W912BV22R0004_RFP SBUR_MATOC.pdf

Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build, Unrestricted w ith SB Business Reserve, Vertical Construction MATOC

Please NOTE this solicitation requires offerors to enter a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) score in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) prior to any contract aw ard.

NAICS CODE: 236220 -- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, Small Business Size Standard: $39.5M

See continuation page.

RUDOLFO MORALES 918-669-7275

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

20-May-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________0 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________20 Jun 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

W912BV

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

918-669-7436FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W912BV22R0004 147

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

BLOCK 10 CONTINUATION

BLOCK 10 Continuation:

The market research analysis supports the establishment of an unrestricted solicitation with a Small Business Reserve IAW FAR 19.503, Reserves (a) & (b)(1). This strategy will provide a target of five (5) small businesses for the reserve, which could include one (1) Historically Underutilized Business Zone firm, one (1) Service-Disabled, Veteran-Owned Small Business firm, and one (1) Women-Owned Small Business firm, and a target of five (5) unrestricted firms with a total value of $495 million in shared contract capacity. The target of five Small Business awards for the reserve will be made to those Small Business firms evaluated as the best value contractors regardless of socioeconomic category. A socioeconomic category preference shall not apply during the source selection process. The acquisition incorporates the contract reserve process IAW FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i), Orders under Reserves. At the task order level, if the requirement under FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i) is not met, fair opportunity will be provided to all offerors within MATOC. The resulting Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDC), Multiple-Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) will utilize the best value trade-off process.

The MATOCs will have a five year base period. The estimated shared capacity of the contract is $495 million. The Government is under no obligation to issue any Task Orders against these MATOCs in excess of the minimum contract guarantee of $5,000.00. The minimum guarantee for the pool of contractors is $5,000 per contractor for the base period only, payable at the end of the first year after IDC award.

This MATOC is primarily for SWT and may be used within the SWD AOR. The MATOC will be predominately used to support vertical construction projects associated with the Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization and Military Construction projects. Projects that are military funded and include horizontal construction, will also be considered within scope. The primary area(s) of performance within the SWT AOR are military installations in Oklahoma and north Texas. Specific area(s) of performance will be identified at the time of individual task order award(s). Construction projects associated with the proposed MATOC will be DBB and DB projects.

The scope of this SWT/SWD MATOC includes, but is not limited to, design, new construction, repair, and/or alteration to sustain, restore, replace and/or modernize administration buildings, health facilities, warehouses office spaces, dormitories, dining facilities, aircraft hangars, classrooms, ancillary facilities or others as defined in the task order requirements.

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 495,000,000 Job MATOC Base Period (5-years)

FFP

Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for various types of fixed price task orders. The duration of this MATOC will be five (5) years -- a base ordering period of five (5) years with no (0) options. The MATOC will not exceed a cumulative total of $495,000,000 for all task orders awarded under this solicitation.

FOB: Destination

MAX

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

1.2 GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

1.3 COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

1.4 OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.5 SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

1.6 PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

1.7 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

1.8 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

1.9 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

1.10 PROPOSAL FORMAT

1.11 JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1.12 DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

1.13 U.S. CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

The market research analysis supports the establishment of an unrestricted solicitation with a Small Business Reserve IAW FAR 19.503, Reserves (a) & (b)(1). This strategy will provide a target of five (5) small businesses for the reserve, which could include one (1) Historically Underutilized Business Zone firm, one (1) Service-Disabled, Veteran-Owned Small Business firm, and one (1) Women-Owned Small Business firm, and a target of five (5) unrestricted firms with a total value of $495 million in shared contract capacity. The target of five Small Business awards for the reserve will be made to those Small Business firms evaluated as the best value contractors regardless of socioeconomic category. A socioeconomic category preference shall not apply during the source selection process. The acquisition incorporates the contract reserve process IAW FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i), Orders under Reserves. At the task order level, if the requirement under FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i) is not met, fair opportunity will be provided to all offerors within MATOC. The resulting Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDC), Multiple-Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) will utilize the best value trade-off process.

The MATOCs will have a 5-year base period with no options. The estimated amount of the shared contract capacity is $495 million.

This MATOC is primarily for SWT and may be used within the SWD AOR. The MATOC will be predominately used to support vertical construction projects associated with the Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization and Military Construction projects. Projects that are military funded and include horizontal construction, will also be considered within scope. The primary area(s) of performance within the SWT AOR are military installations in Oklahoma and north Texas. Specific area(s) of performance will be identified at the time of individual task order award(s). The resultant MATOC will have a target of 10 contract holders with a total shared capacity of $495,000,000.00. Construction projects associated with the proposed MATOC will be DBB and DB projects.

The scope of this SWT/SWD MATOC includes, but is not limited to, design, new construction, repair, and/or alteration to sustain, restore, replace and/or modernize administration buildings, health facilities, warehouses office spaces, dormitories, dining facilities, aircraft hangars, classrooms, ancillary facilities or others as defined in the task order requirements. See Section 01 00 00 for additional description of work.

1.2. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The offeror(s) must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Tulsa District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc.

ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located at 2488 E. 81st Street, Tulsa, OK 74137-4290, if it does not contain a return mailing address. There will be no exceptions.

USACE Tulsa District Point of Contact is Mr. Rudy Morales:

Phone: 918-669-7275 Email: rudolfo.morales@usace.army.mil

1.3. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and any amendments will be provided electronically. All solicitation documents will be posted through the System for Award Management (SAM) Contract Opportunities (formerly FedBizOpps/FBO) website at: https://sam.gov/content/home. Vendors seeking to do business with the Southwestern Division must complete a vendor registration on https://piee.eb.mil/, as you will be required to submit proposals through the PIEE Solicitation Module. Please note that it is imperative that the e-mail address you used to register in SAM.GOV MUST be the same e-mail address used to register in PIEE.

It shall be the offeror’s responsibility to check the SAM website for any amendments. The offeror shall read the solicitation and all amendments in their entirety and submit all requested information specified in this solicitation and all amendments. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

1.4. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

All contractual matters, questions and or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm no later than 10 calendar days prior to the proposal due date, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.

The bidder inquiry key for this project is QCPKNQ-7VG6W2 .

Instructions for registering in the ProjNet Bidder Inquiry system are available on the above website.

1.5. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

The NAICS Code selected for this project is 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, and the size standard is $39,500,000.00. Also see FAR 52.204-8.

1.6. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This request for proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal

1.7. SITE VISIT

The Government will not hold a site visit for the Base MATOC. All site visits will be held at the Task Order Level.

1.8. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments).

The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.9. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

1.9.1. The submittal method for proposals is electronic via PIEE ONLY (no mailed proposals).

The following email addresses must be entered for notification of proposal receipt and download availability:

rudolfo.morales@usace.army.mil julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil

1.9.2. Proposals will be received until the date and time and specified in this Request for Proposal. Mail all bonds to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District ATTN: CESWT-CT-E (Mr. Morales) 2488 E. 81st Street Tulsa, OK 74137-4290

1.9.3. The packaging shall be marked Solicitation Number: W912BV-22-R-0004.

1.10. PROPOSALS

See Section 00 22 00 for proposal requirements and formats.

Offer Closing Date: Please see Block 13 of the SF 1442 or as may be amended by SF30 Offer Closing Time:

1.11. JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a) or HubZone joint venture, the Offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

1.12. DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation are neither encouraged nor desired. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be rejected and thus ineligible for the award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these must be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

1.13. U.S. CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS

All contractor and subcontractor personnel working on this project must be U.S. citizens or documented U.S.

workers as specified in FAR 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification. Also, see Contract Clause 52.0000- 4515 Security Contract Language for All Corps of Engineers’ Unclassified Contracts. Individual Task Orders may require that all contractor and subcontractor personnel must be U.S. citizens.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

DEC 2021

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges--Identification of Subcontract Effort

OCT 2009

52.216-27 Single or Multiple Awards OCT 1995 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.222-33 Notice of Requirement for Project labor Agreement MAY 2010 52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction

Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.232-28 Invitation to Propose Performance-Based Payments MAR 2000 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.215-7010 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

JUL 2019

252.215-7012 Requirements for Submission of Proposals via Electronic Media.

JAN 2018

252.236-7006 Cost Limitation JAN 1997 252.236-7008 Contract Prices-Bidding Schedules DEC 1991

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-2 AVAILABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS

LISTED IN THE ACQUISITION STREAMLINING AND STANDARDIZATION INFORMATION SYSTEM

(ASSIST) (JUL 2021)

(a) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(1) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/);

(2) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/).

(b) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point (DoDSSP) by--

(1) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm);

(2) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(3) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone

(215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) IDC, with subsequent Task Orders that may include Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) , Fixed-Price Award Fee (FPAF), Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) Firm Target (FPIF) or Successive Targets (FPIS) resulting from this solicitation.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

U.S Army Corps of Engineers-Tulsa District Attention: Mr. A. Brian Brobson 2488 E. 81st Street Tulsa, OK 74137-4290

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (NOV 2020)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions

PHASE 1 SELECTION PROCEDURES

SECTION 00 22 00

PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.0 OVERVIEW OF PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.1 The market research analysis supports the establishment of an unrestricted solicitation with a Small Business Reserve IAW FAR 19.503, Reserves (a) & (b)(1). This strategy will provide a target of five (5) small businesses for the reserve, which could include one (1) Historically Underutilized Business Zone firm, one (1) Service-Disabled, Veteran-Owned Small Business firm, and one (1) Women-Owned Small Business firm, and a target of five (5) unrestricted firms with a total value of $495 million in shared contract capacity. The target of five Small Business awards for the reserve will be made to those Small Business firms evaluated as the best value contractors regardless of socioeconomic category. A socioeconomic category preference shall not apply during the source selection process. The acquisition incorporates the contract reserve process IAW FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i), Orders under Reserves. At the task order level, if the requirement under FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i) is not met, fair opportunity will be provided to all offerors within MATOC.

1.2 FAR 36.3, Two Phase Design Build Selection Procedures

1.2.1 Phase 1. In Phase 1 of the 2-phase design build selection procedure, interested firms or joint venture entities (referred to as “Offerors”) submit specified performance capability proposals, demonstrating their capability to successfully execute design-build construction and design-bid-build construction contracts resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and will select a maximum of 12 of the most highly qualified Phase 1 Offerors to compete for the MATOC contracts in Phase 2. Of the 12 most highly qualified Phase 1 Offerors, a maximum of six (6) small businesses will move forward to Phase 2 for the Small Business Reserve.

1.2.2 Phase 2. In Phase 2, the selected Offerors will submit proposals in accordance with the Section 00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD. The Government will evaluate the Phase 2 proposals in accordance with the criteria described in Section 00 22 00, which is provided as informational purposes only and subject to revision. The final version will be provided during the Phase 2 process.

1.3 Offerors will not be participating in a sealed bid procurement process under this acquisition method.

Issuance of this Request for Proposal does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government.

1.4 Proposal Submissions and the Trade-Off Process. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non- cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest-priced proposal. Offerors submit their performance and capability information for review and consideration by the Government. For those Offerors selected to compete during Phase 2, relative importance among technical factors are provided in Section 00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) reviews, evaluates, and rates the proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP.

A competitive range consisting of the most highly qualified technical Offerors will be established prior to discussions (if held; however, the Government does not intend to enter into discussions). The SSEB will review, evaluate and rate the initial task order project technical proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP for those Offerors included in the competitive range. Concurrently, the Government analyzes price proposals of Offerors utilizing the initial task order project price proposal. Price will not be rated but will be a factor in making the final best-value determination for award. The Government will review the proposals and rate the quality of each evaluation factor and subfactor (if any). The SSEB will rate each proposal against the specified evaluation criteria in the Solicitation requirements. They will not compare proposals at this time. After all proposals are rated, the Government will compare the ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages of proposals against each other .

The Source Selection Authority (SSA) compares proposals to one another and determines the best value for the government. The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal must merit the additional price, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented.

1.5 Initial Task Order Project. Those Offerors selected to compete during Phase 2 of the solicitation shall submit Technical and Price proposals for the initial task order as part of Phase 2 Proposal submittals. See Section 00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD. The scope of work for an initial task order project will be provided to Phase 2 Offerors in Section 01 10 00 TASK ORDER STATEMENT OF WORK. The initial task order project price proposal, which will be a combination of a seed task order price and a sample construction phase services task order price, will be used to evaluate price for the basic MATOC contracts.

The initial task order may be awarded to one of the most highly rated contractors in the MATOC pool if it is in the best interest of the Government.

1.6 Task Orders. Task orders shall be issued bilaterally against this MATOC as either Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Fixed-Price Award Fee (FPAF), Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) Firm Target (FPIF) or Successive Targets (FPIS) type contracts. Individual task orders will be competed among the contracts awarded under this MATOC pursuant to FAR 16.505. Each task order will be reviewed IAW FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i), Orders under Reserves. If the requirement under FAR 19.504(c)(1)(i) is not met, fair opportunity will be provided to the MATOC pool.

Generally, award will be made to the contractor that provides the best value to the Government, unless otherwise indicated.

1.7 Performance of Work. If the Contractor is awarded a contract, the contractor shall perform work in accordance with Section 01 00 00 BASE MATOC STATEMENT OF WORK, with the Scope of Work provided with each Task Order (Section 01 10 00 TASK ORDER STATEMENT OF WORK), and with strict accordance with the terms and conditions specified within the RFP and each Task Order.

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit: Firms formally organized as construction contractors, or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures as a partnership in accordance with FAR 9.601.

Offeror entities other than corporations must provide copies of its organizational papers with its proposal, including without limitation, any partnership agreements, joint venture agreements, operating agreements and articles of organization for limited liability companies, etc. Because this MATOC will have a target of five (5) Small Business (SB) concerns comprise a small business reserve within the MATOC, small businesses may submit. Additionally, large businesses may also submit to make up the desired total of ten (10) total contractors.

2.1.1 The size standard for this solicitation is as shown in Section 00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND

CERTIFICATIONS.

2.2 Where to Submit: Offerors shall submit their proposal to the Tulsa District at the address shown in Section

00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS.

2.3 Submission Deadline. Proposals shall be received by the Tulsa District no later than the time and date specified in Block 10 of Standard Form 1442, or as extended by amendment, if any.

2.4 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

2.4.1 In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failures to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror's evaluation. Offerors should provide sufficient detail and clearly define all items required in this section.

The Contracting Officer may remove any Offeror from further consideration during any phase of the procurement if the Offeror fails to meet the submittal requirements of the RFP or to reduce the competitive range for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2).

2.4.2 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as shown in paragraph 3.0, “Phase I Proposal Submittal Summary.”

2.4.3 Page Formatting for Submissions.

2.4.3.1 Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents.

Font size shall not be less than 10 point. Do not use condensed font. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches shall be used; 11 x 17 inch sheets will be counted as two 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch sheets.

2.4.3.2 A cover sheet shall be provided (see below). The second sheet shall be a Table of Contents. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration. The Government will not evaluate any information beyond the page limitation noted in the following paragraphs of this section.

2.4.4 Electronic Format: The Offeror shall provide the complete proposal in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file. The “find” feature within Adobe must be functional to search the proposal text. Do not scan or copy the documents into a .pdf file. The text portion of the proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file with bookmarks. Sections of the proposal shall be linked to the index in logical order.

2.4.5 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED” and shall show the date of revision. A revised copy of the entire proposal in .pdf format shall be provided.

2.4.6 “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal.

Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET FORMAT:

Solicitation Number: W912BV22R0004

Title: INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACTS (IDC) MULTIPLE AWARD TASK

ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) FOR DESIGN-BUILD OR DESIGN-BID-BUILD

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF VARIOUS MILITARY AND CIVIL

WORKS PROJECTS WITHIN THE SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION, TULSA

DISTRICT (SWT) BOUNDARIES OF THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Name, address, email address(es), telephone and facsimile number(s) of Offeror.

Company CAGE code, UEI (Unique Experience Identifier) number, and Federal ID number, Indicate Small Business, HUBZone, or Other than Small Business under used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data,”

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL SUMMARY

The Phase 1 proposal shall be tabbed and submitted in the following format. Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for each Tab are included in the following paragraphs. All information shall be provided within these tabbed sections and shall not be included as an appendix or attachment.

TABLE: Phase 1 Proposal Format

Location Factor Description Relative Importance

TAB A N/A

SF 1442

Proposal Data Sheet Accounting System Status

Not Rated

TAB B Factor 1 Past Performance Most Important Factor

TAB C Factor 2 Design and Construction Execution Approach 2nd Most Important Factor

(less important than Factor 1)

TAB D Factor 3 Organization/Management Team 3rd Most Important Factor

(less important than Factor 2)

TAB E N/A Financial Capacity Go/No Go

4.0 TAB A - STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1 Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror.

4.1.2 Submit a completed Proposal Data Sheet. See the form (Attachment 1) at the end of this section.

• If the offeror is a Joint Venture a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. All members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration.

• If the Offeror has teaming agreements and/or letters of commitment, include a copy.

4.1.3 Accounting System Status (Optional for Small Businesses)

• All Unrestricted firms will be required, at the base contract level and subsequently for each applicable task order, to have a certified cost accounting system that will permit timely development of all necessary cost data in the form required by all the types of contracts listed below in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 16. An audit report/letter IAW FAR Part 31 must be submitted by all unrestricted firms during the Phase I RFP proposal systems for evaluation. The types of contracts and task orders includes: Firm Fixed-Price (FFP), Fixed-Price Award Fee (FPAF), Fixed-Price Incentive Firm Target (FPIF); and Fixed-Price Incentive Successive Targets (FPIS) Contracts.

• Firms within the Small Business Reserve may submit proposals for actions that may require an adequate accounting system based on the contract type. These Small Business Reserve firms will not be required to have the above referenced certified accounting system, however, a Small Business

Reserve firm may not be awarded a task order that requires a certified accounting system if a fixed-price incentive type task order is contemplated, and an adequate certified accounting system has not been reviewed/approved and in place on the base contract. If a small business contemplates submitting proposals for a fixed price incentive type contract, it is highly recommended to submit certified accounting system documents IAW FAR part 16 and part 31 under the phase 1 RFP for the base MATOC contracts.

• The offeror shall provide a current audit/report/findings/letter and point of contact with phone number or e-mail address from the offeror’s Federal Government Cognizant Audit Agency or any commercially recognized auditing or accounting firm stating that the offeror’s accounting system is adequate for accumulating costs under the applicable Government contracts, if available. If it has been over twelve (12) months since the accounting system has been designated as adequate, the offeror shall also provide a statement that the accounting system has not changed since being approved.

• Unrestricted offerors will not be invited to phase two or be eligible for an Award (Except for the Small Business Reserve) without an audit/report/letter from a Federal Government Cognizant Audit Agency or any commercially recognized auditing or accounting firm stating that the offeror’s accounting system is adequate.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Above submission items are not rated.

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE

There are three aspects to the performance confidence evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality of past performance. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance shall be considered. Relevance and quality of performance will be combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each Offeror.

5.1 RECENCY OF PAST PERFORMANCE

The first aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine if the past performance is recent. Recent is defined as completed, or currently in progress with at least 50% construction completed, within the past five (5) years as of the date the solicitation was issued.

5.2 RELEVANCY OF PAST PERFORMANCE

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how relevant the past performance is.

Relevant projects means a minimum value of $20,000,000 or greater ($7,000,000 or greater for Small Business Reserve). Projects submitted should reflect Design-Build, Preconstruction Services, and Construction experience in various types of construction-related work, including new construction, alterations, renovations and repairs, and design-build construction as described in Section 01 00 00 BASE MATOC STATEMENT OF WORK, paragraph

3.0. The Offeror’s past performance will be evaluated to determine technical capability to perform the proposed contract and how well it satisfied its customers. The information presented in the Offeror’s proposal, together with that from other sources available to the Government, will comprise the input for evaluation of this factor. The following list is indicative of the variety of work that may be performed by task orders under this contract. Items that may be evaluated with greater relevancy include, but are not limited to:

• PROJECTS

Designed for and constructed for the Corps of Engineers or other DoD Components.

Experience with task-order-type contracts Fully completed projects rather than partially or substantially complete projects Projects that demonstrate experience of team members commensurate with their proposed role on this project.

Projects with a value greater than $20M (greater than $7M for Small Business Reserve) Projects that demonstrate capability to provide and manage preconstruction services to include providing conceptual cost estimates, evaluation of design documents for constructability, identification of construction related problems or errors in design, recommendations on construction feasibility, guidance on factors related to construction costs including estimates of alternative designs or materials and possible economies, and value engineering services .

• SAFETY - Life safety upgrades, inflammatory gases and substances, industrial safety, industrial hygiene, fire protection, airfield pavements, confined-space entry, radioactive and laser operations, hazardous materials, protection of work sites and property, and protection of workers.

• CIVIL - Ability to provide minor civil work (e.g., excavations, utility work, etc.) in support of plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work.

• ARCHITECTURAL – Ability to provide architectural repairs and/or modifications in support of plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work.

• ENVIRONMENTAL - Removal and disposal of asbestos, lead-based paint, underground storage tanks, lighting ballast, transformers and other hazardous materials to support plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work.

• STRUCTURAL – Ability to provide structural engineering, repairs and/or modifications to support plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work.

• INSTRUMENTATION - Instrumentation for energy monitoring and control systems, direct digital control and fire protection.

• COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS - Conventional communication systems and fiber optics to support plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work.

• SECURITY - Facility security systems; anti-terrorism/force protection measures to support plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work.

• ELECTRICAL - Ability to provide electrical engineering, replacement, repairs and/or modifications to existing facilities in support of plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (HVAC) work

• MECHANICAL – Ability to provide mechanical engineering and construction for replacement, repairs, and/or modifications to facility heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC), and plumbing systems.

• PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES – Providing conceptual cost estimates, review and evaluation of design documents for constructability, identification of construction related problems or errors in design or design documentation, recommendations on construction feasibility, guidance on factors related to construction costs including estimates of alternative designs or materials and possible economies, and value engineering services .

5.3 QUALITY OF PAST PERFORMANCE

The third aspect of past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance.

The Government determines the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. Evaluation will include, but is not limited to, the extent to which the offeror attained applicable goals for small business participation under contracts that required subcontracting plans, if applicable.

5.4 PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

The past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance. It will be based on the past performance of the firms or that of its predecessor, as defined in FAR 52.204-20, if applicable. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its key personnel apart from that of the entity.

5.4.1 In the case of firms for which there is no information on past contract performance, or where past contract performance information is not available, or has been determined not to be recent or relevant, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv).) In this case, the firm’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “neutral.” Although the Government may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine, that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent with the stated solicitation criteria.

5.5 OFFEROR’S SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The Offeror shall submit up to ten (10) completed projects demonstrating the offeror’s recent and relevant experience using the Project Information Worksheet – (Attachment 2) at the end of this section. For each of the projects submitted, to ensure the agency has all relevant past performance information, the Offeror shall submit copies of Federal/DoD/Navy/Army performance reviews that are likely already in the agency’s databases or likely within the agency’s arm’s reach (i.e., Contractor’s copy of CPARS evaluations)

5.5.1 For each project that does not have a CPARS evaluation, offerors shall provide a Past Performance Questionnaire form PPQ-0 (Attachment 4) to a representative of the owner that can provide the owner’s opinion of the Offeror’ s past performance for the project. The Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) and sample transmittal letter (Attachment 3) included in the solicitation are provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the owner for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the owner point of contact. There is no page limit for this factor.

5.5.2 Form PPQ-0 shall be utilized, and offerors shall submit the PPQ with their proposal submission to the Contracting Office designated proposal submission location. The Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer will not require the PPQ to be sent directly from the owner. The Offeror may submit the completed PPQ-0. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from an owner for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and owner information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with owners/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the owner requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’ s point of contact shown in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS and on the PPQ-0 form via email prior to proposal closing date. If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the Contract Specialist shown in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS. All PPQs must be submitted prior to the proposal closing date.

5.5.3 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

5.5.4 The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the completed questionnaires are submitted by the closing date.

The Government may contact and interview the owner’ s representative on the Past Performance questionnaires and reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the owners, if the owner’ s representative is not available.

5.5.5 The Government will evaluate the responses from the customers from which Past Performance Questionnaires have been received. The Government may contact and interview points of contact on the Past Performance Questionnaires. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed references, if the listed reference is not available. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance.

5.5.6 Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

5.5.7 To improve accuracy of database searches, the Offeror must also provide the CAGE Codes for the prime contractor and all teaming partners (i.e., design firms, key subcontractors, Joint Venture Partners).

5.5.8 The Government may contact references for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

5.5.9 Joint Ventures. If Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, the proposal shall clearly identify the contractual responsibilities of each firm and the work to be performed by each;

describe the nature of the association; indicate whether the firms have experience working together in construction ventures, including how long and how many projects. In addition, each company, including joint ventures, shall list their Government contract experience. Provide a copy of the commitment letter of the firms or the Joint Venture Agreement. Prior to award of any contract, a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement will be required. If approval of the Joint Venture Agreement is required by the Small Business Administration (SBA), failure to timely provide an approved Small Business Administration Joint Venture Agreement may prevent award of a contract.

i. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a Unique Experience Identifier (UEI) number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as the offering Joint Venture.

The Offeror shall submit up to ten (10) "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV's ability to perform the work required in this solicitation.

ii. If the Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the JV, the Offeror must provide those

"recent", "relevant" projects that it has performed as the JV, and then supplement the record with additional "recent", "relevant" projects performed by each JV member in their individual capacities. In such instance, each JV member may individually submit up to five (5) projects, to exclude any performed as the JV.