W912CN-16-R-0006_Conformed_as_of_Amend_0004.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

W912CN-16-R-0006 02-Sep-2016

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

808.656.0986

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

10:00 AM 17 Oct 2016

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA X ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

W912CN9. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

ANNABELLE F. MILLER

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

EXPEDITIONARY CONTRACTING COMMAND

413TH CSB, RCO-HAWAII,

742 SANTOS DUMONT AVENUE

BLDG 108, 3RD FLOOR (WAAF)

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS HI 96857-5026

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

FAX:

TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

X 8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$7,500,000

NAICS:

561730

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF112

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

W912CN-16-R-0006

Section SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

ADDITIONAL SITE VISIT INFO

Additional Site Visit Information

1. Meeting location and time has been changed. Attendees will meet at 0845 at the parking lot at Schofield Barracks (SB) Bldg 1150. (See attached map).

2. Training will be conducted by Range Operations before going to the sites.

3. 4 x 4 vehicles are required on ranges.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Questions and Answers Range Grounds Maintenance

1. Question: Is this a follow-on requirement? If so, who is the incumbent?

Response: This is a new DPW contract. It is a combination of several requirements some of which were performed under contracts issued by another agency. Contracts awarded by RCO-HI were issued to REK Associates LLC, Nugate Group LLC.

2. Question: Request extension of the solicitation closing date by two weeks.

Response: See Amendment 0004.

3. Will revised drawings/maps depicting actual Areas of Responsibility be provided for all areas?

Response: Yes. See revised Exhibits.

4. Question: Will the Government revise “from center of road ten feet out on both sides” to “ten feet from outer edge of both sides” on all roads? Also please confirm that only grass cutting is required and not tree trimming or clearing of sides of the roads.

Response: No. “center of road ten feet out on both sides” remains. See revised PWS.

5. Question: CLIN 0001 SBMR PWS Para 3.1 Specify cutback height of brush, especially for those instances where there is overhanging brush or small trees.

Response: See revised PWS. Paragraph re-numbered to 3.2.

6. Question: Will the Government consider increasing frequency of the cuts considering range accessibility, constant training schedule changes?

Response: See revised TE #4, pricing sheet and SF1449.

7. Question: Will a 2nd DZ be included in updated drawings?

Response: Yes. See revised PWS.

8. Question: Will frequency of cuts be revised (suggest 6X per year) due to DZ height requirements?

Response: Yes. See revised PWS.

9. Question: CLIN 0003 Drum Road/Poamoho Bypass PWS Para 3.4 Nearly 75% of the road has heavy overhang. Would the Government add cutback and height requirement in these areas?

Response: Yes. See revised PWS.

10. Question: Firing ranges or training grounds are very schedule sensitive. How accessible will this bypass road be i.e., daily, monthly, semi-annual, pre-scheduled, etc?

Response: The range has a monthly stand down time for maintenance. Contractor will work with range control for scheduled maintenance.

11. Question: There seems to be a discrepancy in the number of acres (19 miles = 27 acres). Please review.

19 miles x 20 ft (10 ft out on both sides) should be 46 acres. See computation below.

19 miles x 5,280 LF (mile) – 100,320 LF 100, 320 LF x 20 FT (width) – 2,006,400 SF 2,006,400 SF / 43,560 SF (acre) – 46.06 acres

46.06 acres x 2 services = 92 acres

Response: See revised TE #4.

12. Question: CLIN 0005 Kahuku Training Area (KTA) Drop Zone PWS Para 3.5. Would the Government consider increasing the frequency of cuts to six times per year due to DZ height requirements?

Response: See revised TE #4, pricing sheet and SF1449.

13. Question: CLIN 0008 PMR. PWS Para 3.7.15 is not included in the CLIN description. Please clarify.

Response: Paragraph added to CLIN description. See revised Schedule B of the SF1449.

14. Question: CLIN 0008 PMR. Please clarify whether the frequency of cuts is monthly or 2x per month. The total number of acres correspond to 2x cut per month. However, the description indicates monthly.

15. Question: PWS Para 3.7.15. Would the government define and revise verbiage on Para 3.7.15 to include having one monitor per crew in multiple crew situations? Also, recommend allowing “competent persons” (Government to define what would be considered as a “competent person”) as additional safety monitors when in multiple crew situations.

Response: Contractor will make that determination.

17. Question: Can we submit previously completed PPQ as part of this proposal?

Response: Yes, if the reference contract is recent and relevant.

18. Question: Does the Government anticipate awarding all CLINs upon contract award? If not, what’s the strategy?

Response: All CLINs will be included in the basic requirements contract. However, task orders will be issued depending on need and funding availability. The Government projects minimum usage of approximately 80% of the total requirement. Contractor, however, shall be prepared to meet 100% usage, if needed.

19. Question: Would the Government consider changing the submittal requirement to electronic?

Response: No.

20. Question: How does the Government want the sanitized version of the Technical volume delivered?

Response: Please refer to the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items.

21. Question: Who is responsible for repairing access to the site if the site is inaccessible due to road washout, landslide or other acts of God?

Response: Government is responsible. Contractor shall notify the COR and Range Control.

22. Question: What is the Government’s expectations around project progress in the event an act of God prevents site access?

Response: Act of God and Government delays will not be faulted against the contractor. Work will be re-scheduled if needed.

23. Question: Are there any known threatened or endangered species around these sites that we need to avoid?

Response: See PWS Para 3.8.9 – 3.8.9.3

24. Question: Are there any known archeological sites that we need to avoid?

Response: See PWS Para 3.8.9 – 3.8.9.3

25. Question: What are the specific requirements in gaining access to cultural sites related to this work?

Response: See PWS Para 3.8.9 – 3.8.9.3

26. Question: What type of herbicides will be required?

Response: See Para 7 – 7.3 of the PWS. Contractor will submit a pest plan with the chemical and target prior to use.

27. Question: What happens when portions of the road are washed out and areas to be cut are inaccessible?

Response: Contractor will notify COR and Range Control, who will advise contractor on how to proceed.

28. Question: Will the government physically delineate the cut boundary?

Response: No.

29. Question: Will UXO support be required? If so, will the expectation be that the contactor supply support or will the Army EOD support?

Response: Contractor will provide UXO support. See revised PWS.

30. Question: Is there a brush overhead height/width limit?

Response: No overhead height, but there will be a vertical height of ten (10) feet.

31. Question: Does the hoary bat pupping season affect work?

Response: No. Hoary bat pupping season only applies to trees that are 15’ feet and above.

32. Question: When working in and around cultural sensitive areas, will cultural support be required and if so, will DPW provide this support?

Response: DPW environmental will oversee work as scheduled.

33. Question: In light of the adverse weather during the site visit and the inability to visit SBMR Fire Break, SRAA, East Range and the inside of PMR, will the Government schedule another site visit to view those areas?

Response: No.

34. Question: Will the acreage per location be confirmed and/or revised?

Response: Yes. See revised TE #4.

35. Question: If/when the revisions are made, will the current names as identified and used at the Range Desk be reflected in the revised maps?

Response: Yes.

36. Question: Will high resolution maps be available?

Response: No, not at this time. High resolution printing capabilities are currently not available.

37. Question: Will a CLIN be established to be utilized for ‘Cut Requests’ for similar services outside of the current CLIN Structure or outside of the quantity, areas as defined under the PWS?

Response: No.

38. Question: Please clarify the minimum qualifications, experience and requirements for the position of “non working employee” that is tasked to provide oversight of safety and health of all employees under PWS Para 3.7.15. Does this individual(s) require any specific training or qualifications?

Response: Contractor will make that determination.

39. Question: Understanding that UXO is present on Range as mentioned in Section 6 Safety requirements, will

EOD escort be required while on Range with each Team?

Response: See revised Para 3.1.3 of the revised PWS.

40. Question: If EOD escort is required, will it be the provided by the Government or Contractor?

Response: See revised Para 3.1.3 of the revised PWS.

41. Question: If EOD escort is a contractor requirement, is there a maximum ratio of EOD Tech to Team member count?

Response: See revised Para 3.1.3 of the revised PWS.

42. Question: If EOD escort is a contractor requirement, what are the required qualifications and experiences?

Response: See revised Para 3.1.3 of the revised PWS.

43. Question: Please identify on the maps which areas are limited from herbicide application.

Response: Currently, there are only two (2) sites with archaeological requirements (PMR & DMR). These are identified on the maps.

44. Question: Is it likely that areas will be added to the current PWS?

Response: The possibility exists and it will be addressed as the need arises.

45. Question: Please identify all ‘Safety Requirements’ as mentioned under PWS Para 6.2.

Response: Paragraph 6.2 pertains to the equipment contractor is required to provide to their personnel performing the service.

46. Question: Will the Government provide all training to meet the above mentioned ‘Safety Requirements’?

Response: Training for first aid, AED, CPR is a contractor responsibility. Government will only provide training identified in PWS Para 6.1.

47. Question: Please confirm that the delivery address on Page 29/94 of the RFP supersedes the Deliver To address on the SF 1449.

Response: The delivery address on Page 29 of 94 of the RFP pertains to the submission of proposals. The

Delivery To address on the SF 1449 pertains to the contract performance requirements. These two items are separate and distinct from each other.

48. Question: If PPQs cannot be obtained because previous KOs/CORs are no longer available, will RCO-HI accept PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs?

Response: Yes, if the reference contract is recent and relevant.

49. Question: Will the successful offeror be provided a storage area at each location to secure equipment?

Response: Government will only provide storage space at PMR; none at other sites/locations.

50. Question: Please confirm that the contractor is required to provide all equipment to perform the tasks on this contract.

Response: See PWS Para 1.

51. Question: Would the Government entertain the idea of extending this contract to five (5) years?

Response: No

52. Question: Are there any additional herbicide restrictions outside of those pertaining to application on archaeological sites?

Response: No

53. Question: Please confirm that the frequencies listed in the Solicitation are correct as listed for each location

(ie. Semi-Annual at East Range).

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES ESTIMATED

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0001 1,764 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Schofield Barracks Military Reservation (SBMR) & South Range Area (SRAA) IAW Para 3.2 - 3.3.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

Frequency: Monthly FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED

NET AMT

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0002 48 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the East Range Training Area IAW Para 3.4 - 3.4.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

Frequency: Semi-annual

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0003 622.20 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the East Range Drop Zone IAW Para 3.4 - 3.4.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

Frequency: 6x per year

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0004 54 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Drum Road/Poamoho Bypass IAW Para 3.5.- 3.5.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0005 64 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Kahuku Training Area Roads IAW Para 3.6 - 3.6.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0006 396 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Kahuku Training Area (Drop Zone) IAW Para 3.6 -

3.6.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

Frequency: Quarterly

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0007 20 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Dillingham Military Reservation (DMR) IAW Para

3.7 - 3.7.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0008 68 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Dillingham Military Reservation (Open Areas) IAW Para 3.7 - 3.7.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0009 6,024 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua IAW Para 3.8 - 3.8.8; Para 3.8.10 - 3.8.13 and Para 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

Frequency: 2x per month

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0010 1,392 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua (Archaeological Sites) IAW Para 3.8.1 - 3.8.2; Para 3.8.9 - 3.8.9.3 and Para 3.8.14 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

Frequency: 2 x per month

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0011 140 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Herbicide applications at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua North/South Firebreak Road IAW Para 3.8.12.2 and Para 3.8.13.1 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0012 450 Acre PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Herbicide applications at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua Firebreak Road, 60 meter (197 ft) 75 acres IAW Para 3.8.12.2 and Para 3.8.13.1 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0013 1 Each PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Contractor Manpower Reporting IAW Para 8 of the Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1001 1,764 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Schofield Barracks Military Reservation (SBMR) & South Range Area (SRAA) IAW Para 3.2 - 3.3.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1002 48 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the East Range Training Area IAW Para 3.4 - 3.4.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1003 622.20 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the East Range Drop Zone IAW Para 3.4 - 3.4.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1004 54 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Drum Road/Poamoho Bypass IAW Para 3.5.- 3.5.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1005 64 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Kahuku Training Area Roads IAW Para 3.6 - 3.6.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1006 396 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Kahuku Training Area (Drop Zone) IAW Para 3.6 -

3.6.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1007 20 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Dillingham Military Reservation (DMR) IAW Para

3.7 - 3.7.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1008 68 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Dillingham Military Reservation (Open Areas) IAW Para 3.7 - 3.7.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1009 6,024 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua IAW Para 3.8 - 3.8.8; Para 3.8.10 - 3.8.13 and Para 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1010 1,392 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua (Archaeological Sites) IAW Para 3.8.1 - 3.8.2; Para 3.8.9 - 3.8.9.3 and Para 3.8.14 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1011 140 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Herbicide applications at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua North/South Firebreak Road IAW Para 3.8.12.2 and Para 3.8.13.1 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1012 450 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Herbicide applications at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua Firebreak Road, 60 meter (197 ft) 75 acres IAW Para 3.8.12.2 and Para 3.8.13.1 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

1013 1 Each PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Contractor Manpower Reporting IAW Para 8 of the Performance Work Statement

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2001 1,764 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Schofield Barracks Military Reservation (SBMR) & South Range Area (SRAA) IAW Para 3.2 - 3.3.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2002 48 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the East Range Training Area IAW Para 3.4 - 3.4.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2003 622.20 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the East Range Drop Zone IAW Para 3.4 - 3.4.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2004 54 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Drum Road/Poamoho Bypass IAW Para 3.5.- 3.5.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2005 64 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Kahuku Training Area Roads IAW Para 3.6 - 3.6.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2006 396 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Kahuku Training Area (Drop Zone) IAW Para 3.6 -

3.6.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2007 20 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Dillingham Military Reservation (DMR) IAW Para

3.7 - 3.7.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2008 68 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Dillingham Military Reservation (Open Areas) IAW Para 3.7 - 3.7.1 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2009 6,024 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua IAW Para 3.8 - 3.8.8; Para 3.8.10 - 3.8.13 and Para 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement

(PWS).

Price per cut per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2010 1,392 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Grounds maintenance at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua (Archaeological Sites) IAW Para 3.8.1 - 3.8.2; Para 3.8.9 - 3.8.9.3 and Para 3.8.14 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2011 140 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Herbicide applications at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua North/South Firebreak Road IAW Para 3.8.12.2 and Para 3.8.13.1 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2012 450 Acre OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Herbicide applications at the Pililaau Military Range(PMR)/Makua Firebreak Road, 60 meter (197 ft) 75 acres IAW Para 3.8.12.2 and Para 3.8.13.1 - 3.8.15 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Price per application per acre.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2013 1 Each OPTION PSC S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Srvc

FFP

Contractor Manpower Reporting IAW Para 8 of the Performance Work Statement

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Par (h) is amended to read: Single Award. The Government intends to award a single contract resulting from this solicitation.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION:

1. Proposal Submission.

a. The solicitation will be posted at the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website at https://www.fbo.gov. Once posted, it is the responsibility of the contractor to monitor the website until the closing date for any issued amendments.

b. Proposals shall be submitted and accepted only at the following address by regular mail, commercial/Government carrier or direct drop off/hand carried. Electronic proposal submissions via email or facsimile (fax) will not be accepted.

413th Contracting Support Brigade Regional Contracting Office – Hawaii ATTN: Annabelle F. Miller or Irvin G. Bonus Bldg 108, 3rd Floor 742 Santos Dumont Avenue Wheeler Army Air Field, HI 96854

c. The Government is not responsible for lost or mishandled packages or late deliveries. Offerors are cautioned to allow sufficient time for timely receipt of proposals. Offerors that intend to hand deliver proposals must notify Annabelle F. Miller via email at annabelle.f.miller.civ@mail.mil or call at (808) 656-0986 at least two calendar days prior to the intended submission date to coordinate delivery and acceptance.

d. Proposals must be received by the contracting office on or before the solicitation closing date and time stated under Block 8 of the SF1449 Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items. Local time is Hawaii Standard Time (HST). It is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure proposals are received and acknowledged by the Contract Specialist on or before the closing date.

e. Minimum Proposal Acceptance Period. The proposal acceptance period is amended to 180 days. By submittal of a proposal, the contractor agrees to hold the prices in its proposal firm for 180 calendar days.

d. The Government may reject any or all responses if such actions are in the public interest and/or waive informalities and minor irregularities in the submitted proposals. The Government reserves the right to cancel this Request for Proposal (RFP) and make no award. By responding to this RFP and submitting a proposal in response to the RFP, the Contractor understands that the Government shall not be liable for any costs incurred by the Contractor in response to this RFP.

2. Solicitation Questions. Questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to the Contract Specialist at annabellle.f.miller.civ@mail.mil or Contracting Officer at irvin.g.bonus.civ@mail.mil within seven (7) days after the date specified in Block 6 of the SF1449. The Government reserves the right to not respond to questions concerning this solicitation received after the date and time specified for receipt of questions. A summary of questions received and Government responses will be provided by amendment and posted to the FBO website.

3. Site Visit.

a. A site visit will be conducted on 13 - 14 Sep 16 at 0900 am HST. Attendees will meet at the following location:

Regional Contracting Office - Hawaii Bldg. 108, 3rd Floor 742 Santos Dumont Ave Wheeler Army Airfield

b. Offerors are required to adhere to Military Regulations to gain access to the facility. Attendees are responsible for gaining access. Attendees will need to provide proof of insurance and registration of vehicles and have a valid photo ID and/or photo driver’s license. Attendees will be required to provide their own transportation.

c. Offerors interested in attending the site visit shall limit their participation to two (2) representatives per company. Attendee information to include company name, address, representative names, telephone numbers and email addresses shall be provided to the contract specialist via email at annabelle.f.miller.civ@mail.mil or contracting officer at irvin.g.bonus.civ.mil@mail.mil no later than 1000 AM HST on 9 Sep 16.

d. Any discussion, remarks and explanations that may be made by any Government representative during the site visit will not change the terms and conditions of the solicitation, unless the solicitation is amended in writing.

e. The Government reserves the right to disallow or limit the use of still or video camera.

4. Proposal Files

a. File Packaging. Offerors shall place their proposals in three-ring loose leaf binders that will permit substitution of pages should revisions be required. Proposal shall be submitted in four separate volumes labeled Volume I – General, Volume II – Technical, Volume III – Past Performance, and Volume IV - Price. Each binder shall contain an outer cover sheet that identifies the following information:

(1) RFP Number (W912CN-16-R-0006)

(2) Volume Number

(3) Copy Number

(4) Content’s Title

(5) Offeror’s Name

(6) Proposals shall be marked “SOURCE SELECTION – PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE”

(7) The label “TO BE DELIVERED UNOPENED TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER” shall be marked on the exterior of envelope or box containing all volumes.

b. A sanitized version (remove references to company name) will be provided for the Technical Proposal, Volume II.

c. Offerors shall submit an original proposal along with one electronic copy of all volumes provided on CD, including the sanitized version of the Technical Proposal, Volume II.

d. Format. Volumes II and III shall not exceed 30 pages and 15 pages, respectively, front and back (including attachments, appendices and addendums, but excluding the Table of Contents) and shall be limited to Arial or Times New Roman 12-point font size for all text, and a minimum of one inch margin on all four sides.

Offerors can include 11 x 17 foldouts within the 30-page limit only if these contain graphics or charts. A 10-point font can also be used for graphics only. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and returned, unread, to the offeror.

The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled with a Table of Contents for each volume.

Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

5. Proposal Content. Interested parties shall complete and submit the items identified below with their proposal.

a. Volume I – General. Volume I shall contain the accurate, fully completed, and signed original of all proposal documents requiring signatures of the offeror. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the offer and all certifications requiring original signature. Failure to follow the below Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. Volume I shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

(1) TAB A Exceptions/Assumptions (if applicable). Identify and explain any exceptions, deviations or assumptions used in the proposal preparation.

(2) TAB B Standard Form 1449 Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items with Blocks 12, 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c completed and signed by an authorized representative/official of the company/firm. Include acknowledgement of amendments, if any. The SF 1449 must contain an original signature in Block 30 of the form.

The offeror shall provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to their proposal and who can obligate their company contractually.

(3) TAB C Completed FAR Clause 52.212-3 Offeror Representation and Certifications – Commercial Items (if not entered into System for Award Management (SAM)).

(4) TAB D Responsibility Determination Narrative. For purposes of conducting responsibility determination, submit a narrative addressing the following. The responsibility determination will only be conducted on the apparent successful contractor.

i. Adequacy of financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them;

ii. Ability to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

iii. Adequacy of the company/firm’s performance record. Provide at least two (2) references (name, telephone no, email address, a brief description of project/contract completed).

iv. Description of how the company/firm maintains integrity and business ethics.

v. Adequacy of the company/firm’s organization, experience, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as quality assurance measures and safety programs applicable to materials to be delivered and services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors).

vi. Adequacy of the necessary vehicles and equipment, or ability to obtain them.

b. Volume II – Technical. The technical proposal shall be clear, concise and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims in the offeror’s proposal. It shall discuss in sufficient detail to demonstrate overall understanding of the requirement and feasibility of its approach to perform all required services and ensure a successful performance. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications, technical data, etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. All data relating to a particular topic should be included in that section, even if it is duplicative of another evaluation factor, as each evaluation factor will be rated individually. Volume II shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

(1) TAB A Exceptions/Assumptions (if applicable). Identify and explain any exceptions, deviations or assumptions used in the proposal preparation.

(2) TAB B Sub-factor 1 Staffing matrix, equipment list and narrative as described in Para (B)(1)(a) of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items.

(3) TAB C Sub-factor 2 Completed Work Experience Information per Attachment 1 as described in Para (B)(1)(b) of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items.

c. Volume III – Past Performance

(1) TAB A Exceptions/Assumptions (if applicable). Identify and explain any exceptions, deviations or assumptions used in the proposal preparation.

(2) TAB B The Offeror will submit a list of relevant contracts and/or subcontracts completed within the last three years (if any), and all related contracts and subcontracts currently in process (if any). The contracts listed may include those with the public or private sector. Data concerning the prime offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor (if applicable), in alphabetical order. For each listed contract and/or subcontract, the offeror will provide the following information:

Contract number Dollar value Period of performance Description of services provided Explain how the services previously or currently being performed are relevant to this requirement in terms of nature, scope, size, magnitude and complexity.

(3) TAB C Past Performance Information Questionnaire (Attachment 2). For all contracts identified in the list under TAB B above, Offeror shall complete and submit a cover letter and Past Performance Information Questionnaire for each past performance reference. Offeror shall complete only Part I of the questionnaire to include the offeror/company name and address and send the questionnaire directly to the past performance reference. Point of contact references shall be instructed to complete Part II of the questionnaire and electronically return a completed questionnaire via email directly to the Contract Specialist at annabelle.f.miller.civ@mail.mil or Contracting Officer at irvin.g.bonus.civ@mail.mil on or before the solicitation due date.. Offeror shall ensure that the reference POC’s e-mail address and contact information is current.

d. Volume IV - Price

(1) TAB A Exceptions/Assumptions (if applicable). Identify and explain any exceptions, deviations or assumptions used in the proposal preparation.

(2) TAB B RFP SF 1449 – Continuation Sheet Supplies and Services/Pricing and Pricing Spreadsheet.

Submit pricing for all contract line items (CLINs).

(3) TAB C Pricing Spreadsheet per Attachment 3

Attachment 1 Work Experience Attachment 2 Cover Letter and Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 3 Pricing Spreadsheet

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

04ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS

A. BASIS OF AWARD

1. This source selection is conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12 Acquisition of Commercial Items and FAR Part 15 Contracting By Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS). The Government anticipates awarding a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) requirements type contract resulting from the solicitation and reserves the right to not award a contract at all depending on the quality of offers received and availability of funds.

2. Award will be made to a single offeror who is deemed responsible IAW FAR 9.104, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation, meets the Government’s requirements and offers the best value to the Government from a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) standpoint. Appropriate consideration shall be given to three (3) evaluation factors: Technical Acceptability, Past Performance and Price.

3. The Government reserves the right to determine which offers show the required capability IAW the evaluation factors. The Government also reserves the right to eliminate from further consideration those offers which are considered unacceptable and not capable of being made acceptable without major rewrite or revision.

4. The Government intends to award without discussions. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. In the event discussions become necessary, the Contracting Officer may determine that the number of offers that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of offers to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated offers.

5. Trade-offs between cost/price and non-cost/price factors are not permitted. Unreasonably high, unbalanced, inaccurate or incomplete price offers may be the grounds for eliminating an offer from competition.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS

1. Factor I - Technical Acceptability. Proposals will be rated on an “Acceptable”, or “Unacceptable” basis.

In order to be considered for award, a proposal must have an “Acceptable” rating for each of the technical sub-factors and an overall “Acceptable” technical rating. Any “Unacceptable” rating on any of the sub-factors will result in an overall technical rating of “Unacceptable”.

The following sub-factors shall be used to determine technical acceptability. Non-submission of any of these elements shall render the offer technically unacceptable and shall not be considered for award. All of the sub-factors shall be clearly addressed in the proposal. The two technical sub-factors are as follows:

a. Sub-Factor 1 Technical Capability and Approach

The proposal will be evaluated to determine how well the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an overall understanding of the requirements as well as the extent to which the proposed approach reflects the capabilities necessary to successfully perform the contract requirements. The proposal will be evaluated to determine if the contractor proposed an adequate number of qualified personnel and equipment to perform the requirement and demonstrate the ability to successfully complete the tasks within the required frequency schedules.

To be determined acceptable, the contractor shall provide a staffing matrix that identifies adequate and qualified personnel to perform the requirement, to include hours assigned, labor categories (including management) and number of personnel in each labor category and total man-hours for each labor category and an equipment list that will be utilized during contract performance. Contractor shall provide a narrative explanation of how the proposed personnel and equipment will successfully complete the requirements in the PWS.

b. Sub-Factor 2 Relevant Work Experience

The proposal will be evaluated to determine if the offeror has relevant work experience performed within the last three (3) years for the same or similar work with regards to scope and magnitude performed. In order to be considered technically acceptable, the contractor shall have at least one year relevant work experience as described above. Contractor shall complete the Work Experience Information per Attachment 1 for each work experience submitted.

2. Factor II – Past Performance. The Past Performance evaluation will assess the relative risks associated with an offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by that offeror’s record of past performance. Performance risk is assessed at the factor level after evaluating aspects of the offeror’s recent past performance and focusing on performance that is relevant to the services being procured under this solicitation.

Proposals will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis. In order to be considered for award, the offeror’s past performance must be evaluated as acceptable. The Government will evaluate three (3) relevant past performance information (not older than three years) on same or similar contracts obtained from the government and commercial sources provided by the prospective contractor. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation.

a. Recency and Relevancy. The first aspect is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. To be relevant, the effort must be the same or similar in nature, scope, size, magnitude and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation and shall have been performed in the last three (3) years. Past performance information that is not recent and relevant will not be evaluated and will be considered “Unacceptable”.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

b. Contractor Performance. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts. Responses to the past performance questionnaire in the following areas will be considered in evaluating past performance information.

(1) Quality of Service: A pattern of successful completion of tasks of good quality conforming to the PWS requirements.

(2) Schedule/Timeliness of Performance: A pattern of submitting deliverables/completing tasks that are timely

(3) Business Relations: A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.)

(4) Management of Personnel: A pattern of effective hiring and retention practices

c. In addition to the Past Performance Questionnaire, the Government may review any other source of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s) and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

3. Factor III - Price. Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating. The Government expects competitive proposals to be submitted for this procurement and will use competition to determine price reasonableness.

However, the Government may utilize any or a combination of methods identified in FAR 15.404 to determine price reasonableness.

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All offers shall be subject to evaluation by a team of Government evaluators. Each factor and sub-factor shall be evaluated using the following assessment approaches:

1. Technical Evaluation Approach. Proposals will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis. All technical sub-factors will receive an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” rating.

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2. Past Performance Evaluation Approach. Offers will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis.

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Notes: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

An unacceptable rating of past performance will be referred to the Small Business Administration for a responsibility of competency determination prior to contract award.

3. Price Evaluation Approach.

a. Total evaluated price shall be the basis for evaluating price for contract award decision purposes.

Total evaluated price shall be determined by adding the offered prices on the CLINs stated in the solicitation (base and option years). In the event the unit price(s) and extended price(s) are ambiguous, the Government shall use the indicated unit price(s) for evaluation and award purposes. Offerors shall submit prices for all CLINs and for all performance periods. Failure to submit a price for any CLIN/sub-CLIN shall result in the offer being considered unacceptable.

b. Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. As part of the price evaluation, the Government will evaluate the Option to Extend Services under FAR Clause 52.217-8 by adding one-half of the offeror’s final option period price to the offeror’s total price. Thus, the offeror’s total price, for the purpose of evaluation will include the prices for the base period, first option, second option and one-half of the second option. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT REV

Performance Work Statement (PWS) Rev 1 Grounds Maintenance and Vegetation Control at Various Army Military Range on the Island of O'ahu, Hawaii.

Vision Statement:

To provide ground maintenance services to Hawaii's Military by providing grass cutting, vegetation control, and herbicide application to training areas, and ranges to present a clean, neat, and professional…