Sources Sought MRR 2027 Waves 27may2026.pdf

This is a SOURCES SOUGHT notice that is issued solely for informational and planning purposes and does not constitute a solicitation. This notice is for market research purposes only and IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, nor does it restrict the Government as to the ultimate acquisition approach. This notice is open for responses from both small and other than small businesses, and responses will be utilized to determine if this requirement, or a portion of this requirement, can be set- aside for small businesses in accordance with (IAW)

Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO) 19.104, Small Business Set-

Asides. The Government will not reimburse respondents for any cost incurred in preparation of a response to this notice. Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. The Government does not intend to rank submittals or provide any reply to interested companies and responses will not be returned.

1. CONTRACT INFORMATION:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Medical Support Teams, located in Huntsville, AL, Little Rock, AR and Mobile, AL anticipate awarding multiple Medical Repair and Renewal

(MRR), Design-Build Contracts (see Table 1 – List of Locations). The contracts are to support the Defense Health Agency’s Medical Treatment Facilities.

The purpose of these acquisitions is to provide quick response for performing major repair and minor construction relating, but not limited, to the architectural, mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, security and safety areas of Government medical facilities. The anticipated

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The estimated value of these individual contracts will range from $100-500M including all optional tasks.

Table 1 – List of Locations

Location Mark Yes/No Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis AFB, Fairfield, CA

Womack Army Medical Center, Ft Bragg, Fayetteville, NC

Madigan Army Medical Center, JBLM, WA Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), Fort Sam

Houston, San Antonio, TX

Blanchfield Army Community Hospital (BACH), Ft

Campbell, Clarksville, TN

Tripler Army Medical Center, HI Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

(WRNMMC), Bethesda, MD

Eglin AFB Hospital, Eglin AFB, FL Mike O’Callaghan Military Medical Center, Nellis

AFB, NV

Evans Army Community Hospital, Ft Carson, CO Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps

Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, NC

PROJECT INFORMATION: The MRR contractors and subcontractors will be required to demonstrate an extensive working knowledge/experience of the functional operation of medical facilities, including equipment, facility support systems, and building structures. Since the facilities will be in full operation, the contractor will be required to minimize interference with the daily operation of the facilities and will be required to implement infection control processes and to comply with Joint Commission requirements for construction work in occupied medical facilities.

Work may range from reconfiguration of a single room or functional area, or repair of a single utility system component; to more extensive efforts of a hospital wing, including both repair of failed and failing systems and components, and minor construction of new systems and components.

To provide our partners with detailed information regarding this program, USACE will host a

Virtual Industry Day. This event will be an opportunity to learn more about the projects from a programmatic view and receive information regarding the scope of the anticipated work at each location, and projected timelines.

Date: 4 JUN 2026

Time: 10am Central Daylight Time (CDT)

More information on the Virtual Industry Day can be found at the following url:

https://sam.gov/opp/4a404f2fd4b549eb8f97fbbcf4dd5051/view

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Interested firms should submit the following:

1. Capabilities Questionnaire: Detailing your firm's relevant experience, capacity, and qualifications.

2. Non-Traditional Defense Contractor (NTDC) Status Survey: To formally determine your company's status as a traditional or non-traditional defense contractor.

3. Project Labor Agreement (PLA) Survey: A separate survey must be completed for each individual location your firm is targeting.

Computer files must be compatible with the latest version of Microsoft Word. Submit responses via email to: Morgan.A.Wilson@usace.army.mil. Submissions shall be received no later than 3pm

Central Time on 12 June 2026.

NO HARDCOPY OR FACSIMILE SUBMISSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED.

Cover letters and extraneous materials (brochures, etc.) will not be considered. Please keep your responses concise and submit only one reply. Questions concerning submissions should be directed to the email listed above. Personal visits for the purpose of discussing this announcement will not be scheduled. At this time, the program does not anticipate holding an industry day. Interested parties are responsible for monitoring modifications to this notice.

Attachment(s):

https://sam.gov/opp/4a404f2fd4b549eb8f97fbbcf4dd5051/view

- Div 01 Spec 2 MRR April 2026

CAPABILITIES QUESTIONNARE

1. Business Name (registered name in SAM.gov): (Insert)

2. Business Address: (Insert)

3. Cage Code: (Insert)

4. UEI: (Insert)

5. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code:

236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

If you believe the NAICS code above is not appropriate for this acquisition, please suggest an alternative code and provide a brief explanation.

6. Product Service Code (PSC): Z2DA Repair of Alteration of Hospitals and Infirmaries

If you believe the PSC above is not appropriate for this acquisition, please suggest an alternative code and provide a brief explanation.

7. Responsible Point of Contact(s): (Insert name, address, phone number, and email address)

8. Type of Business (Check all that apply):

8(a) Small Business Veteran-Owned Small Business

Service-disabled Veteran-Owned small business Minority Small Business

HUBZONE Small Business Native American Small Business

Small Disadvantaged Business Small Business

Woman Owned Small Business Other Than Small Business

9. Our firm will be proposing on this project as a:

Sole Contractor performing 100% of the work with no work being performed by a subcontractor.

Prime Contractor performing at least 50% of the work with subcontractor(s).

Prime Contractor performing at least 50% of the work with the following team member subcontractor(s) (Insert business name, business size, cage code, and work which will be subcontracted); or

Joint Venture with (insert business name, business size, and cage code), (See

FAR subpart 9.6 Government policy on teaming arrangements, as well as 8(a)

Program regulations described in 13 CFR124.513, HUBZone Program regulations described in 13 CFR 126.616, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Program regulations described in FAR 19.1403(c) and 13 CFR 125.15(b).

10. Bonding

a. Are you and your subcontractors capable of obtaining the required bonding? Yes/No

b. What is your maximum bonding capacity (i.e. construction bonding level) per contract or task order award, expressed in U.S. dollars?

c. What is your aggregate/cumulative construction bonding capacity, expressed in U.S.

dollars (i.e. sum of multiple contracts/task orders)?

11. Capability Statement: Does your firm (or team/joint venture) have the capability and qualifications to accomplish medical facility construction and repair/renewal efforts to include: architectural, mechanical, electrical, civil, structural, instrumentation, communications, security, force protection, safety, systems, as well as environmental and hazardous materials, in an active patient care environment?

12. Locations: Mark the chart below of locations with the locations you are interested in working in.

Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA

Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD)

David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis

AFB, Fairfield, CA

Womack Army Medical Center, Ft Bragg, Fayetteville, NC

Madigan Army Medical Center, JBLM, WA

Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), Fort

Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX

Blanchfield Army Community Hospital

(BACH), Ft Campbell, Clarksville, TN

Tripler Army Medical Center, HI

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

(WRNMMC), Bethesda, MD

Eglin AFB Hospital, Eglin AFB, FL

Mike O’Callaghan Military Medical Center, Nellis AFB, NV

Evans Army Community Hospital, Ft Carson, CO

Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune, Marine

Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, NC

13. Has your organization been awarded any federal contracts in the past 3 years?

Yes/No. If yes, please list the contract award number(s).

Non-Traditional Defense Contractor (NTDC) Status Survey

The Government is currently evaluating acquisition strategies for multiple upcoming repair and renewal projects. At this time, it has not been determined whether individual projects will be solicited via traditional Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)-based Design-Build contracts or via Other

Transaction Authority (OTA) for prototype or production projects under 10 U.S.C. § 4022. The

Government is utilizing this Request for Information (RFI) to assess market capabilities, industry interest, and the availability of Non-Traditional Defense Contractors (NTDCs). Industry feedback provided in response to this RFI will directly inform the Government's decision on the appropriate acquisition pathway (FAR-based Design-Build vs. OTA) for each respective project.

1. Non-Traditional Defense Contractor (NTDC) Status

Based on the definition below, does your company qualify as a Non-Traditional Defense Contractor

(NTDC)?

Definition: Under 10 U.S.C. § 3014, a Non-Traditional Defense Contractor (NTDC) is defined as an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense, any contract or subcontract for the

Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) prescribed pursuant to section 1502 of title 41 and the regulations implementing such section.

Response Selection Justification / Notes

Yes [ ]

If yes, please briefly explain (e.g., "Company has never held a

DoD contract" or "Company only holds contracts exempt from full CAS").

No [ ] If no, company is considered a traditional defense contractor.

PLA Survey

1. Please provide your company name, Unique Entity ID (UEI), and the name/contact information for the person filling out this survey.

2. Do you have knowledge that a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) has been used in the local area on projects of this kind? If so, please provide supporting documentation.

[ ] Yes, I have had a contract requiring a PLA.

[ ] Yes, I know other General Contractors who have had contracts in this area with PLA’s.

[ ] No, I do not have knowledge or personal experience with PLA’s being used in the local area.

3. Are you aware of skilled labor shortages in the area for those crafts that will be needed to complete the referenced project?

[ ] No, I am not aware of any skilled labor shortages that would be needed to complete the referenced project.

[ ] Yes, the following skilled labor categories are in short supply. (Refer to question 4)

[ ] Unsure

4. If you answered "Yes" to Question 3, please provide the labor categories with known shortages as well as supporting documentation where possible.

5. In your view, how do PLAs affect project timelines and overall efficiency?

[ ] Provides structure and labor-management stability.

[ ] Provides for easier coordination among various subcontractors.

[ ] Eases uncertainty regarding terms and conditions of employment of various groups of workers.

[ ] Reduces the time to get all subcontractors in place.

[ ] It does not affect project timeline nor overall efficiency.

[ ] Unsure as I have no experience with PLA’s.

6. Do you believe a PLA would help contribute to cost savings on projects?

[ ] Yes

[ ] No, it would not contribute to cost savings in my opinion.

[ ] Unsure as I have no experience with PLA’s.

If Yes, check all that you feel apply.

[ ] Availability of trained, registered apprentices, efficient for highly skilled workforce.

[ ] Allowing for changes in apprentice to journeyman ratio.

[ ] Serving as a management tool that ensures highly skilled workers from multiple trades are coordinated in the most efficient way.

[ ] Harmonization of shifts and holidays between the trades to cut labor costs.

7. Could a PLA minimize risk and contribute to greater efficiency in any of the following ways?

Check all that apply.

[ ] Mechanisms to avoid delays.

[ ] Complying with labor standards, safety rules and EEO and OFCCP laws.

[ ] Ensuring a steady supply of skilled labor in markets with low supply of high competition for workers.

[ ] No, based upon my experience they do not minimize risk.

[ ] Unsure, I have no experience with PLA’s.

8. What Challenges have you experienced with implementing PLA’s on projects?

9. Would the required use of a PLA on this project prevent you from submitting a proposal?

[ ] Yes

[ ] No

10. Are you aware of time sensitive issues/scheduling requirements that would affect the rate at which the referenced project should be completed? If so, please elaborate and provide supporting documentation where possible.

11. Identify specific reasons why or how you believe a PLA would advance (or not advance) the

Federal Government's interest in achieving economy and efficiency in federal procurement.

12. Identify any additional information you believe should be considered on the use of a PLA on the referenced project.

13. Identify any additional information you believe should be considered on the non-use of a PLA on the referenced project.