Chickamauga_Lock_401_Modification.pdf
PDF 11 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Chickamauga Lock Chamber Replacement
- Solicitation number
- W912P5-17-B-0001
About this file
TN Environmental Permit
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Table of Contents
PART I 3
AUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
PART II 5
DUTY TO REAPPLY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
OTHER PERMITS
OTHER INFORMATION
CHANGES AFFECTING THE PERMIT
Transfer/Change of Ownership
Change of Mailing Address
NONCOMPLIANCE
Effect of Noncompliance
Reporting of Noncompliance
Adverse Impact
LIABILITIES
Civil and Criminal Liability
Liability under State Law
REOPENER:
APPEAL:
PART III 8
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION:
APPENDIX I
Maps - Permit Sketches - Other Illustrations or Data
§ 401 Water Quality Certification NRS16.166 Modification
PART I
Authorized Alterations
The authorized work includes excavation of approximately 98,000 cubic yards of material from the bed of Nickajack Reservoir (Tennessee River Mile 471.0), directly below Chickamauga Dam in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The excavation shall take place within an existing cofferdam structure directly adjacent to Chickamauga Lock. Activities associated with the excavation work consist of the following activities:
Secant Pile Wall- construction of a secant pile wall approximately 51’ x 2’ in size on the interior of the existing cofferdam to stabilize the structure before excavation;
Inclined Rock Anchors- installation of 44 inclined rock anchors for stability purposes within the interior of the cofferdam (anchors are 60-68 strand, ranging in length from 66’ to 102’ and have bond lengths of 39’ to 43’);
Exploratory Drilling- drilling of 71 exploratory holes within the cofferdam, up to approximately 70 feet below the bottom of the reservoir;
Rock Excavation- excavation of approximately 98,000 cubic yards of predominately limestone rock within the boundaries of the existing cofferdam (approximately 6.48 acres). The area within the cofferdam has been previously dewatered and excavated during previous construction activities. Mussels from the cofferdam were relocated prior to excavation in earlier construction efforts. Excavation may vary from a minimum depth of 5 feet to a maximum depth 32 feet within the cofferdam area depending on the required founding elevations of the new concrete lock structure and the potential presence of bentonite clay formations. The excavation will be carried down utilizing support measures such as rock bolts and shotcrete;
Disposal of Excavated Materials- Materials excavated from the cofferdam would be disposed of at a site consisting of approximately 4.5 acres of uplands and 0.03 acre of emergent wetlands. The site has been used for disposal materials from previous excavations from Chickamauga Lock. As part of the disposal activities, an existing toe drain for Chickamauga Dam would be either removed and replaced at the current location with a stronger pipe capable of withstanding the weight of increased fill material, or a supplemental drain would be constructed around the disposal area to a new outfall location. The pipe for the toe drain currently runs underneath the disposal area and empties into North Chickamauga Creek. Total impacts to waters of the State would involve the excavation of 98,000 cy of rock from approximately 6.48 acres of Nickajack Reservoir located within an existing cofferdam and the permanent fill of 0.03 acre of emergent wetlands at the proposed disposal site.
Construction of a New Lock- The new lock would be 110 foot x 600 foot lock chamber and is to be constructed inside of the existing cofferdam structure.
Special Conditions:
1. The permittee shall submit as-built drawings of record that reflect the “as-constructed” condition of all authorized alterations to waters of the state.
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
a. The drawings shall include sufficient information, including photographic documentation, to demonstrate conformance with the approved plans, specifications, and special conditions of this permit.
b. The report shall be submitted within 90 days of completion of the project.
c. The report may be submitted via email to water.permits@tn.gov or to the following address:
Division of Water Resources Natural Resources Unit William R. Snodgrass - Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 11th Floor Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1102
General Conditions:
1. It is the responsibility of the permittee to convey all terms and conditions of this permit to all contractors. A copy of this permit, approved plans and any other documentation pertinent to the activities authorized by this permit shall be maintained on site at all times during periods of construction activity.
2. The work shall be accomplished in conformance with the accepted plans, specifications, data and other information submitted in support of the application and the limitations, requirements and conditions set forth herein.
3. Work shall not commence until the permittee has received the federal §404 permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, a §26a permit from the Tennessee Valley Authority or authorization under a Tennessee NPDES Storm Water Construction Permit where necessary.
The permittee is responsible for obtaining these permits.
4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be stringently implemented throughout the construction period to prevent sediments, oils, or other project-related pollutants from being discharged.
5. Appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure that petroleum products or other chemical pollutants are prevented from entering waters of the state. All spills must be reported to the appropriate emergency management agency, and measures shall be taken immediately to prevent the pollution of waters of the state, including groundwater, should a spill occur.
6. Temporary or permanent soil stabilization shall be accomplished within 15 days after final grading or other earth work. Permanent stabilization with perennial vegetation or other permanently stable, non-eroding surface shall replace any temporary measures as soon as practicable. Vegetative species must be on approved native species planting list, (Landscaping with Natives; http://www.tneppc.org/pages/landscaping#native_plants).
7. All work shall be carried out in such a manner as will prevent violations of water quality criteria as stated in Rule 0400-4-3-.03 of the Rules of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. This includes, but is not limited to, the prevention of any discharge that causes a condition in which visible solids, bottom deposits, or turbidity impairs the usefulness of waters of the state for any of the uses designated by Rule 0400-4-4.
These uses include fish and aquatic life (including trout streams and naturally reproducing
§ 401 Water Quality Certification trout streams), livestock watering and wildlife, recreation, irrigation, industrial water supply, domestic water supply, and navigation.
8. Adverse impact to formally listed state or federal threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat is prohibited.
9. This permit does not authorize adverse impacts to cultural, historical or archeological features or sites.
PART II
Duty to Reapply
Permittee is not authorized to discharge or conduct an activity that alters the properties of waters of the state after the expiration date of this permit. In order to receive authorization to discharge or to conduct an activity that alters the properties of waters of the state beyond the expiration date, the permittee shall submit such information and forms as are required to the director of the Division of Water Resources. Such applications must be properly signed and certified.
If any portion of the permitted activities, including the authorized impacts to water resources, compensatory mitigation requirements, or post-project monitoring is not completed before the expiration date of this permit the permittee must apply for permit extension or re-issuance. The permittee shall submit such information and forms as are required to the director of the Division of Water Resources at least ninety (90) days prior to its expiration date. Such applications must be properly signed and certified.
Property Rights
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations.
Other Permits
This permit does not preclude requirements of other federal, state or local laws. This permit also serves as a state of Tennessee aquatic resource alteration permit (ARAP) pursuant to the Tennessee Water Quality Control Act of 1977 (T.C.A. §69-3-101 et seq.).
Other Information
If the permittee becomes aware that he/she failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the director, then he/she shall promptly submit such facts or information.
Changes Affecting the Permit
Transfer/Change of Ownership
1. This permit may be transferred to another party, provided there are no activity or project modifications, no pending enforcement actions, or any other changes which might affect the permit conditions contained in the permit, by the permittee if:
a. The permittee notifies the Director of the proposed transfer at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date;
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
b. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specified date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and contractual liability between them; and
c. The Director does not notify the current permittee and the new permittee, within 30 days, of his or her intent to modify, revoke, reissue, or terminate the permit, or require that a new application be filed rather than agreeing to the transfer of the permit.
2. The permittee must provide the following information to the division in their formal notice of intent to transfer ownership:
a. the permit number of the subject permit;
b. the effective date of the proposed transfer;
c. the name and address of the transferor;
d. the name and address of the transferee;
e. the names of the responsible parties for both the transferor and transferee;
f. a statement that the transferee assumes responsibility for the subject permit;
g. a statement that the transferor relinquishes responsibility for the subject permit;
h. the signatures of the responsible parties for both the transferor and transferee, and;
i. a statement regarding any proposed modifications to the permitted activities or project, its operations, or any other changes which might affect the permit conditions contained in the permit.
Change of Mailing Address
The permittee shall promptly provide to the director written notice of any change of mailing address. In the absence of such notice the original address of the permittee will be assumed to be correct.
Noncompliance
Effect of Noncompliance
All discharges shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of applicable state and federal laws and is grounds for enforcement action, permit termination, permit modification, or denial of permit reissuance.
Reporting of Noncompliance
24-Hour Reporting
1. In the case of any noncompliance which could cause a threat to public drinking supplies, or any other discharge which could constitute a threat to human health or the environment, the required notice of non-compliance shall be provided to the Division of Water Resources in the appropriate
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
Environmental Field Office within 24-hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. (The Environmental Field Office should be contacted for names and phone numbers of environmental response personnel).
2. A written submission must be provided within five (5) days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances unless this requirement is waived by the director on a case-by-case basis. The permittee shall provide the director with the following information:
a. A description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance;
b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and
c. The steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the non-complying discharge.
Scheduled Reporting
For instances of noncompliance which are not reported under subparagraph a.
above, the permittee shall report the noncompliance by contacting the permit coordinator, and provide all information concerning the steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the violation and the anticipated time the violation is expected to continue.
Adverse Impact
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to the waters of Tennessee resulting from noncompliance with this permit, including but not limited to, accelerated or additional monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the noncompliance. It shall not be a defense for the permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.
Liabilities
Civil and Criminal Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. Notwithstanding this permit, the permittee shall remain liable for any damages sustained by the state of Tennessee, including but not limited to fish kills and losses of aquatic life and/or wildlife, as a result of the discharge of pollutants to any surface or subsurface waters. Additionally, notwithstanding this Permit, it shall be the responsibility of the permittee to conduct its discharge activities in a manner such that public or private nuisances or health hazards will not be created.
Liability under State Law
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended.
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
Reopener:
This permit may be modified, suspended, or revoked for cause, including:
1. Violation of any of the terms or conditions of this permit or of T.C.A § 69-3-101 et.
seq.;
2. Obtaining the permit by misrepresentation or failing to disclose fully all relevant facts;
3. A change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent change in the conditions of this permit.
Appeal:
An appeal of this action may be made as provided in T.C.A. §69-3-105(i) and Rule 0400-04-05- .12 by submitting a petition for appeal:
1. The petition must be filed within THIRTY (30) DAYS after public notice of the issuance of the permit.
2. The petition must specify the provisions subject to appeal and the basis for the appeal.
3. The petition should be addressed to the technical secretary of the Tennessee Board of Water Quality, Oil and Gas at the following address: Ms. Tisha Benton, Director, Division of Water Resources, William R. Snodgrass - Tennessee Tower, 312 Rosa L.
Parks Avenue, 11th Floor, Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1534. Any hearing would be in accordance with T.C.A. §§69-3-110 and 4-5-301 et seq.
PART III
Notice of Determination:
Concern The future connection of the North Chickamauga Park greenway to the Chattanooga River Walk, in addition to the natural resource values of the TVA's Big Ridge Small Wild Area, may potentially be compromised by the disposal of the excavated rock.
Determination Upland disposal of dredged material is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. However, the proposed disposal site was identified as a spoil area in both the 1996 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the project (TVA) and the 2002 Final Supplement Environmental Impact Statement (Corps). The site has already been disturbed by placement of excavated material from 2007 through 2010. The project would result in short-term aesthetic impacts to the immediate construction area but the placement area is proposed to be covered with topsoil and seeded with native vegetation in the final stages of lock construction to make the area more aesthetically pleasing.
Concern The placement of rubble fill may leave several acres of prime location dangerous and unsuited for any use.
Determination Upland disposal of dredged material is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. The Corps’ responds that the work would not result in placement
§ 401 Water Quality Certification of dredged materials into any undisturbed natural areas as the placement area has already been used for disposal of material during construction of the cofferdam. The areas surrounding the placement site are not suitable locations for building development as they are all owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for the purposes of operating Chickamauga Lock and Dam.
Concern The hydrology of the wetlands adjacent to the disposal area may be negatively affected by the project.
Determination The wetland’s hydrology, either inflow or outflow, should not be affected by the disposal of material. The source of water or hydrology for the wetland is from the side opposite the disposal area, therefore the fill should not affect the wetlands hydrologic source.
The outlet flow from the wetland is to be avoided as well, therefore not affecting the wetland’s outflow.
Concern The excavated rock material may have some commercial value, thereby avoiding the necessity of disposal at the planned disposal site.
Determination Upland disposal of dredged material is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. The Corps’ responds that the proposed excavation and disposal associated with this project would be performed by a contractor. Although the disposal site was identified as the preferred alternative to placed dredged material, the contractor, in consultation with the Corps, would have the option to explore off-site locations to place the dredged material (including commercial vendor sites). These options would be continually evaluated throughout the life of the contract.
Concern There is a history of use of part of the disposal site as a firing range. Lead bullet contaminants may become so trapped by stone as to be unrecoverable for any future required site mitigation.
Determination The future use of the upland disposal site is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. However, based on available information, it appears that an area near the disposal site was used for firearms training/practice although the area was never formally designated as such. However, the target areas were located outside of the disposal site to the east.
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
General topographic location map
The photographs below shows the proposed excavation area within an existing cofferdam and disposal area.
Proposed Stability Measures
Appendix I
Maps - Permit Sketches - Other Illustrations or Data
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
Excavation Site: The location of the cofferdam maintenance is Nickajack Reservoir, an open water impoundment of the Tennessee River (mile 471.0) directly downstream of Chickamauga Dam. The construction area is within an existing cofferdam that has previously been excavated. The substrate consists of limestone bedrock with sparse amounts of rock and gravel that has accumulated since initial construction. Pictures of the lock floor after a dewatering event in 2012 are shown below.
Overview of cofferdam (dewatered)
Substrate in cofferdam
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
Disposal Site: The disposal area is a site approximately 4.5 acres in size and approximately 1,800’ northeast of Chickamauga Lock, near the left descending bank of North Chickamauga Creek. The disposal area was used up to 2012 during a previous excavation used to create the existing cofferdam area.
Chickamauga Lock Disposal Area Location Map
The site consists almost entirely of uplands, however the disposal area is bordered to the northeast by a forested wetland (WET-002), which discharges to an intermittent stream (STR- 001). STR-001 runs through the northern portion of the proposed disposal area for approximately 340 linear feet from east to west as shown in figures below. Based on previous records, the stream was created by changes in the diversion of water on the site from previous disposal activities. STR-001 begins from the drainage of WET-002 and flows across the disposal site into a riprapped ditch (approximately 106’) and then into a culvert (approximately 33’) before flowing off the site. One alternative under consideration (Alternative 2 – See Section 10; Figure 14), would use the entire disposal area, with the exception of the southwest corner to store excavated materials. However, under Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative), impacts to WET-002 and STR-001 would be avoided by this project. In the photographs below, it is important to note that the blue line represents the contractor work area for disposal of excavated materials, not the fill area, which is further discussed in Section 10.
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
Entire Disposal Area
STR-001 Baseline Condition Drawing
WET-002
WET-001
STR-001
STR-001
WET-002
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
The disposal of excavated material from within the cofferdam would permanently fill WET-001 resulting in 0.03 acre permanent loss of emergent wetlands.
An existing toe drain for Chickamauga Dam currently runs underneath the disposal area and empties into North Chickamauga Creek. To avoid damages to the toe drain associated with the extra weight of additional fill material, two alternatives are being considered. Alternative 1 would excavate and replace the existing toe drain in place with a stronger pipe of the same diameter that will be able to support the additional overburden weight. Alt 1 would result in the excavation and fill of 0.03 acre of emergent wetlands (WET-001), the same wetlands proposed to be filled during disposal activities. Realignment of the toe drain is a second alternative being considered (Alt 2). The realignment would result in the addition of a pipe from an existing manhole south of the disposal area and would convey water into North Chickamauga Creek, approximately 450’ linear feet downstream of the current outfall. Under Alt 2, the current toe drain and outfall would be left in place to collect any seepage from the northwest portion of the property. Although a new outfall would be constructed, the route of the new toe drain pipe is proposed totally in uplands and no waters of the State would be altered, other than a new outfall, which would empty into North Chickamauga Creek.
Plan for new toe drain pipe and outfall (Alt 2 below)
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
Photograph of WET-001
The proposed excavation would take place within an existing cofferdam structure and would change the bottom elevation within the cofferdam to varying degrees depending on the required founding elevations of the new concrete lock structure and the potential presence of bentonite clay formations. The resulting condition of the river bed within the cofferdam would be a solid bedrock bottom, much like the existing substrate, with varying depths. There would be no functional loss from the baseline conditions in the excavation area.
In the disposal area, impacts to WET-002 and STR-001 would be avoided. A 15-foot buffer would be left around WET-002 to minimize any potential indirect effects from the surrounding disposal activities. Either a realignment or replacement of an existing toe drain would occur.
Approximately 0.03 acre of emergent wetland (WET-001) would be permanently filled beneath the excavated material. Although a minor loss of function associated with WET-001 would occur, the functional capacity of the wetland is poor given its position on the landscape, disturbed soils and lack of habitat for wildlife. Due to the small size of proposed wetland impacts and the limited functions provided by WET-001, no compensatory mitigation is proposed for the 0.03 acre impact.
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
N
060 30 60 120FT
SCALE: 1’’= 60’
TRANSMISSION
LINES
ACCESS ROAD
RIGHT NAVIGATION
CHANNEL LINE
NICKAJACK LAKE
SCALE: 1" = 60’-0"
SITE PLAN
FLOW
F L
O W
R8 R6
R5 R4R9R10
R13 R12 R11
R14 R15
R18A R17A
R17R18
R16
R7
L12
L16 L15
L13
L14
L11 L10 L9 L8 L7 L6
L5 L4
U3
U2
M1
U3
U2 M1L17
Z 662.170
R O
C K
G R
A V
E L
AREA U/C
670.2
669.5
669.7
670.3671.9
674.5
673.8
673.8
673.7
673.4 672.4
672.2
671.9
671.5 671.7
671.3
663.1
FENCE U/C
ROCK/GRAVEL
ROCK/GRAVEL
ROCK/GRAVEL
679.1
697.8
697.8
684.4
684.9
696.8
695.5
661.2
668.1
669.1
640.5
639.5
640.1
640.1
640.4
640.9
639.5
639.3
655.1
657.5
672.4
671.9 677.7
673.9
669.8
670.2
678.7 679.8
671.4
665.3
666.9
666.2
664.3
680.9
682.8
682.5 683.3
681.5
680.4
697.7
697.3
680.3
679.8679.1
697.9
697.7
697.7
670.1
670.8
671.2
671.4
ROCK/GRAVEL
635.8
ROCKS
697.7
697.7
697.7
697.7
697.7
PROTECTION
CELL
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RR BRIDGE
(VERTICAL LIFT SPAN)
LEFT NAVIGATION
CHANNEL LINE
FLOW DEFLECTION DIKE
STA 15+00 D
STA 13+00
STA 11+00 D STA 9+00 D
STA 7+00 D
STA 5+00 D
STA 3+00 D
STA 1+00 D STA 0+00 STA 1+00 U
STA 3+00 U
STA 5+00 U
STA 8+00 U
{ 110’ x 600’ NEW LOCK
{ 60’ x 360’ EXISTING LOCK
DOWNSTREAM RIVER WALL
DOWNSTREAM LAND WALL
UPSTREAM RIVER WALL
UPSTREAM LAND WALL
SPILLWAY
{ EXISTING DAM AXIS
SPILLWAY APRON
BAFFLE WEIR
TN SR 153
BRIDGE
NEW LOCK
COFFERDAM
LOCK
N O R T
H
C
H I C
K A
M A
U G
A
C R E E
K
FLOW
T
S R
B
I
D G
E
TRANSMISSION
LINES
O
L
C K
S
N 282,036.8
E 2,198,923.4
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i l e a m e
P l o t
D t e
P l i m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W .d g n
:0
:3
P M
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C
W_TVA
---JDD--0
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
APR/10
JLD
O.V.
A.P.
B.T.
1" = 60’
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-01
61W520-01
O.V. A.P. B.T.
LOCK REPLACEMENT
SITE PLAN
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
645’-6"
SPAN UR-1
114’-6"
SPAN UR-2
124’-0"
SPAN UR-3
124’-0"
SPAN UR-4
124’-0"
SPAN UR-5
114’-6"
NOSE PIER
44’-6"
LUMINAIRE
HAND RAIL
(TYP)
LADDER
(TYP)
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
ACCESS HATCH
(TYP)
TOW HAULAGE
EQUIPMENT PAD
RETURN SHEAVE
S T
A
U
E
I
E R
S T
A
F A
C
E
E
A
E
A
E
A
E
A
T
A
N O
L I
H
CHECK POST
(TYP)
NOSE PIER
EL 682.5
NORMAL HIGH WATER
EL 675.0
NORMAL LOW WATER
UR-5T
UR-5B
EL 607.0
EL 591.0
EL 584.0
EL 585.0
DRILLED SHAFT
TIP ELEVATION (TYP)
EL 619.0
EL 605.0
RIVER BED
TOP OF ROCK
(CANNON)
TOP OF ROCK
(HERMITAGE)
EL 662.5
UR-4T
UR-4B
LADDER
(TYP)
HAND RAIL
(TYP)
LUMINAIRE
(TYP)
LADDER
(TYP)
UR-3T
UR-3B
UR-2T
UR-2B
LINE HOOK
(TYP)
UR-1T
UR-1B
EL 692.0
TOP OF FIXED WALL
EL 673.0
BOTTOM OF FIXED WALL
PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"
ELEVATION
61W520-40
61W520-39
61W520-40
61W520-41
61W520-40
61W520-39
61W520-40
61W520-39 SIM
EL 540.0
N O
T E
NOTE 6
4’-6"
EXISTING
DAM MONOLITH
(R1) NOTE 5
61W520-47
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
020 10 20 40FT
SCALE: 1’’= 20’
N
FLOW
LUMINAIRE
(TYP) NOTE 8
{ LOCK
Y
P
FACE OF
CONCRETE
{ JOINT
FACE OF
MONOLITH
FACE OF
BEAM
HOSE
CABINET
(TYP)
NOTE 9
CHECK POST
TYPE 1
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
TOW
HAULAGE
RAIL
NOTE 4
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
EXISTING
DAM MONOLITH
(M1) NOTE 5A
61W520-93
17’-2�"
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i m e
P l t e
P l m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W .d g n
:0
:0
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C06
W_TVA
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
FEB/10
JLD
I.L.
A.P.
B.T.
1" = 20’
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-10
61W520-10
UPSTREAM RIVER WALL
PLAN & ELEVATION
FUTURE SKIRTS (TYP
EXCEPT NOTED)
THREE-WAY
SKIRT BRACKET
FUTURE SKIRTS
NOTES:
1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE SHAFT LOCATION
SHOWN FOR COST ESTIMATION ONLY. ACTUAL ROCK
ELEVATION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE
GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE.
2. TEMPORARY CASING SHALL BE FOUNDED 1 FOOT INTO THE
ROCK.
3. EACH EMBEDDED LENGTH OF SHAFT IN THE ROCK SHALL
NOT BE LESS THAN SHOWN.
4. SEE TOW HAULAGE SHEETS 64W514, 64W515, 64W521 TO
64W523 AND 64W531 FOR TOW HAULAGE DETAILS.
5. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 672.5.
6. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.
7. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,
SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.
8. FOR LIGHTING POSTS, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.
9. FOR HOSE CABINETS, SEE SHEET 67W443.
10. SKIRT INSERTS ARE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE SKIRTING OF
ALL SPANS. SEE SHEETS 61W520-80 AND 61W520-81 FOR
SKIRT BRACKET AND INSERT DETAILS. FOR UR-1T AND
UR-1B BEAMS, SEE SHEET 61W520-93 FOR THREE-WAY
SKIRT BRACKET.
2’-0"
2’-0"
{ THREE-WAY
SKIRT BRACKET
EL 662.5
2’-0" 2’-0"
2’-0" 2’-0"
2’-0" 2’-0"
2’-0" 2’-0"
{ BRACKET (TYP) { BRACKET (TYP)
SKIRTS
TYPE "A" FUTURE
SKIRTS
TYPE "A" FUTURE
TYPE "B" FUTURE SKIRTS
TYPE "A" FUTURE
TYPE "A" FUTURE
TYPE "A" FUTURE
TYPE "A" FUTURE SKIRTS
{ SKIRT BRACKET
TYPE "B" SKIRT
TYPE "B" FUTURE SKIRTS TYPE "B" SKIRT
I.L. A.P. B.T.
LOCK REPLACEMENT
GOVERNMENT
FURNISHED
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
HAND RAIL
ACCESS HATCH
(TYP)
149’-6"
SPAN UL-1
105’-0"
S T
A
N O
L I
T H
S T
A
E R
HAND RAIL
(TYP)
EL 692.0
TOP OF FIXED WALL
EL 673.0
BOTTOM OF FIXED WALL
UL-1T
UL-1B
LUMINAIRE
EL 682.5
NORMAL HIGH WATER
EL 675.0
NORMAL LOW WATER
EL 662.5
EL 565.0
EL 609.0
EL 611.0
DRILLED SHAFT TIP ELEVATION
(SEE NOTES)
RIVER BED
TOP OF ROCK
(CANNON)
TOP OF ROCK
(HERMITAGE)
PLAN
ELEVATION
CHECK POST
TYPE 1 (TYP)
CHECK POST
TYPE 1 (TYP)
N O
T E
NOTE 6
4’-6"
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
020 10 20 40FT
SCALE: 1’’= 20’
FLOW
N
44’-6"
S T
A
N O
L I
T H
LUMINAIRE
NOTE 4
FACE OF
MONOLITH
FACE OF
BEAM
Y
P
FACE OF
CONCRETE
EXISTING
DAM MONOLITH
(M1) NOTE 5
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i m e
P l t e
P l m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W .d g n
:0
:0
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C06
W_TVA
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
FEB/10
JLD
I.L.
A.P.
B.T.
1" = 20’
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-11
61W520-11
UPSTREAM LAND WALL
PLAN & ELEVATION
NOTES:
1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE SHAFT LOCATION
SHOWN FOR COST ESTIMATION ONLY. ACTUAL ROCK
ELEVATION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE
GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE.
2. TEMPORARY CASING SHALL BE FOUND 1 FOOT INTO THE
ROCK.
3. EACH EMBEDDED LENGTH OF SHAFT IN THE ROCK SHALL
NOT BE LESS THAN SHOWN.
4. FOR LIGHTING POST, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.
5. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 672.5.
6. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.
7. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,
SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.
8. SKIRT INSERTS ARE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE SKIRTS.
SEE SHEETS 61W520-80 AND 61W521-81 FOR SKIRT
BRACKET AND INSERT DETAILS.
FUTURE SKIRTS
(TYP)
SKIRT
TYPE "A"
2’-0"
2’-0"
SKIRTS SEE NOTE 8
TYPE "A" FUTURE
{ SKIRT BRACKET { SKIRT BRACKET
TYPE "B" FUTURE
SKIRTS SEE NOTE 8
TYPE "A" FUTURE
SKIRTS SEE NOTE 8
SKIRT
EXISTING
DAM MONOLITH
(M1) NOTE 5
LOCK REPLACEMENT
I.L. A.P. B.T.
GOVERNMENT
FURNISHED
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
RESTRAINER
RR BRIDGE
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
LADDER
43’-6"
SPAN DR-3
110’-6"
SPAN DR-2
120’-0"
SPAN DR-1
110’-6"
S T
A
A
N O
L I
T
E
A
T
A
A
E R
S T
A
E R
GUARD RAIL
(TYP)
DR-1M
DR-1T
DR-1B
EL 630.0
BOTTOM OF BEAM
TOP OF ROCK
(HERMITAGE)
DR-2M
DR-2T
DR-2B
LUMINAIRE
(TYP)
LINE HOOK
(TYP)
EL 616.0
EL 691.0
RR BRIDGE
LADDER
DR-3M
DR-3T
RIVERBED AND
TOP OF ROCK
(CANNON)
DR-3B
LUMINAIRE
(TYP)
NOSE PIER
EL 616.0
EL 600.0
EL 658.0
TOP OF FIXED WALL
EL 644.0
NORMAL HIGH WATER
EL 632.0
NORMAL LOW WATER
PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"
SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"
ELEVATION
LOCK MONOLITH
(R18) NOTE 2
LOCK MONOLITH
(R18) NOTE 2
N O
T E
NOTE 3
4’-6"
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
CHECK POST
TYPE 1
CHECK POST
TYPE 1
CHECK POST
TYPE 1
EL 616.0
(NOTE 1, TYP)
020 10 20 40FT
SCALE: 1’’= 20’
FLOW
E
A
LUMINAIRE
(TYP) NOTE 4
Y
P
FACE OF
CONCRETE
FACE OF
MONOLITH
FACE OF
BEAM
HOSE CABINET
NOTE 6
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i m e
P l t e
P l m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W .d g n
:0
:1
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C06
W_TVA
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
FEB/10
JLD
I.L.
A.P.
B.T.
1" = 20’
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-12
61W520-12
DOWNSTREAM RIVER WALL
PLAN & ELEVATION
NOTES:
1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE PIER LOCATIONS
IS EL 618.0. STEEL SHELL SHALL BE FOUNDED AT
ELEVATION SHOWN. SETTING PIPE PILES NOT SHOWN,
SEE SHEET 61W520-15 FOR LOCATION OF SETTING PIPE PILES
AND SHEETS 61W520-36 AND 61W520-52 FOR SETTING PIPE
PILE DETAILS.
2. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 629.5.
3. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.
4. FOR LIGHTING POSTS, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.
5. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,
SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.
6. FOR HOSE CABINET, SEE SHEET 67W443.
7. SKIRT INSERTS ARE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE SKIRTING OF ALL
SPANS. SEE SHEETS 61W520-80 AND 61W520-81 FOR SKIRT
BRACKET AND INSERT DETAILS.
8. ADJUST FUTURE SKIRT HEIGHT TO ACCOMMODATE SITE CONDITIONS
AS REQUIRED.
FUTURE SKIRTS
(TYP)
2’-9"TYPE "A" SKIRTS17’-9"17’-0"
SKIRTS
TYPE "B"
SKIRTS
TYPE "A"17’-9" 17’-0"2’-9" TYPE "A" SKIRTS
SKIRTS
TYPE "A"
{ SKIRT BRACKET (TYP.)
{ SKIRT
BRACKET
(TYP.)
LOCK REPLACEMENT
I.L. A.P. B.T.
GOVERNMENT
FURNISHED
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
43’-6"
SPAN DL-1
95’-6"
SPAN DL-2
105’-0"
SPAN DL-3
105’-0"
SPAN DL-4
120’-0"
SPAN DL-5
120’-0"
SPAN DL-6
120’-0"
SPAN DL-7
110’-6"
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
LADDER
(TYP)
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
RR BRIDGE
LADDER
(TYP)
S T
A
E R
S T
A
A
E
E
A
E
A
E
A
E
A
E
A
E
A
T
A
A
N O
L I
T H
CHECK POST
(TYP)
EL 658.0
TOP OF NOSE PIER AND
TOP OF FIXED WALL
DL-7T
DL-7M
DL-7B
EL 616.0
EL 644.0
NORMAL HIGH WATER
EL 632.0
NORMAL LOW WATER
EL 600.0
EL 616.0
LADDER
(TYP)
HAND RAIL
(TYP)
DL-6T
DL-6M
LUMINAIRE
(TYP)
DL-6B
DL-5B
DL-5M
DL-5T
DL-4T
DL-4M
DL-4B
RR BRIDGE
EL 691.0
EL 630.0
BOTTOM OF BEAM
EL 616.0
LADDER
(TYP)
DL-3T
DL-3M
DL-3B
EL 616.0
DL-2B
DL-2T
DL-2M
LINE HOOK
(TYP)
EL 616.0
DL-1T
DL-1M
DL-1B
LADDER
(TYP)
EL 616.0
TOP OF ROCK
(HERMITAGE)
PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"
LOCK MONOLITH
(L17) NOTE 2
LOCK MONOLITH
(L17) NOTE 2
N O
T E
NOTE 3
4’-6"
RESTRAINER
(TYP)
CHECK POST
(TYPE 1)
EL 616.0
(NOTE 1, TYP)
020 10 20 40FT
SCALE: 1’’= 20’
N
FLOW
LUMINAIRE
(TYP) NOTE 6
FACE OF
MONOLITH
FACE OF
BEAM
Y
P
FACE OF
CONCRETE
HOSE CABINET
(TYP)
NOTE 7
CHECK POST
TYPE 2 CHECK POST
TYPE 2
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
CHECK POST
TYPE 2
TOW HAULAGE RAIL
NOTE 5
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
NOTES:
1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE PIER LOCATIONS
IS EL 618.0. STEEL SHELL SHALL BE FOUNDED AT
ELEVATION SHOWN. SETTING PIPE PILES NOT SHOWN,
SEE SHEET 61W520-15 FOR LOCATION OF SETTING PIPE PILES
AND SHEETS 61W520-36 AND 61W520-52 FOR SETTING PIPE
PILE DETAILS.
2. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 629.5.
3. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.
4. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,
SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.
5. SEE TOW HAULAGE SHEETS 64W510, 64W511, 64W516, 64W517,
64W523 AND 64W531 FOR TOW HAULAGE DETAILS.
6. FOR LIGHTING POSTS, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.
7. FOR HOSE CABINETS, SEE SHEET 67W443.
APPROXIMATE
TOP OF ROCK
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i m e
P l t e
P l m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W
.d g n
:0
:1
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C06
W_TVA
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
APR/10
JLD
I.L.
A.P.
B.T.
1" = 20’
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-13
61W520-13
I.L. A.P. B.T.
LOCK REPLACEMENT
DOWNSTREAM LAND WALL
PLAN & ELEVATION
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
X
M
S T
A
SHAFT
SHAFT
FACE OF LOCK
SHAFT
FACE OF LOCK
STA 0+00 STA 1+00 U STA 2+00 U STA 3+00 U STA 4+00 U STA 5+00 U STA 6+00 U STA 7+00 U STA 8+00 U
{ LOCK
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
SHAFT
SCALE: 1" = 30’-0"
FOUNDATION PLAN
A F
T
S T
A
A F
T
S T
A
A F
T
S T
A
A F
T
S T
A
030 15 30 60FT
SCALE: 1’’= 30’
N
FLOW
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i m e
P l t e
P l m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W
.d g n
:0
:2
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C06
W_TVA
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
APR/10
JLD
I.L.
A.P.
B.T.
1" = 30’
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-14
61W520-14
SHAFT SCHEDULE
SHAFT
NO. TYPE
OFFSET
{ LOCK
STATION NORTHING EASTING
STA 2+67.36 U
STA 3+91.36 U
STA 5+15.36 U
STA 6+39.36 U
STA 7+63.86 U
STA 7+89.36 U
STA 2+67.86 U
STA 2+93.36 U
62.0’ R
85.0’ R
62.0’ R
85.0’ R
62.0’ R
85.0’ R
62.0’ R
85.0’ R
64.04’ R
88.04’ R
73.32’ R
64.04’ L
88.04’ L
73.32’ L
SHAFT
281985.1 2199192.9
281962.1 2199193.8
281989.9 2199316.8
281966.9 2199317.7
281994.7 2199440.7
281971.7 2199441.6
281999.5 2199564.6
281976.5 2199565.5
282002.3 2199689.1
281978.3 2199690.0
281993.9 2199714.9
282111.1 2199188.5
282135.1 2199187.6
282121.4 2199213.7
NOTE:
1. FOR SHAFT REINFORCEMENT SEE SHEETS 61W520-18,
61W520-19 AND 61W520-20.
2. STA 0+00
NORTHING 282036.77
EASTING 2198923.34
NOTE: "R" INDICATES RIVERWARD DIRECTION
"L" INDICATES LANDWARD DIRECTION
I.L. A.P. B.T.
LOCK REPLACEMENT
UPSTREAM WALLS
FOUNDATION PLAN
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
25’-6"
E
E R
S T
A
T
A
NOSE PIER
SHELL STRUCTURE
FACE OF LOCK
STA 16+00 D STA 15+00 D STA 14+00 D STA 13+00 D STA 12+00 D STA 11+00 D
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
T
A
A
N O
L I
T H
S T
A
LOWER GATE
PINTLES
EXISTING RAIL ROAD
BRIDGE PIER
INTERMEDIATE PIER
SHELL STRUCTURE
(TYP)
(TYP)
10’-3"
(TYP)
10’-3"
FACE OF LOCK
{ PIER
STA 10+00 D STA 9+00 D STA 8+00 D STA 7+00 D
FACE OF LOCKFACE OF LOCK
{ PIER
25’-6"
E
E R
S T
A
T
A
NOSE PIER
SHELL STRUCTURE
EXISTING RAIL ROAD
BRIDGE PIER
E R
S T
A
E R
S T
A
SCALE: 1" = 30’-0"
FOUNDATION PLAN
3’} STEEL
PIPE PILE
(TYP, NOTE 1)
030 15 30 60FT
SCALE: 1’’= 30’
N
FLOW
NOTE:
1. FOR PIPE PILE DETAILS SEE SHEET 61W520-52.
2. FOR PIPE PILE DETAILS SEE SHEET 61W520-36.
S T
A
3’} I.D. STEEL
PIPE PILE
(TYP, NOTE 2)
S T
A
A
N O
L I
T H
SCALE:
DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY
C.A.D. DRAWING
ISSUED BY:
R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD R
DATE
PLOT FACTOR:
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:
AS CONST
EXCEPT AS NOTED
NO.
REV.
DATE
R
R
DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD
PROJECT
ISSD
ID
CD
REV
DISCIPLINE
INTERFACE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F i m e
P l t e
P l m e
L
H c a d d s t r u c t
S h e e t s
W
.d g n
:0
:2
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
H
F
G
E
3 4 5 6
D
C
B
A
2 3 4 5 6
7 8
REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:
F
E
7 8 9 10
D
C
B
11 12
A
C
C06
W_TVA
JAN
INITIAL ISSUE
CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT
CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH
APR/10
JLD
I.L.
A.P.
B.T.
APPROACH WALLS
MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.
BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.
JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON
INCA ENGINEERS
61W520-15
61W520-15
1"= 30’
PILE SCHEDULE
NO.
OFFSET
{ LOCK
STATION NORTHING EASTING
STA 9+46.50 D 59.32’ R
73.23’ R
2197979.8
2197990.6
2197970.1
2197859.9
2197870.7
2197850.2
2197740.7
2197741.6
2197715.6
2198035.2
2198024.4
2198044.9
2197930.3
2197919.5
15 2197940.0
16 2197825.4
17 2197814.6
18 2197835.1
19 2197705.5
20 2197694.7
21 2197715.2
22 2197585.5
23 2197574.8
24 2197595.3
25 2197465.6
26 2197454.9
27 2197475.3
29 2197346.0
30 2197320.2
28 2197345.1
PILE
STA 9+36.25 D
73.23’ R
59.32’ R
STA 9+56.75 D
STA 10+66.50 D
73.23’ RSTA 10+56.25 D
STA 10+76.75 D 73.23’ R
STA 11+86.00 D 64.00’ R
STA 11+86.00 D 88.00’ R
STA 12+11.50 D 73.28’ R
STA 8+86.50 D 59.32’ L
STA 8+96.75 D 73.23’ L
STA 8+76.25 D 73.23’ L
STA 9+91.50 D 59.32’ L
73.23’ LSTA 10+1.75 D
STA 9+81.25 D 73.23’ L
STA 10+96.50 D 59.32’ L
STA 11+6.75 D 73.23’ L
73.23’ LSTA 10+86.25 D
STA 12+16.50 D 59.32’ L
73.23’ LSTA 12+26.75 D
73.23’ LSTA 12+6.25 D
59.32’ LSTA 13+36.50 D
73.23’ LSTA 13+46.75 D
STA 13+26.25 D 73.23’ L
59.32’ LSTA 14+56.50 D
73.23’ LSTA 14+66.75 D
73.23’ LSTA 14+46.25 D
64.00’ LSTA 15+76.00 D
STA 16+1.50 D 73.28’ L
STA 15+76.00 D 88.00’ L
PILE
PILEPILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
PILE
NOTE: "R" INDICATES RIVERWARD DIRECTION
"L" INDICATES LANDWARD DIRECTION
281941.0
281927.5
281926.7
281936.3
281922.8
281922.0
281927.1
281903.1
281916.8
282061.8
282075.3
282076.1
282057.8
282071.3
282072.1
282053.7
282067.2
282068.0
282049.1
282062.6
282063.4
282044.5
282058.0
282058.8
282039.8
282053.3
282054.1
282064.0
282040.0
282048.3
I.L. A.P. B.T.
LOCK REPLACEMENT
DOWNSTREAM WALLS
FOUNDATION PLAN
§ 401 Water Quality Certification
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .