Q A_1_15_16.pdf
PDF 67 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Rehab Little Papillion Creek
- Solicitation number
- W9128F-16-B-0001
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9128F-16-C-0012.pdf | ||
| COMPLETED_ABSTRACT_W9128F-16-B-0001.pdf | ||
| Am0003.pdf | ||
| Am0003_Dwgs.pdf | ||
| Am0002.pdf | ||
| Am0002_Dwgs.pdf | ||
| Additional_Little_Papio_Contractor_Q A.pdf | ||
| Am0001_Dwgs.pdf | ||
| Am0001.pdf | ||
| 16-B-0001_Little_Papio_Dwgs.pdf | ||
| 16-B-0001_Little_Papio_Near_NFM_Specs.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions 01/15/2016 From CTI Companies
1. Drawing Sheet CG501 indicates a 5’ stainless steel sump at bottom of relief well.
The specified elevations do not match, please clarify.
See Amendment 0003 Drawing CG501, Elevation was changed to from 945 to
950.
2. Please clarify the gradation of the riprap, specifically the top size which is required at 100% lighter.
See Amendment 0003, Sieve sizes for the stone weights were added.
3. Is there a need for contractor grading at the disposal site for excavated soil ?
See Amendment 0003, Drawing GI101.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .