W912P521R0009_final.pdf

W38XDD21105662

PROJECT TITLE: Center Hill Dam Spillw ay Gates & Machinery Replacement Project near Lancaster, Tennessee

TYPE OF CONTRACT: Firm Fixed-Price Construction Contract

DISCLOSURE OF MAGNITUDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: Betw een $25,000,000 and $100,000,000

NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE: 237990 - Other Heavy and Civil Engineering

SIZE STANDARD: $39,500,000

TYPE OF SET ASIDE: This is a full and open procurement. In accordance w tih Federal Acquisition Regulation 19.1307, this project requires the HUBZone 10% price evaluation.

Proposals received via Email or Facsimile w ill not be considered.

Government w ill not reimburse Offerors for any effort expended in responding to this request for proposal.

SAMANTHA HARRISON 615 736 2020

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

25-May-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________2237 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________FAR 52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________07 Jul 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CELRN-RC-N

DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING

110 9TH AVENUE SOUTH, RM A680

NASHVILLE TN 37203

W912P5

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

01:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

615-736-7124FAX:TEL: 615-736-7932 TEL: FAX:

W912P521R0009 80

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

W912P521R0009

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE

PRICE SCHEDULE

W912P521R0009 – Center Hill Dam Spillway Gates and Machinery Replacement Project near Lancaster, TN

*An electronic Price Schedule is provided as a separate document in excel format titled “CEN Spillway Gates Price

Schedule.xlxs” and may be submitted with the Offeror’s Price Proposal.*

ITEM

NO.

DESCRIPTION SPEC.

SECTION

EST.

QTY.

UNIT ESTIMATED

AMOUNT

0001 Mobilization 01 14 00 1 JOB $ -

0002 Demobilization 01 14 00 1 JOB $ -

GATE 01

0003 Gate 01 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0004 Gate 01 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0005 Gate 01 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0006 Gate 01 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0007 Gate 01 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 02

0008 Gate 02 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0009 Gate 02 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0010 Gate 02 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0011 Gate 02 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0012 Gate 02 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 03

0013 Gate 03 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0014 Gate 03 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0015 Gate 03 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0016 Gate 03 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0017 Gate 03 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 04

0018 Gate 04 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0019 Gate 04 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0020 Gate 04 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0021 Gate 04 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0022 Gate 04 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 05

0023 Gate 05 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0024 Gate 05 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0025 Gate 05 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0026 Gate 05 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0027 Gate 05 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 06

0028 Gate 06 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0029 Gate 06 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0030 Gate 06 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0031 Gate 06 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0032 Gate 06 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 07

0033 Gate 07 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0034 Gate 07 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0035 Gate 07 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0036 Gate 07 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0037 Gate 07 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

GATE 08

0038 Gate 08 - Fabrication and Delivery 05 59 00 1 JOB $ -

0039 Gate 08 - Removal and Installation 02 41 00 1 JOB $ -

0040 Gate 08 - Lifting Machinery Equipment and Delivery

35 20 16 1 JOB $ -

0041 Gate 08 - Lifting Machinery Equipment Removal and Installation

0042 Gate 08 - Electrical Removal and Installation 26 05 26 1 JOB $ -

TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT: $ -

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Center Hill Dam Spillway Gates

FFP

Center Hill Dam Spillway Gates and Machinery Replacement Project near Lancaster, Tennessee in accordance with the technical specifications and plans.

NOTE: This CLIN includes the total for all price schedule line items.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: W38XDD21105662

PSC CD: Z2KA

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 2237 dys. ANP 1 MID CUMBERLAND, CENTER HILL

RESOURE/LAKE

JACQUELINE HUFF

158 RESOURCE LANE

LANCASTER TN 38569-9410

865-337-5955 EXT 5901

FOB: Destination

W912P5

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1.1 Intent

This solicitation is to award one (1) construction contract for the Center Hill Spillway Gates and Machinery Replacement Project near Lancaster, Tennessee.

1.2 Project Description

The scope of this requirement is to fabricate and install eight (8) spillway tainter gates and machinery equipment at Center Hill Dam, Lancaster, Tennessee.

1.3 Disclosure of Magnitude of Construction Project

The estimated magnitude of this requirement is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

1.4 Basis of Award

The award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government with appropriate consideration given to the six (6) evaluation factors: Past Performance; Scheduling Approach; Safety Management; Economy and Efficiency; Small Business Participation Plan; and Price. Factors are listed in descending order of importance. NOTE: When combined, the non-cost/price factors (Past Performance; Scheduling Approach; Safety Management; Economy and Efficiency; and Small Business Participation Plan) are APPROXIMATELY EQUAL to Price. Factors are illustrated:

Factor I – Past Performance 1st Factor II – Scheduling Approach 2nd Factor III – Safety Management 3rd Factor IV – Economy and Efficiency 4th Factor V – Small Business Participation Plan 5th Factor VI - Price

Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to assume they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer.

Proposals are intended to be evaluated and an award made without discussions with Offerors unless discussions are determined to be necessary. Additionally, any other than small business Offeror must have an acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan to receive an award in accordance with FAR 19.702(a).

Offerors are cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offered.

1.5 Type of Contract

The Government intends to award one (1) firm fixed-price construction contract.

1.6 Who May Submit

This procurement is unrestricted to obtain full and open competition. Proposals from firms organized as joint ventures (JV) that have associated specifically for this project must include a copy of the legal joint venture agreement in the proposal submission.

1.7 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and Small Business Size Standard

The NAICS code for this project is 237990, entitled “Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction”, which has a Small Business Administration (SBA) size standard of $39.5 Million.

1.8 Availability of Plans (Drawings), Technical Specifications and Additional Documents

All drawings, technical specifications, and additional documents relating to this Request for Proposal (RFP) are available for download at this solicitation posting on the SAM website, www.SAM.gov. No printed copies of the aforementioned documents will be provided by the Government. Although provided as separate attachments, the following documents are considered an official part of the solicitation.

The Specifications and Drawings are part of the contract and shall be considered in that respect (see Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.236-7001, Contract Drawings and Specifications).

1.9 Pre-Proposal Site Visit

Pursuant to the Pre-Solicitation Notice, a site visit was held on 18 May 2022 at Center Hill Dam in Lancaster, TN.

Offerors inspected the job site and acquainted themselves with the nature and location of the work, as well as the general and local conditions that can affect the work or the cost thereof. Offerors that did not attend the site visit will not be relieved of the responsibility of properly estimating the difficulty or cost of successfully performing the work.

The Government assumes no responsibility for any understanding or representations concerning conditions made by any of its officers, agents or employees, unless included in the solicitation, the specifications or related documents

A Pre-Proposal Conference will be held on 26 May 2022 via Webex. Please refer to FAR 52.236-27 Alt 1, Site Visit (Construction), incorporated by full text in this solicitation, for information pertaining to the scheduled site visit and Pre-Proposal Conference.

This was the only site visit for this project. If you missed the scheduled site visit, no other arrangements will be made due to personnel and time restrictions.

1.10 Requirements to Attend the Site Visit

REGISTRATION: Only registered persons will be permitted to attend the site visit. In addition to the information below, please also provide your firm’s name, firm’s CAGE and/or Unique Entity Identifier (known as DUNS) number, and name and position title of primary point-of-contact and their telephone number and email address.

Only two (2) individuals from each business entity will be permitted to attend.

U.S. CITIZENS: To register, U.S. citizens interested in attending the site visit shall submit a Nashville District Corps of Engineers (LRN) U.S. Citizen Security Access Form to the LRN Point of Contacts (POCs), Contract Specialist Samantha (Dani) Harrison and Contracting Officer Stacy Wiggins, no later than five (5) business days prior to the site visit. If submitting the document in less than five business (5) days prior, the person may not receive approval for participation. Notification of approval or denial will be provided prior to the date of the site visit. The form and guidance is available as a pdf attachment on http://sam.gov with this solicitation and is titled U.S. Citizen Security Access Form.

FOREIGN NATIONALS (FNs): All non-U.S. Citizens, including permanent residents wishing to attend the site visit must be approved in advance. FNs wishing to attend a site visit shall submit a completed Nashville District Corps of Engineers Foreign National Security Access Form and legible color copies of two (2) of the following documents: Passport (unexpired or expired), Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (INS Form N-560 04 N-561), Certificate of Naturalization (INS Form N-550 or N-570), unexpired foreign Passport with I-551 stamp or attached INS Form I-

94 indicating unexpired employment authorization, an Alien Registration Receipt Card with photo (INS Form I-151 or I-551), unexpired Temporary Resident Card (INS Form I-688), unexpired Employment Authorization Card (INS Form I- 688A), unexpired Reentry Permit (INS Form I-327), unexpired Refugee Travel Document (INS Form I- 571), or unexpired Employment Authorization Documentation issued by the INS which contains a photograph (INS Form I-688B) to the LRN POCs. These documents must be submitted two (2) weeks prior to the site visit. FN requests require approval at the Headquarters U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQ USACE) level. Exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis but will be limited. The form is available as a pdf attachment on www.sam.gov with this solicitation and is titled Foreign National Security Access Form.

LRN POCs for Registration: For questions and/or concerns regarding the Site Visit, please contact Samantha (Dani) Harrison at Samantha.D.Harrison@usace.army.mil. Please submit all site visit request forms to Samantha

(Dani) Harrison at Samantha.D.Harrison@usace.army.mil and Stacy Wiggins at

Stacy.S.Wiggins@usace.army.mil. When you send your site visit request form, please put “W912P521R0009 - (Foreign National or U.S. Citizen) Request Form-(Your Company Name)” in the subject line of the email. Please edit the information in parenthesis to match the request form you submit and your company name.

1.11 POC for Communication: Any communications regarding this procurement must be made in writing to the Nashville Contracting Branch, Attn: Samantha (Dani) Harrison via email at Samantha.D.Harrison@usace.army.mil.

Inquiries must identify the solicitation number, the requestor’s company name, address, email address, telephone, and facsimile numbers to include area code.

Phone calls or requests to arrange meetings at the Nashville District during the solicitation period to discuss project requirements or company’s capabilities are highly discouraged and will not be scheduled.

1.12 Prospective Offerors’ Questions and Requests for Information

Prospective Offerors should submit questions concerning this Solicitation through the Bidder Inquiry function in ProjNet at http://www.ProjNet.org/ProjNet. This is USACE’s standard platform for receiving and responding to questions and requests for information. As noted below, Offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet.

Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the provisions stated in the Solicitation.

To submit and review inquiry items, Offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system.

Instructions to gain access are listed below.

Project: (Center Hill Dam) Tainter Gate Replacement Solicitation Number: W912P521R0009 The Bidder Inquiry Key: BHNNX7-EABQD2

Instructions for ProjNet Bidder Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

5. Select Continue. A page will then open stating a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Select Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Instructions for Future ProjNet Bidder Inquiry Access:

1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be emailed any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.

2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

6. Select Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.

7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

From this page you may view all inquiries or add an inquiry. Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by LRN’s technical team.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety and to review the “Bidder Inquiry System” for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

NOTES:

1. Offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet, but in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation. Any questions regarding acceptable means of submitting offers shall be made directly to the Contract Specialist identified in the solicitation.

2. Government responses to questions from prospective Offerors concerning the Solicitation that are submitted to ProjNet in accordance with the procedures above are not binding on the Government unless an amendment is issued on Standard Form 30. In the case of any conflicts, the Solicitation governs. Any changes or revisions to the Solicitation will be made by formal amendment. Government responses will be limited to: (a) Notice that an amendment will be issued; (b) Reference to an existing requirement contained in the Solicitation; or (c) Notice that a response is not necessary.

3. The ability for prospective Offerors to enter questions in reference to the Solicitation will be disabled ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date stated in the Solicitation. No Government responses will be entered into the ProjNet system within five (5) calendar days prior to the closing date stated in the Solicitation.

1.13 Amendments Prior to Date Submission for Request for Proposals (RFP). The right is reserved as the interest of the Government may require, to revise or amend the specifications or drawings or both prior to the date set for submission of proposals. Such revisions and amendments, if any will be announced by an amendment or amendments to this RFP. If the revisions and amendments are of a nature which requires material changes in quantities or prices proposed or both, the date set for receipt of proposals may be postponed by such number of days as in the opinion of the issuing Contracting Officer will enable Offerors to revise their proposal. In such cases, the amendment will include an announcement of the new date for receipt of proposal.

1.14 Notice to Offeror: Use of Class I Ozone-Depleting Substances

a. In accordance with Section 326 of P.L. 102-484, the Government is prohibited from awarding any contract which includes a specification or standard that requires the use of a Class I ozone depleting substance (ODS) identified in Section 601(a) of the Clean Air Act, (42 U.S.C 767a(a)), or that can be met only through the use of such a substance unless such use has been approved, on an individual basis, by a senior acquisitions official who determines that there is no suitable substitute available.

b. To comply with this statute, the Government has conducted a best effort screening of the specifications and standards associated with this acquisition to determine whether they contain any ODS requirements. This requirement has no relationship to ODSs.

c. If the Offeror possesses any special knowledge about any other ODSs required directly or indirectly at any level of contract performance, the U.S. Army would appreciate if such information were surfaced to the Contracting

Officer for appropriate action. To preclude delay to the procurement, the Offeror should provide any information as soon as possible after release of this RFP and prior to the submission of proposals to the extent practicable. It should be understood that there is no obligation on the Offeror to comply with the request and that no compensation can be provided for doing so.

2.0 BONDS AND INSURANCE

2.1 BID GUARANTEE. All Offerors shall furnish a bid guarantee. In accordance with FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, the bidder (or Offeror for this solicitation) shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond (use Standard Form 24) supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier’s check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States. The bid guarantee amount shall be at least 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3,000,000.00. If using a Bid Bond, it must be submitted on SF 24. The SF 24 can be found at the GSA Forms Library at https://www.gsa.gov/forms.

2.2 INSURANCE. Contractor shall carry Liability and Insurance. See FAR 52.228-5, Insurance – Liability to Third Persons.

2.3 The successful Offeror will, within the time established in the proposal, furnish performance and payment bonds in the amounts indicated in the RFP or the specifications.

a. PERFORMANCE BONDS (Standard Form (SF) 25). Pursuant to FAR 52.228-15, Performance and Payment Bonds—Construction (DEVIATION 2020-O0016), the penal amount of the performance bond shall equal one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price. Bonds shall be received on a SF 25A within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of contract award. The SF 25A can be found at the GSA Forms Library at https://www.gsa.gov/forms.

b. PAYMENT BONDS (SF 25A). Pursuant to FAR 52.228-15, Performance and Payment Bonds— Construction (DEVIATION 2020-O0016), the penal amount of the payment bond shall equal one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price. Bonds shall be received on a SF 25A within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of contract award. The SF 25A can be found at the GSA Forms Library at https://www.gsa.gov/forms.

3.0 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)

In accordance with FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management, registration is required in the System for Award Management (SAM) database located at www.sam.gov. More specifically, "An Offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer or quotation, and shall continue to be registered until time of award, during performance, and through final payment of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchasing agreement resulting from this solicitation." (See FAR 52.204-7(b)(1)).

For SAM Customer Service, contact:

Federal Service Desk URL: www.fsd.gov Hours: 8am – 8pm (Eastern Time) U.S. Calls: 866-606-8220 International Calls: 334-206-7828

DSN: 866-606-8220

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Effective June 29, 2018 vendors creating or updating their registration can have their registration activated prior to the approval of the required notarized letter. However, the signed copy of the notarized letter must be sent to the GSA Federal Service Desk (FSD) within 30 calendar days of activation, or the vendor risks no longer being active in SAM.

Vendors can check whether an account is active by performing a query by their CAGE or Unique Entity Identifier (transitioned from DUNS Number).

The registration process may now take several weeks, so vendors are highly encouraged to begin registering as soon as possible to avoid any possible delays in future contract awards. Remember, there is no cost to use SAM.

To find out additional information about the changes of the SAM registration process, contractors should visit the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) link located at the top of the SAM homepage (www.sam.gov).

4.0 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (SBPP)

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Participation Plan (SBPP) in accordance with DFARS 215.304. Reference section 00 21 00 of this Solicitation for additional submission requirements.

5.0 SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

The successful Offeror (if a large business) shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all of the elements required by FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003. The Subcontracting Plan is not a requirement for evaluation in source selection but shall be provided upon request before contract award (if the successful Offeror is a large business). The approved Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be incorporated into any resultant contract(s).

6.0 WHERE TO SUBMIT & SUBMITTAL DEADLINE

Offerors shall submit their proposals no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of SF 1442 of this solicitation as follows:

The Offeror’s proposal shall be submitted electronically, via Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE), as described below. The RFP will provide proposal submission instructions and receipt date for proposal submittal. The Offeror’s proposal shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

The Offeror’s proposal must be received by the Government by the date/time specified in the Solicitation.

6.1 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION: ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THIS RFP SHALL BE SUBMITTED

ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH PIEE. No paper copies, CD-ROMs or facsimile submissions will be accepted.

Electronic Proposal Submissions is required through the Army’s Electronic File Sharing Service in PIEE (https://piee.eb.mil/). The PIEE Application is used to send large files to individuals that would normally be too large to send via email. Information regarding how to set up a vendor registration is included in this link:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/portal/overview/vendorRegister.xhtml. On this page, click on the “Vendor User Registration” Doc and it will take you through the process of registering as a vendor.

If you plan on submitting a proposal, be sure to select “SOL-Solicitation” in the drop-down list and choose the “Proposal Manager” role to be given the proper permissions.

Further training is available at the following links:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml - This link shows information regarding the Solicitation application in PIEE and the different roles available.

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/solicitation/proposals.xhtml - This link is for Offerors regarding the Proposal Manager function and instruction on submitting a Proposal.

a. File Size Limitations: Offerors are advised to follow the PIEE instructions for uploading files. PIEE supports delivery of up to 1.9GB per file, with no limit on the number of files, as well as multiple file formats. If needed, Offerors are advised to break the files down into smaller sections in order to upload them into the system. In such cases, please divide the sections as logically as possible and be sure to clearly name the files as specified below.

b. File Naming Convention: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention:

- W912P521R0009 – (FIRM NAME) – VOLUME I

- W912P521R0009 – (FIRM NAME) – VOLUME II

Each file name shall begin with the Solicitation number followed by the firm’s name, and a brief file description.

Please see the examples above.

c. File Organization: Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be the size listed in the submission requirements for each factor. Pages shall be letter sized (larger page sizes (such as 11x17 fold- outs, etc.) will be counted as two pages. Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors.

Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented. Information pertaining to more than one evaluation factor should be repeated in each section for each factor.

d. Upload Completion & Deadline: Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on the Solicitation document. The time and date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion/delivery time and date recorded within the PIEE site. Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files (e.g. 10MB or more) will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208.

e. Electronic Files: Files shall be in their native format (i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text. Text and graphics portfolios of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by Microsoft Office or Adobe applications. Data submitted in a spreadsheet format shall be readable by MS Excel (all cells and formulas should be unlocked).

Any information, presented in a proposal that the Offeror wants safeguarded from disclosure to other parties must be identified and labeled in accordance with the requirements of FAR Provision 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (Alternate I), subparagraph (e), which is incorporated by reference in the RFP. The Government will endeavor to honor the restrictions against release requested by Offerors, to the extent permitted under United States law and regulations.

SECTION 00 21 00

PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL OF OFFERS

AND

PROPOSAL EVALUATION APPROACH

1.0 Submittal of Offers

1.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein.

However, in order to be effectively and equitably be evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the Offeror's past performance, scheduling approach, safety management, economy and efficiency, and small business participation plan necessary for successful completion of the project. The requirements stated in this RFP are minimums.

1.2 Offerors shall submit their proposals to the Government no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442 of this solicitation. Detailed submission instructions are listed above in section Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 6.0 Where to Submit and Submittal Deadline and subparagraph 6.1 Proposal Submission.

1.3 Offerors are required to submit a proposal made up of Past Performance, Scheduling Approach, Safety Management, Economy and Efficiency, Small Business Participation Plan, Price, and Pro Forma. All proposal materials shall be submitted via Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) with a bookmarked table of contents and/or a standard electronic Tab Index. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified below. Volume I shall be submitted in Portable Document Format (PDF) and shall be either tabbed or bookmarked to reflect the division of Factors in accordance with paragraph 3. Volume II shall be submitted as a separate PDF file and shall also be tabbed or bookmarked.

2.0 Proposal Evaluation Process

2.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of USACE will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Technical proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of Offerors are not revealed to anyone who is not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other Offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is the Best Value Tradeoff (BVTO) Process.

2.2 The evaluation process essentially consists of three (3) parts: (1) proposal compliance review; (2) past performance, technical, and price evaluations; and (3) best value decision.

2.2.1 Proposal Compliance Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications (if applicable) are complete and that a past performance, technical, and price proposal were received.

2.2.2 Past Performance and Technical Evaluations: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the proposals against the RFP requirements. Some factors will be rated using an adjectival-based system. Others will be rated on an “acceptable/unacceptable” basis. Past Performance will be rated based on recency/relevancy and confidence.

2.2.3 Price Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

2.2.4 Best Value Decision: After all of the above evaluations are complete the SSA performs this assessment by comparing the strengths, weaknesses, and the cost/price of the competing proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value to the Government.

3.0 Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors

3.1 Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors listed below in relative order of importance.

Note: To be eligible for award, Factor I – Past Performance, must be rated at least “Neutral Confidence,” and Factors II-VI, must be rated at least “Acceptable.”

All non-cost/price factors, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price. Offerors are reminded to include their best past performance, technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interest of the Government.

3.2 Volume I – Technical Proposal

3.2.1 Volume I – Factor I – Past Performance 1st

3.2.2 Volume I – Factor II – Scheduling Approach 2nd

3.2.3 Volume I – Factor III – Safety Management 3rd

3.2.4 Volume I – Factor IV – Economy and Efficiency 4th

3.2.5 Volume I – Factor V – Small Business Participation Plan 5th

3.3 Volume II – Price and Pro Forma Information

Tab A – Proposal Data Sheet Not Rated

Tab B – Standard Form (SF) 1442, and Acknowledged Amendments (if any) Not Rated

Tab C – Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable) Not Rated

Tab D – Section 00 10 00 Price Proposal Not Rated

Tab E – Section 00 45 00 – Representation and Certifications (unless available on www.SAM.gov) Not Rated

Tab F – Proof of Financial Capability Not Rated

Note: Offeror is responsible for ensuring the documents submitted are consistent throughout the proposal.

3.4 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Confidence Assessments

Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Scheduling Approach, Safety Management and Economy and Efficiency Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Adjectival Rating Description Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

The following Definition of Risk chart defines the level of risk listed in the above chart: Combined Technical/Risk Ratings:

Definition of Risk Applied to Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Risk Level Description Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance.

Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increase the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

Small Business Participation Plan Ratings

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

3.5 Definitions

a. Adverse Past Performance is past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation. Adverse past performance that must be addressed with Offerors includes unfavorable comments received from sources such as those received from respondents from past performance questionnaires or interviews that have not been finalized within a formal rating system. A best practice can be to discuss adverse past performance which caused a rating to be lowered to Satisfactory Confidence.

b. Best Value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement. See FAR 2.101.

c. Clarifications are limited exchanges between the Government and Offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

d. Communications are exchanges, between the Government and Offerors, after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(b).

e. Competitive Range – See FAR 15.306(c)

f. Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

g. Discussions are exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the Offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(d).

h. Evaluation Notice (EN) is the Procuring Contracting Officer’s (PCO) written notification to the Offeror for purposes of clarifications, communications, or discussions.

i. Performance Confidence Assessment is an evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the Offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

j. Recency, as it pertains to Past Performance information, is a measure of the time that has elapsed since the past performance reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant.

k. Relevancy, as it pertains to Past Performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

l. Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an Offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

n. Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

o. Source Selection Authority (SSA) is the official designated to make the source selection decision.

p. Source Selection Decision Document (SSDD) is the document that reflects the SSA’s independent, integrated, comparative assessment and decision.

q. Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) is a group of individuals representing the various functional disciplines relevant to the acquisition that is responsible for evaluating proposals against the solicitation criteria.

r. Strength is an aspect of an Offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

s. Uncertainty any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the Offeror is unclear (e.g.

more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).

t. Weakness means a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR

15.001.

4.0 Volume I - Factor I (Past Performance) - Performance Assessments

Due to the type of work associated with this project, the Government anticipates the use of key-subcontractors. As a result, if the Prime Contractor (Offeror identified in Block 14 of the SF1442) intends to subcontract Fabrication, Erection, or Installation of the projects listed below as similar in scope, the Offeror must submit evidence of a firm commitment (i.e., signed agreement or letter of commitment) from the subcontractor to perform if the Offeror is awarded the contract. The submission requirements and evaluation criteria utilized for the prime contractor will also be utilized by the SSEB for evaluation of these key-subcontractors.

Any key-subcontractors identified in the proposal must be used on the project. No substitutions will be accepted, unless otherwise agreed to by the Contracting Officer.

4.1 Submission Requirements:

In order to be considered recent, each Offeror shall provide descriptions of no more than three (3) past or current construction projects completed, or substantially complete (75% or more), within the last twenty (20) years (from the solicitation issuance date), that are similar to this project in scope and magnitude. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer.

Detailed project information shall be provided using the Project Detail Sheet format described at the end of this section. Ensure the proposal clearly describes which work the Offeror and the subcontractors performed.

In order to demonstrate relevant past performance, Offerors must submit detailed information for projects that are similar in scope and magnitude as further defined below.

NOTE: Do not submit more than three (3) projects. Any projects submitted that exceed the three (3) project limit will not be evaluated.

Similar in scope: The Offeror’s combined portfolio of projects submitted must demonstrate experience in all three

(3) of the scope features listed below. In order to be considered similar in scope, each project submitted must demonstrate experience of at least one (1) of the A, B, or C scope features below:

a. (1) Fabrication or (2) erection and installation of large Hydraulic Steel Structure (HSS) with a total weight in excess of 100,000 pounds; or

b. (1) Fabrication or (2) installation of lifting machinery systems with capacities to lift in excess of 100,000 pounds; or

c. Heavy lift/transportation of large/oversized items in a marine environment.

Similar in magnitude: Each project submitted shall be valued greater than $2 million to be considered similar in magnitude, yet at least one (1) project shall be valued greater than $10 million.

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor I, Past…