W921DQ26RA061 P00001 Amendment 1.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

J 1 4

0001 12 AUG 2026 PANNWD-26-P-0000 029097

W912DQ

W071 ENDIST KANSAS CITY

CONTRACTING DIV CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 601 E 12TH ST

KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2896

UNITED STATES

DALE COLEMAN, EMAIL: DALE.E.COLEMAN@USACE.ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: (816)

389-3500

SCD: PAS:

W912DQ26RA061

17 JUL 2026

SEE SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

See Schedule

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The SOLICITATION is amended as follows:Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

1. CONTRACT

a. DFARS Clause 252.204-7025 Notice of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements has been deleted in its entirety.

b. Section II, Specification 00 21 16, Evaluation of Performance Confidence, Relevancy was amended: See Relevancy Factor Amendment P00001document (attached)

c. Appendix A Performance Assessment has been added in its entirety.

2. Wage Determination KS20260049 Rev 1, dated May 18, 2026, remains unchanged and is located at www.SAM.gov.

3. Proposal Due Date of August 17, 2026 at 12:00 p.m. CDT remains unchanged.

4. Offeror is required to acknowledge receipt of this amendment. Failure to acknowledge all amendments may cause rejection of the proposal.

Section 00 01 15 - List of Drawing Sheets

The attachments table has changed from:

To:

The following contract documents were added:

The following contract documents Page Counts were changed:

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

The following clauses were deleted:

NOTICE OF CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENTS

(NOV 2025)

(a) . As used in this provision, "controlled unclassified information (CUI)," "current," "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) status," "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification unique identifier (CMMC UID)," "Federal contract information (FCI)", and "plan of action and milestones" have the meaning given in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 252.204-7021, Contractor Compliance With the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements, clause of this solicitation.

(b)(1) . The CMMC level required by this solicitation is: PM Please establish required level

. This CMMC level, or higher (see 32 CFR part 170), is required prior to award for each contractor information system that will process, store, or transmit Federal contract information (FCI) or controlled unclassified information (CUI) during performance of the contract.

(2) The Offeror will not be eligible for award of a contract, task order, or delivery order resulting from this solicitation if the Offeror does not have, for each of the contractor information systems that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI and that will be used in performance of a contract resulting from this solicitation-

(i) The current CMMC status entered in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) ( ) at the CMMC level required by paragraph (b)(1) of this provision; and

(ii) A current affirmation of continuous compliance with the security requirements identified at 32 CFR part 170 in SPRS.

(c) . If the Offeror has a CMMC Status of Conditional, the Offeror shall successfully close out a valid plan of action and milestones (32 CFR 170.21) to achieve a CMMC Status of Final.

(d) . The Offeror shall provide, in the proposal, the CMMC unique identifier(s) (CMMC UIDs) issued by SPRS for each contractor information system that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI during performance of a contract, task order, or delivery order resulting from this solicitation. The Offeror also shall update the list when new CMMC UIDs are generated in SPRS. The CMMC UIDs are provided in SPRS after the Offeror enters the results of self-assessment(s) for each such information system.

(End of provision)

Text to be removed is noted with red font and an underline. Text to be added will be noted with green text in italics.

potential increased risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A summary chart that shows which relevant features have been met for each project will not be considered sufficient for demonstration of relevancy.

RECENCY

Recent means completed within the past five (5) years as of the date the solicitation was issued. Projects considered substantially complete within the same date range may also be considered.

If an offeror presents a project that is substantially complete, the proposal must include an explanation of why that project should be considered. "Substantially Complete" is defined as the stage at which the project is sufficiently complete in accordance with the contract documents so that the end user can occupy it and use it for its intended purpose.

With respect to recency, more recent project performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the performance confidence assessment than less recent project performance.

RELEVANCY

Relevant projects are projects of the same, or close to the same scope, size, magnitude, and complexity to the solicited project. The Projects submitted shall demonstrate (either individually or in combination thereof) all of the following project types:

At least three (3) projects must demonstrate experience from the Offeror as the Prime contractor. Two (2) projects must demonstrate experience from the contractor responsible for the construction of multi-story tower structures.

a. Projects valued at $20,000,000 (present day value) or more. or greater (present day value utilizing a yearly 3.5% escalation factor) for each project.

b. Projects demonstrating experience working with DOD criteria and Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS).

c. Design-Bid-Build construction of an ATC Tower or similar structure of 10 stories or more serving as the prime contractor.

d. Working on or near an active airfield and adhering to FAA and Army regulations.

e. Demolition of towers or similar structures.

The more relevant a submitted project is to this requirement the more consideration given for this factor (i.e. The more demonstrated experiences in a single project). More relevant project performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the performance confidence assessment than project performance of less relevancy.

Each submitted project will be assigned one of the levels of relevancy shown in Table 4.

APPENDIX C

Performance Assessment

SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER FPR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

[COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

Sample of cover letter to be sent by the offeror to its references

Name and Address of Reference: Date:

Dear :

We have listed your firm as a reference for work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal for a project advertised by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Kansas City District. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), an response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process.

Your firm has been listed as a reference for the work we performed for you on the following project: (List the project here)

We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible.

Furthermore, a questionnaire has also been sent to ( ) of your organization. Only one response from each company is required. If at all possible, we suggest that you individually answer this questionnaire and then coordinate your responses with that of ( ), to forge a consensus on one overall response from your organization. It is preferred that you return your questionnaire to our office; however you may also send your completed questionnaire directly to USACE at email address dale.e.coleman@usace.army.mil and stephanie.r.kretzer@usace.army.mil.

We request your questionnaire be provided by the proposal due date of August 17, 2026.

If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Dale Coleman, USACE Contract Specialist, at (816) 389-3500.

Sincerely, Attachments:

1. Instructions to the Reference for completing the Past Performance Questionnaire

2. Past Performance Questionnaire

TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CLIENT

Contractor Information (Firm name):

Client Information (Name):

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the Contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by Contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

YES NO

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

YES NO

f) Have there been any indications that the Contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

YES NO

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the Contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

YES NO

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this Contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):