About this file

Amendment 0001

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
18Q0060_0001_Pricing.pdf PDF
W912DW18Q0060_Q_and_A.txt TXT text file
18Q0060.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment is to add description and quantity to the CLINs for clarity and to extend the solicitation to Wednesday, 15 August 2018, 12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW18Q0060

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Jul-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Aug-2018

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW18Q0060

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 02-Aug-2018 02:00 PM to 15-Aug-2018 12:00 PM.

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

As prescribed in the PWS, the contractor shall provide phytoplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.

To:

Base Year: As prescribed in the PWS in section 5.3 Task 2 Zooplankton , the contractor shall provide phytoplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.Phytoplankton Identification to species, Density,Biovolume120 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________Toxic Algae Identification to species, Density,Biovolume10 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________ Total $ ___________

CLIN 0002

As prescribed in the PWS, the contractor shall provide zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud

Base Year: As prescribed in the PWS in section 5.3 Task 2 , the contractor shall provide zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.Zooplankton Identification to species, Density,Biovolume90 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________

CLIN 1001

As prescribed in the PWS, the contractor shall provide phytoplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud

Option Year 1: As prescribed in the PWS in section 5.3 Task 2 Zooplankton , the contractor shall provide phytoplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.Phytoplankton Identification to species, Density,Biovolume120 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________Toxic Algae Identification to species, Density,Biovolume10 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________

CLIN 1002

As prescribed in the PWS, the contractor shall provide zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud

Option Year 1: As prescribed in the PWS in section 5.3 Task 2 , the contractor shall provide zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.Zooplankton Identification to species, Density,Biovolume90 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________

CLIN 2001

As prescribed in the PWS, the contractor shall provide phytoplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud

Option Year 2: As prescribed in the PWS in section 5.3 Task 2 Zooplankton , the contractor shall provide phytoplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.Phytoplankton Identification to species, Density,Biovolume120 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________Toxic Algae Identification to species, Density,Biovolume10 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________

CLIN 2002

As prescribed in the PWS, the contractor shall provide zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud

Option Year 2: As prescribed in the PWS in section 5.3 Task 2 , the contractor shall provide zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.Zooplankton Identification to species, Density,Biovolume90 samples x $________ per sample = $ ___________ Grand Total Quote $

The following have been modified:

PWS

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

Amendment 0001 changes in Red

Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Analytical Services for the Seattle District Water Management Water Quality Sampling Program

1. GENERAL: This is a non-personal services contract to provide water quality analytical services. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform water quality analytical services as defined in this Performance Work Statement except for those items specified as government furnished property and services.

The contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.

1.2 Background: The Seattle District Corps of Engineers collects phytoplankton and zooplankton samples in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam from March through December. These samples are being collected as part of the water quality sampling program at Chief Joseph, Libby, Albeni Falls, Howard Hanson, and Mud Mountain dams.

1.3 Objectives: The laboratory will provide the following services:

Phytoplankton Identification Phytoplankton Density Phytoplankton Bio-volume Estimate Toxic Algae Identification, Density, Biovolume Zooplankton Identification Zooplankton Density.

1.4 Scope: This scope of work is for phytoplankton and zooplankton analytical services for samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam. The services provided under this contract are presented in detail in Part 5-Specific Tasks.

1.5 Period of Performance: The period of performance shall be for one (1) Base Year Period of __ 12 months and two (2) 12-month option years periods. The period of performance reads as follows:

Base Year: Date of Award – 31 July 2019 Option Year I: 1 Aug 2019 – 31 July 2020 Option Year II: 1 Aug 2020 – 31 July 2021

1.6 General Information

1.6.1 Quality Control: The contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The contractor’s quality control program is the means by which they assure that the work complies with the requirement of the contract. The contractor shall perform the following quality control on all samples delivered to the laboratory:

Chain of custody check of samples (missing samples) Check condition of samples (preserved and in good condition) Methods are fully documented, validated, and repeatable All equipment used is suited to the purpose, correctly maintained, with maintenance records kept Sample analysis conducted by trained personnel with taxonomic expertise.

1.6.2 Quality Assurance: The government shall evaluate the contractor’s quality control procedures and performance under this contract.

1.6.3 Recognized Holidays: (Not Applicable).

1.6.4 Hours of Operation: (Not Applicable).

1.6.5 Place of Performance: The work to be performed under this contract will be performed at the contractor’s facility.

1.6.6 Type of Contract: The government will award a fixed service contract.

1.6.7 Security Requirements:

1.6.7.1 Security: The Contractor must pre-screen Candidates using the E-verify Program (http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify) website to meet the established employment eligibility requirements. The Vendor must ensure that the Candidate has two valid forms of Government issued identification prior to enrollment to ensure the correct information is entered into the E-verify system. An initial list of verified/eligible Candidates must be provided to the COR no later than 3 business days after the initial contract award.

1.6.7.2 Physical Security: (Not Applicable).

1.6.7.3 Key Control: (Not Applicable).

1.6.7.4 Lock Combinations: (Not Applicable).

1.6.8 Special Qualifications: (Not Applicable).

1.6.9 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings: (Not Applicable)

1.6.10 Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The (COR) will be identified by separate letter. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract: perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance: maintain written and oral communications with the Contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract: issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications: monitor Contractor's performance and notifies both the Contracting Officer and Contractor of any deficiencies:

coordinate availability of government furnished property, and provide site entry of Contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the Contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.

1.6.11 Key Personnel: (Not Applicable).

1.6.12 Identification of Contractor Employees: (Not Applicable).

1.6.13 Contractor Travel: Not Applicable:

1.6.14 Other Direct Costs: (Not Applicable):

1.6.15 Data Rights: (Not Applicable):

1.6.16 Organizational Conflict of Interest: (Not Applicable).

1.6.17 PHASE IN /PHASE OUT PERIOD: (Not Applicable):

PART 2

DEFINITIONS & ACRONYMS

2. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS:

2.1. DEFINITIONS: [].

2.1.1. CONTRACTOR. A supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or service to the government. The term used in this contract refers to the prime.

2.1.2. CONTRACTING OFFICER. A person with authority to enter into, administer, and or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the government.

Note: The only individual who can legally bind the government.

2.1.3. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). An employee of the U.S.

Government appointed by the contracting officer to administer the contract. Such appointment shall be in writing and shall state the scope of authority and limitations. This individual has authority to provide technical direction to the Contractor as long as that direction is within the scope of the contract, does not constitute a change, and has no funding implications. This individual does NOT have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.

2.1.4. DEFECTIVE SERVICE. A service output that does not meet the standard of performance associated with the Performance Work Statement.

2.1.5. DELIVERABLE. Anything that can be physically delivered, but may include non-manufactured things such as meeting minutes or reports.

2.1.6. KEY PERSONNEL. Contractor personnel that are evaluated in a source selection process and that may be required to be used in the performance of a contract by the Key Personnel listed in the PWS. When key personnel are used as an evaluation factor in best value procurement, an offer can be rejected if it does not have a firm commitment from the persons that are listed in the proposal.

2.1.7. PHYSICAL SECURITY. Actions that prevent the loss or damage of Government property.

2.1.8. QUALITY ASSURANCE. The government procedures to verify that services being performed by the Contractor are performed according to acceptable standards.

2.1.9. QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP). An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance.

2.1.10. QUALITY CONTROL. All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to assure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements.

2.1.11. SUBCONTRACTOR. One that enters into a contract with a prime contractor. The Government does not have privity of contract with the subcontractor.

2.1.12. WORK DAY. The number of hours per day the Contractor provides services in accordance with the contract.

2.1.12. WORK WEEK. Monday through Friday, unless specified otherwise.

2.2. ACRONYMS: [].

ACOR Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative AFARS Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement AR Army Regulation CCE Contracting Center of Excellence CFR Code of Federal Regulations CONUS Continental United States (excludes Alaska and Hawaii) COR Contracting Officer Representative COTR Contracting Officer's Technical Representative COTS Commercial-Off-the-Shelf DA Department of the Army DD250 Department of Defense Form 250 (Receiving Report) DD254 Department of Defense Contract Security Requirement List DFARS Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement DMDC Defense Manpower Data Center DOD Department of Defense FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 KO Contracting Officer OCI Organizational Conflict of Interest OCONUS Outside Continental United States (includes Alaska and Hawaii) ODC Other Direct Costs PIPO Phase In/Phase Out POC Point of Contact PRS Performance Requirements Summary PWS Performance Work Statement QA Quality Assurance QAP Quality Assurance Program QASP Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan QC Quality Control QCP Quality Control Program TE Technical Exhibit

PART 3

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES

3. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES:

3.1. Services: (Not Applicable):

3.2 Facilities: (Not Applicable):

3.3 Utilities: (Not Applicable):

3.4 Equipment: (Not Applicable):

3.5 Materials: (Not Applicable):

PART 4

CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES

4. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

4.1 General: The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to perform work under this contract that are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

4.2 Secret Facility Clearance: (Not Applicable):

4.3. Materials: The Contractor shall provide the following materials:

The laboratory will provide the Seattle District with sample containers containing preservative for the required analysis.

4.4. Equipment: (Not Applicable).

PART 5

SPECIFIC TASKS

5. Specific Tasks:

5.1. Basic Services. The contractor shall provide phytoplankton and zooplankton analytical services for water samples collected by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers in the Columbia River and Lake Rufus Woods at Chief Joseph Dam, in the Kootenai River and Lake Koocanusa at Libby Dam, in the Pend Oreille River and Lake Pend Oreille at Albeni Falls Dam, in the Green River and Eagle Gorge Reservoir at Howard Hanson Dam, and in the White River at Mud Mountain Dam.

5.2. Task 1 Phytoplankton Analytical Services for Chief Joseph Dam, Libby Dam, Albeni Falls Dam, Howard Hanson Dam, and Mud Mountain Dam:

The Seattle District Corps of Engineers will collect phytoplankton samples monthly at up to 12 stations during each contract award performance period. The total number of samples requiring phytoplankton analysis shall not exceed 120 samples. Phytoplankton (both soft cell and diatoms) will be identified to species or the lowest practical level, and density and biovolume calculated. A minimum biological count of at least 300 shall be performed on all samples to provide the necessary phytoplankton taxonomic identification, density and biovolume calculations. In addition, up to 10 samples will be collected for toxic algae identification, density and biovolume. These toxic algae samples shall be rush samples with data required within 48 hours of delivery. Phytoplankton analysis and the total number of samples to be analyzed are presented below.

The laboratory will provide the following analysis on 120 phytoplankton samples:

Phytoplankton ID to species or lowest practical level, Phytoplankton density, Phytoplankton biovolume

Phytoplankton Identification to species 120 Samples Phytoplankton Density 120 Samples Phytoplankton Biovolume 120 Samples Toxic Algae Identification to species, Density, Biovolume 10 Samples.

The laboratory will provide the following analysis on 10 Toxic Algae samples:

Toxic algae identification to species, Toxic algae density, Toxic algae biovolume

The laboratory will provide the following services:

The laboratory will provide the Seattle District with sample containers containing preservative for the required analysis.

The laboratory will follow standard chain-of-custody procedures.

The laboratory will report the phytoplankton analytical results to the

Seattle District within a standard turnaround time of about 90 days (dependent on the total number of samples received).

The laboratory will report the toxic algae rush analytical results to the Seattle District within the rush turnaround time of 48 hours.

5.3. Task 2 Zooplankton Analytical Services for Chief Joseph Dam, Libby Dam, Albeni Falls Dam, Howard Hanson Dam, and Mud Mountain Dam:

The Seattle District Corps of Engineers will collect zooplankton samples monthly at up to 12 stations during each contract award performance period. The total number of samples requiring zooplankton analysis shall not exceed 90 samples. Zooplankton will be identified to the lowest practical level, generally genus/species. A minimum count of at least 200 total zooplankton organisms per sample shall be performed on all samples to provide the necessary zooplankton taxonomic identification and density calculations. Zooplankton analysis and the total number of samples to be analyzed are presented below.

The laboratory will provide the following analysis on 90 zooplankton samples:

Zooplankton identification to genus/species Zooplankton density

The laboratory will provide the following analysis:

Zooplankton Identification to genus/species 90 Samples Zooplankton Density 90 Samples

The laboratory will provide the following services:

The laboratory will provide the Seattle District with sample containers containing preservative for the required analysis.

The laboratory will follow standard chain-of-custody procedures.

The laboratory will report the zooplankton analytical results to the Seattle District within a standard turnaround time of about 90 days (dependent on the total number of samples received).

5.3. Task 3 Deliverables:

The laboratory will provide the following deliverable format:

A case narrative outlining the condition of the samples received, any difficulties encountered in processing the samples, and corrective actions.

Chain of Custody documentation.

A data summary included a tabular listing of phytoplankton identification, density, and bio-volume calculations.

A data summary included a tabular listing of zooplankton identification and density calculations.

The laboratory will report the analytical results to the Seattle District within the standard turnaround time of about 90 days (dependent on total number of samples received).

The laboratory will report the toxic algae rush analytical results to the Seattle District within the rush turnaround time of 48 hours.

5.4. CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT REPORTING (CMR) (Not Applicable):

PART 6

APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS

6. APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS (CURRENT EDITIONS) (Not Applicable):

PART 7

ATTACHMENT/TECHNICAL EXHIBIT LISTING

7. Attachment/Technical Exhibit List:

7.1. Attachment 1/Technical Exhibit 1 – Performance Requirements Summary

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1

Performance Requirements Summary The contractor service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.

Performance Objective

Standard PERFORMANCE

THRESHOLD

Method of Surveillance

PRS # 1.

The laboratory shall provide a data summary including tabular listing of

(1) phytoplankton identification to species (when practicable), density and bio-volume calculations, and (2) zooplankton identification to species (when practicable) and density calculations

The contractor provided data that met or exceeded ID to species (when practicable), density and bio-volume calculations.

Meet Standard Performance will be evaluated by review of laboratory results data report.

PRS # 2

Analytical results shall be provided within 90 days of sample receipt. Toxic algae rush analytical results shall be provided within 48 hours of sample receipt.

The laboratory results data report shall be received by the Corps’ technical POC within 90 days of sample receipt.

Laboratory toxic algae results data report received within 48 hours of sample receipt.

Meet Standard with one week leeway. Toxic algae standard with 24 hour leeway.

Performance will be evaluated by receipt and review of the laboratory results data report

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it.