W912EP-16-R-0019_Amendment_0016.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04 EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

DREDGE MATERIAL MANAGEMENT AREA O-7, OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA

A. SEE CONTINUATION SHEET FOR AMENDMENT DETAILS.

B. THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE REMAINS UNCHANGED @ OCTOBER 21, 2016 @ 2:00 P.M. EST.

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 24

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15C. DATE SIGNED 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer) (Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912EP-16-R-0019

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-May-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Oct-2016

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, JACKSONVILLE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

701 SAN MARCO BLVD

JACKSONVILLE FL 32207-8175

W912EP 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODE CODE

EMAIL: TEL:

X

W912EP-16-R-0019 1 Amendment 0016

SF 30 CONTINUATION SHEET

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. SPECIFICATIONS:

A. The text changes have been updated with additions noted with red text and deletions noted with line/crossouts, and pertain only to changes made by this amendment.

CHANGES TO THE SPECIFICATIONS – Volume 1 of 2:

DELETE Section 00100A in its entirety and REPLACE with the attached revised Section 00100A.

Changes are only made to pages 00100A-1 and 00100A-3 and Attachment 1.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-1 Amendment 0016

SECTION 00100A

SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

Subject to the provisions contained herein, award will be made to one (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR; who conforms to the solicitation requirements; provides the lowest evaluated price and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, meets the technically acceptable standard for the non-price factors. Prices will be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(a). To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than "Acceptable" must be achieved for all non-priced factors/subfactors.

B. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY: Technical Acceptability consists of Sub-factor 1 Demonstrated Experience.

Sub-Factor 1 – Demonstrated Experience

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 3 – PRICE: The Price factor is not rated.

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals will be evaluated on a technically acceptable source selection basis. Each proposal will be evaluated, based on the non-cost factors defined above, and deemed technically acceptable or not technically acceptable. Prices will then be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.402(a). Award will be made to the Offeror who submits the lowest priced proposal that is determined to be technically acceptable.

By submitting an offer in response to this solicitation, Offerors are agreeing to comply with all terms and conditions contained in the solicitation. Unless the solicitation specifically invites the Offeror to submit exceptions, the Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer may reject any offer that contains exceptions and/or qualification. In this solicitation, the words “offer” and “proposal” are used interchangeably. (See definition of “offer” at FAR 2.101.) Except for any portions of the Offeror’s proposal incorporated into the resulting contract by specific reference, the terms and conditions included in the solicitation, including any amendments, shall take precedence over the Offeror’s proposal.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-2 Amendment 0016

Proposal Evaluation

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Source Selection Authority later determines them to be necessary. Further, if the Source Selection Authority determines that discussions are necessary and if the Source Selection Authority determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Source Selection Authority may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

D. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

The offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying digital copy, see Paragraph 999.215-4003, Section 00100. The RFP shall provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal.

The proposal shall be divided into volumes as indicated below. Each set of volumes shall be submitted sealed separately. Each volume shall be marked with the offeror’s name, the solicitation number, the volume number and stamped with “Original” or “Copy.”

Each respective original or copy shall be separately bound or placed in a three- ring binder.

All proposals shall contain the evaluation requirements stated herein and every binder shall also contain: Table of Contents, List of Tables (if required), List of Figures (if required), List of Appendices, and Name/Address/Telephone Number/e-mail address of the Offeror. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. No material (information not part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. The offeror shall submit in the proposal the requested information specified herein.

*In accordance with Paragraph 999.215-4003 - Electronic Proposals, Section 00100, submit one electronic copy that contains both volumes (Technical Acceptability and Price).

FACTOR 1 (VOLUME ONE) – Technical Acceptability Package (1 Original, 2 Copies)

Sub-Factor 1 Demonstrated Experience

DO NOT INCLUDE PRICING INFORMATION IN THE TECHNICAL MERIT

PROPOSAL.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-3 Amendment 0016

FACTOR 2 (VOLUME ONE) – PAST PERFORMANCE (1 Original, 1 Copy)

FACTOR 3 (VOLUME TWO) – Price and Price Related Information (1 Original, 1 Copy)

FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

In responding to this factor, the objective should be to instill confidence that the offeror thoroughly understands the requirements and complexities of this project, has the knowledge, expertise, equipment, and experience required to meet or exceed the terms and conditions of these specifications, and the ability to successfully accomplish and complete the project within the required time frame specified in the solicitation.

In accordance with the non-substitution clause in Section 00800 (999.215-4001), Limitations on Substitutions for Certain Positions and/or Subcontractors, a letter of commitment must be provided for any proposed major subcontractor and key personnel.

A major subcontractor is defined as any subcontractor that is crucial for the successful completion of the project.

A letter of commitment is defined as a letter from the subcontractor on official Company letterhead (1) addressed to the prime contractor, (2) identifying the work they intend to perform, and (3) stating that they are willing to be bound to perform the identified work if the prime receives this contract.

Failure to provide a letter of commitment, as defined above, from a proposed major subcontractor will deem the proposal not technically acceptable.

Sub-factor 1 – Demonstrated Experience

Submission Requirements

Provide two (2) examples of projects completed or at least 70% physically completed within the last six (6) years (measured from the date of this solicitation) which demonstrate that the Offeror and its team members' (i.e. major subcontractors) have experience in performing work on Dredged Material Management Areas (DMMA’s), earthen dike construction or large scale earthen compacted embankments.

A completed project is defined as work performed under a “project” that is physically complete and has been accepted by the customer.

Any demonstrated experience (to include subcontractors) provided here for consideration in this sub-factor, should also have a corresponding submission in the Past Performance factor. If Past Performance information is not provided (Attachment 3 – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire) that demonstrated experience will not be evaluated and will render Sub-factor 1 not technically acceptable.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-4 Amendment 0016

Using Attachment 1, provide a detailed narrative that explains how each provided demonstrated experience is similar to the work described in the solicitation. Additional pages may be used as necessary to provide required detail. This narrative should demonstrate that the offeror clearly has the capability to successfully complete the project.

Demonstrated experiences provided should include the location/conditions, duration, dollar value, any unusual coordination requirements as well as any problems encountered and corrective action taken to successfully complete the project. Each project identified must include a contract number, a current reference contact name, address and telephone number, as well as email address if available.

If any portion of the work provided as demonstrated experience is subcontracted, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of that subcontractor as it relates to work the subcontractor is performing. In accordance with the non-substitution clause in Section 00800, Paragraph 999.215-4001, Limitations on Substitutions for Certain Positions and/or Subcontractors, provide a letter of commitment using Attachment 2 for any subcontractor for whom demonstrated experience is provided.

A letter of commitment is defined under Factor 1. Failure to provide a letter of commitment from a proposed major subcontractor will render the proposal technically unacceptable.

Any demonstrated experience (to include subcontractors) provided here for consideration in this sub-factor, should also have a corresponding submission in the Past Performance factor. If Past Performance information is not provided for a demonstrated experience, that demonstrated experience will not be evaluated.

Evaluation Method In responding to this sub-factor, the objective should be to instill confidence that the Offeror thoroughly understands the requirements and complexities of this project, has the knowledge, expertise, and experience required to successfully construct a Dredged Material Management Area (DMMA). The Offer must provide two (2) separate projects completed in the last six (6) years as described above to be considered technically acceptable.

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Submission Requirements

Offerors shall submit one NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (see Attachment 3), completed and signed by an Owner of the Project (Client) point of contact or “POC” for each of the projects submitted under sub-factor 1 – Demonstrated Experience. If a project submitted under sub-factor 1 was completed by the offeror’s major subcontractor, the offeror is responsible for coordinating with their major

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-5 Amendment 0016 subcontractor and submitting a completed NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire on their major subcontractor’s behalf. All pages of each NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire must be initialed and dated on the bottom right-hand corner by the POC. If a Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record is available for any of the projects submitted under Sub-factor 1-Demonstrated Experience, the CCASS or CPARS record may be submitted in lieu of the completed Past Performance Questionnaire or an official Performance Evaluation from the owner.

The Owner of the Project (Client) or “POC” is defined as the entity that took ownership of the project after construction was complete.

If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed Past Performance Questionnaire from the Owner of the Project (Client), before the proposal receipt date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the Questionnaire (Blocks 1-8) that contains contract and client information for the submitted project. Note: it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the client’s point of contact information is current and correct.

The client point of contact reflected in (Blocks 1-8) should also be familiar with the past performance they are being asked to verify and informed that they will be contacted by the Government to verify past performance.

The Government reserves the right to obtain copies of all CCASS or CPARS records contained in the CCASS or CPARS database for the offeror or offeror’s major subcontractors.

For each past performance submitted, explain why it is relevant to this project, this discussion should include a summary of the project description provided in the respective demonstrated experience submitted for Factor 1. Offerors should provide a narrative and be as specific as possible when explaining how a past performance is relevant to this project.

The following are examples of topics that should be discussed at a minimum:

timeliness, environmental issues, responsiveness to customer needs, quality control, cost control, change order work and compliance with safety requirements. Emphasis should be made on quality, customer satisfaction and the resolution of problems encountered during performance.

Evaluation Method

The evaluation of past performance will examine how well Offerors have performed on

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-6 Amendment 0016 previous projects considering such criteria as quality, timeliness, safety, responsiveness to customer concerns, and adherence to budget. All Past Performance Ratings must be equivalent to the U S Army Corps of Engineers definition of “Satisfactory” or better to be considered acceptable.

A Satisfactory Rating is defined as: “Quality of final work is acceptable in an overall sense; however, it may have been necessary to get the firm to correct some unacceptable work.”

FACTOR 3 – PRICE AND PRICE RELATED INFORMATION

Submission Requirements

The offeror shall submit the following price and price related information:

a. Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) and Section 00010A (Line Items and Pricing Schedule) Include the completed Standard Form 1442 for the RFP, along with the completed Pricing Schedule. The total cost for the construction will be considered for evaluation, including all options and alternates (if applicable).

b. Section 00101, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, an original bid guarantee shall be submitted with each offer.

c. Proposal Data Sheet (Attachment 4)

d. Responsibility Determination (Attachment 5)

e. Joint Venture Agreement (If applicable)

Evaluation Method

Complete Attachment 4 Proposal Data Sheet. The proposal data sheet is not considered for evaluation but is required as part of the Offeror’s proposal.

After resolution of minor or clerical errors and/or mistakes, the Contracting Officer will perform a price analysis on all proposals received. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), to determine fairness and reasonableness and the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the proposal. The price analysis will also check for the appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Additionally, offerors’ price proposals maybe evaluated for price realism to determine if there are proposals that are unrealistic low in terms of overall price or reflective of an inherent lack of management and/or technical competence or comprehension of the requirements.

Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Fairness, Reasonableness, and Realism will

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-7 Amendment 0016 be established using historical price information, price competition information, the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), and any other pricing tools necessary.

Submittal of Section 00101 is not considered for evaluation, but is required as part of the offeror’s proposal of this solicitation. The information requested in this Section needs to be fully completed along with completion of Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) per FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS. The submitted information will be reviewed for completeness by Contracting Personnel.

Bid bonds will be reviewed for acceptability. Any offeror whose bid bond is unacceptable, will be eliminated without further consideration unless the Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer later determines that discussions are necessary and decides that the offeror’s proposal should be included in the competitive range.

Use Attachment 5 to provide the information required for the Responsibility Determination.

In addition to other proposal information, the Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR Part 9.

E. Other General Review

System for Award Management

Offerors will be checked against the System for Award Management (SAM) system. Any offeror who is listed with any active exclusion will be eliminated without further consideration.

Minor Informalities

Proposals will be checked for minor informalities or irregularities. The Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer will follow guidance at FAR 14.405 when resolving minor informalities or irregularities. The Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer either will give the offeror an opportunity to cure any defect resulting from a minor informality or irregularity or waive the defect, whichever is to the advantage of the Government.

Joint Venture

Contractors submitting an offer as a joint venture must provide a written copy of the joint venture agreement with the initial proposal. The joint venture agreement must be signed by both parties and will be subject to review by Office of Counsel. The joint venture must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov as a joint venture in order for an award to be made. In addition, the SF 1442 as well as all future documents (task orders, bonds, etc.) must be signed by both parties.

http://www.sam.gov/

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-8 Amendment 0016

Offerors are reminded that if it is an 8(a) or HUBZone joint venture, it shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Parts 124 and 126.

Price Analysis

Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. The Contracting Officer will conduct the price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). The price analysis will also check for the appearance of unbalanced line item prices.

Prices will be reviewed for minor or clerical errors. If necessary, offerors will be afforded an opportunity to resolve any such errors. Any exchange with offerors under this subparagraph shall be for the purpose of clarification (FAR 15.306(a)) and shall not constitute negotiations as defined at FAR 15.306(d). In the event of discrepancy between a unit price and the extended amount, the unit price shall be controlling.

Prices will be reviewed for apparent mistakes. Should this review reveal any prices that seem unreasonably low, the Contracting Officer will contact the offeror and ask the offeror to confirm the questioned price. If the offeror confirms the price, no further action will be taken under this subparagraph. If, however, the offeror alleges a mistake, the offeror may modify the proposal in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(6). Any modification submitted for the purpose of correcting a mistake shall include documentation explaining how the mistake was made.

After resolution of minor or clerical errors and/or mistakes, prices will be reviewed for reasonableness, unbalanced pricing, or any other price related issue that could pose an unacceptable risk to the Government or indicate the offeror does not clearly understand the requirement at hand in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 (b). Therefore, offerors are advised that their business decision to submit a low-priced proposal can be considered in assessing their understanding or the risk associated with their proposal.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-9 Amendment 0016

F. ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 - Demonstrated Experience

Attachment 2- Letter of Commitment from Key Subcontractor

Attachment 3 - NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment 4- Proposal Data Sheet

Attachment 5- Determination of Responsibility

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-10 Amendment 0016

ATTACHMENT 1

DEMONSTRATED EXPERIENCE

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company and/or its team members (ie major subcontractors) constructed within the last five (5) six (6) years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project. NOTE: Use additional pages as necessary to provide the information requested.

1. Type of Project Represented

2. Your Firm’s Name

3. Project Name and Contract Number Location of Project and Conditions Owner General Scope of Construction Project

4. Describe how this project is relevant and similar to the elements of the solicited (Okeechobee Waterway Florida Dredge Material Management Area O-7 Martin County, Florida). Use additional pages as necessary to provide this information, and to address all required elements of the sub-element/sub-factors.

5. Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self- Performed:

6. Construction Cost:

7. Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out

8. Dates Construction: Began Completed

9. Your Performance Evaluation by Owner and Awards and Recognitions (if any)

10. Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages? (If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

11. Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company), Current Telephone Number and email address of Owner Reference.

12. Any unusual conditions/requirements.

13. Problems encountered and corrective action taken to successfully complete the project.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-11 Amendment 0016

ATTACHMENT 2

LETTER OF COMMITMENT OF KEY SUBCONTRACTOR

(USE SUBCONTRACTOR’S COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Name of Offeror

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Offeror), that (insert name of subcontractor firm) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project)

Sincerely, (Authorized Subcontractor Official) Date: __________

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-12 Amendment 0016

ATTACHMENT 3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture

Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-13 Amendment 0016

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-14 Amendment 0016

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

THE EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-15 Amendment 0016

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-16 Amendment 0016

PLEASE PROVIDE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-17 Amendment 0016

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-18 Amendment 0016

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

END OF QUESTIONNAIRE

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-19 Amendment 0016

ATTACHMENT 4

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

Solicitation No. W912EP-16-R-0019

Name of Firm:

Address:

Phone:

E-mail:

DUNS # (used for accessing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Also provide any other assigned number that identifies the member firm(s) Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System CCASS/CPARS databases. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must also be submitted. If the firm is a joint venture, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association. Provide DUNS for each.

Provide DUNS for any firm identified as a major subcontractor for which demonstrated experience has been submitted under Factor 1. Also, list the firm and briefly describe the nature of the association.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Firm 3:

Nature of Association:

AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

[List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.]

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-20 Amendment 0016

ATTACHMENT 5

DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY

The following information is provided to assist the contracting officer in determining whether or not the proposed contractor meets the general standards of responsibility enumerated at FAR 9.104-1, DFARS 209.104-1, and FAR 9.104-1 General Standards. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must --

(a) HAVE ADEQUATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE CONTRACT, OR THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN THEM (SEE 9.104-3(b))

Banking References

Provide letters from the banking references to confirm this information.

*1st bank's name: ______________________________________________ Telephone #: __________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________ Person: _______________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________ Length of time with bank: _____________________________________ Credit Rating: ________________________________________________ Number/type of accounts: ______________________________________ Amount in each account (# of figures): ________________________ Credit line: ______________________ Secured/Unsecured Outstanding loans: _______________________ Secured/Unsecured Comments:

*2nd bank's name: ______________________________________________ Telephone #: __________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________ Person: _______________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________ Length of time with bank: _____________________________________ Credit Rating: ________________________________________________ Number/type of accounts: ______________________________________ Amount in each account (# of figures): ________________________ Credit line: ______________________ Secured/Unsecured Outstanding loans: _______________________ Secured/Unsecured Comments:

*** Provide letters from the banking references to confirm this information.

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-21 Amendment 0016

(b) HAVE A SATISFACTORY RECORD OF INTEGRITY AND BUSINESS ETHICS

Trade References

*1st company: ___________________________________________________ Telephone #: __________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________ Name: _________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________ Length of time with company: __________________________________ Credit line: __________________________________________________ Average monthly business: _____________________________________ High credit: __________________________________________________ Payment history: ______________________________________________ Takes discounts: ______________________________________________ Comments: _____________________________________________________

*2nd Company: ___________________________________________________ Telephone #: __________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________ Name: _________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________ Length of time with company: __________________________________ Credit line: __________________________________________________ Average monthly business: _____________________________________ High credit: __________________________________________________ Payment history: ______________________________________________ Takes discounts: ______________________________________________ Comments: _____________________________________________________

W912EP-16-R-0019 Section 00100A-22 Amendment 0016

(PRODUCED OR SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE PROSPECTIVE

CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS) (SEE 9.104-3(b))

*Workman's Compensation Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

2013:_____ 2014:_____2015:_____