION AS DESCRIBED HEREUNDER ---- SEE

THE FOLLOWING PAGES --

THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE REMAINS UNCHANGED BY THIS AMENDMENT; THEREFORE, PROPOSALS ARE DUE NO LATER THAN 4:00 P.M.

CST ON 2 OCTOBER 2014. POINT OF CONTACT: MS. BEARD AT 312-846-5378 OR MR. HERMSEN AT 312-846-5376.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-Sep-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912P6-14-R-0031

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Sep-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-Sep-2014

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, CHICAGO

231 SOUTH LASALLE STREET SUITE 1500

CHICAGO IL 60604-1437

W912P6 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912P6-14-R-0031

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

AMENDMENT PARTICULARS:

A. Section A of the Solicitation Document has been revised as follows:

(1) The Chicago District’s address is changed at Section A. Therefore the following and relevant paragraph is revised to read as follows: INTRODUCTION OF REQUIREMENT: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District Office, located at 231 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1500, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is seeking proposals for the aforementioned project to perform the following Scope of Services.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The Issued By organization has changed from

CONTRACTING DIVISION, CHICAGO DISTRICT

111 N CANAL STREET

CHICAGO IL 60606-

to

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, CHICAGO

231 SOUTH LASALLE STREET SUITE 1500

CHICAGO IL 60604-1437

(2) Paragraph F, has been revised to read as follows:

F. BASIS FOR AWARD: Subject to the provisions contained herein, award will be made to one (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, who conforms to the solicitation requirements, and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, provides the best value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer. The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers. The basis of award will be a conforming offer, the price or cost of which may or may not be the lowest. If other than the lowest offer, it must be sufficiently more advantageous than the lowest offer to justify the payment of additional amounts. Any award price must be determined to be fair and reasonable. SEE

SECTION M FOR THE EVALUATION CRITERIA.

B. Section M of the Solicitation Document has been revised to replace the evaluation criteria and basis for award provided at Clause 52.212‐2. Therefore, the provisions set forth below replaces those previously issued under the Solicitation.

52.212‐2 EVALUATION‐‐COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. RATING SYSTEM: Through use of the best value method of contracting, using the source selection trade off process, the USACE‐Chicago District seeks to acquire the services described in this solicitation and its accompanying documents. This particular acquisition method considers award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. In addition, this process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non‐cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. THE BELOW RATING ADJECTIVES WILL

BE APPLIED TO EVALUATE TECHNICAL FACTORS A THROUGH H:

Outstanding: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good: Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal: Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.

Proposal is unawardable.

2. EVALUATION SYSTEM: The evaluation process essentially consists of the following: 1) Proposal compliance review, 2) technical evaluation, 3) price evaluation, and 4) price technical trade‐off analysis. An evaluation team will evaluate each contractor’s submittals in response to this Request for Proposals.

Submittals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein. The technical and non‐technical aspects of each submittal will be evaluated. ‐ RELATIVE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE: All non‐price evaluation factors are equal, when combined, are more important than price.

(i) COMPLIANCE REVIEW. The Contract Specialist or designee will make an initial review of each submittal to look for submittal information, apparent errors, omissions and areas that require clarification.

Thereafter, the findings will be submitted to the Contracting Officer for review. This information will state the specific nature of the question and the page and paragraph of the submittal requiring correction or clarification. The Contracting Officer will review the findings and, if considered appropriate, task the Contract Specialist to submit questions to the Offerors for a quick response to the Contracting Officer. The Contract Specialist will not cite apparent deficiencies (parts of the submittal that fail to meet the Government’s requirements). The submittals will not be evaluated at that time. The purpose of this preliminary review session is to eliminate minor irregularities or apparent clerical mistakes. This preliminary evaluation will assure that each submittal contains the required documentation/forms/pricing and certifications called out in the RFP.

(ii) TECHNICAL/SUBMITTAL EVALUATION. Offerors passing through the compliance review, will have each of their submittal items evaluated using the aforementioned rating system.

(iii) PAST PERFORMANCE. The offeror shall provide a listing of three relevant projects, with detailed project description of each, along with a Point of Contact Name and Telephone Number. A minimum of 2 references will be interviewed and requested to provide a rating based on the Offeror’s: a) Quality of Work; b)

Timely Performance; c) Effectiveness of Management; d) Compliance with Safety Standards; and e) Compliance with Labor Standards.

(iv) PRICE EVALUATION: Price analysis will be used to determine the total evaluated price to support the selection of the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror. Unbalancing of line items will be checked.

3 . REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: Offerors shall provide the following materials in binders with a table of contents and tabbed Section dividers. Each Section submitted must be parallel with the submission requirements identified below. The documents required by Tab 5 shall be submitted in originals only and shall be placed in a clearly marked envelope. All information requested for Tab’s 1 through 5 must be submitted for the proposal to be considered responsive to the Solicitation.

Tab 1: TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS “A” THROUGH “E:”

For Technical Evaluation Factors “A” through “E,” the offeror must provide written documentation demonstrating its ability to provide a storage facility that meets or exceeds the following minimum requirements for GFI storage as described at Technical Evaluation Factors A through E. A proposal receiving a rating that’s less than acceptable for any one of the Technical Evaluation Factors A through E will be rejected and ineligible for award. Therefore, a proposals cannot move forward in the evaluation process should the offeror’s proposal receive an unacceptable rating for any one of the Factors A through E.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR A: Indoor: 6,000 contiguous square feet to be dedicated solely to the storage of the cylinders and hydraulic power units.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR B: Indoor: 16,000 contiguous square feet to be dedicated solely to the gates and appurtenances.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR C: Doors: one (1) 16' X 16'

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR D: Internal clear height: 16'

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR E: Capable of maintaining relative humidity <70% and temperature >41° fahrenheight.

Tab 2: TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS “F” THROUGH “H:”

For Technical Evaluation Factors “F” through “H,” the offeror must provide written documentation or any submittal requested therein demonstrating its ability to meet the requirements contained described at Technical Evaluation Factors “F” through “H.”

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR F: Describe the overall security system of the storage facility and/or surrounding grounds by addressing each of the following: (i) the means of securing entrances (e.g. warehouse doors, gates, etc.), (ii) of the surveillance system (e.g. CCTV camera), and (iii) of the intrusion detection system. Failure to address any subpart will result in the assumption that the system does not exist. Photos are acceptable as part of narrative.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR G: Fire alarm / fire suppression system used at proposed storage facility.

Photos are acceptable as part of narrative.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR H: Provide resume (at least one) of a handling / shipping specialist. The specialist may be an employee of the Contractor or may be an outside consultant. The specialist must be experienced in packaging, picking, handling and transporting large fabricated items. Resumes that offer more experience in the above will be considered more favorably.

What qualifies as Acceptable: At a minimum, the Contractor has provided complete information called out in the Technical Evaluation factors.

What is considered Unacceptable: Incomplete description/details (totally absent or required/key elements not spoken to). Submittal item clearly does not meet requirements of the Statement of Work, and has not demonstrated an understanding of the government’s requirements.

Tab 3: PRICE PROPOSAL: Section B of the Solicitation document (Bid Schedule): The offeror shall fully complete the Bid Schedule, ensuring that it provides a price for all line items. The fully completed Bid Schedule serves as the offeror's “Price” Proposal.

Tab 4: PAST PERFORMANCE: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE/INFORMATION ‐ The offeror shall provide a listing of three relevant projects, with detailed project description of each, along with a Point of Contact Name and Telephone Number. A minimum of 2 references will be interviewed and requested to provide a rating based on the Offeror’s: a) Quality of Work; b) Timely Performance; c) Effectiveness of Management; d) Compliance with Safety Standards; and e) Compliance with Labor Standards. In lieu of providing a list of relevant projects, Offerors who have sufficient ratings in the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) may provide copies of their most recent ratings for evaluation by the Source Selection Evaluation Team.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS:

Acceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability.

PAST PERFORMANCE RISK ASSESSMENT:

LOW RISK – Based on offeror’s past performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

MODERATE RISK – Based on the offeror’s past performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror willsuccessfully perform the required effort.

HIGH RISK – Based on the offeror’s past performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNKNOWN RISK – No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the offeror or key team members/subcontractors or their key personnel. This is neither a negative or positive assessment.

Tab 5: SIGNED PROPOSAL, Representations and Certifications, and any Amendments:

SF 1449 ‐ return Page 1 with Blocks 30a, 30b and 30c completed by an authorized person from the company or joint venture.

Section K of the Solicitation document (Representations and Certifications): The offeror must complete and submit the Representations and Certifications contained in Section K of this Solicitation.

Amendments: Any Amendments issued against this Solicitation shall be acknowledged on a SF 30.

4. BASIS FOR AWARD.

Subject to the provisions contained herein, award will be made to one (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, who conforms to the solicitation requirements, and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, provides the best value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer. The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers. The basis of award will be a conforming offer, the price or cost of which may or may not be the lowest. If other than the lowest offer, it must be sufficiently more advantageous than the lowest offer to justify the payment of additional amounts. Any award price must be determined to be fair and reasonable.

The Government intends to award a contract without discussions based on initial proposals received;

therefore, the proposals shall contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost and technical standpoint.

However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions in accordance with FAR 52.215‐1.

Should discussions be necessary after evaluations, the Government will establish a competitive range of the Offerors that are the most highly rated. The Government reserves the right to seek clarification in the proposals.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

C. Section B – the Bid Schedule makes the following changes. A revised Bid Schedule is enclosed herein and shall be replaced with the previously issued schedule. Contractor’s shall furnish their prices on this Revised Bid Schedule.

CLIN 0001

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 9.00 from 10.00 to 1.00.

The unit of issue has changed from Months to Job.

CLIN 0002

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 9.00 from 1.00 to 10.00.

The unit of issue has changed from Job to Months.

REVISED BID SCHEDULE

(AMENDMENT 0001)

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Transportation of GFI Bundles

FFP

By this Line Item 0001, the Contractor shall provide Transportation of GFI Bundles #1 through #10 in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth under the Statement of Work - SEE Section C.

Payment will be made for costs associated with all Transportation of Operating Equipment - Main & Guard Gates, including Hydraulic Cylinders, Hydraulic Power Units, and Valve Manifold Assemblies from existing storage facility to new storage facility, including but not limited to;

transportation and setting up of cribbing or other temporary supports;

handling; securing; insurance; and any other measures or materials to transport the Operating Equipment to storage facility without damage, deterioration, or loss during the transportation.

FOB: Contractor Facility

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: W81G66

NET AMT

0002 10 Months Storage and Inspection for GFI Bundles

FFP

By this Line Item 0002, the Contractor shall provide Storage and Inspection for GFI Bundles #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8 in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the enclosed Statement of Work - SEE Section C.

Payment will be made for costs associated with storage of Gates, Embedments, and Auxiliary Components, including but not limited to; storage facility; cribbing or other temporary supports;

handling; securing; insurance; incidental work involving maintenance during Storage of Gates, Embedments, and Auxiliary Components; and any other measures or materials to protect the Gates, Embedments, and Auxiliary Components from damage, deterioration, or loss during the storage period. If the actual cost of storage is less than the line item amount, the contract will be modified to adjust the line item accordingly.

The measured duration of storage will be in calendar months. Partial months at the beginning and end of the storage period will be counted as complete months.

0003 24 Months Storage and Inspection for GFI Bundles

FFP

By this Line Item 0003, the Contractor shall provide Storage and Inspection for GFI Bundles #2, #9 and #10 as delineated in the enclosed Statement of Work - SEE Section C.

Payment will be made for costs associated with storage of Operating Equipment - Main & Guard Gates, including Hydraulic Cylinders, Hydraulic Power Units, Valve Manifold Assemblies, and including but not limited to; storage facility; cribbing or other temporary supports; handling; securing; insurance; incidental work involving maintenance during Storage of Hydraulic Cylinders; inspection of the cylinders at regular intervals; and any other measures or materials to protect the cylinders or other operating equipment from damage, deterioration, or loss during the storage period. If the actual cost of storage is less than the line item amount, the contract will be modified to adjust the line item accordingly.

The measured duration of storage will be in calendar months. Partial months at the beginning and end of the storage period will be counted as complete months.

TOTAL PROPOSED AMOUNT: $____________________________

Table 1 Delivery Bundle 1: Vertical Lift Gates

Total Pieces

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

Main Gate Leaf Assembly

2 110A Main Gate Section 1 Assembly 85000 22.5 x 3.5 x 11

2 120A Main Gate Section 2 Assembly 81000 22 x 3.5 x 10

2 130A Main Gate Section 3 Assembly 85000 22.5 x 3.5 x 15

8 230A Cover Plate 150 1.7 x 1.5 x 1 inch

4 230B Cover Plate 210 2.5 x 1.5 x 1 inch

8 230D Cover Plate 350 4.5 x 1.5 x 1 inch

32 290B Keeper Plate 12

64 291A Washer 160 (total)

64 291B Washer 320 (total)

32 292A Link Plate 220 3 x 1.5 x 1.75 inch

32 a10 HB 7/8”‐9 UNC 2A x 8 1/2”

32 b10 HN 7/8”‐9 UNC 2B

32 c10 FW 7/8”

432 d10 FGS 1/2"‐13 UNC 2A x 1 3/4”

Guard Gate Leaf Assembly

4 140A Guard Gate Section 1 Assembly 84000 21 x 3.5 x 11

4 150A Guard Gate Section 2 Assembly 77000 20 x 3.5 x 10

4 160A Guard Gate Section 3 Assembly 84000 21 x 3.5 x 15

16 230A Cover Plate 150 1.7 x 1.5 x 1 inch

8 230B Cover Plate 210 2.5 x 1.5 x 1 inch

16 230C Cover Plate 350 3.5 x 1.5 x 1 inch

64 290B Keeper Plate 12

128 291A Washer 320 (total)

128 291B Washer 640 (total)

64 292A Link Plate 220 3 x 1.5 x 1.75 inch

64 a10 HB 7/8”‐9 UNC 2A x 8 1/2”

64 b10 HN 7/8”‐9 UNC 2B

64 c10 FW 7/8”

800 d10 FGS 1/2"‐13 UNC 2A x 1 3/4”

Delivery Bundle 2: Seals

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

2 310A Main Gate Section 1 Seal

2 311A Main Gate Section 2 Seal

2 312A Main Gate Section 3 Seal

4 313A Guard Gate Section 1 Seal

4 314A Guard Gate Section 2 Seal

4 315A Guard Gate Section 3 Seal

Delivery Bundle 3: Gate Sill Embeds

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

4 101A Seal Plate 4100 21.5 x 6 x 1 inch

4 101B Seal Plate 1900 21.5 x 3 x 1 inch

144 101C Grout Cover 14 8 inch dia x 1 inch

2 102A Seal Plate 4400 23.5 x 6 x 1 inch

2 102B Seal Plate 2000 23.5 x 3 x 1 inch

4 103A Seal Plate Beam 1400 22 x 1 x 1

2 103B Seal Plate Beam 2700 23.5 x 1 x 1

4 104A Seal Plate Beam 900 22 x 1 x 1

2 104B Seal Plate Beam 1000 23.5 x 1 x 1

376 511E 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 600 (total) 8 inch Long

Delivery Bundle 4: Gate Wheel Guide Embeds

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

D/S Blockout Field Assembly

2 113A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 114A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 119A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 120A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 125A Blockout Assembly 27000 5.5 x 4 x 22

2 126A Blockout Assembly 27000 5.5 x 4 x 22

4 335A 2” Wheel Track Plate 1550

4 335B 2” Wheel Track Plate 1550

4 336A 2 1/8” Wheel Track Plate 1600

4 336B 2 1/8” Wheel Track Plate 1600

4 339A 1” Roller Track Plate 850

4 339B 1” Roller Track Plate 850

248 511A 3/4" Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 600 (total) 1.4 Long

248 511B 3/4" Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 900 (total) 2.1 Long

248 511C 3/4" Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 750 (total) 1.6 Long

112 12A HHB 3/4”‐10 UNC x 2 1/4”

128 12C HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

128 12D HW 3/4"

392 12E SHS 3/4"‐10 UNC x 3 1/4"

208 12F SHS 5/8”‐11 UNC x 2 1/4"

208 14G HHN 5/8”‐11 UNC

200 14K HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

Main Blockout Field Assembly

2 111A Blockout Assembly 39000 5 x 6.5 x 20

2 112A Blockout Assembly 39000 5 x 6.5 x 20

2 117A Blockout Assembly 34000 5 x 6.5 x 20

2 118A Blockout Assembly 34000 5 x 6.5 x 20

2 123A Blockout Assembly 33000 5 x 6.5 x 23

2 124A Blockout Assembly 33000 5 x 6.5 x 23

4 334A 2 1/8” Wheel Track Plate 1600

4 334B 2 1/8” Wheel Track Plate 1600

4 335A 2” Wheel Track Plate 1550

4 335B 2” Wheel Track Plate 1550

4 339A 1” Roller Track Plate 850

4 339B 1” Roller Track Plate 850

496 511A 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 1000 (total) 1.4 Long

248 511B 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 900 (total) 2.1 Long

248 511C 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 750 (total) 1.6 Long

160 13A HHB 3/4”‐10 UNC x 2 1/4”

160 13C HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

160 13D HW 3/4"

392 13E SHS 3/4"‐10 UNC x 3 1/4”

208 13F SHS 5/8”‐11 UNC x 2 1/4"

208 13G HHN 5/8”‐11 UNC

U/S Blockout Field Assembly

2 115A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 116A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 121A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 122A Blockout Assembly 24000 5.5 x 4 x 20

2 125A Blockout Assembly 27000 5.5 x 4 x 22

2 126A Blockout Assembly 27000 5.5 x 4 x 22

4 335A 2” Wheel Track Plate 1550

4 335B 2” Wheel Track Plate 1550

4 336A 2 1/8” Wheel Track Plate 1600

4 336B 2 1/8” Wheel Track Plate 1600

4 339A 1” Roller Track Plate 850

4 339B 1” Roller Track Plate 850

248 511A 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 600 (total) 1.4 Long

248 511B 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 900 (total) 2.1 Long

248 511C 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 750 (total) 1.6 Long

128 14A HHB 3/4”‐10 UNC x 2 1/4”

128 14C HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

128 14D HW 3/4"

392 14E SHS 3/4"‐10 UNC x 3 1/4”

208 14F SHS 5/8”‐11 UNC x 2 1/4"

Delivery Bundle 5: Gate Seal Lintel Beams

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

6 105A Lintel Assembly 2250 15 x 0.6 x 3.1

84 511C 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 250 (total) 1.6 Long

42 511D 3/4” Dia Anchor Rod Assembly 75 (total) 1.0 Long

8 12B HHB 3/4”‐10 UNC x 2 1/4”

8 12C HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

8 12D HW 3/4"

8 13B HHB 3/4”‐10 UNC x 3 1/2”

8 13C HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

8 13D HW 3/4"

8 14B HHB 3/4”‐10 UNC x 3 1/2”

8 14C HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

8 14D HW 3/4"

Delivery Bundle 6: Anchor Rods for Cylinder Support Beams and Dogging Devices

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

144 509A Anchor Rod Assembly 2600 (total) 2.2 Long

144 509B Anchor Rod Assembly 1450 (each) 10.2 Long

24 509C Template 25 20 x 10 (inches)

24 509D Template 60 26 x 18 (inches)

Delivery Bundle 7: Connecting Pins

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

32 290A Link Pin 90 1 x 0.7 x 0.7

64 290A Link Pin 90 1 x 0.7 x 0.7

Delivery Bundle 8: Cylinder Support Beams

Piece Mark

Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

12 504A Beam Assembly 11000 22 x 2 x 4

6 501A Cylinder Support 26000 13 x 8.5 x 4

24 507A Dogging Device 350 3.1 x 1 x 1

288 10A HHB 1 1/2"‐6 UNC x 6”

288 10B HHN 1 1/2"‐6 UNC

288 10C HW 1 1/2"

208 12G HHN 5/8”‐11 UNC

200 12K HHN 3/4"‐10 UNC

Delivery Bundle 9: Hydraulic Cylinders

Piece Mark Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

6 No. 3‐143645 Hydraulic Cylinder 96200 49 x 5 x 7.5

6 Part No. HM17‐1X/400‐ C/V/0400bar/4‐20mA

Pressure Transducer and Cabling

Delivery Bundle 10: Hydraulic Power Units

Piece Mark Description Weight (lbs per piece)

Volume (L x W x H, ft)

2 43AHAG‐14575‐0‐D Hydraulic Power Unit

2 RFDBN/HC660DAN10D1/\.X/16‐

L115

Boxes with 2‐filter clogging indicators (1 box per power unit located next to tank top mounted duplex filter assembly

Figure 1: Shipping/Handling Brace Detail