W912LR22R6058 Evaluating Factors.pdf
PDF 146 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PRNG Medical Readiness Events Services
- Solicitation number
- W912LR22R6058
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for medical readiness event services for the Puerto Rico Army National Guard Medical Command. The requirement includes providing all necessary contractors to complete full periodic health assessments, soldier readiness programs, and physical exam requirements. The period of performance is one base year from September 2022 to May 2023, with three one-year option periods through May 2026. The award will be a firm fixed-price contract set aside for women-owned small businesses. The NAICS code is 541611 with a size standard of $16.5 million. Quotes are due by August 23, 2022 and must be emailed to the point of contact provided. Evaluation criteria include past performance, experience, corporate resources, quality control plan, and price. The selection will be made based on the proposal offering the best overall value to the government considering both technical merit and total price.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912LR22R6058 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| W912LR22R6058 Synopsis.pdf | ||
| W912LR22R6058 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MEDICAL READINESS EVENTS SERVICES
SOLICITATION W912LR22R6058
EVALUATING FACTORS
GENERAL
The major evaluation factors for the Solicitation include technical (which encompasses experience, corporate and human resources, quality control and past performance factors) and cost/price factors. Although technical factors are of paramount consideration in the award of the contract, cost/price is also important to the overall contract award decision. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. In any case, the Government reserves the right to make award(s) to that offeror whose proposal provides the best overall value to the Government.
Offerors are advised that award will be made to that offeror whose proposal provides the combination of features that offers the best or greatest overall value to the Government. The Government is more concerned with obtaining performance capability superiority rather than lowest overall cost. However, the Government will not make an award at a significantly higher overall cost to the Government to achieve only slightly superior performance.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
The criteria below are listed in the order of relative importance with weights assigned for evaluation purposes.
A. Past Performance/Experience
a) Past Performance
b) Experience
c) Certifications
B. Corporate and Human Resources
a) Corporate
b) Management Plan
c) Logistics
d) Staffing Plan
e) Training Plan
f) Criteria for Selecting Staff
C. Quality Control Program
a) Quality Assurance Plan
b) Quality Assurance Checklists
COST/PRICE FACTORS:
Offeror(s) cost/price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. The Independent Government Estimate will be used to determine reasonableness.
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS:
It is anticipated that any contract awarded from this Solicitation will contain option provision(s).
In accordance with FAR clause 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options, (July 1990) the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by addition the total price for all options to the total price of the basic requirement, except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government’s best interests. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s)
SELECTION FOR AWARD:
Offeror should be aware that the Government shall perform a best value analysis and the selection for award shall be made to the Offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government, taking into consideration the technical factors listed above and the total proposed price across all contract periods.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .