A.07.24_W912DR18B0007_0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to change the offeror acceptance period from 180 calendar days to 90 calendar days and to respond to Requests for Information (RFIs).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 31-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DR18B0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-Jul-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31-Aug-2018

CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE

2 HOPKINS PLAZA

ROOM 03-G-01

BALTIMORE MD 21201

W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DR18B0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The offeror acceptance period has decreased by 90 from 180 to 90.

(End of Summary of Changes)

ATTACHMENT:

REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Fort Myer - Arlington National Cemetery, Perimeter Security Fence Review: Fort Myer - Arlington National Cemetery, Perimeter (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 24 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

7598314 Contracting Solicitation Page 12 52.204-8

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the project is unrestricted as indicated in Item 10 on page 2, the prime bidders are to be registered in SAM under NAICS code 238990 as indicted in 52.204-8 (a)(1) and the $15,000,000 small business standard for that NAICS code listed in 52.204-8 (2) of the solicitation pertains to subcontractors.

On: Aug 07 2018.

Government Response. . This project is advertised as unrestricted under NAICS Code 238990 with a size standard of $15,000,000. The apparent low (prime contractor) bidder must be registered in SAM under NAICS code 238990 in order to be eligible for award. On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7602521 Electrical

ES102, ES103, ES108,

ES109

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Notes state Dominion Power will furnish and install the new light fixtures and relocate others and further states the work is to be funded by this project. Is the Owner paying Dominion directly or is this the General Contractor's responsibility? If it's the Contractor's responsibility please provide a cost for this work to include in our bid.

On: Aug 09 2018.

Government Response. . The new light fixtures and relocating existing light fixtures are not the contractor's responsibility, and not a solicitation requirement. On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7605428 Electrical

CS104, CS101, CS102,

CS502,

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: Drawing CS104

1) Please provide a detail for milling and overlay shown on drawing CS104.

2) Please provide a detail for all hitching posts that need to be relocated and installed with new foundations, per note 17 on drawing C104.

3) Please provide a quantity for all hitching posts. It is unclear how many are required.

Reference: Drawing CS101, Note 1

1) Please provide a detail for the new chain link fence per note 1 on drawing CS101.

Reference: Drawing CS102

2) Note 11 on drawing CS102 states to see sheet CS502 for segmental retaining wall notes and details. However drawing CS506 states to see civil drawings for exposed wall height. Nothing on the civil drawings show the exposed height of the wall. To determine the height and the quantity of the segmental wall we need the following;

• Please provide us the existing and proposed contour or grading plan around proposed Segmental Wall.

• Please provide us the height of the proposed Segmental Wall.

Reference: Drawing ES101 to ES108, CS506 and ES501

Please confirm that all electrical ductbank shown from Drawing ES101 thru ES108 are to be installed per drawing ES-501 detail 1 and 2 and drawing CS506 (4-2" PVC conduit and 2-4" Galvanized Rigid Steel) not per drawing ES- 501 detail 3 (4-2" PVC conduit).

On: Aug 10 2018.

Government Response. . This information will be provided via amendment on or about 8/24/2018. On:

Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7609049 Architectural CS-507 32-31-13.90

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Written specs #32-31-13.90 describes fence using "corrugated steel pale fence pickets...basis of design Ameristar, Impsasse - Trident-style." However details on drawing CS-507 show fence panels w/ 3/4" square pickets w/ blunt picket tops. These are 2 completely different styles of fence...please clarify if written specs or drawing details are correct.

On: Aug 14 2018.

Government Response. . This information was provided via amendment 0002 to the solicitation. On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7611076 Contracting 6-7, 10 N/A Subcontracting Goals

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Which Subcontracting Goals should we aspire to attain? Reference Page 6-7 and 10. One lists the MBE/WBE Goals and another lists more specific DBE's.

(Attachment: ProjNet_Inquiry_8-15-2018.pdf) On: Aug 15 2018.

Government Response. . Provision 52.222-23 referenced on page 6-7 applies to the aggregate workforce as opposed to the subcontracting goals which are referenced on page 10. The contractor shall make a good faith effort to reach the minority and female goals in the covered work area. The apparent low bidder shall also make a good faith effort to obtain the subcontracting goals identified in the solicitation upon request and prior to award. On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7613774 Other Solicitation Page 12

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We would like to request an addition site visit to bring subcontractors in to see the areas.

On: Aug 16 2018.

Government Response. . No additional site visits will be provided. On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618155 Construction Management VF101

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

During the site walk, it was noted that fall protection on the existing concrete retaining wall to the north of the Millennium project will be required in accordance with Section 21 of EM 385-1-1. Please advise if we will be permitted to attach to the existing concrete retaining wall for this purpose.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . No, you will not be permitted to attach to the existing concrete retaining wall for this purpose. On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618168 Site CD103 Note 11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the gas line relocation (Note 11 CD103) require a Washington Gas-certified contractor to perform the work?

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . No, but contractor shall be required to follow Washington Gas (WG) requirements, as well as WG construction guidelines. On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618172 Site GC401

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Drawing GC401 shows construction fencing required for work in the Old Post Chapel lot, but none is shown for the Henderson Hall lot. Please advise if construction fencing is required to protect the public at the Henderson Hall lot.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . Refer to Amendment 0004 posted on 8/29/18. On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618181 Electrical ES104 Note 2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Note 2 on ES104 states to route 2-2" conduits into the OPC Building. The drawing also references Detail 3/ES501 in this location, which shows 4-2" conduits. Please clarify.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . Additional information will be provided via amendment on or about 8/24/18. On:

Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618184 Site CU506

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

CU506 references pervious concrete, which cannot be found in the drawings. Is pervious concrete required anywhere on this project?

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . CU506 references permeable pavement. This project has both Porous Asphalt (Jogging Path), and Permeable Pavers (Old Post Chapel Parking Lot). On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618187 Electrical ES105 Note 5

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm if Note 5 on ES105 is intended to relocate the existing hand hole to the north. If not, please provide more clarity for the intent of this note.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . Sheet will be revised in Amendment 0004 to be posted on 8/29/18. On: Aug 29

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618189 Electrical ES-series

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

All ductbank section cuts throughout the ES-series drawings are shown as detail 3/ES501. Please confirm if all ductbanks are to follow this composition, or if detail 1 or 2 is used anywhere. Specifically ES103 indicates to use detail 3/ES501 beneath a roadway.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . Ductbank on sheets ES101 through 108 will be installed per ES-501 detail 1 when underneath pavement, detail 2 when underneath turf, or detail 3 when specified by the callout note (bubble with cross sectional arrow). On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618199 Antiterrorism-Force Protection section 34 73 13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The spec call out for k-12 crash rated gates. When the crash test are done they are normally done on much smaller gates than you are requiring. As I understand the size of the tested gates are the maximum size that cam be installed to meet the DOS certification without addition engineering .

This being the case can a crash gate that has been engineered by a Virginia licensed structural engineer specializing in crash rated equipment be used to design a site specific crash gate system for your gates as has been done at other local facilities?

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . The crash rated gate and manufacturer choice must be included in the latest edition of "The DOD Anti-Ram Vehicle Barrier List" as noted on sheet CS508. On: Aug 22 2018

Government Response. . The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

Please disregard the initial reply and see upcoming amendment. On: Aug 24 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618202 Antiterrorism-Force Protection section 32 31 13.90

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the new fence have a crash rated cable system to match the adjacent gates ratings. If so can a engineered crash rated system that has been approved by the Corp of engineer at other army bases be used?

The specs reference Ameristar as the manufacture of the impasse with corrugated pales be used as pickets on the fence panels.

This is a sole source product where the pickets are bolted on as described.

The pickets can be pulled off by wedging a 2x4 between two pickets and applying minimal pressure breaking the bolts giving access to the secured side.

Can a fence panel be used that has 2" horizontal rails with 1" square pickets that are inserted into punched holes of the 2" to prevent the easy removal of the pickets which has a 4" spacing between the heavy pickets?

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . The security fence is not required to be crash rated.

The Contractor can choose an approved equal fence and manufacturer.

The fence is now modeled after the Montage II Genesis. Per amendment dated 8-09-19. On: Aug 22 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618278 Construction Management 01 14 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 14 00 - 1.3.3 states that work at OPC and MC will only be permitted after 4:00 p.m. At the 8/14 site walk, it was stated that work may be performed during normal working hours, 7:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., for 60-90 days at these locations. Please clarify.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . Refer to Amendment 0004 posted on 8/29/18. On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7618281 Construction Management All

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please advise if the drawings need to be submitted to VA DEQ for approval.

On: Aug 20 2018.

Government Response. . USACE design team is providing SWM and E&S drawings and calculations to VADEQ for approval. On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7620279 Antiterrorism-Force Protection CS507 CS507

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please reference ornamental fencing shown on drawing CS507:

1. Detail in the lower left corner of the drawing with concrete under the fence; in order to do this you would need a fence taller than 8'h. The max height of the Ameristar Montage is only 8'h which would mean that the top of the fence couldn't maintain a level appearance as shown.

2. Detail in the lower right corner of the drawing showing transitioning fence from ground level to the concrete retaining wall. The Ameristar Montage bottom rail cannot be adjusted to follow the slope.

3. Detail above the detail mentioned in question #2 showing stepping fence onto existing wall. We would have to double stack two Montage panels at this area.

4. If the Ameristar Aegis II Fence panels were used only in these areas listed above, only then would you achieve the look shown on the details – is this acceptable?

On: Aug 21 2018.

Government Response. . Refer to Amendment 0004 posted on 8/29/18. On: Aug 29 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7633670 Specifications 34-73-13 (1.1 & 2.2)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We have had difficulty locating the crash gates at the required opening size that meets the M50-P1 rating as listed in the specs. Is it ok to use a gate manufacturer that is not listed on the DOD Anti-Ram list, but meets the requirements and standards? If not could you please provide a specific vendor/manufacturer that meets all required specs that we can contact for pricing?

On: Aug 28 2018.

Government Response. . See Amendment #003 on revisions to specification 34 73 13. Basis of design is Tymetal Corp, Model TCG-12 Cantilevered Slide Gate. On: Aug 31 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7633707 Materials CS507

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

There is a conflicting reference in specs and drawings to use 6" end/corner/pull decorative fence posts. Is it acceptable to use 3" posts for decorative fence and 6" posts for double-drive gates?

On: Aug 28 2018.

Government Response. . No conflict observed. Corner, end, and pull posts will be 6" square posts. All other posts will be 3" square posts unless otherwise detailed. On: Aug 31 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7633844 Specifications 32-31-13

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How many walk-gates are needed in the approx 10,000 LF of fence? Is there a distance between gates that needs to be met?

On: Aug 28 2018.

Government Response. . There are no walk gates. Maintenance gate locations are shown on the drawings. On: Aug 31 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7634636 Civil CSW507

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

CSW507 Fence Elevation Detail states that corner end and pole post are 6" square and all other posts are 3".

Additionally, spec section 32 311390 2.2.1 fence posts are 3" and gate end post and pole posts are 6". Are all posts 6" or 3"? Footing size for posts for 3" will be 18" diameter by 42" deep and 6" posts footing diameter will be 24" x 42" deep. Post embedment is 36. We need to confirm post size and footings.

On: Aug 29 2018.

Government Response. . Corner, end, and pull posts will be 6" square posts as shown on sheet CS507.

All other posts will be 3" square posts unless otherwise detailed. On: Aug 31 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7636388 General Notes to Offerors

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Due to the current market volatility in materials pricing and skilled labor shortages, it does not seem fair and reasonable for contractors to hold Base Bid pricing valid for 180 days and Option 1 pricing valid for an additional 270 days. Please reconsider the length of time that pricing must be held valid.

On: Aug 30 2018.

Government Response. . Offers providing less than 180 calendar days will be changed to 90 calendar days for the Government acceptance. However, the time stated to exercise the option will remain at 270 calendar days after contract award. On: Aug 31 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7636767 Civil K-12 crash gates

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please list acceptable manufacturers for the K-12 crash gates that meet the necessary specifications.

On: Aug 30 2018.

Government Response. . See Amendment #003 on revisions to specification 34 73 13. Basis of design is Tymetal Corp, Model TCG-12 Cantilevered Slide Gate. On: Aug 31 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.