RFI LOG - MATOC - W912JD-10-R-0001.xls
XLS spreadsheet 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912JD11R0001
About this file
RFI LOG as of 4 Nov 10
View the file
Other files
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI
| RFI - Log - MATOC - RFP: W912JD-11-R-0001 | |||||||
| RFI No: | RFI - Question | Amendment Number | Company Name | Date Rec | Date to A&E | Date Back A&E | Response |
| 001 | advise as to what the specific requirements are to sufficiently demonstrate to the Government that a potential/interested MATOC contractor has the capability to respond to Project On-site Conferences under emergency conditions or 120 minutes? I have read sections SC4.2.1 and 4.2.1.4.1 and 4.2.1.5.1, etc. and cannot identify specific criteria listed in the aforementioned solicitation. | 001 | NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORP. | 26-Oct-10 | 26-Oct-10 | 2-Nov-10 | Please ensure that a member of the team or a local company will be available to respond to the site within 120 minutes, to begin resolving emergency situations. |
| 002 | Exhibit E-1 at B.7 – suggest the % sign be removed after 100 since the calculation multiplied by 1 will not be changed. | 001 | Nickerson & O'Day, Inc | 1-Nov-10 | contracting | 1-Nov-10 | Agree that the % sign should be removed after 100 in the formula in Exhibit E-1 line B7. B.7 should read "Percent Self-performed Work = Line B.6/Line B.5 X 100 = ____________%" |
| 003 | 00110-2.2.1 states six(6) general construction submittals for Exhibit A but Exhibit A states submission of five (5). Please clarify. | 001 | Nickerson & O'Day, Inc | 1-Nov-10 | contracting | 1-Nov-10 | Section 00110 Part 2.2.1 is the current change in effect and therefore Exhibit A Part 1 should be corrected to read "Prepare six (6) Part 1 forms for general construction, and two (2) for design build, if requesting consideration for this option. " |
| 004 | Could you please verify that the work to be done to the data rack in Room 105 is just a removal and reinstall and that there are no new or additional components that will need to be installed? | 001 | Richardson Electrical | 2-Nov-10 | 2-Nov-10 | 3-Nov-10 | Affirmative, remove and reinstall existing components; coordinate with the contracting officer before removing; components damaged by Contractor will be replaced at no additional cost to the Government. |
| 005 | Request a time extension of one week from Nov. 30, 2010 for the submission of the RFP. Thanksgiving week vacations will have a significant impact on obtaining all the information that is required and we will only have one working day after Thanksgiving for the complete compilation of required documentation. | Nickerson & O'Day, Inc | 3-Nov-10 | contracting | |||
| 006 | There is fiber optic cable being used on this project between the data jacks and the data rack. The specification is not clear as to the exact type of fiber required. Could this clarify? | 001 | Richardson Electrical | 3-Nov-10 | 4-Nov-10 | Do not install fiber optic cable at this time; this will be installed as part of a future contract. | |
| 007 | Proposal Inquiry: Is there to be a sprinkler system installed on this project? There were no fire protection drawings or specifications on the website. Please clarify. | Davis Ulmer, Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company | 4-Nov-10 | 4-Nov-10 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .