A.07.23_W9127S_19_Q_0045_Combined_And_Synopsis_Region_5.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted Aug 14, 2019

Attached to: 63RD Readiness Division Region 5 Janitorial
Solicitation number: W9127S19Q0045
Issued by: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Little Rock

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
W9127S19Q0045_P0001_AMENDMENT_1.pdf	PDF	Sep 9, 2019
Reg_5_Janitorial_ProjNet_Closed_Report.pdf	PDF	Sep 6, 2019
A.01.30_PWS_63RD_REGION_5_JANITORIAL_Final_part3_20DEC2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 14, 2019
Region_5_Janitorial_ELINS_24JUNE2019.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Aug 14, 2019
63d_RD_DPW_Operations_Area_Map.pdf	PDF	Aug 14, 2019
A.01.30_PWS_63RD_REGION_5_JANITORIAL_Final_part1_20Dec2018(0045).pdf	PDF	Aug 14, 2019
A.01.30_PWS_63RD_REGION5_JANITORIAL_Final_part2_20DEC2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 14, 2019

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

Solicitation Number W9127S19Q0045 is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-101.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; Quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

Title: Janitorial Services (JS), Region 5, 63d U.S Army Reserve Readiness Division (RD) Due Date for Quotes: 18 Sept 2019 12:00 PM CT

This solicitation is a small business set-aside. NAICS Code 561720 applies and the small business size standard is $18.0 million.

This is a requirement to provide JS. The period of performance is a 1 year base plus 2 option years: Base year - 01/01/2020 TO 12/31/2020, Option year 1 - 01/01/2021 TO 12/31/2021, Option year 2 - 01/01/2022

TO 12/31/2022.

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Please see the electronic attachment titled: Performance Work Statement, found on FBO.GOV under the corresponding solicitation number. (63RD_R5MS_JANITORIAL_FINAL PWS_20DEC2019)

EXHIBIT LINE ITEMS SPREADSHEET

Please see the electronic attachment titled: Exhibit Line Items (ELINs), found on FBO.GOV under the corresponding solicitation number.

- R5MS - Janitorial ELINS 24JUN2019

Exhibit Line Items (ELINs): ELINs spreadsheet are in MS Excel Format and posted with the solicitation shall be completed by the Offeror & submitted in MS Excel Format. The completed ELINs will constitute Offerors proposed prices for the services corresponding to the PWS. Upon contract award, a price schedule in contract section B will be created using the completed ELINs from the successful Offeror. Failure to bid on all the items in the ELINs spreadsheet may cause the bid to be considered nonresponsive and therefore ineligible for contract award.

QUOTE COVER PAGE

US Army Corps of Engineer, Little Rock District Contracting Division

700 W. Capitol Avenue Room # 7315 Little Rock, AR 72201

W9127S19Q0045, IDIQ

Region 5 - Janitorial Services

Submitted by

Offeror Name:

Offeror Address:

Offeror Address Cont'd:

Cage Code:

DUNS Number:

TIN:

Telephone Number:

Authorized Negotiators:

Authorized Negotiators Cont'd:

SECTIONL

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONSANDNOTICESTOBIDDERS /OFFEROR SUBMITTAL

INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS (RFQS)

This requirement defines the criteria, organization, and policies to be used in selecting a contractor to provide The 63d U.S. Army Reserve RD critical work in the areas of Janitorial Services for Region 5

A. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Little Rock District (SWL) and the 63d RD have a requirement to provide janitorial services on a regional basis.

B. ACQUISITION STRATEGY

This is a competitive acquisition for the award of a firm-fixed-price (FFP) Services contract. In accordance with (IAW) the Acquisition Plan (AP), this solicitation is restricted as set-aside for eligible and responsible small business (SB) firms. This is a competitive 100% small business set- aside. Award will be based on a Best Value Decision, Tradeoff process, to the best overall proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government. The anticipated ordering period is 1 year base plus 2 one year options.

Evaluation methodology for the instant procurement consists of a Best-value Trade-off.

1. INQUIRIES

Bidder Inquiry: Technical inquiries and questions relating to quote procedures or bonds are to be submitted via: Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above, click Bid tab and select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that the information on next screen is correct, click and continue.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is:

The Bidder Inquiry Key is:

The Review is open from:

W9127S19Q0045

5XPZEJ-JE94AB

13 AUG-2019 TO 4-SEPT-2019 - 12:00 PM CT.

The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable after 4-SEPT-2019 for new inquires in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation , if necessary.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in it's entirely, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Oral explanations or instruction are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition , there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made.

2. SITEVISIT

WHEN:

WHERE:

Tuesday, 20 Aug -2019at 1:00 pm PDT CA002 Patton Hall USARC, Bldg #334 5340 Bandini Blvd, Bell, CA 90201

Please provide the Contract Specialist (Staci C. Allen) via email at staci.c.allen@usace.army.mil, the following information if your company will be attending the site visit:

- Names and Titles of those attending

- Contact Information (Emails and phone numbers)

****Above Items are due to the Contract Specialist NLT: 16-AUG-2019 @ 10:00 am CT.

Note to ALL CONTRACTORS - Site visit information to access CA002 ( Patton Hall USARC) Facility use the main gate located at 5348 Lindbergh Ln, Bell, CA 90201

IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) There will be NO remarks, questions or explanations addressed during the site visit. Please submit all inquiries through the Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet. This ensures all participants have access to all questions and answers equally and fairly. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

Funds are not presently available for this acquisition.. No award will be made until appropriate funds are made available. This requirement is included or provided for in the financial plan for FY20.

A. QUOTE SUBMISSION - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR'S (Section L)

1. Introduction: The Offeror's Quote shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying digital copies, as set forth below. The RFQ shall provide the Government address and receipt date for Quote submittal.

The Offeror's Quote shall consist of two (2) volumes. These Volumes are I - Technical , and II- Price.

A. Volume I - Technical Volume

a) Factor 1: Corporate Experience

b) Factor 2: Understanding of the Work

c) Factor 3: Past Performance

B. Volume II - Price Volume

a) Cover Sheet

b) Acknowledgement of Amendments (if any)

c) ELINs Spreadsheet

d) Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

e) Offeror Representations and Certifications

Offerors are cautioned that "parroting" of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each Quote.

Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

2. QUOTE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a) Each volume shall be submitted in a separate three-ring binder. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or Quote revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated. Each binder shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

b) Printing should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8- point and may be landscape.

The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volume: I-Technical (non-price): Printed: I-Original & 3 copies Digital: 4 copies

Volume: II - Cost/Price: Printed: I-Original & 1 copy Digital: 2 copies

c) Note: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

*Manpower charts are excluded from the page count.

d) The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor 1, Corporate Experience - 8 Page Limit (a maximum of2 pages per contract) Factor 2, Understanding of the Work - 25 Page Limit Factor 3, Offeror Past Performance - No Page Limitations

Tables of content, Quote cover letters, and tabs between Quote information do not count toward any page limitations in the Quote

3. QUOTE FILES

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriatel y numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFQ number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins - Top, Bottom, Left, Right - 1" Gutter - O" From Edge - Header, Footer 0.5'' Page Size, Width- 8.5" Page Size, Height - 11"

NOTE: llXl 7folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations;

however, each llXl7 page counts as two pages.

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging: All of the Quote files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled Quote zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads in their native format, i.e. doc, xis, ppt, etc., and provided on CDs or DVDs. Zip disks are not permitted. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2007. Each disc shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date , and the Offeror's name. **Please note - Self extracting exe files are not acceptable. ** If the hard- copy Quote differs from the electronic version, the hard copy will govern.

c. Content Requirement: All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the quote in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each quote. Each file of the Quote shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrati ve discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file.

Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I-Technical (non-price)._The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Tab A - Factor 1 - Corporate Experience. Include completed CORPORATE EXPERIENCE DATA SHEETS in addition to your Quote information. A sample sheet is provided in this Section (See Appendix A).

Tab B - Factor 2 - Understanding of the Work. Include a brief narrative (See requirements in Section D Evaluation Approach, Factor 2, Understanding of Work), in addition to your Quote information.

Tab C - Factor 3 - Offeror Past Performance. Include completed Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Forms in addition to your Quote information. A sample Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form is provided in this Section (See Attachment 1).

Tabs:

(ii) VOLUME II - Price. This volume shall consist of all information , required to support proposed prices. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume.

a. Cover Sheet

b. Acknowledgement of Amendments (if any)

c. ELINs Spreadsheet

d. Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

e. Offeror Representations and Certifications

Exhibit Line Items (ELINs): ELINs spreadsheet posted with the solicitation shall be completed by the Offeror and submitted in MS Excel Format. The completed ELINs will constitute Offeror's proposed prices for the services corresponding to the PWS. Upon contract award, a price schedule in contract section B will be created using the completed ELINs from the successful Offeror.

** See Quote Submission Requirements (2) Volume II -Price Volume

Submittal:

1. Quote Submittals:

Submit Quotes to:

CONTRACTING DIVISION USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM # 7315

LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201-3225

1. The Packaging: The quotes shall be marked:

"Quotes for W9127S19Q0045 63d Reserve Janitorial Services, R5"

"DO NOT OPEN"

Attn: Staci C. Allen Offer Closing Date: 18-SEPT-2019 Offer Closing Time: 12:00 PM CT

EVALUATION FACTORS

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

EVALUATION APPROACH

The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror demonstrates the ability to accomplish the work specified under the RFQ. This assessment will be based on consideration of all the technical factors and price. The approach to the selection for this procurement will be pursuant to a best value concept. The objective is to select the quote that offers the best value for the Government, not necessarily the lowest price.

The technical factors used in this evaluation are listed below. Please note that factor 1 and factor 2 are the most important factors. They are equal with respect to each other, but are more important than factor 3 or price. Factor 3 is more important than price. Moreover, collectively, all of the technical factors are significantly more important than price. However, as quotes become more equal technically, price may become a determining factor in award selection.

Factor 1: Corporate Experience Factor 2:

Understanding of the Work Factor 3: Past Performance

Factor 1, Corporate Experience: The offer will be evaluated based on the demonstrated ability to execute the requirements of the Performance Work Statement. Offerors shall submit evidence of a minimum of three (3), but no more than four (4) similar requirements. If there is a teaming arrangement, a minimum of 3 similar contracts are required from the prime. Offeror’ s shall complete and provide a Corporate Experience Data Sheet for each similar contract; refer to Appendix A. The Corporate Experience Data Sheet shall not exceed 2 pages per contract.

For evaluation purposes, the definition of a similar requirement is as follows: A recent contract awarded to the Offeror ( or in the case of an Offeror which is a Joint Venture (JV), a contract awarded to either member of the JV) as the prime contractor. The contract should be 60% complete in terms of period of performance or completed projects within the last five years that are similar in terms of scope and cost to the requirement.

Factor 2, Understanding of the Work: Evaluators will determine whether the Offeror demonstrates an understanding of the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

The quote submission for this factor shall include a narrative (conceptual work plan) that clearly demonstrates an understanding of requirements of the solicitation. The narrative shall address how the Offeror will perform, develop and implement a Janitorial Services Programs. This information can be in charts, tables, sketches and maps as necessary to make the work approach understandable. The Narrative shall not exceed 25 pages. The narrative should, at a minimum, contain a description of the following:

(1) Ability to perform Janitorial Services as required by the RFQ.

(2) A thorough understanding of the current commercial standard s, policies, procedures , and processes utilized in

Janitorial Services identified in the PWS.

(3) A thorough understanding of the difficulties, uncertainties and risks associated with Janitorial Services as identified in the PWS, as well as administering the contract as a whole.

(4) A logical performance approach for Janitorial Services identified in the PWS, as well as administering the contract as a whole.

(5) Management & administration capabilities commensurate with the magnitude of the resulting contract.

(6) Appropriate types ofresources required to perform the work and of their appropriate allocation to the work activities in multiple locations during weekdays , weekends , and holidays when appli cable ;

(7) Personnel and subcontractors necessary to perform the work required by the RFQ.

(8) Organizational Chart: The Offeror shall provide an organizational chart that identifies key personnel and individuals on the project team that show clear lines of authorit y, respons ibilit y, and communication between corporate staff, key on-site staff, and subcontractor interface. The Offeror should propose a logical flow of authority and demonstrate how assigned responsibilities and experience of proposed on-site personnel for the multiple geographic sites will enhance operation of the project.

For Factor 1 Corporate Experience and Factor 2 Understanding of the Work the offer will be rated utilizing the chart provided below:

Outstanding Quote meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Quote meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Quotation contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Quote meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Quote does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The quotation has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Quote does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.

Quotation is un-awardable.

Factor 3, Past Performance: The Governments past performance evaluation will include an assessment of past performance on relevant contracts (as defined above). The evaluators will assess whether the Offeror has obtained an overall satisfactory past performance rating on relevant contracts, to demonstrate the ability of the Offeror to accomplish the work specified under the RFQ. Key focus areas will include the following (see PPQ):

• Quality

• Schedule /Timeliness of Performance

• Customer Satisfaction

• Management/Personnel/Labor

• Cost/Fin ancial Management

• Safety/Securit y

This assessment will be based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstan ces, including any trends in past performance. Offerors shall complete and provide a Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Forms from Attachment 1 on the same contracts submitted for consideration under Factor 1, Corporate Experience.

The offeror shall complete Blocks 1-4 of the provided Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire (Attachment 1) and have the Contracting Activity and the Technical Representative responsible for the past/current contract complete the remainder of the questionnaire. Offeror shall ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted with the Quote. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before Quote closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the Quote the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests , questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact via email no later than the closing date of this RFQ. Include Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) performance evaluation ratings, if available.

For projects which were performed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. Also include performance recognition documents received for the Factor 1 projects such as awards, award fee determ in ations, customer letters of commend ation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Government may call and confirm information provided by the offeror on the Past Performance Information Sheet with the points of contact. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. If an offeror has no relevant past performance his tory, the offeror must affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance.

The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its Quote and data obtained from other sources. Other sources may in clud e, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint ventur e, teaming arrangement , or parent company/subsid ia ry/affili ate) identified in the Offerors Quote.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the Offerors past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Common aspects of relevancy include similarity of service in scope and price. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts.

1. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings (Adjectival) -- Past performance analysis provides insight into an Offerors probability of successfully completing the solicitation requirements based on the Offerors performance record on similar contract efforts.

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment - Performance confidence is the confidence associated with an Offeror' s likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements as indicated by that Offeror' s record of current or past performance. Performance Confidence Assessment: In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in accordance with the table below.

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the Offeror' s recent/relevan t performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Offeror' s recent/relevan t performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror' s recent /relevant performance record , the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relev ant performance record is available or the Offerors performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

PRICE: Offerors will be required to price all line items for each contract period (base and both option years). The Government will perform a price analysis on all Quotes received. Price reasonableness will be determined in accordance with FAR 15.404-1. Additiona lly, the role of price in the best value trade off will be as described above.

DISCUSSION SCHEDULING: If discussions are condu cted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each offeror will be notified of the time and place at least two (2) business day prior to their discussion session. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification.

Options: The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time , the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt , unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

APPENDIX A- CORPORATE EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT 1- PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE FORM

Appendix A

CORPORA TE EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

FACTOR 1: CORPORA TE EXPERIENCE.

Project Title:

Location:

Contract number:

Nature of involvement in this project, i.e. General Contractor, subcontractor, designer:

Procuring activity:

Procurement point of contact and telephone number:

Performance period (month/year start to month /year end or percent complete if performance is underway):

Address of project:

Address and telephone number of owner:

Indicate type of project (private sector, Government , planned unit development, etc.):

General description of project:

How this project to relevant to the requirements of this solicitation:

Total cost:

TERMINATED PROJECTS:

Attach a list of any projects within the last three years that have been terminated. Provide an explanation, as well as a Point of Contact (Name, organization, email, phone number) for each terminated project.

I CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLI ENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTI ON N AI RE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SU BM IT THE COMPLETED QUESTI O NNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR QUOTE, AND MAY DUPLI CATE THIS QUESTI ON N AI RE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICIT ATIONS . CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONN AIR ES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER , QUESTIONN AIRES MAY BE SU BM IT TED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORM ATI ON ON THIS FORM.

ATTACHMENT 1

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNsNumber:

Phone Number:

Email Address :

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delive ry/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location :

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences :

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions , etc. )

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client's role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client's Signature:

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner.Asingular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Gove rnmen t's /Owner' s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred thatthe contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner.Asingular problem, however , could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactoryrating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR 'S PERFORMANCE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE.

I I

I I I I

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG s M u N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG s M u N c)Timeliness/effectiveness ofcontract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG s M u N

d) Adequacy /effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) E VG s M u N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG s M u N

b) Rate the contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG s M u N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG s M u N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements /disputes;

responsivenessto administrativereports, businesslike and communication)

E VG s M u N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG s M u N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG s M u N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness ofon-site management , including management of subcon tractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG s M u N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG s M u N c)Government Property Control E VG s M u N

d) Knowledge /expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG s M u N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG s M u N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG s M u N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, includingplanning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG s M u N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively le ad, manage and control the program)

E VG s M u N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG s M u N b)Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG s M u N

c) Ifthfa is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained

E VG s M u N variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor ' s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? Ifn o, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations ? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued , or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY /SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules , regul ations , and requirements regarding housekeeping , safety, correction ofnoted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG s M u N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG s M u N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG s M u N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions(explain ifspecific issues) E VG s M u N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG s M u N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE

FFP

Janitorial Services - Base

FFP

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, and restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

FOB: Destination FOB: Destination

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE

FFP

Janitorial Services IDIQ - Base

FFP

IDIQ Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, and restroom services -for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated). Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

FOB: Destination FOB: Destination

FFP

Contractor Manpower Reporting - Base

FFP

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site.

FOB: Destination FOB: Destination

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE

FFP

Contractor Submittals

FFP

This CLIN is for the Start-up Submittal Period (first month only). This is to include but not limited to: successfully submit all permits, licenses, accident prevention plans, quality management plans, etc., required by the Government in Section F (Deliveries or Performance) of the PWS to successfully start in allocations designated in the region at the end of the start-up submittal period.

FOB: Destination

FFP

Janitorial Services - OY1

FFP

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, and restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

FOB: Destination FOB: Destination

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE

FFP

Janitorial Services IDIQ - OY1

FFP

FOB: Destination

FFP

Contractor Manpower Reporting - OY1

FFP

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site.

FOB: Destination FOB: Destination

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE

FFP

Janitorial Services - OY2

FFP

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, and restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

FOB: Destination

FFP

Janitorial Services IDIQ - OY2

FFP

FOB: Destination FOB: Destination

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE

FFP

Contractor Manpower Reporting - OY2

FFP

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site.

FOB: Destination

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 01-FEB-2020 TO

31-DEC-2020

N/A MEDICAL SUPPORT BRANCH

TAMMY JONES

P.O. BOX 867 700 WEST CAPITAL

LITTLE ROCK AR 72203

501.340.1070 FOB: Destination

967275

0002 POP 01-FEB-2020 TO

31-DEC-2020