amendment0004.pdf
PDF 34 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912BV-17-R-0018
About this file
Amendment 0004
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| amendment0001.pdf | ||
| solicitation.pdf | ||
| 100__Plans.pdf | ||
| Canton_Blaine_Park_Remediation-Various_Improvements_Specs.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Summary of Changes by Amendment 0004
1. The SF1442 has been revised from 10 copies of proposals to 1.
2.. Sheet CS-551.1 replaces CS-551. Revised sheet includes a sketch of the access panel in the toe drain pipe.
3.. Appendices A, B, C, & D have been included in the specifications. Appendices provide geotechnical information.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 20-Apr-2017
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV-17-R-0018
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
22-Mar-2017
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
24-Apr-2017
CODE
CONTRACTING DIV
USACE, TULSA 1645 S 101 E AVE
TULSA OK 74128-4609
W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOLICITATION NO. W912BV-17-R-0018
CANTON BLAINE PARK REMEDIATION/VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS
CANTON LAKE, OKLAHOMA
APRIL 19, 2017
TOC-1
Revised by Amendment 0004
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
00 11 00 SF 1442 AND CLIN SCHEDULE
00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, & NOTICES TO OFFERORS
00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA,
BASIS OF AWARD
00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
00 72 00 CONTRACT CLAUSES
00 73 00 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
00 73 46 WAGE DETERMINATION SCHEDULE
DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
01 00 00 SUMMARY OF WORK
01 22 00 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
01 32 01 PROJECT SCHEDULE
01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL
01 46 00 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)
01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
01 57 20 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
01 58 00 BULLETIN BOARD, PROJECT SIGN, AND SAFETY SIGN
01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS
DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
02 41 00 DEMOLITION
DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE
03 30 00 CONCRETE
DIVISION 05 - METALS
05 50 00 BOLLARDS
DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL
26 56 00 SOLAR POWERED SECURITY LIGHTS AND POLES
DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK
31 00 00 EARTHWORK
31 05 22 GEOTEXTILES USED AS FILTERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOLICITATION NO. W912BV-17-R-0018
CANTON BLAINE PARK REMEDIATION/VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS
CANTON LAKE, OKLAHOMA
APRIL 19, 2017
TOC-2
Revised by Amendment 0004
DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
32 00 00 WORK COVERED UNDER OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2009 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION
32 92 23 BERMUDA SOD
32 92 26 BERMUDA SPRIGGING
DIVISION 35 - WATERWAY AND MARINE CONSTRUCTION
35 22 77 FLAP GATES AND MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS
35 31 19 STONE PROTECTION AND FILTER MATERIAL
35 59 43 WATERWAY BARRIERS (BOOMS)
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – EMBANKMENT BORINGS & CPT DATA
APPENDIX B – AUXILIARY SPILLWAY CHANNEL BORINGS
APPENDIX C – EXCAVATABILITY REPORT
APPENDIX D – PIEZOMETER PLOTS
-- End of Table of Contents --
APPENDIX A
Embankment Borings & CPT Data
1,540
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
300 1,000900800700600400
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
2001000
1,590
1,585
500 1,100
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
STA. 32+00 TO STA. 40+00
200' D/S
SEEP-155/SEEP-193/SEEP-189
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
E le va tio n (fe et
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
1,540
1,580
1,0003000 100 1,100200 400 500 600 700
FRICTION
(tsf)
100 200 300 400
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
048 4
SEEP-193
3-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
SEEP-155
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-189
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
200 1,2001,1001,000900800700600500 1,3003001000
1,585
1,580
STA. 48+00 TO STA. 56+00
200' D/S
SEEP-160/SEEP-156/SEEP-91
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
E le va tio n (fe et
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
1,555
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
500 1,3001,2001,1001,000900800
1,565
1,575
4003002001000 700
1,545
1,570
1,560
1,550
1,545
1,540
1,585
1,580
1,550
1,555
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,540
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
P E
A T
310 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) -1100 200 300 400
SEEP-91
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
-1
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
5432 1
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
100 200 300 400
SEEP-156
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8 2100 200 300 400
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
P E
A T
-1
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
SEEP-160
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E
1,000
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,580
1,585
0 200 400 800
1,545
1,200 1,400 1,600
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
STA. 70+00 TO STA. 81+00
200' D/S
SEEP-182/SEEP-145
1,600
1,585
1,580
0 200 400 600 800 1,000
1,555
1,400
1,550
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545 1,200
00 5
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-182
100 200 300 400 -1 21 2 4
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
S A
N D
S
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
100 200 300 400
SEEP-145
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
048 0 4 8
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
5-1 430 4 8
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
1,590
800700600500400300200100 900
1,585
1,580
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
1,100
STA. 81+00 TO STA. 90+00
200' D/S
SEEP-145/SEEP-150/SEEP-174
1,000
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
E le va tio n (fe et
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
1,550
1,200
1,575
1,560
1,2001,1001,000900800
1,585
1,580
4003002001000 700
1,550
1,565
1,555
1,545
1,5401,540
1,590
1,570
1,555
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,545
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
S A
N D
S
420 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) -1100 200 300 400
SEEP-174
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
-1
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
100 200 300 400
SEEP-145
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8 2
100 200 300 400
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
P E
A T
-1
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
SEEP-150
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E
7006005004003002001000 800
1,595
1,585
1,580
STA. 90+00 TO STA. 98+00
200' D/S
SEEP-174/SEEP-161/SEEP-171
1,000
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
E le va tio n (fe et
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
1,550
1,100
1,575
1,560
1,000900800700600
1,585
1,580
2001000
1,590
1,595
1,550
1,565
1,555
1,545
1,5401,540 1,100
1,570
1,555
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,545
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
S A
N D
S
420 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) -1100 200 300 400
SEEP-174
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
-1
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
100 200 300 400
SEEP-161
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8 2
100 200 300 400
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
P E
A T
-1
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
SEEP-171
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E
900800700600500400300200 1,0000
1,595
1,590
1,585
100 1,100
1,580
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
E le va tio n (fe et
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
1,560
1,200
1,570
1,2001,1001,000900800
1,590
1,585
4003002001000 700
1,555
1,565
1,555
1,550
1,5451,545
1,595
1,575
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,580
1,550
STA. 98+00 TO STA. 106+00
200' D/S
SEEP-171/SEEP-163/SEEP-167
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
0 4 8
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
048 1-1100 200 300 400
SEEP-171
FRICTION
(tsf)
3 1
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
0 4 8
-1100 200 300 400
SEEP-163
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
-1
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
100 200 300 400
SEEP-167
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
1,565
1,600
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,570
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,575
1,545
400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
1,200
1,600
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
0 200 400 600 1,545
1,000 1,400 1,600
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
E le va tio n (fe et
STA. 106+00 TO STA. 118+00
200' D/S
SEEP-167/SEEP-128
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-167
100 200 300 400 -1
-1
1 2 4
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
100 200 300 400
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf) 0 4 8
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
C
LA
Y
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-128
FRICTION
(tsf)
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S
IL
T M
IX
1,590
1,580
1,575
1,565
1,540
1,545
1,550
1,555
1,570
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
900800
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
4003002001000 700
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
STA. 28+00 to STA. 36+00
TOE
SEEP-44/SEEP-33/SEEP-5
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
1,540
1,595
800600
5004003002001000 900
100 200 300 400
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
0 4 8
SEEP-44
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-05
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-33
100 200 300 400 -1 1
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S
IL
T M
IX
1,545
1,550
1,555
1,560
1,540
1,570
1,575
1,565
5003002001000
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,000
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 36+00 TO STA. 44+00
TOE
SEEP-5/SEEP-23/SEEP-45
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
900800700600
1,595
1,570
1,540
1,545
1,550
1,555
1,565
1,575
1,580
1,585
1,590
1,560
1,000900
1,580
700500400300100 200
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
100 200 300 400
0 4 8
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-23
100 200 300 400 -1 0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
0480 4 8
SEEP-45
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-05
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S A
N D
S
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S
IL
T M
IX
2001000
1,580
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,545
1,550
1,555
1,560
500 600 700 800 900 1,000
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 44+00 TO STA. 52+00
TOE
SEEP-45/SEEP-46/SEEP-47
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
1,000900800700600500400300200100
100 200 300 400
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-47
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-45
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-46
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,545
1,550
1,555
500 600 700 800 900 1,000
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 52+00 TO STA. 60+00
TOE
SEEP-47/SEEP-48/SEEP-49
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
2000 100 300
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
1,000900800700600500400300200100
-1 100 200 300 400
SEEP-47
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-49
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
100 200 300 400 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-48
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,550
1,585
1,580
1,545
1,555
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,540
600 700 800
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 60+00 TO STA. 66+00
TOE
SEEP-49/SEEP-147/SEEP-63
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
400300
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
1,540
7006005004003002001000
FRICTION
(tsf)
100 200 300 400
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-63
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
SEEP-147
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-49
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,555
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,560
1,545
1,550
1,565
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 66+00 TO STA. STA. 74+00
TOE
SEEP-63/SEEP-146/SEEP-52
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
400100 500300200
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
6005004003002001000
-1100 200 300 400
SEEP-146
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-63
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
100 200 300 400 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-52
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,565
1,585
1,590
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,545
1,550
1,555
1,560
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 74+00 TO STA. 87+00
TOE
SEEP-52/SEEP-17/SEEP-43
E le va tio n (fe et
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
1,6001,4001,2001,0008006004002000 1,800
100 200 300 400
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-52
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-17
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-43
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,595
1,585
1,580
1,570
1,560
1,545
1,550
1,555
1,565
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 87+00 TO STA. 94+00
TOE
SEEP-43/SEEP-42/SEEP-41
E le va tio n (fe et
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,545
7006005004003002001000
FRICTION
(tsf)
100 200 300 400
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
048 4
SEEP-43
3-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
SEEP-41
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-42
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,585
1,580
1,570
1,550
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,575
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
STA. 94+00 TO STA. 102+00
TOE
SEEP-41/SEEP-40/SEEP-39
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
E le va tio n (fe et
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,0009008007006005004003002001000
048100 200 300 400
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
048 4
SEEP-41
3-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-39
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
0 4 8
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-40
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,560
1,565
1,555
1,550
1,570
E le va tio n (fe et
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
STA. 102+00 TO STA. 111+00
TOE
SEEP-39/SEEP-30/SEEP-35
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550 1,000
1,100
900800700600500400300200100
100 200 300 400
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
0 4 8
SEEP-39
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-30
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-35
100 200 300 400 -1 1
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S
IL
T M
IX
1,605
1,600
1,595
1,590
1,580
1,550
1,555
1,560
1,565
1,570
1,575
1,585
STA. 111+00 TO STA. 122+00
TOE
SEEP-35/SEEP-38/SEEP-129
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
E le va tio n (fe et
1,600
1,595
1,590
1,585
1,580
1,575
1,570
1,565
1,560
1,555
1,550
1,605
1,6001,4001,200
1,0008006004002000
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
100 200 300 400
0 4 8
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
SEEP-38
-1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
FRICTION
(tsf)
P E
A T
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-129
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2 3 4 5
C
LA
Y
S A
N D
S
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
0 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-35
100 200 300 400 -1 1 2
S
IL
T M
IX
1,605
1,600
1,595
1,590
1,610
1,580
1,570
1,565
1,585
1,585
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
5500 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
1,575
1,565
600 650
1,610
1,605
1,600
1,595
1,590
1,580
1,570
Distance Along Baseline (feet)
CANTON LAKE
CPT SECTIONS
E le va tio n (fe et
TD
_C
P T_
FE
N
C E
_1 1X
C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
F N
C A
B G
N G
N
.G D
T
3/
/0
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
OCT 2007
STA. 122+00 TO STA. 126+00
TOE
SEEP-129/SEEP-118
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
P E
A T
S A
N D
S
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
C
LA
Y
3 4048 21-1100 200 300 400
SEEP-129
FRICTION
(tsf)
30 4 8
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
SEEP-118
100 200 300 400 -1
S A
N D
S /G
R A
V E
LS
CONE
RESISTANCE
(tsf)
4 5
C
LA
Y
S
IL
T M
IX
E
S
S A
N D
S
P E
A T
S A
N D
M
IX
E S
0 4 8
CONE RESISTANCE
(tsf) ELEV.
(feet)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1799104.586 ft
FRICTION
(tsf)
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
K. Konecny
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
DRILLED BY:PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 399863.648 ft
X-Section 8 @ STA. 119
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-128
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
2 4 60 8
DEPTH
(feet)
8/19/2006
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:
ELEV.
(feet)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900 1 2 3 4
P ea t
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
Berm
DEPTH
(feet)
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
K. Konecny 8/19/2006
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
S ilt
M ix tu re s
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
C la ys
50 100 150 200 250 300 3500 400
Soil Classification
Number
X-Section 9 @ STA. 122+00 North = 400231.032 ft
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, Oklahoma
PROJECT:
CONE RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
(tsf)
2 4 60 8
East = 1799564.679 ft
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
LOG OF SEEP-129
0 40050 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
ELEV.
(feet)
East = 1795990.006 ft
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
8/21/2006
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
K. Konecny
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 397789.035 ft
X-Section 5 @ STA. 81+00
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-145
1 2 3
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
0 4
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
(feet)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1795006.833 ft
FRICTION
(tsf)
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
K. Konecny
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
DRILLED BY:PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 397254.986 ft
STA. 70+00 @ D/S Toe
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-146
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
1 2 30 4
DEPTH
(feet)
8/21/2006
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
ELEV.
(feet)
0 1 2 3 4 1580
Pore Pressure
(psi)
S an d M ix tu re s
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
P ea t
2 4 60 8
East = 1794418.381 ft
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
LOG OF SEEP-147
FRICTION
(tsf)
PROJECT:
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
Berm
2 4 60 8
DEPTH
(feet)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
S ilt
M ix tu re s
8/21/2006K. Konecny
DRILLED BY: DATE DRILLED:
C la ys
CONE RESISTANCE
(tsf)
S an ds
0 400
Soil Classification
Number
STA. 63+00 @ D/S Toe
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
North = 396852.05 ft Seepage Berm
Canton Lake, Oklahoma
Pore Pressure
(psi) ELEV.
(feet)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900 1 2 3 4
FRICTION
(tsf)
P ea t
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
1 2 30
CONE RESISTANCE
(tsf)
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s C la ys
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
K. Konecny 8/22/2006
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
East = 1796559.41 ft
S an d M ix tu re s
50 100 150 200 250 300 3500 400
Soil Classification
Number
X-Section 6 @ STA. 89+00 North = 398010.81 ft
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, Oklahoma
DEPTH
(feet)
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
2 4 60 8
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
LOG OF SEEP-150
PROJECT:
0 40050 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
ELEV.
(feet)
East = 1795841.02 ft
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
12/14/2002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
C. Sloan
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 397877.13 ft
STA. 80+50 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-17
2 4 6
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
0 8
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
1 2 30 4
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
ilt
M ix tu re s
LOG OF SEEP-182U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
East = 1795089.812 ft PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 397133.141 ft
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
C la ys
S an d M ix tu re s
S an ds
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
3/20/2007
STA. 70+00 (200') (P-25)
400 80 2 4 6
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
FRICTION
(tsf)
0.5 1.0 1.50 20
K. Konecny
ELEV.
(feet)
DEPTH
(feet)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9050 100 150 200 250 300 350
DRILLED BY: DATE DRILLED:
Berm
P ea t
ELEV.
(feet)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900 1 2 3 4
Pore Pressure
(psi)
P ea t
CONE RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60
DEPTH
(feet)
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s C la ys
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
K. Konecny 8/3/2007
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
20 40 60 80 100 120 1400 160
Soil Classification
Number
STA. 40+00 (200') P-10
North = 395436.436 ft
PROJECT:
FRICTION
(tsf)
East = 1792552.177 ft
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
2 4 60 8
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
LOG OF SEEP-189
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, Oklahoma
ELEV.
(feet)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900 1 2 3 4
Pore Pressure
(psi)
P ea t
CONE RESISTANCE
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
Berm
DEPTH
(feet)
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
K. Konecny 8/4/2007
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
S ilt
M ix tu re s
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
C la ys
50 100 150 200 250 300 3500 400
Soil Classification
Number
STA. 36+00 (200') (P-8)
North = 395238.15 ft
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, Oklahoma
PROJECT:
FRICTION
(tsf)
2 4 60 8
East = 1792237.745 ft
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
LOG OF SEEP-193
(feet)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1792464.76 ft
FRICTION
(tsf)
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
C. Sloan
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
DRILLED BY:PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 395629.63 ft
STA. 40+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-23
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
2 4 60 8
DEPTH
(feet)
12/15/2002
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90400
(tsf)
ELEV.
(feet)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
East = 1791771.27 ft
2 4 6
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
12/15/2002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
C. Sloan
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 395235.01 ft
STA. 32+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-33
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
(tsf)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 904
ELEV.
(feet)
PROJECT:
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
LOG OF SEEP-39
1 2 3
East = 1797615.95 ft C. Sloan
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 399086.5 ft
STA. 102+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
DEPTH
(feet)
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
12/16/2002
1 2 30 4
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
FRICTION
(tsf)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 904
ELEV.
(feet)
PROJECT:
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
LOG OF SEEP-41
1 2 3
East = 1796939.22 ft C. Sloan
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 398658.43 ft
STA. 94+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
DEPTH
(feet)
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
12/16/2002
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
FRICTION
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
(tsf)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
ELEV.
(feet)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1796364.5 ft
2 4 6
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
12/16/2002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
C. Sloan
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 398258.67 ft
STA. 87+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-43
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
(tsf)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
ELEV.
(feet)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1791429.89 ft
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
DRILLED BY:PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 395026.29 ft
STA. 28+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-44
FRICTION
(tsf)
2 4 6
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
0 8
DEPTH
(feet)
12/17/2002C. Sloan
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:
(tsf)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
ELEV.
(feet)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1792803.11 ft
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
DRILLED BY:PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 395849.89 ft
STA. 44+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-45
FRICTION
(tsf)
2 4 6
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
0 8
DEPTH
(feet)
12/17/2002C. Sloan
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:
0 40050 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
ELEV.
(feet)
East = 1793138.35 ft
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
12/17/2002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
C. Sloan
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 396068.13 ft
STA. 48+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-46
2 4 6
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
0 8
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90400
(tsf)
ELEV.
(feet)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
East = 1793466.09 ft
2 4 6
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
12/17/2002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
C. Sloan
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 396297.63 ft
STA. 52+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-47
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
(tsf)
Pore Pressure
(psi)
ELEV.
(feet)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1794135.7 ft
2 4 6
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
12/17/2002
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
C. Sloan
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 396735.44 ft
STA. 60+00 @ D/S TOE
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-49
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
0 40050 100 150 200 250 300 350 1580
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
ELEV.
(feet)
East = 1794705.02 ft
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
8/11/2006
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
K. Konecny
PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 397020.193 ft
STA. 66+30 @ D/S Toe
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-63
0.5 1.0 1.5
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
0 2
DEPTH
(feet) S an ds a nd
G ra ve ls
FRICTION
(tsf)
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
2 4 60 8
DATE DRILLED:DRILLED BY:
(feet)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pore Pressure
(psi)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
East = 1794021.963 ft
FRICTION
(tsf)
S an ds a nd G ra ve ls
S an ds
S an d M ix tu re s
C la ys
P ea t
Berm
S ilt
M ix tu re s
K. Konecny
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
TULSA DISTRICT
DRILLED BY:PROJECT:
Seepage Berm Canton Lake, OklahomaNorth = 396447.958 ft
X-Section 3 @ STA. 57+00
Soil Classification
Number
0 1 2 3 4
LOG OF SEEP-91
C P
T C
A N
TO
N
_C P
T.
G
P J
T D
.G D
T
6/ 6/
2 4 60 8
DEPTH
(feet)
8/13/2006
FRICTION
RATIO (%)
APPENDIX B
Auxiliary Spillway Channel Borings
P O E
H
V
H
V
H V
H V
2H:1V
2H:1V
H
V
2H:1V
2H:1V
H
V
PZ-1
03-10
04-10
PZ-3
02-10
PZ-4
07-10
09-10
08-10
PZ-506-10
05-10
E-05
01-10
D-WALL 6
B 7-08
B-6/06
D-WALL 7
B 6-08 S-05
E-06
B 5-08 S-03A
S-08
CUT-0FF WALL 5+00/09
B-4/06
B 4-08
B 3-08
S-01
S-07
S-06
B 2-08
S-04A
D-WALL 8
B 1-08
B-5/06
E-07
S-08
E-06
B-4/06
PZ-5
01-10
D-WALL 6
B 1-08
E-08
S-02B
10-10
NORTH
SOUTH
NORTH
PW-1
PW-2
CUT-0FF WALL 2+00/09
PW-3
E-01
E-03
E-02
E-04
B-2/06
E-10
E-11
E-12
E-13
E-14
E-09
B-8/06
B-7/06
B-9/06
CUT-0FF WALL 5+00/09
PIEZOMETER NEAR BENTONITE SLURRY WALL
SW-1 2007 SLURRY WALL BORINGS
SW-6
PZ-2
SW-5
SW-4
SW-3
SW-2
SW-1
2004 STRUCTURE BORING
2004 CHANNEL BORING
2006 STRUCTURE BORING
DESIGN BORING
2008 DIAPHRAGM WALL
2009 CONSTRUCTION BORING
2010 NORTH WALL EXT. & PLUG BORINGS
TCP LOCATION
EXISTING INCLINOMETERI
I
I
P
P
P
09A-10
B
B
E
E
C
C
D D
F
F
G
H
H
G 07-10
TEST PIT
A
APPENDICES.
ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THE SPECIFICATION
2. PIEZOMETER READINGS FOR PZ-1 THROUGH PZ-5
WITHIN THE SPECIFICATION APPENDICES.
1. DETAILS OF THE TEST PIT EXCAVATION IS INCLUDED
NOTES:
WALL BEGINS 2+32
EXISTING NORTH DIAPHRAGM
E X I S
T I N
G
R
A V I T
Y
W
L L
B E
G I
R
H
L
I G
N M
E N
T
+0
1+
2+0
3+00
4+00
+0
(SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION A-A)
ALONG ALIGNMENT OF NORTH WALL EXTENSION
SEE SHEET B102 FOR SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION
PLAN OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
B101
0 100 200
SCALE OF FEET
N
AS SHOWN
CL12EX-b101-boreplan b101.dgn
"DRAWING OF WORK AS-BUILT"
A
B
C
D
123456
D
C
B
6 5 4 3
DWG. CODE:
NUMBER
REFERENCE
SHEET
INVITATION NO.
CONTRACT NO.SHEET OF
US Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District
Tulsa, Oklahoma
CONTRACT DATE:PLOT SCALE:
PLOT DATE:
DESIGN FILE:
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPR
DESIGNED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DRAWN BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED NORTH CANADIAN RIVER, OKLAHOMA
CANTON LAKE
AUXILIARY SPILLWAY
CHANNEL EXCAVATIION PHASE II
BLACKMORE
NONE
MAR 2014
J WALDIE
W912-BV-14-R-0039
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DAM SAFETY PROD CTR
MARK A. LOCKE, P.E
W912BV-14-C-0027
FY:2014
P O E
C C
C
C
C C
C
B
+0
+0
+0
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00
45+00
45+28
CC
+0
+0
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
C C
C
C
C C
C
B
POE 45+27.97
POE 40+34.39
BA
AA
A
B
2+0
3+00
4+00
P O E
C C
C
C
C C
C
B
+0
+0
+0
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00
45+00
45+28
CC
+0
+0
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
C C
C
C
C C
C
B
POE 45+27.97
POE 40+34.39
BA
AA
A
B
2+0
3+00
4+00
H
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
2H:1V 2H:1V
2H:1V 2H:1V
H
V
H
V
2H:1V 2H:1V
2H:1V 2H:1V
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
H
V
H
V
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
3+001+000+00 1,560
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
LEGEND
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Topsoil border line lean clay-silt SPT= Standard Penetration Test
(uncorrected blow counts)
RQD= Rock Quality Designation (%)
4+002+00
Silty Sand
Silt
Gravel Clay, Low Plasticity
Augured without sampling
Clay Shale (Mudstone) Siltstone/Silty Shale
3 6 9
15 20 22
29 50+/0.3
05-10
SPT
RQD(%)
U.C.=40 psi
2 9 10
4 9 22
06-10
SPT
RQD(%)
U.C.=80 psi
19 31 50+/0.4
10 15 23
5 10 10
9 8 14
10 21 25
07-10
SPT
RQD(%)
08-10
SPT
RQD(%)
5 15 15
3 3 4
3 6 9
12 18 28
38 50+/0.4
U.C.=80 psi
4 10 10
4 6 6
5 6 7
3 3 6
3 4 7
1 3 4
3 4 5
3 2 2
4 10 10
3 2 1
1 1 1
1 1 3
09-10
SPT
36 50+/0.4
09A-10
RQD(%)
12 12 14
3 4 5
2 1 2
3 3 5
2 3 5
4 9 10
4 9 10
4 9 12
4 5 7
21 30 31
29 50+/0.2
10-10
SPT
RQD(%)
U.C.=30 psi
.0
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
1,660
1,670
U.C.=128 psi; E=-0.07E6 psi
U.C.=67 psi; E=-0.02E6psi
U.C.=43 psi; E=-0.01E6 psi
U.C.=177 psi; E=-0.08E6 psi
U.C.= Unconfined Compressive Strength (psi)
E=Young's Modulus (psi)
7 11 12
8 10 15
5 15 22
13 18 39
50/6"
D-Wall No. 6
SPTRQD(%)
Shale Water Table at Time of Drilling
EXISTING DIAPHRAGM WALL
TOP OF CAP BEAM FOR
5+00
EXISTING RETAINING WALL
D I A
P H
R A
M
L L
B
G I
X I S
T I N
G
R E
T A I N I
L L
D
X I S
T I N
G
NEAR WALL ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL BOTTOM
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION A-A
B102
Subsurface Cross Section A-A
CL12EX-b102-sec-a_b102.dgn
Sub Surface Data Along North Wall Alignment
EXISTING EXCAVATION LINE
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
FROM WATER LEVELS OBSERVED
DRILLING PROFILES MAY VARY
WATER LEVELS SHOWN IN
"DRAWING OF WORK AS-BUILT"
A
B
C
D
123456
D
C
B
REFERENCE
SHEET
INVITATION NO.
CONTRACT NO.SHEET OF
US Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District
Tulsa, Oklahoma
CONTRACT DATE:PLOT SCALE:
PLOT DATE:
DESIGN FILE:
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPR
DESIGNED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DRAWN BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED NORTH CANADIAN RIVER, OKLAHOMA
J WALDIE
W912-BV-14-R-0039
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DAM SAFETY PROD CTR
MARK A. LOCKE, P.E
W912BV-14-C-0027
FY:2014
1,550
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,550
1,560
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200
2 9 10
4 9 22
10 15 23
19 31 50+/0.4
06-10
SPT
RQD(%)
U.C.(psi)
SW-2
RQD(%)
SW-3
SW-4
RQD(%)
SW-5
RQD(%)
SW-6
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
E-01 E-02
LEGEND
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Topsoil
Shale border line lean clay-silt
Sandstone
Baseline (feet)
SPT= Standard Penetration Test
(uncorrected blow counts)
RQD= Rock Quality Designation (%)
U.C.= Unconfined Compressive Strength (psi)
T D
F E
N C
E
S P
T
R Q
A N
T
C
R
U R
L L .G
J
1,300
RQD(%)
RQD(%)
WLL PL %FI
WLL PL %FI
Siltstone/Silty Shale
Silt
Clay shale (mudstone)
Clay, Low Plasticity Augered without sampling
Silty Clayey Sand
Sandy Clay, Low Plasticity
Silty Sand
LL= Liquid Limit
PL= Plastic Limit
%FI= Percent - 200 (%)
W= Water Content (%)
35 18 16.7 91
42 17 16.2 85
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
5 11 13
3 4 6
27 50+/0.3
02-10
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
10 12 12
1 1 2
15 42 50+/0.3
39 50+/0.4
03-10
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
3 2 3
7 14 19
15 50+/0.3
20 22 38
12 20 28
15 20 25
04-10
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
3 6 9
15 20 22
29 50+/0.3
05-10
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
LEGEND
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Siltstone Topsoil
Baseline (feet)
SPT= Standard Penetration Test
(uncorrected blow counts)
RQD= Rock Quality Designation (%)
U.C.= Unconfined Compressive Strength (psi)
T D
F E
N C
E
S P
T
R
A N
T
R
U R
L L .G
Silt Clay shale (mudstone)
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION C-C
1,590
1,595
1,600
1,605
1,610
1,615
1,620
1,625
1,630
1,635
1,640
1,645
1,650
1,655
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 1,590
1,595
1,600
1,605
1,610
1,615
1,620
1,625
1,630
1,635
1,640
1,645
1,650
1,655
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
37.4
43.4
NP
NP
NP
NP
34.1
29.2
W phi'LL PL %FI phi c c' B-2/06
27 19 21.0 40
W phi'LL PL %FI phi c c' E-03
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
SPILLWAY CHANNEL
CANTON LAKE
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
USCS Silt Siltstone Sandstone Shale
USCS Low Plasticity Clay
Baseline (feet)
LL= Liquid Limit
PL= Plastic Limit
%FI= Percent - 200 (%)
LEGEND
phi= Undrained Friction
Angle (degrees) c= Undrained Cohesion (psf) phi'=Drained Friction
Angle (degrees) c'= Drained Cohesion (psf)
W= Water Content (%)
T D
F E
N C
E
L A
B
R E
S U
L T
N T
O N
C
H A
N N
R
IN
G S .G
E
.G
CHANNEL SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION D-D
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION B-B
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTIONS
CL12EX-b103-sec-bcd b103.dgn
B103
B-B, C-C, AND D-D
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
FROM WATER LEVELS OBSERVED
DRILLING PROFILES MAY VARY
WATER LEVELS SHOWN IN
"DRAWING OF WORK AS-BUILT"
A
B
C
D
123456
D
C
B
REFERENCE
SHEET
INVITATION NO.
CONTRACT NO.SHEET OF
US Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District
Tulsa, Oklahoma
CONTRACT DATE:PLOT SCALE:
PLOT DATE:
DESIGN FILE:
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPR
DESIGNED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DRAWN BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED NORTH CANADIAN RIVER, OKLAHOMA
J WALDIE
W912-BV-14-R-0039
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DAM SAFETY PROD CTR
MARK A. LOCKE, P.E
1,580
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
1,670
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
1,670
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
29 18 10.8 93
WLL PL %FI
E-04
23 16 6.3 25
WLL PL %FI
E-05
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Sandstone
Clay Shale Siltstone
Baseline (feet)
LL= Liquid Limit
PL= Plastic Limit
%FI= Percent - 200 (%)
LEGEND
W= Water Content (%)
T D
F E
N C
E
L A
B
R E
S U
L T
N T
O N
C
H A
N N
R
IN
G S .G
E
.G
CHANNEL SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION F-F
1,550
1,560
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 1,550
1,560
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
3 8 6
18 35 50+/0.4
28 44 50+/0.3
01-10
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
5 11 13
3 4 6
27 50+/0.3
02-10
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
SW-2
SPTRQD(%)U.C.(psi)
LEGEND
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Baseline (feet)
SPT= Standard Penetration Test
(uncorrected blow counts)
RQD= Rock Quality Designation (%)
U.C.= Unconfined Compressive Strength (psi)
T D
F E
N C
E
S P
T
R
A N
T
R
U R
L L .G
SandstoneSilt Clay, Low Plasticity Silty Sand
Clay Shale (Mudstone) Silty Clayey SandSiltstone/ Silty Shale
CHANNEL SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION E-E
43.4
1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1,570
1,580
1,590
1,600
1,610
1,620
1,630
1,640
1,650
1,660
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
7 11 12
8 10 15
5 15 22
13 18 39
50/6"
D-Wall No. 6
SPTRQD(%)
1 2 3
2 3 3
2 4 4
2 4 4
2 2 3
1 2 1
2 3 3
4 7 9
2 3 8
7 9 14
35 50/5"
40 47 50/5"
30 42 50/5.5"
49 50/4"
D-Wall No. 8
SPTRQD(%) B-4/06
E-06
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Siltstone
Sandstone
Baseline (feet)
T D
F E
N C
E
S P
T
R
A N
T
R
U R
L L .G
30.1
43.7
31.4 phi'LL PL W %FI cphi c'
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
30 20 19.5 82
WLL PL %FI
LEGEND
SPT= Standard Penetration Test
(uncorrected blow counts)
RQD= Rock Quality Designation (%)
U.C.= Unconfined Compressive Strength (psi)
LL= Liquid Limit
PL= Plastic Limit
%FI= Percent - 200 (%) phi= Undrained Friction
Angle (degrees) c= Undrained Cohesion (psf) phi'=Drained Friction
Angle (degrees) c'= Drained Cohesion (psf)
W= Water Content (%)
Low Plasticity Silty Clay
Poorly-graded Sand
Sandy Silt Silty Sand
Silt
Silt Clay, Low Plasticity Silty Sand
Clay Shale
CHANNEL SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION G-G
B104 CL12EX-b104-sec-efg b104.dgn
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTIONS
E-E, F-F, G-G
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
FROM WATER LEVELS OBSERVED
DRILLING PROFILES MAY VARY
WATER LEVELS SHOWN IN
"DRAWING OF WORK AS-BUILT"
A
B
C
D
123456
D
C
B
REFERENCE
SHEET
INVITATION NO.
CONTRACT NO.SHEET OF
US Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District
Tulsa, Oklahoma
CONTRACT DATE:PLOT SCALE:
PLOT DATE:
DESIGN FILE:
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPR
DESIGNED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DRAWN BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED NORTH CANADIAN RIVER, OKLAHOMA
J WALDIE
W912-BV-14-R-0039
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DAM SAFETY PROD CTR
MARK A. LOCKE, P.E
1,480
1,500
1,520
1,540
1,560
1,580
1,600
1,620
1,640
1,660
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 1,480
1,500
1,520
1,540
1,560
1,580
1,600
1,620
1,640
1,660
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
S-01
S-02B S-03A
S-04A S-05
Baseline (feet)
E le v a ti o n f e e t)
Fill (made ground) Siltstone
Sandstone Shale Breccia
T D
F E
N C
N T
O N
C
H A
N N
R
IN
G S .G
E
.G
CHANNEL SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION H-H
USACE
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
TULSA DISTRICT
Silt Silty Sand
B105
H-H
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION
CL12EX-b105-sec-h_b105
BOTTOM
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
FROM WATER LEVELS OBSERVED
DRILLING PROFILES MAY VARY
WATER LEVELS SHOWN IN
SURFACE
GROUND
EXISTING
"DRAWING OF WORK AS-BUILT"
A
B
C
D
123456
D
C
B
REFERENCE
SHEET
INVITATION NO.
CONTRACT NO.SHEET OF
US Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District
Tulsa, Oklahoma
CONTRACT DATE:PLOT SCALE:
PLOT DATE:
DESIGN FILE:
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPR
DESIGNED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DRAWN BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED NORTH CANADIAN RIVER, OKLAHOMA
J WALDIE
W912-BV-14-R-0039
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DAM SAFETY PROD CTR
MARK A. LOCKE, P.E
+1650.4
+1648.9
+1647.4
+1646.9
+1645.5
+1641.9
+1641.5
1.5
3.0
4.5
5.0
6.4
10.0
10.4
SANDY SILT, RED-BROWN TO BROWN, DRY TO DAMP,
VERY STIFF
AUGERED WITHOUT SAMPLING
SANDY SILT, RED-BROWN, DRY TO DAMP, VERY
STIFF, WITH GRAY INCLUSIONS
AUGERED WITHOUT SAMPLING
SANDY SILT, BROWN, DRY TO DAMP, VERY STIFF,
WITH GRAY INCLUSIONS
AUGERED WITHOUT SAMPLING
SANDY SILT, RED-BROWN, DRY TO DAMP, VERY STIFF
SILTY SHALE, RED-BROWN WITH GRAY INCLUSIONS,
SILTY TO SANDY, HIGHLY TO SEVERELY
WEATHERED, WEAKLY CEMENTED, VERY SOFT
50+/0.4
50+/0.3
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
Jar 1
UD-1
Jar 2
Jar 3
Box 1 Pull 1 = 13 ft to 16.4 ft
Run = 3.4 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 3.4 ft
RQD = 0 %
1.5
3.0
4.5
5.0
6.4
10.0
10.4
Boring backfilled with a non-shrink grout
UD refused at 4.5 ft
Top of Rock at 10.4 ft
Set 6" casing at 13.0 ft
Begin Rock Coring at 13.0 ft
UNDISTURBED13. TOTAL NO. OF OVERBURDEN
SAMPLES TAKEN
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
N 393,929.2 E 1,789,513.2
+1651.9
DISTURBED
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
16. DATE HOLE
DEG. FROM VERT.
4. HOLE NO. (As shown on drawing title and file number)
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
11. DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (TBM or MSL)
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or Station)
SHEETS
3. DRILLING AGENCY
5. NAME OF DRILLER
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
12. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
OF
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
19. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
VERTICAL
01-10
INCLINED
DRILLING LOG
0.0
DIVISION
COMPLETED
1. PROJECT
STARTED
INSTALLATION SHEET
11/09/2010
10.4
Mark Martin
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
Southwest
CME-55 #2
+1651.9
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
8. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
6-inch Casing & PQ3 (3.27") Rock Core
25.9
11/09/2010
59.6
63.3
Tulsa District
NAVD 88 (US Survey feet)
BOX OR
SAMPLE
NO.
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Description)
DEPTH
a fc eb gd
ELEVATION
REMARKS
(Drilling time, water loss, depth weathering, etc., if significant)
Blow Counts or
Torvane
Measurements
(kg/sq cm)
LEGEND % Recovery
Hole No. 01-10
01-10
ENG FORM
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
PROJECT HOLE NO.
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.1836
MAR 71
SILTY SHALE, RED-BROWN WITH GRAY INCLUSIONS,
SILTY TO SANDY, HIGHLY TO SEVERELY
WEATHERED, WEAKLY CEMENTED, VERY SOFT
(continued)
HIGHLY WEATHERED AND ERODED ZONE FROM 19.1
TO 20.2
SOIL-LIKE FROM 23.8 TO 25.3
LOSS FROM 26.4 TO 41.4
90%
92%
0%
0%
0%
Box 1
Box 1 and Box
Box 2
Box 2
Box 2
Pull 2 = 16.4 ft to 21.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 4.5 ft
Loss = 0.5 ft
RQD = 58 %
Pull 3 = 21.4 ft to 26.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 4.6 ft
Loss = 0.4 ft
RQD = 65 %
Pull 4 = 26.4 ft to 31.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 5 ft
RQD = 0 %
Pull 5 = 31.4 ft to 33.9 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 2.5 ft
RQD = 0 %
(See next page for description)
Cored hard
4 SHEETS
PROJECT 2INSTALLATION
Tulsa District
DRILLING LOG (Cont Sheet)
ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
SHEET
OF
+1651.9
BOX OR
SAMPLE
NO.
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Description)
DEPTH
a fc eb gd
ELEVATION
REMARKS
(Drilling time, water loss, depth weathering, etc., if significant)
Blow Counts or
Torvane
Measurements
(kg/sq cm)
LEGEND % Recovery
Hole No. 01-10
01-10
ENG FORM
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
PROJECT HOLE NO.
1836-A
JUN 67
+1602.8 49.1
SILTY SHALE, RED-BROWN WITH GRAY INCLUSIONS,
SILTY TO SANDY, HIGHLY TO SEVERELY
WEATHERED, WEAKLY CEMENTED, VERY SOFT
(continued)
SOIL-LIKE FROM 48.5 TO 48.6
CLAY SHALE (MUDSTONE), RED-BROWN,
MODERATELY HARD
GYPSUM STRINGERS AT 51.0 AND 51.3
0%
0%
84%
88%
100%
100%
Box 2
Box 2
Box 2
Box 2 and Box
Box 3
Box 3 and Box
Pull 6 = 33.9 ft to 36.4 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 2.5 ft
RQD = 0 %
Pull 7 = 36.4 ft to 38.9 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 2.5 ft
RQD = 0 %
Pull 8 = 38.9 ft to 41.4 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 2.5 ft
RQD = 0 %
Pull 9 = 41.4 ft to 43.9 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 2.1 ft
Loss = 0.4 ft
RQD = 77 %
Pull 10 = 43.9 ft to 46.4 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 2.2 ft
Loss = 0.3 ft
RQD = 80 %
Pull 11 = 46.4 ft to 51.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 5 ft
Loss = 0 ft
RQD = 85 %
Pull 12 = 51.4 ft to 56.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 5 ft
Loss = 0 ft
RQD = 100 %
49.1
Return water very silty
Return water very silty
15 sec core time
4 SHEETS
PROJECT 3INSTALLATION
Tulsa District
DRILLING LOG (Cont Sheet)
ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
SHEET
OF
+1651.9
BOX OR
SAMPLE
NO.
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Description)
DEPTH
a fc eb gd
ELEVATION
REMARKS
(Drilling time, water loss, depth weathering, etc., if significant)
Blow Counts or
Torvane
Measurements
(kg/sq cm)
LEGEND % Recovery
Hole No. 01-10
01-10
ENG FORM
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
PROJECT HOLE NO.
1836-A
JUN 67
+1581.9 70.0
CLAY SHALE (MUDSTONE), RED-BROWN,
MODERATELY HARD (continued)
FRACTURED ZONES AT 56.8, 57.1 AND 57.5
VUGGY WITH HEALED FRACTURES FROM 59.0 TO 61.4
BOTTOM OF BORING
94%
82%
100%
Box 4 and Box
Box 5
Box 6
Pull 13 = 56.4 ft to 61.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 4.7 ft
Loss = 0.3 ft
RQD = 85 %
Pull 14 = 61.4 ft to 66.4 ft
Run = 5 ft
Recovery = 4.1 ft
Loss = 0.9 ft
RQD = 57 %
Pull 15 = 66.4 ft to 70 ft
Run = 3.6 ft
Recovery = 3.6 ft
Loss = 0 ft
RQD = 84 %
70.0
4 SHEETS
PROJECT 4INSTALLATION
Tulsa District
DRILLING LOG (Cont Sheet)
ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
SHEET
OF
+1651.9
BOX OR
SAMPLE
NO.
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Description)
DEPTH
a fc eb gd
ELEVATION
REMARKS
(Drilling time, water loss, depth weathering, etc., if significant)
Blow Counts or
Torvane
Measurements
(kg/sq cm)
LEGEND % Recovery
Hole No. 01-10
01-10
ENG FORM
Canton Dam North Wall Extension
PROJECT HOLE NO.
1836-A
JUN 67
PHOTO IN APPENDIX
PHOTO IN APPENDIX
PHOTO IN APPENDIX
PHOTO IN APPENDIX
Moist Unit Weight:130.9 pcf
Poissons Ratio: 0.46
Lateral Tangent Modulus: 0.03E6 psi
Young's Modulus, Axial Tangent Modulus: -0.01E6 psi
Unconfined Compressive Strength: 82 psi
Lab Sample: 65.1-66.7
PHOTO IN APPENDIX
CL12EX-b106-1-10 b106.dgn
BORING LOGS
1-10
B106
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
FROM WATER LEVELS OBSERVED
DRILLING PROFILES MAY VARY
WATER LEVELS SHOWN IN
"DRAWING OF WORK AS-BUILT"
A
B
C
D
123456
D
C
B
REFERENCE
SHEET
INVITATION NO.
CONTRACT NO.SHEET OF
US Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District
Tulsa, Oklahoma
CONTRACT DATE:PLOT SCALE:
PLOT DATE:
DESIGN FILE:
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPR
DESIGNED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DRAWN BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED NORTH CANADIAN RIVER, OKLAHOMA
J WALDIE
W912-BV-14-R-0039
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DAM SAFETY PROD CTR
MARK A. LOCKE, P.E
+1656.2
+1652.7
+1651.2
+1650.7
+1648.7
+1647.7
+1647.6
+1646.9
+1646.7
1.5
5.0
6.5
7.0
9.0
10.0
10.1
10.8
11.0
SANDY SILT, RED-BROWN, DRY, VERY STIFF
AUGERED WITHOUT SAMPLING
SANDY SILT, LIGHT BROWN, DAMP, VERY STIFF
AUGERED WITHOUT SAMPLING
SANDY SILT, RED-BROWN, DAMP, VERY STIFF
AUGERED WITHOUT SAMPLING
SANDY SILT, RED-BROWN, DAMP, VERY STIFF
SILTY SHALE, RED-BROWN, SILTY TO SANDY,
HIGHLY TO SEVERELY WEATHERED, WEAKLY
CEMENTED, VERY SOFT
SET CASING, DID NOT SAMPLE
SILTY SHALE, RED-BROWN, SILTY TO SANDY,
HIGHLY TO SEVERELY WEATHERED, WEAKLY
CEMENTED, VERY SOFT
50+/0.3
87%
100%
65%
100%
28%
0%
Jar 1
Jar 2
UD-1
Jar 3
Box 1
Box 1
Pull 1 = 11 ft to 13.5 ft
Run = 2.5 ft
Recovery = 0.7 ft
Loss = 1.8 ft
RQD = 20 %
Pull 2 = 13.5 ft to 16.1 ft
Run = 2.6 ft
Recovery = 0 ft
Loss = 2.6 ft
RQD = 0 %
1.5
5.0
6.5
7.0
9.0
10.0
1…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .