W912BV22R0013 3-Bay Hangar Phase 1 RTA Package.pdf

US Army Corps of

Engineers Tulsa Dist.

SOLICITATION NO.: W912BV22R0013

KC 46A 3-BAY DEPOT

MAINTENANCE HANGAR

TINKER AFB, OK

DESIGN-BUILD RFP

PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE SOLICITATION

09 MARCH 2022

KC-46A 3-BAY DEPOT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (WWYK213001)

Tinker AFB, OK

* APPENDICES

* - To be included in the Phase 2 Solicitation ** - To be included in Phase 1 and Phase 2

End of Project Table of Contents

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE SOLICITATION

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

* 00 11 00 00 21 00

PRICING (CLIN) SCHEDULE

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

00 22 00 PHASE 1 SELECTION PROCEDURES

00 22 20 PHASE 2 SELECTION PROCEDURES

00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00 72 00 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00 73 00 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

00 73 46 WAGE DETERMINATIONS

*DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 04 00 COORDINATION, FIELD ENGINEERING, AND MEETINGS (CORO)

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK

01 14 00 WORK RESTRICTIONS

01 30 00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

01 30 01 ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE FULL DB

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 16.00 10 DESIGN AFTER AWARD (TINKER NFT)

01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

01 35 26.00 10 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS (COAO)

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

* 01 45 00.00 21 QUALITY CONTROL (DB)

01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS 3.0 CM)

01 45 35 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS (TINKER)

01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 57 20.00 02 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (TAFB)

01 58 00 BULLETIN BOARD, PROJECT SIGN, AND SAFETY SIGN

01 60 00.00 50 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 78 00.00 15 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

01 78 23.10 10 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA - COAO

01 91 00.15 TOTAL BUILDING COMMISSIONING

Title: KC-46A 3-Bay Depot Maintenance Hangar, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma

This is a tw o-phase, design/build, solicitation for a f irm fixed-price contract w hich w ill be aw arded using the Best Value Trade-of f Process in accordance w ith FAR 15.101-1. The contracting off icer intends to aw ard a f irm f ixed-price contract to the responsible Phase 2 Offeror w hose proposal the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the non-price factors described in the solicitation, and price.

The NAICS code for this project is 236220.

The site visit w ill be held in Phase 2 and in accordance w ith FAR 52.236-27.

In accordance w ith DFARS 236.204, the cost magnitude of this contract is $100M to $250M.

Please Note: this solicitation requires of ferors to enter a National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) score in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS). The NIST score is required before an aw ard can be made.

DARIO M RISSONE 918.669.7109

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

09-Mar-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________913 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, X negotiable. (See _________________________52.211.10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________08 Apr 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

W912BV

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

918-669-7436FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W912BV22R0013 85

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions & Notices to Offerors

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This is a two-phase competitive solicitation for a firm fixed-price contract, which will be awarded using the Best Value Trade-Off Process for the KC-46A 3-Bay Depot Maintenance Hangar at Tinker AFB, OK. The general scope of the project is to design and construct a high-bay depot maintenance hangar for the KC-46A Pegasus Aerial Refueling Aircraft. The facility consists of three hangar docks sized to enclose the KC-46A aircraft and required clearances. The hangar bays will accommodate the aircraft in both nose-in and tail-in configuration. Overhead cranes and fall protection will be integrated into this facility. Included within the facility are plant equipment maintenance support and associated back shops, administrative and facility support spaces including program management office spaces. It also includes clearing and grading of the site, storm drainage, aircraft parking apron, aircraft hangar dock access ramps and movement area, utility infrastructure systems, electrical, water, sewer, industrial waste, aircraft fueling system, communications, roads, vehicle parking, curb and gutter, walks and all other supporting facilities.

1.2. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall submit all volumes of its proposal electronically via Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module (https://piee.eb.mil).

USACE Tulsa District Point of Contact is Mr. Dario Rissone:

Phone: 918-669-7109 Email: dario.m.rissone@usace.army.mil

1.3. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and any amendments will be posted electronically on SAM.gov, Contract Opportunities via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/.

Solicitation Number: W912BV22R0013

It shall be the Offeror’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

1.4. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

All contractual matters, questions and or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=HomePagePublic no later than 10 calendar days prior to the proposal due date, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.

The bidder inquiry key for this project is Y4W33X-B53PT2.

Instructions for registering in the ProjNet Bidder Inquiry system are available on the above website.

1.5. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

The NAICS Code selected for this project is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, and the size standard is $39,500,000.00. Also see FAR 52.204-8.

1.6. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This request for proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

1.7. SITE VISIT

The government intends to hold a pre-proposal conference for Phase 2 of the solicitation. The date, location, and time will be announced by amendment to the solicitation. All interested offeror’s are highly encouraged to attend in person or call into the number provided below:

The site visit information will be provided by amendment in Phase 2.

All interested Offerors are urged to attend. During this conference, the requirements set forth in the Phase 2 solicitation will be reviewed and discussed, with part of the conference to include a question and answer period.

1.8. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments).

The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.9. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

1.9.1. The submittal method for proposals is electronically through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/ using the applicable solicitation number.

Proposals submitted by email, mail or hand-carried will not be evaluated. Proposals sent through proprietary or third-party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be retrieved. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to confirm receipt of proposals.

1.9.2. Proposals will be received until the date and time and specified in this Request for Proposal.

1.9.3. The packaging shall be marked Solicitation Number: W912BV22R0013.

1.10. PROPOSALS

Offer Closing Date: 8 April 2022 Offer Closing Time: 2:00 pm Central Standard Time (CST)

See Section 00 22 00 for Phase 1 proposal requirements and Section 00 22 20 for Phase 2 proposal requirements.

1.11. JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a) or HubZone joint venture, the offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively. Regardless of any agreement, all members of the JV shall sign the contract and the performance and payment bonds.

1.12. DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal are neither encouraged nor desired. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and, thus, ineligible for award.

Should the Offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these must be resolved prior to submission of the offer. Notwithstanding the above, if deviations and exceptions are included with the offer, the Offeror shall list and describe in detail the deviations and/or exceptions under Tab A. All deviations and exceptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. Deviations from the minimum standard of quality required by the RFP shall not be accepted unless identified by the offeror’s proposal and specifically approved by the Contracting Officer in writing. If unapproved, the Contractor must provide the RFP requirements without additional cost to the Government. If approved, the accepted deviation will take precedence as a provision of the solicitation. The Offeror shall also clearly describe on the Tab C submitted with the Price Proposal any exception to the contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. This information will not be evaluated separately but may impact the evaluation of other factors. Deviations and exceptions are not considered to be part of the contract unless the Contracting Officer accepts these in writing. If an Offeror has no deviations and exceptions, the Offeror shall include a sheet with the proposal stating that there are no deviations or exceptions

1.13. CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION

The Construction Cost Limitation (CCL) for this contract is $118,600,000.00, which includes all design, non-design, and construction costs. The Government may elect to not award to Offerors who propose pricing greater than the CCL, and reserves the right to reject proposals with pricing greater than the CCL.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition DEC 2021 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.215-7010 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

JUL 2019

252.215-7012 Requirements for Submission of Proposals via Electronic Media.

JAN 2018

252.236-7008 Contract Prices-Bidding Schedules DEC 1991

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DX rated order; X DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation. [Contracting Officer check appropriate box.]

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a firm fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from the Contracting Officer at 2488 E. 81st Street, Tulsa, OK 74137.

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (NOV 2020)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Regulation Supplement (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

252.236-7006 COST LIMITATION (JAN 1997)

(a)Certain items in this solicitation are subject to statutory cost limitations. The limitations are stated in the Schedule.

(b)An offer which does not state separate prices for the items identified in the Schedule as subject to a cost limitation may be considered nonresponsive.

(c)Prices stated in offers for items subject to cost limitations shall include an appropriate apportionment of all costs, direct and indirect, overhead, and profit.

(d) Offers may be rejected which--

(1)Are materially unbalanced for the purpose of bringing items within cost limitations; or

(2)Exceed the cost limitations, unless the limitations have been waived by the Government prior to award.

Section 00 22 00 - Phase 1 of 2 Phase Design Build Selection Process

DESIGN-BUILD -- PHASE 1 OF 2

SECTION 00 22 00

PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE

DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.0 OVERVIEW OF PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.1 This is a two-phase competitive solicitation for a firm, fixed-price contract, which will be awarded using the Best Value Trade-Off Process.

1.2 The general scope of the project is to design and construct a high-bay depot maintenance hangar for the KC-46A Pegasus Aerial Refueling Aircraft. The facility consists of three hangar docks sized to enclose the KC-46A aircraft and required clearances. The hangar bays will accommodate the aircraft in both nose-in and tail-in configuration. Overhead cranes and fall protection will be integrated into this facility. Included within the facility are plant equipment maintenance support and associated back shops, administrative and facility support spaces including program management office spaces. It also includes clearing and grading of the site, storm drainage, aircraft parking apron, aircraft hangar dock access ramps and movement area, utility infrastructure systems, electrical, water, sewer, industrial waste, aircraft fueling system, communications, roads, vehicle parking, curb and gutter, walks and all other supporting facilities.

1.3 Phase 1. The first phase is the “Request for Qualifications” or the acronym: “RFQ”, referred to in this solicitation as “Phase 1”. In Phase 1 of the 2 Phase design-build selection procedure, interested offerors may submit specified performance capability proposals, demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the design-build construction contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and will select up to five (5) of the highest rated Phase 1 Offerors to compete for the design-build contract in Phase 2.

1.4 Phase 2. In Phase 2, the selected Offerors will submit preliminary technical-design proposals and the remainder of the performance capability proposals, including identification of key subcontractors, the proposed contract duration, a preliminary schedule, plus a price proposal in response to the Phase 2 Request for Proposal. The final evaluation rating used for comparison, selection, and award will reflect both the ratings received in Phase 1 and the evaluation rating received in Phase 2.

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit: Any legally organized business entity, either organized as design-build entity, or design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, or other contractor team arrangements in accordance with FAR 9.601. Associations may be as joint ventures, partnerships, or as key team subcontractors.

2.2 What to Submit: Pro Forma Requirements to be provided for Phase 1: This information should be submitted as a separate .pdf file named “Pro Forma Requirements.pdf”, and shall consist of the following:

a. Cover letter containing:

i. Solicitation Number

ii. Name, address, email, telephone, and fax numbers of the Offeror

iii. Names, title, telephone, and fax numbers of the person(s) authorized to negotiate on the

Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation

iv. Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal

v. A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation

vi. Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Codes for the Offeror, and all teaming partners who participated in Factor 1 – Past Performance.

b. Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation with the instructions on the Standard Form 30 (amendment form).

c. The completed Section 00 45 00 of the solicitation (Representations and Certifications), Printed Entity Record from System for Award Management (SAM)

d. Letter from Surety stating Offeror is capable of providing a Bid Guarantee in Phase 2 as required in

FAR 52.228-1.

e. Financial statement and bank letter that verifies sufficient funds will be available to finance the work.

f. For Joint Ventures, the information required by paragraph “Joint Ventures”

g. Identify if the proposal is being submitted as a HUBZone entity.

2.3 When and Where to Submit. Proposals shall be received by the Tulsa District no later than the time and date specified in Block 10 of Standard Form 1442 via the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/ using the applicable solicitation number (see also paragraph 2.7.1).

2.4 In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failures to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror's evaluation. Offerors should provide sufficient detail and clearly define all items required in this section.

2.5 The Contracting Officer may remove any Offeror from further consideration during any phase of the procurement if the Offeror fails to meet the submittal requirements of the RFP or to reduce the competitive range for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2).

2.6 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as shown in paragraph 3.0, “Phase I Proposal and Related Evaluation Factors”.

2.7 Proposal Submission Formatting Requirements.

2.7.1 Electronic copies of each volume shall be submitted through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/ using the applicable solicitation number.

Proposals submitted by mail or hand-carried will not be evaluated. Proposals sent through proprietary or third-party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be retrieved. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to confirm receipt of proposals. All proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to obtain written confirmation of receipt of all electronic files of the full proposal by the DTRA Contracting office. In the event that the Solicitation Module is down, the alternate method for proposal submission is via email to: dtra.belvoir.al.mbx.fbo- notices@mail.mil ONLY. The Offeror must obtain prior approval from the Contracting Officer to use the alternate submission method. Offerors are responsible for ensuring electronic copies are virus-free and shall run an anti-virus scan before submission.

Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following software products: Adobe Acrobat Reader 11 and Microsoft Office Suite 2016. Narrative portions of the proposal shall be in Adobe Acrobat portable document file (pdf) searchable text format. Offerors shall not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files into the proposal files.

Electronic files shall be clearly identified for each volume, section, and item. Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents, including working bookmarks. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page.

2.7.2 Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use alternative paper sizes (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission.

2.7.3 Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide but may include headers and footers.

2.7.4 A page is defined as text or information on one side of the paper. The Government will not evaluate any information beyond the total page limits specified in this RFP. The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

2.7.5 The proposals shall contain a detailed Table of Contents.

2.7.6 Proposals shall contain the entire proposal in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file; do NOT scan the document(s) into a .pdf file except for the Past Performance Questionnaires PPQ-0. The text portion of the complete proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file, and the “find” function must be usable. The technical proposal will be appropriately organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The Pro Forma requirements shall be submitted as a separate file as required by paragraph 2.2.1 above.

2.7.7 A cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, point of contact), project description, and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a Table of Contents. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration.

2.7.8 Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) as detailed in this section. The SF 1442 may be scanned and shall be *Optical Character Recognition (OCR) compatible. All text must be legible and easily read. Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror.

2.7.9 Each Volume of the proposal shall be identified by the Solicitation Number (W912BV22R0013), project title (KC-46A 3-BAY DEPOT MAINTENANCE HANGAR, Tinker AFB, OK), name, address, and telephone number of the Offeror, and the following on the volume in bold letters:

Phase 1 – Volume 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

2.7.10 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as whole page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print, red text, and/or underlining. The reason for the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED”, shall show the date of revision. A revised copy of the entire proposal in .pdf format shall be provided. Requirements of this paragraph are also applicable to proposal revisions as a result of Discussions.

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

TAB A N/A SF 1442 and Proposal Data Sheet N/A

TAB B Factor 1 Past Performance Most Important Factor

TAB C Factor 2 Organization and Technical Approach 2nd Most Important Factor

4.0 TAB A – STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.1 Submit the SF1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the completed proposal data sheet (See Attachment 6, provided at the end of this section).

4.2 If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal.

All members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration.

4.3 If the Offeror has teaming agreements and / or letters of commitment, include a copy.

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 PAST PERFORMANCE

There are three aspects to the performance confidence evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality of past performance. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance shall be considered. Relevance and quality of performance will be combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each Offeror.

5.1 PAST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW

5.1.1 Recency of Past Performance. The first aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine if the past performance is recent. Recent is defined as completed, or currently in progress with at least 50% construction completed, within the past six (6) years as of the date of this solicitation.

5.1.2 Relevancy of Past Performance. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how relevant the past performance is to this solicitation. Relevant past performance is past performance that has a significant and demonstratable relationship to this solicitation. Examples of attributes that may demonstrate relevance to this solicitation include but are not limited to:

a. Projects demonstrating experience with design-build delivery

b. Projects with a contract value equal to or exceeding $50M

c. Projects constructed on military installations or other restricted access sites

d. Projects for design and construction of large high bay aircraft maintenance hangars

e. Design-build projects executed with the same design and construction team

f. Projects that demonstrate experience with High Performance and Sustainable Building (HPSB)

Guiding Principles certification per UFC 1-200-02, LEED Certification, or other third- party sustainability certifications.

g. Demonstrated experience with design and construction of airfield pavements

h. Demonstrated experience with local conditions

i. Demonstrated experience with applicable codes and regulations

Projects that demonstrate a combination of multiple relevant attributes will receive a higher relevancy rating than projects that demonstrate only one relevant attribute. The information presented in the offeror’s proposal, together with that from other sources available to the Government, will comprise the input for evaluation of this factor.

5.1.3 Quality of Past Performance. The third aspect of past performance is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. The Government determines the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information, and incorporates these into the performance confidence assessment. Evaluation will include, but is not limited to, quality, management, schedule, safety, as well as the extent to which the offeror attained applicable goals for small business participation.

5.1.4 Performance Confidence Assessment. The past performance confidence assessment rating is based the offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance. It will be based on the past performance of the firms or that of its predecessor, as defined in FAR 52.204-20, if applicable. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its key personnel apart from that of the entity.

5.1.4.1 In the case of firms for which there is no information on past contract performance, or where past contract performance information is not available, or has been determined not to be recent or relevant, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv).) In this case, the Government may not rate an offeror that lacks recent relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance. The Government may determine that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent with the stated solicitation criteria.

5.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS.

5.2.1 The offeror shall provide a brief introduction of the proposed team, identifying the roles and general responsibilities of each firm. The narrative shall be no longer than 1 page and will be utilized to improve the Government’s understanding of the proposed team and associated responsibilities. This narrative will not be separately evaluated.

5.2.2 The offeror shall submit up to twelve (12) recent projects demonstrating the offeror’s relevant experience utilizing the Project Information Worksheet – (Attachment 1). The offeror may submit up to six (6) projects for the prime contractor and up to six (6) projects for the design team member. Failure to provide the required information in the Project Information Worksheet may negatively impact the Government’s ability to assess the relevancy of the project to this solicitation, as well as the overall confidence assessment. A “project” is defined as a task order or stand-alone contract. Indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts do not qualify as a project.

5.2.3 For each of the projects submitted, to ensure the agency has all relevant past performance information, the Offeror shall submit copies of Federal / DoD / Navy / Army performance reviews that are likely already in the agency’s databases or likely within the agency’s arm’s reach (i.e., Contractor’s copy of CPARS evaluations). The contractor shall submit complete past performance records to include all interim evaluations as well as the Final evaluations.

5.2.4 For each project that does not have a CPARS evaluation, Offerors shall provide a Past Performance Questionnaire form PPQ-0 (Attachment 2) to a representative of the owner that can provide the owner’s opinion of the Offeror’s past performance for the project. The Past Performance Questionnaire form PPQ-0 is included in the solicitation and is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. There is no page limit associated with this factor.

5.2.5 Form PPQ-0 shall be utilized, and Offerors shall submit the completed PPQ with their proposal submission to the Contracting Office designated in the request for proposal submission location. The Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer will not require the PPQ to be sent directly from the client. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients / references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact shown in Section 00 21 00, INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS.

5.2.6 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

5.2.7 The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the completed questionnaires are submitted by the closing date.

The Government may contact and interview the owner’s representative on Past Performance questionnaires and reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the owner’s representative if the owner’s representative is not available.

5.2.8 The Government will evaluate the responses from the customers from which Past Performance Questionnaires have been received. The Government may contact and interview points of contact on the Past Performance Questionnaires. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed references if the listed reference is not available. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for the purpose of evaluating past performance.

5.2.9 Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

5.2.10 To improve the accuracy of database searches, the Offeror must also provide the CAGE Codes for the prime contractor, and all teaming partners (i.e., design firms, key subcontractors, Joint Venture Partners).

5.2.11 The Government may contact references for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete information for references provided in the project descriptions. Owners / references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design and / or construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subcontractors or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, and warranty work. The Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments.

5.2.12 The Government places a higher value on projects which demonstrate successful outcomes and are supported by outside source confirmation.

5.2.13 The Government also places a higher value on projects, which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully.

5.2.14 Joint Ventures. If Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, the proposal shall clearly identify the contractual responsibilities of each firm and the work to be performed by each;

describe the nature of the association; indicate whether the firms have experience working together in construction ventures, including how long and how many projects. If the joint venture has previously formed for purposes of executing similar type projects, the joint venture shall submit Project Information Worksheets for those combined efforts. If the joint venture is being formed specifically for this project and there is no prior experience as the joint venture, each member of the joint venture shall provide Project Information Worksheet(s) demonstrating the relevancy of their individual experience. The maximum number of Project Information Worksheets outlined in paragraph 5.2.2 is also appliable to joint ventures. If two entities form a joint venture, they will be limited to six (6) project information worksheets total, not per entity. Provide a copy of the commitment letter of the firms or the Joint Venture Agreement. Prior to award of any contract, a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement will be required. If approval of the Joint Venture Agreement is required by the Small Business Administration (SBA), failure to timely provide an approved Small Business Administration Joint Venture Agreement may prevent award of a contract.

a. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as the offering Joint Venture. The Joint Venture shall comply with the submission requirements outlined in paragraph 5.2.2.

b. If the Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the Joint Venture, the Offeror must provide those recent, relevant projects that it has performed as the Joint Venture, and then supplement the record with additional recent, relevant projects performed by each Joint Venture member in their individual capacities. Limitations on total number of projects submitted shall be in compliance with paragraph 5.2.2

c. The Joint Venture shall provide a brief narrative stating the roles that each partner of the Joint Venture will perform on this project and how the presented projects demonstrate the Joint Venture member’s experience and past performance commensurate with their role on this project, or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project. This narrative will be utilized to improve the Government’s understanding of the proposed team and will not be separately evaluated.

5.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.3.1 The Government will perform a performance confidence assessment of the Offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the contract requirements. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s responsiveness to the solicitation regarding past performance using the sources identified above. New companies and Joint Ventures shall be evaluated on their own past performance, or that of its predecessor as defined in FAR clause 52.204-20 Predecessor of Offeror, if relevant, to determine the company’s ability to perform satisfactorily under the elements of evaluation.

5.3.2 The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the Offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The past performance relevancy ratings are described below:

5.3.2.1 Very Relevant. Present / past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

5.3.2.2 Relevant. Present / past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

5.3.2.3 Somewhat Relevant. Present / past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

5.3.2.4 Not Relevant. Present / past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

5.3.3 The Government will next consider how well the Offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance.

5.3.3.1 Substantial Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

5.3.3.2 Satisfactory Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort

5.3.3.3 Limited Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

5.3.3.4 No Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

5.3.3.5 Unknown Confidence (Neutral). No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

5.3.4 Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor as defined in FAR Clause 52.204-20, Predecessor of Offeror, if relevant. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the Offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment will be considered “Unknown Confidence”.

Offerors may be provided an opportunity to address any negative past performance information about which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. The Government will evaluate past performance based on the elements listed below:

QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. Based on all information available, the Government will assess the quality of the actual construction undertaken and the standards of workmanship exhibited by the Offeror.

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror completing past projects within the scheduled completion times.

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s past customer satisfaction, cooperation with customers, and interaction on past projects.

SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s management of subcontractors, including mitigation of conflicts and resolution of disputes at the lowest level. For large businesses, the Government will also evaluate compliance with subcontracting plans.

DOCUMENTATION. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s level of meeting customer satisfaction on timeliness and quality of the documentation, reports, and other written materials completed by the Offeror on past projects.

SAFETY RECORD. All information available with respect to the Offeror’s safety record, to include CCASS/CPARS rating for safety, lost time incident rate, safety incentive program, safety awards, and other indications of improvements in safety will be taken into consideration in evaluating the Offeror’s overall safety record.

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 2 - ORGANIZATION AND TECHNICAL APPROACH. Provide information that describes the Offeror’s organization and intended technical approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Limit the information to 15 pages or less clearly but concisely describe the organizational and technical approach to project management and execution.