PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 192 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Full Food Service Camp Guernsey DFAC
- Solicitation number
- W912L3-14-R-0004
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation_Instructions.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions_and_Answers_in_regards_to_W912L3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 14-R-0004_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| Evaluation_Instructions.doc | DOC document | |
| 14-R-0004_amendment.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers_in_regards_to_W912L3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 14-R-0004_Current.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
E V S N M U
Exceptional/
High Confidence
Very Good/
Significant
Confidence
Satisfactory/
Confident
Neutral/
Unknown
Confidence
Marginal/ Little
Confidence
Unsatisfactory/
No Confidence
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the
Governments benefit.
Problems, if any were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the
Governments benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met contract requirements.
There were some minor problems, and corrective actions taken bu the contractor were satisfactory.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance did not meet contractual requirements.
There were serious problems, and the contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
1. Technical Qualification/ Experience: How well de the contractor
2. Management Effectiveness: To what extent did the contractor
a. Handle staff integrity issues, personnel retention and personnel replacement?
a. Demonstrate knowledge and comply with applicable regualtions and policies such as TB MED 530, AR 30-22, DA PAM 30-22 and applicable state standards?
b. Respond to wide variences in headcount on short notice?
c. Maintain required cleanliness standards?
d. Comply with the contract menu reqirements?
e. Provide meals that satisfied the diners in terms of taste, portion size and variety of choices?
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
E V S N M U
3. Quality Cotrol: To what extent did the contractor
Would you recommend to the Government to award a similar contract to this contractor?
g. Did the contractor identify problems as they occurred?
4. Briefly describe the contractor's predominant Strengths and/ or Weaknesses:
a. Adhere to responsiveness/ timeliness relative to performance?
b. Solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Government counterparts?
c. Display initiative in meeting requirements?
d. Display responsiveness/ timeliness relative to settling customer complaints?
e. Correct deficiencies in a timely manner and persuant to their quality control procedures?
f. Effectively interface with the Government's staff?
b. Allow contract manager sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during contract performance?
c. Ensure compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations?
d. Was the contract manager consistently available during contract performance?
e. Cooperate with Government personnel after award.
f. How would you rate the contractors overall management effectiveness?
ONCE COMPLETED THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE FOR THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
If no please provide reason/s why
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .