W912DY-18-R-0022-0002.pdf

DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING - HNC

ATTN: MIGUEL LANG

256-895-5238

HUNTSVILLE AL 35816

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

**See summary of changes**

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 69

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DY18R0022

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Mar-2018

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEERING & SUPPORT CENTER

HUNTSVILLE ENGINEERING & SUPPORT CENTER

P.O. BOX 1600

HUNTSVILLE AL 35807-4301

W912DY 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE W912DY

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DY18R0022

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0008

The option status has changed from No Status to Option.

CLIN 0016

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0017.

CLIN 0017

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0018.

CLIN 0018

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0019.

The option status has changed from No Status to Option.

CLIN 0019

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0020.

CLIN 0020

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0021.

CLIN 0021

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0022.

CLIN 0022

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0023.

CLIN 0023

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0024.

CLIN 0024

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0025.

CLIN 0025

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0026.

CLIN 0026

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0027.

CLIN 0016 is added as follows:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

OPTION Task 7a Remedial Action Report (RAR)

FFP

Task 7a additional RAR FOB: Destination

NET AMT

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

DESCRIPTION/WORK STATEMENT

MILITARY MUNITIONS REMEDIATION SERVICES

AT FORMER WAIKOLOA MANEUVER AREA

27 November 2017 Revision Date: 12 March 2018

Revision: 1

Summary of revisions to Section C (Changes are in Red) Paragraph 5.4.5 has been amended for clarification.

Paragraph 6.1 has been amended to delete reference to option periods since this is a standalone single award contract.

References to Property Manager and Property Management have been deleted throughout Section C.

1.0 OBJECTIVE.

1.1 The objective of this Firm Fixed Priced competitive 8(a) stand-alone solicitation is to procure the services of a Small Business 8(a) firm to remove Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) and Munition Potentially

Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH) at multiple Munition Response Sites (MRSs) that have signed Decision Documents to meet the selected remedy requirements in the Decision Document in compliance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, and Department of Defense, Army, and USACE Regulations and Guidance to include Interim Guidance and all applicable Data Item Descriptions (DID). The focus areas for this Contract are Areas B, O, Q and J-CLEARED – PROJECT 02. If right of entry cannot be obtained, at the discretion of the Government, clearance will be moved to another area within the former Waikoloa Maneuver Area and acreage will be negotiated based on terrain and land use.

1.2 This work may occur at sites within the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Waikoloa Maneuver Area located on the Island of Hawaii, Hawaii. The services provided under this contract will be used in support of various MMRP remedial actions at the Former Waikoloa Maneuver Area.

1.3 The Contractor shall safely locate; identify; recover, evaluate; assess; package; transport; manage; and make final disposition, as required, of Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC), and incidental Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste (HTRW). Work performed under this contract may include project planning; assessments;

inspections; surveys; remedial actions; recovery; storage; transportation; and disposal, as required, of MEC to include Munitions Constituents (MC), incidental HTRW such as spill response; data management; public involvement; and logistical and security support. Work efforts may consist of advanced geophysical classification where feasible and practical.

1.4 Specific services and task activities are listed in Chapter 3. The description of work stated herein provides a general understanding of the Contractor functions to be performed and specific performance-based requirements.

2.0 GENERAL.

2.1 The Contractor shall perform Military Munitions Remediation Services to protect human health and the environment from hazards associated with military munitions, as well as human health and the environment from risks associated with incidental HTRW, MC, and other adverse environmental conditions. The terms "Munitions or MC Response", "MEC, or MC operations", "Munitions Response activities", and "Munitions Response Sites (MRS)" generally apply to work performed under the Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP). For the purposes of this contract the term “HTRW response” represents any and all work required under environmental remediation. Specific services and task activities are listed in Paragraph 3.

2.2 Permits and Licenses. The Contractor shall obtain the permits and licenses necessary to conduct work required by this Contract including, but not necessarily limited to, environmental permits, building permits, licenses to purchase explosives, and Department of Transportation (DOT) requirements for the transport of MEC, MC, and incidental HTRW on public highways. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, including TB 700-2, when transporting MEC and/or MPPEH.

2.3 Applicable Laws and Regulations. The Contractor shall perform this work in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Contractor shall be responsible for acquiring the latest version of applicable regulatory or agency guidance, including but not limited to the referenced documents cited in this Solicitation, unless otherwise specified.

2.4 Publications and References. All work under this contract shall be in accordance with the applicable publications and references in this Section C.

2.5 Data Ownership and Data Rights. All reports and data whatsoever, including all electronic data, generated under this contract will be determined by negotiation IAW the DFARS. When submitting proposals, offerors shall identify IAW DFARS 252.227-7017 to the extent known all technical data or software that will be delivered with restrictions on its use, release, or disclosure.

2.6 Safety and Health Program. The Contractor shall develop and implement a written Safety and Health Program in accordance with guidelines specified in EM 385-1-1. The Contractor shall ensure that its subcontractors, suppliers, and support personnel follow all safety and health provisions established in the approved Accident

Prevention Plan (APP) for each site. A Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP) shall be included in the APP as an Attachment. No work shall be undertaken at any project site by a Contractor without an approved APP/SSHP work plan. The Government reserves the right to stop work under this contract for any violations at no additional cost to the Government. The Government will verify that the Contractor has implemented corrective action before allowing continued performance under the contract.

2.6.1 Medical Surveillance. An ongoing medical surveillance program meeting the requirements of 29 CFR

1910.120 shall be developed for personnel performing onsite activities.

2.6.2 Personal Protective Equipment. A written Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) program is required IAW 29CFR1910.120 (g) (5), 29 CFR 1926.65(g)(5) and EM 385-1-1.

2.7 Munitions with Unknown Liquid Filler. During conventional MEC or other munitions related operations, if the Contractor identifies or suspects an unknown liquid filled munition, the Contractor shall immediately withdraw upwind from the work area and contact the responsible Contracting Officer (KO) and the appropriate point of contact in their Work Plan (WP)/Accident Prevention Plan (APP). The Contractor shall secure the area and provide two personnel located upwind of the suspect unknown liquid filled munition to secure the site until relieved by the Department of the Army emergency response personnel. Additional support may be required by the emergency response personnel, e.g. construction of blast mitigation controls.

2.8 Improved Conventional Munitions. (ICM). Prior to entering areas/ranges contaminated with Improved Conventional Munitions (ICMs) or submunitions, a Department of the Army (DA) a Deviation Approval and Risk Acceptance Document (DARAD) in accordance with DA Pam 385-30 must be conducted by the Contractor and approved by the affected installation or for FUDS properties, the executing Corps district. If an ICM or submunitions is found at a site not previously known to contain ICMs or submunitions, work will cease the Contractor will contact the responsible KO and the appropriate point of contact in their Work Plan (WP)/Accident Prevention Plan (APP). The Contractor shall secure the area and provide two personnel to secure the site until relieved by the Department of the Army emergency response personnel. Additional support may be required by the emergency response personnel, e.g., construction of blast mitigation controls.

2.9 HTRW at MMRP. During Munitions Responses or other munitions related operations, the Contractor may encounter HTRW material containers, landfills, Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD) areas, ground spills, contaminated surface water, or contaminated groundwater. If suspected HTRW of unknown origin and nature is encountered, the Contractor shall immediately stop work in the affected area, and notify the responsible KO and the appropriate point of contact in their UFP-QAPP. The Contractor shall take necessary actions to protect the safety of its workforce, the public, and the environment in close consultation with the KO.

2.10 HTRW. Work performed at incidental HTRW locations will likely follow a spill during MMRP work. If disposal is required, the Contractor shall ensure that all hazardous waste is properly transported to and disposed of at a permitted Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local requirements.

2.11 Laboratory Capabilities.

2.11.1 Laboratories must demonstrate compliance with the DoD Quality Systems Manual (DoD QSM) (latest version) through accreditation by the DoD Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (DoD ELAP) for all project-required parameters. A list of laboratories accredited under DoD ELAP can be found at the DoD ELAP Denix web site at http://www.denix.osd.mil/edqw/Accreditation/AccreditedLabs.cfm. The laboratory used shall have experience handling media potentially contaminated with munitions constituents and shall be identified early in the project planning (at the proposal stage). For additional details on laboratory requirements, see DID HNC- 005.02.

2.11.2 Any laboratory performing chemical analysis must provide its DoD ELAP accreditation certificate and supporting documentation to the applicable Military Munitions Design Center (MM DC) in order to be approved by that MM DC. If the laboratory fails to meet project-specific requirements, the KO or Contracting Officer’s http://www.denix.osd.mil/edqw/Accreditation/AccreditedLabs.cfm

Representative (COR) may require the contractor to stop using this laboratory and obtain analytical services from another qualified laboratory that can meet project-specific requirements. The contract laboratory may not subcontract analytical services to another laboratory without the approval of the KO. The subcontracted laboratory must meet all requirements for the contract laboratory.

2.11.3 Proposals shall identify the primary laboratory and secondary laboratory (ies) to be used for performing chemical analysis.

2.12 Security. In accordance with Engineering Regulation, ER 380-1-18 (http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/), Section 4, foreign nationals who work on USACE contracts shall be approved by the HQUSACE Foreign Disclosure Officer or higher before beginning work on the contract. This regulation includes subcontractor employees. The contractor shall submit to the Contracting office the names of all foreign nationals proposed for performance under this contract, along with documentation to verify that he/she was legally admitted into the United States and has authority to work in the U.S. Additional security requirements may apply such as those required to fulfill OPORD 2013-74 (Integrating Antiterrorism (AT) and Operations Security (OPSEC) into the USACE Acquisition Process).

Additionally, the contractor shall implement iWATCH and/or CorpsWatch Training. The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall brief all employees on the local iWATCH, CorpsWatch, or See Something, Say Something program (training standards provided by the requiring activity ATO). This local developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the COR. This training shall be completed within 30 days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after contract award.

2.13 Performance-Based Milestones/Objectives: The Government defines Performance Based Milestones/Objectives as the desired outcome(s) that have been defined in the Performance Work Statement in clear, simple, concise, results-oriented, measurable and legally enforceable terms. The Government defines the completion of a Performance Based Milestone/Objective as: an outcome that has been 100% completed and approved and accepted by the approval authority under the Contract. Simply meeting the Milestone/Objective, (i.e., submittal of a document for review) is not the same as completion of the Milestone/Objective. Only upon the completion, approval, and acceptance will the Government pay for that Milestone/Objective. The contractor’s submittal of payment vouchers/invoices for any Milestone/Objective, shall be after the Milestone/Objective has been completed, approved, and accepted by the Government, not at the time of submission to the Government.

2.13.1 Milestones will be considered met or completed when the required Quality Control (QC) documentation has been submitted, the Quality Assurance (QA) completed, and the submittal and/or product is approved/accepted by the KO or their representative. Any payment vouchers / invoices submitted that do not coincide with final acceptance or milestones or do not have the appropriate QC documentation will be rejected. All payments will be made utilizing an agreed upon Payment Milestone Schedule. The Contractor shall provide suggested milestones for payment which will be either accepted or negotiated prior to award. Milestones for payment shall be shown on the project schedule.

2.13.2 The following is a list of potential milestones for payment:

- Final Submittals: upon government acceptance, for example: Final WP

- Field Work: for defined units and activities completed and QA review and acceptance, for example: Final QC density data package.

- Meetings: after completion of meetings with government acceptance of meeting minutes, for example: Final Technical Project Planning Memorandum.

2.14 Available Site Specific information will be provided with the request for proposal for contractor review and use via either a designated Internet site or delivery of recorded data on CD/DVD. This information may include but is not limited to general site history, previous investigations and other documentation.

2.15 This contract is for remediation of MEC and MPPEH at multiple MRSs and incidental HTRW contamination caused by the contractor. It is not intended to remediate waste, debris, or trash that is not a result of FUDS use by the military. Waste, debris, or trash that is not a result of FUDS use can be moved but not be disposed of by the contractor.

http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/

3.0 SPECIFIC SERVICES.

3.0.1 Contractor Methods: This is a performance based Contract. The performance objectives and standards included herein are the basis of the contract requirements. The technical approach and level of effort expended to achieve Contract objectives and standards are solely up to the contractor to select and adjust as necessary through the life of the Contract. Government recognizes the contractor’s right to change the technical approach and level of effort from that proposed with the understanding that the contractor shall still meet all project objectives and gain government Quality Assurance acceptance in order to receive payment.

3.0.2 Quality monitoring and measurement: The contractor will be evaluated periodically during performance of this Contract to ensure compliance with the proposed and accepted performance goals, regulations, guidance and DIDs, and to document that acceptance criteria (AC), delivery schedule, and the overall completion date are being met. This evaluation will be performed according to a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). A programmatic QASP will be provided by the government as a starting point for the contractor prepared Draft QASP per Task 3. The government will finalize the contractor’s Draft QASP. This final QASP will be supplied to the contractor and used by the government to evaluate the contractor’s performance. Failure to adequately complete any service or submittal to at least a satisfactory level of quality or timeliness may result in a repeat of the work, and/or a poor performance evaluation, or both.

3.0.3 Performance Requirements: Performance requirements are addressed in each task and summarized in the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) provided in Attachment A. Performance metrics are provided in Attachment B. If discrepancies or ambiguity exists between the documents, the order of precedence is 1) the Task;

2) Performance Requirements Summary; 3) Performance Metrics.

3.0.4 Task Pricing: A pricing schedule is provided in a Price Spreadsheet provided separately. This Contract will be Firm Fixed Priced incorporating Service (Contract Act) or Davis-Bacon Act wages, as applicable.

3.0.5 KO Requirements: Only a warranted KO (either a Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) or an Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)), acting within their delegated limits, has the authority to issue modifications or otherwise change the terms and conditions of this contract. If an individual other than the KO attempts to make changes to the terms and conditions of this contract you shall not proceed with the change and shall immediately notify the KO.

3.0.6 Pre-proposal Site Visit: A site visit may be authorized by the KO to assist in the preparation of the Contractor’s proposal. Cost for this site visit will be at the Contractor’s own expense. The Government strongly encourages, but does not require, the Contractor to prepare an Abbreviated Accident Prevention Plan (AAPP) to ensure extra safety precautions are taken to avoid an accident. No intrusive activities shall be conducted during the site visit and site access restrictions may apply. In the event that an MPPH/UXO/MEC item is discovered during the site visit, prior to departing the site, the contractor shall notify the on-site USACE Ordnance & Explosives Safety Specialist (OESS). Failure to report discovered items could result in disqualification, of the company, from competition on that requirement.

3.1 Task 1, Project Management Plan (PMP).

3.1.1 Objective: Prepare, submit, and gain government approval of a PMP that is detailed and comprehensive covering all aspects of the Remedial Action process. This document is a living document and shall be updated as necessary.

3.1.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the PMP in accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 5-1; AR 11-2; USACE PMBP Manual, PROC2000, PMP-PgMP Development, REF8005G; PMP-PgMP Content and Data Item Description

(DID) HNC-012.01.

3.1.3 Acceptance Criteria (AC): Acceptance of PMP with one revision.

http://bp-d.pmbp.wes.army.mil/pmbp/index.htm http://bp-d.pmbp.wes.army.mil/pmbp/index.htm

3.1.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Government review of PMP per guidance to verify that a document meeting all Performance Standards and Task Specific Requirements has been provided.

3.1.5 Task specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating/less than satisfactory CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.1.6 Specific Task Requirements: The contractor shall populate the USAESCH PMP PDF form provided by the Government, coordinating with the USAESCH Project Manager as needed. In addition to the DID HNC-009.01 project status reporting requirements, the contractor shall include a project kick-off meeting and in-progress review (IPR) meetings. IPR meetings shall include but are not limited to, regular feedback to the Government on the progress of its work through face-to-face meetings, electronic mails, and regularly scheduled telephone conversations.

3.2 Task 2, Systematic Project Planning (SPP).

3.2.1. Objective: Implement Systematic Project Planning in order to conduct a remedial action sufficient to achieve site closeout.

3.2.1.1 Optional Task 2a, Additional Meeting.

3.2.2 Performance Standard: Achieve the objectives of each SPP phase referring to TPP guidance in EM 200-1-2, EM 200-1-15 and applicable Interim Guidance Documents. The appropriate UFP QAPP Worksheets shall be used in place of the TPP worksheets. Facilitate meetings in a professional and organized manner.

3.2.3 (AC): Acceptance of SPP documents (meeting presentations, agenda, handouts, Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and memorandums) with up to one (1) revision. Meeting materials are received at least two weeks prior to meetings. Meetings held are organized; accomplish requirements of the SPP process; and are conducted in a professional manner. Zero letters of formal grievances or letters of concern.

3.2.4 Measurement / Monitoring: A SPP checklist for each phase, as provided in the EM 200-1-2, EM 200-1-15 and other applicable Interim Guidance Documents, will be used to measure and document progress; guidance cited will be used to evaluate content of documents for acceptance / non-acceptance. The Government will attend and evaluate organization and facilitation of the meetings, and professional nature of the meetings.

3.2.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating/ less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.2.6 Specific Task Requirements: The contractor shall utilize the SPP process to obtain consensus on specific Data Quality Objectives (DQO), Conceptual Site Model (CSM), Advanced Classification Verification Plan (ACVP) and Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPP) worksheets. The contractor shall present DQOs necessary to achieve the performance standards in Task 5. The Contractor shall plan for meetings to occur as follows: first meeting, with USAESCH and the District resulting in DQOs, CSM, ACVP, and Draft QAPP worksheets; second meeting, pre-QAPP with entire Project Delivery Team (PDT), resulting in DQOs, CSM, ACVP, and Draft QAPP worksheets consensus, and SPP Memorandum; third meeting, to finalize QAPP with resulting SPP addendum; Fourth meeting, to present and explain all classification results to the Government and regulators, who will use those results and explanations to finalize the Verification Plan. First meeting may be held at a local office, or by webinar, subject to PDT team approval. Second SPP meeting shall not occur until DQOs, CSM, ACVP, and Draft QAPP worksheets are accepted by the government. The contractor shall allow two full business days for first and second SPP meetings in order to complete both the project overview, documentation and gain consensus. The contractor shall organize and coordinate all meetings; identify and involve all stakeholders, upon approval by the Government; and be responsible for the logistics of these meetings to include, but not limited to, providing a facilitator, obtaining meeting location, and sending invitation letters (pending government review and acceptance).

If a site visit is planned prior to acceptance of a QAPP, the Contractor shall prepare and submit for acceptance an Abbreviated Accident Prevention Plan (AAPP). Starting at the SPP process the Contractor shall include process of considering, incorporating, documenting, and evaluating the benefits of green and sustainable remediation (GSR) practices Pursuant to the Department of Defense (DoD) Memorandum “Consideration of Green and Sustainable Remediation Practices in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program” (DoD, 2009) and EP 200-1-10, Green Building Technology in Hazardous Waste Cleanup Applications, GSR employs strategies throughout the remedial process that:

• Use natural resources and energy efficiently;

• Reduce negative impacts on the environment;

• Minimize or eliminate pollution at its source;

• Protect and benefit the community at large; and

• Reduce waste to the greatest extent possible.

3.3 Task 3, Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plan (UFP-QAPP), and QASP.

3.3.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of a UFP-QAPP and QASP that are detailed and comprehensive plans covering all aspects of the remedial action, and project execution, including a discussion of statutory and regulatory requirements for the project.

3.3.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the UFP-QAPP in accordance with DID HNC-001.02; EM 200-1-15; EM 385- 1-1; and EM 385-1-97 including Errata Sheets and Changes; Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force Uniform Federal Policy (UFP)-QAPP Manual; Advanced Geophysical Classification Quality Assurance Project Plan (AGC- QAPP) template interim guidance from ESTCP, and other Interim Guidance and DIDs as appropriate. The Draft QASP shall include systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed to include monitoring Quality Control requirements in regulations, guidance, DIDs and the Quality Control Plan in the UFP-QAPP.

3.3.3 AC: Acceptance of UFP-QAPP with two revisions. Draft QASP reflects requirements and quality control with one revision required.

3.3.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of UFP-QAPP and QASP to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided and meets applicable guidance.

3.3.5 Task specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/less than satisfactory CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.3.6 Specific Task Requirements: Incorporate all decisions pursuant to the SPP process.

3.3.7 Optional Task 3a, Explosive Safety Submission. If this optional task is not awarded, an Explosive Safety Submission will be provided by the government for inclusion in the UFP-QAPP.

3.3.7.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of an Explosives Safety Submission.

3.3.7.2 Performance Standard: Prepare required submission in accordance with DoD 6055.09-M, EM 385-1-97 and Errata Sheet #3 as a standalone document for inclusion after acceptance into the UFP-QAPP.

3.3.7.3 AC: Acceptance of submission with two revisions. One additional revision to incorporate EM-CX, USATCES and/or DDESB comments is acceptable.

3.3.7.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review by Government using guidance cited to determine acceptability.

3.3.7.5 Task specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/less than satisfactory CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.3.7.6 Specific Task Requirements: Allow eight (8) weeks in the schedule for DDESB approval after submission of final document to the CEHNC-CX.

3.4 Task 4, GeoSpatial Data.

3.4.1 Objective: Utilize the existing Geographic Information System (GIS) data and maintain and manage all new project and geospatial data.

3.4.2 Performance Standard: Manage and maintain project data in GIS IAW ER 1110-1-8156, EM 1110-1-2909, EM 200-1-15, and DID HNC-006.02.

3.4.3 AC: Acceptance of CSM and GeoSpatial Data submissions meeting quality and formatting requirements.

3.4.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review by Government using guidance cited to determine acceptability.

3.4.5 Task specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/less than satisfactory CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.4.6 Specific Task Requirements: The GeoSpatial Data shall include:

- Pre and post-project response action geospatial data analysis shall be performed using a GIS. All available existing data that is applicable to the project shall be consolidated into the GeoDatabase and analyzed to relay pertinent information to the PDT.

- Analysis of data from the GIS shall support all discussions and conclusions in the Remedial Action Report.

- Management of data from the remedial action may detail the fieldwork strategies, areas of concern, survey requirements, environmental concerns, milestones and/or other factors that affect product delivery and future action planning.

- Entities that may be affected by the remedial action should also be represented within the GIS data if possible.

These include but are not limited to: landowners, recreational areas, and water bodies.

- The GeoDatabase shall be a living repository that is refined throughout the life of the project.

- Incorporate layers that overlay on maps of the site that identify physical features, material potentially presenting an explosive hazard (MPPEH) and munitions debris (MD) found during the removal. Examples include: anomalies, MEC positively identified, identifiable MD, sampling location, cultural resources, and environmental, biological, and socio-economic information.

- Archeological site location(s) will be included in the GeoDatabase, but will not be released to the public without written permission from USACE.

-ESRI ArcGIS geodatabase in v. 10 using Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment, v.

2.6 accompanied by Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) compliant metadata.

- Projection is UTM Zone 5, meters, and datum is NAD83.

- For GIS information that is collected from other sources, the Contractor shall incorporate the Government provided GIS information as is practical in defining the project’s existing conditions. Further information on geospatial products, including available data, imagery, GPS data dictionaries, and metadata templates from the Corps of Engineers, shall be defined by USACE.

- The GIS data and submittals shall be coordinated with the Honolulu District Technical Integration Branch GIS Specialist.

- All relevant GIS data shall be submitted to the Honolulu District, Technical Integration Branch, and the USAESCH for each version of the report(s), including but not limited to Draft, Draft Final, Final, and any submittals required for back check.

- Final GIS Project deliverable shall include but is not limited to all documentation, reports, meeting minutes, databases, figures, etc. created, developed or modified under this Contract in original/native file and PDF format.

This deliverable shall meet QA acceptance prior to payment of final invoice. At completion of the project, all GIS data shall be submitted to the Honolulu District, Technical Integration Branch, and the USAESCH

- Property owner privacy will be preserved. Property owner names shall not be disseminated in any documents.

- Track and assist the District in obtaining property Rights-of-Entry as needed using the Government provided spreadsheet of TMK, landowner(s), and ROE documents and implement in a GIS using the County TMK GIS database.

- The Government will provide existing GIS data for the Former Waikoloa Maneuver Area.

- Based on GIS data the following conditions can be expected:

- Areas B, O, Q and J-Cleared – Project 02 (FUDS Project No. H09HI035902) ~ 31 acres of heavy vegetation, rough terrain watershed ravine.

~ 33 acres of debris piles, construction debris, or other conditions that would cause heavy saturation of metallic items.

Remaining acreage is residential or otherwise developed.

3.5 Task 5, Response Field Activities.

3.5.1 Objective: Conduct a remedial action (RA) in accordance with the accepted QAPP, ESS and all applicable standards such that the objective of this PWS is met. Also, meeting the project DQOs as defined during the SPP process. This task shall include all field activities necessary to execute this task. Work shall be performed as a combination of Advance Geophysical Classification (AGC) and Mag ‘n Dig. It is expected that residential and developed areas will be AGC if the depth of soil warrants it and the remainder will be Mag ‘n Dig. Award will be made based on availability of funding.

3.5.1.1 Task 5a, 5.5 Acres AGC in Areas B, O, Q and J-Cleared – Project 02 (FUDS Project No. H09HI035902).

3.5.1.2 Optional Task 5b, 5 Acres ACG Areas B, O, Q and J-Cleared – Project 02.

3.5.1.3 Optional Task 5c, 24.2 Acres Mag ‘n Dig Areas B, O, Q and J-Cleared – Project 02

3.5.1.4 Optional Task 5d, 10 Acres Mag ‘n Dig Areas B, O, Q and J-Cleared – Project 02

3.5.1.5 Optional Task 5e, 5 Acres Mag ‘n Dig Areas B, O, Q and J-Cleared – Project 02

3.5.1.6 Optional Task 5f, Mob/Demob UXO Field Team.

3.5.2 The following applies to the above subtasks:

3.5.2.1 Performance Standard: Field work, quality, and analysis of said data shall meet the following standards:

- The Government finding on the surface of the munitions response site no MEC or MPPEH regardless of size excluding small arms ammunition (.50 cal and smaller),

- The Government finding within the subsurface of the munitions response site no MEC and MPPEH up to the specified clearance depth;

- QC deliverables and QA inspections/review demonstrate that the work was performed in accordance with the accepted UFP-QAPP, ESS, and all applicable laws, regulations, and guidance documents;

- Proper processing and disposition of UXO, DMM and MD encountered in accordance with approved plan(s).

- All Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH) and munitions debris processed in accordance with EM 385-1-97 and applicable Errata Sheets, DoD Manual 6055.09M and DoDI 4140.62.

- All geophysics shall be IAW EM 200-1-15.

- At a minimum, coordinate with USACE, State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR), as applicable, Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), and Big Island Fire and Police Departments for all demolition to be conducted. Stakeholders and the public shall be provided notice 24 hours prior to demolition activities.

- Contractor shall maintain DAGCAP certification, if applicable.

3.5.2.2 AC: Conduct the RA in accordance with the accepted/approved UFP-QAPP and ESS.

- QC data submitted meets requirements described in DID HNC-003.02 and EM 200-1-15.

- No more than 2-3 CARs/ Engineer Form (EF) 6048s for non-critical violations and/or 1 CAR/EF 6048 for critical violation. No unresolved corrective action requests.

- All final data and QC tests/documentation submitted. Government QA acceptance of QC tests/documentation gained.

- No Class “A” Safety accidents, contractor at fault; No Class “B”, contractor at Fault, no more than 1 non-explosive Class “C” accident; and <2 non-explosive related Class “D” accidents, IAW AR 385-40

- Major safety violations, no more than 1 non-explosive related safety violation.

- Minor safety violations, no more than 2 safety violations.

- Zero letters of formal grievance or letters of concern.

3.5.2.3 Measurement / Monitoring: Periodic inspection/review of field work and data. Verify compliance with accepted UFP-QAPP. Review of quality control tests/documentation submitted for QA.

3.5.2.4 Task specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/less than satisfactory CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.5.2.5 Specific Task Requirements:

-If Right of Entry cannot be obtained in Areas B, O, Q, J - Cleared, the government will select acreage elsewhere within the Former Waikoloa Maneuver Area. Density of anomalies is presumed similar in other locations as are present in Areas B, O, Q, J – Cleared.

- An appropriate level of monitoring for and protection of Ecological and Cultural resources shall be performed per Ecological Resources Plan (ERP) and Archaeological Monitoring Plan (AMP) (same as Cultural Resource Plan in EM 200-1-15) in the UFP-QAPP.

- Maintain a detailed accounting of all UXO, DMM, MD and range-related debris encountered per DID HNC-

003.02. This accounting shall include as a minimum: amounts of UXO, DMM and MD; nomenclature; location and depth of UXO/DMM; location of MD; and final disposition. The accounting system shall also account for all demolition materials utilized on site. Digital photographs of UXO and DMM and examples of MD found during the investigation are to be taken.

- All UXO, DMM and MC encountered during this munitions response shall be processed in accordance with the approved work and safety plans.

- The contractor shall take focused, properly lighted and adequately high resolution photographs of property conditions prior to and after completion of removal efforts at every property to include photographs of neighboring structures prior to demolition activities.

- After completion of all field activities the contractor shall write an after action report to close out the ESS.

- The contractor is responsible for evacuations which may require hiring of police officers is necessary, coordination will all State and County agencies, and making public announcements as necessary.

- Digital Advanced Geophysical Classification Accreditation Program (DAGCAP). The contractor, or subcontractor in charge of advanced geophysical classification, shall be accredited in accordance with the DoD Advanced Geophysical Classification Accreditation Program. The Contractor shall notify their AB of each validation seed failure in accordance with the requirements of their accreditation. If, for any reason, the DAGCAP accredited geophysical classification organization (GCO) responsible for the advanced geophysical classification has their accreditation suspended or revoked, the contractor shall identify an alternate DAGCAP accredited GCO to complete the contract at no extra cost to the Government. Work shall be in compliance with AGC-QAPP. The contractor shall identify personnel with experience in AGC (minimum Experience described below); explain how AGC will be implemented to include equipment, planning documents, site preparation, seeding programs, survey, cue and classification.

- AGC Personnel Experience: Requirements are in addition to Section 5.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS requirements. Personnel identified as having AGC experience may be employed by the prime contractor or the subcontractor.

Project Manager (PM). The PM shall be responsible for implementing specific work under this contract. He/she shall evaluate the requirements of the contract and shall develop and implement a plan to meet those requirements.

The PM shall be the primary point-of-contact for the contract. The PM should have, as a minimum the following qualifications At least one (1) advanced classification project to include management at the field operational level; or Five (5) years’ experience managing environmental or munitions projects at the field operational level.

Senior Project Geophysicist. At a minimum, the Senior Project Geophysicist shall be responsible for geophysical survey design, dynamic data collection, cued data collection, development of a validation plan, and all other plans and reports supporting the Advanced Geophysical Classification process. The Senior Project Geophysicist shall have, at a minimum, the following qualifications:

A degree in geophysics, engineering geophysics, or closely related field or equivalent demonstrated proficiency with advanced geophysical methods and concepts related to munitions response and possess 5 years of directly related UXO geophysical experience.

Experience with the theoretical and practical aspects of detecting and selecting a wide range of targets of interest (TOI) and non-targets of interest (non-TOI).

Experienced in the selection and utilization of various types of geophysical instruments and ancillary components to include high-precision global positioning systems, inertial motion sensors and the software used to control and integrate the geophysical system as a whole.

Shall be a member(s) of the Project Geophysicist personnel cited in the contractor’s DAGCAP accreditation.

Quality Control Geophysicist. At a minimum, the QC geophysicist shall be responsible for the quality of all aspects of quality control except those relating to UXO operations and which fall under the responsibility of the UXOQCS.

The QC Geophysicist shall have, at a minimum, the following qualifications:

A degree in geophysics, engineering geophysics, or closely related field or equivalent demonstrated proficiency with advanced geophysical methods and concepts related to munitions response and possess 5 years of directly related UXO geophysical experience.

Must be experienced with the theoretical and practical aspects of detecting and selecting a wide range of targets of interest (TOI) and non-targets of interest (non-TOI).

Experienced in the selection and utilization of various types of geophysical instruments and ancillary components to include high-precision global positioning systems, inertial motion sensors and the software used to control and integrate the geophysical system as a whole.

The QC Geophysicist shall be a member of the QC personnel cited in the contractor’s DAGCAP accreditation Field Geophysicist. The field geophysicist(s) shall be responsible for proper operation of advanced geophysical EMI systems and performing quality control during advanced EMI system surveys. Field Geophysicist(s) shall have, at a minimum, the following qualifications:

One year of directly related UXO geophysical experience.

Documented or independently verifiable experience operating an advanced geophysical EMI system to include the geophysical instruments, high-precision global positioning systems, inertial motion sensors and the software used to control and integrate the geophysical system as a whole.

3.5.2.5.1 Prepare for and Perform DGM

3.5.2.5.1.1 All geophysics shall be IAW EM 200-1-15 and interim guidance from ESTCP, with the following exceptions and additions: raw ASCII data from advanced sensors shall be in a .csv or HDF5 that can be imported directly into UX-Analyze (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; final, processed, advanced sensor data shall be delivered in Geosoft databases that can be opened and viewed using UX-Analyze (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; inversion results (if calculated) shall be delivered in Geosoft database(s) that can be opened and viewed using UX-Analyze Version (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; DGM performance requirements established during the project planning and specified in Worksheet 22 of the UFP-QAPP shall take precedence over performance requirements in Tables 11-3 through 11-6 of EM 200-1-15. Contractor shall provide an appropriate data delivery system (sharepoint, external hard drives, etc.) to deliver all interim and final electronic data.

3.5.2.5.1.2 The contractor shall employ the Geophysical Systems Verification (GSV) concept in accordance with “A Physics-Based Alternative to Geophysical Prove outs for Munitions Response, Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), July 2009” and install an Instrument Verifications Strip (IVS) using anomaly avoidance techniques, test their system(s) and write an IVS Report for review by the USACE and Stakeholders. An IVS Memorandum will be received by the USACE within one week of the IVS’s installation and equipment verification for review by the USACE Geophysics personnel. All data will be included with the submittal of the IVS Memorandum for review by the USACE and Stakeholders. This report will be issued as a Draft, Draft Final and Final document with the stakeholders being issued the Draft Final, upon USACE Approval, for review and comments. All detection data collection shall be at risk to the contractor without concurrence on the IVS Memorandum results by USACE.

3.5.2.5.1.3 As part of the QC requirements for GSV, the contractor shall install blind seeds. All seed locations shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor with locations having centimeter accuracy. Placement of seeds shall be at variable depths and orientations but no deeper than can be reliably detected using advanced EMI sensors. Seeds will be placed in sufficient quantity to meet all requirements of the UFP-QAPP and with a density of no less than 1 seed per system per day of planned data collection. The Contractor shall keep all knowledge of quality control seeds blind from the data collection and processing teams until after all anomaly excavation activities are complete. The

Contractor shall submit for review and acceptance the blind seed firewall plan. The contractor shall submit to USACE the final seed location database as a separate deliverable prior to the start of detection data collection.

3.5.2.5.1.4 All ground truth shall be firewalled from all contractor personnel performing any aspect of the geophysical analysis, geophysical field activities, or anomaly excavation and identification activities. No seed item ground truth shall be provided to the contractor's project personnel except as provided by the contractor's QC Geophysicist in performing root-cause analysis. Ground truth may be provided by the Government, at the Government's discretion, when reporting a QA failure. The contractor shall provide a firewall plan that assures all seeding information cannot be viewed or otherwise obtained by, or made available to any contractor personnel except the QC Geophysicist.

3.5.2.5.2 Perform Evaluation of Geophysical Survey Results. Contractor will perform processing and analysis of the geophysical data after the activities begin and provide all data to USACE, including the written processes used to filter the data. The contractor will then create an investigation dig list and submit it to the USACE QA Geophysicist for review. The Contractor shall incorporate layers that overlay on maps of the site that identify physical features, MEC and MD and other clutter found during the field work. Examples include: streets, anomalies, MEC, TOI that are discovered to be MD, identifiable MD, non-TOI found during ground truth or verification procedures, sampling location, cultural resources, environmental, biological, and socio-economic variables.

3.6 Optional Task 6, One (1) Week of Validation Blind Seeding for AGC.

3.6.1 Objective: Implement the blind seeding plan defined by the Government. All seeds shall be emplaced only after the area has been checked by a qualified UXO Technician to determine if the area is free of subsurface anomalies. These seeds are for validation/QA purposes and are in additional to any QC seeds utilized by the contractor.

3.6.2 Performance Standard:

- Seed…