About this file

This modification notice 2 dated 15 February 2011 to Pre-solicitation notice W9128A-11-R-0007 provides additional information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W9128A-11-R-0007 Modification Notice.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

This modification notice #2 dated 15 February 2011 to Pre-solicitation notice W9128A-11-R-0007 provides additional information as follows:

Question 1: What are the font and margin specifications for this solicitation?

Response: 1: There is no established font requirement; however, the font should be large enough to be read without straining. There are no margin specifications; however, the proposal is one indicator of the quality of your work, use your best judgment in the presentation the SF 330.

Question 2: How many copies of the proposal need to be submitted?

Response 2: One (1). Reference Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice

Question 3: Is there a page count limitation for any of the SF 330 sections?

Response 3: No. Reference Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice

Question 4: Will the proposal submittal be electronic or hard copy?

Response 4: Hard Copy. Reference Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice

Question 5: For A-E services for comprehensive engineering planning for future construction requirements, will consideration be given more favorably to one military or civil works funded program over others?

Response 5: No it will not.

Question 6: Will engineering planning services for Army MILCON funded programs weight heavier over Navy, Air Force, DoD, or DODEA MILCON programs?

Response 6: No. Reference Paragraph 3 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice

Question 7: Will host nation funded programs in Korea and Japan have the same weight of relevance in the evaluation of A-E experience?

Response 7: The synopsis asks for experience. Experience performed outside Hawaii - even though the work will primarily be in Hawaii – counts equally under this criterion. Reference Paragraph 3 of the Pre-Solicitation Notice

Question 8: With respect to requirements for compatibility with specific computer-aided drafting (CAD) equipment and compliance with A/E/C standards, would the use of the Bentley MicroStation platform be more favorably evaluated over the AutoDesk or other platforms?

Response 8: No.

Question 9: Can you please clarify your preference for submittals by our sub-consultants for the above-cited solicitation? Would you like to see a SF 330 Part II only for each sub-consultant, or may we provide their full SF330 Response 9: Refer to SF330, Paragraph 2 under General Instructions.

Question 10: What is that last date/time that questions may be submitted?

Response 10: No futher RFI’s will be answered

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .