RFP_W912LP-17-R-0001_QandA.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DAVENPORT READINESS CENTER Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912LP-17-R-0001
About this file
Reference attached document "RFP_W912LP-17-R-0001_Q&A" for questions that have been received to date. (4/27/2017)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Davenport_Information_Request_Form.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions & Answers
Solicitation W912LP-17-R-0001
Project No. 190025, Project Title: National Guard Readiness Center – Davenport, Iowa
Q1. We have been asked by a few different generals to provide reference questionnaires to our customers for projects for the upcoming Davenport Readiness Center. Would it be possible to when they send back the completed questionnaire that it doesn’t specify the general contractor? This way our customer is not having to complete the questionnaire for us multiple times for the different general contractors?
A1. Before I answer the question I would like to drawn your attention and the general contractor's attention to a couple sections of the RFP:
- Section 00110, paragraph 4.2.2 - This Subfactor outlines the Design-Build Contractor's team experience. Contractor are requested to provide a narrative of projects that demonstrate the team's experience with performance-based design build projects. It is possible the Design-Build firms are requesting your information to demonstrate the experience your firm brings to the team. Note: The intent of this subfactor is to access the experience of the lead design personnel and lead construction personnel with design-build projects, but subparagraph 4.2.2.5 requests offerors to discuss previous projects completed by the Design Build team proposed for this project. If your firm has completed design-build projects with the Offeror in the past and you are part of the same team it may be beneficial to highlight that acquisition.
- Section 00110, Paragraph 4.3.4 related to the Past Performance submission states, "... construction subcontractors may be listed/discussed but are not required or desired in Phase One..."
- Section 00110, Paragraph 4.3.5.2 related to the Past Performance submission states, "Subcontractor/Teaming Partners (applicable to design team members and subcontractors to be utilized on the design and oversight team)..." Without knowing the intent of the Offeror, it would be easy to say the answer related to the Past Performance submission would be that you are not required to provide any information on Past Performance; but if the intent of the Offeror is to highlight your firm as part of the oversight team, the answer may be different.
- Section 00110, Paragraph 4.3.6 related to the Past Performance submission states, "Offerors lacking relevant past/present performance experience may submit information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement if such information is relevant to this acquisition...." If your firm has a lot of Design-Build experience and the Offeror lacks some experience, highlighting your firm's experience with design-build could add to the team's overall experience.
Some offerors may have a clearly defined team, including its subcontractors, for construction while others may wait until a later date to define their construction subcontractors. Both are acceptable approaches. As part of the Phase One evaluation, it is the desire of the Government to understand the design team members, lead construction personnel as outlined in the solicitation, and subcontractors to be utilized on the design and oversight team. Depending how the Offeror intends to highlight the information provided by your firm, it may or may not be beneficial in the Phase One proposal.
To respond to the specific question, each past performance questionnaire shall include the general contractors name(s), I would recommend adding each general contractor that has requested you provide references under Offeror Name.
4/27/2017 12:44 PM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .