TAM Industry Day 4.17.24.pptx
PPTX presentation 10 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912GB24X0100
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army European Command
About this file
This document is a PowerPoint presentation for an Industry Day meeting hosted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Europe District related to upcoming construction projects in Israel under the Foreign Military Financing (FMF) program.
The key details are:
- The industry day will be held on February 29, 2024 in Alexandria, VA to present information on the Israel FMF construction program, including upcoming design-build and design-bid-build opportunities valued at $1 billion over the next 3 years.
- The program currently has over $250 million in ongoing projects and anticipates 4-6 best value acquisitions ranging from $15-$350 million, as well as 15 additional task orders of $1-$15 million on future MATOC contracts.
- Only U.S. firms or joint ventures of U.S. firms are eligible for contract awards under NAICS code 236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.
- Interested firms must pre-register for the industry day by emailing the provided points of contact, and may submit comments/suggestions by February 9, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Industry Day DC Discussion Questions 2024 (Last Updated 8MAY2024).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Israel Industry Day Sign-In 4.17.24.pdf | ||
| Industry Day DC Attendance.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Israel program industry day
Transatlantic Middle East District 17 April 2024
SETTING THE STANDARD
| TIME | TOPIC | PRESENTER |
| 0900 | Opening Remarks/Organization/Placemat | COL Secrist |
| 0915 | Contracting Overview | Ms. Billman |
| 1000 | Break | Break |
| 1030 | Contracting Process | Ms. Billman |
| 1115 | Program Review | Mr. Davidi |
| 1200 | Meeting Adjourn | Meeting Adjourn |
AGENDA
New Design and Construction Agent for Israel program
USACE structure
USACE Headquarters ( Washington, DC ) Promulgate policy + secure resources + leverage National Client Management Regionally Aligned Divisions Deliver programs + steward resources + nurture Regional Relationships Geographic Districts Deliver projects + Run a “profitable” business + optimize Local Partnerships Centers and Laboratories 40+ Centers of Expertise Centers of Standardization Active-Duty Battalion 249 EN BN ( Prime Power )
Army Reserve Theater Engineer Commands
USACE
Finance Center
249th Prime Power Battalion
412th Engineer Command
Marine Design Center
USACE
Logistics Agency
Institute for Water Resources
Army Geospatial Center
Buffalo Chicago Detroit Louisville Nashville
Mississippi Valley Division Vicksburg Memphis St. Paul St. Louis
Baltimore
Seattle
Omaha
Portland
Alaska
Far East
Savannah
Mobile
South Pacific Division
Southwestern Division
Tulsa
416th Engineer Command
LRC
LRB
LRE
Huntington
LRL
LRN
LRP
Pittsburgh
MVP
MVS
MVM
MVK
NWO
NWK
Kansas City
NWP
NWS
NWW
Walla Walla
POF
POA
POH
Honolulu
POJ
Japan
SAJ
Jacksonville
SAC
Charleston
SAM
SAS
SAW
Wilmington
SPK
Sacramento
SPA
Albuquerque
SPL
Los Angeles
SPN
San Francisco
SWG
Galveston
SWF
Fort Worth
SWL
Little Rock
SWT
SWD
HECSA
Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity
UFC
IWR
ULA
MDC
HNC
Engineering and Support Center ( Huntsville )
ERDC
Engineer Research and Development Center
AGC
TAD
( Alexandria, VA ) ( Cincinnati, OH ) ( Vicksburg, MS ) ( New York City, NY ) ( Portland, OR ) ( Honolulu, HI ) ( Atlanta, GA ) ( San Francisco, CA ) ( Dallas, TX ) ( Winchester, VA ) ( Millington, TN ) ( Alexandria, VA ) ( Millington, TN ) ( Philadelphia, PA ) ( Fort Belvoir, VA ) ( Huntsville, AL ) ( Vicksburg, MS ) ( Alexandria, VA ) ( Vicksburg, MS ) ( Darien, IL )
Field Operating Activity
CIVIL WORKS Mission ONLY
LTC / O-5 District Commands ( 9 of 43 ) [ All other Districts = COL / O-6 Commands ]
Headquarters USACE
LRD
Great Lakes and Ohio River Division
MVD
NAD
NWD
POD
SAD
SPD
North Atlantic Division
EUCOM / AFRICOM
Pacific Ocean Division
PACOM
Transatlantic Division
CENTCOM
South Atlantic Division
SOUTHCOM
Northwestern Division
NORTHCOM
TAE
Expeditionary
TAM
Middle East
( Winchester, VA )
MILITARY PROGRAMS Mission ONLY
CW / MP / IIS Missions
LRB
Rock Island
MVR
New Orleans
MVN
Europe
New York Norfolk Philadelphia New England
NAB
NAN
NAO
NAE
NAP
NAU
MIDDLE EAST DISTRICT CHAIN OF COMMAND
TAM Israel TEAM organization chart COL Secrist Commander
PM OIR ESSAYONS
INACTIVE
ORG
N011ES4 RFXXXX
Ofer Davidi Israel Branch Program Manager Forward Pete DeMattei Israel Branch Chief
Ramin Sabet Engineering Deputy Chief Greg Taylor Engineering DIV Chief
Ken Baker Contracting Construction Branch Chief MAJ Space Contracting Israel Contracting Officer (KO) Lisa Billman Contracting DIV Chief Michelle Pearman Contracting Deputy Chief Neal Thibault Construction Deputy Chief Tom Waters Directorate of Programs Paul Holcomb Construction DIV Chief Stason Sellers Israel Construction Manager
MAJ Garner Israel Deputy Area Engineer Orly Koren Israel Design Liaison (COR) Key
Denotes Direct Reporting Relationship:
Denotes OPCON Reporting Relationship:
Denotes National Org Office:
Denotes Forward in Israel:
Rob Corkrum Contracting Israel Contracting Officer (KO) Cynthia Darlington Engineering Design Branch Chief Sean O’Bannon Engineering Israel Design Manager (COR) Transition Lead Mark Koppenhaver Engineering Israel Design Manager Greg Schultz Israel Area Engineer Carlos Estrella Construction Quality Assurance Branch Chief Rob McKenney District Counsel Rebecca Bockmann Deputy Counsel/ Lead Counsel for Israel Branch
Robert Leitch Israel Branch Project Manager
(NAU)
MAJ Terbilcox Israel Branch Project Manager
Joey Behr PPMD Deputy Chief LTC Aki Israel Branch Officer Forward
Data as of 3 APR 2024 Israel Program Manager Forward Ofer Davidi (FSN)
RSO Liaison Eyal Markman (FSN)
Area Engineer Gregory M. Schulz, P.E
CENTRAL RESIDENT OFFICE
(Tel Nof, Israel)
Resident Engineer
VACANT
Civil Engineer David Teper-Braverman (FSN)
Infotech Spec. Alex Kotovski (FSN)
Lead PE Adam Beris (FSN)
Secretary Ravit Uzan (FSN) Civil Engineer Yair Shani (FSN) Electrical Engineer David Fils (FSN) Civil Engineer Itzik Ruimy (FSN)
Deputy Area Engineer MAJ James Garner
Civil Engineer
VACANT
Const Control Rep
VACANT
Const Control Rep
VACANT
SOUTHERN RESIDENT OFFICE
(Be’er Sheva, Israel)
Resident Engineer Douglas Wesemann
Sr. Project Engineer
VACANT
Civil Engineer Richard Grace Secretary Flavia Rosenberg (FSN) Lead PE
VACANT (FSN)
Sr. Project Engineer Benjamin Diamond
Civil Engineer) Reuven Granek (FSN) Const Control Rep Kevin Braniff Const Control Rep Geoffrey Taft
Const Control Rep
VACANT
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SECTION
(Herzliya, Israel)
Office Engineer (Civil)
VACANT
Office Engineer (Civil)
Lead Office Eng Shimon Solway (FSN) Secretary Smadar Zvuloni (FSN)
Engineer Tech (Civil)
Civil Engineer Orly Koren (FSN) Const Control Rep Joseph Campbell Mechanical Engineer
VACANT (FSN)
Supr Civil Engineer
AREA OFFICE
(Herzliya, Israel)
Const Control Rep
Michael Dominguez Engineer Tech (Civil)
| NAME | TITLE | |
| Continuing Israel Program Team Members | ||
| Mr. Ofer Davidi | FMF Program Manager Forward | ofer.davidi@usace.army.mil |
| Mr. Robert Corkrum | PCO/Contract Specialist | robert.e.corkrum@usace.army.mil |
| Mr. Greg Schulz | Area Engineer, Israel | gregory.m.schulz@usace.army.mil |
| Mr. Steve Paul | Administrative Contracting Officer | steven.m.paul@usace.army.mil |
| Mr. Doug Wesemann | Administrative Contracting Officer | doug.a.wesemann@usace.army.mil |
| New Israel Program Team Members | ||
| Mr. Pete DeMattei | Israel Branch Chief | peter.a.demattei@usace.army.mil |
| MAJ Dan Terbilcox | Project Manager | daniel.f.terbilcox@usace.army.mil |
| Mr. Ofer Davidi | FMF Program Manager Forward | ofer.davidi@usace.army.mil |
| Mr. Sean O’Bannon | A-E Contracting Officer’s Rep (COR) | sean.o’bannon@usace.army.mil |
| MAJ Jonathan Space | Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) | jonathan.m.space@usace.army.mil |
Key TAM Israel Points of contact
Overview – The Israel FMS Program supports U.S. foreign policy and regional security goals by enabling Israel to improve their defense capabilities and work toward common security goals while cementing cooperative bilateral military relationships and enhancing interoperability with U.S. forces. Projects range from military facilities to infrastructure.
History – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been involved in construction in Israel since the 1979 Camp David Accords called for construction of facilities to replace ones vacated in the agreement.
Execution:
$1.2B in total active Letters of Offer and Acceptance (LOAs).
$100M average annual awards.
Currently 5 projects in construction valued at $172M Major programs – Israel foreign military sales
ISRAEL
Typical Projects Support of F35i (Hangers, Airfields/Runways, Fueling Stations, Squadron Ops, Training Facilities, Simulators) Ammunition Storage Barracks Command and Control Facilities Intelligence Facilities Military Port Expansion Pier construction
PLACEMAT
Contracting overview
SETTING THE STANDARD
Foreign Military Financing (FMF) requires that the prime contractor or joint venture contractors be United States firms.
In accordance with Section 42(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (22 USC §2791(c)), FMF funds may not be used to award to a foreign firm, unless an Offshore Procurement (OSP) determination is made by the Director, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
No OSP determination has been obtained for any current FMF requirement in Israel. Offers from other than United States firms are ineligible for award.
The Government reserves the right, however, to seek an OSP determination at any stage in the procurement process on a project-by-project basis, if doing so is in the Government’s best interests.
Foreign Military FINANCING
Prime contractors performing in Israel must be U.S. firms Contractors registered in and regularly doing business in the United States Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a US business Contractors must possess a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code
The Contracting Officer will perform a responsibility determination based on FAR 9
Prime contractors will be required to perform work with their own labor Defined in the solicitation/contract Offerors will attest to their percentage of performance at time of proposal submission
U.S. Firm Defined
An Offeror that is part of a Joint Venture (JV)must submit a legally binding JV agreement that:
Identifies the Chief Executive of each entity Is signed by an authorized officer from each of the firms comprising the JV Is complete and must be the only JV agreement for the contract and work under the contract Specifies that all JV members are jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract JV agreement must be in English
The Government will not evaluate the capability of any Offerors not included in the JV agreement.
If one of the JV parties possesses relevant past performance or expertise required by the solicitation, its past performance or expertise will be considered as that of the JV.
U.S. Joint Ventures
Performance and Payment Bonds:
Instruments executed by an offeror (principal), and a second party (surety) to assure fulfillment of the principal’s obligations to a third party (Government) Required for construction contracts exceeding $150,000 (could be required for service/supply) Must equal 100% of the contract price unless reduced by the contracting officer Bonds may be waived if it is impracticable for the contractor to furnish a bond; or as otherwise authorized
Corporate bonding sureties must be in the Treasury's Listing of Approved Sureties (Treasury Circular 570) Circular 570 Listing here: https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/c570.htm Other acceptable bonding sureties (FAR 28.203, 28.204):
Individual sureties, US bonds/notes Certified/Cashier’s check or money order, Irrevocable Letter of Credit
Bonding – FAR Part 28
Bid Bond/bid guarantees Required when a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is necessary Shall be at 20% of the price offered, but not over $3M Assures the offeror will not withdraw an offer, will execute the contract, and will furnish bonds May be waived by the Chief of the Contracting Office
Bonding – FAR Part 28
Construction Administrative Contracting Officers (ACOs) will not change TAM will continue to appoint ACOs as turn-over occurs
Projects are located on Israeli installations Access may vary by location Special Requirement (SR) 03 is included in solicitations with specific instructions Israeli citizen and workers from all countries that have diplomatic relationship with Israel can be submitted for approval for access This may be subject to change; check specific solicitations Incumbent upon offerors to investigate at the time of solicitation issuance Future projects IMOD will use web system, Zakif, for submitting base access information This should expedite the process
Current conditions are improved since October 7th All projects are underway Approximately over 500 workers have resumed working
Firms should monitor conditions in Israel through the State Department advisories at Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Travel Advisory (state.gov) aspects of Construction in Israel
Special taxation exemptions for U.S. contractors and Third Country Nationals (TCNs)
Reimbursement of Value-Added Tax (VAT) U.S. prime contractors receive the VAT back from Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) on every monthly invoice approved by USACE Value of 17%
Indirect TAX Contractor receives 1%-3 % of the total value of the contract from IMOD Mission in NY
Reimbursement of TCN taxes Tax plan is required to be submitted Must address prime and subcontractor TCNs
All details are in SECTION 00 74 15 of issued solicitations
Value-added Tax
Solicitation process through PIEE
Contracting Officers are required to use the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module to post Solicitations and Amendments.
PIEE SOLICITATION MODULE
Solicitation process
PIEE Attachments will NOT migrate to SAM – all processes are conducted through PIEE
Documents/solicitations will NOT be posted separately in SAM.gov
USACE synopsizes requirements in SAM
USACE posts solicitation in PIEE
USACE may restrict solicitation to cleared vendors
USACE posts amendments
Vendors upload proposals
Vendors access solicitation
Vendors receive an email confirming the date/time their offer/bid was properly uploaded in the PIEE Solicitation Module
Vendors create account in Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE)
Vendors obtain a CAGE/NCAGE and register in the System for Award Management (SAM)
To register a new entity at System for Award Management, https://sam.gov, firms will need the following:
For US Registrants:
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code Taxpayer Identification Number and taxpayer name
For International Registrants:
NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE).
If you don’t have one you can request one for free at https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/CageTool.
All new activations AND renewals require a notarized letter formally appointing an Entity Administrator Firms must prepare, sign, and submit a letter designating your Entity Administrator to the Federal Service Desk within 60 days of activation Allow up to 12-15 business days after you submit before your registration is active in SAM
NEW Entity registration in SAM
Letters may be disapproved for:
Failure to provide information required by the template letter Failure to include a statement clarifying your account administration preference Information mis-matching
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.1103 provides for:
Delayed award if needs of agency permits to allow firm time to complete registration; if firm does not complete within time specified, KO may award to the next otherwise successful registered offeror If the needs of the agency do NOT permit delayed award, award to the next otherwise successful registered offeror after written approval one level above the KO
Contracting Officers may not delay award of contracts, modifications or option periods It is the contractor’s responsibility to maintain SAM registration Throughout the life of the proposal and contract periods
Failure to maintain active SAM registration may make a contractor ineligible for award
Entity validation processing
Example of SAM synopsis and links
The opportunity description will still be posted to SAM, with links to the PIEE solicitation and PIEE registration instructions:
– All documents, attachments, etc. are only located in PIEE
All full and open solicitations will be posted via the Federal Opportunities page on http://www.SAM.gov
In the “Search Contract Opportunities” type “W912ER”
Federal Opportunities - SAM
All full and open solicitations will be also be posted on the PIEE Solicitation Module (search located at bottom of page):
– In “Solicitation Number” type “W912ER”
– Logging into PIEE is NOT required to search publicly
Search feature in piee
PIEE – New User registration
PIEE – New User registration
PIEE – New User registration
General Steps for a Vendor to follow to use PIEE:
Step 1: Register with the System for Award Management (SAM).
(This is a mandatory step)
Step 2: Ensure CAGE/NCAGE Code is added to the PIEE Vendor Group Structure.
(This is a mandatory step)
Step 3: Designate a Contract Administrator (CAM).
(This is a mandatory step)
Step 4: CAM needs to Self-Register in PIEE.
(This is a mandatory step – there must be a CAM to activate vendors)
You should not:
Duplicate the specifications or Statement of Work Include marketing information Vaguely state how the requirement will be completed Provide redundant information in multiple sections Submit in formats other than those directed in the solicitation Assume the Government will extend the time for offers
You should:
Include relevant lessons learned and how challenges were resolved Fully describe your approach as instructed by each solicitation factor/element Respond to sources sought inquiries Ask lots of questions, RFIs Be registered in SAM and PIEE weeks before offer submission (JV must be its own entity) Allow time to obtain accurate subcontractor pricing Fill-in all appropriate provisions and clauses Submit the offer before the due date/time
Proposal submission
Advanced Payments and Mobilization Costs
Balance of Payments Program
Defense Base Act (DBA) Insurance
Federal Excise Tax
Military Construction in Foreign Countries
Prohibited Sources
Proposal Preparation
SAM Registration
Prohibition of Certain Telecom Equipment & Services
Informal Brochures
Middle East District Public > Business With Us > Contracting (army.mil) available contracting procurement strategies & methods
SETTING THE STANDARD
Prequalification procedures may be used when necessary to ensure timely and efficient performance of critical construction projects. Prequalification— Results in a list of sources determined to be qualified to perform a specific construction contract; and Limits offerors to those with proven competence to perform in the required manner.
Chief of the Contracting Office must— Authorize the use of prequalification by determining, in writing, that a construction project is of an urgency or complexity that requires prequalification; and Approve the prequalification procedures Pre-qualification of sources
MULTI-STEP ADVISORY PROCESS
FAR 15.202 Advisory multi-step process
(a) The agency may publish a presolicitation notice (see 5.204) that provides a general description of the scope or purpose of the acquisition and invites potential offerors to submit information that allows the Government to (1a)advise the offerors about their potential to be viable competitors. The presolicitation notice should identify the information that must be submitted and the criteria that will be used in making the initial evaluation. Information sought may be limited to a statement of qualifications and other appropriate information (e.g., proposed technical concept, past performance, and limited pricing information). At a minimum, the notice shall contain (1b)sufficient information to permit a potential offeror (1c) to make an informed decision about whether to participate in the acquisition. This process should not be used for multi-step acquisitions where it would result in offerors being required to submit identical information in response to the notice and in response to the initial step of the acquisition.
(b) The agency shall (2)evaluate all responses in accordance with the criteria stated in the notice and shall (3)advise each respondent in writing either that it will be (3a)invited to participate in the resultant acquisition or, based on the information submitted, that it is (3b)unlikely to be a viable competitor. The agency shall advise respondents considered not to be viable competitors of the general basis for that opinion. The agency shall inform all respondents that, notwithstanding the advice provided by the Government in response to their submissions, they may participate in the resultant acquisition.
*Emphasis for illustration purposes.
SETTING THE STANDARD
SETTING THE STANDARD
Coordination Issue pre-solicitation notice per 15.202 Hold in-person & virtual meetings led by the Contracting Officer Between the Government team members and potential Offerors
Collaboration Seek to better understand industry experience, performance and schedule capabilities Build project-specific strategy based on feedback Tailored solicitations that include industry feedback
Instruction Potential for workshops with Offerors on DoD/Army/USACE processes, procedures, registrations, and surety requirements
Advisement Viability or non-viability as a competitor Provide general basis for conclusion Expected results
SETTING THE STANDARD
SETTING THE STANDARD
Current and upcoming tools
SETTING THE STANDARD
| EXISTING TOOL | TYPE | TOTAL CAPACITY | USED | AVAILABLE | PERCENT CAPACITY AVAILABLE |
| North Design Bid Build MATOC | Construction | $50M | $20.1M | $29.9M | 59.8% |
| South Design Bid Build MATOC | Construction | $50M | $8.6M | $41.4M | 82.9% |
| Taxi/Runway MATOC | Construction | $50M | $7.5K | $49.9M | 99.9% |
| General A-E MATOC | Architect-Engineer | $35M | $7.5K | $34.9M | 99.9% |
| AFRICOM/ISR Environmental MATOC | Architect-Engineer | $30M | $11.8M | $18.2M | 60.7% |
Current Israel-specific contract tools
| PLANNED TOOL | TYPE | TOTAL CAPACITY PLANNED | SCOPE | |
| Prefabricated Concrete Elements | Supply | $50M | ||
| ($10 / year) | Concrete prefab elements, shelters, etc., using a price book and items/level of effort |
| EXISTING TOOL | TYPE | TOTAL CAPACITY | SCOPE |
| Relocatable Buildings (RLB), CENTCOM AOR | |||
| Supply | $250M | Manufacture, shipping, and delivery of relocatable buildings (RLBs) with energy efficient systems (R-20+ walls and R-40 roof envelope assemblies). Minor incidental construction would primarily support site preparation activities and infrastructure, to include (but not limited to) minor demolition, clearing, grubbing, grading, compaction, foundation related work, and utility connections and/or installation of utility tanks or generators for projects that do not have access to public utilities. | |
| Master Planning, CENTCOM AOR | Architect-Engineer | $24.0M |
$23.8M remaining Master planning; identifying & quantifying facility requirements; facility management support; facility utilization studies; land use requirements studies & analyses; engineering analyses; infrastructure studies; geospatial projects; environmental documentation; energy studies; energy modeling and economic calculations; facility energy analysis; project programming and procurement documents for military installations, facilities, land, and utilities; and related issues associated with internal “fence to fence” and external “military to civilian community” planning tasks.
AVAILABLE contract tools
| TOOL | TYPE | CAPACITY | SCOPE |
| Design MATOC | |||
| Architect-Engineer | $240M | Award of up to seven A-E contracts under a five-year IDIQ MATOC consisting of one three-year base period and one two-year option period. The IDIQ MATOC contracts are intended for use by TAD districts to provide A-E support services for USACE design and construction activities conducted throughout the TAD AOR. The scope of the A-E services contemplated under the MATOC includes, but is not limited to, design, quality control, construction phase support, and technical subject matter expert support. The A-E contracts will support Military Construction (MILCON), |
Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Host Nation (HN), Operations and Maintenance (O&M), and other design support efforts.
Center of Standardization for Non-Permanent Facilities SATOC Architect-Engineer $9M Services to be provided include but are not limited to: (1) The development, conversion, and revision of drawings, bill of materials (BOM), Labor and Equipment Estimates (LEE) and construction process management estimates for a variety of facilities and installations in contingency operations; (2) Analysis of Theater of Operations (TO) Army Construction and facility requirements and preparation of criteria and plans for updating CoS standard facilities to satisfy those requirements.
Planned CENTCOM-Wide contract tools
On ramp procedures TAM may re-open competition Solicit for new firms to join MATOC pool Evaluation criteria will be identical to initial evaluation criteria Existing contractors in pool will not compete Once awarded, all contractors will compete for task orders Original contract ceiling and maximum periods of performance remain
Off ramp procedures TAM may utilize by termination or opting not to exercise optional periods
MATOC On/off ramp procedures
1.16.1 On-Ramp Procedures: a. The Government reserves the right to re-open competition at any time during the term of the contract. The Contracting Officer intends to periodically review the need for additional Contractors during the contract period of performance (PoP). If it is determined to be in the Government's best interest to add Contractors, an "on-ramp" may be executed. When an "on-ramp" is used, the Government will advertise the reopening of the competition on BetaSam.gov. All new awardees shall meet the criteria established in the initial solicitation. The evaluation and selection of awardees for any "on-ramp" will be the same as the evaluation and award criteria used for the initial Basic IDIQ contract award. The anticipated number of awards will be announced in the reopening announcement posted to BetaSam.gov; however the Contracting Officer has the discretion to award more or fewer contracts than the number anticipated in the solicitation depending upon the quality of the offers received. b. Any Contractor that received a basic contract award shall not re-compete. The new awardee(s) will compete with any existing or remaining Contractors for all task orders. Any additions due to "On-Ramp" will not impact the contract ceiling. The ordering period for new awardees will not extend the overall maximum term of the original contract, nor shall it re-establish the contract base period. The new awardee(s) will be eligible to compete for future task order requests for proposals issued against the Basic IDIQ contract. The Government will not consider unsolicited requests for additional Contractors. 1.16.2. Off-Ramp Procedures: The Government reserves the right to utilize off-ramps when it is determined in the best interest of the Government. The Government may off-ramp a Contractor by implementing a termination for convenience, implementing a termination for default, or taking any other action permitted by the contract terms and conditions.
Program slides
SETTING THE STANDARD
Upcoming opportunities
| Country | Fund Type | Project Type | Project Name | Magnitude Range | Design Strategy | Design Start (FY/QTR) | Construction Acquisition Strategy | Advertise (FY/QTR) | Scope Summary | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | CH53K | Between $100M and $250M | AE | Ongoing | Full and Open | Q1/FY25 | Beddown for CH53K. 2 Hangars, combat depot, infrastructure, wash rack, parking and aprons | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | HQ 328 | Between $5M and $10M | IMOD | Ongoing | MATOC | Q3/FY24 | 1 story vertical office building designed for net zero | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | Defense Systems Utilities | Between $100M and $250M | IMOD | Q2/FY24 | Full and Open | Q2/FY25 | 3 Office Bldgs, workshop, lab, log center, automated warehouse | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | F-35 Beddown # 2 | Between $250M and $500M | IMOD | FY24 | Full and Open | Q2/FY25 | ||
| Maintenance, Hangar, tech center, squadron bldg., storage complex, comm bldg., aviation storage complex, simulator, engine repair shop, paint shop | ||||||||||
| Israel | ERC | Construction | CJOC | Between | ||||||
| $1M and $5M | AE | Completed | MATOC | Q3/FY24 | Eletric, HVAC, and finish works | |||||
| Israel | ERC | Construction | CJOC Fencing and pavements | Between | ||||||
| $1M and $5M | AE | Q3/FY24 | ||||||||
| MATOC | Q2/FY25 | Fencing, asphalt paving | ||||||||
| Israel | ERC | Construction | Hot Cargo Pad | Between | ||||||
| $5M and $10M | AE | |||||||||
| Q2/FY25 | MATOC | |||||||||
| Q1/FY26 | ||||||||||
| Concrete and Asphalt paving | ||||||||||
| Israel | ERC | Construction | Pre-Fab Barracks | Between | ||||||
| $1M and $5M | AE | |||||||||
| Completed | MATOC | |||||||||
| Q2/FY25 | ||||||||||
| Residential, showers/Bathrooms |
Upcoming opportunities
| Country | Fund Type | Project Type | Project Name | Magnitude Range | Design Strategy | Design Start (FY/QTR) | Construction Acquisition Strategy | Advertise (FY/QTR) | Scope Summary | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | Infirmary | Between $10M and $25M | AE | Ongoing | MATOC | Q3/FY24 | 1200 SM Combat support facility 2 story construction | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | Ammo Storage Facilities | Between $25M and $100M | AE | Ongoing | Full and Open | Q2FY25 | Complex of facilities, temp control storage, 2 support bldgs. For ammo assembly | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Supply | Prefab Elements | |||||||
| (includes a seed TO) | Seed TO Range $5M and $10M | IMOD | Completed | MATOC | Q3/FY24 | Concrete prefab elements, shelters, etc., using a price book and items/level of effort | ||||
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | Atlit HQ Building (INF) | Between $10M and $25M | IMOD | Ongoing | Full and Open | 1Q/FY25 | HQ Office Bldg. for Navy, administrative space, secure space | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Design | F35 Paint Facility | Between $1M and $5M | AE | Q3/FY24 | ||||
| TORN | Israel AE MATOC | F35 Paint Facility | ||||||||
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Design | TAMA 58 | Between $1M and $5M | AE | Q3/FY24 | ||||
| TORN | Israel AE MATOC | Vehicle Maint. Facilities at 3 locations | ||||||||
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Construction | KC-46 | Between $25M and $100M | AE | Ongoing | Full and Open | Q4/FY24 | 12,000 SM beddown for new CK-46, hangar, supply storage, pump house, wash rack, equipment support facilities | |
| Israel | FMS/FMF | Design | CH53K | Between $1M and $5M | AE | Q3/FY24 | ||||
| TORN | Israel AE MATOC | CH53K Rotor maintenance facility |
image4.png image5.png image9.png image10.png image3.png image11.png image12.png image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.jpeg image17.png image18.png image19.png image20.png image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image25.png image26.png image27.png image28.png image29.png image30.png image31.png image32.png image33.png image1.png image2.png image6.png image7.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .