W912LP-23-R-0001 Questions and Answers v3.pdf

Solicitation Number: W912LP-23-R-0001

Iowa Construction MATOC

Questions & Answers v3

Q1. Reference Solicitation, Section 00 22 16, paragraph 3.1.1.4, Relevancy:

a. Please verify that it is the award value and not the completed value.

b. On the Roof Installation or Repair:

i. Can it be a new roof on an addition?

ii. Is the award value the value of the roof or the overall project? For example, will a project qualify if the overall project value is $3,000,000.00 with a roof replacement of $125,000.00?

c. On the HVAC project:

i. Can it be an HVAC project on an addition?

ii. Is the award value the value of the HVAC or the overall project?

A1.

a. Award value means the value of the award, not the completed value.

b. On the Roof Installation or Repair:

i. Solicitation Section 00 22 16, Paragraph 3.1.1.4.2. states, “if submitting a general renovation project that included roofing, offeror shall clearly specify the dollar value attributed to roofing.”

Therefore, a project for an addition that includes a new roof may be submitted to demonstrate this experience.

ii. The award value is for the total award. The value attributed to roofing shall be at least $100,000.00.

c. On the HVAC project:

i. Solicitation Section 00 22 16, Paragraph 3.1.1.4.3. states, “if submitting a general renovation project that included construction, repair or alteration of a mechanical system (e.g., HVAC systems or controls), offeror shall clearly specify the dollar value attributed to mechanical systems.” Therefore, a project for an addition that includes HVAC may be submitted to demonstrate this experience.

ii. The award value is for the total award. The value attributed to construction, repair or alteration of a mechanical system shall be at least $50,000.00.

Q2. Reference Solicitation, Section 00 22 16, paragraph 3.2.3, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ):

The completed PPQ forms & rating sheets are due 5 days before the date proposals are due. Is that working days or calendar days?

A2. The PPQ forms and rating sheets are due no later than five (5) calendar days before the date proposals are due.

Answers A1 and A2 will be incorporated into Solicitation Amendment 0001.

Q3. We are accustomed to submitting proposals for MATOC contracts which include a Seed Project to price. Can you verify if a Seed Project is incorporated into this solicitation?

A3. This MATOC solicitation does not include a Seed Project. Solicitation Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.1.1. states, “Awards will be made to all qualified offerors in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.304(c)(1)(ii)(A).” See excerpt below.

“15.304 Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.

(ii) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3206(c), for DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard—

(A) The contracting officer may choose not to include price or cost as an evaluation factor for award when a solicitation—

(1) Has an estimated value above the simplified acquisition threshold;

(2) Will result in multiple-award contracts (see subpart 16.5) that are for the same or similar services; and

(3) States that the Government intends to make an award to each and all qualifying offerors (see 2.101).”

Q4. Reference Solicitation Section 00 21 16, paragraph 3.3.4, what font type is allowed (Times Roman, Arial or some other font)?

A4. There is no specific font type required, as long as it is legible in the minimum font size of 10.

Q5. Where can contractors get assistance with PIEE Solicitation Module if they still have questions after reviewing the guide and web-based training linked on the SAM.gov Solicitation Notice?

A5. Contact Vendor Customer Support via the link on PIEE (https://piee.eb.mil/xhtml/unauth/web/homepage/vendorCustomerSupport.xhtml) or contact the APEX Accelerators (formerly PTACs) at https://www.aptac-us.org/contracting-assistance/.

Q6. There is not individual task order CPARS evaluations, only evaluations for each year of the MATOC. Will that be sufficient for the Past Performance on the task orders? If not, who do we send the Past Performance Questionnaire to?

A6. CPARS evaluations for a base MATOC are not sufficient to use as past performance submissions. If there are no CPARS evaluations that correspond to the projects submitted for Factor 1, offerors should follow instructions in the Solicitation Amendment 0001, Section 00 22 16, paragraph 3.2.3.

Q7. Can we use three different projects from the same owner as long as they have separate past performance submissions?

A7. Yes

Q8. After looking at further detail in the solicitation about the Iowa Construction MATOC (W912LP23R0001), are you wanting this submission to be in SF330 format or no? Are you also wanting us to submit resumes for the firms involved? I don’t see anything in the solicitation about key disciplines or roles.

A8. This solicitation is for Construction services, not Architect & Engineering Services. Proposals shall be submitted per the instructions provided in the solicitation, Sections 00 21 16 and 00 22 16.

///LAST ITEM///

https://piee.eb.mil/xhtml/unauth/web/homepage/vendorCustomerSupport.xhtml https://www.aptac-us.org/contracting-assistance/