Evaluations_Ratings.pdf

Evaluations & Ratings

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: price, technical, past performance

(b) To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for

Technical consideration and a rating of no less than “Satisfactory Confidence must be achieved for the

Past Performance factor. The Price factor will be evaluated to establish reasonableness of the otherwise successful quoter’s price, but will not receive an evaluation rating.

The following evaluation factors will be set forth in the solicitation.

Price

Technical

Past Performance

Technical - Quotes must provide resumes of two Registered Nurses II. Contractor employee shall be able to provide a minimum two (2) years nursing experience with one year preferred in pediatric, school, or camp nursing.

Table 1 – Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.

Proposal is unawardable.

Past Performance:

Submission with the quote of references of similar work that can be verified by the Contract Specialist prior to award. A minimum of two references are required. Any quoter unable to provide the minimum number will be determined non-responsive and eliminated from consideration.

Customer (Company) Name:

Email Address:

Type of Contract and dollar value:

General description of the project including aspects deemed relevant to this effort; (similar in scope, size and complexity of this requirements in the PWS, and whether the work was performed as a prime or subcontractor.

Table 2 - Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Table 3 - Performance Confidence Assessments

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the Quoter’s will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the Quoter’s will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Quoter’smay not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the Quoter’swill successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the Quoter’swill be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Price is not scored. Price factor will be evaluated to establish reasonableness of the otherwise successful quoter’s price, but will not receive an evaluation rating.