Amendment_0004_Bid_Inquiry_&_Responses.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: LD15 Downstream Guidewall Repair Review: LD15 Downstream Guidewall Repair (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 43 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 7071982 Contracting G-004 Note 7 N/A Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Note 7 on General Note Sheet G-004 states "The available soil boring logs are included in the reference drawings."

Please provide reference drawings.

On: Jul 20 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forth coming to issue reference materials. On: Jul 25 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7073175 Contracting S101, S102 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Corps please provide an approximate length of the wood piles that were installed as part of the existing Guidewall?

On: Jul 20 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forth coming to issue reference materials. On: Jul 25 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7073987 Contracting 00 73 05 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Solicitation states the Contract is for 730 consecutive calendar days. Spec section 00 73 05 Special Contract Requirements paragraph 1.3.2 Construction Closure Period states the second closure period is Dec 2019 - Mar 2020.

If notice to proceed is issued in 2017, there is not enough contract time allowed in the Solicitation. Please advise.

On: Jul 21 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forth coming to issue reference materials. On: Jul 25 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075089 Contracting 030505 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the plans for the existing guidewall be made available to the bidders?

On: Jul 21 2017.

Government Response. . No On: Jul 25 2017 Government Response. . The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

An amendment will be forth coming to issue reference materials. On: Jul 26 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075099 Contracting 012200 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the USACE take off of quantities be made available to the bidders for reference?

Page 1 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

8/24/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

On: Jul 21 2017.

Government Response. . No On: Jul 25 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075124 Contracting V-103 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is there hydrographic survey data for the river side and land side of the guidewall available for the bidders to review?

On: Jul 21 2017.

Government Response. . No hydrographic survey data exists for the land side of the guidewall. See Attachment A, Section 03 05 05 - Concrete Removal, within the specifications for the river side, survey cross sections of the existing foundation. On: Jul 25 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7080614 Contracting S-103 and S-303 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide all available information relative to previous demolition work performed on Monoliths 30-33, including what methods were utilized to break existing concrete, the methods used to remove broken concrete from the project, and the dates this work was commenced and completed.

On: Jul 26 2017.

Government Response. . USACE work crews removed four existing monoliths, 30 through 33, over the weekend of May 21st 2017. High flood waters at this time allowed a work barge to be floated in behind the guidewall on the landside. Two excavators with hammer heads were used to demolish the existing monoliths down to elevation 552.1 as indicated within the plans. A second work barge had a crane with a clam shell to pick up concrete debris and place on an adjoining barge for disposal off site. A third excavator with a bucket head supported the clam shell with concrete debris clean up. Reference Picture set A, posted to Federal Business Opportunities. On: Jul 27 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7081195 Contracting 00 73 05 1.3.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is it necessary to maintain access for lock operation personnel or barge tow personnel on the lower guidewall monoliths below 22 in order to not disrupt lock operations during non construction closure periods?

On: Jul 26 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, see paragraph c. of Section 00 73 05, 1.3.1. Navigation operators and lock personnel continue to utilize the existing guidewall below Monolith 22. The usage of the guidewall monoliths below Monolith 22 will need to continue during the navigation seasons outside of the winter closure periods throughout the duration of the construction contract. This includes navigation operators and lock personnel utilizing the first group of 6 restored monoliths (23 through 28) when the lock opens back up to navigation on March 5th 2019. Construction work leading up to the designated closure periods will need to accommodate access and maintain integrity of both existing and new guidewall monoliths during the navigation seasons. On: Jul 27 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7081215 Contracting 00 73 05 1.3.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the contractor perform work listed to be performed during the closures periods outside of closure periods if it can be performed with out disrupting the operations of the lock and dam?

On: Jul 26 2017.

Government Response. . Contractor must comply with identified sequence requirements as stated within 00 73 05, 1.3.2. Navigation operators and lock personnel continue to depend on the integrity of the existing guidewall in order to tie-off to check posts on the guidewall below Monolith 22. On: Jul 27 2017

Page 2 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7081221 Contracting S101 - 102, S301 31 32 23 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is the entire crib below the existing concrete to be grouted? Has the USACE taken any cores through the crib?

On: Jul 26 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, the entire existing crib below the existing concrete is to be grouted for monoliths 23 through 34. The extents are defined by dimensions and details provided on drawing sheets S101-102, and S301. Specification Section 31 32 23, defines grout placement performance. Full grouting of the cribs is required to facilitate shaft drilling and to help stabilize the foundation during construction activities. New monoliths once completed will not depend on the existing crib cells for support or design loads.

No exploratory cores were taken through the existing crib. It should be anticipated that river sediment will be present within the cells. On: Jul 27 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7083311 Contracting S-301 A1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does detail A1 on plan sheet S-301, in particular the portion of the detail showing riprap and bedding stone river ward of the crib wall, reflect approximate existing conditions through the length of the work area?

On: Jul 27 2017.

Government Response. . Detail A1 on plan sheet S-301 shows the riprap and bedding stone river ward of the crib wall in original as-built condition. There is siltation on top of the riprap. Hydrographic survey information is available at: http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/Missions/Navigation/Hydrographic- Surveys/Mississippi-River/RM_474483_Lock_15_Lower/FileId/108652/ On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7083321 Contracting S-301 and S-304 A1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Was existing riprap on the riverside of the crib wall removed when Monoliths 30-33 were partially demolished?

On: Jul 27 2017.

Government Response. . No, the condition is the same is as Detail A1 on plan sheet S-301 which shows the riprap and bedding stone river ward of the crib wall in original as-built condition. There is siltation on top of the riprap. Hydrographic survey information is available at:

http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/Missions/Navigation/Hydrographic-Surveys/Mississippi- River/RM_474483_Lock_15_Lower/FileId/108652/ On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7083329 Contracting S-303 and S-304 A1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is it permissible to remove existing monolith concrete beyond the limits shown on Sheets S-303 and S-304 as long as it is replaced with new concrete at no additional cost to the Government?

On: Jul 27 2017.

Government Response. . yes On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7084950 Contracting Section 00 73 05 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 3 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Construction expected to be performed outside of closure periods includes crib wall grouting and installing of the southerly line of drilled shafts. Completing these items requires various drills, support equipment, and material supply access to the land side of the guidewall. Providing access for these operations necessitates constructing a work pad suitable to support the equipment. That work pad is expected to be constructed of a significant quantity of aggregate or rip rap material. Is it permissible to leave this stone material in place upon completion of the guidewall and simply cover it with the borrow material necessary to complete the embankment behind the land side of the guide wall?

On: Jul 28 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, at no additional cost to the Government On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7085019 Contracting S201 - S203 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the drilled shafts be cased full length from the top of the shaft to the top of bed rock?

On: Jul 28 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, at no additional cost to the Government. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7085913 Contracting S201-S203 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is bedrock the limestone layer or shale layer shown in the reference drawings?

On: Jul 28 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, an amendment will be forth coming to issue reference materials. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7087139 Contracting S-308, S-311 Section C3 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What part of the drilled shaft is to have a 2'-10" bore hole? Is it through the guidewall and crib, to the bottom of the casing, or to the top of bedrock?

On: Jul 31 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming to clarify. The 2'-10" bore hole is through the guidewall and crib. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7089035 Contracting 03 05 05 - 3.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The general requirements for concrete removal states that all horizontal and vertical edges shall be saw cut to full depth for concrete removal. Is this requirement still hold true if concrete is demolished via breaker or blasting to the minimum demolition lines as these methods would likely leave an acceptable surface amplitude for new concrete placement?

On: Aug 01 2017.

Government Response. . See saw cut annotation on S-303 and General Structural Note 5 on S-001 On:

Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7089044 Contracting 03 31 00 - 3.2.1.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 4 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Can the contractor exceed the 7.5 foot maximum lift requirement if they can present data and calculations showing adequate temperature control during and after mass concrete placements?

On: Aug 01 2017.

Government Response. . No On: Aug 04 2017 Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

Bid this work according to the contract documents. On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7089153 Contracting 03 31 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government be open to the use of precast for the proposed new monoliths instead of CIP Concrete?

On: Aug 01 2017.

Government Response. . no On: Aug 04 2017 Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

Bid this work according to the contract documents. On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7092822 Contracting 00 73 05 1.3, 1.30 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the contractor be able to lock through during closure periods?

On: Aug 03 2017.

Government Response. . Lock personnel will need 24 hours notice to have time to break ice and make sure all the components work. The Government Bridge will need notice as well to swing the bridge refer to 00 73 05 1.3.3. The lockage would have to be between 0800-1600. On: Aug 10 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7092836 Contracting 00 73 05 1.3.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the contractor be allowed to drill the river side shafts (North line) out side of the closure periods?

On: Aug 03 2017.

Government Response. . As long as the work or any associated work does not interfere with navigation.

On: Aug 10 2017 Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

Bid this work according to the contract documents. Contractor must comply with identified sequence requirements as stated within 00 73 05, 1.3.2. Navigation operators and lock personnel continue to depend on the integrity of the existing guidewalls.

This supersedes the previous response to this question. On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7092852 Contracting SF 1442 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

SF1442 indicates this procurement is a Unrestricted Best Value Tradeoff. Please cite the FAR clause that describes the term or process of "Best Value Tradeoff".

On: Aug 03 2017.

Government Response. . Best Value Tradeoff policies and procedures are contained in FAR 15.101-Best Value Continuum. There is no FAR clause. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 5 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

8/24/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

b5ct9cjn Highlight b5ct9cjn Highlight b5ct9cjn Highlight

7093462 Contracting S-303 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the USACE provide a reference drawing showing the rebar in the existing wall?

On: Aug 03 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 10 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7095062 Contracting Spec 31 63 41 Page 4 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.5 of the referenced specification section requires each shaft be complete from drilling through concrete placement before work commences on the next shaft. Given the limited closure periods, would it be permissible to work on more than one shaft at a time? If this can be allowed, how much distance should be maintained between shafts being constructed concurrently?

On: Aug 04 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 10 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7096332 Contracting S201 - S 203 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Rephrase question 7085913:

Is bedrock the limestone layer shown in the reference material? Both limestone and shale are shown in the boring logs.

On: Aug 05 2017.

Government Response. . Bedrock is the limestone layer On: Aug 10 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7096950 Contracting Section 31 63 41 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 1.5, Drilling Plan, of the referenced specification includes the sentence "The work progresses from upstream drilled shafts to the downstream shafts." No other aspect of the work including crib grouting, demolition, or concrete placement includes a similar requirement. Is it permissible to construct drilled shafts from downstream to upstream if contractors deem that sequence beneficial?

On: Aug 07 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7098826 Contracting Form 1442-101 13 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We request a time extension of 2 weeks to the due date of the proposal. The additional time is needed to develop and finalize all means and methods for the unique scope of work for this project. Some questions and request for information from the USACE have not been fulfilled yet.

On: Aug 08 2017.

Government Response. . See amendment 0002 posted on 09 August 2017 On: Aug 10 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7099462 Contracting Form 1442-101 13

Page 6 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We request a bid date extension of 2 weeks for the purpose of gathering additional information and reviewing USACE question responses so that a more accurate, best value proposal may be created.

On: Aug 08 2017.

Government Response. . Amendment forth coming On: Aug 09 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7099518 Contracting S-311 31 63 41 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

S-501-A3-SHAFT CASING shows a 26" O.D.x3/4" WALL THICKNESS pipe. The inside diameter then is 24 1/2".

SECTION A5 on S-311 shows MINIMUM 25 1/2" DIAMETER DRILLED HOLES. The maximum drilled diameter would be 24 1/2" through the SHAFT CASING. Do you want a larger SHAFT CASING or smaller drilled holes?

On: Aug 08 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7101303 Civil S-303 03 05 05 Page 3 Part 3.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

SECTION 03 05 05 PART 3.1.1 states that breakers exceeding 1000 foot-pounds will mot be permitted. The USACE used 6,000 foot-pound and 3,500 foot-pound hydraulic breakers to remove the guidewalls to approximately elevation

552.1 in May of 2017. Will we be allowed to use the same size breakers to elevation 552.1 and then 1,000 foot-pound breakers to the final profiles?

On: Aug 09 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7101457 Contracting 31 32 23 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We understand that the purpose of the grouted zone is to fill void spaces within the crib areas. In order to create an appropriate grouting program, it is important to understand the existing conditions in the grout zone and its groutability. Has an exploratory program been conducted to understand the condition of the riprap or the nature of the void spaces. Is it known that the void spaces are still open in the riprap or if they are filled with fine grained material? The condition and composition of the void spaces will have a great influence on the grouting technique and the effectiveness of a grouting program.

On: Aug 09 2017.

Government Response. . No exploratory program has been conducted. No data has been collected to define void spaces within the riprap contained within the crib cells. On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7101462 Contracting 31 32 23 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Based on the unknown conditions of the planned grout zone, it is likely that the grouting program (both the number and location of the holes and the grout mix design) will need to be adjusted during the course of the work based on ground response. Please adjust the drilling and grouting pay items to reflect the substantial uncertainty of the work.

As reflected in Section 1.5, the conditions encountered may require changes in the grouting program.

On: Aug 09 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 7 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

7101471 Contracting 31 32 23 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 3.2.2 limits grouting operations to one grout location at a time. Please allow multiple locations to be grouted simultaneously.

Given the nature of the grout zone materials, and the difficulty of coring conglomerate materials, 90% core recovery and 50% RQD may be unrealistically high. Please relax these requirements.

On: Aug 09 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7102175 Contracting 208 Solicitation Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please extend the deadline for question at least 1 week.

On: Aug 10 2017.

Government Response. . The deadline for questions will be extended by one (1) week from 11 August 2017 to 18 August 2017 at 2:00pm CT. On: Aug 10 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7102286 Contracting S506, S507 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please verify the lengths and bottom elevation of the ladder recesses.

On: Aug 10 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 11 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7102425 Contracting Pre-Bid Meeting Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the USACE please publish the meeting minutes and sign in roster for the pre-bid meeting that was held on Tuesday July 25, 2017?

On: Aug 10 2017.

Government Response. . The pre-bid meeting sign in roster will not be posted. Office Policy prohibits this if Contractors are not aware or notified at the time of signing the roster will be posted. On: Aug 10 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7104626 Civil C-104 A1 31 24 01 & 35 31 19 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the embankment and stone protection be complete after the second closure when the weather is better?

On: Aug 11 2017.

Government Response. . Yes. There are no limitations in the contract that require the embankment and stone protection to be completed during a closure period On: Aug 15 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7104725 Civil S-303 & S-001 A1 & Note 5 03 05 05 Page 3 Part 3.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 8 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Section 03 05 05 Page 3.1.1 states "All horizontal and vertical edges shall be saw cut to full depth for concrete removal unless otherwise noted." Government Responses 7083329 and 7089035 state 3" and 6" saw cuts and removal beyond the limits apply. We interpret these responses to fulfill the "otherwise noted" of 03 05 05.

On: Aug 11 2017.

Government Response. . An amendment will be forthcoming On: Aug 15 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7113451 Civil S-301 A1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Detail A1 shows rip rap and bedding on the channel side of the guidewall. Will the rip rap specified in Division 35 and drawing C-104 be suitable if it has to be replaced during dewatering of the new guidewall construction?

On: Aug 18 2017.

Government Response. . Riprap is shown as existing conditions with no new work indicated within the plan set. Specified riprap in contract that is to cover the finished earthwork embankment would not be of suitable size/weight to serve as a replacement for the existing riprap identified in the question On: Aug 22 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7115181 Contracting Amendment 3 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Amendment 3 deleted requirement and bid items for drilling and grouting the crib wall prior to drilled shaft construction, but left contractors the option to drill and grout, if needed. If contractors elect to drill and grout the crib wall prior to drilled shaft construction, that work would likely be completed as a pre-closure activity with no associated pay item. Please consider adding an item for drilled shaft preparation work to compensate contractor for grouting or other preparatory work performed in advance of drilled shaft construction.

On: Aug 19 2017.

Government Response. . amendment is forth coming On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7116068 Contracting Solicitation Section II Sol. Provisions D(iv) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please refer to Page 18 of 209.

Provide Appendices (F) & (G) Sample Small Business Plans or a source for the examples.

On: Aug 21 2017.

Government Response. . Appendix F and Appendix G are now uploaded to Federal Business Opportunities-FBO On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7117376 Contracting Source Selection Plan Sect II.2 Factor 2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please refer to page 7 of 209.

The evaluation 2nd bullet states "Procedures for grouting the existing foundation cribbing...". Please confirm or clarify this evaluation criteria relative to the changes in scope made in Amendment 3.

On: Aug 22 2017.

Government Response. . In accordance with section 31 32 23 of amendment 0003, if grouting is proposed, the KTR shall provide submittals in accordance with procedures. If no grouting is proposed than the work plan will not demonstrate the methodology and therefore it will not be included in the bar graphs and not reviewed as part of the work plan evaluation. On: Aug 22 2017 Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

Grouting is considered part of the contractor's means and methods to construct the project. Payment for

Page 9 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

8/24/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

b5ct9cjn Highlight this operation can be shown in the Contractor's approved cost loaded schedule submitted in accordance with 01 32 16 Construction Progress Schedules under the CLIN it applies to. On: Aug 24 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 10 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User