FY20_SERDP_Supplemental_Instructions_-_BAA_-_FINAL.docx

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (SERDP)

FY 2020 SUPPLEMENTAL SOLICITATION

SERDP Broad Agency Announcement Proposal Instructions

Reference: Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), August 1, 2019 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity

INTRODUCTION

The Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) is the Department of Defense's (DoD) environmental research and development program, planned and executed in partnership with the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency. SERDP's role is to fund research and development that addresses environmental issues relevant to the management and mission of DoD. SERDP-supported efforts lead to the development and application of innovative environmental technologies or methods that improve the environmental performance of DoD by improving outcomes, managing environmental risks, and/or reducing costs or time required to resolve environmental problems. The development and application of innovative environmental science and technology support the long term sustainability of DoD’s installations and ranges, and significantly reduce current and future environmental liabilities. Within its broad areas of interest, the Program focuses on Environmental Restoration, Munitions Response, Resource Conservation and Resiliency, and Weapons Systems and Platforms. SERDP funds research and development programs in basic and applied research and advanced technology development.

General Information for Proposers

SERDP is seeking proposals focusing on the development of non-fluorine based firefighting foams for projects to be funded in fiscal year (FY) 2020. The specific Statement of Need (SON) may be found on the SERDP website.

This Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) is for Private Sector Organizations. DoD organizations or other Federal agencies should refer to the FY20 Federal Call for Proposals located on the SERDP website.

Awardees under this BAA will be selected through a multi-stage review process including a full proposal and an oral presentation to the SERDP Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) for final approval. To be eligible for consideration, proposers must submit a proposal. Any proposal submitted shall be in response to only the SERDP SON set forth in this announcement.

Based on an evaluation of the written full proposal, and pending approval by the SAB, SERDP will notify each proposer as to whether the Government Contracting Officer wishes to enter into negotiation for the award of a contract. Proposers are advised that only the Contracting Officer is legally authorized to bind the Government. SERDP reserves the right to recommend for award any, all, or none of the proposals received. SERDP also reserves the right to recommend a portion of the work proposed in any single proposal for award. There is no commitment by SERDP to make any recommendations for contract awards, nor to be responsible for any money expended by the proposer before contract award is made. It is the sole responsibility of the proposer to make certain the proposal is properly received by SERDP. Due to the volume of proposals anticipated, SERDP will not provide debriefs on those that are not selected for funding.

The SERDP Office manages the BAA solicitation along with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity (HECSA) Contracting Center in Alexandria, Virginia. For contracting or small business information regarding this BAA solicitation, contact Doug Pohlman at 703-428-6420 or by email at Douglas.E.Pohlman@usace.army.mil or the HECSA Small Business Representative at 703-428-7385 or HECSASmallBusinessProgram@usace.army.mil respectively. General SERDP procedural questions may be referred to the SERDP office at 571-372-6565. For technical information regarding an SON, contact the individual listed in the SON.

Evaluation Schedule

September 12, 2019;

2:00 p.m. Eastern Time Proposals Due to SERDP

* Proposal packages will be sent to contracting in the second quarter of FY2020. Contract award is expected in the third quarter of 2020, but not guaranteed.

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

Proposals shall contain four sections submitted as one document: Abstract, Technical Section, Cost Section, and Appendices. Each section is described in detail below. Proposals shall be prepared in accordance with the following:

· Type size should not be less than 11 point, any font.

· All margins (top, bottom, left, and right) should not be less than 1 inch.

· Pages should be numbered beginning with the Technical Section.

· Proposals should use the headers provided in Section 2.2. These headers correspond to evaluation criteria that will be used to review, evaluate, and select proposals.

· Table of contents, introduction, executive summary, or any other elements not prescribed by this guidance are neither required nor desired.

Abstract In one page or less, provide a brief summary of the following information found in the proposal. Items 1-4 must be located at the top of the first page.

1. Proposal Number: The proposal number is generated by the SERDP and ESTCP Management System (SEMS) when the proposal details are entered.

2. Proposal Title

3. Lead Principal Investigator

4. Lead Organization

5. Objective: A brief description of the environmental issue to be addressed, emphasizing its relevancy and importance to DoD, followed by the objectives of the proposed project.

6. Technical Approach: A concise summary of the science or technology (e.g., the chemical process that will be evaluated or the science behind a new sensor that will be developed) and a brief description of the tasks and methods (e.g., modeling, laboratory experiments, field work).

7. Benefits: A brief description of the expected benefits to DoD and the scientific community. Summarize what the project will accomplish and how the results will contribute to scientific understanding and be applied by an end user to address the environmental issue relevant to DoD management.

This abstract is not part of the 10-page restriction for the Technical Section of the proposal.

Technical Section

The technical section shall be no more than 10 pages in length. A detailed description of the research to be undertaken shall be submitted using the outline below.

1. SERDP Relevance: Provide a brief statement describing explicitly how the proposed research project responds to the objectives of the Statement of Need (SON).

2. Technical Objective: State concisely the research objectives. Outline specific technical questions to be answered by the research.

3. Technical Approach (Background, Approach, and Milestones): Outline the research activities for which SERDP will provide support. Articulate specific technical goals, approach, and milestones for each year of the proposed project.

a. Background: Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the environmental issue and knowledge of the state of the science. Frame the proposed research in terms of current gaps in understanding or data. Articulate the hypotheses that the project will investigate. Cite relevant literature references.

b. Approach: Provide the technical approach and methods, preferably structured in hypothesis-driven tasks that clearly identify how the objectives of the proposed project will be addressed. This section should be the primary focus of the proposal. Provide details about the experimental design and methodology. If the methodology is new or unusual, describe it in sufficient detail for evaluation.

c. Milestones: Provide a project schedule in the form of a Gantt chart that delineates the timeline for each task as well as go/no go decision points. Ensure that all SERDP required deliverables are included in the Gantt chart. Required deliverables are found in the reporting guidelines on the SERDP website.

Cost Section The cost section of the proposal is an estimate of the total project cost. Required cost spreadsheet templates are located on the SERDP website. Cost sections in formats other than this template will not be accepted. The cost spreadsheet for the lead organization should reflect the entire project costs. Separate cost spreadsheets are required for each co-performer or subcontractor whose costs exceed $25,000 for the total project. An accompanying narrative is permitted if necessary, but not required.

If selected for funding, proposers will be required to provide a certificate of current cost or pricing data prior to award in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.403-4(a)(1) if the total contract value is expected to exceed $2,000,000.00 to the cognizant contracting office.

All SERDP projects are funded incrementally with funds provided in the year in which they are expected to be expended. The cost section should be structured to indicate annual, incremental funding required. For planning purposes, proposers should assume a project initiation date of May 1, 2020. The first year’s planned funding should run through January 31, 2021, and each subsequent year should span February 1-January 31, until anticipated project completion.

1. Labor Costs: Show the projected labor rates in units of hourly rate or annual salary to be charged by the PI(s), associates, and assistants. Indicate the units you are using in the table footnote. In the “units” column, indicate the number of hours or the fraction of annual salary to be charged. The total column is the amount per year to be paid to each performer on the project. Labor costs should be unburdened.

2. Indirect Charge #1: Indicate burden or fringe rate applied to salaries and the total cost per year. Provide an explanation in the table footnote of what is included in this indirect charge.

3. Indirect Charge #2: Indicate other relevant indirect charges such as G&A. Provide an explanation in the table footnote of what is included in this indirect charge and to which cost elements it will be applied.

4. Contractor Acquired Property: Provide an itemized list of contractor acquired property (CAP), if any, to be acquired in support of the project, showing the cost for each item. Use the second tab in the cost spreadsheet located on the SERDP website as a template. CAP is any article of non-expendable, tangible property having a useful life of more than two years and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit.

5. Materials, Supplies, and Consumables: Provide a general description and total estimated cost of expendable equipment and supplies. Include a separate itemized list using the third tab of the cost spreadsheet template located on the SERDP website.

6. Subcontracts and Government Partners: For any co-performer or subcontract totaling $25,000 or more, provide a breakout of the tasks and associated costs in a separate cost estimate using the cost spreadsheet template located on the SERDP website. Government partners will be provided a separate allocation of funds directly based upon this separate estimate. Funds provided directly from SERDP to government partners are not to be subject to contractor indirect charges or fees. The lead organization should plan to manage all subcontracts to non-government partners.

7. Travel Costs: Estimate total travel costs. List the number of trips, the destinations, purposes, and costs per trip using reasonable and allowable rates in accordance with FAR 31.205-46 for all proposed travel. Use the fourth tab in the cost spreadsheet on the SERDP website as a template for the travel budget breakdown. For trips where the specific destination has not yet been determined, budget for a representative location. For planning purposes, SERDP conducts an annual in-progress review of management and technical status of each project in the Arlington, VA area. New start projects funded to begin in 2020 will be reviewed first in February 2021, with additional annual reviews in either April/May or October/November thereafter for multi-year projects. SERDP will support attendance at one domestic technical meeting each year. SERDP intends to sponsor an annual technical Symposium in the Washington, D.C. area that investigators are expected to attend. In the event the Symposium is not held, investigators may attend an appropriate meeting of their choice at comparable cost.

8. Publication and Report Costs: Estimate the costs of publishing and reporting results, including the direct charges for clerical preparation, page or illustration charges, and distribution. The SERDP reporting requirements are located on the SERDP website. Include a separate itemized list using the fifth tab of the cost spreadsheet template located on the SERDP website.

9. Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA): Estimate the costs to comply with CMRA. The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for SERDP via a secure data collection site. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields on the ECMRA website. Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported any time during the fiscal year, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the ECMRA help desk.

10. Fixed Fee: Eligible organizations shall list the fixed fee (i.e., profit), if any, applied to the project. Indicate in the table footnote the cost elements included in the basis for the fixed fee.

11. Cost by Task Summary Table: A total cost matrix with breakout of cost per task must be included. The sixth tab in the cost spreadsheet located on the SERDP website provides a template. These numbers must match those on the main cost spreadsheet.

Appendices

Appendices are not included in the page limitation for the full proposal.

a. Required - List of Acronyms: Provide a complete list of acronyms used in your proposal and their definitions. List the proposal number at the top of the page.

b. Required, if literature is cited - Literature Citations: Provide literature citations for any material cited in the technical section or the supporting technical data.

c. Optional - Supporting Technical Data (limited to 5 pages): Data sheets, charts, and referenced research extracts.

d. Required - Abbreviated Curricula Vitae (CV) (3 pages or less per CV): CVs are required for all key technical personnel at the lead organization and the lead individual for all key co-performers or subcontractors.

e. Optional - Existing Support: If the PI is funded by other programs to conduct research that overlaps or parallels the current proposal, provide a brief description of that support (½ page per relevant effort). If applicable, provide letters of support from prospective joint sponsors. See Cooperative Development in the Technical Section.

f. Optional - Letters of Support: If you have received letters of support or commitment from installations or site managers, provide them in this section.

Submittal

Proposals are submitted via the SERDP and ESTCP Management System (SEMS). No electronic mail, faxed, or hard copy proposals will be accepted. Proposals must be submitted prior to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 12, 2019.

Complete all steps below in order to submit a proposal.

· Create a single PDF file that contains all required sections outlined in the proposal guidance.

· Log in to SEMS.

· Enter all required proposal details into SEMS. Proposal details may be saved and edited prior to final submission.

· Download or print the “Proposal Details” page. This must be signed by an individual with the authority to commit the lead organization to execute the proposed work. The document may be electronically or hand-signed. Ensure all information on the signed summary matches the proposal file.

· Upload the signed “Proposal Details” page.

· Add the system-generated proposal number, project title, lead PI name and organization to first page of proposal as instructed in Section 1.1 above.

· Upload the final proposal file.

· Submit the proposal. Only proposals that have been submitted will be considered. Proposals with a “Saved” status will not be reviewed.

Once the proposal has been submitted, SEMS will display an on-line confirmation message and will send an email notification to the proposer. It is the sole responsibility of the proposer to make certain the proposal is properly received by SERDP.

The proposer may continue to modify proposal details and upload revised proposal files until the due date. Prior versions of the proposal will be over-written and only the last version uploaded will remain in the system. Ensure the proposal details entered into the system match the contents of the PDF proposal file. It is recommended that proposals are uploaded as early as possible prior to the deadline, to ensure a successful and timely submission.

For proposal upload questions, contact the SERDP Office at 571-372-6565.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR PROPOSALS

The following evaluation factors will be the sole basis for reviewing proposals pursuant to this SON. SERDP Relevance is evaluated on a pass/fail basis. Technical Merit is significantly more important than Personnel which is more important than Cost. Transition Plan is less important than Cost.

SERDP RELEVANCE (PASS/FAIL)

Proposal reviewers will assess whether the proposal submission (1) responds to the objectives as described in the SON, and (2) falls within the SERDP mission to support basic and applied research or advanced technology development. SERDP Relevance is a threshold review and if the proposal is determined not to be relevant, no further evaluation of the proposal will be made.

TECHNICAL MERIT

The overall scientific and technical merit of the proposal must be clearly identifiable. The evaluation will consider the proposed approach and its substantiation by calculations, test data, and references. Emphasis will be placed on the proposer’s demonstration of a thorough understanding of the environmental issue. The proposer must demonstrate the ability to execute the work by providing a comprehensive, logical, orderly, and concise plan that indicates major tasks, milestones, critical paths, go/no-go decision points and key events leading to the completion of the project in the proposed time frame. In addition, the proposer must show how the technical approach and proposed tasks will address the project objectives. Strong consideration will be given to innovation; however, the degree of risk associated with individual proposals will be weighed against potential benefits. The proposal should clearly articulate how the research will advance the state of the science.

PERSONNEL

Proposal reviewers will examine and assess the applicable qualifications, capabilities, demonstrated achievements, and proposed time commitment to the project by the proposed principal(s) and other key personnel.

COST

Proposal reviewers will consider the reasonableness of the proposed cost, as well as the appropriateness and substantiation of costs for the technical complexity described. Cost sharing or leveraged resources also will be considered.

TRANSITION PLAN

The transition plan of the proposed research product(s) should demonstrate a clear understanding of how the project’s results will transition to implementation either directly through future demonstrations or through future development, and show a linkage between the work proposed and the needs of ultimate end user of the results. Coordination between the proposer and targeted end user community is of value for late-stage development projects.

Requirements for proposals Selected for Funding

Please be aware of the following requirements for proposals that are selected for funding. These requirements are considered part of the proposal process and the associated costs are to be borne by the proposer.

Revised Proposal Proposals selected for funding may require revision following the selection process and prior to contract award. Common revisions include adjustments to schedule, task structure, funding profile, or specification of required deliverables. Any missing letters of support should be provided at that time.

Briefing to the Scientific Advisory Board Proposals selected for funding require final approval from the SERDP Scientific Advisory Board (SAB). This approval generally requires the PI to present a briefing to the SAB in September or October 2019. Detailed instructions are provided to selected proposers. Note that this requirement does not apply to Limited Scope proposals.

Subcontracting Plan If your proposal is selected for funding, you will be required to submit a Subcontracting Plan if the criteria below apply to your proposal. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 19.7, all businesses, other than small business concerns, are required to submit a subcontracting plan for contract proposals that exceed $700,000. The subcontracting plan should reflect realistic, challenging, achievable positive percentage and dollar goals for subcontracting with Small Business concerns. The subcontracting plan must address a goal for each of the statutory required elements: Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Woman-Owned Small Business, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, Veteran-Owned Small Business and Historically Underutilized Business Zones. The Subcontracting plan must be reviewed, negotiated, and accepted by the Contracting Officer and Deputy of Small Business/Small Business Administration prior to contract award. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be prepared in accordance with FAR 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan. (DEVIATION 2018-O0018) and elements as described in the checklist in DFARS PGI 219.705-4 Additional information can be found on the Department of Defense Office of Small Business Programs website. The HECSA Small Business Office website provides links for small businesses. For guidance on creating an acceptable subcontracting plan or for information on locating small business concerns, contact the HECSA Small Business Representative at HECSASmallBusinessProgram@usace.army.mil or 703-428-7385.

Accounting and Auditing Requirements SERDP projects are generally awarded as cost-type contracts. To be eligible for such an award, a contractor must have an approved accounting system and an accepted up-to-date government audit. Details on these requirements can be found at the websites for Defense Contract Audit Agency and Defense Contract Management Agency. Contractors selected for award who do not meet these requirements should inform their program manager immediately, as the process for approval can be time consuming. In some cases, if the work is appropriate to a firm-fixed-price contract and requirements for a cost-type contract cannot be fulfilled, successful proposers will be given the opportunity to enter into a firm-fixed-price contract.

Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting (OCT 2016) as prescribed in DFARS 204.7304(c) is a mandatory clause that will be included in all SERDP contracts. DFARS 204.7304(c) reads:

“(c) Use the clause at 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial items, except for solicitations and contracts solely for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items.”

Most SERDP projects do not result in defense covered information. A written determination will be made by the SERDP office at final project acceptance for those that do. However, any resultant contract will not include addendums or local text regarding this mandatory clause.

publication of fundamental research

Work funded under a BAA may include basic research, applied research, and advanced technology development (ATD). SERDP is considered Fundamental Research as defined in the USD (AT&L) memorandum on Fundamental Research, dated May 24, 2010. "Fundamental research" means basic and applied research in science and engineering, the result of which ordinarily are published and shared broadly within the scientific community.

In conformance with the USD (AT&L) guidance and National Security Decision Directive 189, SERDP will place no restriction on the conduct or reporting of unclassified fundamental research, except as otherwise required by statute, regulation, or Executive Order. On some sensitive topics, ATD may require restrictions during the conduct of the research and DoD prepublication review of research results due to subject matter sensitivity.