11B0023-Specs-AM17.PDF
PDF 395 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Modification of existing channel by excavating and reshaping the channel to increase channel capacity.
- Solicitation number
- W912BU-11-B-0023
About this file
Amendment 0017 - Specs
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 11B0023-SPECS-AM20.PDF | ||
| 11-B-23 _SF30 _Amend19.pdf | ||
| 11B0023-SPECS-AM18.PDF | ||
| 11B0023-DWGS-AM17.PDF | ||
| 11B0023-DWGS-AM16.PDF | ||
| 11B0023-SPECS-AM16.PDF | ||
| Amend15.pdf | ||
| Amend14.pdf | ||
| Amend13.pdf | ||
| amend12.pdf | ||
| Amend11.pdf | ||
| Amend10.pdf | ||
| Amend9.pdf | ||
| amend8.pdf | ||
| Amend7.pdf | ||
| Amend6.pdf | ||
| Amend5.p.pdf | ||
| amend4.1pdf.pdf | ||
| amend3.1.pdf | ||
| amend2.1.pdf | ||
| Amend1.pdf | ||
| LittleMillCreek_100 _Dwgs.pdf | ||
| LittleMillCreek_100 _Specs.pdf |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION
NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.
IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
Previous edition unusable
Channel Modification, Lower Reach, Little Mill Creek Flood Risk Management Project, New Castle County, Delaware
THIS AMENDMENT DOES NOT EXTEND THE BID OPENING DATE OF 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 AT 11:00 A.M. (EST)
Please indicate receipt of this amendment on Standard Form 1442 (SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD) as Amendment No. 0017 Failure to acknowledge all amendments may be cause for rejection of bid.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District Wanamaker Building, 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390
US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District Attn: Gregory Keaton Wanamaker Building, 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390
W912BU-11-B-0023
09/06/2013
09/27/2011
This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.
Amendment No. 0017
IFB W912BU-11-B-0023
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT (continued)
a. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS:
(1) Section 00 10 00 – BIDDING SCHEDULE: Please delete page 00 10 00-3 in its entirety and substitute revised page 00 10 00-3, annotated Amendment No.
0017, attached hereto.
(2) Section 00 73 15 – WAGE RATES: Please delete section 00 73 15 in its entirety and substitute revised section 00 73 15, annotated Amendment No.
(3) Please delete PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 in its entirety and substitute revised PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(4) Section 01 33 00 – SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES: Please delete pages 01 33 00-14 thru 01 33 00-20 in their entirety and substitute revised pages 01 33 00- 14 thru 01 33 00-22, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(5) Section 01 35 45 – CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY CONTROL: Please add new section
01 35 45, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(6) Section 01 45 00 – QUALITY CONTROL: Please delete section 01 45 00 in its entirety and substitute revised section 01 45 00, annotated Amendment No.
(7) Section 01 71 23 – SURVEY REQUIREMENTS: Please delete section 01 71 23 in its entirety and substitute revised section 01 71 23, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(8) Section 02 61 13 – HANDLING OF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL: Please delete section 02 61 13 in its entirety and substitute revised section 02 61 13, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(9) Section 31 37 00 – RIPRAP: Please delete section 31 37 00 in its entirety and substitute revised section 31 37 00, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(10) Section 33 30 00 - SANITARY SEWERS: Please add new section 33 30 00, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
(11) Section 33 30 05 - SANITARY AND STORM SEWER MODIFICATIONS: Please delete section 33 30 05 in its entirety.
(12) Section 33 40 00 – STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES: Please add new section 33 40
00, annotated Amendment No. 0017, attached hereto.
b. CONTRACT DRAWINGS: Please delete drawings GC-102, GC-403, GC-500, GC-501, C- 102, and C-104 in their entirety and substitute the revised drawings GC-102, GC- 403, GC-500, GC-501, C-102, and C-104, with the latest revision date of 4 September 2013, attached hereto.
c. Please indicate receipt of this amendment on Standard Form 1442 (SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD) as Amendment No. 0017. Failure to acknowledge all amendments may be cause for rejection of the bid.
IFB W912BU-13-B-0015
00 10 00-3
BIDDING SCHEDULE
(To be attached to SF 1442)
Item Estimated Unit Estimated No. Description Quantity Unit Price Amount
1. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control 1 JOB LS $
2. Water Diversion and Dewatering 1 JOB LS $
3. Material Disposal
a. Soils 1 12,902 CY $ $
b. Soils 2 17,544 CY $ $
c. Soils 3 924 CY $ $
d. Water 1 JOB LS $
e. Solids 1 1,200 CY $ $
f. Solids 2 900 CY $ $
g. Solids 3 400 CY $ $
h. Solids 4 200 CY $ $
4. Clearing and Grubbing 5.1 AC $ $
5. Structures Monitoring 1 JOB LS $
6. Excavation 31,400 CY $ $
7. Backfilling 1,200 CY $ $
8. Riprap 9,117 TON $ $
9. Imported Topsoil 140 CY $ $
10. Seed and Mulch 1 JOB LS $
11. Deleted
12. Erosion Control Mat 11,100 SY $ $
13. Tree and Shrub Plantings 1 JOB LS $
14. Disposal Haul Road 1 JOB LS $
15. Bioretention Basin Relocation 1 JOB LS $
16. Sanitary Sewer 1 JOB LS $
17. Storm Sewer 1 JOB LS $
18. Fencing 1 JOB LS $
TOTAL ESTIMATED BID AMOUNT $_________
NOTE: Bidders must bid on all items.
Section 01 73 15 Page 1
SECTION 00 73 15
WAGE RATES
Section 01 73 15 Page 2
General Decision Number: DE130009 08/30/2013 DE9
Superseded General Decision Number: DE20120009
State: Delaware
Construction Type: Heavy
County: New Castle County in Delaware.
Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/04/2013 1 05/31/2013 2 07/19/2013 3 08/09/2013 4 08/23/2013 5 08/30/2013
BRDE0001-003 05/01/2012
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 28.90 17.33
CARP0454-005 07/01/2012
Rates Fringes
PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 38.80 29.07
Footnote: PAID HOLIDAYS: Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day (provided the employee works the day before the holiday and the day after the holiday).
CARP0626-002 05/01/2013
Rates Fringes
Carpenter:
Carpenter...................$ 30.57 20.09 Scaffold Building...........$ 31.32 20.09
* CARP1906-007 07/01/2013
Rates Fringes
MILLWRIGHT.......................$ 34.30 28.98
ELEC0313-001 06/01/2013
Rates Fringes
ELECTRICIAN......................$ 36.44 69.33%
Section 01 73 15 Page 3
ENGI0542-006 05/01/2013
Rates Fringes
Operating Engineers:
Bulldozer and Forklift......$ 35.02 23.29+A
FOOTNOTE A: PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christams Day, and Election Day -- provided the employee works the scheduled work day before and after the holiday.
IRON0451-002 07/01/2012
Rates Fringes
Ironworkers:
Ornamental, Reinforcing, Rigger and Structural.......$ 33.60 25.40
LABO0199-004 05/01/2012
Rates Fringes
Laborers:
Brick Mason Tender..........$ 23.00 14.85 Common or General...........$ 22.80 13.30
PAIN0021-027 05/01/2013
Rates Fringes
Painter, Bridge..................$ 41.58 16.83
SUDE2007-005 08/16/2007
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 22.92 2.88
LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 17.43 4.51
OPERATOR: Backhoe...............$ 24.58 9.87
OPERATOR: Crane.................$ 23.83 12.13
OPERATOR: Excavator.............$ 24.99 3.85
OPERATOR: Loader................$ 21.83 7.30
OPERATOR: Roller................$ 18.94 3.25
TRUCK DRIVER: Dump Truck........$ 16.11 1.68
Section 01 73 15 Page 4
WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.
Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).
The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is union or non-union.
Union Identifiers
An identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" denotes that the union classification and rate have found to be prevailing for that classification. Example: PLUM0198-005 07/01/2011. The first four letters , PLUM, indicate the international union and the four-digit number, 0198, that follows indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable , i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination.
The date, 07/01/2011, following these characters is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate/collective bargaining agreement which would be July 1, 2011 in the above example.
Union prevailing wage rates will be updated to reflect any changes in the collective bargaining agreements governing the rates.
0000/9999: weighted union wage rates will be published annually each January.
Non-Union Identifiers
Classifications listed under an "SU" identifier were derived from survey data by computing average rates and are not union rates; however, the data used in computing these rates may include both union and non-union data. Example: SULA2004-007 5/13/2010. SU indicates the rates are not union majority rates, Section 01 73 15 Page 5
LA indicates the State of Louisiana; 2004 is the year of the survey; and 007 is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. A 1993 or later date, 5/13/2010, indicates the classifications and rates under that identifier were issued as a General Wage Determination on that date.
Survey wage rates will remain in effect and will not change until a new survey is conducted.
WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)
and 3.) should be followed.
With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:
Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.
Section 01 73 15 Page 6
3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:
Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.
END OF GENERAL DECISION
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK
01 32 01 PROJECT SCHEDULE
01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
01 35 45 CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY CONTROL
01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL
01 45 05 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)
01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
01 57 20 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
01 71 23 SURVEY REQUIREMENTS
01 76 00 STRUCTURES MONITORING
01 78 00 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
02 61 13 HANDLING OF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL
DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK
31 00 00 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILLING
31 05 19 GEOTEXTILE
31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
31 32 11 EROSION CONTROL MAT
31 32 39 BIORETENTION BASIN
31 37 00 RIPRAP
DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
32 15 00 DISPOSAL AREA HAUL ROADS
32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES
32 92 19 TOPSOIL, SEED AND MULCH
32 93 00 TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING
DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES
33 30 00 SANITARY SEWERS
33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1
S U
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
S D
-0
P re co ns tru ct io n
S ub m itt al s
FI
O
P ay ro ll
B as ic R ec or ds
S ta te m en ts o f C om pl ia nc e
FI
O A ffi rm at iv e A ct io n C om pl ia nc e P la n
FI
O
C er tif ic at e of In su ra nc e
S D
-0
P re co ns tru ct io n
S ub m itt al s
FI
O
E vi de nc e of
In su ra nc e
S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
C O
R P ro je ct S ch ed ul e
S D
-0
P re co ns tru ct io n
S ub m itt al s
1.
G C
O S ub m itt al
R eg is te r S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
C O
R U pd at e S ub m itt al
R eg is te r ( E
N G
Fo rm
8)
S
D -0
P re co ns tru ct io n S ub m itt al s G
D O
Q ua lif ic at io ns o f S af et y
P er so nn el 1.
G
A A cc id en t P re ve nt io n P la n
(A P
P
1.
G A
C on tra ct or A cc id en t P re ve nt io n P la n
(A P
P ) C he ck lis t
1.
G A
A ct iv ity
H az ar d
A na ly si s (A
H A
1.
6.
G A
C ra ne C rit ic al L ift P la n
1.
5.
1.
G A
C ra ne
O pe ra to rs S
D -0
Te st R ep or ts 1.
FI
O N ot ifi ca tio ns a nd R ep or tsSU B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
(r
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
1.
.2
FI
O A cc id en t R ep or ts 1.
.2
.1
FI
O O
S H
A
L og
FI
O M on th ly R ec or d of
W or k- R el at ed In ju rie s/ Ill ne ss es
E xp os ur e 1.
.3
FI
O
C ra ne R ep or ts S
D -0
C er tif ic at es
FI
O C on fin ed S pa ce
E nt ry P er m it
FI
O H ot w or k pe rm it
FI
O Li ce ns e C er tif ic at es
S
D -0
P ro du ct D at a
3.
G D
O S am pl in g an d
A na ly si s P la n
S D
-0
Te st
R ep or ts
1.
6.
FI
O Q
A S am pl e C ol le ct io n an d A na ly si s
3.
FI
O
C he m is try D at a
P ac ka ge
3.
G C he m ic al
D at a Fi na l R ep or t
S
D -0
P re co ns tru ct io n S ub m itt al s G
D O
Q ua lif ic at io ns o f Q ua lit y
C on tro l
P er so nn el G
C O
R Q ua lit y C on tro l P la n S
D -0
Te st R ep or ts
FI
O D ai ly
C Q
C R ep or t
S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
C O
R Te m po ra ry
F ac ilit ie s P la n
S D
-0
P re co ns tru ct io n
S ub m itt al s
G C
O R
Lo ca tio n of S to ra ge F ac ili tie s
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
G D
O W at er
D iv er si on a nd D ew at er in g W or k
P la n S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
C O
R E nv iro nm en ta l P ro te ct io n P la n
G D
O S oi l E ro si on a nd S ed im en t
C on tro l I te m s G
D O
S oi l E ro si on a nd
S ed im en t C on tro l G
C O
R D is po sa l F ac ilit ie s
S D
-0
P re co ns tru ct io n
S ub m itt al s
G D
O Q ua lif ic at io ns
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
G D
O S ur ve yi ng
P ro ce du re s an d
E qu ip m en t
G D
O B ef or e an d A fte r S ur ve ys G
D O
M et ad at a
S
D -0
P re co ns tru ct io n S ub m itt al s G
D O
Q ua lif ic at io ns G
D O
Le tte r t o
O w ne rs
G D
O S tru ct ur e
M on ito rin g P la n
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
G D
O M on ito rin g
R ep or t
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
G C
O R
P ro gr es s P rin ts
S D
-1
C lo se ou t S ub m itt al s
G C
O R
A s-
B ui lt D ra w in gs
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
S D
-0
S ho p D ra w in gs
3.
G D
O S ur ve ys S
D -0
P ro du ct D at a
1.
G D
O W or k
P la n 3.
G
D O
C lo su re
R ep or t
2.
FI
O
Fi el d S cr ee ni ng
T es t S
D -0
Te st R ep or ts 3.
G
D O
S ur ve ys
G D
O C on fir m at io n
S am pl in g an d A na ly si s
3.
.1 G
D O
S am pl in g of
S to re d
M at er ia l 3.
.2
G D
O S am pl in g
Li qu id 1.
G
D O
P ro te ct io n
P la n 1.
G
D O
P C
B C on ta m in at ed
S oi l R em ov al
P la n 1.
G
D O
P C
B C on ta m in at ed
W at er H an dl in g
P la n 1.
G
D O
S am pl in g an d Te st in g P la n
G D
O C on fir m at or y
G rid
S am pl in g P la n
1.
FI
O
Tr ai ni ng c er tif ic at io n 1.
G
D O
C
IH
q ua lif ic at io ns 1.
G
D O
P C
B D is po sa l P la n
3.
.1
FI
O S hi pp in g do cu m en ta tio n
FI
O V eh ic le d ec on ta m in at io n ve rif ic at io n
3.
FI
O
B or ro w s ite te st in g
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
3.
.3 .1
FI
O
C er tif ic at e of D is po sa l
S D
-1
C lo se ou t S ub m itt al s
1.
G D
O C lo se ou t R ep or t
S
D -0
P re co ns tru ct io n S ub m itt al s G
D O
S ite
D em ol iti on P la n
G D
O E ar th w or k W or k
P la n G
D O
A ct iv at ed C ar bo n W or k
P la n S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
D O
Fi el d Te st in g C on tro l S
D -0
Te st R ep or ts G
D O
Fi el d M oi st ur e/
D en si ty
T es ts G
D O
Te st in g of S at is fa ct or y
B ac kf ill
M at er ia ls
S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
D O
G eo te xt ile S
D -0
S am pl es G
D O
G eo te xt ile
S
D -1
C lo se ou t S ub m itt al s G
C O
R S hi pp in g
P ap er s
S D
-0
P ro du ct
D at a G
D O
M an uf ac tu re r's C at al og D at a
S D
-0
S am pl es
G D
O E ro si on C on tro l M at
S D
-0
Te st
R ep or ts
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
G D
O H ig h
V el oc ity
F lo w T es ts
U nd er B ar e
S oi l a nd
V eg et at ed C on di tio ns
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
G D
O W or k
P la n G
D O
E ro si on
C on tro l M at
S
D -0
P ro du ct D at a
G D
O S ou rc es fo r R ip ra p
G D
O G ra da tio n
C ur ve s
G D
O W or k
P la n S
D -0
C er tif ic at es
FI
O C er tif ie d
W ei gh t S ca le
T ic ke ts
S D
-0
P ro du ct
D at a 1.
G
D O
P la nt , E qu ip m en t, an d To ol s
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
G D
O W or kp la n
G D
O A gg re ga te
FI
O
W ay bi lls a nd
D el iv er y Ti ck et s S
D -0
Te st R ep or ts G
D O
S am pl in g an d Te st in g 1.
5.
2.
G
D O
Fi el d D en si ty T es ts
S D
-0
S am pl es
G D
O A gg re ga te
S D
-0
S ho p D ra w in gs
1.
G D
O Fe nc e
A ss em bl y S
D -0
P ro du ct D at a
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
1.
G D
O Fe nc e
A ss em bl y 2.
G
Zi nc
C oa tin g
2.
G Fa br ic
G D
O C ha in
L in k Fe nc e
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
1.
5.
G
D O
C er tif ic at es o f C om pl ia nc e
S
D -0
Te st R ep or ts G
C O
R Te st R ep or ts S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
C O
R Fe rti liz er G
C O
R To ps oi l G
C O
R Te m po ra ry a nd
P er m an en t
S ee di ng
P la n G
C O
R Te m po ra ry a nd
P er m an en t S ee d
M ix tu re s G
C O
R M ai nt en an ce R ep or t
S
D -0
C er tif ic at es G
C O
R P la nt
M at er ia l G
C O
R O rg an ic M at er ia l
2.
G C
O R
M yc or rh iz al
F un gi In oc ul um 3.
G
C O
R P la nt
E st ab lis hm en t P er io d
3.
8.
2.
G C
O R
M ai nt en an ce
R ec or d
S D
-1
O pe ra tio n an d M ai nt en an ce D at a
3.
8.
G
C O
R M ai nt en an ce In st ru ct io ns
S
D -0
P re co ns tru ct io n S ub m itt al s
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
1.
FI
O
E xi st in g C on di tio ns
1.
4.
G
C O
B yp as s
P um pi ng
P la n S
D -0
S ho p
D ra w in gs 1.
4.
FI
O
D ra w in gs 2.
3.
FI
O
P re ca st c on cr et e m an ho le 2.
3.
FI
O
M et al it em s
2.
3.
4.
FI
O
Fr am es , c ov er s, a nd g ra tin gs S
D -0
P ro du ct D at a
2.
FI
O
P ip el in e m at er ia ls
S D
-0
Te st
R ep or ts
2.
FI
O
R ep or ts
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
2.
2.
FI
O P or tla nd C em en t
FI
O G as ke ts
FI
O P ol ye th yl en e
P ip e
S
D -0
P ro du ct D at a
3.
FI
O
P la ci ng
P ip e S
D -0
S am pl es 2.
FI
O P ip e fo r C ul ve rts a nd S to rm
D ra in s
S D
-0
C er tif ic at es
FI
O
R es in C er tif ic at io n
3.
FI
O
P ip el in e Te st in g
FI
O H yd ro st at ic T es t o n W at er tig ht
Jo in ts 3.
6.
FI
O
D et er m in at io n of D en si ty
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
B M
IT
TA
L
FO
R M
,J an
P R
E V
IO
U
S E
D
IT
IO
N
IS
O
B S
O
LE
TE
P
A G
E
O F
P
A G
E S
Li ttl e M ill C re ek
C ha nn el
M od ifi ca tio n, F Y
/1
FI
O
Fr am e an d C ov er fo r G ra tin gs
SU
B
M
IT
TA
L
R
EG
IS
TE
R C
O N
TR
A
C T
N O
TI
TL
E A
N D
L O
C A
TI
O
N C
O N
TR
A
C
TO
R
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
S
C H
E D
U
LE
D A
TE
S
C O
N
TR
A C
TO
R
A C
TI
O
N A
P P
R O
V
IN
G A
U
TH
O R
IT
Y
A C T I V I T Y N O
T R A N S M I T T A L N O
S P E C S E C T
D E
S C
R
IP
TI
O
N
IT
E
M S
U B
M
IT
TE
D
P A R A G R A P H
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
G O V T O R A / E R E V W R S
U B
M
IT
A P
P R
O V
A L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
M A
TE
R
IA
L
N E
E D
E D
B Y
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
A
P P
R A
U
TH
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M C
O N
TR
D A
TE
F
W D
TO
O
TH
E
R R
E V
IE
W
E R
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
O
M O
TH
R
E V
IE
W
E R
A C T I O N C O D E
D A
TE
O
F A
C
TI
O N
M A
IL
E
D
TO
C O
N
TR
D A
TE
R
C D
FR
M
A P
P R
A U
TH
R
E M
A R
K S
(a
(b
(c
(d
(e
(f) (g
(h
(i)
(j) (k
(l)
(m
(n
(o
(p
(q
SECTION 01 35 45
CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY CONTROL
PART 1 GENERAL
1.1 REFERENCES
The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)
EM 200-1-1 (1994) Environmental Quality -- Validation of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories
EM 200-1-3 (2001) Engineering and Design -- Requirements for the Preparation of Sampling and Analysis Plans
EM 200-1-6 (1997) Environmental Quality -- Chemical Quality Assurance for HTRW Projects
ER 1110-1-263 (1998) Engineering and Design -- Chemical Data Quality Management for Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste Remedial Activities
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
EPA SW-846.3-3 (1999, Third Edition, Update III-A) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste:
Physical/Chemical Methods
U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NARA)
40 CFR 261 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
40 CFR 262 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
40 CFR 268 Land Disposal Restrictions
49 CFR 172 Hazardous Materials Table, Special Provisions, Hazardous Materials Communications, Emergency Response Information, and Training Requirements
49 CFR 178 Specifications for Packagings
1.2 ACRONYMS
The definition of acronyms used by the Contractor that pertain to chemical data quality control shall be clearly defined for all contract related products and communications.
Section 01 35 45 Page 1
1.3 CHEMISTRY REQUIREMENTS
Chemical Data Quality Control (CDQC) shall be as defined in ER 1110-1-263;
this ER, which integrates USACE guidance on the subject, shall be supplemented by EM 200-1-6 for detail technical guidance on CDQC. Tables and charts defining Design Analysis (DA), ROD, and remedial technology specific chemistry shall be according to or consistent with EM 200-1-3.
1.3.1 Data Quality Objectives (DQO)
For field screening of waste sediment, construction generated waste water, and waste characterization sampling, sample acquisition, chemical analysis and chemical parameter measurements shall be performed so that the resulting data meet and support data use requirements. The chemical data shall be acquired, documented, verified and reported to ensure that the specified precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, completeness and sensitivity requirements are achieved.
1.3.2 Sampling, Analysis and Measurement
Field screening of waste soil/sediment shall be performed for total polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) using immuno assay kits. Waste that will be delivered to a regulated disposal facility shall be sampled and analyzed for disposal facility requirements. Proper waste manifest rescords shall be created.
1.3.2.1 Soil Samples
Soil samples shall be collected in accordance to the Sampling and Analysis Planand analyzed for full range PAHs and PCBs by an accredited laboratory according to the requirements of Section 02 61 13 HANDLING OF CONTAMINATED
MATERIAL.
1.3.2.2 Process Liquid Samples
Process liquid samples shall be collected in accordance to the Sampling and Analysis Plan and analyzed with a method detection limit of less than 1 ppb total PCBs by an accredited laboratory according to the requirements of Section 02 61 13 HANDLING OF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL.
1.3.2.3 Manifesting Samples
Material shipping manifesting shall be in accordance with 40 CFR 261, 40 CFR 262, 40 CFR 268, 49 CFR 172, and 49 CFR 178. Manifesting samples shall be collected and analyzed according to the approved waste handling facility requirements.
1.3.2.4 Field Screening
Field screening shall include photoionization detector, immuno assay field kits or similar methods according to the COR.
1.4 SUBMITTALS
Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation;
submittals not having a "G" designation are for information only. When used, a designation following the "G" designation identifies the office that will review the submittal for the Government. The following shall be
Section 01 35 45 Page 2 submitted in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:
SD-03 Product Data
Sampling and Analysis Plan; G, DO
Submit no later than 10 days after receipt of notice to proceed.
SD-06 Test Reports
QA Sample Collection and Analysis Chemistry Data Package
Chemical Data Final Report; G, Each report shall be labeled with the contract number, project name and location.
1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE ELEMENTS
For samples to be submitted to a laboratory, follow the QA elements necessary to monitor and ensure the quality of chemical data produced.
1.5.1 Laboratory Validation Requirements
Propose the minimum number of laboratories that can attain or have attained U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) validation in accordance with EM 200-1-1 and consistent with contract required chemical data quality.
The Contractor may propose laboratories that shall subsequently be validated by the USACE, or select currently validated USACE laboratories.
Identify all proposed project laboratories in the sampling and analysis plan (SAP). If a proposed analytical laboratory cannot meet specified analytical requirements or achieve the required validation, select another laboratory. If not currently validated, the USACE laboratory validation process requires a nominal 120 day process.
1.5.2 QA Sample Collection and Analysis
Collect and transport QA samples to the QA laboratory. Samples for all analyses (except volatiles) shall be taken as splits of homogenized samples. Samples for volatiles shall be collected as discrete duplicates/triplicates. Samples shall be collected at a rate of 10 percent per matrix per analysis per sampling event.
a. Submit the QA Laboratory Advance Notification (QALAN) to the QA laboratory at least 10 business days before the initial shipment of samples. The QALAN shall include a list of laboratory-related DQO.
The DQO shall include, but shall not be limited to, identification of extraction and analysis method numbers, a list of analytes with required limits, estimated number of tests, approximate sampling dates, and requested completion date for QA testing. Notify the Contracting Officer (CO) and the QA laboratory immediately of any changes.
b. Provide all labor and field supplies, including sample containers and shipping coolers, for collecting and shipping samples for QA testing.
In the presence of the Contracting Officer, properly collect, label, and package the QA samples, fill out all chain-of-custody forms, and ship the samples by one-day delivery service to the designated QA laboratory for analysis. Notify the laboratory when all sampling is
Section 01 35 45 Page 3 completed and shall clearly mark the chain-of-custody form accompanying the final shipment "FINAL" in 1 inch high lettering.
c. Allow 30 days for laboratory analysis of QA samples, data review, and submission of the Government chemical quality assurance report. The elapsed time shall begin when the Contractor's last sample arrives at the QA laboratory, provided that the Contractor's completed chemistry data package is received within 30 calendar days thereafter.
Otherwise, allow 30 calendar days from the date the completed chemistry data package is received at the laboratory. The Contractor may, as an option, continue activities based on initial sampling and QC results, before receipt of QA test results. Where QA results are unacceptable due to Contractor negligence (e.g. improper sample collection and/or handling by the Contractor), or where QA sample results conflict with the Contractor's primary sample results, further sampling and testing shall be performed as directed by the CO. All costs for such additional sampling and testing due to Contractor negligence, including both QC and QA testing and analysis, and for any required remedial actions in the work, shall be borne by the Contractor. USACE acceptance of final disposition of any excavated soil shall not occur until the Contractor's sampling and QC results have been confirmed by QA results. This includes all final stockpiling, wasting, backfilling, and related construction. No payment will be made for laboratory sampling and testing before receipt and acceptance by the Government of the QA samples and the completed Chemical Data Final Report (CDFR), properly formulated according to these specifications.
1.6 QUALIFICATIONS
1.6.1 Chemical Quality Control Officer
As a minimum, the Contractor's Chemical Quality Control Officer shall have: a 4-year degree; 10 years of experience related to investigations, studies, design and remedial actions at HTRW sites; and one continuous calendar year experience in calibration and operation of various field monitoring devices as well as standard analytical chemistry methods common for analyzing soil, water, air and other materials for chemical contamination assessment, including hazardous waste manifesting. The Chemical Quality Control Officer shall ensure that all chemistry related objectives including responsibilities for DQO definitions, sampling and analysis, project requirements for data documentation and validation, and final project reports are attained. The Chemical Quality Control officer need not be present onsite during routine sampling, but shall be available for consultation with Government and Contractor personnel.
1.6.2 Project Chemist
As a minimum, the Contractor's Senior Chemist shall have: a 4-year degree;
10 years of experience related to investigations, studies, design and remedial actions at HTRW sites; one field season experience in calibrating and operating various field monitoring devices; and 1 year of experience in the operation of an HTRW commercial laboratory with standard analytical chemistry methods common for analyzing soil, water, air and other materials for chemical contamination assessment, including data for hazardous waste manifesting. The project chemist shall ensure that all chemistry related goals of the program are attained. The project chemist shall be onsite during all sampling events and shall also be available for consultation with Government personnel.
Section 01 35 45 Page 4
1.6.3 Environmental Sampler
As a minimum, the Contractor's Environmental Sampler shall have: a 4-year degree in Chemistry, Environmental Science, Engineering, Geology, Hydrology, or a related field; 5 years of experience in the development and preparation of SAP and work plans; 5 years of experience in and knowledge of EPA methods for collecting environmental and hazardous waste samples; 2 years of experience in operation of field screening equipment (e.g. PID, FID, infrared spectrometer, immunoassay, etc.); and 2 field seasons of experience with the particular field screening techniques for use on this project. The Environmental Sampler shall collect all onsite samples and perform all field screening tests. The Environmental Sampler shall review the sampling results, and provide recommendations for the Contractor's sampling program. The Environmental Sampler shall be onsite during excavation and stockpiling operations involving contaminated soil or soil to be checked for contamination.
1.7 COORDINATION MEETING
After the preconstruction conference, before any sampling or testing, the Contractor and the Contracting Officer will meet at the construction site job trailer to discuss the CQC Plan and the SAP. The coordination meeting will be simultaneous to any CQC coordination meeting required in Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL unless otherwise indicated or directed. A list of definable features that involve chemical measurements shall be agreed upon. At a minimum, each matrix (soil, water, air, containerized wastes, radioactive wastes, instrumental chemical parameter measurement, etc.)
shall be a definable work feature. Management of the chemical data quality system including project DQO, project submittals, chemical data documentation, chemical data assessment, required sampling and analysis protocols, and minimum data reporting requirements shall be agreed upon.
The meeting will serve to establish an interrelationship between the Contractor's chemical data quality management and Government chemical quality assurance requirements. Minutes of the meeting will be documented by the Government and shall be signed by both the Contractor and the Contracting Officer. The minutes will include any or all unresolved chemical issues along with the conditions for resolution and will become a part of the contract file.
PART 2 PRODUCTS
Not Used
PART 3 EXECUTION
3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Provide chemical sample acquisition, sample analysis, instrumental measurements of chemical parameters for chemical data quality control. An effective chemical data quality control system shall be established that meets the requirements for the chemical measurement DQO applicable to the project. The system shall cover chemical measurements pertaining to and required for Contractor and subcontractor produced chemical data. Control field screening, sampling, and testing in conjunction with excavation activities to meet all DQO; minimize the amount of excavated material requiring temporary storage; prevent dilution of contaminated soils with clean soils; and ensure completion of work within the required time.
Section 01 35 45 Page 5
3.2 QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
3.2.1 Additional Requirements
In addition to the quality control requirements specified in Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL, the CQC Plan shall incorporate the qualifications, authority and responsibilities of all chemical quality management and support personnel. Chemical measurements including sampling and/or chemical parameter measurement will not be permitted to begin until after production and acceptance of the CQC Plan, and Government approval of the SAP.
3.2.2 Chemistry Elements of the CQC Plan
To cover contract related chemical measurements by the Contractor and all subContractors, the CQC Plan shall include the following as a minimum.
3.2.2.1 Qualifications
Names, education, experience qualifications, authorities, and decision-making responsibilities of all chemical quality management and support personnel. The CQC Plan shall contain a copy of a letter from the project QC manager designating and authorizing a Chemical Quality Control Officer and chemical quality control organization staff.
3.2.2.2 Authority and Responsibility
A diagram, flow chart, or figure clearly depicting the chemical data quality management and support staff and the authority and responsibility of each for chemical sampling and analysis, procedures for corrective actions, deliverables and submittals, deviations and changes, chemical quality documentation, data validation, minimum data reporting requirements, and DQO for chemical parameter measurement by the Contractor and subContractors. The contents of this section of the CQC Plan shall be included in the applicable "Project Organization" elements of the FSP and the QAPP.
3.3 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
The SAP shall be prepared in accordance with CDQC requirements and EM 200-1-3. The SAP shall be a two-part document that contains two distinct elements: FSP and QAPP. Sections of the FSP and QAPP shall be cross referenced. The SAP shall confirm the Contractor's understanding of the contract requirements for chemical data quality control, and shall describe procedures for field sampling and sample submittal for analysis, field chemical parameter measurement, data documentation, data assessment and data reporting requirements. The SAP shall delineate the methods the Contractor intends to use to accomplish the chemical quality control items to assure accurate, precise, representative, complete, legally defensible and comparable data. The SAP shall describe all chemical parameter measurements for all matrices for all phases of the remediation contract.
As a single interrelated document, the SAP shall be provided to field and laboratory personnel. The Contractor may propose original/innovative approaches to chemical parameter measurements for cost reduction and remediation efficiency by abbreviated sampling, contingency sampling and/or contingency analysis, indicator or tracer analysis, onsite analytical services, equivalency or screening methods. The SAP shall clearly identify the Contractor obtained laboratories. Furnish copies of the Government approved SAP to all laboratories and the Contractor's field sampling crew.
Section 01 35 45 Page 6
The SAP shall address all levels of the investigation with enough detail to become a document which may be used as an audit guide for field and laboratory work.
3.3.1 Quality Assurance Project Plan
This QAPP shall be included as a section within the SAP and contain necessary technical detail and direction for field and laboratory personnel to understand project sample analysis, quality control and data reporting requirements, analytical methods, required detection limits, QC requirements, and data validation and reporting requirements.
3.4 CHEMISTRY DATA PACKAGE
The chemistry data package shall be produced and provided to the COR after the staging area pre-sample and post-sample results are retained.
The chemistry data package shall contain information to demonstrate that the project's DQO have been fulfilled. The QA function will compare QA sample results to corresponding primary sample results, will assess the Contractor's compliance with the SAP, and will recommend corrective action as necessary.
3.5 CONTROL OF CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY
Contractor chemical data quality control shall ensure that a quality control program is in place that assures sampling and analytical activities and the resulting chemical parameter measurement data comply with the DQO and the requirements of the SAP. Utilize the three-phase control system that includes a preparatory, initial and follow-up phase for each definable feature of work. The Contractor's three-phase chemical data control process shall ensure that data reporting requirements are achieved and shall be implemented according to Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL. The three-phase chemical data control process shall be combined with that under Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL.
3.6 ANALYTICAL TESTING LABORATORIES
Propose the analytical laboratories to be used for the primary samples analyses. Laboratory validation requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph Laboratory Validation Requirements. The Contractor may utilize its own laboratory or utilize subcontract laboratories to achieve the primary required sample analyses.
3.6.1 Laboratory Analytical Requirements
Provide the specified chemical analyses by the Contractor's laboratory.
Provide chemical analyses to achieve the project DQO for all parameters specified by the methods. To give the USACE programs the greatest flexibility in the execution of its projects, the EPA SW-846.3-3 methods are generally the methods employed for the analytical testing of environmental samples. These methods are flexible and shall be adapted to individual project-specific requirements.
3.6.2 Laboratory Performance
Provide continued acceptable analytical performance and shall establish a procedure to address data deficiencies noted by review and/or quality assurance sample results. Provide and implement a mechanism for providing
Section 01 35 45 Page 7 analytical labs with the SAP or QAPP portion of the SAP, for monitoring the lab's performance and for performing corrective action procedures. Acquire analytical services with additional State of Delaware validated laboratories in the event a project lab loses its validation status during the project.
3.7 CHEMICAL DATA FINAL REPORT
The CDFR shall be produced including a summary of quality control practices employed and all chemical parameter measurement activities after project completion. As a minimum, the CDFR shall contain the following:
a. Summary of project scope and description.
b. Summary of any deviations from the design chemical parameter measurement specifications.
c. Summary of chemical parameter measurements performed as contingent measurements.
d. Summary discussion of resulting data including achieving data reporting requirements.
e. Summary of achieving project specific DQO.
f. Presentation and evaluation of the data to include an overall assessment on the quality of the data for each method and matrix.
g. Internal QC data generated during the project, including tabular summaries correlating sample identifiers with all blank, matrix spikes, surrogates, duplicates, laboratory control samples, and batch identifiers.
h. A list of the affected sample results for each analyte (indexed by method and matrix) including the appropriate data qualifier flag (J, B, R, etc.), where sample results are negatively impacted by adverse quality control criteria.
i. Summary of field and laboratory oversight activities, providing a discussion of the reliability of the data, QC problems encountered, and a summary of the evaluation of data quality for each analysis and matrix as indicated by the laboratory QC data and any other relevant findings.
j. Conclusions and recommendations.
k. Appendices containing: (1) Chemistry data package, and (2) Results of the Chemical Quality Assurance Report (CQAR). The CQAR is a Government produced document achieved through the inspection and analysis of QA samples and corresponding project sample data. The CQAR will include review of all QC parameters such as holding times, detection limits, method blanks, surrogate recoveries, matrix spikes and duplicates, and inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory data comparisons.
3.8 DOCUMENTATION
Documentation records shall be provided as factual evidence that required chemical data has been produced and chemical data quality has been achieved. The documentation shall comply with the requirements specified
Section 01 35 45 Page 8 in paragraphs SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN, CHEMISTRY DATA PACKAGE, and
CHEMICAL DATA FINAL REPORT.
3.9 NOTIFICATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE
The Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor of any detected noncompliance with the foregoing requirements. Take immediate corrective action after receipt of such notice.
3.10 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
No separate measurement or payment will be made for the work specified in this section and all costs in connection therewith shall be included in the costs of all the bid items.
-- End of Section --
Section 01 35 45 Page 9
SECTION 01 45 00
QUALITY CONTROL
PART 1 GENERAL
1.1 REFERENCES
The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.
ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)
ASTM D3740 (2012a) Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in Engineering Design and Construction
ASTM E329 (2011c) Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Materials Used in Construction
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC)
ICC…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .