MDARNG_Laundry_Services_-_70th_Rgt_&_RRB_RSP_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.docx

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for MDARNG HQ 70th Regiment RTI and R&R- RSP Laundry Service

1. Background: All uniformed students and initial entry trainees are required to have suitable, safe and clean bedding material. The government will monitor progress and efficiency of the contractor during the contract period. Contractor will develop routine spot checks to ensure cleaning standards are inhered to.

1.2 Vision: All uniformed students and initial entry trainees have suitable, safe and clean bedding material.

1.3 Mission: To provide laundry services

2. Purpose: This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan is a government-developed document used to determine if the contractor’s performance meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The QASP establishes procedures on how this assessment/inspection process will be conducted. It provides the detailed process for a continuous oversight process:

- What will be monitored

- How monitoring will take place

- Who will conduct the monitoring

- How monitoring efforts and results will be documented

2.1 The contractor is responsible for implementing and delivering performance that meets contract standards using its Quality Control Plan. The QASP provides the structure for the government’s surveillance of the contractor’s performance to assure that it meets contract standards. It is the government’s responsibility to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating contractor performance.

2.2 The QASP is not part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the contractor’s quality control plan. This QASP is a living document. Flexibility in the QASP is required to allow for an increase or decrease in the level of surveillance necessary based on contractor performance.

2.3 The government may provide a copy of the QASP to the contractor to facilitate open communication. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances might occur that are outside the control of the contractor.

2.4 Bottom line, the QASP should ensure early identification and resolution of performance issues to minimize impact on mission performance.

2.4.1 Authority

Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Part 46 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Inspection of Services clauses, which provide for inspection, acceptance and documentation of the service called for in the contract or order. This acceptance is to be executed by the contracting officer or a duly authorized representative.

2.4.2 Roles and Responsibilities

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

2.4.2.1 Program/Project Manager (PM) – The PM (if the individual’s supervisor) nominates (or request the individual’s supervisory nominate the COR using VCE-COR or as directed by the Contracting Officer based upon the dollar value of the action. The PM/Supervisor ensures the COR is meets all COR training requirement outlined by the Contracting Office for the action before taking action regarding the nomination of the COR. The contract shall not be awarded until a qualified COR is appointed in writing by the Contracting Officer. The PM/Supervisor is not authorized to perform any COR duties but provides support to help the COR properly provide the necessary federal government oversight needed. The PM/Supervisor is required to include the performance of the COR in the COR/s annual performance rating. While the PM may serve as a direct conduit to provide Government guidance and feedback to thru the COR to the Contractor on technical matters, they are not empowered to make any contractual commitments or any contract changes on the government’s behalf. It is highly recommended the PM/Supervisor also nominate an alternate COR.

2.4.2.2 Contracting Officer (KO) – The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also ensure the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. Determine the final assessment of the contractor’s performance.

2.4.2.3 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) The COR is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor’s performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process. The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor’s actual performance. If required to use VCE-COR by the Contracting Officer, the COR will always make sure these records are accurately and timely uploaded to the VCE-COR system. The purpose is to ensure the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the KO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment (or more frequently as directed by the Contracting Officer) to the KO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for documenting contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf. The COR shall meet with the KO periodically as directed (usually monthly or quarterly at a minimum) to discuss the CORs performance. These meeting are in addition to the progress and similar type meeting involving at a minimum the contractor, COR and KO. The COR and alternate as applicable should communicate frequently to ensure both are aware of the current on-going oversight status and contract performance status.

3.0 Government Contract Surveillance

The goal of the QASP is to ensure contractor performance is effectively monitored and documented. The COR is responsible for maintaining quality assurance surveillance for the federal government. The COR will ensure monthly quality assurance inspections are accomplished accurately and timely. All records shall be uploaded to VCE-COR as applicable.

4.0. Surveillance Matrix: None

4.1 Performance Rating Definitions

In evaluating the quality of contractor’s performance, the following performance ratings may be used.

Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performs surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor’s performance as it relates to the performance element standards.

4.2 Performance Assessment Report (see Attachment 1)

Yellow Yes, performance and technical specifications are currently being met at the minimum AQL, but the following service / deliverable needs contractor attention. The Customer must identify what component of the deliverable and/or service requires attention.

Red No, performance and technical specifications are not met at AQL and the following service / deliverable needs immediate contractor resolution. The Customer must identify what component of the deliverable and/or service is below the minimum AQL.

Attachment 1: Performance Evaluation Worksheet

Edgewood

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW WORKSHEET

Performance Rating

Deliverable/Service

Date

Deliver and Pick-Up Laundry at set Time/Date/Location

Yellow

Red

Launder, Clean, Fold, Separate and Label Bags

Yellow

Red

Flexibility and availability

Yellow

Red

Period of Performance: From ___________________to_________________ Reimbursable Expenses: (include receipts) _______ Travel_______ (include approval sheet) Approved by: Date:

(SFC Cory Rolon 410-612- 0057 corey.j.rolon.mil@mail.mil )

4.3 Corrective Action Report (CAR) (See attachment 2)

Used identify, document and resolve issues or performance concerns/failures.

Attachment 2: Corrective Action Report (CAR)

CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)

(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)

1. CONTRACTOR

2. CONTRACT NUMBER

3. TYPE OF SERVICES

4. FUNCTIONAL AREA

5. SUSPENSE DATE

6. CONTROL NUMBER

7. DEFICIENCY |_| MAJOR |_| MINOR

FINDING:

FINDING IMPACT:

Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.

8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

9. ISSUING AUTHORITY

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE

11. COR DETERMINATION

|_| ACCEPTED |_| REJECTED

12. CLOSE DATE

4.3 Customer Complaint Form (See attachment 3)

Provides a format for customers who are support by the contractor to report on the contractor performance (For Agency use – Remember customers do not know what the contract requirements are). CORs should use this as method to become aware of issues but these forms are not to be used to evaluate the contractor unless complaint is valid and applicable to the contract (consult with Contracting Office if there are any questions).

Attachment 3: Customer Complaint Record

CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD

DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT

SOURCE OF COMPLAINT

ORGANIZATION

BUILDING NUMBER

INDIVIDUAL

PHONE NUMBER

NATURE OF COMPLAINT

CONTRACT REFERENCE

VALIDATION

DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR