W912EK24R0019 Contractor Questions and Answers_FINAL_22May24.pdf

W912EK24R0019 Facilitated Partnering Session for Southwest Coastal Louisiana Nonstructural Coastal Storm Risk Management Project Ques�ons and Answers

Contractor Ques�on Government Answers 1 Clarifica�on on "Relevant Experience" Scope:

a. Could the USACE please clarify if experience with similar-scale projects ($100M+ and spanning 1+ year) facilitated for other government entities such as the State of Texas or GSA would be considered relevant under this solicitation? Our firm has extensive experience facilitating large-scale workshop projects with these entities, which we believe aligns closely with the objectives of USACE Civil Works projects.

2 Inclusion of Comparable Private Sector Experience:

a. Would the USACE consider relevant experience from large-scale civil works projects undertaken in collaboration with leading global construction and engineering firms such as AECOM and Fluor, or major private sector clients like Amazon/AWS? Our firm’s role in these projects involved complexities and stakeholder engagement similar to those expected in USACE Civil Works projects.

3 Defini�on of "Leading Facilitated Partnering":

a. Could the USACE provide further details on what specific aspects of "leading facilitated partnering" are critical for this qualification?

It would be helpful to understand whether aspects such as stakeholder coordination, project management, or specific technical competencies are emphasized.

4 Experience Versa�lity:

a. In cases where our firm has led multiple projects nearing the $100 million mark but not exceeding it, would a cumulative presentation of such projects be considered as meeting the experience threshold? This approach would demonstrate breadth and

This project requires experience in USACE Civil Works projects.

No.

The Southwest Coastal Louisiana Nonstructural Coastal Storm Risk Management Project is an extremely large and complex project with many interdependent agencies working together to reach a common goal. For a project of this scope and magnitude, USACE is requiring a facilitator that understands the intricacies of a USACE Civil Works project.

No.

depth of experience across various similarly scaled projects.

5 Subs�tu�on of Project Dura�on and Scale with Other

Metrics:

a. Would the USACE consider project complexity and impact as alternative metrics to the dollar value and duration? Our firm has facilitated highly complex projects that, although shorter in duration or slightly lower in budget, required high levels of expertise, coordination, and innovation which are directly applicable to USACE projects.

6 Verifica�on Process for Experience:

a. Could the USACE specify the verification process for the experience provided?

Understanding whether there is a preference for governmental vs. private sector verifications might help us better prepare our submission.

7 Addi�onal Contribu�ons to Project Success:

a. Would the USACE be interested in case studies or detailed project breakdowns that not only illustrate our compliance with the stated experience requirement but also highlight our contributions to exceeding project goals in terms of sustainability, efficiency, or innovation?

8 Recogni�on of Industry Leadership and Research Experience:

a. As a small business with proven leadership in industry-wide initiatives, including significant research and facilitation roles with the Construction Industry Institute (CII), could the USACE clarify if such specialized experience is considered relevant under this solicitation? Our engagement with CII has equipped us with cutting-edge practices and leadership skills in managing complex construction projects.

USACE will contact Contractor provided POC's directly for verification of experience.

No.

It is not considered relevant.

9 Broadened Defini�on of Relevant Experience:

a. Would the USACE consider experiences in research and development projects led in collaboration with institutions like the CII as relevant experience? Our work with CII has involved groundbreaking research and effective leadership facilitation, aligning closely with the innovative and strategic demands of USACE Civil Works projects.

10 Value of Research and Development Experience for Small Businesses:

a. Could the USACE provide insights into how our research contributions and development of new methodologies with the CII might be valued in this solicitation? This experience underscores our ability as a small business to lead projects that push technological and methodological boundaries, similar to those expected in USACE projects.

11 Leadership Facilita�on in Technical and Managerial Capaci�es:

a. In our roles facilitating multi-stakeholder initiatives with the CII, we have honed our skills in project management and technical leadership. How might this specialized experience support our qualifications for the USACE project, particularly in terms of leading facilitated partnering?

12 CII Partnership as a Metric of Experience Quality:

a. Considering our leadership and research roles with the CII, could the USACE detail if partnerships with recognized industry institutes enhance our standing in the evaluation process? Our proactive contributions to industry standards and practices demonstrate our commitment to excellence and innovation.

The Southwest Coastal Louisiana Nonstructural Coastal Storm Risk Management Project is an extremely large and complex project with many interdependent agencies working together to reach a common goal. For a project of this scope and magnitude, USACE is requiring a facilitator that understands the intricacies of a USACE Civil Works project.

13 Verifica�on of Experience through Industry Recognized Bodies:

a. Could the USACE confirm if endorsements or testimonials from reputable industry bodies like the CII, verifying our project leadership and research contributions, would be beneficial for our application? This recognition could illustrate our capability and impact in the sector.

14 Workshop Loca�on Clarifica�on:

a. Could you please confirm the specific loca�ons where the facilitated partnering workshops will be held? As the solicita�on men�ons mul�ple sessions over different periods, understanding the geographic loca�ons would help in our planning and logis�cs.

15 Workshop Schedule Details:

a. Could you provide more detailed informa�on regarding the �ming and frequency of the pre-partnering sessions, the facilitated 1-day mee�ngs, and the post-partnering session deliverables? Knowing the exact dates or periods when these sessions are expected to occur would greatly assist in aligning our resources effec�vely.

16 Number of Workshops and Dura�on:

a. Based on the solicita�on, there are mul�ple sessions planned across several op�on periods. Could you specify how many workshops are an�cipated in each op�on period and the expected dura�on of each workshop? This informa�on will be crucial for us to allocate the right personnel and resources.

No.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Reference Scope of Work Section 1.2.2(g).

Other pre and post partnering sessions are virtual. Reference Scope of Work Sections 1.2.1(g) and 1.2.3(c).

This is dependent upon when the contract is awarded. The agencies involved will determine a mutually agreed upon date and coordinate with the Awardee.

Reference Scope of Work Section 2.1.