Amend-0001-W912HY19R0011.pdf

W45VAK91152529

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Continued on Page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 1

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HY19R0011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Aug-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) for rapid response hopper dredging due to unanticipated shoaling and shore protection projects in multiple locations within the boundaries of the Galveston District is hereby amended as follows:

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

2000 FORT POINT ROAD

P.O. BOX 1229

GALVESTON TX 77553-1229

W912HY 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

8/29/19

W9126HY19R0011

A0001-2

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. The specifications for Request for Proposal No. W9126HY19R0011, Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) for Rapid Response Hopper Dredging for Unanticipated Shoaling for Six (6) Deep Draft Navigation Channels Within the Galveston District, Texas ), are hereby amended as follows:

a) Specifications.

(1) SECTION 00 22 11, PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION

CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD – The enclosed SECTION 00 22 11entitled

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIA

OF AWARD supersedes that issued with this Request for Proposal.

2. This amendment shall be attached to and become a part of the Request for Proposal.

1 Encls:

1. SECTION 00 22 11, PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA

AND BASIS OF AWARD

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 1

(TO ACCOMPANY AMENDMENT NO. 0001 TO RFP W912HY19R0011)

SECTION 00 22 11

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

AMENDMENT NO. 0001

PART I – GENERAL INFORMATION

A. OVERVIEW

This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits offers for a Multiple Award

Task Order Contract (MATOC) for hopper dredging due to unanticipated shoaling from a tropical storm, flood, hurricane event or other event which results in unanticipated shoaling resulting in identifiable “Draft Restricting” shoals that impede navigation and must be cleared expeditiously. The work under this contract will be accomplished by hopper dredge for the six (6) Deep Draft Channels within the Galveston District boundary.

B. BASIS FOR AWARD

The award will be made using a Best Value source selection process authorized by Class Deviation No. 2018-O0006, Evaluation Factors for Certain Multiple-Award Task or Delivery Order Contract to identify the best overall proposals that are determined to be the most beneficial to the Government.

Evaluation methodology for the instant procurement consists of four (4) factors: Specialized Experience, Plant and Equipment, Organization and Past Performance. The failure of a proposal to meet all of the requirements under any one of the evaluated areas, will render the proposal as technically unacceptable overall, and the offer will be removed from further consideration for award. Price proposals will be evaluated per Task Order. The Government will evaluate these performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein.

The Contracting Officer intends to award a minimum of two (2) Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts to every Offeror that submits an Acceptable proposal. The maximum number of contract awards will be dependent upon the number of Offerors whose proposals the Source Selection Authority determines to meet the requirements of acceptability as set forth herein. Awards of the MATOCs will be made on the basis of proposals meeting the acceptability standards.

The Government intends to make award without holding discussions with Offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Source Selection Authority or the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary. Therefore, Offerors are encouraged to include their best performance and technical capability requirements.

C. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND FORMAT

Offerors shall organize their proposal as described in this solicitation. Proposals may be determined to be non-responsive for failure to follow the prescribed format. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly evaluate factors identified within this solicitation. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross referencing are necessary. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror’s evaluation. Offerors shall provide sufficient detail and clearly define all

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 2 items required in this Section.

Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents (Cover Sheets for use as the Table of Contents are provided at the end of this Section). Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices. Files shall not contain classified data.

Electronic Submission of Proposals. Offerors shall submit their proposal through electronic submission in the Federal Business Opportunities website at www.fbo.gov . Proposals shall be submitted in electronic format.

Reference Section 00 21 00, Para. 1.11 for further instructions.

Content Requirements. All information shall be confined to the appropriate volume. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal and provide adequate basis for evaluation. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details, in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal.

Narrative portions of the proposal shall be in electronic 8-1/2 x 11-inch format using no more than 7 vertical lines per inch, with page margins at least 1-inch wide. Font size shall not be less than 11pt. 11x17-inch sheets will be counted as four single-sided pages. Include a Table of Contents for each volume. The first page of each identified Tab shall begin with the number “1” with succeeding pages consecutively numbered at the bottom of each page to the end of the Tab.

Offerors who include information in their proposals which they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must mark such information in accordance with instructions contained in FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors- Competitive Acquisition, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data.”

PART II – PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS

VOLUME I – PROPOSAL/SF 1442/DATA – Volume I shall be comprised of Tabs A through F only.

TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror. Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must provide a written copy of the joint venture agreement with the proposal. The joint venture agreement must be signed by both parties and will be subject to review by Office of Counsel. Also, if the joint venture involves an 8(a) small business, approval by the Small Business Administration will also be required. The joint venture must be registered in CCR as a joint venture in order for an award to be made. In addition, the SF 1442 as well as all future documents (task orders, bonds, etc.) must be signed by both parties.

No task orders will be awarded to a joint venture unless the basic MATOC has been awarded to the joint venture. Failure to do so may result in rejection of an Offeror’s proposal.

TAB B – Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certifications

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 3

AMD#1 TAB C – Financial Statement. Submit a copy of the Offeror’s latest financial statement, including the names of banks or other financial institutions with which the Offeror conducts business. If the financial statement is more than 60 days old, a certificate should be attached stating that the financial condition is substantially the same, or if not the same, the changes that have taken place. Such statement will be treated as confidential. Determination of Responsibility, including the firm’s latest Financial Statements.

TAB D – Evidence of Bonding Capacity. A bid bond guarantee is not required, however, for evaluation of bonding capacity on future task orders submit a letter of commitment from a surety, signed by an officer or agent authorized to bond, that identifies the Offeror’s available bonding capacity and limits that the surety will bond the Offeror, as the successful awardee for this project. The surety must be acceptable to the Government and must appear on the Department of Treasury Circular 570 “Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and Acceptable Reinsuring Companies.” If the Offeror submits evidence from an individual Surety, the individual surety must include documentation meeting the requirements of FAR

28.203 and Contract Clause 52.228-11.

TAB E – Small Business Subcontracting Plan. This requirement is only applicable to Large Businesses in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Alternate II, in Section 00 72 00 of this solicitation.

TAB F – If Applicable. Joint Venture Agreement. The joint venture agreement must be signed by both parties and will be subject to review by Office of Counsel. Also, if the joint venture involves an 8(a) small business, approval by the Small Business Administration is required and must be submitted with the offeror’s proposal. Offerors are reminded that if it is an 8(a) or HUBZone joint venture, it shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively. In addition, the joint venture must be registered in CCR as a joint venture in order for an award to be made.

D. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA.

VOLUME II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – Volume II shall be comprised of Tabs G through J only.

TAB G - FACTOR 1 – Specialized Experience (Volume II, Tab G)

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Offeror shall demonstrate “recent” and “relevant” experience on hopper dredging projects completed or substantially completed within the last 5 years, using the “Specialized Experience” form that is Attachment 1 to this section. The project description shall contain enough information for the Government to clearly and easily understand how the project is relevant to this solicitation.

Offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Specialized Experience” forms in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data shall be accurate, current, and complete. Offerors are required to use the Specialized Experience Forms provided.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 4

(If applicable) If the Offeror is not self performing the major activities such as Dredging, the Offeror shall in a short narrative describe the role of any proposed subcontractors and the percentage of work they will perform. For purposes of this procurement, the firms that will perform any of the above listed major activities, if other than the prime contractor, are considered key subcontractors. Offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Specialized Experience” forms for each key subcontractor, in sufficient detail to determine how each key subcontractor’s Specialized Experience is relevant to the work they will perform.

STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY: Proposal must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” for this factor.

AMD#1 (1) *At least three (3) accurate, current and complete Specialized Experience Forms for the Offeror and/or (if applicable) for each key subcontractor must be submitted for hopper dredging projects which meet the standard of acceptability for relevant and recent as defined below:

DEFINITION OF RELEVANT: *At least three (3) of the hopper dredging projects must have been valued at $3 million or greater AND

DEFINITION OF RECENT: *At least three (3) of the hopper dredging projects must have been at least 50% complete within the last 5 years.

Table 1 – Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability/Unacceptability Rating Method Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

TAB H - Factor 2 – PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

FACTOR 2: PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Volume II, Tab H):

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

The Offeror shall provide documentation for all major pieces of equipment being proposed for use under this solicitation/contract, and any subsequent task orders, and which will be utilized to dredge, transport, process, haul and dispose of dredge material. Provide verification of the Hopper Dredge(s) Coast Guard certification. Offerors are instructed to use the “Equipment Documentation” form Attachment 2 provided at the end of this Section which lists the necessary documentation for all dredges being proposed for use under this solicitation, and any subsequent task orders. Offerors are cautioned to include all of their dredges as well as other major plant equipment, support vessels, trawlers, etc. in responding to this evaluation factor. AMD#1 ABS Certification for any barges if used offshore and documentation showing Ownership and/or Lease Agreement for Dredge if applicable.

STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY:

This standard is met when the following has been shown, when the Offeror:

1. Demonstrates the Offeror owns or have access to a dredge(s) and other

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 5 major plant, equipment, support vessels, etc. necessary to perform the work required by this solicitation. The dredges must be a Coast Guard Certified.

Table 2 – Factor 2 – Technical Acceptability/Unacceptability Rating Method

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

TAB I - FACTOR 3 – Organization, (Volume II, Tab I)

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

The Offeror shall provide an organizational chart indicating the On-Site Construction Personnel for a hopper dredging project to include, job description. The organizational chart shall indicate lines of responsibility.

Key On-Site Construction Personnel needed for a Task Order are as follows:

1. Site Superintendent

2. Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO)

3. Contractor Quality Control (CQC) Manager NOTE: Per Section 01 35

26.01 45, the CQC cannot be the SSHO.

STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABILITY:

AMD#1

This standard is met when the following has been shown, when the Offeror:

Offeror demonstrates that the Offeror has the qualified Site Personnel necessary to manage a dredging task order, assure a safe working environment and quality on-time completion of a hopper dredging task order.

1. Demonstrates a technically acceptable approach to meeting the specification requirements and an understanding of the work required of the RFP.

2. Demonstrates that the Offeror has the Site Personnel necessary to assure quality on-time completion of the work required under the Request for Proposal.

Table 3 – Factor 3 – Technical Acceptability/Unacceptability Rating Method

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

TAB J - Factor 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 4: PAST PERFORMANCE, (Volume II, Tab J)

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 6

(a) Past Performance Information (PPI) is to be provided for ALL the projects listed on the Offeror and Key Subcontractor “Specialized Experience” forms submitted in Factor 1.

• Department of Defense (DoD) projects: Offerors shall not request PPQs on projects that have final CPARS evaluations. If a PPQ is received on a project where a final CPARS evaluation exists, the CPARS evaluation will serve as the official rating of record for evaluation purposes.

• Non DoD projects or projects that do not have a CPARS evaluation: The Offeror shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to the points of contact (POC) responsible for monitoring performance under those contracts Attachment 3 of this solicitation). Completed PPQs shall be forwarded directly to Contract Specialist: Lucille.r.smith@usace.army.mil .

NOTE: If PPQs will be submitted directly to the contract specialist it is recommended that Offerors include a list of the POC’s contact information.

This information will be used to ensure that the PPQs are placed with your proposal. However, it is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure the PPQs have been received by the Contract Specialist by the proposal due date.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and any other known sources whether identified by the proposal or not.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing required, detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

The Government may contact references provided as part of the Factor for Specialized Experience, for information regarding past performance on the project and for assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed.

Offerors shall provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABILITY:

This standard is met when the following has been shown, when the Offeror:

1. Illustrates customer “SATISFACTORY” or better evaluation for completion of at least three relevant hopper dredging projects within the last five years;

2. Does not have any “MARGINAL” or “UNSATISFACTORY” overall performance ratings on any dredging project performed for the federal government within the last five years.

Contractors will be queried through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) to validate past performance ratings.

mailto:Lucille.r.smith@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 7

NOTE: Offerors without relevant information on past performance or for whom information on past performance is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offer may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of Acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “Acceptable.”

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 8

Table 4 – Factor 4 – Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note above)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Any rating an Offeror has in PPIRS/CPARS will count toward this requirement. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the Contracting Officer has received a minimum of three (3) questionnaires (attached) by the Closing Date or that have a minimum of three (3) current ratings in PPIRS/CPARS. New entities that have no past customers shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing, prior to the date and time established for the RFP closing, that they have had no previous clients and that the minimum number of questionnaires cannot be provided. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

The Government may contact references provided as part of this factor, for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed.

Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) members will review the past performance information available, to include FAPIIS, PPIRS, CPARS and other past performance information deemed relevant, to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment.

Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and/or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, correcting construction errors, etc. If the Government cannot establish the Offeror’s relevant past performance, it reserves the right to contact the points of contact on the information sheets. The Government will not release the information gathered to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 9

COMPLETE THIS FORM AND INCLUDE IT AS PART OF YOUR PROPOSAL

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SOLICITATION NO. W912HY19R0011

OFFEROR’S COMPANY NAME:

COVER SHEET

VOLUME I

(Include this Cover Sheet in the front of each Volume I binder submitted)

This Volume contains the following documents:

(Offeror check applicable items)

________ TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror.

________ TAB B – Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certifications

________ TAB C – Determination of Responsibility, including latest financial statements.

________ TAB D – Evidence of Bonding Capability

________ TAB E – Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable)

________ TAB F – Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 10

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SOLICITATION NO. W912HY19R0011

OFFEROR’S COMPANY NAME:

COVER SHEET

VOLUME II

(Include this Cover Sheet in the front of each Volume II binder submitted)

This Volume contains the following documents:

(Offeror check applicable items)

TAB G – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE.

_______TAB H – FACTOR 2 - PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Use the Equipment Documentation form provided on the following page).

TAB I – FACTOR 3 – Organization

TAB J – Factor 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 11

ATTACHMENT 1 VOLUME II – TAB G FACTOR 1

SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

RFP No. W912HY19R0011

Provide the following information to show examples of hopper dredging projects your company performed within the last five years indicating specialized experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

a. Type of Work Represented

b. Your Firm’s Name

c. Name of Project

d. Location of Project

e. Owner

f. General Scope of Construction Project

g. Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self-Performed

h. Construction Cost

i. Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out

j. Dates Construction Began Ended

k. Your Performance Evaluation, if known

l. Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages?

m. Owner’s Point of contact (POC) for reference (Name and Company)

n. Current Telephone number of POC for reference _____________________________________

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 12

ATTACHMENT 2

AMD#1

PLANT AND EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION

(Submit this sheet in Factor 2, Volume II – Tab H)

FOR ALL DREDGES, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION

(Submit a Separate Sheet for Each Dredge or Major Support Equipment)

1. Identification/Name of Dredge:

AMD#1 Include the following documents under the appropriate tab as applicable:

___ Coast Guard Certification, (Volume II, Tab H)

___ ABS Certification for any barges if used offshore (Volume II, Tab H)

___ Document showing Ownership and/or Lease Agreement for Dredge (Volume II, Tab K)

2. Associated booster-pump/hopper equipment (including size):

3. Age and Condition (including information of last major maintenance and scheduled future maintenance):

4. Dimensions of Dredge including draft and freeboard:

5. Positioning Equipment (vessel and dredge-head/arm apparatus):

6. Size of Suction and Discharge Lines:

7. Primary Pump Horsepower:

8. Total Horsepower of Dredge:

9. Maximum/minimum Dredging Depths:

10. D r e d g e Types and Sizes (if applicable):

11. Historical Production Rate (daily maximum rate under normal operating conditions for the following types of material):

Silt:

Sand:

AMD#1 12. Other - Support vessels, trawlers, etc

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 13

COMPLETE PART 1 OF THIS FORM AND INCLUDE IT AS PART OF YOUR PROPOSAL

ATTACHMENT 3 VOLUME II – TAB J FACTOR 4

CONSTRUCTION PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PART 1 (To be completed by the offeror and submitted with the proposal under TAB J.)

1. Contractor/Name & Address (City and State)

2. Type of Contract Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement

Other (Specify)

3. Title of Project/Contract Number

4. Description of Work

5. Location of Work

6. Date of Award

7. Status Active (Please provide percent complete)

Complete (Please provide completion date)

8. Name and telephone number of Owner’s Technical Representative

Name Phone

PART II – (To be completed by client and emailed to directly to the USACE Contract Specialist at:

lucille.r.smith@usace.army.mil and the Contracting Officer at maria.e.rodriguez@usace.army.mil

QUALITY OF PRODUCT/SERVICE:

9. Please evaluate the contractor's performance in complying with contract requirements, quality achieved and overall technical expertise demonstrated.

Excellent Quality

Above Average Quality

Average Quality

Below Average Quality

Unsuccessful or Experienced Significant Quality Problems

Remarks:

mailto:lucille.r.smith@usace.army.mil mailto:maria.e.rodriguez@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 14

10. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate, complete and submitted in a timely manner?

Excellent Quality

Above Average Quality

Average Quality

Below Average Quality

Unsuccessful or Experienced Significant Quality Problems

Remarks:

11. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Owner counterparts?

Excellent

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Unsuccessful

12. How well did the contractor manage and coordinate subcontractors, suppliers, and the labor force?

Excellent

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Unsuccessful

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

13. To what extent were the end users satisfied with:

Quality?

Cost?

Schedule?

Exceptionally Satisfied

Highly Satisfied

Satisfied

Somewhat Dissatisfied

Highly Dissatisfied

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

14. To what extent did the contractor meet the required schedules?

Completed Substantially Ahead of Schedule

Completed on Schedule with no Time Delays Completed on Schedule with Minor Delays Under Extenuating Circumstances

Experienced Significant Delays without Justification

15. If given the opportunity, would you work with this contractor again?

Yes _____________ No ___________ Not Sure ______________

OTHER REMARKS:

16. Please use the space below to provide other information related to the contractor's performance.

This may include the contractor's selection and management of subcontractors, flexibility in dealing with contract challenges, their overall concern for the Owner’s interest, project awards received, etc.