Amendment_0002_-_W9128F-18-R-0048.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0002 W9128F

INDOOR FIRING RANGE, MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA

See attached documentation for content of the changes to RFP

Date for receipt of proposals is 11 MAR 2019 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Lauren Levy, Contract Specialist (402) 995-2049

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

1616 CAPITOL AVE.

OMAHA, NE 68102-4901

See Item 6

W9128F-18-R-0048

02/27/2019

01/25/2019

02/27/2019

Am #0002 - 2 (Continuation of SF30)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Omaha District, Corps of Engineers

1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

:NOTICE: Failure to acknowledge : Solicitation No. W9128F-18-R-0048 :all amendments may cause rejec-:

:tion of the offer. See FAR : Date of Issue: 25 JAN 2019 :52.215-1 of Section 00 21 00. : NEW Date of Receiving Proposals:

11 MAR 2019

Amendment No. 0002

27 FEB 2019

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0002 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Design and Construction of Indoor Firing Range at Minot AFB, ND

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages as noted below. The substituted pages are revised and reissued with this amendment. For convenience, in sections marked with asterisks, changes have been identified with underlined (additions) and strikethrough (deletions) text. All portions of reissued specification pages shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated in this manner.

Pages Deleted Pages Substituted or Added 00 10 00 00 10 00* 00 22 00 00 22 00 01 82 00 01 82 00* 01 83 00 01 83 00* 01 86 10 01 86 10* 01 86 26 01 86 26*

b. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawing(s) are revised with a revision date as indicated in the title block, and reissued with this amendment.

(1) Sheet MID3CS103A, BID OPTION SITE PLAN AREA 103A

(2) Sheet MID3CS103B, BID OPTION SITE PLAN AREA 103B

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged on the new Standard Form 1442. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged.

3. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m, local time at place of receiving proposals, 11 MAR 2019.

Attachments:

Specification pages listed in 1.a. above Drawings listed in 1.b. above

Am #0002 - 3 (Continuation of SF30)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

27 FEB 2019

jlb/2099

00 10 00 Page 1

SOLICITATION, OFFER

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

W9128F-18-R-0048

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED

25 JAN 2019

PAGES OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.

6. PROJECT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE CT 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Contracting Division (CENWO-CT) 1616 Capitol Ave

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT) 1616 Capitol Ave

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME

Lauren Levy

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

(402) 995-2049

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):

The offeror hereby agrees to do all work described in the documents entitled:

INDOOR FIRING RANGE

MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA

RETURN WITH OFFER: INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 00 10 00 (SF1442), SECTION 00 22 00, AND SECTION 00 45 00.

*BLOCK 13A. – REFER TO SECTION 00 22 00 FOR THE NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL OFFER.

THIS SOLICITATION IS UNRESTRICTED AND IS OPEN TO BOTH LARGE AND SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPITATION.

This solicitation contains additional security requirements that were not in effect prior to 2014. Please reference Section 01 30 00.24, Paragraph 1.4.

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within 10 calendar days and complete it within 600* calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable.

*NOTE: Please see Section 00 22 00 for additional information regarding the period of performance.

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES NO

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and * copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by 1400 (hour) local time 4 11 MAR 2019. If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than 30 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442(REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

Am_0002

00 10 00 Page 2

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

DUNS or Unique Entity Identifier Number:

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within 30 calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

SEE ATTACHED CLIN PRICING SCHEDULE

Contractor’s Fax No. CAGE CODE Contractor’s E-Mail address

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER

(Type or print)

20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha 1616 Capitol Ave.

Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

USAED Omaha c/o USACE Finance Center 5722 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work, requisitions identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award,

(b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED

TO SIGN (Type or print)

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE 31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31C. AWARD DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

00 10 00 - 3

CONTRACT LINE ITEM PRICING SCHEDULE

ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT

BASIC ITEMS

Entire work complete to Design an Indoor Firing Range and Site Work, including items 0004 – 001009 (also referred to as Options 1 – 76) listed below.

Job

Construct an Indoor Firing Range, up to 5 feet outside of the building, excluding Option items listed below.

Construct Sitework, complete from the five-foot line to the limits of construction of the Indoor Small Arms Firing Range, excluding Option items listed below.

TOTAL BASIC AMOUNT $_____________________________

OPTION ITEMS

[Option 1]

Additional cost to Construct Option Area of Indoor Firing Range as shown on the Plans.

[Option 2]

Option Site Work as shown on the Plans Sheet CS103A.

[Option 3]

Option Site Work as shown on Sheet CS103B.

00076 [Option 34]

Additional cost to Procure and Install Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment in accordance with the Plans and Specifications.

00 10 00 - 4

00087 [Option 45] and Install Water Lines and Appurtenances as shown on the Plans.

00098 [Option 56] and Install Sanitary Sewer Lines as shown on the Plans.

00090010 [Option 67] and Install Gas Lines as shown on the Plans.

TOTAL AMOUNT (BASIC PLUS OPTIONS) $_________________________________

NOTES:

1. See SECTION 00 21 01, INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, & NOTICES TO BIDDERS for evaluation of options. The Government reserves the right to exercise the options within 365 days after issuance of Notice to Proceed.

2. Prices must be entered for all items of the schedule. Total amounts submitted without prices being entered on individual items will be rejected. Additions will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the Job (lump-sum) prices and the total amount, the lump-sum prices will be considered the price submitted.

3. A modification to a proposal which provides for a single adjustment to the total amount submitted, should state the application of the adjustment to each respective lump-sum price affected. If the modification is not so apportioned, the single adjustment will be applied to Item No. 0001.

4. CLIN 0006 (Option 3) will only be awarded if CLIN 0005 (Option 2) is also awarded.

Section 00 22 00 W9128F-18-R-0048

Section 00 22 00 Page 1

SECTION 00 22 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF

AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

5.0 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

5.1. FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.2. FACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.3. FACTOR 3 – KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.4. FACTOR 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.5. FACTOR 5 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

6.0 PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

6.1. GENERAL

6.2. PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM

SCHEDULE)

6.3. REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

6.4. PRE-AWARD SURVEY INFORMATION

6.5. SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

7.2. EVALUATION

7.3. EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

7.4. PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

7.5 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION FACTOR RATING

ATTACHMENTS

1 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

3 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (OR PRIME IF WORK NOT TO BE

SUBCONTRACTED)

Section 00 22 00 Page 2

4 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

5 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

6 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

7 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR (DESIGN FIRM OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR)

8 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

Section 00 22 00 Page 3

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a “Best Value” tradeoff solicitation for the Design and Construction of Indoor Firing Range at Minot AFB, ND. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. PROPOSAL FORMAT

Written materials: 8 ½” x 11” format using 10 point or larger font size. For each electronic file submitted, provide a title page, table of contents and bookmarked tabs matching this documents’ Table of Contents. Provide a title sheet within each volume identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, fax and email address and point of contact. Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm.

Factor section and page number shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number and revision date for the amended page, if necessary)

In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website, https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software. The two (2) files listed below shall be submitted as “SEPARATE” single files via AMRDEC. It is imperative that none of the pricing or file 2 information show up in file 1. Offerors may use compression utilities such as 7-Zip, WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission when using AMRDEC. Offerors are encouraged to send all files in the same AMRDEC transmission, if possible.

Table 1 – AMRDEC Submittals

File 1 - Technical Proposal, Past Performance Information, and Small Business Participation Plan.

File 2 - Cost Information and Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

Title the single files in the following format:

W9128F-18-R-0048_Company Name_Technical W9128F-18-R-0048_Company Name_ Price (Note: Company name may be abbreviated)

To submit proposals via AMRDEC SAFE, go to the following website:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE. At the AMRDEC SAFE website select “Non-CAC Users” in order to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, you will be asked to enter e-mail addresses for the recipients. When your proposal is submitted via the AMRDEC SAFE website, the website will provide notification of the submittal to the recipients. For this solicitation, the recipients will be:

Ms. Lauren Levy (lauren.a.levy@usace.army.mil ) Ms. Ann Young (ann.t.young@usace.armym.mil) Ms. Stephanie Rostermundt (stephanie.a.rostermundt@usace.army.mil) Ms. Shanna Comparato (shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil)

After submitting your information, you will receive two disclaimers:

A. “The files were successfully uploaded.”

Section 00 22 00 Page 4

B. “Your files cannot be downloaded by recipients until you verify your email address. Please check your email for further instructions.”

***OFFERORS MUST FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS SENT TO YOUR EMAIL TO

COMPLETE THE SUBMITTAL PROCESS***

For the purposes of determining whether the proposal was received “late” in accordance with FAR 15.208, the date and time the file(s) are uploaded into the AMRDEC SAFE website as identified in the e-mail sent to the Contract Specialist(s)/Contracting Officer will be the time and date the Government received the proposal. Please note that the process involves two steps, after the proposal has been uploaded to the AMRDEC SAFE website the Offeror must verify its email address in order for the Government to receive access to the proposal uploaded onto the AMRDEC SAFE website. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous.

Please make allowances for delays in transmittal.

NOTE: ONLY in the unusual case that the AMRDEC SAFE website is “down” (not operational);

the Offeror should email their proposal to the following individuals prior to the proposal due date and time:

Ms. Lauren Levy (lauren.a.levy@usace.army.mil ) Ms. Ann Young (ann.t.young@usace.army.mil) Ms. Stephanie Rostermundt (stephanie.a.rostermundt@usace.army.mil) Ms. Shanna Comparato (shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil)

Electronic Proposals shall be received by the date and time indicated in Block 13 of the SF 1442 for this solicitation or as identified in subsequent amendments.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. All offers received in response to this solicitation will be evaluated in accordance with FAR Part 15.3, DoD Source Selection procedures, and Army Source Selection Supplement. The Contracting Officer will award a firm-fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than price; however, the Contract award should not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 01 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that offeror.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the RFP. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail and should be prepared

Section 00 22 00 Page 5 simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

3.3. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror’s evaluation.

3.4. Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal, provided that the Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor has or will have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines and provided that the requirements specified in Contract clause, “Requirements for Registration of Designers”, are met. All designs must be under the direct supervision of appropriately licensed professionals for each discipline involved.

3.5. Submit proposals in accordance with paragraph 1.2 above. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

4.1. FILE 1 –TECHNICAL

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

TECHNICAL Descending Order of Importance

FACTOR 1 File 1 Specialized Experience Most Important Factor

FACTOR 2 File 1 Project Management Plan 2nd Most Important Factor

FACTOR 3 File 1 Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience 3rd Most Important Factor

FACTOR 4 File 1 Past Performance 4th Most Important Factor

FACTOR 5 File 1 Small Business Participation Plan 5th Most Important Factor

4.2. FILE 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 6 File 2 Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

Not Rated

File 2 Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule

Not Rated

File 2 Evidence of Bondability Not Rated

Section 00 22 00 Page 6

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

File 2 Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

File 2 Sub-Contracting Plan Not Rated

All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are significantly more important than cost or price.

NOTE: 8(a) Joint Venture Offeror or Offeror submitting Proposal as HubZone Joint Venture shall submit evidence from Offerors SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or business Opportunity Specialist.

5.0 FILE 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. FILE 1– FACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1.1. Design and Construction Projects. The Offeror shall submit three projects performed by the Prime Construction Entity. Additionally, the Offeror shall submit three projects performed by the Lead Design Entity. Limit one (1) page per project submitted, with one additional page allowed for describing past teaming experience between current team members (see below).

Any information presented beyond the page limit will not be evaluated.

5.1.1.2. Teaming Experience. In one page, the Offeror shall demonstrate any previous teaming experience between current team members. Teaming experience information is limited to projects that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five years preceding the issue date of this solicitation.

5.1.1.3. Special Requirements. One (1) of the construction projects submitted and one (1) of the design projects shall clearly demonstrate experience with CONUS Indoor Firing Ranges no smaller than 10,000 square feet (approx. 929 square meters) in size. The government intends to hire experts in Indoor Firing Range design and construction.

5.1.1.4. Project Information. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar projects in scope and similar or greater in value. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than ten (10) years preceding the date of this solicitation. The proposed prime construction and lead design entities shall have performed in the same role as the prime or lead entities on the projects submitted. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements set forth in the RFP. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. If the Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. If projects were design-build, so identify them.

Project information shall CLEARLY include:

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Name of Firm

Section 00 22 00 Page 7

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner, including reference POC with confirmed contact information

(f) General Scope of Construction Project

(g) Summary of Your Role in the Project

(h) Construction Cost at completion

(i) Extent and Type of Work Subcontracted Out

(j) Dates Construction Began and Completed

5.1.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.1.2.1. Strengths or Significant Strengths may be given for:

• Experience on similar projects that exceed the scope and value.

• Federal Government project experience

• Proposals that include more than one (1) construction project with experience in

CONUS Indoor Firing Ranges

• Proposals that include more than one (1) design project with experience in CONUS

Indoor Firing Range

• Proposals that include projects completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

• The Government will consider extent of demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions.

• Design-Build experience

• Previous recent teaming experience among the team members (Design and

Construction firm)

• Any other aspect of a proposal that the evaluators and/or the SSA believe enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

• Note: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing DoD or Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

Note: A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project while employed at a different firm.

5.1.2.2. Weaknesses or Significant Weaknesses may be given for each of the following criteria:

• A design-build project where the Offeror did not actively participate in the design and construction aspect of the work.

• Projects that are not “well underway” or completed as defined above may be rated less favorably.

• Any project example submitted for which the Offeror was not the Prime Contractor or

Joint Venture participant at the time of project execution; any project example submitted for which the Offeror was a subcontractor.

• Omission or incompleteness of any requested information listed in Paragraph 5.1.1.

that is not otherwise found as a deficiency.

Section 00 22 00 Page 8

• Any other aspect of a proposal that the evaluators and/or the SSA believe is a flaw that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

5.2. FILE 1– FACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1. Provide information that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, and proposed contract duration. Limit the information to ten (10) pages or less.

5.2.1.2. Organization. List the design and construction entities and describe their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) shall be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s). Identify the design firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. The Offeror shall document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its lead design entity (ies) and key subcontractors. Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team.

Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the D-B team entities, and with the list of key personnel to be provided under Factor 3, “KEY PERSONNEL

CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE”.

5.2.1.3. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Describe the technical approach to design and construction of the facility. Include considerations for management of Indoor Firing Range construction. Include any considerations of fast-tracking design and construction, panelized construction, pre-engineered components, etc. The Government is looking for ways to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs and achieve an aggressive schedule while minimizing impact to the base. The Government is looking for ways to minimize impacts of the construction.

5.2.1.4. Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall clearly propose the contract duration in this Factor of the proposal.

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

5.2.2.1. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. This factor will be rated as unacceptable if the Offeror has not selected and committed to use its lead design entity (ies). Joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

5.2.2.2. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Proposals that clearly and concisely demonstrate a thorough understanding of the constraints and impacts on Indoor Firing Range construction may be given strengths. The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints, in an effort to reduce costs and support an aggressive schedule including such

Section 00 22 00 Page 9 things as fast-tracking, etc. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces on-site craft labor and susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

5.2.2.3. Proposed Contract Duration: Unless changed during negotiations, this duration will become the contractually binding performance period. The Government will rate the proposed duration matching or shorter than the benchmark duration as “acceptable”. No advantage will be considered for proposals that provide a duration shorter than the proposed benchmark. A proposed duration that is longer than the proposed benchmark duration will be viewed as a deficiency. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places undue risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment.

5.3. FILE 1– FACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.3.1. Submission Requirements:

5.3.1.1. For key personnel provide a brief resume using the Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section. Indicate the position title on each project listed in resumes. Provide the name, owner, dollar amount, date of completion, and brief scope of each resume project.

Include resumes for the following key personnel:

- Project Manager responsible for the overall project (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- Construction Quality Control System Manager (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- General Superintendent (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- Design Manager

5.3.1.2. The minimum experience requirement for the Project Manager is 5 years of experience as a Project Manager, managing similar projects to this solicitation and a Bachelor’s degree, according to section 01 33 00.32.

5.3.1.3. The minimum experience requirement for the Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager is 5 years of experience as a Quality Control Manager on similar projects to this solicitation. CQC System Manager shall comply with personnel requirements listed in Section 01 45 00.

5.3.1.4. The minimum experience requirement for the Superintendent is 5 years’ experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors.

5.3.1.5. The minimum experience requirements for the Design manager and designers of record are at least 5 years of design experience. The Design Manager and designers of record should be registered in accordance with FAR 52.236-25.

5.3.1.6. Offeror shall provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel NOT currently employed by the Offeror. Use the form letter at the end of this section.

5.3.1.7. Each of the key personnel shall demonstrate experience on at least one project that included an Indoor Firing Range completed in the past 5 years (as required for projects in Factor 1).

5.3.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

Section 00 22 00 Page 10

5.3.2.1. The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform the design, and to perform construction.

5.3.2.2. Resumes that do not clearly state the personnel’s specific duties and job title on previous projects may be rated less favorably.

5.3.2.3. Project Managers that hold active architect or engineer professional registration will be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.4. Offerors that propose key personnel who worked on the projects in Factor 1 may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.5. Key personnel that exceed the required minimum experience with Indoor Firing Range may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.6. Key personnel that exceed the required minimum years of experience in their position may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.7. Previous design-build experience may be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.8. Previous Federal government project experience may be rated more favorably.

5.4. FILE 1 – Factor 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

Submit past performance evaluations and ratings for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 - Specialized Experience.

If available, submit Construction Contract Administration Support System (CCASS) or Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) Performance Evaluations ratings. For projects which were designed and/or constructed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. For projects cited in Factor 1 Specialized Experience not covered in the CCASS / ACASS database or other Government Design Performance Rating System, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire.

5.4.1.1. CPARS/CCASS/ACASS Evaluations

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS/CCASS/ACASS past performance information directly from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) at http://www.ppirs.gov. PPIRS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto PPIRS will require the following: All firms must have purchased and installed a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate. If you do not have this certificate, you cannot access your information. Additional information about the PKI certificate is posted in red at the top, center portion, of the http://www.ppirs.gov web page. You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto PPIRS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the Central Contractor Registry at http://www.ccr.gov . If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the CCR help desk by emailing them from the email link on the http://www.ccr.gov/help.asp web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm.

Section 00 22 00 Page 11

There are two other ways to obtain a copy of CCASS / ACASS evaluations as follows: (1) Contact your government point of contact for the project you mentioned, and ask them if they can send you a copy, or (2) Apply for “Contractor Corporate Senior Management Representative” access on the following CCASS / ACASS web page:

http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/. This type of access is issued to only one person within the firm, typically a member of senior management. In addition to access to your completed CCASS / ACASS performance evaluations, you will also be able to view status of evaluations which have not yet been completed. Following receipt of your faxed application request, you will be emailed a logon and access instructions. This type of access will only let you see CCASS / ACASS information, so it is not as complete as PPIRS access which allows access to evaluations prepared by non-DOD federal agencies, as well as the DOD agencies which use CCASS / ACASS. Be aware that you will also need to have a PKI certificate to access the CCASS / ACASS system. This is a DOD requirement.

5.4.1.2. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The Past Performance Questionnaire is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client. The Past Performance Questionnaire should be completed by an owner or owner’s representative not affiliated with your firm. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client Information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

5.4.1.3. Government Utilization of Alternate Information Sources for Past Performance

The Government will assess the past performance on projects submitted under the Specialized Experience factor and reserves the right to conduct telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal or to review personal knowledge. In addition, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance of the Offeror on the submitted projects and any other previous work. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

5.4.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.4.2.1. The Government will evaluate the relative merits of each Offeror's past performance by following the relevancy and confidence assessment procedures. The evaluation of past performance will examine how well Offerors have performed on relevant projects considering

Section 00 22 00 Page 12 such criteria as: cost growth and adherence to budget; time growth, timeliness and adherence to schedule; quality and quality control measures; management of personnel and subcontractors; compliance with safety standards/safety plan; overall customer satisfaction;

responsiveness to customer concerns; and safety.

5.4.2.1.1. If an Offeror submits no past performance evaluations and the Government is unable to locate evaluations in PPIRS or other Design/Construction Performance Rating Systems, an Unknown Confidence (Neutral) rating will be given.

5.4.2.1.2. CPARS/CCASS Ratings will be given more weight than PPQs. The Government may, at its discretion, contact individuals other than those identified by the Offeror as references to verify the information contained therein. The Government reserves the right to consider all aspects of an Offeror's performance history, but may attribute more importance to work that was similar to the scope and type of project as stated in this solicitation.

Relevancy. The first aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how relevant recent previous experience accomplished by the Offeror is to the anticipated work to be accomplished under this contract. Recent is defined as past performance on contracts that had a construction completion date within the past five (5) years of the date that proposals are due. Relevancy is defined as similarity of items stated within this solicitation such as: types of projects, dollar value, contract type, and stakeholder(s). With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment. Relevancy is not a separate proposal rating but is used to develop an overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment.

The four levels of relevancy ratings are:

Very Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Quality. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine the overall quality of the Offeror’s past performance. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts. The SSEB will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment.

After evaluating relevancy and quality, a Performance Confidence Assessment rating will be determined. In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each Offeror shall be assigned one of the following ratings:

Substantial Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Section 00 22 00 Page 13

Satisfactory Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence. Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral). No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. Per Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.305(a) (2) (iv), “In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance.”

5.5. FILE 1 – Factor 5 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

5.5.1. Submission Requirements:

5.5.1.1. This factor requires all offerors, regardless of size status to address their planned small business usage for this project. All offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan. It should address their corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. All plans should address the Offeror's commitments to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. This Participation Plan should include a breakdown of small business subcategories to be used as shown on the chart in (d) below.

5.5.1.2. The Participation Plan should demonstrate commitment to all federally designated categories of small business: Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) HUBZone Small Businesses (HUB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSBs), and when applicable, Historically Black Colleges/Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MIs).

5.5.1.3. The plan should identify all categories for participation as part of the Offeror's team. This should include a general description of the type of work, product or service anticipated to be supplied via a small business concern. The Offeror shall not exceed more than 10 pages for the submitted Small Business Participation Plan. A specific format is not required, however, items stated below (a) through (e) shall be provided as a minimum.

Small Business Participation Plan requirements:

(a) Provide a Narrative addressing the corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. The Narrative should address the Offeror's commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. The Narrative should provide detailed supporting documentation regarding the individual commitments expressed in percentages for evaluators to determine that the goals stated are realistic.

(b) Provide the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror for this procurement.

Section 00 22 00 Page 14

______Large Business Prime Offeror

______Small Business Prime Offeror (also check type of SB below) ____Small Disadvantaged Business

____Woman-Owned Small Business…