W9128A-11-R-0007 Modification Notice 2.pdf
PDF 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9128A-11-R-0007
About this file
This modification notice 2 dated 15 February 2011 to Pre-solicitation notice W9128A-11-R-0007 provides additional information.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9128A-11-R-0007 Modification Notice.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
This modification notice #2 dated 15 February 2011 to Pre-solicitation notice W9128A-11-R-0007 provides additional information as follows:
Question 1: What are the font and margin specifications for this solicitation?
Response: 1: There is no established font requirement; however, the font should be large enough to be read without straining. There are no margin specifications; however, the proposal is one indicator of the quality of your work, use your best judgment in the presentation the SF 330.
Question 2: How many copies of the proposal need to be submitted?
Response 2: One (1). Reference Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice
Question 3: Is there a page count limitation for any of the SF 330 sections?
Response 3: No. Reference Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice
Question 4: Will the proposal submittal be electronic or hard copy?
Response 4: Hard Copy. Reference Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice
Question 5: For A-E services for comprehensive engineering planning for future construction requirements, will consideration be given more favorably to one military or civil works funded program over others?
Response 5: No it will not.
Question 6: Will engineering planning services for Army MILCON funded programs weight heavier over Navy, Air Force, DoD, or DODEA MILCON programs?
Response 6: No. Reference Paragraph 3 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice
Question 7: Will host nation funded programs in Korea and Japan have the same weight of relevance in the evaluation of A-E experience?
Response 7: The synopsis asks for experience. Experience performed outside Hawaii - even though the work will primarily be in Hawaii – counts equally under this criterion. Reference Paragraph 3 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice
Question 8: With respect to requirements for compatibility with specific computer-aided drafting (CAD) equipment and compliance with A/E/C standards, would the use of the Bentley MicroStation platform be more favorably evaluated over the AutoDesk or other platforms?
Response 8: No.
Question 9: Can you please clarify your preference for submittals by our sub-consultants for the above-cited solicitation? Would you like to see a SF 330 Part II only for each sub-consultant, or may we provide their full SF330 Response 9: Refer to SF330, Paragraph 2 under General Instructions.
Question 10: What is that last date/time that questions may be submitted?
Response 10: No futher RFI’s will be answered
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .