Chickamauga_Lock_401_Modification.pdf

PDF 11 MB Posted

Attached to
Chickamauga Lock Chamber Replacement
Solicitation number
W912P5-17-B-0001
Issued by

About this file

TN Environmental Permit

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Abstract_of_Offers.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001-0005.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am5_TSpecs-pages.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am4_Plans-sheets.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am4_TSpecs-pages.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001-0003.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am3_Plans-sheets.pdf PDF
CHL_Enterprise_Database_Schema.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am3_Bid_Schedule_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TVA_RSOE_LICENSE_AGREEMENT_DRAFT_7-27-17.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001-0002.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am2_Bid_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_TSpecs-pages.pdf PDF
CKLK_LC_Revit_Operations_Building.zip ZIP file
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv2(05of15).pdf PDF
118339_v2015_S_OPS.rvt —
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(08of16).pdf PDF
118339_v2015_SITE.rvt —
SiteVisitRoster-Muscle_Shoals.pdf PDF
118339_v2015_M_CS.rvt —
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv2(06of15).pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv2(08of15).pdf PDF
118339_v2015_E_OPS.rvt —
Arch_Keynotes_UFGS_118339.txt TXT text file
FIO_Miter_Gates,_Culvert_Valves,_Culvert_Bulkheads_and_Air_Seals_-_Shop_Drawings.pdf PDF
FIO_Plans_For_DS_Cross-Over_Bridge_and_US_Lock_Wall_Bridge_Access.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv2(09of15).pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(11of16).pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_Bid_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(14of16).pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001-0001.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(07of16).pdf PDF
FIO_Plans_For_Miter_Gates,_Culvert_Valves,_Culvert_Bulkheads_and_Air_Seals.pdf PDF
118339_v2015_S_CS.rvt —
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv2(12of15).pdf PDF
118339_v2015_A_CS.rvt —
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(09of16).pdf PDF
FIO_Combined_Cofferdam.pdf PDF
118339_v2015_A_OPS.rvt —
Arch_Keynotes_UFGS_118339.txt TXT text file
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(03of16).pdf PDF
FIO_DS_Cross-Over_Bridge_and_US_Lock_Wall_Bridge_Access_-_Shop_Drawings.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv1(02of16).pdf PDF
SiteVisitRoster-CHI.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001Am1_AppBv2(13of15).pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001_RTA_TSpecs.pdf PDF
W912P5-17-B-0001_TSpecs_AppA.pdf PDF
CKLK_Lock_Chamber_Drawings_-_Folio_3.pdf PDF
CKLK_Lock_Chamber_Drawings_-_Folio_1.pdf PDF
US_Citizen_Site_Visit_Form_AUG_2016.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Table of Contents

PART I 3

AUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

GENERAL CONDITIONS:

PART II 5

DUTY TO REAPPLY

PROPERTY RIGHTS

OTHER PERMITS

OTHER INFORMATION

CHANGES AFFECTING THE PERMIT

Transfer/Change of Ownership

Change of Mailing Address

NONCOMPLIANCE

Effect of Noncompliance

Reporting of Noncompliance

Adverse Impact

LIABILITIES

Civil and Criminal Liability

Liability under State Law

REOPENER:

APPEAL:

PART III 8

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION:

APPENDIX I

Maps - Permit Sketches - Other Illustrations or Data

§ 401 Water Quality Certification NRS16.166 Modification

PART I

Authorized Alterations

The authorized work includes excavation of approximately 98,000 cubic yards of material from the bed of Nickajack Reservoir (Tennessee River Mile 471.0), directly below Chickamauga Dam in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The excavation shall take place within an existing cofferdam structure directly adjacent to Chickamauga Lock. Activities associated with the excavation work consist of the following activities:

Secant Pile Wall- construction of a secant pile wall approximately 51’ x 2’ in size on the interior of the existing cofferdam to stabilize the structure before excavation;

Inclined Rock Anchors- installation of 44 inclined rock anchors for stability purposes within the interior of the cofferdam (anchors are 60-68 strand, ranging in length from 66’ to 102’ and have bond lengths of 39’ to 43’);

Exploratory Drilling- drilling of 71 exploratory holes within the cofferdam, up to approximately 70 feet below the bottom of the reservoir;

Rock Excavation- excavation of approximately 98,000 cubic yards of predominately limestone rock within the boundaries of the existing cofferdam (approximately 6.48 acres). The area within the cofferdam has been previously dewatered and excavated during previous construction activities. Mussels from the cofferdam were relocated prior to excavation in earlier construction efforts. Excavation may vary from a minimum depth of 5 feet to a maximum depth 32 feet within the cofferdam area depending on the required founding elevations of the new concrete lock structure and the potential presence of bentonite clay formations. The excavation will be carried down utilizing support measures such as rock bolts and shotcrete;

Disposal of Excavated Materials- Materials excavated from the cofferdam would be disposed of at a site consisting of approximately 4.5 acres of uplands and 0.03 acre of emergent wetlands. The site has been used for disposal materials from previous excavations from Chickamauga Lock. As part of the disposal activities, an existing toe drain for Chickamauga Dam would be either removed and replaced at the current location with a stronger pipe capable of withstanding the weight of increased fill material, or a supplemental drain would be constructed around the disposal area to a new outfall location. The pipe for the toe drain currently runs underneath the disposal area and empties into North Chickamauga Creek. Total impacts to waters of the State would involve the excavation of 98,000 cy of rock from approximately 6.48 acres of Nickajack Reservoir located within an existing cofferdam and the permanent fill of 0.03 acre of emergent wetlands at the proposed disposal site.

Construction of a New Lock- The new lock would be 110 foot x 600 foot lock chamber and is to be constructed inside of the existing cofferdam structure.

Special Conditions:

1. The permittee shall submit as-built drawings of record that reflect the “as-constructed” condition of all authorized alterations to waters of the state.

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

a. The drawings shall include sufficient information, including photographic documentation, to demonstrate conformance with the approved plans, specifications, and special conditions of this permit.

b. The report shall be submitted within 90 days of completion of the project.

c. The report may be submitted via email to water.permits@tn.gov or to the following address:

Division of Water Resources Natural Resources Unit William R. Snodgrass - Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 11th Floor Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1102

General Conditions:

1. It is the responsibility of the permittee to convey all terms and conditions of this permit to all contractors. A copy of this permit, approved plans and any other documentation pertinent to the activities authorized by this permit shall be maintained on site at all times during periods of construction activity.

2. The work shall be accomplished in conformance with the accepted plans, specifications, data and other information submitted in support of the application and the limitations, requirements and conditions set forth herein.

3. Work shall not commence until the permittee has received the federal §404 permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, a §26a permit from the Tennessee Valley Authority or authorization under a Tennessee NPDES Storm Water Construction Permit where necessary.

The permittee is responsible for obtaining these permits.

4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be stringently implemented throughout the construction period to prevent sediments, oils, or other project-related pollutants from being discharged.

5. Appropriate steps shall be taken to ensure that petroleum products or other chemical pollutants are prevented from entering waters of the state. All spills must be reported to the appropriate emergency management agency, and measures shall be taken immediately to prevent the pollution of waters of the state, including groundwater, should a spill occur.

6. Temporary or permanent soil stabilization shall be accomplished within 15 days after final grading or other earth work. Permanent stabilization with perennial vegetation or other permanently stable, non-eroding surface shall replace any temporary measures as soon as practicable. Vegetative species must be on approved native species planting list, (Landscaping with Natives; http://www.tneppc.org/pages/landscaping#native_plants).

7. All work shall be carried out in such a manner as will prevent violations of water quality criteria as stated in Rule 0400-4-3-.03 of the Rules of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. This includes, but is not limited to, the prevention of any discharge that causes a condition in which visible solids, bottom deposits, or turbidity impairs the usefulness of waters of the state for any of the uses designated by Rule 0400-4-4.

These uses include fish and aquatic life (including trout streams and naturally reproducing

§ 401 Water Quality Certification trout streams), livestock watering and wildlife, recreation, irrigation, industrial water supply, domestic water supply, and navigation.

8. Adverse impact to formally listed state or federal threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat is prohibited.

9. This permit does not authorize adverse impacts to cultural, historical or archeological features or sites.

PART II

Duty to Reapply

Permittee is not authorized to discharge or conduct an activity that alters the properties of waters of the state after the expiration date of this permit. In order to receive authorization to discharge or to conduct an activity that alters the properties of waters of the state beyond the expiration date, the permittee shall submit such information and forms as are required to the director of the Division of Water Resources. Such applications must be properly signed and certified.

If any portion of the permitted activities, including the authorized impacts to water resources, compensatory mitigation requirements, or post-project monitoring is not completed before the expiration date of this permit the permittee must apply for permit extension or re-issuance. The permittee shall submit such information and forms as are required to the director of the Division of Water Resources at least ninety (90) days prior to its expiration date. Such applications must be properly signed and certified.

Property Rights

The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations.

Other Permits

This permit does not preclude requirements of other federal, state or local laws. This permit also serves as a state of Tennessee aquatic resource alteration permit (ARAP) pursuant to the Tennessee Water Quality Control Act of 1977 (T.C.A. §69-3-101 et seq.).

Other Information

If the permittee becomes aware that he/she failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the director, then he/she shall promptly submit such facts or information.

Changes Affecting the Permit

Transfer/Change of Ownership

1. This permit may be transferred to another party, provided there are no activity or project modifications, no pending enforcement actions, or any other changes which might affect the permit conditions contained in the permit, by the permittee if:

a. The permittee notifies the Director of the proposed transfer at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date;

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

b. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specified date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and contractual liability between them; and

c. The Director does not notify the current permittee and the new permittee, within 30 days, of his or her intent to modify, revoke, reissue, or terminate the permit, or require that a new application be filed rather than agreeing to the transfer of the permit.

2. The permittee must provide the following information to the division in their formal notice of intent to transfer ownership:

a. the permit number of the subject permit;

b. the effective date of the proposed transfer;

c. the name and address of the transferor;

d. the name and address of the transferee;

e. the names of the responsible parties for both the transferor and transferee;

f. a statement that the transferee assumes responsibility for the subject permit;

g. a statement that the transferor relinquishes responsibility for the subject permit;

h. the signatures of the responsible parties for both the transferor and transferee, and;

i. a statement regarding any proposed modifications to the permitted activities or project, its operations, or any other changes which might affect the permit conditions contained in the permit.

Change of Mailing Address

The permittee shall promptly provide to the director written notice of any change of mailing address. In the absence of such notice the original address of the permittee will be assumed to be correct.

Noncompliance

Effect of Noncompliance

All discharges shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of applicable state and federal laws and is grounds for enforcement action, permit termination, permit modification, or denial of permit reissuance.

Reporting of Noncompliance

24-Hour Reporting

1. In the case of any noncompliance which could cause a threat to public drinking supplies, or any other discharge which could constitute a threat to human health or the environment, the required notice of non-compliance shall be provided to the Division of Water Resources in the appropriate

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

Environmental Field Office within 24-hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. (The Environmental Field Office should be contacted for names and phone numbers of environmental response personnel).

2. A written submission must be provided within five (5) days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances unless this requirement is waived by the director on a case-by-case basis. The permittee shall provide the director with the following information:

a. A description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance;

b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and

c. The steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the non-complying discharge.

Scheduled Reporting

For instances of noncompliance which are not reported under subparagraph a.

above, the permittee shall report the noncompliance by contacting the permit coordinator, and provide all information concerning the steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the violation and the anticipated time the violation is expected to continue.

Adverse Impact

The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to the waters of Tennessee resulting from noncompliance with this permit, including but not limited to, accelerated or additional monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the noncompliance. It shall not be a defense for the permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

Liabilities

Civil and Criminal Liability

Nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. Notwithstanding this permit, the permittee shall remain liable for any damages sustained by the state of Tennessee, including but not limited to fish kills and losses of aquatic life and/or wildlife, as a result of the discharge of pollutants to any surface or subsurface waters. Additionally, notwithstanding this Permit, it shall be the responsibility of the permittee to conduct its discharge activities in a manner such that public or private nuisances or health hazards will not be created.

Liability under State Law

Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended.

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

Reopener:

This permit may be modified, suspended, or revoked for cause, including:

1. Violation of any of the terms or conditions of this permit or of T.C.A § 69-3-101 et.

seq.;

2. Obtaining the permit by misrepresentation or failing to disclose fully all relevant facts;

3. A change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent change in the conditions of this permit.

Appeal:

An appeal of this action may be made as provided in T.C.A. §69-3-105(i) and Rule 0400-04-05- .12 by submitting a petition for appeal:

1. The petition must be filed within THIRTY (30) DAYS after public notice of the issuance of the permit.

2. The petition must specify the provisions subject to appeal and the basis for the appeal.

3. The petition should be addressed to the technical secretary of the Tennessee Board of Water Quality, Oil and Gas at the following address: Ms. Tisha Benton, Director, Division of Water Resources, William R. Snodgrass - Tennessee Tower, 312 Rosa L.

Parks Avenue, 11th Floor, Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1534. Any hearing would be in accordance with T.C.A. §§69-3-110 and 4-5-301 et seq.

PART III

Notice of Determination:

Concern The future connection of the North Chickamauga Park greenway to the Chattanooga River Walk, in addition to the natural resource values of the TVA's Big Ridge Small Wild Area, may potentially be compromised by the disposal of the excavated rock.

Determination Upland disposal of dredged material is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. However, the proposed disposal site was identified as a spoil area in both the 1996 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the project (TVA) and the 2002 Final Supplement Environmental Impact Statement (Corps). The site has already been disturbed by placement of excavated material from 2007 through 2010. The project would result in short-term aesthetic impacts to the immediate construction area but the placement area is proposed to be covered with topsoil and seeded with native vegetation in the final stages of lock construction to make the area more aesthetically pleasing.

Concern The placement of rubble fill may leave several acres of prime location dangerous and unsuited for any use.

Determination Upland disposal of dredged material is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. The Corps’ responds that the work would not result in placement

§ 401 Water Quality Certification of dredged materials into any undisturbed natural areas as the placement area has already been used for disposal of material during construction of the cofferdam. The areas surrounding the placement site are not suitable locations for building development as they are all owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for the purposes of operating Chickamauga Lock and Dam.

Concern The hydrology of the wetlands adjacent to the disposal area may be negatively affected by the project.

Determination The wetland’s hydrology, either inflow or outflow, should not be affected by the disposal of material. The source of water or hydrology for the wetland is from the side opposite the disposal area, therefore the fill should not affect the wetlands hydrologic source.

The outlet flow from the wetland is to be avoided as well, therefore not affecting the wetland’s outflow.

Concern The excavated rock material may have some commercial value, thereby avoiding the necessity of disposal at the planned disposal site.

Determination Upland disposal of dredged material is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. The Corps’ responds that the proposed excavation and disposal associated with this project would be performed by a contractor. Although the disposal site was identified as the preferred alternative to placed dredged material, the contractor, in consultation with the Corps, would have the option to explore off-site locations to place the dredged material (including commercial vendor sites). These options would be continually evaluated throughout the life of the contract.

Concern There is a history of use of part of the disposal site as a firing range. Lead bullet contaminants may become so trapped by stone as to be unrecoverable for any future required site mitigation.

Determination The future use of the upland disposal site is generally beyond the authority of this water quality certification. However, based on available information, it appears that an area near the disposal site was used for firearms training/practice although the area was never formally designated as such. However, the target areas were located outside of the disposal site to the east.

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

General topographic location map

The photographs below shows the proposed excavation area within an existing cofferdam and disposal area.

Proposed Stability Measures

Appendix I

Maps - Permit Sketches - Other Illustrations or Data

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

Excavation Site: The location of the cofferdam maintenance is Nickajack Reservoir, an open water impoundment of the Tennessee River (mile 471.0) directly downstream of Chickamauga Dam. The construction area is within an existing cofferdam that has previously been excavated. The substrate consists of limestone bedrock with sparse amounts of rock and gravel that has accumulated since initial construction. Pictures of the lock floor after a dewatering event in 2012 are shown below.

Overview of cofferdam (dewatered)

Substrate in cofferdam

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

Disposal Site: The disposal area is a site approximately 4.5 acres in size and approximately 1,800’ northeast of Chickamauga Lock, near the left descending bank of North Chickamauga Creek. The disposal area was used up to 2012 during a previous excavation used to create the existing cofferdam area.

Chickamauga Lock Disposal Area Location Map

The site consists almost entirely of uplands, however the disposal area is bordered to the northeast by a forested wetland (WET-002), which discharges to an intermittent stream (STR- 001). STR-001 runs through the northern portion of the proposed disposal area for approximately 340 linear feet from east to west as shown in figures below. Based on previous records, the stream was created by changes in the diversion of water on the site from previous disposal activities. STR-001 begins from the drainage of WET-002 and flows across the disposal site into a riprapped ditch (approximately 106’) and then into a culvert (approximately 33’) before flowing off the site. One alternative under consideration (Alternative 2 – See Section 10; Figure 14), would use the entire disposal area, with the exception of the southwest corner to store excavated materials. However, under Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative), impacts to WET-002 and STR-001 would be avoided by this project. In the photographs below, it is important to note that the blue line represents the contractor work area for disposal of excavated materials, not the fill area, which is further discussed in Section 10.

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

Entire Disposal Area

STR-001 Baseline Condition Drawing

WET-002

WET-001

STR-001

STR-001

WET-002

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

The disposal of excavated material from within the cofferdam would permanently fill WET-001 resulting in 0.03 acre permanent loss of emergent wetlands.

An existing toe drain for Chickamauga Dam currently runs underneath the disposal area and empties into North Chickamauga Creek. To avoid damages to the toe drain associated with the extra weight of additional fill material, two alternatives are being considered. Alternative 1 would excavate and replace the existing toe drain in place with a stronger pipe of the same diameter that will be able to support the additional overburden weight. Alt 1 would result in the excavation and fill of 0.03 acre of emergent wetlands (WET-001), the same wetlands proposed to be filled during disposal activities. Realignment of the toe drain is a second alternative being considered (Alt 2). The realignment would result in the addition of a pipe from an existing manhole south of the disposal area and would convey water into North Chickamauga Creek, approximately 450’ linear feet downstream of the current outfall. Under Alt 2, the current toe drain and outfall would be left in place to collect any seepage from the northwest portion of the property. Although a new outfall would be constructed, the route of the new toe drain pipe is proposed totally in uplands and no waters of the State would be altered, other than a new outfall, which would empty into North Chickamauga Creek.

Plan for new toe drain pipe and outfall (Alt 2 below)

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

Photograph of WET-001

The proposed excavation would take place within an existing cofferdam structure and would change the bottom elevation within the cofferdam to varying degrees depending on the required founding elevations of the new concrete lock structure and the potential presence of bentonite clay formations. The resulting condition of the river bed within the cofferdam would be a solid bedrock bottom, much like the existing substrate, with varying depths. There would be no functional loss from the baseline conditions in the excavation area.

In the disposal area, impacts to WET-002 and STR-001 would be avoided. A 15-foot buffer would be left around WET-002 to minimize any potential indirect effects from the surrounding disposal activities. Either a realignment or replacement of an existing toe drain would occur.

Approximately 0.03 acre of emergent wetland (WET-001) would be permanently filled beneath the excavated material. Although a minor loss of function associated with WET-001 would occur, the functional capacity of the wetland is poor given its position on the landscape, disturbed soils and lack of habitat for wildlife. Due to the small size of proposed wetland impacts and the limited functions provided by WET-001, no compensatory mitigation is proposed for the 0.03 acre impact.

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

N

060 30 60 120FT

SCALE: 1’’= 60’

TRANSMISSION

LINES

ACCESS ROAD

RIGHT NAVIGATION

CHANNEL LINE

NICKAJACK LAKE

SCALE: 1" = 60’-0"

SITE PLAN

FLOW

F L

O W

R8 R6

R5 R4R9R10

R13 R12 R11

R14 R15

R18A R17A

R17R18

R16

R7

L12

L16 L15

L13

L14

L11 L10 L9 L8 L7 L6

L5 L4

U3

U2

M1

U3

U2 M1L17

Z 662.170

R O

C K

G R

A V

E L

AREA U/C

670.2

669.5

669.7

670.3671.9

674.5

673.8

673.8

673.7

673.4 672.4

672.2

671.9

671.5 671.7

671.3

663.1

FENCE U/C

ROCK/GRAVEL

ROCK/GRAVEL

ROCK/GRAVEL

679.1

697.8

697.8

684.4

684.9

696.8

695.5

661.2

668.1

669.1

640.5

639.5

640.1

640.1

640.4

640.9

639.5

639.3

655.1

657.5

672.4

671.9 677.7

673.9

669.8

670.2

678.7 679.8

671.4

665.3

666.9

666.2

664.3

680.9

682.8

682.5 683.3

681.5

680.4

697.7

697.3

680.3

679.8679.1

697.9

697.7

697.7

670.1

670.8

671.2

671.4

ROCK/GRAVEL

635.8

ROCKS

697.7

697.7

697.7

697.7

697.7

PROTECTION

CELL

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RR BRIDGE

(VERTICAL LIFT SPAN)

LEFT NAVIGATION

CHANNEL LINE

FLOW DEFLECTION DIKE

STA 15+00 D

STA 13+00

STA 11+00 D STA 9+00 D

STA 7+00 D

STA 5+00 D

STA 3+00 D

STA 1+00 D STA 0+00 STA 1+00 U

STA 3+00 U

STA 5+00 U

STA 8+00 U

{ 110’ x 600’ NEW LOCK

{ 60’ x 360’ EXISTING LOCK

DOWNSTREAM RIVER WALL

DOWNSTREAM LAND WALL

UPSTREAM RIVER WALL

UPSTREAM LAND WALL

SPILLWAY

{ EXISTING DAM AXIS

SPILLWAY APRON

BAFFLE WEIR

TN SR 153

BRIDGE

NEW LOCK

COFFERDAM

LOCK

N O R T

H

C

H I C

K A

M A

U G

A

C R E E

K

FLOW

T

S R

B

I

D G

E

TRANSMISSION

LINES

O

L

C K

S

N 282,036.8

E 2,198,923.4

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i l e a m e

P l o t

D t e

P l i m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W .d g n

:0

:3

P M

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C

W_TVA

---JDD--0

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

APR/10

JLD

O.V.

A.P.

B.T.

1" = 60’

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-01

61W520-01

O.V. A.P. B.T.

LOCK REPLACEMENT

SITE PLAN

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

645’-6"

SPAN UR-1

114’-6"

SPAN UR-2

124’-0"

SPAN UR-3

124’-0"

SPAN UR-4

124’-0"

SPAN UR-5

114’-6"

NOSE PIER

44’-6"

LUMINAIRE

HAND RAIL

(TYP)

LADDER

(TYP)

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

ACCESS HATCH

(TYP)

TOW HAULAGE

EQUIPMENT PAD

RETURN SHEAVE

S T

A

U

E

I

E R

S T

A

F A

C

E

E

A

E

A

E

A

E

A

T

A

N O

L I

H

CHECK POST

(TYP)

NOSE PIER

EL 682.5

NORMAL HIGH WATER

EL 675.0

NORMAL LOW WATER

UR-5T

UR-5B

EL 607.0

EL 591.0

EL 584.0

EL 585.0

DRILLED SHAFT

TIP ELEVATION (TYP)

EL 619.0

EL 605.0

RIVER BED

TOP OF ROCK

(CANNON)

TOP OF ROCK

(HERMITAGE)

EL 662.5

UR-4T

UR-4B

LADDER

(TYP)

HAND RAIL

(TYP)

LUMINAIRE

(TYP)

LADDER

(TYP)

UR-3T

UR-3B

UR-2T

UR-2B

LINE HOOK

(TYP)

UR-1T

UR-1B

EL 692.0

TOP OF FIXED WALL

EL 673.0

BOTTOM OF FIXED WALL

PLAN

SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"

ELEVATION

61W520-40

61W520-39

61W520-40

61W520-41

61W520-40

61W520-39

61W520-40

61W520-39 SIM

EL 540.0

N O

T E

NOTE 6

4’-6"

EXISTING

DAM MONOLITH

(R1) NOTE 5

61W520-47

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

020 10 20 40FT

SCALE: 1’’= 20’

N

FLOW

LUMINAIRE

(TYP) NOTE 8

{ LOCK

Y

P

FACE OF

CONCRETE

{ JOINT

FACE OF

MONOLITH

FACE OF

BEAM

HOSE

CABINET

(TYP)

NOTE 9

CHECK POST

TYPE 1

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

TOW

HAULAGE

RAIL

NOTE 4

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

EXISTING

DAM MONOLITH

(M1) NOTE 5A

61W520-93

17’-2�"

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i m e

P l t e

P l m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W .d g n

:0

:0

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C06

W_TVA

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

FEB/10

JLD

I.L.

A.P.

B.T.

1" = 20’

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-10

61W520-10

UPSTREAM RIVER WALL

PLAN & ELEVATION

FUTURE SKIRTS (TYP

EXCEPT NOTED)

THREE-WAY

SKIRT BRACKET

FUTURE SKIRTS

NOTES:

1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE SHAFT LOCATION

SHOWN FOR COST ESTIMATION ONLY. ACTUAL ROCK

ELEVATION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE.

2. TEMPORARY CASING SHALL BE FOUNDED 1 FOOT INTO THE

ROCK.

3. EACH EMBEDDED LENGTH OF SHAFT IN THE ROCK SHALL

NOT BE LESS THAN SHOWN.

4. SEE TOW HAULAGE SHEETS 64W514, 64W515, 64W521 TO

64W523 AND 64W531 FOR TOW HAULAGE DETAILS.

5. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 672.5.

6. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.

7. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,

SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.

8. FOR LIGHTING POSTS, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.

9. FOR HOSE CABINETS, SEE SHEET 67W443.

10. SKIRT INSERTS ARE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE SKIRTING OF

ALL SPANS. SEE SHEETS 61W520-80 AND 61W520-81 FOR

SKIRT BRACKET AND INSERT DETAILS. FOR UR-1T AND

UR-1B BEAMS, SEE SHEET 61W520-93 FOR THREE-WAY

SKIRT BRACKET.

2’-0"

2’-0"

{ THREE-WAY

SKIRT BRACKET

EL 662.5

2’-0" 2’-0"

2’-0" 2’-0"

2’-0" 2’-0"

2’-0" 2’-0"

{ BRACKET (TYP) { BRACKET (TYP)

SKIRTS

TYPE "A" FUTURE

SKIRTS

TYPE "A" FUTURE

TYPE "B" FUTURE SKIRTS

TYPE "A" FUTURE

TYPE "A" FUTURE

TYPE "A" FUTURE

TYPE "A" FUTURE SKIRTS

{ SKIRT BRACKET

TYPE "B" SKIRT

TYPE "B" FUTURE SKIRTS TYPE "B" SKIRT

I.L. A.P. B.T.

LOCK REPLACEMENT

GOVERNMENT

FURNISHED

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

HAND RAIL

ACCESS HATCH

(TYP)

149’-6"

SPAN UL-1

105’-0"

S T

A

N O

L I

T H

S T

A

E R

HAND RAIL

(TYP)

EL 692.0

TOP OF FIXED WALL

EL 673.0

BOTTOM OF FIXED WALL

UL-1T

UL-1B

LUMINAIRE

EL 682.5

NORMAL HIGH WATER

EL 675.0

NORMAL LOW WATER

EL 662.5

EL 565.0

EL 609.0

EL 611.0

DRILLED SHAFT TIP ELEVATION

(SEE NOTES)

RIVER BED

TOP OF ROCK

(CANNON)

TOP OF ROCK

(HERMITAGE)

PLAN

ELEVATION

CHECK POST

TYPE 1 (TYP)

CHECK POST

TYPE 1 (TYP)

N O

T E

NOTE 6

4’-6"

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

020 10 20 40FT

SCALE: 1’’= 20’

FLOW

N

44’-6"

S T

A

N O

L I

T H

LUMINAIRE

NOTE 4

FACE OF

MONOLITH

FACE OF

BEAM

Y

P

FACE OF

CONCRETE

EXISTING

DAM MONOLITH

(M1) NOTE 5

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i m e

P l t e

P l m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W .d g n

:0

:0

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C06

W_TVA

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

FEB/10

JLD

I.L.

A.P.

B.T.

1" = 20’

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-11

61W520-11

UPSTREAM LAND WALL

PLAN & ELEVATION

NOTES:

1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE SHAFT LOCATION

SHOWN FOR COST ESTIMATION ONLY. ACTUAL ROCK

ELEVATION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE.

2. TEMPORARY CASING SHALL BE FOUND 1 FOOT INTO THE

ROCK.

3. EACH EMBEDDED LENGTH OF SHAFT IN THE ROCK SHALL

NOT BE LESS THAN SHOWN.

4. FOR LIGHTING POST, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.

5. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 672.5.

6. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.

7. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,

SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.

8. SKIRT INSERTS ARE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE SKIRTS.

SEE SHEETS 61W520-80 AND 61W521-81 FOR SKIRT

BRACKET AND INSERT DETAILS.

FUTURE SKIRTS

(TYP)

SKIRT

TYPE "A"

2’-0"

2’-0"

SKIRTS SEE NOTE 8

TYPE "A" FUTURE

{ SKIRT BRACKET { SKIRT BRACKET

TYPE "B" FUTURE

SKIRTS SEE NOTE 8

TYPE "A" FUTURE

SKIRTS SEE NOTE 8

SKIRT

EXISTING

DAM MONOLITH

(M1) NOTE 5

LOCK REPLACEMENT

I.L. A.P. B.T.

GOVERNMENT

FURNISHED

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

RESTRAINER

RR BRIDGE

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

LADDER

43’-6"

SPAN DR-3

110’-6"

SPAN DR-2

120’-0"

SPAN DR-1

110’-6"

S T

A

A

N O

L I

T

E

A

T

A

A

E R

S T

A

E R

GUARD RAIL

(TYP)

DR-1M

DR-1T

DR-1B

EL 630.0

BOTTOM OF BEAM

TOP OF ROCK

(HERMITAGE)

DR-2M

DR-2T

DR-2B

LUMINAIRE

(TYP)

LINE HOOK

(TYP)

EL 616.0

EL 691.0

RR BRIDGE

LADDER

DR-3M

DR-3T

RIVERBED AND

TOP OF ROCK

(CANNON)

DR-3B

LUMINAIRE

(TYP)

NOSE PIER

EL 616.0

EL 600.0

EL 658.0

TOP OF FIXED WALL

EL 644.0

NORMAL HIGH WATER

EL 632.0

NORMAL LOW WATER

PLAN

SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"

SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"

ELEVATION

LOCK MONOLITH

(R18) NOTE 2

LOCK MONOLITH

(R18) NOTE 2

N O

T E

NOTE 3

4’-6"

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

CHECK POST

TYPE 1

CHECK POST

TYPE 1

CHECK POST

TYPE 1

EL 616.0

(NOTE 1, TYP)

020 10 20 40FT

SCALE: 1’’= 20’

FLOW

E

A

LUMINAIRE

(TYP) NOTE 4

Y

P

FACE OF

CONCRETE

FACE OF

MONOLITH

FACE OF

BEAM

HOSE CABINET

NOTE 6

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i m e

P l t e

P l m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W .d g n

:0

:1

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C06

W_TVA

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

FEB/10

JLD

I.L.

A.P.

B.T.

1" = 20’

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-12

61W520-12

DOWNSTREAM RIVER WALL

PLAN & ELEVATION

NOTES:

1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE PIER LOCATIONS

IS EL 618.0. STEEL SHELL SHALL BE FOUNDED AT

ELEVATION SHOWN. SETTING PIPE PILES NOT SHOWN,

SEE SHEET 61W520-15 FOR LOCATION OF SETTING PIPE PILES

AND SHEETS 61W520-36 AND 61W520-52 FOR SETTING PIPE

PILE DETAILS.

2. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 629.5.

3. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.

4. FOR LIGHTING POSTS, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.

5. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,

SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.

6. FOR HOSE CABINET, SEE SHEET 67W443.

7. SKIRT INSERTS ARE PROVIDED FOR FUTURE SKIRTING OF ALL

SPANS. SEE SHEETS 61W520-80 AND 61W520-81 FOR SKIRT

BRACKET AND INSERT DETAILS.

8. ADJUST FUTURE SKIRT HEIGHT TO ACCOMMODATE SITE CONDITIONS

AS REQUIRED.

FUTURE SKIRTS

(TYP)

2’-9"TYPE "A" SKIRTS17’-9"17’-0"

SKIRTS

TYPE "B"

SKIRTS

TYPE "A"17’-9" 17’-0"2’-9" TYPE "A" SKIRTS

SKIRTS

TYPE "A"

{ SKIRT BRACKET (TYP.)

{ SKIRT

BRACKET

(TYP.)

LOCK REPLACEMENT

I.L. A.P. B.T.

GOVERNMENT

FURNISHED

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

43’-6"

SPAN DL-1

95’-6"

SPAN DL-2

105’-0"

SPAN DL-3

105’-0"

SPAN DL-4

120’-0"

SPAN DL-5

120’-0"

SPAN DL-6

120’-0"

SPAN DL-7

110’-6"

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

LADDER

(TYP)

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

RR BRIDGE

LADDER

(TYP)

S T

A

E R

S T

A

A

E

E

A

E

A

E

A

E

A

E

A

E

A

T

A

A

N O

L I

T H

CHECK POST

(TYP)

EL 658.0

TOP OF NOSE PIER AND

TOP OF FIXED WALL

DL-7T

DL-7M

DL-7B

EL 616.0

EL 644.0

NORMAL HIGH WATER

EL 632.0

NORMAL LOW WATER

EL 600.0

EL 616.0

LADDER

(TYP)

HAND RAIL

(TYP)

DL-6T

DL-6M

LUMINAIRE

(TYP)

DL-6B

DL-5B

DL-5M

DL-5T

DL-4T

DL-4M

DL-4B

RR BRIDGE

EL 691.0

EL 630.0

BOTTOM OF BEAM

EL 616.0

LADDER

(TYP)

DL-3T

DL-3M

DL-3B

EL 616.0

DL-2B

DL-2T

DL-2M

LINE HOOK

(TYP)

EL 616.0

DL-1T

DL-1M

DL-1B

LADDER

(TYP)

EL 616.0

TOP OF ROCK

(HERMITAGE)

PLAN

SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"

ELEVATION

SCALE: 1" = 20’-0"

LOCK MONOLITH

(L17) NOTE 2

LOCK MONOLITH

(L17) NOTE 2

N O

T E

NOTE 3

4’-6"

RESTRAINER

(TYP)

CHECK POST

(TYPE 1)

EL 616.0

(NOTE 1, TYP)

020 10 20 40FT

SCALE: 1’’= 20’

N

FLOW

LUMINAIRE

(TYP) NOTE 6

FACE OF

MONOLITH

FACE OF

BEAM

Y

P

FACE OF

CONCRETE

HOSE CABINET

(TYP)

NOTE 7

CHECK POST

TYPE 2 CHECK POST

TYPE 2

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

CHECK POST

TYPE 2

TOW HAULAGE RAIL

NOTE 5

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

NOTES:

1. APPROXIMATE ROCK ELEVATION AT THE PIER LOCATIONS

IS EL 618.0. STEEL SHELL SHALL BE FOUNDED AT

ELEVATION SHOWN. SETTING PIPE PILES NOT SHOWN,

SEE SHEET 61W520-15 FOR LOCATION OF SETTING PIPE PILES

AND SHEETS 61W520-36 AND 61W520-52 FOR SETTING PIPE

PILE DETAILS.

2. BEAM SEAT ELEVATION ON MONOLITH IS AT EL 629.5.

3. MONOLITH BLOCK-OUT DIMENSION.

4. SIGNS LOCATED ON APPROACH WALLS NOT SHOWN,

SEE SHEET 61W520-86 FOR APPROACH WALL SIGN PLAN.

5. SEE TOW HAULAGE SHEETS 64W510, 64W511, 64W516, 64W517,

64W523 AND 64W531 FOR TOW HAULAGE DETAILS.

6. FOR LIGHTING POSTS, SEE SHEETS 65W418 THRU 65W421.

7. FOR HOSE CABINETS, SEE SHEET 67W443.

APPROXIMATE

TOP OF ROCK

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i m e

P l t e

P l m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W

.d g n

:0

:1

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C06

W_TVA

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

APR/10

JLD

I.L.

A.P.

B.T.

1" = 20’

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-13

61W520-13

I.L. A.P. B.T.

LOCK REPLACEMENT

DOWNSTREAM LAND WALL

PLAN & ELEVATION

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

X

M

S T

A

SHAFT

SHAFT

FACE OF LOCK

SHAFT

FACE OF LOCK

STA 0+00 STA 1+00 U STA 2+00 U STA 3+00 U STA 4+00 U STA 5+00 U STA 6+00 U STA 7+00 U STA 8+00 U

{ LOCK

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

SHAFT

SCALE: 1" = 30’-0"

FOUNDATION PLAN

A F

T

S T

A

A F

T

S T

A

A F

T

S T

A

A F

T

S T

A

030 15 30 60FT

SCALE: 1’’= 30’

N

FLOW

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i m e

P l t e

P l m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W

.d g n

:0

:2

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C06

W_TVA

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

APR/10

JLD

I.L.

A.P.

B.T.

1" = 30’

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-14

61W520-14

SHAFT SCHEDULE

SHAFT

NO. TYPE

OFFSET

{ LOCK

STATION NORTHING EASTING

STA 2+67.36 U

STA 3+91.36 U

STA 5+15.36 U

STA 6+39.36 U

STA 7+63.86 U

STA 7+89.36 U

STA 2+67.86 U

STA 2+93.36 U

62.0’ R

85.0’ R

62.0’ R

85.0’ R

62.0’ R

85.0’ R

62.0’ R

85.0’ R

64.04’ R

88.04’ R

73.32’ R

64.04’ L

88.04’ L

73.32’ L

SHAFT

281985.1 2199192.9

281962.1 2199193.8

281989.9 2199316.8

281966.9 2199317.7

281994.7 2199440.7

281971.7 2199441.6

281999.5 2199564.6

281976.5 2199565.5

282002.3 2199689.1

281978.3 2199690.0

281993.9 2199714.9

282111.1 2199188.5

282135.1 2199187.6

282121.4 2199213.7

NOTE:

1. FOR SHAFT REINFORCEMENT SEE SHEETS 61W520-18,

61W520-19 AND 61W520-20.

2. STA 0+00

NORTHING 282036.77

EASTING 2198923.34

NOTE: "R" INDICATES RIVERWARD DIRECTION

"L" INDICATES LANDWARD DIRECTION

I.L. A.P. B.T.

LOCK REPLACEMENT

UPSTREAM WALLS

FOUNDATION PLAN

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

25’-6"

E

E R

S T

A

T

A

NOSE PIER

SHELL STRUCTURE

FACE OF LOCK

STA 16+00 D STA 15+00 D STA 14+00 D STA 13+00 D STA 12+00 D STA 11+00 D

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

T

A

A

N O

L I

T H

S T

A

LOWER GATE

PINTLES

EXISTING RAIL ROAD

BRIDGE PIER

INTERMEDIATE PIER

SHELL STRUCTURE

(TYP)

(TYP)

10’-3"

(TYP)

10’-3"

FACE OF LOCK

{ PIER

STA 10+00 D STA 9+00 D STA 8+00 D STA 7+00 D

FACE OF LOCKFACE OF LOCK

{ PIER

25’-6"

E

E R

S T

A

T

A

NOSE PIER

SHELL STRUCTURE

EXISTING RAIL ROAD

BRIDGE PIER

E R

S T

A

E R

S T

A

SCALE: 1" = 30’-0"

FOUNDATION PLAN

3’} STEEL

PIPE PILE

(TYP, NOTE 1)

030 15 30 60FT

SCALE: 1’’= 30’

N

FLOW

NOTE:

1. FOR PIPE PILE DETAILS SEE SHEET 61W520-52.

2. FOR PIPE PILE DETAILS SEE SHEET 61W520-36.

S T

A

3’} I.D. STEEL

PIPE PILE

(TYP, NOTE 2)

S T

A

A

N O

L I

T H

SCALE:

DO NOT ALTER MANUALLY

C.A.D. DRAWING

ISSUED BY:

R

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FOSSIL AND HYDRO ENGINEERING

AUTOCAD R

DATE

PLOT FACTOR:

REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

AS CONST

EXCEPT AS NOTED

NO.

REV.

DATE

R

R

DRWNDSGN CHKD RVWDSUPV APPD

PROJECT

ISSD

ID

CD

REV

DISCIPLINE

INTERFACE

US Army Corps of Engineers

Nashville District

SUBMITTED BY:

APPROVED BY:

F i m e

P l t e

P l m e

L

H c a d d s t r u c t

S h e e t s

W

.d g n

:0

:2

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

CHIEF, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

H

F

G

E

3 4 5 6

D

C

B

A

2 3 4 5 6

7 8

REV NO.TASK COMPLETED BY:

F

E

7 8 9 10

D

C

B

11 12

A

C

C06

W_TVA

JAN

INITIAL ISSUE

CHICKAMAUGA PROJECT

CHIEF, CIVIL DESIGN BRANCH

APR/10

JLD

I.L.

A.P.

B.T.

APPROACH WALLS

MICHAEL F. ZOCCOLA P.E.

BARNEY DAVIS JR. P.E.

JAMES A. NIZNIK JOHNATHAN D. DUNCAN JENNIFER L. DICKERSON

INCA ENGINEERS

61W520-15

61W520-15

1"= 30’

PILE SCHEDULE

NO.

OFFSET

{ LOCK

STATION NORTHING EASTING

STA 9+46.50 D 59.32’ R

73.23’ R

2197979.8

2197990.6

2197970.1

2197859.9

2197870.7

2197850.2

2197740.7

2197741.6

2197715.6

2198035.2

2198024.4

2198044.9

2197930.3

2197919.5

15 2197940.0

16 2197825.4

17 2197814.6

18 2197835.1

19 2197705.5

20 2197694.7

21 2197715.2

22 2197585.5

23 2197574.8

24 2197595.3

25 2197465.6

26 2197454.9

27 2197475.3

29 2197346.0

30 2197320.2

28 2197345.1

PILE

STA 9+36.25 D

73.23’ R

59.32’ R

STA 9+56.75 D

STA 10+66.50 D

73.23’ RSTA 10+56.25 D

STA 10+76.75 D 73.23’ R

STA 11+86.00 D 64.00’ R

STA 11+86.00 D 88.00’ R

STA 12+11.50 D 73.28’ R

STA 8+86.50 D 59.32’ L

STA 8+96.75 D 73.23’ L

STA 8+76.25 D 73.23’ L

STA 9+91.50 D 59.32’ L

73.23’ LSTA 10+1.75 D

STA 9+81.25 D 73.23’ L

STA 10+96.50 D 59.32’ L

STA 11+6.75 D 73.23’ L

73.23’ LSTA 10+86.25 D

STA 12+16.50 D 59.32’ L

73.23’ LSTA 12+26.75 D

73.23’ LSTA 12+6.25 D

59.32’ LSTA 13+36.50 D

73.23’ LSTA 13+46.75 D

STA 13+26.25 D 73.23’ L

59.32’ LSTA 14+56.50 D

73.23’ LSTA 14+66.75 D

73.23’ LSTA 14+46.25 D

64.00’ LSTA 15+76.00 D

STA 16+1.50 D 73.28’ L

STA 15+76.00 D 88.00’ L

PILE

PILEPILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

PILE

NOTE: "R" INDICATES RIVERWARD DIRECTION

"L" INDICATES LANDWARD DIRECTION

281941.0

281927.5

281926.7

281936.3

281922.8

281922.0

281927.1

281903.1

281916.8

282061.8

282075.3

282076.1

282057.8

282071.3

282072.1

282053.7

282067.2

282068.0

282049.1

282062.6

282063.4

282044.5

282058.0

282058.8

282039.8

282053.3

282054.1

282064.0

282040.0

282048.3

I.L. A.P. B.T.

LOCK REPLACEMENT

DOWNSTREAM WALLS

FOUNDATION PLAN

§ 401 Water Quality Certification

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .