amd7.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

A. CONTRACT CHANGES: None B. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES: The revised Section listed below (revised by Amendment No. 0007) is hereby added to and made a part of the solicitation. Revised or added information is underlined and deleted information is struck out. Revisions can be located in the appropriate volume of specifications by searching for an asterisk and amendment number (i.e., *1).

Revised Section 01 11 00 C. CONTRACT DRAWINGS: There are no draw ing changes w ith this amendment.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 33

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Feb-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HN-15-R-0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Feb-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Feb-2017

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SAVANNAH

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVE

SAVANNAH GA 31401-3640

W912HN 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912HN-15-R-0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

The following have been modified:

REVISED PRICING SCHEDULE

Attachment 1

REVISED Task Order Pricing Schedule

W912HN-15-R-0006

Fort Bragg MATOC Phase II Renovate Bldg. D-2450 PN: FA-19201-4P

Total Base CLINS $_________________________

CLIN No. Description of Item Qty U/M Unit $ Amount

0001 BASE - Design of Bldg. D-2450 (TEMF) 1 Job $______ $__________ Renovation

0002 BASE – Replacement of 12’x8’ Windows 4 Each $______ $_________

0003 BASE – Replacement of 8’x8’ Windows 4 Each $______ $_________

0004 BASE – Replacement of 5’x8’ Windows 6 Each $______ $_________

0005 BASE – Replacement of 4’x4’ Windows 12 Each $______ $_________

0006 BASE – Replacement of Rolling Coiling Doors with New 12’x 12’ Electric Rolling Coiling Doors 32 Each $______ $_________

0007 BASE – Replacement of 2’8”x7’ Doors 20 Each $______ $_________

0008 BASE – Replacement of 3’x7’ Doors 8 Each $______ $_________

0009 BASE – Replacement of 6’x7’ Doors 2 Each $______ $_________

0010 BASE – Repair Damaged Brick and Exterior Wall Penetrations 300 SF $______ $_________

0011 BASE – Paint Exterior Walls of the Building Including Gutters and Downspouts 19,500 SF $______ $_________

0012 BASE – Paint Interior Walls of the

Maintenance Bays 15,000 SF $______ $_________

0013 BASE – Renovation of Bldg. D-2450 (TEMF) Inclusive of all work required to complete the Summary of Work (01 11 00) except for Those items specifically identified in CLINS 0002 through 0012 above. 1 Job $_______ $________

0014 BASE - Contractor Manpower Reporting 1 Job $_______ $________

Notes for Task Order Pricing Schedule:

Note 1: Contract Duration, in Calendar Days, after receipt of the Notice to Proceed for the Base CLINs 0001 and 0014 is 420 Calendar Days.

Note 2: Offerors shall insert a price on all CLINS of the Task Order Pricing Schedule (Attachment 1) with the exception of CLIN 0002. For CLIN 0002 Offerors may insert a price, or indicate “not separately priced” (NSP).

Note 3: To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Task Order Pricing Schedule as indicated in the RFP or the latest revision thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors shall state their revised prices for each CLIN.

Note 4: Offers providing less than 180 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

Note 5: Contractor Manpower Reporting (CMR) is a one-time charge and there should be no direct charge for recurring reporting. The Contractor is referred to the CMR website for further instructions: https://cmra/army/mil. This may be a charge covered in overhead and therefore not separately priced, in which case you may enter “NSP” at CLIN 0014.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

AMENDMENT 5

SECTION 00 21 00

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

FOR PHASE II

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) under which task orders for General Construction are expected to be issued with work primarily at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; however, work may also be performed at other Federal Facilities located within the geographic boundaries of the US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,) Work may also be performed at other Federal Facilities outside the above-stated geographical boundary on an excepted basis as determined by the Contracting Officer. Task Orders issued under any resultant contract(s) will be Firm-Fixed Price and may be either of a Construction or Design/Build Construction nature. A project requiring use of civil funds is not authorized under this contract. (See solicitation section 01 00 00 for the complete scope of the anticipated contract to be awarded under this RFP.)

1.2 The purpose of the Source Selection plan is to establish a uniform evaluation procedure for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) using the Trade-Off Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-1). In as much as the proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform any resulting contract, and task orders issued there under, the proposal should be specific and complete in every detail as well as be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract and task orders issued thereafter.

1.3 For the purposes of this solicitation amendment, the Government will implement Phase II of Design Build Process. The Government has completed the evaluation of all of the offerors performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described for Phase I. The Government has selected eight (8) of the most highly qualified Offerors to participate in Phase II.

1.4 This is Phase II of the solicitation process and the Government will evaluate both technical capability and price.

1.5 Only those Offerors who have received written notification from the Savannah District Contracting Officer that their firm has been selected to participate in Phase II of this solicitation will be permitted to a proposal. The technical requirements package for the Seed Task Order, Project Number FA-19201-14 is attached to this solicitation.

2. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT:

2.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

2.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one binder is used, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

2.3 Electronic Matter Submissions. In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format. Offerors may use compressions utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission. Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 14 of Standard Form 30 or listed elsewhere in the solicitation.

Title the file(s) in the following format:

W912HN-15-R-0006_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME I

W912HN-15-R-0006_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME II

Submit the Price and Technical proposals electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website at: https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE/welcome.aspx. At the AMRDEC SAFE website, select the link: I do not have a CAC or this machine is not configured to read my CAC and I would like to access SAFE as a Guest User, to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). [Note: It has been reported that documents are more quickly uploaded into the AMRDEC SAFE website when using a Firefox web browser. The Government cannot verify that this is true and offers no guarantee that offerors will have more success utilizing any particular browser.]

When your proposal is submitted via the AMRDEC SAFE website, the website will provide notification of the submittal to the Government recipients. When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, you will be required to enter email addresses for the recipients. For this solicitation, the recipients will be the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist. The Contract Specialist for this project is Mrs. Mea Floyd, whose email address is meawonna.Floyd@usace.army.mil. The Contracting Officer for this project is Mr. Chad Arnett, whose email address is chad.a.arnett@usace.army.mil. These email addresses are the ones you will enter as recipients.

In addition, after uploading your documents, you will be required to verify your email address before AMRDEC will send notification to the Government recipients. This is a very important step – even if you successfully upload your proposal to AMRDEC SAFE, notification will not be sent to the Government until you verify your email address, which may result in the rejection of your proposal for lateness. Follow the instructions on the AMRDEC website and confirmation emails you receive from AMRDEC.

Proposal Due Date and Time:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN-15-R-0006 Due Date of Proposal: 21 February 2017 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 P.M. (Eastern time) Title of Project: Fort Bragg MATOC

The date and time of delivery will be established by the time of receipt of the email notification to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer by the AMRDEC SAFE website, not by the date and time of uploading of the proposal into the AMRDEC SAFE website. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous – in fact, it can take several minutes or even hours in some cases. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal. If an electronic submission is uploaded minutes before the deadline but notification is not actually received in the recipients’ email inboxes until after the deadline, the submission will be considered late.

The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient of proposals. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

2.4 Proposal Formatting. Proposals shall be on 8 ½ x 11 size pages in no less than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum. Pages in excess of any specified limitation shall not be evaluated.

TECHNICAL MATTERS: Submit technical inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at (https://www.projnet.org) at least 10 calendar days prior to the date established in the RFP for receipt of proposals.

The Government reserves the right to decline addressing questions received less than 10 calendar days prior to receipt of proposals.

If an Offeror believes that the requirements in this Request for Proposal contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound; immediately notify the Contract Specialist in writing with supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to award this Request for Proposal based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

To submit and review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access.

A prospective vendor who submits a comment or question will receive an acknowledgement via e-mail, followed by an answer after it has been processed by our technical team. All timely questions and approved answers will be made available through ProjNet. Approved answers to all timely questions will also be posted on the FedBizOps in the form of a report generated from ProjNet as soon as the comment/question entering period is over and answers are all finalized.

W912HN-15-R-0006

Fort Bragg General Construction MATOC Bidder Inquiry Key: NS6VIA-8FPMPD

Specific Instructions for Initial ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. E-mail. Enter the e-mail address you would like to use for communication.

5. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, E-mail, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

Steps 1 through 3: same as above.

4. E-mail. Enter the e-mail address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

5. Click Continue. A page will then open asking for the answer to your Secret Question.

6. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed, you are logged into the system.

3. PHASE II – PROPOSAL EVALUATION.

3.1. The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, proposal corrections and any information obtained from other sources, e.g.

past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

3.2. Each member of the SSEB will independently consider all information provided in the proposal. Once these individual analyses are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor. It is the responsibility of each member of the SSEB to provide and document sufficient strengths, weaknesses, and/or deficiencies to support the assigned rating for each factor. Comments are required for all ratings.

3.3. The final ratings on individual factors, to include all support documentation, will be provided to the Source Selection Authority. The Source Selection Authority, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will determine which Offeror, if any, will receive the contract award.

4. EXCEPTIONS. Exceptions to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation (e.g., standard company terms and conditions) may result in a determination to reject a proposal.

5. RESTRICTIONS. Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

6. PHASE II – PROPOSAL TABBING REQUIREMENTS. Phase II proposals shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

PHASE II – VOLUME I – CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND PRICE PROPOSAL

TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror. Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture.

TAB B – Proposal Pricing Schedule, Section 00 010—Schedule A (including Sample Task Order Pricing)

TAB C – Bid Bond – In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, Offerors are required to submit an original bid bond, for Phase II only, in accordance with these instructions and by the time and date established for the receipt of proposals. The Bid Guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $3 Million, whichever is less. Bid bonds must be submitted in original form and contain original signatures. Photocopied, facsimile, scanned or otherwise mechanically reproduced bid bonds will not be accepted. Failure to submit a proper bid bond shall be cause for rejection of an Offeror's proposal.

ELECTRONIC BID BOND SUBMISSION, TO INCLUDE E-MAIL AND FACSIMILE

TRANSMISSIONS IS NOT AUTHORIZED.

HANDCARRIED BID BOND SUBMISSIONS, except for delivery by Federal Express and United Parcel Service, IS NOT AUTHORIZED.

Bid Bonds must be delivered by U.S. Mail, including U.S. Express Mail, Federal Express or United Parcel Service. All Bid Bonds must be clearly identified with the contractor's name and address. To ensure timely and proper handling, the lower left corner of the outermost wrapper should indicate the following:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN-15-R-0006 Due Date of Proposal: 21 February 2017 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 P.M. (Eastern time) Title of Project: General Construction MATOC, Fort Bragg NC

Bid Bonds must be addressed:

U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah ATTN: CECT-SAS-E (Mea Floyd) 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31401-3640

The date and time of delivery established by commercial carriers is not the official time of receipt by the Government. Security Guards posted at the loading dock entry for the building do not receive bid bonds and will contact Mailroom personnel. Once Mailroom personnel are available, the bid bonds will be processed by the Security Guards using established security procedures and subsequently picked up by Mailroom personnel.

After receipt by the Mailroom personnel, a record will be made of the receipt of the bid bonds. Completion of these actions will constitute delivery of the bid bonds by the date and time designated for receipt of the bid bonds.

Offerors that use U.S. Mail or U.S. Express Mail must allow sufficient time for the bid bonds to be received by Mailroom personnel by the time specified. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the bid bonds to be processed for receipt and are cautioned that sufficient time may be as much as 24 hours prior to the date and time designated. The Government will not be responsible for bid bonds delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that bid bonds are submitted so as to reach the office designated for receipt. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the bid bonds to be physically received and processed by Mailroom personnel in accordance with the information provided.

PHASE II – VOLUME II – TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

TAB D – FACTOR 3 – Design Technical - Building Function and Aesthetics

TAB E – FACTOR 4 – Design Technical Approach - Quality of Building Systems

7. PHASE II–TAB D — FACTOR 3 – DESIGN TECHNICAL - BUILDING FUNCTION

AND AESTHETICS

7.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

7.1.1. Presentation Drawings

a. Presentation exterior elevations of each facility clearly noting proposed materials and colors.

b. Presentation interior of the facility clearly noting proposed materials and colors.

c. A color board including primary interior and exterior finish materials.

7.1.2. Technical Approach Narratives.

a. Provide technical approach narratives, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. Preface the narratives with a design concepts narrative, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal.

Whether individual narratives or a single combined narrative is provided, the maximum total length for narratives under this -TECHNICAL SECTION shall not exceed eight (8) pages. b. Architectural Theme and Materials. This narrative shall not exceed two (2) pages. Describe the architectural themes of the various facilities and spaces which demonstrate how the proposal achieves the results desired by the Statement of Work. Narrative should address how the selection of materials and colors enhances the exterior and interior aesthetics of the facilities and improves the living and/or working conditions for the soldier populations who will utilize the facilities. This narrative is not intended to be a material listing, but to explain/reflect how the selections were made and how they address the requirements.

7.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

7.2.1. FACTOR 3 – DESIGN TECHNICAL - BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS:

The following elements will be evaluated:

7.2.1.1. Do the facilities provide acceptable life safety and fire safety measures?

7.2.1.2. Building Aesthetics: This element considers the overall “appeal” of the facility and the desire that both the interior and exterior of the facilities present a professional, attractive appearance. The following will be considered under this component:

a. Exterior Considerations:

1) Proposals shall be evaluated on design of facades, roof lines, and delineation of entrances, proportions of fenestration in relation to elevations, shade and shadow effects, materials, textures, exterior color schemes.

2) Is the building complimentary of the adjacent structures? Is the building an attractive addition to the installation? How well does the building harmonize with its environment, including surrounding facilities?

b. Interior Considerations:

1) Are the proposed colors and material finishes conducive to the working environment of the facility?

2) For administrative areas, does the interior design provided establish a positive working environment?

3) Has the proposal addressed/provided for natural and artificial light in the living and working spaces and is the arrangement of fenestration and lighting fixtures in the spaces conducive to furniture placement and space usage?

4) Do the proposed ceiling material, elevation, and design enhance the environment?

5) Has “support item” placement been considered and addressed in the proposal to enhance the environment? For example: placement of supply/exhaust devices, placement of electrical panels, and placement of exhaust fans, etc.

6) Does the proposals provide for acoustic control of noise from service/support spaces to administrative areas?

7.2.2. Design Technical - Building Function and Aesthetics. Will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions.

7.2.2.1. OUTSTANDING - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

7.2.2.2. GOOD - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

7.2.2.3. ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

7.2.2.4. MARGINAL - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

7.2.2.5. UNACCEPTABLE - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

7. PHASE II – TAB E – FACTOR 4 – DESIGN TECHNICAL APPROACH - QUALITY

OF BUILDING SYSTEMS

8.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Presentation Drawings. There are no specific drawings requirements for this TECHNICAL SECTION. However, the Offeror has the option of providing concept level drawing information for specific materials and/or systems which the Offeror feels are necessary to describe the proposed systems or materials.

b. Technical Approach Narratives. Provide technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. It is acceptable to include all the elements below into a single combined narrative for the entire facility. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed. Whether individual narratives or a single combined narrative is provided, the maximum total length for narratives under this-TECHNICAL SECTION shall not exceed eight (8) typewritten pages:

c. Architectural Finishes: Describe how the materials selected provide for a suitable environment for the expected population of the facility. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on aesthetics, durability and maintenance of the finishes proposed.

d. Mechanical Systems: Describe how the mechanical systems selected provide for a highly efficient environmental control system including information about provisions for indoor air quality maintenance. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

e. Plumbing Systems: Describe how the plumbing systems selected provide for a highly efficient domestic hot water system and an efficient piping system.

Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

f. Electrical Systems: Describe how the electrical power and lighting systems, telephone, data, and cable television systems selected provide for a highly efficient electrical system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

g. Site Utilities and Site Systems: Describe how the site utility systems selected provide for an efficient piping system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements.

Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage. Include information regarding coordination with privatized utility providers where applicable.

h. Interoperability: Describe how systems integrated into the new facilities which require connection and interface with existing installation wide systems will be accommodated in the proposed project. Narrative should address the following systems as minimum: Fire Alarm, Telephone, Cable Television, UMCS, and privatized utility companies where applicable.

i. Energy Conservation: Describe the strategy to achieve required energy savings as specified in the RFP.

j. ATFP Considerations: Describe how the proposed materials, systems, and designs address the mandatory building ATFP requirements included in the Statement of Work.

k. Proposed Material Identifications: In order to evaluate and rate the quality of the materials being proposed, including any material or equipment warranties exceeding the one year warranty in the contract clause “Warranty of Construction”, the Offeror shall include in the proposal material identification for major materials in each of the areas shown below:

1) Architectural Finishes

2) Interior Walls

3) Floors

4) Ceilings

5) Exterior Walls

6) Window systems/types (not individual windows)

7) Roofing Systems

8) Mechanical Systems

9) Central Heating/Cooling Equipment

10) Pumps

11) Air Handling Equipment

12) HVAC System Control Equipment

13) Energy Conservation Features

14) Plumbing Systems

15) Domestic Hot Water Generator

16) Electrical Systems

17) Main Switchgear and Panels

18) Data, Telephone, Cable TV, Intercom, CCTV, or Other Special

Systems as Identified in the SOW

l. The Government will evaluate and consider materials and equipment proposed by brand name and model number as a quality standard. Unless substitution of a manufacturer, brand name or model is otherwise specifically prohibited in the contract, if the successful Offeror desires to substitute manufacturers, brand names or models after award, the substituted product must meet the contract requirements and be approved by the designer of record and the Government as equal in function, performance, quality and salient features to that initially proposed.

m. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guarantee that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements.

8.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

8.2.1. FACTOR 4 – DESIGN TECHNICAL APPROACH - QUALITY OF BUILDING

SYSTEMS:

a. It is the Army's objective that these buildings will have a 50 year useful life.

The design and construction should provide an appropriate level of quality to ensure the continued use of the facility over that time period with the application of reasonable preventive maintenance and repairs that would be industry-acceptable to a major civilian sector project OWNER. The facility design should consider that the Army may repurpose the use of the facility over the 50 year life. Within that overriding theme the Government will evaluate the Offeror selected systems and components proposed in terms of warranties provided, maintenance considerations (frequency, estimated cost, access, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability (withstand troop usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (HVAC, lighting, power, etc.). The minimum acceptable level of quality for finishes and materials for these buildings are those materials suitable for the expected population and usage.

Residential or similar grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in these buildings.

1) The Government encourages the Offeror place emphasis on those design features which optimize and emphasize functional/operational requirements; interior/exterior finishes and systems; and life cycle/ energy efficiency. The following items will be considered in the evaluation of the building systems and materials of the various facilities:

2) Architectural Finishes. Satisfactory proposals include finishes which provide usable spaces for the intended purposes. Proposals will receive additional consideration for materials offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

3) Architectural Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

4) Mechanical Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic environmental control function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, reduce energy consumption, sustainability, maintainability (cyclical maintenance, access, equipment placement), and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

5) Plumbing Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary.

Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

6) Electrical Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary.

Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

7) ATFP Considerations. This consideration verifies the inclusion/compliance with the building related (laminate windows, design for progressive collapse, etc.) ATFP minimum standard constraints included in the Statement of Work. All proposals must be compliant with the ATFP requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Satisfactory proposals are compliant with all ATFP requirements.

8) Site Utilities Components and Site Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, and sustainability, have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

9) Energy Conservation: Proposals will receive a Satisfactory rating if they describe a feasible strategy to achieve required energy savings stated in the RFP.

8.2.2. Design Technical Approach – Quality of Building Systems. Will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions.

8.2.2.1. OUTSTANDING - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

8.2.2.2. GOOD - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

8.2.2.3. ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

8.2.2.4. MARGINAL - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

8.2.2.5. UNACCEPTABLE - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

9. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS

FACTOR 3 (Design Technical – Building Function and Aesthetics) will be equal in importance to FACTOR 1 (Past Performance) and more important than FACTOR 2 (Design Experience) and FACTOR 4 (Design Technical Approach – Quality of Building Systems).

FACTOR 4 (Design Technical Approach – Quality of Building Systems) is more important than FACTOR 2 (Design Experience).

FACTOR 5 (Price) is LESS important than all other Factors when they are combined.

10. PHASE II – FACTOR 5 – PRICE.

10.1. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in establishing the competitive range prior to discussions (if held) and in making the best value decision for award of any resultant contract. Prices and mark-ups shall be proposed and submitted on the Task Order Pricing Schedule shown at Section 00010 - Schedule A of the solicitation.

10.2. The Government will perform a price analysis on all proposals received. Price analysis will be performed on Schedule A in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine fairness and reasonableness. Historical price information, competitive price information, the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), or any other pricing tool as necessary will be utilized in this analysis. The evaluation will determine the extent to which the price proposal is consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Offerors are advised that any offer wherein pricing is deemed unfair or unreasonable will be rendered ineligible for award.

10.3. The Government shall use the total evaluated price from Schedule A as the evaluated price for making the best value decision.

11. BASIS FOR AWARD

11.1. Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include capability in accordance with the evaluation criteria and responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.104.

11.2. In order to determine which proposal represents the best value, a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in this RFP will be conducted, and in turn, the Government will compare proposals to one another. The Government will award three to five contracts to the responsible Offeror whose technical submittal and price proposal contains the combination of those criteria described in this document offering the best value to the Government.

11.3. The successful Offerors, if any, will be awarded a MATOC with a ceiling of $45 Million and a $2,500.00 guaranteed minimum for the base ordering period.

11.4. As technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between proposals are of increased importance in determining the most advantageous proposal. Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in scoring and relative advantages and disadvantages between proposals are of increased importance to the determination.

11.5. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest reasonably priced Offeror. The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers.

11.6. Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer.

Attachment 1

DESIGN & CONSTRUCT

RESTORE BUILDING D-2450 (TEMF)

PROJECT NUMBER: FA-19201-14

1. Brief Description of the Scope of Work: The scope of work for this design/build project includes the design and rehabilitation of Building D-2450 a Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility (TEMF) at Fort Bragg. The work shall include but not be limited to:

demolition, repair and replacement of the building envelope for weather tightness (i.e.

exterior skin), interior finishes (walls, doors, windows, painting, ceilings, flooring), engineering disciplines (mechanical, including HVAC system, exhaust system; electrical (including lighting and correcting any life/safety & electrical code violations); lightning protection assessment & installation, if required, plumbing including bathrooms (including new fixtures & finishes), eyewash stations & emergency showers; fire alarm/detection/suppression & mass notification operations), telecommunications (computer & telephone), storage spaces, compressed air, moisture remediation (if moisture is present), asbestos abatement, trench drainage system, handicap accessibility, ATFP, and security. All work shall be performed in accordance with current applicable federal, state & local codes, to include but not limited to: the Unified Facility Codes, International Building Code, ADA, NFPA, ASHRAE, and the IES Lighting Handbook.

2. Wage Decision NC160025 dated 11/04/2016 NC170025 dated 01/06/2017 NC25 (Attachment 2) applies to CLINS 0001 and 0013 of attached Task Order Pricing Schedule (Attachment 1). Offerors are reminded that wage determinations are subject to change prior to award. All proposed pricing shall include the most current wage rates.

All offerors are encouraged to review wage rates established by the Department of Labor prior to submitting proposals.

3. The contractor shall be assessed the amount of $1,159.99 liquidated damages per calendar day for failure to complete the prescribed work within the performance period.

4. Construction Cost Limitation (CCL) for all SRM Funded Line Items is $3,200,000.

This limitation includes both design and construction costs and shall not be exceeded.

Offers which exceed the CCL will be rendered ineligible for award.

5. Site Visits.

5.1. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.236-27, Site Visit (Construction), A site visit will be conducted at the Project Site, at Bldg. D-2450 on Fort Bragg, NC on 25 January 2017 beginning at 0900 hours. The POC for the site visit is Tommy Rose and he can be contacted at 910-396-4941 or e-mail at Thomas.W.Rose@usace.army.mil OR Karl Gabzdyl 910-643-4388, Karl.A.Gabzdyl@usace.army.mil.

5.2. Prior to the submission of any proposals, all offerors are required to visit the project site location to become familiar with the project requirements. A proposal will not be rejected only because the offeror fails to visit the project site. Failure to visit the project site will not relieve the bidder from responsibility for performance of the work and compliance with the terms and conditions of any resultant contract. In no event will a failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after award of the task order.

6. Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to ensure Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction, In accordance with FAR Clause 52.222-23:

7. AT/OPSEC Requirements:

AT Level I Training.

All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, and controlled access areas, or require network access, shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. Upon request, the contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. AT Level I awareness training is available at the following website: https://atlevel1.dtic.mil/at/; or it can be provided by the RA ATO in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum.

AT Awareness Training for Contractor Personnel Traveling Overseas.

All US based contractor employees and associated subcontractor employees traveling overseas will receive the government provided AOR specific AT awareness training. The documentation of training completion must be provided to the COR prior to departure.

Access, General Protection, and Security Policy and Procedures.

All contractor and all associated subcontractor employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government

Goals for Participation for Each Trade Percentages

Females 6.9%

Minority 26.2% representative). The contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks or background investigation and to meet installation/facility access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal, Director of Emergency Services, or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DOD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any installation or facility change, the Government may require changes in contractor security matters or processes.

Suspicious Activity Reporting Training.

The contractor and all associated subcontractors shall receive a briefing/training (provided by the RA) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after completion of the training.

Contractor Employees Who Require Access to Government Information Systems.

All contractor employees with access to a government information system must be registered in the Army Training Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) at the commencement of services, and must successfully complete the DOD Information Assurance Awareness training prior to access to the information systems and then annually thereafter in accordance with personnel security standards listed in AR 25-2 (Information Assurance), and appropriate background investigation will be conducted prior to accessing the government information systems.

For Contracts That Require an OPSEC Standing Operating Procedure / Plan.

The contractor shall develop an OPSEC SOP/Plan within 90 calendar days of contract award. The OPSEC SOP/Plan must be reviewed and approved by the RA OPSEC Officer. The SOP/Plan will include the government’s critical information, why it needs to be protected, where it is located, who is responsible for it and how to protect it. In addition, the contractor shall identify an individual who will be an OPSEC Coordinator.

For Contracts That Require OPSEC Training.

All new contractor employees will complete Level I OPSEC Training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. Additionally, all contractor employees must complete annual OPSEC awareness training. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training. OPSEC awareness training is available at the following websites: https://www.iad.gov/ioss/ or http://www.cdse.edu/catalog/operations-security.html; or it can be provided by the RA OPSEC Officer in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum.

For Information Assurance (IA)/Information Technology (IT) Training.

All contractor employees and associated subcontractor employees must complete the DOD IA awareness training before issuance of network access and annually thereafter. All contractor employees working IA/IT functions must comply with DOD and Army training requirements in DOD 8570.01, DOD 8570.01-M and AR 25-2 within six months of employment.

For Information Assurance (IA) and/or Information Technology (IT) Certification.

All contractor employees supporting IA/IT functions shall be appropriately certified upon contract IAW DOD 8570.01-M, DFARS 252.239-7001 and AR 25-

2. The baseline certification as stipulated in DOD 8570.01-M must be completed upon contract award.

For Contractors Authorized to Accompany the Force.

All contractor employees shall ensure the following AT/OPSEC requirements are met prior to deploying personnel authorized to accompany U.S. Armed Forces outside the United States; to include compliance with laws, regulations, pre-deployment requirements, and required training in accordance with combatant command guidance.

For Contract Requiring Performance or Delivery in a Foreign Country.

All non-local contracting personnel will comply with theater clearance requirements and allows the combatant commander to exercise oversight to ensure the contractor’s compliance with combatant commander and subordinate task force commander policies and directives.

For Contracts That Require Handling or Access to Classified Information.

Contractor shall comply with AR 380-67 (Personnel Security Program) and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (Policy for a Common Identification

Standard for…