W912BV23C0003_Keystone Stilling Basin.pdf

W44XGQ23202229

Keystone Stilling Basin Repairs - Keystone Lake, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

This is a competitive solicitation for a firm-fixed price contract.

The NAICS code for this project is 237990 – Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. The size standard is $39.5M.

In accordance w ith FAR PART 36 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) PART 236, the cost magnitude of this project is betw een: $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

This acquisition is solicited as a Total Small Business Set-Aside

TYLER L GODWIN 918.669.7281

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

22-Nov-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________200 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________17 Oct 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

W912BV23C0003

7. ISSUED BY CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

W912BV

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

918-669-7436FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W912BV22R00200003 63

See Item 7

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE

4J129

FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

SEE SCHEDULE

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

$4,436,417.04 See Schedule

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE 96414527. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGRS FINANCE CENTER

5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

DISBURSING DIVISION: 901-873-9136

MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR

MOBLEY CONTRACTORS INC

MOBLEY

W K FRENCH

952 HIGHWAY 287

MORRILTON AR 72110-9417

15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (501)354-2510

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.)1 Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract. REF:

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print) ROBERT W CONNORS / Added by UPASS

TEL: 918.669.7078 EMAIL: robert.w.connors@usace.army.mil

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY 22-Nov-2022

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENTX

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 11 00 - SF 1442 and CLIN Schedule

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job $1,210,720.91 $1,210,720.91 Concrete repairs less than 2 inches

FFP

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: W44XGQ23202229

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: W44XGQ23202229

PSC CD: Z2KA

NET AMT $1,210,720.91

ACRN AA

CIN: W44XGQ232022290001

$1,210,720.91

0002 1 Job $1,534,129.91 $1,534,129.91 Concrete repairs greater than 2 inches

FFP

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: W44XGQ23202229

NET AMT $1,534,129.91

CIN: W44XGQ232022290002

$1,534,129.91

0003 1 Job $1,691,566.22 $1,691,566.22 Stilling Basin Concrete Baffle Repairs

FFP

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: W44XGQ23202229

NET AMT $1,691,566.22

CIN: W44XGQ232022290003

$1,691,566.22

ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

AA: 96X31230000 082458 32005L5105008990 NA 96345

AMOUNT: $4,436,417.04

ACRN CLIN/SLIN CIN AMOUNT

AA 0001 W44XGQ232022290001 $1,210,720.91

0002 W44XGQ232022290002 $1,534,129.91

0003 W44XGQ232022290003 $1,691,566.22

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions & Notices to Offerors

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

Repair concrete deficiencies within the Keystone Lake Stilling Basin in accordance with the plans and specifications.

The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible firm whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and is determined the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The offeror must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Tulsa District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located at 2488 E. 81st Street, Tulsa, OK 74137-4290, if it does not contain a return mailing address.

There will be no exceptions.

USACE Tulsa District C/O: Tyler Godwin Phone: 918-669-7281 Email: tyler.l.godwin@usace.army.mil

1.3. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and any amendments will be posted electronically on SAM.gov, Contract Opportunities via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/.

Solicitation Number: W912BV22R0020

It shall be the Offeror’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received in response to this solicitation.

Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

1.4. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to the Solicitation shall be submitted via Bidders Inquiry (reference instructions below). Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a publicized question and answer on ProjNet’s Bidder Inquiry and/or written amendment to the solicitation.

Contractual and Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at:

https://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register, go to the web page and click on the BID tab. Select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, and enter the Bidder Inquiry Key for this solicitation listed below, your e-mail address, and then click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify the information on the next screen is correct and click continue. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.

The solicitation number is: W912BV22R0020 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: BVJVMC-4ZKM22

The bidder inquiry system will close for new inquiries six (6) calendar days prior to proposal due date to ensure adequate time to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, and review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry. The bidder inquiry technical help call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is (800)428-HELP. Offers will NOT be publicly opened.

Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

The points of contacts for this solicitation are:

Contract Specialist: Tyler Godwin Telephone: (918)669-7281 E-mail: tyler.l.godwin@usace.army.mil

Contracting Officer: Robert Conners Telephone: 918-669-7078 E-mail: robert.w.connors@usace.army.mil

1.5. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

The NAICS Code selected for this project is 237990 and the size standard is $39,500,000.00. Also see FAR 52.204- 8, Annual Representations and Certifications.

1.6. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This request for proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal

1.7. SITE VISIT

The vendor is highly encouraged to attend a site visit.

See FAR 52.236-27 ALT I for site visit information.

1.8. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, including attachments. The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.9. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

1.9.1. The submittal method for proposals is electronic via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment website or email ONLY (no mailed proposals).

Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment website: https://piee.eb.mil.

The following email addresses must be entered for notification of proposal receipt and download availability:

Tyler.L.Godwin@usace.army.mil robert.w.connors@usace.army.mil

1.9.2. Proposals will be received until the date and time and specified in this request for proposal. Mail all bonds to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District ATTN: CESWT-CT-E (Tyler Godwin) 2488 E. 81st Street Tulsa, OK 74137-4290

1.9.3. The proposal documents shall be marked Solicitation Number: W912BV-22-R-0020

1.10. PROPOSALS

Offer Closing Date: July 7th, 2022.

Offer Closing Time: 2:00 pm Central Standard Time (CST)

1.11. DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation are neither encouraged nor desired. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for the award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these must be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

Notwithstanding the above, if deviations and exceptions are included with the offer, the offeror shall list and describe in detail the deviations and/or exceptions. All deviations and exceptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A Destination Government 0002 N/A N/A Destination Government 0003 N/A N/A Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 200 dys. ANP 1 PPMD, CIVIL WORKS BRANCH

RICHARD BILINSKI

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA

DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

918-669-7236 FOB: Destination

967273

0002 200 dys. ANP 1 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0003 200 dys. ANP 1 (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

252.236-7008 Contract Prices-Bidding Schedules DEC 1991

Section 00 22 11 - Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria, Basis of Award One-Step-Best Value, Design-Build (Single Award)

EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION 00 22 11

PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

PART I -- PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS.

(1) Each offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate PDF files. Ensure that each separate file is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the offeror.

(2) Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

(3) No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

(4) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

(5) Do not include exceptions or deviations to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "Unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to submission of the offer. If the offeror must make any assumptions prior to submitting the proposal, the offeror shall list and describe in detail the assumptions on the first page of each Tab. All assumptions shall be fully supported with the offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. The offeror shall clearly describe on the Proposal Cover Sheet submitted with the Price Proposal any assumption to the contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. Proposal exceptions/deviations will not be considered a part of the contract after award unless specifically approved by the Contracting Officer in writing at the time of contract award.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to making an award. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

c. COST OR PRICING DATA. Offerors are not required to submit Cost or Pricing Data with their offers.

However, if deemed necessary, supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluation. This will not be requested until after the initial proposal submission.

d. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

(1) Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc.

(2) Proposal materials shall be submitted in electronic format as shown below (see paragraph entitled

“Electronic Format”). Electronic proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents. Font size shall not be less than 10 point. Do not use condensed font. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches shall be used. Eleven-by-seventeen (11 x 17) inch sheets will be counted as two 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch sheets. Technical, Past Performance and Price Proposals shall be provided as separate files. The Price Proposal file shall be named “Price Proposal”. The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

(3) Electronic Format: Electronic copies of each volume shall be submitted through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/ using the applicable solicitation number. Proposals submitted by mail or hand-carried will not be evaluated. Proposals sent through proprietary or third-party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be retrieved. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to confirm receipt of proposals. All proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo: https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to obtain written confirmation of receipt of all electronic files of the full proposal by the DTRA Contracting office. In the event that the Solicitation Module is down, the alternate method for proposal submission is via email to: dtra.belvoir.al.mbx.fbo-notices@mail.mil ONLY. The Offeror must obtain prior approval from the Contracting Officer to use the alternate submission method. Offerors are responsible for ensuring electronic copies are virus-free and shall run an anti-virus scan before submission.

Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following software products: Adobe Acrobat Reader 11 and Microsoft Office Suite 2016. Narrative portions of the proposal shall be in Adobe Acrobat portable document file (pdf) searchable text format. Offerors shall not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files into the proposal files. Electronic files shall be clearly identified for each volume, section, and item. Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page.

(4) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(5) Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED”, shall show the date of revision, shall be submitted in appropriate via DoD SAFE with the entire proposal revised and complete.

e. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

(1) Price Proposal. Submit the Price Proposal in electronic format in accordance with paragraph 1.d.(3) above.

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted.

However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

#1

The Proposal Cover Sheet

#2

Signed Letter Responding to RFP and Acknowledgement of Amendments

#3

CLIN Schedule

#4

Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond)

(4) Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

(a) TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(2) (c) (i)-(v) and must be submitted by all offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror (and electronic address if available):

3. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

4. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

5. Tax Identification number of offeror.

(b) TAB 2: The Letter provided to respond to this Request for Proposal is to be completed by all offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

(c) TAB 3: Section 00 11 00, CLIN Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all offerors. See Section 00 11 00 with attached notes, for further instructions.

(d) TAB 4: Provide a fully executed Bid Bond as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee.

f. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal. Submit the Technical Proposal in accordance with paragraph 1.d.(3) above.

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the PDF bookmarks specified in the following chart. Bookmarks are to be visible immediately after opening.

CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

LOCATION FACTOR

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

TAB 1

N/A

ASSUMPTIONS

TAB 2

Factor #1

RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

TAB 3

Factor #2

KEY PERSONNEL

(3) Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

(a) Assumptions – no page limit.

(b) Factor #1, RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE – Limited to 10 pages (a maximum of 5 forms).

(c) Factor #2, KEY PERSONNEL – Limited to 2 pages for each resume provided.

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

(4) Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal. The following is a detailed description of the information to be submitted under each TAB.

(a) TAB 1: ASSUMPTIONS: The list of any assumptions made by the offeror shall be located under Tab 1 of Volume 2 – Technical Proposal. All assumptions shall be fully supported with the offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and specific requirement of the RFP. If assumptions are in conflict with the Request for Proposal (RFP), it may be considered a deviation and render the offeror’s proposal as unacceptable for award. The requirements of the RFP will be enforced after award in accordance with the proposal order of precedence clause.

(b) TAB 2: FACTOR 1, RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: Demonstrate the experience of the offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contractors, on projects same/similar to that described in the solicitation for same/similar services. If using subcontractors as part of the proposed team to demonstrate experience, describe the role they will play in this project and the percentage of work they will perform.

The offeror, or the proposed team, shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section (Attachment 1), in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete and completed within the last 5 years. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued at over $2,000,000.

The offer and the proposed team must collectively demonstrate experience in all of the following specialized experience areas, with each of the following specialized experience areas demonstrated on at least one project. A single project can be used to demonstrate multiple specialized experience areas. The required specialized experience areas are:

- Experience in diver investigation, inspection, and construction activities

- Experience in underwater drilling and installation of steel reinforcement dowels

- Experience in underwater marine concrete placement by the tremie method

(c) TAB 3: FACTOR 2, KEY PERSONNEL: By naming these personnel, the offeror is making a commitment that barring unforeseen circumstances, they are the individuals that will be working on this project.

Any substitutions shall be approved by the Contracting Officer. All key personnel and subcontractor personnel working on this project must be U.S. citizens or documented U.S. workers and must be able to provide proof of U.S.

citizenship or other authorized documentation.

Key Personnel: The offeror must provide resume data for the following key construction personnel:

- Construction Project Manager

- Project Superintendent

- Construction Quality Control (CQC) System Manager

- Site Safety Health Officer (SSHO)

Minimum qualifications for key personnel can be found within the project specifications and include, but may not be limited to the following references:

- Project Superintendent requirements as defined in 01 30 00, 1.3 PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT.

- CQC System Manager requirements as defined in 01 45 00, 3.4 QUALITY CONTROL ORGANIZATION

- SSHO requirements as defined in 01 35 00, 1.6 SITE QUALIFICATINOS, DUTIES, AND MEETINGS

Additionally, the offeror must provide the Letter of Commitment for Key Personnel as shown in Attachment 4.

Resume information to be provided shall be limited to no more than two (2) pages per person and shall include the following information as a minimum (see Attachment 3):

(i) Name and title

(ii) Project assignment

(iii) Name of firm with which associated

(iv) Years experience with this firm and with other firms

(v) Education degree(s), year, specialization, if applicable

(vi) Active professional registration, year first registered, if applicable

(vii) Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract

PAST PERFORMANCE: For the projects listed under Factor 1 – Relevant Specialized Experience, the Government will review the experience forms submitted as well as query the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (to include ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS) to validate past performance ratings on Department of Defense contracts and any other past performance information the Government deems necessary to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Firms without a history of past performance will be neutral rating.

For each project that does not have an ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation, offerors shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included at Attachment 2 to the points of contact responsible for monitoring performance under such contracts. The Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor

1. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 2) which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist identified in Part A, Paragraph 1 of Section 00 21 00, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to offerors via email prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

The information contained in the questionnaires will be used to evaluate the offeror’s past performance. Each contractor shall provide at least three (3) past performance ratings. Any rating an offeror has in ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS for the projects listed under Factor 1 will count toward this requirement. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the KO has received a minimum of three (3) questionnaires prior to that date/time or has provided written notification to the KO that they have current ratings in ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS. Entities that have no past customers shall notify the KO in writing, prior to the date and time established for the RFP closing, that they have had no previous clients and that the minimum number of questionnaires cannot be provided. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. The evaluation form shall be provided to the Contract Specialist directly from the reference. Do not request past performance questionnaires on projects that have final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluations. If a past performance questionnaire is received on a project where a final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation exists, the ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation will serve as the official rating of record for evaluation purposes.

The Government may contact references provided as part of Factor 1 – Relevant Specialized Experience, for information regarding the offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions. The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS), and any other sources not provided by the offeror.

PART II – EVALUATION OF OFFEROR PROPOSALS

2. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOWEST-PRICE, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCESS.

An evaluation for acceptability will be performed on the low price proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3).

The proposal that provides the lowest price for the base proposal combined with all options and is otherwise technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be “Unacceptable”. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the factors will result in a technically “Unacceptable” rating and preclude award.

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors of the base proposal. Tradeoffs are not permitted.

Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

2.2 EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

a. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g) and may be rejected if it is determined that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

b. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a

CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

2.3 EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. Each Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria:

a. FACTOR 1: RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: The Government will review the experience of the contractor on projects and key personnel provided in response to Factor 1. Offerors must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

(1) The prime must have at least three (3) projects that are the same/similar to that of the work found in this solicitation; AND

(2) At least one (1) of the project references submitted for the prime contractor must be valued at over

$1,000,000. All projects submitted must have been at least 50% complete within the last 5 years; AND

(3) Each of the following required specialized experience areas must be demonstrated in at least one example project: diver investigation, inspection, and construction activities; underwater drilling and installation of steel reinforcement dowels; and underwater marine concrete placement by the tremie method.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “Unacceptable” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

b. FACTOR 2: KEY PERSONNEL: The Government will review the resumes provided in response to Factor

2. Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive and “Acceptable” on this factor. The offeror must demonstrate in all resumes that he key personnel proposed have:

(1) A minimum experience as required by the specified sections cited in the submission requirements. If none is specified, all personnel shall have a minimum of 5 years specialized experience in their field; AND

(2) Experience on projects same/similar to the work in this solicitation working in the position they are assigned to under this contract.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptable standards under this factor will result in an “Unacceptable” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

PAST PERFORMANCE: The Government will review the experience forms submitted as well as all CPARS, ACASS, CCASS evaluations regardless of project and past performance questionnaires for projects submitted under Factor 1. The Government may contact points of contacts listed on the “Experience Information” forms submitted under Factor 1. Offerors must demonstrate the following minimum acceptability standards:

Any identified element or overall rating that is LESS than SATISFACTORY for past performance for any project submitted under Factor 1, shall result in an 'UNACCEPTABLE' rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

The Government places a higher value on performance, which documents successful outcomes and is supported by outside source confirmation, for example, but not limited to CCASS/ACASS or other agency performance databases or personal knowledge. The Government’s evaluation is not limited to past performance information on the cited example projects.

Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, if relevant. An entity many not establish past performance based on the past performance of proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity. If the Government does not obtain past performance information and cannot establish a past performance record for the firm through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance risk will be considered “unknown”.

3. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

a. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as “Unacceptable”.

b. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered “Unacceptable”. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided.

c. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of an “Unacceptable” determination of acceptability for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal. Note: It is the Government’s intent to award without discussions.

d. If awarded the contract, the Contractor shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications issued with this RFP.

e. In Accordance with clause 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements, offerors are required to have a NIST score. Any offer received without a NIST score will be rendered “Unacceptable”.

SECTION 00 22 11 - ATTACHMENT 1

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Prime Contractor)

1. Contract/Task Order Number:

Include Brief Explanation for Block 4 discussing reasons for time growth as necessary:

2. Contractor Name:

Address:

3. Contract Award Value:

4. Contract/TO /PO Status: Active Complete

Original Contract Completion Date:

Actual Completion Date :

Time Growth(as % of total):

Liquidated Damages Assessed(Y/N) :

(if yes, state $ amount)

5. Project Title:

Location:

6. Project Description-- to include the role of the contractor on the project and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort:

7. Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client – provide:

Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

SECTION 00 22 11 - ATTACHMENT 2

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE GOVERNMENT’S CONTRACT SPECIALIST. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts

E VG S M U

N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U

N

d) Overall customer satisfaction

E VG S M U

N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

SECTION 00 22 11 - ATTACHMENT 3

KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

Provide information, listed below, on separate sheets showing qualifications of: On Site Construction Project Manager, Quality Control Manager (CQC System Manager), Site Superintendent, and Site Safety and Health Officer. NOTE:

Match the positions on this page to the list of key personnel in the narrative submission requirements and evaluation criteria.

(o) Name and Title ________________________________________________________________

(p) Project Assignment _____________________________________________________________

(q) Name of Your Firm _____________________________________________________________

(r) Years experience in the role identified ______________________________________________

(s) No. of Years: With this Firm__________ With other Firms____________

(t) Education: Degree(s)/Year/Specialization ____________________________________________

(u) Active Registration, if any: No._______, State(s) ______, First Year/ Current Year ______/______

(v) Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract:

SECTION 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT 4

LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that I will fulfill the duty of (Job Title).

Sincerely, (prospective employee signs)

Date: ____________

W912BV23C0003

SECTION 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT 5

LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY SUBCONTRACTORS

(USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that (insert name of key Subcontractors firm) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project).

Sincerely, (Authorized Official)

Date: ____________

Section 00 45 00 - Representations & Certifications

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General AUG 2019 252.204-7020 NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements NOV 2020 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.219-9 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (NOV 2021)

(a) This clause does not apply to small business concerns.

(b) Definitions. As used in this clause—

"Alaska…