Amendment_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Central and Southern Florida Project for Flood Control and Other Purposes C-111, Detention Area and Other Features (Contract 8A), Miami-Dade County, Florida

This Amendment is being issued to:

1.DELETE Section 00100A and REPLACE w ith the attached revised Section 00100A.

2.APreproposal Conference is scheduled for August 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM. The Slides w ill be posted to FBO.

See Attached Summary of Changes

All other conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 25

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Aug-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912EP-16-R-0027

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Jul-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Aug-2016

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, JACKSONVILLE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

701 SAN MARCO BLVD

JACKSONVILLE FL 32207-8175

W912EP 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912EP-16-R-0027 -2- AMENDMENT 0004

SF 30 CONTINUATION SHEET

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SPECIFICATIONS:

Changes to Specifications:

Volume 1 of 2 – Contract Documents:

DELETE Section 00100A and REPLACE with the attached REVISED Section 00100A.

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-1 AMENDMENT 0004

SECTION 00100A

SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

A. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in Part FAR 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

B. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY

ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the lowest evaluated price proposal with acceptable non-priced proposal (Technical and Past Performance). In order to permit efficient competition, the following methodology will be utilized. The Government will evaluate the proposals beginning with the proposal with the lowest price to the highest price until it reaches the first responsive and responsible Offeror who achieves Acceptable ratings in all non-priced factors. Prices will then be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(a). That Offeror will be selected for award and the remainder of the proposals will not be evaluated.

If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals both price and non-priced will be evaluated for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

C. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The solicitation requires the evaluation of Price (Factor 1) and Non-Priced Factors (Factor 2 – Corporate Relevant Experience, Factor 3 – Specialized Technical Experience, and Factor 4 – Past Performance).

Magnitude of Construction: The estimated cost of this project is between U.S.

$5,000,000 and $10,000,000.

The Primary NAICS code is 237990 with a small business size of $36.5 million.

D. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, AND FORMAT

The Government will not reimburse any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of any responses to this solicitation. Oral explanations or instructions to Offerors are not binding. Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-2 AMENDMENT 0004

solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation. In accordance with Paragraph 999.204-4003, Section 00100 of the Solicitation, any and all amendments to the solicitation will be distributed via the Federal Business Opportunities website. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to acknowledge any and all amendments in its proposal submission.

Offerors should not modify the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the price or non-priced proposal or add conditions, exceptions, or qualifications to their offers.

Should an Offeror include terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, that offer may be determined to be Unacceptable for award. Any questions related to specific terms and conditions contained within the solicitation should be submitted via Bidders Inquiry in ProjNet by not later than (NLT) the date specified in Section 00010A, Attachment A, Instructions For Technical Inquires and Questions, prior to submission of an offer. Notwithstanding the above, the Offeror must clearly describe in its proposal (Price and Non-Priced) any modifications to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation contained in its offer.

Offerors that include information in their proposals they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must clearly mark their proposals in accordance with the instructions at FAR clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition, paragraph (e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, in Section 00100 of the Solicitation.

Offerors shall place the following notification on the bottom of each page of their proposals: “SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. DO

NOT DISCLOSE ANY SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION TO ANY

UNAUTHORIZED PERSON.”

Use of the words “will”, “shall”, or “must” indicates a mandatory requirement for which failure to comply, at the time and date for submission of proposals, shall result in the Offeror’s proposal being disqualified from consideration for award, unless the Government elects to established a competitive range and initiate discussions, thereby providing a means by which appropriate corrections by the Offeror(s) involved can be made. Failure to comply with pricing or non-pricing requirements that are annotated with the words “should” or “may” can result in an Unacceptable rating.

1. REQUIRED REGISTRATIONS

Failure to have an active and completed registration in System for Award Management (SAM): http://www.sam.gov/ database will determine an Offeror ineligible for award and removed from competition. An Acceptable offer with incomplete or expired registrations at the time of award may not be eligible for a contract. In such instances, the Government will award to the next Acceptable offer who is eligible for award.

Information contained within an Offeror’s registration must be current and valid. The responsibility of maintaining current information contained in an Offeror’s registration rests solely on the Offeror.

http://www.sam.gov/

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-3 AMENDMENT 0004

If an Offeror is a joint venture (JV), the JV entity must have a valid registration representing the JV as one business/firm/entity; this is applicable to SAM. The Government will not accept separate registrations and licenses for each separate entity representing the JV.

2. PROPOSAL CONTENT

The Offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying compact disc (CD), see Paragraph 999.215- 4003, Section 00100. The RFP shall provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal.

Information required with an Offeror’s priced and non-priced factors and sub-factors are described under Basis of Award and Evaluation Factors.

Offerors are required to submit proposals with the content specified herein. Proposals without the specified content may be determined Unacceptable and removed from the competition. The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to reject incomplete proposals after initial evaluation without further consideration.

The proposal shall be divided into volumes as indicated below. Each set of volumes shall be submitted and sealed separately. Each volume shall be marked with the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number, the volume number and stamped with “Original” or “Copy.” Each respective original or copy shall be separately bound or placed in a three-ring binder. See Attachment 6 – Proposal Format.

All proposals shall contain the evaluation requirements stated herein and every binder shall also contain: Table of Contents, List of Tables (if required), List of Figures (if required), List of Appendixes, and Name/Address/Telephone Number/e-mail address of the Offeror. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. No material (information not physically part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal the requested information specified herein.

Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted are current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone numbers.

The Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits specified within each evaluation factor. Elaborately prepared proposals are not required, and any material in excess of what is requested, such as corporate marketing information, will not be considered. Failing to submit or completely fill out attachments properly may result in rejection of the offer without further evaluation. Therefore, Offerors are urged to follow instructions and raise questions through inquiries if instructions are not understood. Do not include references to material or information not found within its respective volumes. Information submitted in the wrong volumes could lead to an Offeror’s proposal being determined Unacceptable if materially incomplete in any aspect.

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-4 AMENDMENT 0004

Written proposals are due no later than what is stated in Block 13 of the SF1442 to the address specified in Block 7 of the SF 1442.

a. VOLUME ONE (Factor 1) – Price: (1 Original, 1 Copy)

Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted are current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone

b. VOLUME TWO (Factor 2) – Corporate Relevant Experience (1 Original, 5

Copies):

Responses shall be organized in Volume Two. Do not include pricing information in Volume Three. NOTE: Page Limitations Not to Exceed 150 Pages.

c. VOLUME THREE (Factor 3) – Specialized Technical Experience (1 Original, 5

Copies):

Responses to Each Sub-Factor shall be organized shall be organized in Volume 2. Do not include pricing information in Volume Three. NOTE: Page Limitations Not to Exceed 150 Pages.

d. VOLUME FOUR (Factor 4) – Past Performance Package (1 Original, 1 Copy):

The information required within an offeror’s past performance proposal is described under Basis of Award and Evaluation Factors. Do not include pricing information in Volume Four.

All proposals shall contain the evaluation requirements stated herein and every binder shall also contain: Table of Contents, List of Tables (if required), List of Figures (if required), List of Appendixes, and Name/Address/Telephone Number/e-mail address of the Offeror. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. No material (information not part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. The offeror shall submit in the proposal the requested information specified herein.

Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted are current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone

The Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits specified within each evaluation factor. Elaborately prepared proposals are not required, and any material in excess of what is requested, such as corporate marketing information, will not be considered. Failing to submit or completely fill out attachments properly may result in rejection of the offer without further evaluation. Therefore, Offerors are urged to follow instructions and raise questions through inquiries if instructions are not understood. Do not include references to material or information not found within its

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-5 AMENDMENT 0004

respective volumes. Information submitted in the wrong volumes could lead to an Offeror’s proposal being determined Unacceptable if materially incomplete in any aspect.

Written proposals are due no later than what is stated in Block 13 of the SF1442 to the addresses specified in Block 7 of the SF 1442:

Attn: Claurice M. Dingle Contract Specialist Claurice.M.Dingle@usace.army.mil

E. DEBRIEFING OF UNSUCCESSFUL OFFERORS

The Contracting Officer will ensure Offerors are debriefed, if requested, in accordance with FAR Subparts 15.5.

F. BASIS OF AWARD

Subject to the provisions contained herein, award will be made to one (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR; who conforms to the solicitation requirements; provides the lowest evaluated price and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, meets the technically acceptable standard for the non-price factors.

Prices will be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(a).

To be considered acceptable (non-priced factors), no non-priced factors/sub-factors in the proposal may be rated as “unacceptable”. The failure of a proposal to meet all of the requirements under any non-priced factor/sub-factor will result in an unacceptable rating and precluded from award.

In order to permit efficient competition, the following methodology will be utilized.

Proposals will be placed in order of price (lowest price to highest price). The Government will evaluate the proposals beginning with the proposal with the lowest price to the highest price until it reaches the first responsive and responsible Offeror who achieves acceptable ratings in all non-priced factors/sub-factors. Prices will then be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404- 1(a). I f p r i c e s a r e d e t e r m i n e d f a i r a n d r e a s o n a b l e , that Offeror will be selected for award and the remainder of the proposals will not be evaluated.

The Government intends to award a contract without discussions, but reserves the right to hold discussions if the Government determines that to do so would be in its best interests. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

Joint Ventures: A joint venture is defined as a legal business entity formed between two or more companies to undertake the performance activities of a contract together.

mailto:Claurice.M.Dingle@usace.army.mil

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-6 AMENDMENT 0004

Offerors proposing as joint ventures shall provide evidence that the joint venture as a legal entity has been duly formed. Joint ventures shall include a copy of the legal joint venture agreement signed by an authorized officer from each of the firms comprising the joint venture, with the chief executive of each entity identified. The Government will not evaluate the capability of any firms that are not included in the joint venture agreement.

If submitting a proposal as a joint venture, the experience of each of the joint venture partners can be submitted for the joint venture entity. The experience of either joint venture partner will be considered the experience of the joint venture entity. Page and project form limits apply to the joint venture as a whole, i.e., a submission limitation of three (3) projects under the experience factor is not an allowance of three (3) projects for each of the joint venture partners. Prospective Offerors that submit proposals may not change their joint venture firms, if selected for award.

Subcontractors: If any portion of the work provided under Factor 3 is subcontracted, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of that subcontractor as it relates to work the subcontractor is performing. In accordance with the non-substitution clause in Section 00800, Paragraph 999.215-4001, Limitations on Substitutions for Certain Positions and/or Subcontractors, provide a letter of commitment using Attachment 2 for any subcontractor proposed to be used.

Prime contractor will not be allowed to substitute a subcontractor’s experience for its own; unless the subcontractor will be a team member in this requirement.

G. EVALUATION FACTORS

FACTOR ONE – PRICE

Submission Requirements

The Offeror’s volume for this factor shall be fully completed. Offeror completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP.

This volume will also include price and price related information:

• Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) and Section 00010A (Line Items and Pricing Schedule) Include the completed Standard Form 1442 for the RFP, along with the completed Pricing Schedule. The total cost for the construction will be considered for evaluation, including all options and alternates (if applicable).

• Section 00101, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of

Offerors.

• In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee (Original bid guarantee).

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-7 AMENDMENT 0004

• Attachment 4, ProposalData Sheet.

• Attachment 5, Determination of Responsibility.

• Proposal Format.

Evaluation Method:

Price is not rated. It will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). The price analysis will also check for the appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Additionally, Offerors’ price proposals may be evaluated for price realism to determine if there are proposals that are unrealistically low in terms of overall price or reflective of an inherent lack of management and/or technical competence or comprehension of the requirements.

Therefore, Offerors are advised that their business decision to submit a low-priced proposal can be considered in assessing their understanding or the risk associated with their proposal.

Prices will be reviewed for minor or clerical errors. If necessary, Offerors will be afforded an opportunity to resolve any such errors. Any exchange with Offerors under this subparagraph shall be for the purpose of clarification (FAR 15.306(a)) and shall not constitute negotiations as defined at FAR 15.306(d). In the event of discrepancy between a unit price and the extended amount, the unit price shall be controlling.

NON-PRICED FACTORS EVALUATION

All non-priced factors and sub-factors must receive an ACCEPTABLE to be considered for award.

Offeror shall provide for each non-priced factors and sub-factors three (3) civil construction projects. If the Offeror provides more than 3 civil construction projects, only the first 3 projects in sequential order will be evaluated. All other projects will not be evaluated.

Projects submitted must be completed or 80% physically completed within the last ten

(10) years from the date of this solicitation.

FACTOR 2: CORPORATE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Submission Requirements

Using Attachment 1, provide three (3) civil construction projects with a detailed narrative that explains how each provided corporate experience is similar to the work described in the solicitation. Failure to provide sufficient detail explaining how each provided experience is similar to the work described in the solicitation may cause evaluation Factor 2 to be rated Unacceptable. This narrative should demonstrate that

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-8 AMENDMENT 0004

the Offeror clearly has the capability to self-perform or manage the project successfully. Please note, in all likelihood, the technical evaluators are unfamiliar with the demonstrated experiences that Offerors provide; therefore, a lack of detail explaining the work and how it is similar to the work described in the solicitation may result in an Unacceptable rating for this factor.

Corporate Relevant Experiences provided shall include the location/conditions, duration, dollar value, any unusual coordination requirements as well as any problems encountered and corrective action taken to successfully complete the project. Each project identified must include a contract number, a current reference contact name, address and telephone number, as well as email address if available.

Any Corporate Relevant Experience provided under this Factor should also have a corresponding submission in the Past Performance Factor. If Past Performance information is not provided (Attachment 3 – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire) that Corporate Relevant Experience will not be evaluated.

Evaluation Method

This Factor will evaluate the Offeror (Acting as Prime) for its Corporate Experience in successful completion of civil construction projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

The Government will only review three (3) construction projects. Any projects submitted in excess of three (3) for Corporate Relevant Experience will not be considered.

FACTOR 3: SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL EXPIERIENCE

Using Attachment 1, provide three (3) civil construction projects that demonstrate experience performing the following sub-factors:

SUB-FACTOR A - Successfully construct earthen levee embankment within the last 10 years. A levee is defined as a man-made earthen structure designed and constructed in accordance with sound engineering practices to contain, control, or divert the flow of water so as to provide reasonable assurance of excluding temporary flooding from the leveed area.

SUB-FACTOR B – Successfully process limestone to meet gradation specifications within the last 10 years. Provide details on the gradation specifications for each specific listed project.

SUB-FACTOR C – Within the last 10 years, successfully construct a levee in a wet site with fluctuating water levels ranging between 0 and 2 feet, and foundation conditions consisting of highly permeable limestone or other

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-9 AMENDMENT 0004

materials of similar hydraulic conductivity characteristics, where unwatering/dewatering was needed.

NOTE: It is not necessary that all the sub-factors above be performed on the same project.

If any portion of the work provided as specialized technical experience was performed by the Parent Company and/or subsidiary of the Offeror, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of the Parent Company and /or Subsidiary as it relates to work the Parent Company and/or subsidiary will be performing on the requirements described herein. Using Attachment 2, provide a letter of commitment, as defined above, from the proposed Parent Company and/or subsidiary of the Offeror, if such company will be part of the Contractor’s team. The letter shall be on the Parent Company and/or subsidiary letterhead.

Any demonstrated experience (to include subcontractors) provided here for consideration in this factor, should also have a corresponding submission in the Past Performance factor. If Past Performance information is not provided for a demonstrated experience, that demonstrated experience will not be evaluated.

In accordance with the non-substitution clause in Section 00800 (999.215-4001), Limitations on Substitutions for Certain Positions and/or Subcontractors, a letter of commitment must be provided for any proposed major subcontractor.

Evaluation Method

The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the Offeror’s proposal will satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

The Government will only review three (3) construction projects. Any projects submitted in excess of three (3) for Specialized Technical Experience will not be considered.

FACTOR 2 AND FACTOR 3: DEFINITIONS

The Offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant experience on same or similar civil construction projects to that of the solicitation requirements using the Corporate/Specialized Relevant Technical Experience Form (Attachment 1).

Recent is defined as: Civil construction projects that are substantially complete (at least 80% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no later than ten (10) years preceding the date of the solicitation advertisement date.

Same or similar is defined as civil construction projects having the following:

Size: A project with a contract value of at least $5,000,000.00. All submitted project experience must meet the size requirement.

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-10 AMENDMENT 0004

Scope: A project requiring a similar level of activities and complexity.

Joint Venture: If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects must have been performed by the Joint Venture submitting the offer.

A major subcontractor is defined as any subcontractor that has been identified under Factor 3. Additionally, a major subcontractor can be identified as one that is crucial for the successful completion of the project.

A letter of commitment is defined as a letter from a major subcontractor on official Company letterhead (1) addressed to the prime contractor, (2) identifying the work they intend to perform, and (3) stating that they are willing to be bound to perform the identified work if the prime receives this contract. Failure to provide a letter of commitment from a proposed major subcontractor will cause any non-priced factor to be rated Unacceptable, if applicable.

FACTOR 4 PAST PERFORMANCE

Offerors shall submit one NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), (see Attachment 3), completed and signed by an Owner of the Project (Client) point of contact or “POC” for each of the projects submitted under Factors 2 and 3. If a project submitted under Factor 3 was completed by the Offeror’s major subcontractor, the Offeror is responsible for coordinating with their major subcontractor and submitting a completed NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire on their major subcontractor’s behalf. All pages of each NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire must be initialed and dated on the bottom right-hand corner by the POC.

Failure to provide a completed and signed NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire for each project as described above may cause Factors 2 and/or 3 to be rated Unacceptable. If a Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record is available for any of the projects submitted under Factors 2 and/or 3, the CCASS or CPARS record may be submitted in lieu of the completed Past Performance Questionnaire or an official Performance Evaluation from a non- Federal agency.

The Owner of the Project (Client) or “POC” is defined as the entity that took ownership of the project after construction was complete.

If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from the Owner of the Project (Client), before the proposal receipt date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the Questionnaire (Blocks 1-8) that contains contract and client information for the submitted project. Note: it is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the client’s point of contact information is current and correct. The client point of contact reflected in (Blocks 1-8) should also be familiar with the past performance they are being asked to verify and informed that they will be contacted by

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-11 AMENDMENT 0004

the Government to verify past performance.

The Government reserves the right to obtain copies of all CCASS or CPARS records contained in the CCASS or CPARS database for the Offeror or Offeror’s major subcontractors.

Evaluation Method:

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the Offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. All Past Performance Ratings must be equivalent to the US Army Corps of Engineers definition of “Satisfactory” or better to be considered, “Acceptable.”

Past performance shall be used as an evaluation factor within the LPTA process.

Therefore, past performance will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis.

Past performance should be initially evaluated to determine whether the Offeror’s present/past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired.

The past performance evaluation should determine how well the Offeror performed on the prior contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the Offeror performed those past contracts.

Offeror whose predominant (>50%) CPARS and PPQ rating are less than Satisfactory may be rated Unacceptable.

NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, shall be rated“acceptable.”

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 – Corporate/Specialized Relevant Technical Experience (The space provided may not be sufficient. If this is the case, Offerors are encouraged to provide additional information on supplemental pages attached to the collection sheet.)

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-12 AMENDMENT 0004

Attachment 2 – Letter of Commitment from Key Subcontractors

Attachment 3 – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire For Civil Construction Project

Attachment 4 – Proposal Data Sheet

Attachment 5 – Determination of Responsibility

Attachment 6 – Proposal Format

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-13 AMENDMENT 0004

ATTACHMENT 1

Corporate\Specialized Relevant Technical

Experience

Provide the following information to show examples of civil construction projects your company and/or its team members (i.e. major subcontractors) constructed within the last ten (10) years indicating experience with civil construction projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project. NOTE: Use additional pages as necessary to provide t h e information requested.

Type of Project Represented

Your Firm’s Name

Project Name and Contract Number, Location of Project and Conditions, Owner, General Scope, Width and Depth of Drilled Shafts.

Describe how this project is relevant and similar to the elements of the solicited Central and Southern Florida Project for Flood Control and Other Purposes, C-111, Detention Area and Other Features (Contract 8A). Use additional pages as necessary to provide this information, and to address all required elements of the sub-element/sub-factors.

Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self- Performed: Construction Cost:

Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out

Dates Construction: Began Completed

Your Performance Evaluation by Owner and Awards and Recognitions (if any)

Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages? (If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation) Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company) Current Telephone Number and email address of Owner Reference

Any unusual conditions/requirements

Problems encountered and corrective action taken to successfully complete the project

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-14 AMENDMENT 0004

ATTACHMENT 2

LETTER OF COMMITMENT OF KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (USE

SUBCONTRACTOR’S COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Name of Offeror

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Offeror), that (insert name of subcontractor firm, not …. Individual) will fulfill the duties of (state specific items of work to be performed on this project)

Sincerely, (Authorized Subcontractor Official) Date:

ATTACHMENT 3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CIVIL CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION

d. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

ComplexityofWork High Med Routine Howis this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions,etc.)

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-15 AMENDMENT 0004

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-16 AMENDMENT 0004

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-17 AMENDMENT 0004

PLEASE PROVIDE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR ’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-18 AMENDMENT 0004

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-19 AMENDMENT 0004

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

END OF QUESTIONNAIRE

Legend:

E – Excellent VG – Very Good S – Satisfactory M – Marginal U – Unacceptable N – Not Applicable

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-20 AMENDMENT 0004

ATTACHMENT 4

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

Solicitation W912EP-16-R-0027 Name of Firm:

Address:

Phone:

E-mail:

DUNS # (used for accessing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Also provide any other assigned number that identifies the member firm(s) Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System CCASS/CPARS databases. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must also be submitted. If the firm is a joint venture, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association. Provide DUNS for each.

Provide DUNS for any firm identified as a major subcontractor for which demonstrated experience has been submitted under Factor 3. Also, list the firm and briefly describe the nature of the association.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Firm 3:

Nature of Association:

AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

[List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.]

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-21 AMENDMENT 0004

ATTACHMENT 5

DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY

The following information is provided to assist the contracting officer in determining whether or not the proposed contractor meets the general standards of responsibility enumerated at FAR 9.104-1, DFARS 209.104-1, and FAR 9.104-1 General Standards. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must --

(a) HAVE ADEQUATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE CONTRACT, OR THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN THEM (SEE 9.104-3(b))

Banking References

Provide letters from the banking references to confirm this information.

*1st bank's name:

Telephone #:

Address:

Person:

Title:

Length of time with bank:

Credit Rating:

Number/type of accounts:

Amount in each account (# of figures):

Credit line: Secured/Unsecured Outstanding loans: Secured/Unsecured Comments:

*2nd bank's name:

Telephone #:

Address:

Person:

Title:

Length of time with bank:

Credit Rating:

Number/type of accounts:

Amount in each account (# of figures):

Credit line: Secured/Unsecured Outstanding loans: Secured/Unsecured Comments:

*** Provide letters from the banking references to confirm this information.

W 912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-22 AMENDMENT 0004

(b) HAVE A SATISFACTORY RECORD OF INTEGRITY AND BUSINESS ETHICS

Trade References

*1st company:

Telephone #:

Address:

Name:

Title:

Length of time with company:

Credit line:

Average monthly business:

High credit:

Payment history:

Takes discounts:

Comments:

*2nd Company:

Telephone #:

Address:

Name:

Title:

Length of time with company:

Credit line:

Average monthly business:

High credit:

Payment history:

Takes discounts:

Comments:

Workman's Compensation Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

2013: 2014: 2015:

(e) HAVE THE NECESSARY PRODUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND TECHNICAL

EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, OR THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN THEM (SEE 9.104-

3(b))

(f) BE OTHERWISE QUALIFIED AND ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE AN AWARD UNDER

APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

W912EP-16-R-0027 00100A-23 AMENDMENT 0004

ATTACHMENT 6

PROPOSAL FORMAT

PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO SOLICITATION NO:

W912EP-16-R-0027

OFFEROR’S NAME: [Offeror enter]

OFFEROR’S ADDRESS: [Offeror enter]

OFFEROR’S POINT OF CONTACT (POC): [Offeror enter]

POC’s TELEPHONE: [Offeror enter] POC’s

FAX: [Offeror enter]

POC’s EMAIL: [Offeror enter]

THIS OFFER IS SUBMITTED IN SEPARATE VOLUMES AS FOLLOWS: [Offeror check each applicable item and enter NA for non-applicable items.]

Volume One (Price) is submitted in 1 Original and 1 Copy.

Volume Two (Corporate Relevant Experience) is submitted in 1 Original and 5 Copies. There is no pricing information in this package.

Volume Three (Specialized Technical Experience) is submitted in 1 Original and 5 Copies. There is no pricing information in this package.

Volume Four (Past Performance) is submitted in 1 Original and 1 Copy.

There is no pricing information in this package.