PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HI CST FY24 Culminating Training Exercise (CTE) and Task Proficiency Exercise (TPE) Support
- Solicitation number
- W912J624R0008
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for non-personal services to support the 93rd Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN) Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team (CST) in Hawaii. The questionnaire requests past performance information from a reference, including the type of service provided, location, contract amount, staffing, and assessment of the contractor's quality of service and customer relations. The evaluation criteria are specified, and the reference is asked to rate the contractor's performance as Excellent, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory, with narratives required for any rating other than Satisfactory.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the HI CST FY24 Culminating Training Exercise (CTE) and Task Proficiency Exercise (TPE) Support, with the objective of assisting and executing up to two table-top exercises and two field training exercises in August and September 2024 to develop, exercise, and assess the 93rd CST's core competencies in CBRN/HAZMAT response. The period of performance is 2 months from August 1 to September 30, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912J624R0008 SOLICITATION.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The United States Property & Fiscal Office (USPFO) for Hawaii Contracting Office is conducting a competitive acquisition for non-personal services requirement of County Exercises in support of the Combat Support Team, Hawaii Army National Guard.
The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance, and return to clesson.k.paet.civ@army.mil and anthony.g.reyes1.civ@army.mil by 2 July 2024, 10:00 AM (Hawaii Standard Time).
Note: Clearly identify and provide the name of the Prime Contractor and Subcontractor.
Specify Prime Contractor/Subcontractor.
Name of Contractor being evaluated: ______________________________________________
Contract/Order Number: _
1. Type of service being provided?
2. Where is the location of this service?
3. What is the contract amount?
4. How many Full Time Equivalents (FTE) are on the contract?
5. Have there been any unsatisfactory performance resulting in additional contractual or administrative costs?
☐ Yes ☐ No
If “Yes,” explain: _____________________________________________________________________
The last two questions will discuss quality of service & customer relations. Please refer to the following:
Rating System:
(1) Excellent – Overall performance exceeds contractual requirements and gives extra benefits to the customer. Problems, if any, were promptly corrected without negative impact to the customer.
(2) Satisfactory – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory
(3) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractor’s proposed actions to correct any problems appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(4) Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
IMPORTANT NOTE: NARRATIVES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ANY RATING OTHER THAN SATISFACTORY AND MUST SUPPORT THE RATING GIVEN.
6. Quality of Service – Please rate overall compliance with the contract Performance Work Statement.
☐ Excellent ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsatisfactory If other than “Satisfactory,” a narrative must be provided to explain how the overall performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
7. Business/Customer Relations – Please rate overall effective management; successfully managed services; reasonable/cooperative behavior; flexibility; business-like concern for customer’s interest.
☐ Excellent ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐ Unsatisfactory
If other than “Satisfactory,” a narrative must be provided to explain how the overall performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| Signature: ____________________________________ | Date: ____________________ |
| Print Name: ___________________________________ | Agency/Unit: ___________________________________ |
| Title/Position: _________________________________ | Telephone: ____________________________ |
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .